Abstract
Objectives
Review of the current and relevant literature to develop a list of evidence‐based recommendations that can be implemented in head and neck surgical practices. To provide rationale for the multiple aspects of comprehensive care for head and neck surgical patients. To improve postsurgical outcomes for head and neck surgical patients.
Methods
Extensive review of the medical literature was performed and relevant studies in both the head and neck surgery and other surgical specialties were considered for inclusion.
Results
A total of 18 aspects of perioperative care were included in this review. The literature search included 276 publications considered to be the most relevant and up to date evidence. Each topic is concluded with recommendation grade and quality of evidence for the recommendation.
Conclusion
Since it's conception, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have continued to push for comprehensive and evidence based postsurgical care to improve patient outcomes. Head and neck oncology is one of the newest fields to develop a protocol. Due to the complexity of this patient population and their postsurgical needs, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to facilitate recovery while minimizing complications. Current and future advances in head and neck cancer research will serve to strengthen and add new principles to a comprehensive ERAS protocol.
Level of Evidence
2a.
Keywords: enhanced recovery after surgery, head and neck oncology, free tissue transfer, outcomes, evidence‐based medicine
Short abstract
Since it's conception, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have continued to push for comprehensive and evidence based postsurgical care to improve patient outcomes. Head and neck oncology is one of the newest fields to develop a protocol. Due to the complexity of this patient population and their postsurgical needs, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to facilitate recovery while minimizing complications. This article summarizes current and future principles in head and neck ERAS protocols.
1. INTRODUCTION
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols were conceived in the 1990s to standardize care through evidence‐based practice. 1 These protocols improve outcomes and decrease healthcare costs. 2 , 3 , 4 Since the original protocols were developed for colorectal surgery, 5 ERAS protocols have become standard practice in a majority of surgical and surgical adjacent fields. 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 Over the past two decades, a growing body of evidence indicates the implementation of ERAS protocols improve patient outcomes including fewer complications, reduced length of hospital stay (LOS), earlier return to normal activities, and reduced opioid use. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 In 2017, the first head and neck protocol was published, providing the framework for a multimodal pathway specific for patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery. 17
HNC and its treatment pose unique challenges to patients due to the innate anatomy and its role in function and appearance. A multidisciplinary approach is required to adequately address the significant changes to the speech, swallowing, breathing, feeding, and appearance of the patient as well as the physical and psychological toll of treatment. 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 The complexity of care required for these patients lends the potential for vast improvements in perioperative management. In recent years, there has been an increase in publications showing improved outcomes in HNC patients after introducing ERAS protocols. 17 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25
This review is a comprehensive summary of the current and evolving areas of multidisciplinary optimization at all phases of care for the HNC patient, from diagnosis to discharge.
1.1. Literature search
Relevant “head and neck cancer” publications were searched through the PubMed database and included articles were published through September 2022. Included search terms were “enhanced recovery after surgery,” “head and neck surgery,” “total laryngectomy (TL),” “free‐flap reconstruction,” “oral cavity cancer,” and variations of these and other terms. Primary searches for high‐level evidence in head and neck surgery were vetted for inclusion. When lacking in the HNC literature, high‐level evidence of non‐head and neck surgery was included if deemed to be applicable across fields.
1.2. Quality of data
Centre for evidence‐based medicine criteria were used to analyze the quality of evidence presented in the literature. 26 Levels of evidence characterized by “high” included systematic reviews, meta‐analyses, or large randomized controlled trials. Moderate level was assigned to smaller randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. “Low” was assigned to retrospective data. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system was used to assign strength to the recommendations. 27 Strength was classified as strong, weak, or conditional. Strong was assigned to recommendations with high quality evidence, or with low quality evidence with a high benefit‐to‐risk ratio. Weak was assigned to recommendations with low quality evidence, or uncertain benefit. Conditional was assigned to recommendations with low quality evidence and a perceived benefit.
2. RESULTS
A total of 18 aspects of perioperative care were included in this review. The literature search included 276 publications considered to be the most relevant and up to date evidence. Each topic is concluded with recommendation grade and quality of evidence for the recommendation.
2.1. Preadmission education
HNC involves intricate anatomy and treatment often has functional consequences. Patient education on disease processes and treatment expectations has been recognized as an important part of informed consent. Preoperative education has been shown to reduce anxiety and improve patient satisfaction and involvement in decision‐making. 28 , 29 Traditionally, patient education is provided exclusively during the clinic visit. However, studies have shown that retention and comprehension after these visits can be as low as 20%. 30 , 31 Providers have addressed this through pamphlets and written materials, which are easy to produce and replicate. The HNC population has a disproportionately low literacy rate, with some studies quoting 30% of patients being unable to read above an eighth grade level. 32 , 33 This unique consideration begs a better solution. With widespread access to technology, multimedia education has become a popular option in the education of complex disease and treatment processes. 34 Studies have shown that access to multimedia education improves patient satisfaction, 35 , 36 , 37 recall of risks, 38 and reduces rates of anxiety and depression. 39 , 40 D'Souza et al. found that multimodal patient education significantly decreased rates of clinical anxiety and depression after diagnosis for late stage HNC patients for up to 6 and 3 months, respectively. 40 The same group found that multimedia education for the caregivers of HNC patients may carry the same benefits. 41 While there are clear psychological benefits to improving patient education, until recently, there were no publications in the HNC literature showing improved surgical outcomes from education intervention. Schmid et al. recently found shorter LOS, reduced complications, and decreased cost after implementation of a preoperative multi‐professional assessment and information day (MUPAID). 42 At this time, it is unknown which aspect of the MUPAID resulted in these improvements. Further studies are needed to corroborate a benefit with postoperative recovery and preoperative education.
2.2. Recommendations
|
High | Strong |
|
High | Strong |
|
Moderate | Strong |
2.3. Preadmission speech and language pathology assessment
HNC patients often have functional changes in speech, breathing, and swallowing from the disease process and its subsequent treatment. Pretreatment speech and language pathology (SLP) evaluation of speech, voice, and swallow has been employed for decades in the HNC population. 43 Pretreatment swallowing exercises have been shown to improve swallowing outcomes for HNC patients undergoing primary chemoradiation; however, this is not studied in the context of surgery. 44 , 45 For patients undergoing surgery, pretreatment counseling concerning the expected functional and physiologic changes is paramount to the patient's understanding and expectations. In a retrospective review by Shenson et al., pretreatment SLP counseling reduced LOS post TL by an average of 3 days without affecting 30‐day readmissions or emergency department visits. 46 This study reflects findings in the orthopedic and surgical oncology literature that pretreatment counseling reduces LOS and overall cost. 47 , 48 A small randomized trial by Longobardi et al. showed that pre‐laryngectomy counseling by SLP increased patient satisfaction scores, decreased psychological distress, and facilitated greater use and acceptance of tracheoesophageal speech. 49 SLP counseling was included in the MUPAID protocol and may have played a contributory role in the improved outcomes. 42
2.4. Recommendation
|
High | Strong |
|
Low | Conditional |
|
High | Strong |
2.5. Preadmission tobacco and alcohol cessation counseling and treatment
While tobacco smoking rates continue to decline worldwide, HNC patients continue to carry this risk factor at a higher rate than the general population. Perioperative tobacco use has been associated with higher rates of intra and postoperative cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, and infectious complications. 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 Wound healing is also impacted by perioperative tobacco use increasing the rates of wound dehiscence, infection, and need for reoperation. 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 For HNC patients, persistent smoking is associated with higher rates of recurrence, second primaries, decreased response to radiation therapy (RT), and decreased overall survival (OS). 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 While all data points to earlier cessation leading to better outcomes for surgical patients, cessation of at least 4 weeks prior to surgery has been found to decrease surgical site infections (SSIs). 66 , 67 Effective smoking cessation strategies and techniques continue to pose a large problem for HNC providers and patients. 68 A randomized control trial by Park et al. showed a 13% increase in tobacco abstinence in cancer patients who received sustained counseling and an approved cessation medication compared to those with short term counseling and medication advice. 69 A combination of nicotine replacement therapy with counseling has been shown to increase cessation rates among HNC patients. 70 Due to high rates of concomitant alcohol use disorder, and depression among HNC patients who smoke, the data suggests tobacco cessation rates improve when other comorbidities are treated in conjunction. 71 , 72 Guidelines in tobacco cessation for patients include a multifaceted approach of counseling, nicotine replacement, and pharmacologic intervention. 66 , 73 Perioperative alcohol use has been shown to increase rates of postoperative infections, delirium, withdrawal, wound dehiscence, bleeding, cardiopulmonary complications, and neurological complications. 74 Abstinence from tobacco and alcohol for 6–8 weeks prior to surgery has been shown to decrease incidence of postoperative morbidity by up to 50%. 74 , 75
2.6. Recommendations
|
High | Strong |
|
High | Strong |
|
High | Strong |
|
High | Strong |
2.7. Preadmission nutrition optimization
Up to 50% of HNC patients are considered malnourished. 76 , 77 HNC patients are at increased risk of pretreatment malnutrition due to the inherent location of tumors involving the upper aerodigestive tract as well as increased risk factors of alcohol use and smoking. 76 , 78 Malnutrition at the time of surgery is associated with increased wound complications, bleeding and transfusions, pulmonary complications, delirium, refeeding syndrome, LOS, and mortality. 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 Nutritional status should be evaluated via a validated nutritional assessment tool from the time of diagnosis in patients with HNC. Nutritional risk index has been validated in HNC patients and considers serum albumin levels and weight loss. 76 , 86 Early identification of malnourished patients and those at high risk to become malnourished should prompt a timely intervention including involvement of a trained dietician. 87 According to the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism guideline, preoperative nutritional support should be initiated in any patient found to have >10% weight loss in the previous 6 months, BMI <18.5, malnutrition found on a validated screening tool, albumin <30 g/l, or inability to consume >50% of their recommended intake for more than 7 days. The guideline recommends that nutritional support should be maintained for 7–14 days, even if surgery must be delayed to reduce postoperative complications precipitated by malnutrition. 88 Enteral feeding should be considered in carefully selected patients who are unable to meet adequate oral intake requirements. 89 Immunonutrition supplements such as arginine, glutamine, ribonucleotides, and omega‐3 fatty acids have been considered a potential area for improvement with promising results in surgical patients. 90 , 91 , 92 In the HNC population, preoperative immunonutrition has been shown to decrease postoperative fistula rates by up to 50% and LOS by up to 1 week. 93 , 94 , 95 Preoperative fasting is no longer recommended for all patients, the updated guidelines allow for clear liquids up to 2 h prior to induction. 96 Preoperative carbohydrate loading with 800 ml the night before surgery and 400 ml 2 h before surgery has been shown to decrease LOS and does not increase the risk of aspiration. 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 Preoperative carbohydrate loading has been shown to decrease insulin resistance, complications, and pain in the postoperative state. 101 , 102 , 103
2.8. Recommendations
| Early and frequent nutritional assessment should be performed on all patients with a diagnosis of HNC. | High | Strong |
| Nutritional support and dietician referral should be offered to any patients who meet criteria or are at risk for under or malnutrition. | High | Strong |
| Nutrition optimization and support should be prioritized for 2 weeks prior to surgery. | High | Strong |
| Immunonutrition supplementation is safe and may improve outcomes. | High | Conditional |
| Carbohydrate loading up to 2 h before surgery improves postoperative outcomes. | High | Strong |
2.9. Preadmission sarcopenia management
Up to 70% of HNC patients are sarcopenic. 104 Sarcopenia is defined clinically as decreased skeletal muscle mass with either low strength and/or low performance. 105 Radiologically, it is defined as low skeletal muscle mass at the level of C3 on CT. 106 , 107 Sarcopenia has previously been associated with worse OS in patients with solid tumors. 108 Preoperative sarcopenia in HNC patients has been associated with severe complications resulting in increased LOS and mortality. 109 Sarcopenia is associated with earlier postoperative complications such as fistula development, venous thromboembolism (VTE), blood transfusions, LOS, delirium, discharge to post‐acute care facilities, and readmission. 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 Sarcopenia is associated with worse OS and disease‐free survival in HNC. 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 Evaluation of sarcopenia should be done during the first clinic visit with a validated screening tool such as hand grip strength or chair rise test. 105 , 122 , 123 Early detection and intervention on sarcopenia may improve patient outcomes. 124 In patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, prehabilitation in the form of structured exercise is associated with decreased LOS and postoperative complication rates. 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 Following the recommendation of the Society of Sarcopenia, Cachexia, and Wasting Disorders, sarcopenic patients should be instructed to undergo progressive resistance training two to three times a week to increase muscle mass and function. This can be self‐directed or under the instruction of a physical therapist. 129 , 130 , 131
2.10. Recommendations
| Preoperative sarcopenia assessment using validated skeletal muscle mass at the level of C3 in conjunction with either hand grip test or chair stand test should be performed for all patients with a diagnosis of HNC. | Moderate | Conditional |
| Progressive resistance training is safe and effective in increasing muscle mass and function of patients with sarcopenia. | High | Strong |
| Increased muscle mass and function can improve surgical outcomes. | High | Strong |
| Addition of a HNC physical therapist to the multidisciplinary team may increase compliance with exercise routine. | Moderate | Strong |
2.11. Preadmission depression management
There is a wide range of reported major depressive disorder (MDD) rates among patients diagnosed with HNC, with studies quoting between 6 and 52%. 132 , 133 The increased instance of emotional distress is most commonly due to the associated functional impairment of speaking, breathing, and swallowing along with facial disfigurement. 134 , 135 Of the medically ill population, HNC patients have among the highest rates of suicide. 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 MDD is typically diagnosed within the first few months following diagnosis of HNC. 133 MDD adversely affects multiple aspects of a patient's recovery including OS, LOS, compliance with treatment, self‐care abilities, as well as quality of life (QoL). 20 , 133 , 141 , 142 , 143 Due to the well‐known adverse effects of depression in HNC patients, the landmark PROTECT trial out of the University of Nebraska was the first to show efficacy of prophylactic escitalopram in the prevention of MDD in HNC patients by up to 50%. 144 Since then, a secondary analysis has been published which established criteria for baseline characteristics of patients that would benefit from prophylactic treatment. 145 They found that patients with baseline depressive symptoms, determined by a score of 4 or greater on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology‐Self Report (QIDS‐SR), or those who were to undergo primary RT would have the highest reduction in MDD development. Interestingly, not only did the incidence of MDD during treatment decrease in this population but patients reported sustained benefit after cessation of the drug for up to 3 months. Due to the high benefit and low risk profile of escitalopram, the authors proposed lowering the QIDS‐SR prophylaxis threshold to 2 in order to benefit the maximum number of patients. These data show the importance and value of depression screening for the HNC population.
2.12. Recommendations
| All patients should be screened for depression from time of diagnosis and at each additional clinical visit. | High | Strong |
| Patients should be started on prophylactic escitalopram if they meet baseline criteria of QIDS‐SR score of 2, or if they are treated with primary RT. | Moderate | Strong |
2.13. Preoperative multimodal analgesia
Pain associated with HNC surgery can be nociceptive, neuropathic, psychogenic, idiopathic, or a combination of the above. The value of treating pain through multiple pathways has been recognized since the early 1990s and has become a keystone in complex pain management. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) incorporates a variety of non‐opioid based pain treatments and allows for flexibility in practice based on the individual patients' comorbidities, allergies, disease process, and other medications. Preoperative MMA administration has been shown to effectively reduce the need for postoperative pain scores, opioid use, as well as hospital stays in the HNC literature and other surgical fields. 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 Common elements of preoperative MMA include acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxants, local anesthetics, and GABA analogues. 152 In a study by Vu et al., a single preoperative dose of ≥1 celecoxib, gabapentin, and/or tramadol has been associated with decreased opioid use both in the operating room and in PACU as well as shorter PACU stay in patients undergoing HNC surgery. 23 Chiu et al. demonstrated that a single dose of preoperative gabapentin in patients undergoing tongue resection and anterolateral free flap decreased postoperative pain scores, opioid use, sedation, and antiemetic use. 153 Many preoperative MMA protocols include 1–3 days of preoperative analgesia administration with the last dose up to 2 h prior to surgery. Opioid sparing preoperative analgesia is effective for patients who are opioid naive; however, for patients already taking opioids, these medications should be continued and a referral to a designated pain management specialist should be considered.
2.14. Recommendations
| Preoperative opioid‐sparing pain management should be incorporated into the surgical plan for patients undergoing surgery. | High | Strong |
| Scheduled singular or combinations of acetaminophen, celecoxib, gabapentin, ibuprofen, and tramadol should be considered for inclusion in the perioperative pain regimen for HNC patients. | Moderate | Strong |
| Modifications for doses and medications should be individualized based on the patient's past medical history, allergies, age, and other medications. | High | Strong |
2.15. Intraoperative euvolemia and vasopressor use
Fluid overload is a known risk factor for complications of head and neck reconstructive surgery. 154 Anesthesiologists have previously been tasked with maintaining hemodynamic stability without the adjunct of vasopressors due to the perceived compromise of pedicled and free flap survival. 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 There is a growing body of evidence from more recent studies showing that vasopressors, when necessary, do not compromise free flap survival. 158 Fluid administration is used to maximize stroke volume and treat hypovolemia. 159 Goal directed therapy (GDT) is used to maximize oxygen delivery and hemodynamic parameters while maintaining euvolemia. 160 GDT reduces mortality, rates of respiratory failure, prolonged intubation, pneumonia, wound infections, sepsis, and kidney injury. 161 Intraoperative crystalloid administration of 130 ml/kg/24 h or greater than 7 L is an independent factor of major postoperative medical complications. 60 , 162 Farwell et al. showed increased surgical complications associated with higher intraoperative fluid volumes. 163 A cutoff of 5500 ml was found to be predictive of increased complications, both medical and surgical. 164 Dooley et al. showed that the negative outcomes associated with excess fluid administration should be expanded to fluid given in PACU as this fluid was found to be an independent variable in increasing LOS. 165
2.16. Recommendations
| Judicious administration of intraoperative fluids should be employed for patients undergoing HNC surgery and reconstruction throughout the entire perioperative period. | High | Strong |
| Intraoperative vasopressors, when necessary, are safe in free flap reconstruction surgery. | Low | Conditional |
2.17. Intraoperative normothermia
Intraoperative hypothermia, defined as a core body temperature <36°C, is a common adverse event during general anesthesia as the body is unable to regulate its own temperature. 166 Methods to increase core body temperature in the perioperative period include warmed intravenous fluids, decreased cutaneous exposure, warming blankets and mattresses, and warmed humidified oxygen administration. 166 Despite these technologies, Moola et al. showed that incidence of inadvertent hypothermia is up to 90% greater than hyperthermia. 167 Intraoperative hypothermia has been associated with several surgical and postsurgical complications including coagulopathies, blood loss, need for blood transfusion, increased LOS, SSI, and increased mortality. 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 Previous studies have shown that hypothermia during free flap reconstruction reduces flap survival which is thought to be due to vasoconstriction. 174 In the head and neck literature, intraoperative hypothermia has been linked to delayed time to extubation, increased neck seromas, and wound dehiscence. 175 Sumer et al. found that hypothermia <35° in patients, regardless of length of hypothermic event, had a fivefold increase in both infectious and overall complications. 176 Minimum core body temperature of <36° has been shown to increase flap loss, arterial thrombosis, and hospital LOS in free flap surgery. 177
2.18. Recommendations
| Temperature monitoring is necessary to ensure normothermia is maintained intraoperatively. | High | Strong |
| In the perioperative period, minimum core body temperature of the patient should be between 36 and 36.5. | Moderate | Strong |
| Multiple well established warming methods can reduce inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia. | High | Strong |
2.19. Postoperative extubation
Extubation following free flap placement for reconstruction following HNC resection has often been delayed to prevent damage to microvascular anastomosis during emergence. However, a recent paradigm shift has advocated for immediate postoperative extubation due to demonstrable increase in complications associated with delayed extubation. 178 , 179 , 180 Use of rapid awakening procedures to bring patients to a lucid state prior to departure from the operating room significantly reduces complications, including pneumonia, and ICU LOS upon multivariate analysis. 180 Bertelsen et al. found no increase in free flap or other complications associated with immediate extubation. 181 In those with extensive alcohol consumption prior to surgery, extubation in the operating room decreases need for treatment for alcohol withdrawal. 179 Early extubation additionally increases patient comfort and significantly decreases use of anxiolytics and restraint use during hospital stay. 178 In cases where airway security cannot be guaranteed, such as extensive oral cavity resections with bulky free flap reconstruction, recent literature advocates for a delayed extubation trial on POD1 rather than the classic teaching of preemptive tracheostomy. 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 Preemptive tracheostomy placement has been shown to be an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in patients with extensive oral cavity resections including increased rates of dysphagia, pneumonias, and LOS when compared to delayed extubation. 182 , 190 Between the preemptive and delayed tracheostomy groups in oral cavity resections, there remained a decrease in pneumonia rates in the delayed group. 191
2.20. Recommendations
| Immediate postoperative extubation decreases complications and ICU stay while increasing patient wellbeing. | Moderate | Conditional |
| Alternatively to preemptive tracheotomy in patients with potentially unsafe airways, a delayed extubation (POD1) should be considered. | Low | Conditional |
| Conversion to tracheostomy should be considered for patients who fail immediate or delayed extubation on a case‐by‐case basis. | Moderate | Strong |
2.21. Postoperative transfusion
Perioperative transfusion in HNC patients has decreased substantially since implementation of restrictive transfusion protocols. Prior to 2000, up to 73% of HNC patients received perioperative transfusions for large resections and there were associated high complication rates and decreased survival. 192 The current incidence of perioperative transfusion is around 6%. 193 Current transfusion protocols advise blood administration in asymptomatic patients with a hemoglobin <7 in otherwise healthy patients and <8 in patients with cardiovascular disease. 194 , 195 Perioperative transfusion has been considered to increase postoperative morbidity and mortality in HNC patients. 196 Studies have shown a more than two fold increase (71 vs. 31%) in recurrence of HNC, thought to be due to the immunomodulation and tumor‐promoting effects of blood transfusion. 193 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 Decreased OS, increased wound infections, flap failures, and hospital readmission rates were all found to be associated with perioperative blood transfusions. 198 , 201 , 202 , 203 A recent study published by Runge et al. concluded that current transfusion practices do not increase oncologic risk or decrease OS over a 5 year period; however, this study included only a limited number of patients. 204
2.22. Recommendations
| Blood product administration should be given when indicated according to current guidelines of hemoglobin <7 in asymptomatic patients, hemoglobin <8 in asymptomatic cardiovascular patients, or when >30% blood volume lost intraoperatively. | High | Strong |
| Hemostasis should be emphasized throughout surgery to prevent unnecessary blood loss requiring transfusion. | Moderate | Strong |
2.23. Postoperative VTE prophylaxis and anticoagulation
Cancer as well as postoperative state are both individual risk factors for VTE. 205 Consideration of mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis for patients undergoing major head and neck surgery is warranted to reduce risk of VTE. Sequential compression devices (SCDs) decrease the risk of VTE development by 50%; however, ensuring compliance with these can prove difficult. 206 , 207 It has been shown that postoperative low molecular weight heparin reduces VTE incidence in HNC patients by up to 50%; however, this is also associated with a nearly threefold increase in bleeding complications. 208 VTE prophylaxis should therefore be individualized based on the patients risk using the validated Caprini score to determine management. 209 , 210 For patients on chronic anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, safely restarting has also been a point of interest. It is generally recommended to restart warfarin 12–24 h after surgery without bridging via low‐molecular‐weight heparin following HNC surgery. New oral anticoagulants including rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran should be resumed 2–3 days postoperatively. Oral antiplatelet drugs can be restarted 24 h after surgery. 211 , 212
2.24. Recommendations
| All hospitalized HNC surgical patients should have SCDs. | High | Strong |
| Caprini score should be used to determine if chemoprophylaxis is warranted. With score greater than 7 chemoprophylaxis should be strongly considered. | High | Strong |
2.25. Postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a prevalent complication after anesthesia and its incidence is associated with distress and anxiety for surgical patients. 213 , 214 The development of PONV is highly associated with surgical length and postoperative pain, two factors commonly experienced by HNC patients. 17 , 215 , 216 , 217 A multimodal approach to the prevention of PONV should be employed in all patients undergoing HNC surgery. Further complications of PONV include delayed mobilization, wound dehiscence, dehydration, and aspiration. 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 While controlling postoperative pain is paramount to prevention of PONV, postoperative opioids have been found to increase PONV in patients. 215 , 223 This risk can be mitigated by opioid sparing postoperative analgesia which has shown to be both safe and effective. Taniguchi et al. found that scheduled postoperative IV acetaminophen reduces incidence of PONV in gynecologic patients. 224 Gastric decompression prior to extubation has been shown to reduce PONV in otolaryngologic surgeries, though this is commonly reserved to procedures that are likely to introduce blood into the stomach. 220 , 225 , 226 Data show that 5‐hydroxytryptamine‐3 receptor agonists combined with corticosteroids are efficacious for prophylaxis of PONV. 227 , 228 , 229 The evidence supports that breakthrough PONV should be treated with rescue drugs chosen from a different therapeutic class than the prophylactic drugs. 230 , 231
2.26. Recommendations
| All patients undergoing HNC surgery should have PONV prophylaxis scheduled. | Low | Weak |
| Rescue PONV drugs should be in a different class than prophylaxis drugs. | High | Strong |
| Gastric decompression should be applied to all patients undergoing surgeries with risk of blood introduction into the stomach. | Moderate | Strong |
| Opioid sparing pain management should be employed in the prophylaxis of PONV. | High | Strong |
2.27. Postoperative nutrition
Postoperative nutrition plans should be made by a registered dietician who has experience with HNC patients. 232 Early enteral feeding within the first 24 h after surgery has been shown to have many benefits in critically ill or high‐risk patients and is advocated for by multiple clinical guidelines. 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 In HNC patients with a BMI <20, increase in calories has shown to decrease mortality, highlighting the importance of early feeding with emphasis of expedited advance to goal. 237 Early feeding reduces septic complications as well as major medical complications. 238 , 239 , 240 Kerwala et al. found that early oral feeding on POD1 after free flap is not associated with increased dehiscence or fistula formation, however is associated with a decrease in LOS by more than 7 days. 241 Stramiello et al. found that early oral feeding (on or before POD5) in properly selected patients did not increase the risk of salivary fistula after free flap, and may expedite swallowing function recovery. 242 The ERAS program described by Coyle et al. advocates for tube feeds within 12 h after surgery. 187
2.28. Recommendations
| Enteral feeding should be commenced within the first 24 h after surgery. | High | Conditional |
| All patients with preoperative under or malnutrition should be monitored for signs of refeeding syndrome. | Moderate | Conditional |
| Postoperative nutrition plans should be made by a dietician who has experience with HNC patients. | High | Strong |
2.29. Postoperative pain management
Postoperative pain management focuses on the continuation of preoperative pain management with MMA (scheduled celecoxib, gabapentin, and acetaminophen or tramadol). 22 , 23 , 25 , 243 MMA has previously been shown to reduce postoperative opioid prescriptions in outpatient thyroid, parathyroid, and parotid surgeries by up to 50%. 244 , 245 Hinther et al. showed that MMA significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption by approximately 25% and decreased time to mobilization by 1 day among HNC surgery and free flap reconstruction patients. 246 Postoperatively, the patient's baseline pain regimen should be restarted immediately to maintain baseline pain repression. Importantly, administration of MMA preoperatively and perioperatively with control of depression leads to decreased perception of pain and the mean morphine equivalent dose administered in the first 72 h postoperatively. 247 , 248 Kiong et al. found adherence to ERAS protocols also decreases mean hospital stay and overall complications. 243
Although opioid use should be minimized, the severe pain associated with surgery may require opioids for breakthrough pain. 17 , 249 When selecting opioids, the use of longer acting opioids, such as tramadol, methadone and low dose morphine should be utilized to reduce habit forming potentials. It should be kept in mind that certain groups are more likely to suffer from opioid abuse. Preoperative opioid usage, age younger than 65 years, patient‐controlled analgesia use, and ICU admission all predict a higher risk of increased opioid requirements.
2.30. Recommendations
| Postoperative pain management should rely on scheduled opioid sparing analgesics including acetaminophen, gabapentin, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, and glucocorticoids. | High | Strong |
| Opioids should be used sparingly on an as needed basis for pain uncontrolled by scheduled medicines. | High | Strong |
| Long‐acting opioids are preferred over short acting opioids for postsurgical pain management. | Moderate | Conditional |
2.31. Postoperative early mobilization and involvement of physical therapy
One of the cornerstones of ERAS is early postoperative ambulation. 17 , 25 Yeung et al. found that patients mobilized after postoperative day 4 were four times more likely to develop pneumonia. 250 Yang et al. found that early mobilization (out of bed by POD3) was associated with reduced time to removal of nasogastric tubes, urethral catheters, and tracheostomies as well as longer sleep duration and improved patient comfort. 251 Twomey et al. showed that early mobilization within 24 h decreased overall complications, major complications, and LOS whereas mobilization after 48 h increased major complications and LOS. 252 Early mobilization has been shown to decrease the incidence of delirium. 253 Currently, the ERAS guidelines for HNC surgery with free flap reconstruction recommend mobilization within the first 24 h after surgery. 22 Physical therapy should be initiated as soon as possible to begin early and intensive mobilization during the hospital stay. 254 Steegmann et al. showed that an individualized autonomous exercise plan in addition to traditional physical therapy decreased fatigue, digestive problems, and LOS in postoperative HNC patients. These data were more pronounced with earlier initiation of mobilization. 254 Beyond the hospital stay, long‐term exercise regime beyond postoperative hospitalization should also be encouraged for HNC patients. 255 A recent pilot study advocated for at‐home exercise program for HNC patients and showed that it had positive effects on physical function and QoL. 256
2.32. Recommendations
| Patients should mobilize within 24 h of undergoing major HNC surgery. | Moderate | Strong |
| All patients should work with physical therapy throughout their hospitalization. | Moderate | Strong |
| Patients should receive individualized autonomous exercise plans to complete while hospitalized, as well as after discharge. | Low | Strong |
2.33. Postoperative delirium
Postoperative delirium is a common and serious complication after extensive HNC surgery. 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 It is associated with an increased cognitive impairment, readmission, functional disability, mental health disorders pneumonia, LOS, and death. 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 In a meta‐analysis by Zhu et al., authors found that postoperative delirium in the HNC population ranged from 11.50 to 36.11%. 266 Risk factors for the development of delirium in HNC patients include old age, male sex, duration of surgery, history of hypertension, increased blood loss or need for transfusions, alcohol misuse, flap reconstruction, and neck dissection. 258 , 265 , 267 Multicomponent interventions have been proposed to reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium. 268 , 269 They are generally divided into non‐pharmacological intervention and pharmacologic intervention. 270 , 271 Non‐pharmacological interventions include early ambulation, providing appropriate lighting, addressing dehydration and nutritional needs, carrying out medication review, and promoting good sleep hygiene. 272 Pharmacological agents that can be used are antipsychotics, cholinesterase inhibitors, melatonin, and alpha‐2‐agonists. 273
2.34. Recommendations
| Delirium risk factors should be screened preoperatively. | Low | Strong |
| Delirium prevention though pharmacologic and non‐pharmacological interventions should be employed for all patients undergoing major HNC surgery. | High | Strong |
2.35. Postoperative discharge planning
HNC patients require multifaceted discharge coordination following surgery. Due to their complex and intensive discharge needs, HNC patients are at increased risk for discharge delay. Lang et al. demonstrated that patients without social support or those with inadequate or no insurance experienced higher rates of delay, leading to increased LOS. 274 Concerted efforts are needed to identify barriers to discharge prior surgery to prevent unnecessary medical costs and nosocomial risks from prolonged LOS. Involvement of social work and case management should be employed in the phase of transitional care to organize medical supplies, arrange placement after discharge or aid in home health set up, suggest financial or emotional support services. Follow up appointments should be made for patients prior to discharge in all indicated specialties including surgery, medical oncology, radiation oncology, SLP, physical therapy, and all other indicated fields.
2.36. Recommendations
| Aside from post hospital placement, discharge planning should include patient and family education, organization of at home medical supplies, financial and emotional support resources, and scheduling of follow up appointments. | Moderate | Conditional |
| Due to their complex and intensive postsurgical needs, discharge planning for major HNC surgery patients should begin on or before the day of surgery. | Moderate | Strong |
| Barriers to discharge should be assessed prior to surgery. | Moderate | Strong |
3. CONCLUSION
Institution of an ERAS protocol for patients undergoing head and neck surgeries requires comprehensive collaboration from multidisciplinary teams. ERAS reduces complications, shortens LOS and therefore can reduce healthcare costs while providing better perioperative care in patients undergoing HNC surgeries. Implementing ERAS principles in head and neck surgery is still a growing process. While increasing data for HNC is being produced in the literature, many of the ERAS recommendations remain generalized from those utilized in other surgical fields. ERAS is a dynamic set of recommendations designed to evolve as new data emerge. Current and future advances in HNC research will serve to strengthen and add new principles to a comprehensive ERAS protocol.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Louisiana State University Health‐Shreveport, College of Medicine.
List MA, Knackstedt M, Liu L, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery, current, and future considerations in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology. 2023;8(5):1240‐1256. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1126
REFERENCES
- 1. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606‐617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg. 1999;86(2):227‐230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Engelman RM, Rousou JA, Flack JE, et al. Fast‐track recovery of the coronary bypass patient. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58(6):1742‐1746. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91674-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bardram L, Funch‐Jensen P, Jensen P, Kehlet H, Crawford ME. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. 1995;345(8952):763‐764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PHP, et al. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Acute Pain. 2006;8(4):189‐190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gustafsson UO. Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kata A, Sudore R, Finlayson E, Broering JM, Ngo S, Tang VL. Increasing advance care planning using a surgical optimization program for older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(10):2017‐2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jørgensen CC, Madsbad S, Kehlet H. Postoperative morbidity and mortality in type‐2 diabetics after fast‐track primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(1):230‐238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Nelson G, Kalogera E, Dowdy SC. Enhanced recovery pathways in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(3):586‐594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Moningi S, Patki A, Padhy N, Ramachandran G. Enhanced recovery after surgery: an anesthesiologist's perspective. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019;35(Suppl 1):S5‐S13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Xu W, Daneshmand S, Bazargani ST, et al. Postoperative pain management after radical cystectomy: comparing traditional versus enhanced recovery protocol pathway. J Urol. 2015;194(5):1209‐1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N. A fast‐track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(3):842‐847.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Stowers MDJ, Manuopangai L, Hill AG, Gray JR, Coleman B, Munro JT. Enhanced recovery after surgery in elective hip and knee arthroplasty reduces length of hospital stay. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86(6):475‐479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Madani A, Fiore JF, Wang Y, et al. An enhanced recovery pathway reduces duration of stay and complications after open pulmonary lobectomy. Surgery. 2015;158(4):899‐910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Porteous GH, Neal JM, Slee A, Schmidt H, Low DE. A standardized anesthetic and surgical clinical pathway for esophageal resection. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(2):139‐149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Song W, Wang K, Zhang R, Dai Q, Zou S. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in liver surgery: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Dort JC, Farwell DG, Findlay M, et al. Optimal perioperative care in major head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(3):292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chaturvedi SK, Shenoy A, Prasad KMR, Senthilnathan SM, Premlatha BS. Concerns, coping and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 1996;4(3):186‐190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Nguyen NP, Frank C, Moltz CC, et al. Impact of dysphagia on quality of life after treatment of head‐and‐neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61(3):772‐778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hammerlid E, Silander E, Hornestam L, Sullivan M. Health‐related quality of life three years after diagnosis of head and neck cancer? A longitudinal study. Head Neck. 2001;23(2):113‐125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Katz MR, Irish JC, Devins GM, Rodin GM, Gullane PJ. Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck cancer: the impact of disfigurement, gender and social support. Head Neck. 2002;25(2):103‐112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Clark BS, Swanson M, Widjaja W, et al. ERAS for head and neck tissue transfer reduces opioid usage, peak pain scores, and blood utilization. Laryngoscope. 2020;131(3):E792‐E799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Vu CN, Lewis CM, Bailard NS, Kapoor R, Rubin ML, Zheng G. Association between multimodal analgesia administration and perioperative opioid requirements in patients undergoing head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(8):708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Low GMI, Kiong KL, Amaku R, et al. Feasibility of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for major head and neck oncologic surgery. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020;41(6):102679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Jandali DB, Vaughan D, Eggerstedt M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery in head and neck surgery: reduced opioid use and length of stay. Laryngoscope. 2019;130(5):1227‐1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine . Oxford centre for evidence‐based medicine—levels of evidence. [Online]. 2009. http://www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/
- 27. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7652):1049‐1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Morley L, McAndrew A, Tse K, Rakaric P, Cummings B, Cashell A. Patient and staff assessment of an audiovisual education tool for head and neck radiation therapy. J Cancer Educ. 2013;28(3):474‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bozec A, Schultz P, Gal J, et al. Evaluation of the information given to patients undergoing total pharyngolaryngectomy and quality of life: a prospective multicentric study. Eur Arch Oto‐Rhino‐Laryngol. 2019;276(9):2531‐2539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kessels RPC. Patients' memory for medical information. J Royal Soc Med. 2003;96(5):219‐222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hekkenberg RJ, Irish JC, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Gullane PJ. Informed consent in head and neck surgery: how much do patients actually remember? J Otolaryngol. 1997;26(3):155‐159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Papadakos J, McQuestion M, Gokhale A, et al. Informational needs of head and neck cancer patients. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(4):847‐856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kubba H. Reading skills of otolaryngology outpatients: implications for information provision. J Laryngol Otol. 2000;114(9):694‐696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Loiselle CG, Edgar L, Batist G, Lu J, Lauzier S. The impact of a multimedia informational intervention on psychosocial adjustment among individuals with newly diagnosed breast or prostate cancer: a feasibility study. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(1):48‐55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. D'Souza V, Blouin E, Zeitouni A, Muller K, Allison PJ. Do multimedia based information services increase knowledge and satisfaction in head and neck cancer patients? Oral Oncol. 2013;49(9):943‐949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Atack L, Luke R, Chien E. Evaluation of patient satisfaction with tailored online patient education information. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008;26(5):258‐264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Turkdogan S, Roy CF, Chartier G, et al. Effect of perioperative patient education via animated videos in patients undergoing head and neck surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;148(2):173‐179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Siu JM, Rotenberg BW, Franklin JH, Sowerby LJ. Multimedia in the informed consent process for endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized control trial. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(6):1273‐1278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Katz MR, Irish JC, Devins GM. Development and pilot testing of a psychoeducational intervention for oral cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2004;13(9):642‐653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. D'Souza V, Blouin E, Zeitouni A, Muller K, Allison PJ. An investigation of the effect of tailored information on symptoms of anxiety and depression in head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(5):431‐437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. D'Souza V, Blouin E, Zeitouni A, Muller K, Allison PJ. Multimedia information intervention and its benefits in partners of the head and neck cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care. 2017;26(4):e12440. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Schmid M, Giger R, Nisa L, Mueller SA, Schubert M, Schubert AD. Association of multiprofessional preoperative assessment and information for patients with head and neck cancer with postoperative outcomes. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;148(3):259‐267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Berkowitz JF, Lucente FE. Counseling before laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 1985;95(11):1332‐1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Carroll WR, Locher JL, Canon CL, Bohannon IA, McColloch NL, Magnuson JS. Pretreatment swallowing exercises improve swallow function after chemoradiation. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(1):39‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Roe JW, Ashforth KM. Prophylactic swallowing exercises for patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;19(3):144‐149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Shenson JA, Craig JN, Rohde SL. Effect of preoperative counseling on hospital length of stay and readmissions after total laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(2):289‐298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Jones S, Alnaib M, Kokkinakis M, Wilkinson M, St Clair Gibson A, Kader D. Pre‐operative patient education reduces length of stay after knee joint arthroplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(1):71‐75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Moulton LS, Evans PA, Starks I, Smith T. Pre‐operative education prior to elective hip arthroplasty surgery improves postoperative outcome. Int Orthop. 2015;39(8):1483‐1486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Longobardi Y, Savoia V, Parrilla C, et al. Pre‐operative speech‐language pathology counselling in patients undergoing total laryngectomy: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Curr Psychol. 2021;42:5717‐5727. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Møller AM, Villebro N, Pedersen T, Tønnesen H. Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9301):114‐117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Krueger JK, Rohrich RJ. Clearing the smoke: the scientific rationale for tobacco abstention with plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(4):1063‐1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Delgado‐Rodriguez M, Medina‐Cuadros M, Martínez‐Gallego G, et al. A prospective study of tobacco smoking as a predictor of complications in general surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24(1):37‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Moores LK. Smoking and postoperative pulmonary complications. An evidence‐based review of the recent literature. Clin Chest Med. 2000;21(1):139‐x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Møller AM, Maaløe R, Pedersen T. Postoperative intensive care admittance: the role of tobacco smoking. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45(3):345‐348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Higham H, Sear JW, Neill F, Sear YM, Foëx P. Peri‐operative silent myocardial ischaemia and long‐term adverse outcomes in non‐cardiac surgical patients. Anaesthesia. 2001;56(7):630‐637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sorensen LT, Karlsmark T, Gottrup F. Abstinence from smoking reduces incisional wound infection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):1‐5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Schwartz SR, Yueh B, Maynard C, Daley J, Henderson W, Khuri SF. Predictors of wound complications after laryngectomy: as study of over 2000 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131(1):61‐68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Cloke DJ, Green JE, Khan AL, Hodgkinson PD, McLean NR. Factors influencing the development of wound infection following free‐flap reconstruction for intra‐oral cancer. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57(6):556‐560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Bianchi B, Copelli C, Ferrari S, Ferri A, Sesenna E. Free flaps: outcomes and complications in head and neck reconstructions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009;37(8):438‐442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Clark JR, McCluskey SA, Hall F, et al. Predictors of morbidity following free flap reconstruction for cancer of the head and neck. Head Neck. 2007;29(12):1090‐1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Stevens MH, Gardner JW, Parkin JL, Johnson LP. Head and neck cancer survival and life‐style change. Arch Otolaryngol. 1983;109(11):746‐749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Day GL, Blot WJ, Shore RE, et al. Second cancers following oral and pharyngeal cancers: role of tobacco and alcohol. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86(2):131‐137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Kim AJ, Suh JD, Sercarz JA, et al. Salvage surgery with free flap reconstruction: factors affecting outcome after treatment of recurrent head and neck squamous carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(6):1019‐1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Des Rochers C, Dische S, Saunders MI. The problem of cigarette smoking in radiotherapy for cancer in the head and neck. Clin Oncol. 1992;4(4):214‐216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Lassig AAD, Bechtold JE, Lindgren BR, et al. Tobacco exposure and wound healing in head and neck surgical wounds. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(3):618‐625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Iqbal U, Green JB, Patel S, et al. Preoperative patient preparation in enhanced recovery pathways. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019;35(Suppl 1):S14‐S23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Sørensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arch Surg. 2012;147(4):373‐383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Sheeran P, Jones K, Avishai A, et al. What works in smoking cessation interventions for cancer survivors? A meta‐analysis. Health Psychol. 2019;38(10):855‐865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Park ER, Perez GK, Regan S, et al. Effect of sustained smoking cessation counseling and provision of medication vs shorter‐term counseling and medication advice on smoking abstinence in patients recently diagnosed with cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324(14):1406‐1418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Klemp I, Steffenssen M, Bakholdt V, Thygesen T, Sørensen JA. Counseling is effective for smoking cessation in head and neck cancer patients‐a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(8):1687‐1694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. McCarter K, Baker AL, Britton B, et al. Smoking, drinking, and depression: comorbidity in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Cancer Med. 2018;7(6):2382‐2390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Duffy SA, Ronis DL, Valenstein M, et al. A tailored smoking, alcohol, and depression intervention for head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(11):2203‐2208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. McCarter K, Martínez Ú, Britton B, et al. Smoking cessation care among patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):e012296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Oppedal K, Møller AM, Pedersen B, Tønnesen H. Preoperative alcohol cessation prior to elective surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. 11;(7):CD008343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Kaka AS, Zhao S, Ozer E, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes following head and neck surgery among patients who contract to abstain from alcohol vs patients who abuse alcohol. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(12):1181‐1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Saroul N, Pastourel R, Mulliez A, et al. Which assessment method of malnutrition in head and neck cancer? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;158(6):1065‐1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Righini CA, Timi N, Junet P, Bertolo A, Reyt E, Atallah I. Assessment of nutritional status at the time of diagnosis in patients treated for head and neck cancer. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2013;130(1):8‐14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Gatta G, Botta L, Sánchez MJ, et al. Prognoses and improvement for head and neck cancers diagnosed in Europe in early 2000s: the EUROCARE‐5 population‐based study. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(15):2130‐2143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Danan D, Shonka DC Jr, Selman Y, Chow Z, Smolkin ME, Jameson MJ. Prognostic value of albumin in patients with head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(7):1567‐1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Leung JS, Seto A, Li GK. Association between preoperative nutritional status and postoperative outcome in head and neck cancer patients. Nutr Cancer. 2017;69(3):464‐469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Lim WS, Roh JL, Kim SB, Choi SH, Nam SY, Kim SY. Pretreatment albumin level predicts survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(12):E437‐E442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Orell‐Kotikangas H, Österlund P, Mäkitie O, et al. Cachexia at diagnosis is associated with poor survival in head and neck cancer patients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137(7):778‐785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Mattioli F, Bettini M, Molteni G, et al. Analysis of risk factors for pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy with particular focus on nutritional status. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015;35(4):243‐248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Parhar HS, Durham JS, Anderson DW, Rush B, Prisman E. The association between the nutrition‐related index and morbidity following head and neck microsurgery. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(2):375‐380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Ahmed S, Travis J, Mehanna H. Re‐feeding syndrome in head and neck—prevention and management. Oral Oncol. 2011;47(9):792‐796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Magnano M, Mola P, Machetta G, et al. The nutritional assessment of head and neck cancer patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(12):3793‐3799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Findlay M, Bauer J, Brown T, Committee HaNGS . Evidence‐Based Practice Guidelines for the Nutritional Management of Adult Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Cancer Council Australia; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 88. Heyland DK, Montalvo M, MacDonald S, Keefe L, Su XY, Drover JW. Total parenteral nutrition in the surgical patient: a meta‐analysis. Can J Surg. 2001;44(2):102‐111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Löser C, Aschl G, Hébuterne X, et al. ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition—percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Clin Nutr. 2005;24(5):848‐861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Adiamah A, Skořepa P, Weimann A, Lobo DN. The impact of preoperative immune modulating nutrition on outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ann Surg. 2019;270(2):247‐256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Wong CS, Aly EH. The effects of enteral immunonutrition in upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Surg. 2016;29:137‐150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Probst P, Ohmann S, Klaiber U, et al. Meta‐analysis of immunonutrition in major abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2017;104(12):1594‐1608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Howes N, Atkinson C, Thomas S, Lewis SJ. Immunonutrition for patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):CD010954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Vidal‐Casariego A, Calleja‐Fernández A, Villar‐Taibo R, Kyriakos G, Ballesteros‐Pomar MD. Efficacy of arginine‐enriched enteral formulas in the reduction of surgical complications in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(6):951‐957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Rowan NR, Johnson JT, Fratangelo CE, Smith BK, Kemerer PA, Ferris RL. Utility of a perioperative nutritional intervention on postoperative outcomes in high‐risk head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2016;54:42‐46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee . Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(3):495‐511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Brady M, Kinn S, Stuart P. Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;4(4):CD004423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Spies CD, Breuer JP, Gust R, et al. Präoperative nahrungskarenz. Ein update [Preoperative fasting. An update]. Anaesthesist. 2003;52(11):1039‐1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Yuill KA, Richardson RA, Davidson HI, Garden OJ, Parks RW. The administration of an oral carbohydrate‐containing fluid prior to major elective upper‐gastrointestinal surgery preserves skeletal muscle mass postoperatively—a randomised clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(1):32‐37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009;144(10):961‐969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Gianotti L, Biffi R, Sandini M, et al. Preoperative oral carbohydrate load versus placebo in major elective abdominal surgery (PROCY): a randomized, placebo‐controlled, multicenter, phase iii trial. Ann Surg. 2018;267(4):623‐630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Rizvanović N, Nesek Adam V, Čaušević S, Dervišević S, Delibegović S. A randomised controlled study of preoperative oral carbohydrate loading versus fasting in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34(9):1551‐1561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Noba L, Wakefield A. Are carbohydrate drinks more effective than preoperative fasting: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(17‐18):3096‐3116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Findlay M, White K, Lai M, Luo D, Bauer JD. The association between computed tomography‐defined sarcopenia and outcomes in adult patients undergoing radiotherapy of curative intent for head and neck cancer: a systematic review. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020;120(8):1330‐1347.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16‐31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Chang SW, Hsu CM, Tsai YH, et al. Prognostic value of third cervical vertebra skeletal muscle index in oral cavity cancer: a retrospective study. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(7):E2257‐E2265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Swartz JE, Pothen AJ, Wegner I, et al. Feasibility of using head and neck CT imaging to assess skeletal muscle mass in head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2016;62:28‐33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Shachar SS, Williams GR, Muss HB, Nishijima TF. Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: a meta‐analysis and systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2016;57:58‐67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Galli A, Colombo M, Carrara G, et al. Low skeletal muscle mass as predictor of postoperative complications and decreased overall survival in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the role of ultrasound of rectus femoris muscle. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(12):3489‐3502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Bril SI, Pezier TF, Tijink BM, Janssen LM, Braunius WW, de Bree R. Preoperative low skeletal muscle mass as a risk factor for pharyngocutaneous fistula and decreased overall survival in patients undergoing total laryngectomy. Head Neck. 2019;41(6):1745‐1755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Ansari E, Chargi N, van Gemert JTM, et al. Low skeletal muscle mass is a strong predictive factor for surgical complications and a prognostic factor in oral cancer patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction with a free fibula flap. Oral Oncol. 2020;101:104530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Yoshimura T, Suzuki H, Takayama H, et al. Impact of preoperative low prognostic nutritional index and high intramuscular adipose tissue content on outcomes of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancers. 2020;12(11):3167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Jung AR, Roh JL, Kim JS, Choi SH, Nam SY, Kim SY. The impact of skeletal muscle depletion on older adult patients with head and neck cancer undergoing primary surgery. J Geriatr Oncol. 2021;12(1):128‐133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Surov A, Wienke A. Low skeletal muscle mass predicts relevant clinical outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. A meta analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021;13:17588359211008844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Alwani MM, Jones AJ, Novinger LJ, et al. Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes of autologous head and neck free tissue reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020;36(5):369‐378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Jones AJ, Campiti VJ, Alwani M, et al. Sarcopenia is associated with blood transfusions in head and neck cancer free flap surgery. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021;6(2):200‐210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Wong A, Zhu D, Kraus D, Tham T. Radiologically defined sarcopenia affects survival in head and neck cancer: a meta‐analysis. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(2):333‐341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Hua X, Liu S, Liao JF, et al. When the loss costs too much: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of sarcopenia in head and neck cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;9:1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Makiguchi T, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura H, et al. Evaluation of overall and disease‐free survival in patients with free flaps for oral cancer resection. Microsurgery. 2020;40(8):859‐867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Lee J, Liu SH, Dai KY, et al. Sarcopenia and systemic inflammation synergistically impact survival in oral cavity cancer. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(5):E1530‐E1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Takenaka Y, Takemoto N, Oya R, Inohara H. Prognostic impact of sarcopenia in patients with head and neck cancer treated with surgery or radiation: a meta‐analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0259288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Douma JAJ, Verdonck‐de Leeuw IM, Leemans CR, et al. Demographic, clinical and lifestyle‐related correlates of accelerometer assessed physical activity and fitness in newly diagnosed patients with head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol. 2020;59(3):342‐350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Orzell S, Verhaaren BFJ, Grewal R, et al. Evaluation of sarcopenia in older patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery. Laryngoscope. 2022;132(2):356‐363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Gillis C, Carli F. Promoting perioperative metabolic and nutritional care. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(6):1455‐1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Barberan‐Garcia A, Ubré M, Roca J, et al. Personalised prehabilitation in high‐risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2018;267(1):50‐56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Hughes MJ, Hackney RJ, Lamb PJ, Wigmore SJ, Christopher Deans DA, Skipworth RJE. Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. World J Surg. 2019;43(7):1661‐1668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Daniels SL, Lee MJ, George J, et al. Prehabilitation in elective abdominal cancer surgery in older patients: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJS Open. 2020;4(6):1022‐1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Lambert JE, Hayes LD, Keegan TJ, Subar DA, Gaffney CJ. The impact of prehabilitation on patient outcomes in hepatobiliary, colorectal, and upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a PRISMA‐accordant meta‐analysis. Ann Surg. 2021;274(1):70‐77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Bauer J, Morley JE, Schols AMWJ, et al. Sarcopenia: a time for action. An SCWD position paper. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10(5):956‐961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Liu CJ, Latham NK. Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2009(3):CD002759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Twomey R, Culos‐Reed SN, Dort JC. Exercise prehabilitation‐supporting recovery from major head and neck cancer surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(8):689‐690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Lydiatt WM, Moran J, Burke WJ. A review of depression in the head and neck cancer patient. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2009;7(6):397‐403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Paula JM, Sonobe HM, Nicolussi AC, Zago MM, Sawada NO. Symptoms of depression in patients with cancer of the head and neck undergoing radiotherapy treatment: a prospective study. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2012;20:362‐368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Frampton M. Psychological distress in patients with head and neck cancer: review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;39(1):67‐70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. de Leeuw JRJ, de Graeff A, Ros WJG, Blijham GH, Hordijk G‐J, Winnubst JAM. Prediction of depression 6 months to 3 years after treatment of head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2001;23:892‐898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Yousaf U, Christensen ML, Engholm G, Storm HH. Suicides among Danish cancer patients 1971‐1999. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(6):995‐1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Yu GP, Mehta V, Branovan D, Huang Q, Schantz SP. Non‐cancer‐related deaths from suicide, cardiovascular disease, and pneumonia in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(1):25‐32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Hem E, Loge JH, Haldorsen T, Ekeberg Ø. Suicide risk in cancer patients from 1960 to 1999. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(20):4209‐4216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Misono S, Weiss NS, Fann JR, Redman M, Yueh B. Incidence of suicide in persons with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(29):4731‐4738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Sharma SP. High suicide rate among cancer patients fuels prevention discussions. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(24):1750‐1752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Hammerlid E, Ahlner‐Elmqvist M, Bjordal K, et al. A prospective multicentre study in Sweden and Norway of mental distress and psychiatric morbidity in head and neck cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1999;80(5‐6):766‐774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: meta‐analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(14):2101‐2107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Lazure KE, Lydiatt WM, Denman D, Burke WJ. Association between depression and survival or disease recurrence in patients with head and neck cancer enrolled in a depression prevention trial. Head Neck. 2009;31(7):888‐892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Lydiatt WM, Bessette D, Schmid KK, Sayles H, Burke WJ. Prevention of depression with escitalopram in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer: randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(7):678‐686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Panwar A, Rieke K, Burke WJ, Sayles H, Lydiatt WM. Prevention of depression in patients being treated for head and neck cancer trial (PROTECT) study group. Identification of baseline characteristics associated with development of depression among patients with head and neck cancer: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(11):1004‐1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Miller TE, Thacker JK, White WD, et al. Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(5):1052‐1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Eggerstedt M, Stenson KM, Ramirez EA, et al. Association of perioperative opioid‐sparing multimodal analgesia with narcotic use and pain control after head and neck free flap reconstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21(5):446‐451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60(3):289‐334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Barker JC, DiBartola K, Wee C, et al. Preoperative multimodal analgesia decreases postanesthesia care unit narcotic use and pain scores in outpatient breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):443e‐450e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Steinberg AC, Schimpf MO, White AB, et al. Preemptive analgesia for postoperative hysterectomy pain control: systematic review and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):303‐313.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Tiippana EM, Hamunen K, Kontinen VK, Kalso E. Do surgical patients benefit from perioperative gabapentin/pregabalin? A systematic review of efficacy and safety. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(6):1545‐1556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Grape S, Tramèr MR. Do we need preemptive analgesia for the treatment of postoperative pain? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2007;21(1):51‐63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Chiu TW, Leung CC, Lau EY, Burd A. Analgesic effects of preoperative gabapentin after tongue reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap. Hong Kong Med J. 2012;18(1):30‐34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Pattani KM, Byrne P, Boahene K, Richmon J. What makes a good flap go bad? A critical analysis of the literature of intraoperative factors related to free flap failure. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(4):717‐723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Massey MF, Gupta DK. The effects of systemic phenylephrine and epinephrine on pedicle artery and microvascular perfusion in a pig model of myoadipocutaneous rotational flaps. Plast Reconst Surg. 2007;120(5):1289‐1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E, Hu QY, Heerdt P. Effects of vasoactive medications on the blood flow of island musculocutaneous flaps in swine. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;39(5):524‐531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Chang CS, Chu MW, Nelson JA, et al. Complications and cost analysis of intraoperative arterial complications in head and neck free flap reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33(5):318‐327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Fang L, Liu J, Yu C, Hanasono MM, Zheng G, Yu P. Intraoperative use of vasopressors does not increase the risk of free flap compromise and failure in cancer patients. Ann Surg. 2018;268(2):379‐384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Myburgh JA, Mythen MG. Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(13):1243‐1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Kendrick JB, Kaye AD, Tong Y, et al. Goal‐directed fluid therapy in the perioperative setting. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019;35(Suppl 1):S29‐S34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Chong MA, Wang Y, Berbenetz NM, McConachie I. Does goal‐directed haemodynamic and fluid therapy improve peri‐operative outcomes?: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35(7):469‐483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Haughey BH, Wilson E, Kluwe L, et al. Free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: analysis of 241 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;125(1):10‐17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Farwell DG, Reilly DF, Weymuller EA Jr, Greenberg DL, Staiger TO, Futran NA. Predictors of perioperative complications in head and neck patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(5):505‐511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Ettinger KS, Arce K, Lohse CM, et al. Higher perioperative fluid administration is associated with increased rates of complications following head and neck microvascular reconstruction with fibular free flaps. Microsurgery. 2017;37(2):128‐136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Dooley BJ, Karassawa Zanoni D, Mcgill MR, et al. Intraoperative and postanesthesia care unit fluid administration as risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing free tissue transfer. Head Neck. 2020;42(1):14‐24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Bindu B, Bindra A, Rath G. Temperature management under general anesthesia: compulsion or option. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017;33(3):306‐316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Moola S, Lockwood C. Effectiveness of strategies for the management and/or prevention of hypothermia within the adult perioperative environment. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011;9(4):337‐345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Winkler M, Akça O, Birkenberg B, et al. Aggressive warming reduces blood loss during hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(4):978‐984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Schmied H, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Kozek S, Reiter A. Mild hypothermia increases blood loss and transfusion requirements during total hip arthroplasty. Lancet. 1996;347(8997):289‐292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Rajagopalan S, Mascha E, Na J, Sessler DI. The effects of mild perioperative hypothermia on blood loss and transfusion requirement. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(1):71‐77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Leijtens B, Koëter M, Kremers K, Koëter S. High incidence of postoperative hypothermia in total knee and total hip arthroplasty: a prospective observational study. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(6):895‐898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical‐wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of wound infection and temperature group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(19):1209‐1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Aasen AO, Barie PS, Faist E, Ford HR, Fry DE, Hau T. Panel discussion: current issues in the prevention and management of surgical site infection—part 2. Surg Infect. 2002;3(Suppl 1):S99‐S102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Lee LI, Lin CC, Chen MC, Lin CH, Shyr MH. Anesthesia duration and hypothermia affect graft survival in vascularized free flap surgery. Tzu Chi Med J. 2005;17:17‐20. [Google Scholar]
- 175. Agrawal N, Sewell DA, Griswold ME, Frank SM, Hessel TW, Eisele DW. Hypothermia during head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(8):1278‐1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Sumer BD, Myers LL, Leach J, Truelson JM. Correlation between intraoperative hypothermia and perioperative morbidity in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(7):682‐686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Moellhoff N, Broer PN, Heidekrueger PI, Ninkovic M, Ehrl D. Impact of intraoperative hypothermia on microsurgical free flap reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021;37(2):174‐180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Allak A, Nguyen TN, Shonka DC Jr, Reibel JF, Levine PA, Jameson MJ. Immediate postoperative extubation in patients undergoing free tissue transfer. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(4):763‐768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Tamplen ML, Ricceri S, Hemmat S, Seth R, Ryan WR, Knott PD. Benefits of immediate extubation following free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016;32(7):533‐539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Clemens MW, Hanson SE, Rao S, Truong A, Liu J, Yu P. Rapid awakening protocol in complex head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 2015;37(4):464‐470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Bertelsen C, Hur K, Nurimba M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery‐based perioperative protocol for head and neck free flap reconstruction. OTO Open. 2020;4(2):2473974X20931037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Patel PN, Valmadrid AC, Hong DY, Francis DO, Sim MW, Rohde SL. Immediate use of uncuffed tracheostomy after free flap reconstruction of the head and neck. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159(2):242‐248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Gigliotti J, Cheung G, Suhaym O, Agnihotram RV, El‐Hakim M, Makhoul N. Nasotracheal intubation: the preferred airway in oral cavity microvascular reconstructive surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(10):2231‐2240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Moubayed SP, Barker DA, Razfar A, Nabili V, Blackwell KE. Microvascular reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects without tracheostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(2):250‐254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Coyle MJ, Tyrrell R, Godden A, et al. Replacing tracheostomy with overnight intubation to manage the airway in head and neck oncology patients: towards an improved recovery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(6):493‐496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Nagarkar R, Kokane G, Wagh A, et al. Airway management techniques in head and neck cancer surgeries: a retrospective analysis. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;23(3):311‐315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Coyle MJ, Shrimpton A, Perkins C, Fasanmade A, Godden D. First do no harm: should routine tracheostomy after oral and maxillofacial oncological operations be abandoned? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(8):732‐735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Mishra S, Bhatnagar S, Jha RR, Singhal AK. Airway management of patients undergoing oral cancer surgery: a retrospective study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22(7):510‐514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Lapis PN, DeLacure MD, Givi B. Factors in successful elimination of elective tracheotomy in mandibular reconstruction with microvascular tissue. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(1):46‐51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Singh T, Sankla P, Smith G. Tracheostomy or delayed extubation after maxillofacial free‐flap reconstruction? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54(8):878‐882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Madgar O, Livneh N, Dobriyan A, Dagan E, Alon EE. Airway management following head and neck microvascular reconstruction: is tracheostomy mandatory? Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;88(Suppl 4):S44‐S49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Barra S, Barzan L, Maione A, et al. Blood transfusion and other prognostic variables in the survival of patients with cancer of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 1994;104(1 Pt 1):95‐98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Moir MS, Samy RN, Hanasono MM, Terris DJ. Autologous and heterologous blood transfusion in head and neck cancer surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(8):864‐868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Liumbruno G, Bennardello F, Lattanzio A, Piccoli P, Rossetti G. Recommendations for the transfusion of red blood cells. Blood Transfus. 2009;7(1):49‐64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Carson JL, Guyatt G, Heddle NM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines from the AABB: red blood cell transfusion thresholds and storage. JAMA. 2016;316(19):2025‐2035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Danan D, Smolkin ME, Varhegyi NE, Bakos SR, Jameson MJ, Shonka DC Jr. Impact of blood transfusions on patients with head and neck cancer undergoing free tissue transfer. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(1):86‐91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Chau JK, Harris JR, Seikaly HR. Transfusion as a predictor of recurrence and survival in head and neck cancer surgery patients. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;39(5):516‐522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Baumeister P, Canis M, Reiter M. Preoperative anemia and perioperative blood transfusion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Jackson RM, Rice DH. Blood transfusions and recurrence in head and neck cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989;98(3):171‐173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Brandenburg LS, Metzger MC, Poxleitner P, et al. Effects of red blood cell transfusions on distant metastases of oral squamous cell carcinomas. Cancers. 2021;14(1):138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Puram SV, Yarlagadda BB, Sethi R, et al. Transfusion in head and neck free flap patients: practice patterns and a comparative analysis by flap type. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(3):449‐457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Taniguchi Y, Okura M. Prognostic significance of perioperative blood transfusion in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2003;25(11):931‐936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203. Johnson JT, Taylor FH, Thearle PB. Blood transfusion and outcome in stage III head and neck carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(3):307‐310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Runge A, Vales A, Pommer G, et al. Perioperative blood transfusion in head and neck cancer revisited. Laryngoscope. 2022;133(7):1638‐1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Cramer JD, Dilger AE, Schneider A, Smith SS, Samant S, Patel UA. Risk of venous thromboembolism among otolaryngology patients vs general surgery and plastic surgery patients. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(1):9‐17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Roderick P, Ferris G, Wilson K, et al. Towards evidence‐based guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic reviews of mechanical methods, oral anticoagulation, dextran and regional anaesthesia as thromboprophylaxis. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(49):iii‐78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. Cornwell EE 3rd, Chang D, Velmahos G, et al. Compliance with sequential compression device prophylaxis in at‐risk trauma patients: a prospective analysis. Am Surg. 2002;68(5):470‐473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Bahl V, Shuman AG, Hu HM, et al. Chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in otolaryngology. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(11):999‐1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. Caprini JA, Arcelus JI, Hasty JH, Tamhane AC, Fabrega F. Clinical assessment of venous thromboembolic risk in surgical patients. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1991;17(Suppl 3):304‐312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Pannucci CJ, Swistun L, MacDonald JK, Henke PK, Brooke BS. Individualized venous thromboembolism risk stratification using the 2005 Caprini score to identify the benefits and harms of chemoprophylaxis in surgical patients: a meta‐analysis. Ann Surg. 2017;265(6):1094‐1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. Jethwa AR, Khariwala SS. When should therapeutic anticoagulation be restarted following major head and neck surgery? Laryngoscope. 2018;128(5):1025‐1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212. Worrall DM, Tanella A, DeMaria S Jr, Miles BA. Anesthesia and enhanced recovery after head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019;52(6):1095‐1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. Fero KE, Jalota L, Hornuss C, Apfel CC. Pharmacologic management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011;12(15):2283‐2296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Pierre S, Whelan R. Nausea and vomiting after surgery. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. 2013;13:28‐32. [Google Scholar]
- 215. Apfel CC, Heidrich FM, Jukar‐Rao S, et al. Evidence‐based analysis of risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(5):742‐753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Schwartz J, Gan TJ. Management of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the context of an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020;34(4):687‐700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Andersen R, Krohg K. Pain as a major cause of postoperative nausea. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1976;23(4):366‐369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Eryilmaz T, Sencan A, Camgoz N, Ak B, Yavuzer R. A challenging problem that concerns the aesthetic surgeon: postoperative nausea and vomiting. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61(5):489‐491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Myklejord DJ, Yao L, Liang H, Glurich I. Consensus guideline adoption for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting. WMJ. 2012;111(5):207‐214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220. Jones JE, Tabaee A, Glasgold R, Gomillion MC. Efficacy of gastric aspiration in reducing posttonsillectomy vomiting. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(8):980‐984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Gan TJ. Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(6):1884‐1898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222. Chandrakantan A, Glass PS. Multimodal therapies for postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pain. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(Suppl 1):i27‐i40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223. Roberts GW, Bekker TB, Carlsen HH, Moffatt CH, Slattery PJ, McClure AF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting are strongly influenced by postoperative opioid use in a dose‐related manner. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(5):1343‐1348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224. Taniguchi H, Nagahuchi M, Kamada T, et al. Effect of scheduled intravenous acetaminophen on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. J Anesth. 2020;34(4):502‐511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225. Erkalp K, Kalekoglu Erkalp N, Sevdi MS, et al. Gastric decompression decreases postoperative nausea and vomiting in ENT surgery. Int J Otolaryngol. 2014;2014:275860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226. Pasternak LR. Anesthetic considerations in otolaryngological and ophthalmological outpatient surgery. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1990;28(2):89‐100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227. Henzi I, Walder B, Tramèr MR. Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2000;90(1):186‐194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228. De Oliveira GS Jr, Castro‐Alves LJ, Ahmad S, Kendall MC, McCarthy RJ. Dexamethasone to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting: an updated meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(1):58‐74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Kaushal J, Gupta MC, Kaushal V, et al. Clinical evaluation of two antiemetic combinations palonosetron dexamethasone versus ondansetron dexamethasone in chemotherapy of head and neck cancer. Singapore Med J. 2010;51(11):871‐875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230. Gan TJ, Meyer T, Apfel CC, et al. Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(2):411‐448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231. Shaikh SI, Nagarekha D, Hegade G, Marutheesh M. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: a simple yet complex problem. Anesth Essays Res. 2016;10(3):388‐396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232. Nesemeier R, Dunlap N, McClave SA, Tennant P. Evidence‐based support for nutrition therapy in head and neck cancer. Curr Surg Rep. 2017;5(8):18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233. McClave SA, DiBaise JK, Mullin GE, Martindale RG. ACG clinical guideline: nutrition therapy in the adult hospitalized patient. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(3):315‐335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234. Tignanelli CJ, Andrews AG, Sieloff KM, et al. Are predictive energy expenditure equations in ventilated surgery patients accurate? J Intensive Care Med. 2019;34(5):426‐431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235. Ardilio S. Calculating nutrition needs for a patient with head and neck cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15(5):457‐459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236. Talwar B, Donnelly R, Skelly R, Donaldson M. Nutritional management in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130(S2):S32‐S40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237. Roussel LM, Micault E, Peyronnet D, et al. Intensive nutritional care for patients treated with radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a randomized study and meta‐analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(2):977‐987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238. Moore FA, Feliciano DV, Andrassy RJ, et al. Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications. The results of a meta‐analysis. Ann Surg. 1992;216(2):172‐183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239. Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, et al. Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Ann Surg. 1992;215(5):503‐513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240. Kompan L, Kremzar B, Gadzijev E, Prosek M. Effects of early enteral nutrition on intestinal permeability and the development of multiple organ failure after multiple injury. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25(2):157‐161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241. Kerawala CJ, Riva F, Paleri V. The impact of early oral feeding following head and neck free flap reconstruction on complications and length of stay. Oral Oncol. 2021;113:105094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242. Stramiello J, Nuyen B, Saraswathula A, et al. Timing of postoperative oral feeding after head and neck mucosal free flap reconstruction. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021;6(5):1031‐1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243. Kiong KL, Vu CN, Yao CMKL, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in head and neck oncologic surgery: a case‐matched analysis of perioperative and pain outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(2):867‐876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244. Militsakh O, Lydiatt W, Lydiatt D, et al. Development of multimodal analgesia pathways in outpatient thyroid and parathyroid surgery and association with postoperative opioid prescription patterns. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(11):1023‐1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245. Oltman J, Militsakh O, D'Agostino M, et al. Multimodal analgesia in outpatient head and neck surgery: a feasibility and safety study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(12):1207‐1212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246. Hinther A, Nakoneshny SC, Chandarana SP, et al. Efficacy of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain management in head and neck cancer patients. Cancers. 2021;13(6):1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247. Sheng J, Liu S, Wang Y, Cui R, Zhang X. The link between depression and chronic pain: neural mechanisms in the brain. Neural Plast. 2017;2017:9724371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248. Kleiber B, Jain S, Trivedi MH. Depression and pain: implications for symptomatic presentation and pharmacological treatments. Psychiatry. 2005;2(5):12‐18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249. Jellish WS, Leonetti JP, Sawicki K, Anderson D, Origitano TC. Morphine/ondansetron PCA for postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting after skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135(2):175‐181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250. Yeung JK, Harrop R, McCreary O, et al. Delayed mobilization after microsurgical reconstruction: an independent risk factor for pneumonia. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(12):2996‐3000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251. Yang Y, Wu HY, Wei L, Li PJ, Cai ZG, Shan XF. Improvement of the patient early mobilization protocol after oral and maxillofacial free flap reconstruction surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020;48(1):43‐48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252. Twomey R, Matthews TW, Nakoneshny S, et al. Impact of early mobilization on recovery after major head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. Cancers. 2021;13(12):2852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253. Kim JH, Lee YS, Kim YH, et al. Early ambulation to prevent delirium after long‐time head and neck cancer surgery. Front Surg. 2022;9:880092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254. Steegmann J, Bartella AK, Kloss‐Brandstätter A, Kamal M, Hölzle F, Lethaus B. A randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of a patient‐adapted autonomous exercise regime for patients with head and neck cancer. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020;48(3):187‐192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255. Mina DS, Sabiston CM, Au D, et al. Connecting people with cancer to physical activity and exercise programs: a pathway to create accessibility and engagement. Curr Oncol. 2018;25(2):149‐162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256. Felser S, Behrens M, Liese J, et al. Feasibility and effects of a supervised exercise program suitable for independent training at home on physical function and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: a pilot study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2020;19:1534735420918935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257. Booka E, Kamijo T, Matsumoto T, et al. Incidence and risk factors for postoperative delirium after major head and neck cancer surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(7):890‐894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258. Shah S, Weed HG, He X, Agrawal A, Ozer E, Schuller DE. Alcohol‐related predictors of delirium after major head and neck cancer surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(3):266‐271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259. Shiiba M, Takei M, Nakatsuru M, et al. Clinical observations of postoperative delirium after surgery for oral carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(6):661‐665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260. Wang SG, Lee UJ, Goh EK, Chon KM. Factors associated with postoperative delirium after major head and neck surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;113(1):48‐51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261. Makiguchi T, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura H, et al. Impact of skeletal muscle mass on postoperative delirium in patients undergoing free flap repair after oral cancer resection. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020;54(3):161‐166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262. Koster S, Hensens AG, van der Palen J. The long‐term cognitive and functional outcomes of postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(5):1469‐1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263. Abelha FJ, Luís C, Veiga D, et al. Outcome and quality of life in patients with postoperative delirium during an ICU stay following major surgery. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264. Robinson TN, Raeburn CD, Tran ZV, Angles EM, Brenner LA, Moss M. Postoperative delirium in the elderly: risk factors and outcomes. Ann Surg. 2009;249(1):173‐178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265. Hasegawa T, Saito I, Takeda D, et al. Risk factors associated with postoperative delirium after surgery for oral cancer. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(7):1094‐1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266. Densky J, Eskander A, Kang S, et al. Risk factors associated with postoperative delirium in patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(3):216‐221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267. Choi NY, Kim EH, Baek CH, Sohn I, Yeon S, Chung MK. Development of a nomogram for predicting the probability of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(4):683‐688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268. Tsuruta R, Fujita M. Comparison of clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in critically ill adult patients. Acute Med Surg. 2018;5(3):207‐212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269. Morandi A, Piva S, Ely EW, et al. Worldwide survey of the “assessing pain, both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials, choice of drugs, delirium monitoring/management, early exercise/mobility, and family empowerment” (ABCDEF) bundle. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(11):e1111‐e1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270. Pandharipande PP, Patel MB, Barr J. Management of pain, agitation, and delirium in critically ill patients. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2014;124(3):114‐123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271. Korc‐Grodzicki B, Root JC, Alici Y. Prevention of post‐operative delirium in older patients with cancer undergoing surgery. J Geriatr Oncol. 2015;6(1):60‐69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272. Wade DF, Moon Z, Windgassen SS, Harrison AM, Morris L, Weinman JA. Non‐pharmacological interventions to reduce ICU‐related psychological distress: a systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82(4):465‐478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825‐e873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274. Lang DM, Danan D, Sawhney R, et al. Discharge delay in head and neck free flap surgery: risk factors and strategies to minimize hospital days. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160(5):829‐838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
