Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1997 Feb;51(1):62–66. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.1.62

Predictors of returning for second round screening at a population based mammographic screening programme in Melbourne, Australia.

J Cockburn 1, P Schofield 1, V White 1, D Hill 1, I Russell 1
PMCID: PMC1060411  PMID: 9135790

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with returning for second round mammography screening. SETTING: This was a population based mammographic screening programme in Melbourne, Australia. DESIGN: A cohort design was used whereby 668 women were interviewed before the screening programme began and attendance for both first and second round screening was ascertained from programme records. The cohort sample was drawn from two regions of a defined area (close to and distant from the screening centre). MAIN RESULTS: Of the 315 women who attended for first round screening, 75% from the proximal sample and 70% from the distal sample returned for second round screening. Attendance at the second round was predicted by the following: the method of recruitment for first round screening, with women who required a letter of invitation and a reminder being less likely to reattend than those who initially attended in response to a community campaign (OR = 0.34; CI 0.19, 0.61); mammographic history before the initial screen, with women who reported previous diagnostic mammography being more likely to reattend than those who did not (OR = 2.97; CI 1.01, 8.9); stated intention of attending for the initial screen, with those with weakest intention of attending for their first round being less likely to attend for second round (OR = 0.44; CI 0.23, 0.85); and increasing scores on a scale that measured preventive orientation to health (OR = 1.24; CI 1.02, 1.50). CONCLUSION: Our findings corroborate other findings of reduced long term attendance for screening from people who are "reluctant participants" initially.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cockburn J., Murphy B., Schofield P., Hill D., Borland R. Development of a strategy to encourage attendance for screening mammography. Health Educ Res. 1991 Sep;6(3):279–290. doi: 10.1093/her/6.3.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fink R., Shapiro S., Roester R. Impact of efforts to increase participation in repetitive screenings for early breast cancer detection. Am J Public Health. 1972 Mar;62(3):328–336. doi: 10.2105/ajph.62.3.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lerman C., Rimer B., Trock B., Balshem A., Engstrom P. F. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med. 1990 May;19(3):279–290. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(90)90028-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lerman C., Trock B., Rimer B. K., Boyce A., Jepson C., Engstrom P. F. Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 15;114(8):657–661. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-8-657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marshall G. A comparative study of re-attenders and non-re-attenders for second triennial National Breast Screening Programme appointments. J Public Health Med. 1994 Mar;16(1):79–86. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Meldrum P., Turnbull D., Dobson H. M., Colquhoun C., Gilmour W. H., McIlwaine G. M. Tailored written invitations for second round breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial. J Med Screen. 1994 Oct;1(4):245–248. doi: 10.1177/096914139400100412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Orton M., Fitzpatrick R., Fuller A., Mant D., Mlynek C., Thorogood M. Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Aug;41(349):320–322. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peeters P. H., Verbeek A. L., Hendriks J. H., van Bon M. J. Screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen. Report of 6 screening rounds, 1975-1986. Int J Cancer. 1989 Feb 15;43(2):226–230. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910430209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schofield P. E., Cockburn J., Hill D. J., Reading D. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies. J Med Screen. 1994 Jul;1(3):144–149. doi: 10.1177/096914139400100303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Taylor V. M., Taplin S. H., Urban N., White E., Peacock S. Repeat mammography use among women ages 50-75. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995 Jun;4(4):409–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vernon S. W., Laville E. A., Jackson G. L. Participation in breast screening programs: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(10):1107–1118. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90297-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES