Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1996 Apr;50(2):144–148. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.2.144

Risk factor analysis of data from assessment clinics in the UK breast screening programme: a case-control study in Portsmouth and Southampton.

E Thomas 1, J Cade 1, A Vail 1
PMCID: PMC1060242  PMID: 8762378

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim was to quantify the influence of demographic and reproductive factors on breast cancer. The subjects' path through the screening clinic, the inherent differences between the control groups, and the possible biases when using screening programmes were also considered. DESIGN: A case-control study using both personal contact and postal questionnaires to gather demographic and reproductive information. SETTING: Women attending two breast screening recall clinics in Portsmouth and Southampton over the period 1990-92. PARTICIPANTS: Altogether 1813 subjects between the ages of 50 and 65 years. The subjects' disease status was ascertained using a mammography and classified into four categories: 253 breast cancer (cases); 207 benign breast disease (BD); 410 requiring early rescreen (ER); and 943 for standard recall (SR). The BD, ER, and SR groups were used as separate controls. MAIN RESULTS: Of the factors considered here, the only two that showed a consistently significant effect on the risk of breast cancer were age and body mass index (BMI). Odds ratios were calculated for five yearly age groups and four groups of BMI using the youngest and lightest group as the baseline, respectively. There seemed to be an increase in the risk of breast cancer for increasing age for each comparison made (for cases v SR:OR (95% CI) = 1.60 (1.10, 2.34), 2.54 (1.76, 3.68)). All subjects above the lowest quartile of BMI experienced increased risk, although a trend was not clear (for cases v SR: OR (95% CI) = 1.66 (1.03, 2.66), 1.37 (0.86, 2.20), 1.98 (1.24, 3.15)). CONCLUSIONS: Various other potential risk factors were found to be inconsistently significant depending on choice of control group. This may help in understanding the differences between the three control groups used.

Full text

PDF
144

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. De Waard F., Cornelis J. P., Aoki K., Yoshida M. Breast cancer incidence according to weight and height in two cities of the Netherlands and in Aichi prefecture, Japan. Cancer. 1977 Sep;40(3):1269–1275. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197709)40:3<1269::aid-cncr2820400341>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hunter D. J., Willett W. C. Diet, body size, and breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(1):110–132. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kalache A., Maguire A., Thompson S. G. Age at last full-term pregnancy and risk of breast cancer. Lancet. 1993 Jan 2;341(8836):33–36. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92497-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kelsey J. L., Berkowitz G. S. Breast cancer epidemiology. Cancer Res. 1988 Oct 15;48(20):5615–5623. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kelsey J. L. Breast cancer epidemiology: summary and future directions. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(1):256–263. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. La Vecchia C., Decarli A., Parazzini F., Gentile A., Negri E., Cecchetti G., Franceschi S. General epidemiology of breast cancer in northern Italy. Int J Epidemiol. 1987 Sep;16(3):347–355. doi: 10.1093/ije/16.3.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lubin F., Ruder A. M., Wax Y., Modan B. Overweight and changes in weight throughout adult life in breast cancer etiology. A case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Oct;122(4):579–588. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MacMahon B., Cole P., Lin T. M., Lowe C. R., Mirra A. P., Ravnihar B., Salber E. J., Valaoras V. G., Yuasa S. Age at first birth and breast cancer risk. Bull World Health Organ. 1970;43(2):209–221. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Negri E., La Vecchia C., Bruzzi P., Dardanoni G., Decarli A., Palli D., Parazzini F., Rosselli del Turco M. Risk factors for breast cancer: pooled results from three Italian case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Dec;128(6):1207–1215. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rohan T. E., Bain C. J. Diet in the etiology of breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev. 1987;9:120–145. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wynder E. L., MacCornack F. A., Stellman S. D. The epidemiology of breast cancer in 785 United States Caucasian women. Cancer. 1978 Jun;41(6):2341–2354. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197806)41:6<2341::aid-cncr2820410637>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES