Skip to main content
World Journal of Clinical Cases logoLink to World Journal of Clinical Cases
. 2023 Sep 26;11(27):6653–6663. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i27.6653

Solitary intraosseous neurofibroma in the mandible mimicking a cystic lesion: A case report and review of literature

Zheng Zhang 1,2, Xia Hong 3, Feng Wang 4, Xin Ye 5, You-Dan Yao 6, Ying Yin 7, Hong-Yu Yang 8,9
PMCID: PMC10600983  PMID: 37900249

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neurofibromas are benign tumors of a neurogenic origin. If these tumors occur without any other signs of neurofibromatosis, they are classified as isolated neurofibromas. Neurofibromas in the oral cavity mostly occur within soft tissues, indicating that solitary intraosseous neurofibromas in the mandible are rare. Due to the absence of specific clinical manifestations, early diagnosis and treatment of these tumors are difficult to achieve.

CASE SUMMARY

A 37-year-old female patient visited our hospital due to numbness and swelling of the gums in the right lower molar area that had persisted for half a month. The patient’s overall condition and intraoral examination revealed no significant abnormalities. She was initially diagnosed with a cystic lesion in the right mandible. However, after a more thorough examination, the final pathological diagnosis was confirmed to be neurofibroma. Complete tumor resection and partial removal of the right inferior alveolar nerve were performed. As of writing this report, there have been no signs of tumor recurrence for nine months following the surgery.

CONCLUSION

This case report discusses the key features that are useful for differentiating solitary intraosseous neurofibromas from other cystic lesions.

Keywords: Neurofibromas, Mandible, Cystic lesion, Odontogenic cyst, Schwannomas, Case report


Core Tip: We present the case of a 37-year-old female with a solitary intraosseous neurofibroma in the right mandible, accompanied by tooth root resorption and local sensory abnormalities. Imaging revealed low-density unicysts with clear borders. The area affected by the inferior alveolar nerve canal was locally dilated, without displacement. A histological evaluation of the mass revealed spindle-shaped fibroblasts and fibroblast-like cell proliferation with a slight increase in nuclear size. Immunohistochemistry results showed positive staining for S100 and CD34 markers. Complete tumor resection and partial removal of the right inferior alveolar nerve were performed.

INTRODUCTION

Neurofibromas are typically benign tumors that originat from the sheath of the peripheral nervous system. They can present as isolated lesions or as a part of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a systemic syndrome also known as von Recklinghausen disease[1]. NF1 is a common neurocutaneous disorder with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern; however, solitary neurofibromas do not exhibit this pattern[2]. Neurofibromas occur predominantly in soft tissues and less frequently in bones. It is important to note that approximately 20%-60% of oral neurofibromas are associated with neurofibromatosis. They are commonly found in the tongue, buccal mucosa, and vestibular areas[3]. Solitary intraosseous neurofibromas of the head and neck are rare, with those in the posterior part of the mandible being the most prevalent site. The early diagnosis and treatment of neurofibromas can be challenging due to their lack of specific clinical manifestations. However, with the aid of imaging techniques, such as cone-beam computed tomography (CT) (CBCT), cystic lesions can be easily diagnosed, which can affect treatment plans. Timely local organizational biopsies are crucial for an accurate diagnosis, and confirmation can be obtained through pathological examination. This report describes a rare case of a solitary intraosseous neurofibroma in the right mandible accompanied by tooth root resorption and local sensory abnormalities.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 37-year-old female patient visited our hospital with numbness and swelling of the gums in the right lower molar area that had persisted for half a month.

History of present illness

Fifteen days prior, the patient had visited a local clinic due to numbness and swelling of the gums in the right lower molar area. Oral panoramic radiography revealed low-density lesions at the root tip in the right mandibular molar area, specifically affecting the lower right second molar. Despite discovering the anomaly, the patient did not report any significant pain, bleeding in the lower right gum or teeth, or unusual odor in the mouth. Additionally, the patient denied experiencing any abnormal sensation in the lower right lip.

History of past illness

There was no significant medical history related to this illness.

Personal and family history

The patient had no family history of hereditary diseases or malignant tumors.

Physical examination

The patient’s general health was satisfactory, and no anomalies were detected on the skin of the face or the rest of the body. The patient’s facial features were symmetrical, with no apparent swelling. No significant buccolingual bulge was observed in the right mandible, nor was there any palpable ping-pong-like sensation. The right mandibular molars exhibited second-degree loosening and discomfort upon percussion. Slight redness and swelling were noticed on the buccal side of the right lower posterior tooth’s gingiva, with no sinus, pus discharge, or bleeding. The patient reported symmetrical sensory acuity in both upper and lower lips.

Laboratory examinations

The results of routine blood tests were as follows: Mean platelet volume: 8.7 fL (reference value: 9.0-13.0 fL); platelet distribution width: 8.8 fL (reference value: 9.0-17.0 fL).

Imaging examinations

CBCT revealed a hypodense image measuring approximately 4.7 cm × 2.3 cm × 1.6 cm in the body of the right mandible. A white bone line surrounding the lesion was observed, along with thinning of the cortical bone. The lesion affected the apex of the lower right second molar with evident root resorption. The apical lesion of the lower right first molar seemed isolated, while the lower right third molar was located outside the mass and buried within the bone. The affected area of the inferior alveolar nerve canal was locally dilated without displacement (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Imaging examination. A: The oral cone-beam computed tomography (CT) revealed a hypodense image with a size of approximately 4.7 cm × 2.3 cm in the body of the right mandible. A white line is observed around the lesion. The lesion affected the apex of tooth 47 with visible root resorption. The area affected by the inferior alveolar nerve canal was locally dilated without displacement; B: CT (axial section) showing an oval-shaped, low-density area of the right mandible accompanied by cortical bone thinning.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

After comprehensive assessment of the clinical presentation, blood test results, imaging findings, and pathological examination, the patient was diagnosed with a solitary intraosseous neurofibroma of the right mandible.

TREATMENT

On September 7, 2022, we performed complete tumor resection, along with partial removal of the right inferior alveolar nerve and extraction of the lower right third molar. During surgery, the tumor appeared as a grayish-white solid and the main trunk of the inferior alveolar nerve was not visible. Microscopic examination revealed spindle-shaped fibroblasts and fibroblast-like cell proliferation, with a slight increase in nuclear size. The nuclei were short and spindle-shaped, the cytoplasm showed rich red staining, and axons were locally visible (Figure 2). Immunohistochemistry results showed positive staining for S100, CD34, and H3K27me3 (Figure 2) and negative staining for smooth muscle actin, neurofilaments protein, and epithelial membrane antigen (Supplementary Figure 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Microscopic features of neurofibroma. A-C: Histopathological examination with toluidine blue and hematoxylin and eosin staining showing spindle fiber and fibroblast-like cell proliferation with slight nuclear enlargement. The nuclei were short and spindle-shaped, the cytoplasm was richly stained red, and axons were locally visible; D: Immunohistochemistry positive for S-100 protein; E: Immunohistochemistry positive for CD34; F: Immunohistochemistry positive for H3K27ME3.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Nine months after the surgery, there were no signs of tumor recurrence. However, the patient developed numbness in the lower right lip, which had not improved at the time of writing this report.

DISCUSSION

Solitary neurofibromas are slow-growing benign tumors that are not encapsulated. In cases where patients do not exhibit other manifestations of neurofibromatosis, such as axillary freckling, iris hamartomas, or skeletal dysplasia, they are diagnosed with isolated neurofibromas. Neurofibromas of the oral cavity primarily originate from the mucosa. Bone involvement in neurofibromatosis is typically attributed to subperiosteal neurofibromas, which can cause bone erosion[4]. Solitary intraosseous neurofibromas are rare because the bone marrow space lacks nerve sheaths or myelinated nerves[5]. We have compiled the results from 38 studies on the subject, published since the discovery of solitary intraosseous mandibular neurofibromas (Table 1)[5-35]. The posterior part of the mandible is the most common location, with a higher incidence in females. The average age of presentation is 27.5 years[6]. The length and thickness of the inferior alveolar nerve bundles may contribute to the comparatively high frequency of this illness in the mandible[7].

Table 1.

Summary of reports of solitary intraosseous neurofibromas of the mandible

Ref.
Age (year)/sex
Site
Clinical features
Radiographic features
Root resorption
Size
Immunohistochemistry features
Surgical approach
Prognosis
Present case 37/F Body Numbness and swelling of the gum in the right lower molar area Unilocular expansile radiolucency involving the inferior alveolar nerve canal Yes 4.7 cm × 2.3 cm × 1.6 cm Positive staining for S100, CD34, and H3K27me3,negative staining for SMA, NF, and EMA Excision of the tumor and nerve No recurrence observed nine months post-surgery
Kamalakaran et al[5] 5/M Body-ramus Limited mouth opening and enlarged submandibular lymph nodes Expansile lesion with a mixture of radiolucent and radiopaque components No 3.9 cm × 3.8 cm × 3.1 cm Not reported Segmental resection of the mandible No recurrence observed one-year post-surgery
Sarkar et al[6] 2.5/M Body-ramus Swelling in the posterior right part of the mandible. Displacement of deciduous teeth Well-definedexpansile solid-cystic lesion with evidence of cortical erosion No 3.7 cm × 3.5 cm × 3.4 cm S-100 multifocal and moderately positive, strong CD34 positivity EMA, cytokeratin, CD31, SMA, STAT-6, TLE-1, and HMB-45 negative MIB-1 index low Preservation of the nerve while removing the mass Not reported
Behrad et al[13] 32/F Body Swelling and intermittent dull pain in the left mandible Unilocular expansile radiolucency involving the inferior alveolar nerve canal No 3 cm × 1.5 cm × 2.4 cm Not reported Simple excision of the mass Not reported
Iqbal et al[14] 13/M Body-angle Swelling in the posterior area of the right mandible Ill-defined radiolucency No 2.0 cm × 3.0 cm × 2.0 cm S-100 positive Simple excision of the mass No recurrence
Inoue et al[15] 27/M Ramus to infratemporal fossa Progressive numbness on the lower right jaw A nonenhanced mass in the infratemporal region, with an enlarged inferior alveolar nerve canal and foramen ovale No Not reported S-100 positive Excision of the tumor and nerve No recurrence
Narang et al[16] 45/F Left mandibular angle to right mental foramen Swelling in the posterior area of the left mandible The radiographic irregularity in the region of the inferior lacrimal canal Yes Not reported S-100 positive, MIB-1 negative Segmental resection of the mandible Not reported
Fortier[17] 70/F Body Osteolytic lesion of the right posterior mandible The clear single-eyed translucent area. Involvement of the inferior alveolar nerve canal No Not reported S-100 positive Preservation of the nerve while removing the mass No recurrence
Gujjar et al[18] 28/F Body Swelling and intermittent dull pain in the left mandible Uniform radiopacity. Involvement of the inferior alveolar nerve canal No 3.0 cm × 4.0 cm S-100 positive Segmental resection of the mandible Not reported
Saravani et al[19] 39/F Body Severe pain in the right posterior mandible Relatively clear single-cyst projection shadow No Not reported S-100 positive Simple excision of the mass No recurrence
Jangam et al[20] 62/F Right body-left body The lower jaw is significantly swollen. Occasionally, there is severe pain Radiographically transparent image with clear borders, accompanied by thinning of the lower boundary Edentulous jaw Not reported S-100 positive Segmental resection of the mandible. Repair using a free fibular graft No recurrence
Deichler et al[21] 14/M Ramus No clinical symptoms, discovered incidentally Unilocular radiolucency No 4.0 cm × 1.5 cm × 0.5 cm Tumor cells: Vimentin positive, neurospecific enolase (NSE) positive and anti S-100 negative. Residual nerve fibres: S-100 positive; NSE positive Simple excision of the mass Not reported
Tao et al[22] 16/F Ramus Limited mouth opening, numbness in the lower left lip Multilocular radiolucency with irregular edges No 3.5 cm × 2.0 cm S-100 positive Segmental resection of the mandible. Repair using a free iliac bone graft Not reported
Vivek et al[7] 39/F Symphysis-parasymphysis Spontaneous tooth loss, persistent tingling sensation in the lower lip A relatively well-defined radiolucent area No Not reported S-100 positive Segmental resection of the mandible No recurrence observed one-year post-surgery
Apostolidis et al8] 67/F Body-ramus Abnormal sensation in the lower left lip Involvement of the inferior alveolar nerve canal No 2.5 cm × 2 cm × 0.7 cm Not reported Excision of the tumor and nerve No recurrence observed three-year post-surgery
Alatli et al[23] 37/F Body Abnormal sensation in the lower right lip No abnormalities detected No Diameter of 1.3 centimeters Not reported Excision of the tumor and nerve No recurrence observed two years post-surgery
Ueda et al[24] 37/M Body No clinical symptoms, discovered incidentally Well-defined unilocular radiolucency. Involvement of the inferior alveolar nerve canal No Not reported S-100 positive Segmental resection of the mandible. Repair using a free scapular flap No recurrence observed three years post-surgery
Papageorge et al[10] 4.5/M Ramus-infratemporal fossa Expansile lesion in the right mandible. Limited mouth opening, chin deviated to the left Well-defined unilocular radiolucency. Involvement of the inferior alveolar nerve canal No Not reported S-100 protein and vimentin positive Segmental resection of the mandible. Reconstruction using autologous rib cartilage graft No recurrence
Weaver et al[25] 22/F Body Swelling on the left side of the face Well-defined unilocular radiolucency No 5.0 cm × 3.0 cm S-100 positive Excision of the tumor and nerve. No recurrence observed six months post-surgery
Polak et al[26] 60/M Body No clinical symptoms discovered incidentally. When palpated, a crackling sensation can be felt, similar to the sound of breaking eggshells Unilocular radiolucency involving the mandibular canal No Not reported S-100 and anti-Leu positive Excision of the tumor and nerve No recurrence observed six years post-surgery
Papadopoulos et al[27] 15/M Body Swelling and mild pain in the left mandible Unilocular radiolucency near mental foramen No 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm Not reported Excision of the tumor and nerve No recurrence
Larsson et al[11] 25/F Body-ramus No clinical symptoms, discovered incidentally Well-defined large radiolucency. Involvement of the inferior alveolar nerve canal No 10 cm × 2.0 cm Not reported Excision of the tumor and nerve, with nerve end-to-end anastomosis No recurrence observed two years post-surgery
Larsson et al[11] 46/M Body Swelling and slow, intermittent pain in the left mandible Rounded, slightly radiopaque, well-circumscribed radiolucency No Diameter of 1 cm Not reported Remove all visibly abnormal tissues within the bone No recurrence observed five months post-surgery
Ellis et al[28] 41/F Body-ramus Swelling in the right mandible Poorly defined multilocular radiolucent lesion No Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
Ellis et al[28] 4/F Body A firm lump on the right mandible Well demarcated radiolucent lesion. Involvement of the inferior alveolar nerve canal No 2.5 cm × 1.6 cm Not reported Not reported No recurrence observed one-year post-surgery
Ellis et al[28] 8/M Body-angle Not reported Well demarcated radiolucent lesion with sclerotic borders No 6.0 cm × 4.0 cm Not reported Not reported No recurrence observed one-year post-surgery
Ellis et al[28] 23/F Body-ramus Swelling in the posterior area of the right mandible Radiolucent-radiopaque lesion with indistinct borders No Not reported Not reported Not reported Recurrence observed after 3 yr. Partial mandibulectomy performed
Ellis et al[28] 4/M Body Swelling in the right mandible Multilocular radiolucent lesion No Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
Cundy and Matukas[29] 55/F Body-angle Pain and swelling in the left mandible, accompanied by discomfort while chewing Unilocular radiolucency No Not reported Not reported Segmental resection of the mandible. Repair using a free iliac bone graft Not reported
Cassalia and Miller[30] 16/F Angle No clinical symptoms, discovered incidentally Multilocular radiolucency involving mandibular canal No Not reported Not reported Preservation of the nerve while removing the mass No recurrence observed six months post-surgery
Sharawy and Springer[31] 22/F Body-angle Intermittent numbness in the left mandible, with slight swelling on the cheek side Multilocular expansile radiolucency No Not reported Not reported Excision of the tumor and nerve. No recurrence observed thirteen months post-surgery
Gutman et al[32] 5/F Body Painless swelling in the left mandible Unilocular expansile radiolucency No 2 cm × 4 cm Not reported Excision of the tumor and nerve No recurrence observed sixteen months post-surgery
Gohel et al[12] 17/F Body A swollen lump on the gums of the lower right mandible Osteolytic radiolucent lesion No 4 cm × 1 cm Not reported Not reported Not reported
Johnson et al[9] 34/F Body Abnormal sensation on the left side of the lower lip and tenderness in the lower left jaw during biting Unilocular radiolucency No 2.5 cm × 1.5 cm Not reported Not reported Skin pigmentation observed six months later, followed by local recurrence two years post-surgery
CORNELL and VARGAS[33] 65/F Body Oral discomfort Ill-defined unilocular lesion with unclear borders Edentulous jaw Not reported Not reported Excision of the tumor and nerve No recurrence
BRUCE[34] 36/M Body A swelling on the alveolar ridge of the edentulous lower left jaw Well-defined radiolucency involving mandibular canal No 3 cm × 2 cm × 2 cm Not reported Not reported Not reported
Blackwood and Lucas[35] 41/M Body Swelling in the posterior area of the left mandible Unilocular radiolucency Yes 2 cm × 1.5 cm ×1 cm Not reported Simple excision of the mass Not reported

SMA: Smooth muscle actin; NF: Neurofilaments protein; EMA: Epithelial membrane antigen; STAT6: Signal transducer and activator of transcription 6; TLE: Temporal lobe epilepsy; HMB-45: Human melanoma black-45.

In the early stages, solitary intraosseous neurofibromas may not cause any symptoms; however, as the lesions grow, they can lead to expansion of the mandibular cortex. This expansion may occur with or without destruction and can result in pain, anesthesia, or paresthesia[8]. Further invasion of surrounding tissues may lead to abnormalities that alter mouth opening. However, the clinical symptoms lack specificity. This is the third reported case of a solitary intraosseous neurofibroma in the mandible with tooth root resorption. Therefore, the early diagnosis of solitary intraosseous neurofibromas without obvious symptoms is difficult. In contrast to mandibular cystic lesions, which often manifest as local swelling, loose teeth, and discomfort during biting, our patient presented with local numbness of the gums in the posterior mandibular region. Our initial neglect led to a diagnostic bias. Performing pulp vitality tests on the teeth involved in the lesion can also help identify neurofibromas. It should be noted that the clinical manifestations of non-chief complaint diseases in the adjacent teeth may affect judgments regarding the nature of the tumor, highlighting the need for improved accuracy in the clinical judgment of the chief complaint.

The imaging characteristics of solitary intraosseous neurofibromas typically show low-density unicystic or multicystic images with clear or unclear borders that lack specificity. However, these images may be closely related to those of the mandibular nerve canal. We have compiled a list of mandibular diseases that can easily be mistaken for solitary intraosseous neurofibromas (Table 2). The radiological appearance of this patient closely resembled periapical cysts, unicystic ameloblastoma (UA), and odontogenic keratocysts. Periapical cysts are inflammatory odontogenic cysts and are generally the most common type of jaw cysts. They are associated with the apex of non-vital teeth[9]. Radiographically, periapical cysts show well-defined unilocular radiolucency with sclerotic borders in close proximity to the adjacent teeth[36]. UA is a variant of ameloblastoma that presents as a cyst and shares clinical and radiological characteristics with odontogenic cysts. They appear as well-defined unilocular radiolucencies that often surround the crown of an impacted tooth[37]. In the present case, the impacted tooth crown was located outside the lesion. Compared to ameloblastomas, odontogenic keratocysts exhibit less prominent buccolingual expansion and less frequent and severe adjacent tooth root resorption. The presence of pasty fluid in odontogenic keratocysts can lead to areas of attenuation within the cystic cavity, resulting in uneven internal density on CT[38]. Papageorge et al[10] and Larsson et al[11] observed radiographic evidence of calcification in solitary intraosseous neurofibromas and proposed that this might be the result of high collagen content rather than genuine calcification. Odontogenic lesions in the mandible originate above the mandibular canal. Neural and vascular lesions mostly arise within the mandibular canal, whereas lesions centered below the mandibular canal are usually of non-odontogenic origin[12]. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully analyze the correlation between lesions and the inferior alveolar nerve canal. If the lesion involves the inferior alveolar nerve canal, it is essential to consider that the swelling may have a neural origin.

Table 2.

Differential diagnosis of benign lesions in the mandible

Disease
Age (year)
Sites
Radiographic Findings
Radicular (periapical) cysts In the 3rd to 5th decades of life Located at the apices of dead pulp teeth, caused by inflammation of the apical tissue due to caries or trauma Circular, unilocular low-density images at the apex of the tooth. Massive periapical cysts may cause root resorption, displacement of adjacent structures, and expansion
Dentigerous cysts In adolescents and young adults The upper canine and lower third molar Clear radiolucent image around the tooth crown with cortical border causing a significant displacement. Expansion and root resorption may be present. The cortical border is usually preserved
Simple bone cysts In the 2nd decades of life The posterior part of the mandible A radiolucency scalloping between the roots of the teeth
Odontogenic keratocysts In the 3rd decades of life The posterior part of the mandible Unilocular/multilocular lesions with scalloped margins. May present as radiolucent around the tooth crown. May lead to cortical thinning, tooth displacement, and root resorption
Ameloblastoma In the 3rd to 5th decades of life The posterior part of the mandible Well-defined unilocular/multilocular radiolucency. May appear as a pericoronal radiolucency. Extensive root resorption. Has a typical “soap bubble” appearance
Aneurysmal bone cyst In young adults The posterior part of the mandible A unilocular or multilocular radiolucency with cortical expansion
Central giant cell granuloma In adolescents and young adults The anterior part of the mandible Mandibular border is clearly defined. Radiolucent with granular calcifications. May cause tooth displacement, root absorption, destruction of cortical plates, and invasion into surrounding soft tissues. Early-stage lesions: Small unilocular areas (similar to odontogenic cysts). Progressive stage: Multilocularity with sparse internal septa and bone expansion
Schwannomas Most often in the 4th and 5th decades The posterior part of the mandible Radiolucent, unilocular,homogeneous, and well-defined lesions with cortical expansion
Neurofibromas In adolescents and young adults The posterior part of the mandible Low-density unicystic or multicystic images with clear or unclear borders. They can expand and penetrate the boundary of the dermis. Tooth root absorption and tooth displacement may also occur. Fusiform enlargement of the mandibular canal
Central hemangioma In the 2nd decades of life It mainly occurs in the spine. The mandible is a very rare location, with the posterior part of the mandible being slightly more common Unilocular or multilocular lesion, with large bone marrow spaces and rough trabeculae formation. Accompanied by a typical honeycomb or soap-bubble appearance. When it occurs within the inferior alveolar canal, the canal was wider than normal
Arteriovenous malformation In the 1st decades of life They are uncommon lesions of the head and neck. The majority of jaw lesions occur in the mandibular ramus and body May appear cystic due to adjacent bone resorption. May appear multilocular. When located within the inferior alveolar canal, the canal can enlarge throughout the entire course
Lymphoma Most patients aged between 40 and 60 yr Mandibular body Radiolucent pattern with non-transmitted radiation particles and reactive bone attachment. May cause “moth-eaten” appearance, lamellar bone formation in periosteum, widening of mandibular canal, irregular increase in periodontal ligament width, and tooth spacing

Histologically, solitary neurofibromas originate from the nerves and are composed of Schwann cells, perineural cells, endoneural fibroblasts, and intermediate cells[39,40]. They have well-defined boundaries with the surrounding connective tissue, distinguishing them from the multiple neurofibromas observed in cases of neurofibromatosis[3]. It is crucial to perform S-100 and CD34 immunostaining on biopsy samples. In neurofibromas, tumor cells are loosely arranged and fragile, often with wavy or snake-shaped nuclei, and S-100 protein-positive cells are less common than in schwannomas[41]. The final pathological diagnosis should be based on the presence of CD34, which is located in the cell membrane and cytoplasm. CD34 positivity is observed in neurofibromas but not in schwannomas[42].

Surgical resection is currently the primary treatment for solitary intramedullary intraosseous neurofibromas. However, there have been no reports of adjuvant therapy, and the local recurrence rate of neurofibromas is higher than that of schwannomas, possibly because of the lack of an envelope[43]. This makes complete tumor removal more challenging, and the affected nerve is sacrificed during radical resection of neurofibromas[8]. While neurofibromas may progress to neurofibromatosis or undergo malignant transformation as the primary disease[44,45], the likelihood of solitary neurofibromas becoming malignant is quite low compared to that of neurofibromatosis[46]. The possible development of this disease emphasizes the importance of regular monitoring for patients with early neurofibroma symptoms. Our patient showed no signs of recurrence or progression to neurofibromatosis nine months after surgery. In the future, we will continue to monitor these patients.

CONCLUSION

In this report, we detail the case of a 37-year-old female with tooth root resorption and local sensory abnormalities in the right mandible, indicative of a solitary intraosseous neurofibroma. While pathological examination remains the primary diagnostic method for intraosseous neurofibroma, clinicians must carefully examine the patient’s symptoms and observe the relationship between the lesion and inferior alveolar nerve canal. An accurate distinction between cystic lesions and neurogenic tumors in the mandible is crucial for early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Following surgical intervention, patients with solitary neurofibromas of the mandible should undergo long-term follow-up due to the potential for local recurrence and malignant transformation of these tumors.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are very grateful to the patient for providing informed consent for publication after being informed.

Footnotes

Informed consent statement: Informed written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Peer-review started: July 21, 2023

First decision: August 4, 2023

Article in press: August 31, 2023

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Park HK, South Korea; Yarmahmoodi F, Iran S-Editor: Qu XL L-Editor: A P-Editor: Xu ZH

Contributor Information

Zheng Zhang, School of Stomatology, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, Guizhou Province, China; Department of Stomatology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China.

Xia Hong, Department of Stomatology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China.

Feng Wang, Department of Stomatology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China.

Xin Ye, Department of Stomatology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China.

You-Dan Yao, Department of Stomatology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China.

Ying Yin, Department of Pathology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China.

Hong-Yu Yang, School of Stomatology, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, Guizhou Province, China; Department of Stomatology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China. yanghongyu@pkuszh.com.

References

  • 1.Depprich R, Singh DD, Reinecke P, Kübler NR, Handschel J. Solitary submucous neurofibroma of the mandible: review of the literature and report of a rare case. Head Face Med. 2009;5:24. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-5-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ferner RE, Huson SM, Thomas N, Moss C, Willshaw H, Evans DG, Upadhyaya M, Towers R, Gleeson M, Steiger C, Kirby A. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2007;44:81–88. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.045906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wright BA, Jackson D. Neural tumors of the oral cavity. A review of the spectrum of benign and malignant oral tumors of the oral cavity and jaws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980;49:509–522. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(80)90075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mori H, Kakuta S, Yamaguchi A, Nagumo M. Solitary intraosseous neurofibroma of the maxilla: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;51:688–690. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80271-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kamalakaran A, Jayaraman B, Raghavendran S, Thirunavukkarasu R, Ayyappan M, Syed JBAB. Intraosseous Neurofibroma of Mandible in a 5-Year-Old: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022;21:1336–1342. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01597-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sarkar DF, Mishra N, Pati D, Samal SK. Solitary Neurofibroma of Mandible in a 2-Year-Old Child: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022;21:1320–1325. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01670-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vivek N, Manikandhan R, James PC, Rajeev R. Solitary intraosseous neurofibroma of mandible. Indian J Dent Res. 2006;17:135–138. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.29874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Apostolidis C, Anterriotis D, Rapidis AD, Angelopoulos AP. Solitary intraosseous neurofibroma of the inferior alveolar nerve: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:232–235. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.20508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Johnson NR, Gannon OM, Savage NW, Batstone MD. Frequency of odontogenic cysts and tumors: a systematic review. J Investig Clin Dent. 2014;5:9–14. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Papageorge MB, Doku HC, Lis R. Solitary neurofibroma of the mandible and infratemporal fossa in a young child. Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;73:407–411. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(92)90315-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Larsson A, Praetorius F, Hjörting-Hansen E. Intraosseous neurofibroma of the jaws. Int J Oral Surg. 1978;7:494–499. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(78)80043-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gohel A, Villa A, Sakai O. Benign Jaw Lesions. Dent Clin North Am. 2016;60:125–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2015.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Behrad S, Sohanian S, Ghanbarzadegan A. Solitary intraosseous neurofibroma of the mandible: Report of an extremely rare histopathologic feature. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2020;63:276–278. doi: 10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_28_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Iqbal A, Tamgadge S, Tamgadge A, Chande M. Intraosseous neurofibroma in a 13-year-old male patient: A case report with review of literature. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14:712–715. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.176173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Inoue T, Elaskary M, Shima A, Hirai H, Suzuki F, Matsuda M. Trigeminal neurofibroma in the infratemporal fossa arising from the inferior alveolar nerve: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017;7:825–829. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Narang BR, Palaskar SJ, Bartake AR, Pawar RB, Rongte S. Intraosseous Neurofibroma of the Mandible: A Case Report and Review of Literature. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:ZD06–ZD08. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22591.9173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fortier K. Solitary Intraosseous Mandibular Neurofibroma: Clinical Case Study 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gujjar PK, Hallur JM, Patil ST, Dakshinamurthy SM, Chande M, Pereira T, Zingade J. The Solitary Variant of Mandibular Intraosseous Neurofibroma: Report of a Rare Entity. Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:520261. doi: 10.1155/2015/520261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saravani S, Kadeh H, Nosratzehi T. Solitary intraosseous neurofibroma of the mandible. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2014;16 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jangam SS, Ingole SN, Deshpande MD, Ranadive PA. Solitary intraosseous neurofibroma: Report of a unique case. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014;5:561–563. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.142833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Deichler J, Martínez R, Niklander S, Seguel H, Marshall M, Esguep A. Solitary intraosseous neurofibroma of the mandible. Apropos of a case. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e704–e707. doi: 10.4317/medoral.16853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tao Q, Wang Y, Zheng C. Neurofibroma in the left mandible: a case report. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2010;26:217–221. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(10)70032-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Alatli C, Oner B, Unür M, Erseven G. Solitary plexiform neurofibroma of the oral cavity A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;25:379–380. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(06)80036-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ueda M, Suzuki H, Kaneda T. Solitary intraosseous neurofibroma of the mandible: report of a case. Nagoya J Med Sci. 1993;55:97–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Weaver BD, Graves RW, Keyes GG, Lattanzi DA. Central neurofibroma of the mandible: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:1243–1246. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90428-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Polak M, Polak G, Brocheriou C, Vigneul J. Solitary neurofibroma of the mandible: case report and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;47:65–68. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(89)90127-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Papadopoulos H, Zachariades N, Angelopoulos AP. Neurofibroma of the mandible. Review of the literature and report of a case. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:293–297. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80074-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ellis GL, Abrams AM, Melrose RJ. Intraosseous benign neural sheath neoplasms of the jaws. Report of seven new cases and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977;44:731–743. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(77)90383-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cundy RL, Matukas VJ. Solitary intraosseous neurofibroma of the mandible. Arch Otolaryngol. 1972;96:81–83. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1972.00770090119018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cassalia PT, Miller AS. Solitary central neurofibroma of the mandible. Br J Oral Surg. 1971;8:270–272. doi: 10.1016/s0007-117x(70)80090-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sharawy A, Springer J. Central neurofibroma occurring in the mandible. Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1968;25:817–821. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(68)90153-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gutman D, Griffel B, Munk J, Shohat S. Solitary neurofibroma of the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1964;17:1–9. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(64)90304-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cornell CF, Vargas HA. Intraosseous neurofibroma of the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1955;8:34–39. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(55)90128-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bruce KW. Solitary neurofibroma (neurilemmoma, schwannoma) of the oral cavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1954;7:1150–1159. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(54)90307-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Blackwood HJ, Lucas RB. Neurofibroma of the mandible. Proc R Soc Med. 1951;44:864–865. doi: 10.1177/003591575104401005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yoshiura K, Weber AL, Runnels S, Scrivani SJ. Cystic lesions of the mandible and maxilla. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2003;13:485–494. doi: 10.1016/s1052-5149(03)00035-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bilodeau EA, Collins BM. Odontogenic Cysts and Neoplasms. Surg Pathol Clin. 2017;10:177–222. doi: 10.1016/j.path.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yoshiura K, Higuchi Y, Ariji Y, Shinohara M, Yuasa K, Nakayama E, Ban S, Kanda S. Increased attenuation in odontogenic keratocysts with computed tomography: a new finding. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994;23:138–142. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.23.3.7530666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ide F, Shimoyama T, Horie N, Kusama K. Comparative ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study of perineurioma and neurofibroma of the oral mucosa. Oral Oncol. 2004;40:948–953. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gómez-Oliveira G, Fernández-Alba Luengo J, Martín-Sastre R, Patiño-Seijas B, López-Cedrún-Cembranos JL. Plexiform neurofibroma of the cheek mucosa. A case report. Med Oral. 2004;9:263–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Taketomi T, Nakamura K, Teratani Y, Matsuo K, Kusukawa J. Solitary Neurofibroma of the Hard Palate: A Case Report and Literature Review. Am J Case Rep. 2021;22:e929674. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.929674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chaubal A, Paetau A, Zoltick P, Miettinen M. CD34 immunoreactivity in nervous system tumors. Acta Neuropathol. 1994;88:454–458. doi: 10.1007/BF00389498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gnepp DR, Keyes GG. Central neurofibromas of the mandible: report of two cases. J Oral Surg. 1981;39:125–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.D'Ambrosio JA, Langlais RP, Young RS. Jaw and skull changes in neurofibromatosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988;66:391–396. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(88)90252-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hustin J, Delire Y. Unusual intramandibular neural tumor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991;71:593–596. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(91)90369-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Abell MR, Hart WR, Olson JR. Tumors of the peripheral nervous system. Hum Pathol. 1970;1:503–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Clinical Cases are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES