Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1996 Feb;50(1):51–55. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.1.51

Cancer risk and prognosis in Norway: comparing women in their first marriage with women who have never married.

A Kvikstad 1, L J Vatten 1
PMCID: PMC1060204  PMID: 8762354

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The difference in risk of cancer between never married women and married women in their first marriage and whether survival from cancer was any different between the two groups were studied. DESIGN: This was a population based, nested case-control study of cancer in Norwegian women diagnosed between 1966 and 1990, and followed up with regard to overall survival until the end of 1991. SETTING: Norway. PARTICIPANTS: These were Norwegian women born between 1935 and 1954. The case-control study included 12,237 married and 1466 unmarried cases, and 26,075 married and 2768 unmarried controls. In the survival analysis, 11,943 married and 1473 unmarried cases were included. MAIN RESULTS: Unmarried women had an overall increased cancer risk (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.05, 1.21), which could be attributed to cancer of the ovaries, uterus, brain and haematological malignancies. For cervical and thyroid cancer, the risk was lower than for married women. In the survival analysis, unmarried cases had an overall 26% increased risk of dying (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.15, 1.39), after adjustment for age and stage at diagnosis. The increased death rate was seen for cancer of the cervix, lung, and thyroid. CONCLUSIONS: Since most unmarried women were nulliparous, this might explain their increased risk of ovarian and uterine cancer. The increased risk of brain tumours and haematological malignancies may result from selection bias, since disease among unmarried women may cause a large proportion to remain unmarried. The lower survival in unmarried cases may support the hypothesis that psychosocial factors play a role in the prognosis of cancer patients.

Full text

PDF
51

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akslen L. A., Nilssen S., Kvåle G. Reproductive factors and risk of thyroid cancer. A prospective study of 63,090 women from Norway. Br J Cancer. 1992 May;65(5):772–774. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BERKSON J. Mortality and marital status. Reflections on the derivation of etiology from statistics. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1962 Aug;52:1318–1329. doi: 10.2105/ajph.52.8.1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ben-Shlomo Y., Smith G. D., Shipley M., Marmot M. G. Magnitude and causes of mortality differences between married and unmarried men. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Jun;47(3):200–205. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.3.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beral V., Fraser P., Chilvers C. Does pregnancy protect against ovarian cancer? Lancet. 1978 May 20;1(8073):1083–1087. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90925-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boffetta P., Merletti F., Winkelmann R., Magnani C., Cappa A. P., Terracini B. Survival of breast cancer patients from Piedmont, Italy. Cancer Causes Control. 1993 May;4(3):209–215. doi: 10.1007/BF00051315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brinton L. A., Fraumeni J. F., Jr Epidemiology of uterine cervical cancer. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(12):1051–1065. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90139-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Broadhead W. E., Kaplan B. H., James S. A., Wagner E. H., Schoenbach V. J., Grimson R., Heyden S., Tibblin G., Gehlbach S. H. The epidemiologic evidence for a relationship between social support and health. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 May;117(5):521–537. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cassileth B. R., Lusk E. J., Miller D. S., Brown L. L., Miller C. Psychosocial correlates of survival in advanced malignant disease? N Engl J Med. 1985 Jun 13;312(24):1551–1555. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198506133122406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ernster V. L., Sacks S. T., Selvin S., Petrakis N. L. Cancer incidence by marital status: U.S. Third National Cancer Survey. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979 Sep;63(3):567–585. doi: 10.1093/jnci/63.3.567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ewertz M. Breast cancer in Denmark. Incidence, risk factors, and characteristics of survival. Acta Oncol. 1993;32(6):595–615. doi: 10.3109/02841869309092438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Franceschi S. Reproductive factors and cancers of the breast, ovary and endometrium. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989 Dec;25(12):1933–1943. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(89)90375-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldman N. Marriage selection and mortality patterns: inferences and fallacies. Demography. 1993 May;30(2):189–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodwin J. S., Hunt W. C., Key C. R., Samet J. M. The effect of marital status on stage, treatment, and survival of cancer patients. JAMA. 1987 Dec 4;258(21):3125–3130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gove W. R. Sex, marital status, and mortality. AJS. 1973 Jul;79(1):45–67. doi: 10.1086/225505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Janerich D. T., Hoff M. B. Evidence for a crossover in breast cancer risk factors. Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Nov;116(5):737–742. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kogevinas M., Marmot M. G., Fox A. J., Goldblatt P. O. Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Sep;45(3):216–219. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.3.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kravdal O., Glattre E., Kvåle G., Tretli S. A sub-site-specific analysis of the relationship between colorectal cancer and parity in complete male and female Norwegian birth cohorts. Int J Cancer. 1993 Jan 2;53(1):56–61. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910530112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kvikstad A., Vatten L. J., Tretli S., Kvinnsland S. Death of a husband or marital divorce related to risk of breast cancer in middle-aged women. A nested case-control study among Norwegian women born 1935-1954. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(4):473–477. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)90422-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kvåle G., Heuch I. Is the incidence of colorectal cancer related to reproduction? A prospective study of 63,000 women. Int J Cancer. 1991 Feb 1;47(3):390–395. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910470314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kvåle G., Heuch I., Nilssen S., Beral V. Reproductive factors and risk of ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Int J Cancer. 1988 Aug 15;42(2):246–251. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910420217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kvåle G., Heuch I., Nilssen S. Reproductive factors and cancers of the breast and genital organs--are the different cancer sites similarly affected? Cancer Detect Prev. 1991;15(5):369–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. LOGAN W. P. Marriage and childbearing in relation to cancer of the breast and uterus. Lancet. 1953 Dec 5;265(6797):1199–1202. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(53)90748-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lund E. Mortality from ovarian cancer among women with many children. Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;21(5):872–876. doi: 10.1093/ije/21.5.872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller A. B., Barclay T. H., Choi N. W., Grace M. G., Wall C., Plante M., Howe G. R., Cinader B., Davis F. G. A study of cancer, parity and age at first pregnancy. J Chronic Dis. 1980;33(10):595–605. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(80)90002-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Murphy M., Goldblatt P., Thornton-Jones H., Silcocks P. Survival among women with cancer of the uterine cervix: influence of marital status and social class. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Dec;44(4):293–296. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.4.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Potter J. D., McMichael A. J. Large bowel cancer in women in relation to reproductive and hormonal factors: a case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983 Oct;71(4):703–709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Potter J. D., Slattery M. L., Bostick R. M., Gapstur S. M. Colon cancer: a review of the epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(2):499–545. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Reynolds P., Kaplan G. A. Social connections and risk for cancer: prospective evidence from the Alameda County Study. Behav Med. 1990 Fall;16(3):101–110. doi: 10.1080/08964289.1990.9934597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sheps M. C. Marriage and Mortality. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1961 Apr;51(4):547–555. doi: 10.2105/ajph.51.4.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Swanson G. M., Belle S. H., Satariano W. A. Marital status and cancer incidence: differences in the black and white populations. Cancer Res. 1985 Nov;45(11 Pt 2):5883–5889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES