Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1995 Oct;49(5):513–517. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.5.513

Measuring quality of life in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke: a feasibility study of four questionnaires in The Netherlands.

M C Visser 1, P J Koudstaal 1, R A Erdman 1, J W Deckers 1, J Passchier 1, J van Gijn 1, D E Grobbee 1
PMCID: PMC1060156  PMID: 7499995

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To test in patients with a history of myocardial infarction or stroke the feasibility of four quality of life measurements--the Nottingham health profile (NHP), the heart patients psychological questionnaire (HPPQ), the sickness impact profile (SIP), and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD). DESIGN--Subjects were tested and retested after an interval of 14 days: questionnaires were self assessed. SUBJECTS--Participants were randomly selected from the Rotterdam stroke data bank (stroke patients; n = 16, mean (SD) age 66.0 (11.0) years and from the population based Rotterdam study (myocardial infarction; n = 20, mean (SD) age 72.7 (7.9) years, controls; n = 17, mean (SD) age 72.8 (7.3) years. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Mean (SD) administration times for the NHP, HPPQ, SIP, and HAD were 7.9 (3.5), 10.5 (4.3), 21.0 (9.8), and 5.5 (2.8) minutes respectively. On average, the test-retest reliability was good, with Spearman correlations ranging from 0.31 to 0.95. In spite of the limited size of the study, all instruments were able to show differences between the study groups. For instance, median SIP total scores for myocardial infarction and stroke patients were 12.4 (interquartile range 7.0-19.1) and 11.4 (5.9-15.4) respectively, compared with 7.7 (3.7-11.3) in the control group (p values of 0.04 and 0.14 respectively). CONCLUSIONS--This study suggests that use of the four instruments tested may be feasible and reliable for assessing aspects of quality of life in patients with a history of a myocardial infarction or stroke.

Full text

PDF
513

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergner L., Bergner M., Hallstrom A. P., Eisenberg M., Cobb L. A. Health status of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest six months later. Am J Public Health. 1984 May;74(5):508–510. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.5.508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergner L., Hallstrom A. P., Bergner M., Eisenberg M. S., Cobb L. A. Health status of survivors of cardiac arrest and of myocardial infarction controls. Am J Public Health. 1985 Nov;75(11):1321–1323. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.11.1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergner M., Bobbitt R. A., Carter W. B., Gilson B. S. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981 Aug;19(8):787–805. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergner M., Bobbitt R. A., Kressel S., Pollard W. E., Gilson B. S., Morris J. R. The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv. 1976;6(3):393–415. doi: 10.2190/RHE0-GGH4-410W-LA17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonsel G. J., Erdman R. A., van der Mast R. C., Balk A. H., van der Maas P. J. Psychosociale aspecten van harttransplantatie; 4 jaar ervaring. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990 Feb 3;134(5):227–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caine N., Harrison S. C., Sharples L. D., Wallwork J. Prospective study of quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting. BMJ. 1991 Mar 2;302(6775):511–516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6775.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Haan R., Horn J., Limburg M., Van Der Meulen J., Bossuyt P. A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality of life. Stroke. 1993 Aug;24(8):1178–1181. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.8.1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fletcher A. E., Dickinson E. J., Philp I. Review: audit measures: quality of life instruments for everyday use with elderly patients. Age Ageing. 1992 Mar;21(2):142–150. doi: 10.1093/ageing/21.2.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Granger C. V., Cotter A. C., Hamilton B. B., Fiedler R. C. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Feb;74(2):133–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hofman A., Grobbee D. E., de Jong P. T., van den Ouweland F. A. Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: the Rotterdam Elderly Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 1991 Jul;7(4):403–422. doi: 10.1007/BF00145007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hunt S. M., McEwen J., McKenna S. P. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 Apr;35(273):185–188. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hunt S. M., McKenna S. P., McEwen J., Backett E. M., Williams J., Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980 Dec;34(4):281–286. doi: 10.1136/jech.34.4.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johansson B. B., Jadbäck G., Norrving B., Widner H., Wiklund I. Evaluation of long-term functional status in first-ever stroke patients in a defined population. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1992;26:105–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levin L. A., Jönsson B. Cost-effectiveness of thrombolysis--a randomized study of intravenous rt-PA in suspected myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1992 Jan;13(1):2–8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lewis G., Wessely S. Comparison of the General Health Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;157:860–864. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.6.860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Miettinen O. S. Quality of life from the epidemiologic perspective. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):641–643. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90028-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Permanyer-Miralda G., Alonso J., Antó J. M., Alijarde-Guimerá M., Soler-Soler J. Comparison of perceived health status and conventional functional evaluation in stable patients with coronary artery disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(8):779–786. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90130-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Robinson R. G., Price T. R. Post-stroke depressive disorders: a follow-up study of 103 patients. Stroke. 1982 Sep-Oct;13(5):635–641. doi: 10.1161/01.str.13.5.635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Visser M. C., Fletcher A. E., Parr G., Simpson A., Bulpitt C. J. A comparison of three quality of life instruments in subjects with angina pectoris: the Sickness Impact Profile, the Nottingham Health Profile, and the Quality of Well Being Scale. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;47(2):157–163. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wade D. T., Legh-Smith J., Hewer R. A. Depressed mood after stroke. A community study of its frequency. Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Aug;151:200–205. doi: 10.1192/bjp.151.2.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wiklund I., Herlitz J., Hjalmarson A. Quality of life five years after myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1989 May;10(5):464–472. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. de Haan R., Aaronson N., Limburg M., Hewer R. L., van Crevel H. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke. 1993 Feb;24(2):320–327. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.2.320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES