Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68ae7/68ae73592e9d6f306b39611d856181928aa247f3" alt="473"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf095/bf095e7e4a052d5f74902c7abf9678bd2d4a53cf" alt="474"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Jaeschke R., Singer J., Guyatt G. H. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407–415. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Julious S. A., George S., Campbell M. J. Sample sizes for studies using the short form 36 (SF-36) J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Dec;49(6):642–644. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.6.642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Julious S. A., George S., Campbell M. J. Sample sizes for studies using the short form 36 (SF-36) J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Dec;49(6):642–644. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.6.642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kazis L. E., Anderson J. J., Meenan R. F. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S178–S189. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]