Abstract
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide. Systematic search of Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase was performed in order to find all the articles reporting 10+ years of LSG results. Eleven studies including 1020 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall weighted mean %TWL was 24.4% (17–36.9%), and remission rates from TD2M to HTN were 45.6% (0–94.7%) and 41.4% (0–78.4%), respectively. De novo GERD had an overall prevalence of 32.3% (21.4–58.4%), and five cases (0.5%) of Barrett’s disease were reported. Revisional surgery was required for 19.2% (1–49.5%) of patients, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass being the most common secondary procedure.
Keywords: Sleeve gastrectomy, GERD, Long-term results, Barrett’s disease
Introduction
Obesity pandemic continues to spread worldwide with an estimated prevalence of 51% by 2030 [1]. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective treatment for severe obesity and associated medical problems [2, 3].
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed MBS since 2014 [4, 5]. It was first introduced by Marceau et al. [6] in 1998 as a modification of the first stage distal gastrectomy of the biliopancreatic diversion surgery. Shortly thereafter in 1999, the laparoscopic approach was applied to sleeve gastrectomy by Ren et al [7]. Considering the accumulating data on its safety and short-term effectiveness, Gumbs et al. [8] recommended in 2007 to perform SG as a stand-alone MBS.
However, LSG has been recently questioned by several studies, whose results have shown a worrisome rate of postoperative gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) [9, 10]. Some articles have also described intestinal metaplasia (Barrett’s disease) after LSG due to the chronic exposure of the lower esophagus to reflux [11]. Evidence of worse outcomes in high BMI patients has also been published [12].
The purpose of this study was to review metabolic outcomes, rates of de novo GERD, and revisional surgery at 10+ years after LSG.
Methods
Literature Search
In Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, a systematic search was performed using the terms “long-term” and “sleeve gastrectomy.” Only original articles in the English language including results at 10 or more years after LSG were included. No temporal interval was set. PRISMA flowchart for reporting meta-analysis [13] was used. References of the articles were further searched to find additional studies. Two independent reviewers performed the screening of titles and abstracts.
Data Extraction
Following data were extracted using a standardized form: first author and year of publication, study design, type of bariatric surgery, percentage of total weight loss at 10 years (%TWL), remission rates from diabetes (TD2M) and hypertension (HTN), prevalence of de novo gastro-esophageal reflux (GERD) and Barrett’s disease, and percentage and type of revisional surgery.
Data Analysis
Extracted continuous and categorical variables were reported as mean ± deviation standard and percentages, respectively. Overall means and percentages were calculated weighting the extracted data for the sample size of the article.
Results
The literature search found a total of 2766 articles; 1056 duplicates were removed before screening. After removal of case reports, reviews/meta-analysis and non-English studies 1710 articles on LSG were screened. The PRISMA flow chart for the study selection is shown in Fig. 1. Ten retrospective, [14–23] papers and one randomized controlled study [24] reporting outcomes of LSG after 10 or more years were eventually included in the present study.
Sample size of these articles ranged from 34 to 215 (total number 1020) patients. Only three papers reported a multicenter experience, while the other eight published a single-center case series (Table 1). All articles followed international guidelines on BMI threshold for metabolic surgery [25], and remission of diabetes was considered as fasting blood glucose < 126 mg/dl on two different occasions and as a value of glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) < 6.55% without necessity for antidiabetic medications [26]. Hypertension remission was defined as blood pressure < 140/90 with no requirement for antihypertensive medication [27]. Follow-up ranged from 44 to 100%, while GERD was diagnosed on the base of symptoms.
Table 1.
Author, year | Number of patients | Study design | B.M.I (mean ± SD) | %TWL (mean ± SD) | T2DM resolution | HTN resolution | De novo GERD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arman, 2016 | 65 | Retrospective multi-center | 38.8 ± 7.5 | 21 ± 12.8 | N/A | 28.6%* | 21.4% |
Castagneto Gissey, 2018 | 114 | Retrospective single-center | 46.6±7.3 | 30.9 ± 12.4 | 64.7% | 44.2% | 42.9% |
Chang, 2018 | 65 | Retrospective single-center | 37.9 ± 7.7 | 26.6 ± 10 | 39.6% | 78.4% | 58.4% |
Jimenez, 2020 | 123 | Retrospective single-center | 46.3 ± 5.1 | 25.3±11.2 | 57.7% | 14% | N/A |
Felsenreich, 2021 | 53 | Retrospective multi-center | 48.7 ± 9.2 | 36.9 ±11.7 | 0% | 50% | 18.9% |
Hauters, 2021 | 34 | Retrospective single-center | 36 ± 8 | 17 ± 15 | 12% | 17% | 41% |
Musella, 2021 | 76 | Retrospective single-center | 45.1 ± 4.8 | 22.2 ± 13 | 0% | 51.4% | 25.7% |
Kraljević, 2021 | 215 | Retrospective single-center | 46.4 ± 8.0 | 21.6 ± 14.1 | 61% | 60.5% | 32.4% |
Kehagias, 2022 | 104 | Retrospective single-center | 43.4 ± 2.9 | 29 ± 11 | 94.7% | 40% | 43% |
Avidan, 2023 | 80 | Retrospective single-center | 43.86 ± 6.36 | 19.3 ± 16.7 | 47% | 43.7% | 40% |
Salminen, 2022 | 91 | Randomized controlled trial, multicenter | 47.3 | 23.4 | 26% | 8% | 43%** |
FU follow-up, T2DM type 2 diabetes, HTN hypertension, EWL excess weight loss, GERD gastroesophageal reflux disease, N/A not available
*Includes patients with resolution and/or improvement of T2D/HTN
**Includes patients with worsening of preoperative symptoms
Eight (80%) studies reported a %TWL >20 [28] and the overall weighted mean TWL was 24.4% (17–36.9%). Weighted remission rates from TD2M and HTN were 45.6% (0–94.7%) and 41.4% (14–78.4%), respectively. De novo GERD had an overall weighted prevalence of 32.3% (21.4–58.4%) with five cases of Barrett’s disease reported in the eleven included studies (incidence = 0.5%). Revisional surgery was necessary for 19.2% (1–49.5%) of patients and the type of revision was clearly reported in 183 cases. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 123, 67.2%) was the most common secondary procedure, followed by Duodenal Switch (DS; n = 36, 19.7%), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB; n = 12, 6.6%), single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI-S; n = 10, 5.5%), hiatal hernia repair (n = 1, 0.5%), re-sleeve (n = 1, 0.5%), and banding (n = 2, 1%). RYGB and hiatal hernia repair were performed mostly to treat GERD, while OAGB, DS, SADI-S, re-sleeve, and banding were chosen in case of weight persistence/recurrence Table 2.
Table 2.
Author, year | Revisional surgery for GERD | Type of revision for GERD | Revisional surgery for IWL/WR | Type of revision for IWL/WR | Revisional surgery during FU |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arman, 2016 | 4.8% | RYGB, hiatoplasty | 26.9% | RYGB, DS | 31.7% |
Castagneto Gissey, 2018 | 1.8% | RYGB | 0% | / | 1.8% |
Chang, 2018 | N/A | RYGB, hiatoplasty | N/A | RYGB | 21.5% |
Jimenez, 2020 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 23.8% |
Felsenreich, 2021 | 18.9% | RYGB | 26.4% | DS | 49.1%* |
Hauters, 2021 | 0% | / | 18% | RYGB | 18% |
Musella, 2021 | 2.6% | RYGB | 13.2% | OAGB | 15.8% |
Kraljević, 2021 | 3.9% | RYGB | 7.8% | DS | 19.2%** |
Kehagias, 2022 | 1% | RYGB | 0% | / | 1% |
Avidan, 2023 | 0% | / | 21.25% | RYGB, OAGB | 21.3% |
Salminen, 2022 | 21.1% | RYGB | 7.8% | SADI-S | 28.9% |
GERD gastroesophageal reflux disease, IWL/WR insufficient weight loss/weight regain, RYGB Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, DS duodenal switch, OAGB one anastomosis gastric bypass
*3.8% were converted due to acute leak
**7.5% were converted due to both GERD and IWL/WR
Discussion
Despite its growing success, there is an ongoing debate on long-term results of LSG. Specifically, there has always been some skepticism regarding durable effectiveness of restrictive surgery [29] and risks of Barrett’s disease due to de novo GERD [30].
In a previous systematic review published in 2017 on results of SG, Juodeikis and Brimas [31] found that the mean excess weight loss was 58% at 5 years, 78% of patients had resolution of type 2 diabetes, and 68% had resolution of hypertension. In another meta-analysis on the 7 years or more outcomes of SG published in 2018, Clapp et al. [32] found nine relevant studies. The estimated weight regain was 28%, and the estimated overall revision rate was 20%, being weight regain the main cause for reintervention. Surprisingly, in a systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2019 by O’Brien et al. [33] discussing MBS outcomes at 10 years or more, there were only two relevant studies on SG.
The SLEEVEPASS [24] randomized controlled trial demonstrated that although gastric bypass compared to sleeve gastrectomy was associated with greater percentage of excess weight loss at 10 years, rates of BE were comparable.
The current meta-analysis demonstrates that LSG induces outstanding metabolic results at 10+years with %TWL > 20% and satisfactory average remission rates of TDM2 and HTN years. However, two studies reported 0% remission from TDM2 suggesting that LSG could be less effective than other metabolic interventions for the treatment of this disease.
Despite the IFSO task force [34] stated that incidence of Barrett’s esophagus after SG is 4.6% within 5 years, we found only five cases reported out of 1020 patients. However, it is important to note that de novo GERD developed in one third of cases.
Revisional surgery due to weight persistence/recurrence of GERD confirmed to be a significant issue in long-term after LSG. One out of five patients was converted to a secondary intervention within 10 years, being the bypass procedures the most frequent choice as revision.
Strength and Limitations
Ten out of eleven studies included in this systematic review were retrospective. Follow-up duration varies from 10 to 15 years. There is not a one standard surgical technique for SG which can interfere with outcomes. There are several definitions used for weight regain, which can also affect decision of revision. Not all patients underwent an endoscopy, and it is therefore not possible to determine the precise incidence of BE. Some of the patients included in the abovementioned articles had secondary and not primary SG.
Conclusion
LSG shows satisfactory results at 10 years in terms of weight loss (%TWL > 20) and remission from HTN. Long-term outcomes of the sleeve gastrectomy on TD2M should be further investigated by prospective trials. Even if one third of patients may develop new onset GERD, less than 20% of individuals requires revisional surgery within 10 years from LSG.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Declarations
Ethical Approval
This report does not describe any study with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
Informed consent does not apply.
Conflict of Interest
Authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Key points
•Mean %TWL > 20 is reported at 10 or more years after LSG.
•Remission rate from T2DM and HTN is 40% at 10 or more years after LSG.
•One third of patients may develop new onset GERD within 10 years from LSG.
•A secondary procedure is required in less than 20% of cases.
A. Vitiello and A.A. Abeid should share the first position.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Finkelstein EA, Khavjou OA, Thompson H, et al. Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):563–570. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sjöström L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial - a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219–234. doi: 10.1111/joim.12012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–651. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Erratum to: Bariatric surgery and endoluminal procedures: IFSO Worldwide Survey 2014. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2290–2292. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2773-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric Surgery Survey 2018: similarities and disparities among the 5 IFSO chapters. Obes Surg. 2021;31(5):1937–1948. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05207-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marceau P, Biron S, Bourque RA, Potvin M, Hould FS, Simard S. Biliopancreatic diversion with a new type of gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 1993;3(1):29–35. doi: 10.1381/096089293765559728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10(6):514–523. doi: 10.1381/096089200321593715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gumbs AA, Gagner M, Dakin G, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2007;17(7):962–969. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9151-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Melissas J, Braghetto I, Molina JC, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015;25:2430–2435. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1906-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stenard F, Iannelli A. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(36):10348–10357. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Genco A, Soricelli E, Casella G, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a possible, underestimated long-term complication. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(4):568–574. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vitiello A, Berardi G, Velotti N, et al. Should sleeve gastrectomy be considered only as a first step in super obese patients? 5-year results from a single center. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020;31(2):203–207. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Felsenreich DM, Artemiou E, Steinlechner K, et al. Fifteen years after sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss, remission of associated medical problems, quality of life, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-long-term follow-up in a multicenter study. Obes Surg. 2021;31(8):3453–3461. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05475-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Castagneto Gissey L, Casella Mariolo JR, et al. 10-year follow-up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: outcomes in a monocentric series. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:1480–1487. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hauters P, Dubart JW, Desmet J, et al. Ten-year outcomes after primary vertical sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a monocentric cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:6466–6471. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08137-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Musella M, Berardi G, Velotti N, et al. Ten-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: retrospective matched comparison with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding-is there a significant difference in long-term? Obes Surg. 2021;31(12):5267–5274. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05735-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kraljević M, Cordasco V, Schneider R, et al. Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: what are the results beyond 10 years? Obes Surg. 2021;31(8):3427–3433. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05437-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chang DM, Lee WJ, Chen JC, et al. Thirteen-year experience of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: surgical risk, weight loss, and revision procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28:2991–2997. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3344-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J, et al. Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;(10):1778–86. 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 19 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.Jiménez A, Ibarzabal A, Moizé V, Pané A, Andreu A, Molero J, de Hollanda A, Flores L, Ortega E, Lacy A, Vidal J. Ten-year outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: an observational nonrandomized cohort study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(3):382–388. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Avidan R, Abu-Abeid A, Keidar A, et al. Ten-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospectively designed study of a single tertiary center. Obes Surg. 2023;33(1):173–178. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06349-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kehagias I, Bellou A, Kehagias D, et al. Long-term (11 + years) efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy as a stand-alone bariatric procedure: a single-center retrospective observational study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;408(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02734-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Salminen P, Grönroos S, Helmiö M, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss, comorbidities, and reflux at 10 years in adult patients with obesity: the SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2022;157(8):656–666. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, et al. 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33(1):3–14. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06332-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.American Diabetes Association Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S62–S69. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.National Institute for Health and Clinical excellence. Hypertension (CG127). http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg127. October 30, 2013.
- 28.Grover BT, Morell MC, Kothari SN, et al. Defining weight loss after bariatric surgery: a call for standardization. OBES SURG. 2019;29:3493–3499. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04022-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vitiello A, Pilone V, Ferraro L, et al. Is the sleeve gastrectomy always a better procedure? Five-year results from a retrospective matched case-control study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(8):2333–2338. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3161-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gagner M. Response to “Comment on: alarmists at the gates: esophageal adenocarcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy is not different than with other bariatric/metabolic surgery”. Obes Surg. 2022;32:3466–3468. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06242-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Juodeikis Ž, Brimas G. Long-term results after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(4):693–699. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Clapp B, Wynn M, Martyn C, Foster C, O'Dell M, Tyroch A. Long term (7 or more years) outcomes of the sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(6):741–747. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.O'Brien PE, Hindle A, Brennan L, Skinner S, Burton P, Smith A, Crosthwaite G, Brown W. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss at 10 or more years for all bariatric procedures and a single-centre review of 20-year outcomes after adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2019;29(1):3–14. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3525-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fisher OM, Chan DL, Talbot ML, Ramos A, Bashir A, Herrera MF, Himpens J, Shikora S, Higa KD, Kow L, Brown WA. Barrett's oesophagus and bariatric/metabolic surgery-IFSO 2020 Position Statement. Obes Surg. 2021;31(3):915–934. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05143-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]