Risk-appropriate care, or care in a facility with the capabilities and staffing to adequately meet the needs of patients, is not a new concept in medicine.1-3 For decades, clinical organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (ACOG/SMFM), have partnered to publish risk-appropriate care guidelines, particularly for neonates.4 In 2012, AAP published a revised neonatal levels of care designation policy statement to provide uniform definitions and standards of service for provision of neonatal care,5 with reaffirmation in 2015.6
Neonatal risk-appropriate care decreases mortality risk for very low birth weight infants born in facilities with equipment available and staff trained to care for these high-risk patients.7-9 However, clinical guidelines have not readily translated to systems change with state-level neonatal risk-appropriate care policies on levels of care in less than half of the United States.10,11 Among states with policies, variability in how levels are defined, including equipment, capabilities, subspecialty staffing, telemedicine, and transport, affects standardized provision of care.10,12,13
Renewed attention on maternal care and the role of sub-specialists, including maternal–fetal medicine, on care of pregnant and postpartum women with severe morbidities or obstetrical complications require a focus on levels of maternal care, ensuring women deliver at facilities that best match their health care needs.14 A recent analysis of recommendations made by 13 maternal mortality review committees identified establishing maternal levels of care for all hospitals and developing policies to ensure transport to hospitals with appropriate level of maternal care as common themes for preventing pregnancy-related deaths.15 In 2015, ACOG/SMFM published guidelines that established levels of maternal care equivalent to, but distinct from, the existing guidance of the Guidelines for Perinatal Care 7th edition,16 with a revision issued in 2019 to clarify terminology.17 In 2016, ACOG/SMFM developed a maternal care verification program piloted in three states to provide on-site comprehensive review of services to inform individual facility compliance with the guidelines.18 However, to date, we are not aware of any standardized assessment of how states integrated the clinical guidance into state guidelines or policy.
In levels of maternal care in the United States: an assessment of publicly available state guidelines, Vladutiu and colleagues provide an assessment of state-level guidelines on levels of maternal care.19 The authors provide an in-depth review of publicly available policies that describes how states define levels of maternal care; determine criteria for providers, facility capabilities, and services; and require necessary services including transport and outreach. Vladutiu and colleagues conclude the assessment by highlighting the variability in state-level policies, the need for evaluating the impact of levels of maternal care on maternal outcomes in states, and a call for the use of standardized language in state-level policies. The review of state levels of maternal care policies provides a snapshot of how state agencies, including state departments of health, integrate clinical guidelines into standards of care, ensuring equitable and appropriate accessibility to all women. In addition, by review of policies that are publicly accessible, authors highlight the importance of transparency to support a common understanding among providers and facilities, and accountability for provision of care.
Vladutiu and colleagues provide a foundational assessment of state guidelines, building the case to support the adoption of standardized language in defining levels of maternal care. This publication is timely, as ACOG/SMFM recently updated the levels of maternal care guidelines in response to feedback from providers throughout the United States.17 Further opportunities to facilitate the adoption of the updated guidelines include implementation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Levels of Care Assessment Tool (LOCATe), designed to provide standardized assessment of facility equipment, capabilities, and staffing using the ACOG/SMFM 2015 and AAP 2012 guidelines.20 LOCATe may also be used as a tool to inform partnership between public health and clinical care. As providers, facilities, and state health departments begin to examine guidelines for levels of maternal care, ensuring the standard of care available to all women is paramount.21
As evidence of the benefits for instituting state level guidelines regarding levels of maternal care continues to develop, consideration of how standardized reporting within and across jurisdictions, maternal mortality review committee recommendations, and quality improvement initiatives could better inform the delivery of risk-appropriate care to decrease pregnancy-related mortality and near miss events is warranted. Such changes could influence broad-ranging prevention efforts, change practice, and impact resource allocation. Both neonatal and maternal risk-appropriate care focus on provision of services to meet the needs of the patients, and state policies that define levels of care can ensure equitable access to services and consideration of the mother–infant dyad in clinical decision-making. Nationwide reviews of state health services policies, such as the work by Vladutiu and colleagues, provide information that can further support partnership between state health departments, delivery facilities, and other stakeholders, to ensure services for women and infants are based on the most current clinical evidence on care capabilities, equipment, and staffing.
Footnotes
Disclaimer
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
References
- 1.Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy. Recommendations for the regional development of maternal and perinatal health services. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy. The 90s and beyond. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy. Enhancing perinatal health through quality, safety and performance initiatives. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 8th edition. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 5.American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics 2012;130:587–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.American Academy of Pediatrics. AAP publications reaffirmed or retired. Pediatrics 2015;136:e1418. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lasswell S, Barfield W, Rochat R, Blackmon L. Perinatal regionalization for very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2010;304:992–1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chung JH, Phibbs CS, Boscardin WJ, Kominski GF, Ortega AN, Needleman J. The effect of neonatal care intensive care level and hospital volume on mortality of very low birth weight infants. Med Care 2010;48:635–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Phibbs CS, Baker LC, Caughey AB, Danielsen B, Schmitt SK, Phibbs RH. Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2165–2175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kroelinger CD, Okoroh EM, Goodman DA, Lasswell SM, Barfield WD. Comparison of state risk-appropriate neonatal care policies with the 2012 AAP policy statement. J Perinatol 2018;38:411–420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Blackmon LR, Barfield WD, Stark AR. Hospital neonatal services in the United States: Variation in definitions, criteria, and regulatory status, 2008. J Perinatol 2009;29:788–794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Okoroh EM, Kroelinger CD, Smith AM, Goodman DA, Barfield WD. US and territory telemedicine policies: Identifying gaps in perinatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:772.e1–e772.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Okoroh EM, Kroelinger CD, Lasswell SM, Goodman DA, Williams AM, Barfield WD. United States and territory policies supporting maternal and neonatal transfer: Review of transport and reimbursement. J Perinatol 2016;36:30–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.D’Alton ME, Bonanno CA, Berkowitz RL, et al. Putting the “M” back in maternal-fetal medicine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:442–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Petersen EE, Davis NL, Goodman D, et al. Vital signs: Pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:423–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 7th edition. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 17.American Association of Birth Centers, Association of Women’s Health Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Obstetric care consensus, number 9: Levels of maternal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;134:e41–e55. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zahn CM, Remick A, Catalano A, Goodman D, Kilpatrick SJ, Menard MK. Levels of maternal care verification pilot: Translating guidance into practice. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:1401–1406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vladitiu C, Minneart J, Sosa S, Menard K. Levels of maternal care in the United States: An assessment of publicly available state guidelines. J Womens Health 2019. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Catalano A, Bennett A, Busacker A, et al. Implementing CDC’s level of care assessment tool (LOCATe): A national collaboration to improve maternal and child health. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017;26:1265–1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Howell EA, Zeitlin J. Quality of care and disparities in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2017;44:13–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]