Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1996 Feb;50(1):72–76. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.1.72

Breast screening: a randomised controlled trial in UK general practice of three interventions designed to increase uptake.

D J Sharp 1, T J Peters 1, J Bartholomew 1, A Shaw 1
PMCID: PMC1060208  PMID: 8762358

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative effectiveness of three interventions designed to increase the uptake of breast screening. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial of a nurse visit with health education (group A), nurse visit without health education (group B), and GP letter (group C). SETTING: The area of south east London served by the Butterfly Walk Breast Screening Unit in Camberwell. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged between 50 and 64 years who were registered with 27 GPs in the Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham family health services authority and who had not attended for first round screening. MAIN RESULTS: Altogether 799 women were randomly allocated to the three groups. In general, delivering the nurse based interventions proved difficult. In group A, 11.4% (95% CI 7.9, 14.9%) of women subsequently attended for screening compared with 7.8% (95% CI 5.1, 11.4%) in group B and 13.1% (95% CI 7.9, 18.4%) in group C. The differences between the groups (95% CIs) were not statistically significant: A versus C, -1.7% (-8.0, +4.6%); B versus C, -5.3% (-11.3, +0.7%); A versus B, +3.6% (-1.0, +8.2%). CONCLUSIONS: A personal letter from the GP seems to be at least as effective at increasing the uptake of breast screening in non-attenders as a nurse making a home visit to discuss the issue of breast screening, and is not noticeably less effective than a visit at which a health education intervention is delivered. It is possible that the GP letter is considerably more effective than either of the two interview-based interventions. With regard to implementing strategies which will increase breast screening uptake and are cost effective, further trials of similar minimal interventions in primary care are required.

Full text

PDF
72

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson P. Effectiveness of general practice interventions for patients with harmful alcohol consumption. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Sep;43(374):386–389. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashby J., Buxton M., Gravelle H. Will a breast screening programme change the workload and referral practice of general practitioners? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Mar;44(1):36–38. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.1.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Austoker J., Sharp D. Breast screening: a subject for debate. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Apr;41(345):166–167. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baron J. A., Gleason R., Crowe B., Mann J. I. Preliminary trial of the effect of general practice based nutritional advice. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Apr;40(333):137–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bickler G., Sutton S. Inaccuracy of FHSA registers: help from electoral registers. BMJ. 1993 May 1;306(6886):1167–1167. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6886.1167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowling A., Jacobson B. Screening: the inadequacy of population registers. BMJ. 1989 Mar 4;298(6673):545–546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6673.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chamberlain J., Moss S. M., Kirkpatrick A. E., Michell M., Johns L. National Health Service breast screening programme results for 1991-2. BMJ. 1993 Aug 7;307(6900):353–356. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6900.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cockburn J., Irwig L., Turnbull D., Simpson J. M., Mock P., Tattersall M. Encouraging attendance at screening mammography: knowledge, attitudes and intentions of general practitioners. Med J Aust. 1989 Oct 2;151(7):391–396. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb101221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cormack M. A., Sweeney K. G., Hughes-Jones H., Foot G. A. Evaluation of an easy, cost-effective strategy for cutting benzodiazepine use in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jan;44(378):5–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fallowfield L. J., Rodway A., Baum M. What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre? J R Soc Med. 1990 Sep;83(9):547–551. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fox S. A., Murata P. J., Stein J. A. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Arch Intern Med. 1991 Jan;151(1):50–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Frazier T. G., Cummings P. D. Motivational factors for participation in breast cancer screening. J Cancer Educ. 1990;5(1):51–54. doi: 10.1080/08858199009528035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. French K., Porter A. M., Robinson S. E., McCallum F. M., Howie J. G., Roberts M. M. Attendance at a breast screening clinic: a problem of administration or attitudes. 1982 Aug 28-Sep 4Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 285(6342):617–620. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6342.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kee F. Do general practitioners facilitate the breast screening programme? Eur J Cancer Prev. 1992 Apr;1(3):231–238. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199204000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marteau T. M. Psychological costs of screening. BMJ. 1989 Aug 26;299(6698):527–527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6698.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McEwen J., King E., Bickler G. Attendance and non-attendance for breast screening at the south east London breast screening service. BMJ. 1989 Jul 8;299(6691):104–106. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6691.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pierce M., Lundy S., Palanisamy A., Winning S., King J. Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening. BMJ. 1989 Jul 15;299(6692):160–162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6692.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rimer B. K., Keintz M. K., Kessler H. B., Engstrom P. F., Rosan J. R. Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers. Radiology. 1989 Jul;172(1):243–246. doi: 10.1148/radiology.172.1.2740510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rudiman R., Gilbert F. J., Ritchie L. D. Comparison of uptake of breast screening, cervical screening, and childhood immunisation. BMJ. 1995 Jan 28;310(6974):229–229. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6974.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sanders D., Fowler G., Mant D., Fuller A., Jones L., Marzillier J. Randomized controlled trial of anti-smoking advice by nurses in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Jul;39(324):273–276. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schofield P. E., Cockburn J., Hill D. J., Reading D. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies. J Med Screen. 1994 Jul;1(3):144–149. doi: 10.1177/096914139400100303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Skrabanek P. The debate over mass mammography in Britain. The case against. BMJ. 1988 Oct 15;297(6654):971–972. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6654.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Smail J., Smail S. Making the service suit the patient. Nurs Times. 1989 Feb 22;85(8):49–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stillman M. J. Women's health beliefs about breast cancer and breast self-examination. Nurs Res. 1977 Mar-Apr;26(2):121–127. doi: 10.1097/00006199-197703000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Torgerson D. J., Donaldson C. An economic view of high compliance as a screening objective. BMJ. 1994 Jan 8;308(6921):117–119. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6921.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Turner K. M., Wilson B. J., Gilbert F. J. Improving breast screening uptake: persuading initial non-attenders to attend. J Med Screen. 1994 Jul;1(3):199–202. doi: 10.1177/096914139400100313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES