Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1997 Jun;51(3):289–298. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.3.289

Estimating potential savings in cancer deaths by eliminating regional and social class variation in cancer survival in the Nordic countries.

P W Dickman 1, R W Gibberd 1, T Hakulinen 1
PMCID: PMC1060475  PMID: 9229059

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine equity in the health care system with regard to cancer patient care by estimating the level of systematic regional variation in cancer survival in the Nordic countries. Specifically, those cancer sites which exhibit high levels of systematic regional variation in survival and hence inequity were identified. Estimating the reduction in cancer deaths which could be achieved by eliminating this variation so that everyone receives effective care will provide a readily interpretable measure of the amount of systematic regional variation. A comprehensive analysis of regional variation in survival has not previously been conducted so appropriate statistical methodology must be developed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All those aged 0-90 years who had been diagnosed with at least one of 12 common malignant neoplasms between 1977 and 1992 in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. DESIGN: A separate analysis was conducted for each country. Regression models for the relative survival ratio were used to estimate the relative risk of excess mortality attributable to cancer in each region after correcting for age and sex. An estimate of the amount of systematic regional variation in survival was obtained by subtracting the estimated expected random variation from the observed regional variation. An estimate was then made of the potential reduction in the number of cancer deaths for 2008-12 if regional variation in survival were eliminated so that everyone received the same level of effective care. MAIN RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2012, an estimated 2.5% of deaths from cancers in the 12 sites studied could be prevented by eliminating regional variation in survival. The percentage of potentially avoidable deaths did not depend on country or sex but it did depend on cancer site. There was no relationship between the level of regional variation in a given country and the level of survival. The cancer sites for which the greatest percentage savings could be achieved were melanoma (11%) and cervix uteri (6%). The sites for which the highest number of deaths could be prevented were prostate, colon, melanoma, and breast. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology showed a small amount of systematic regional variation in cancer survival in the Nordic countries. The cancer sites with high levels of regional variation identified are potential targets for cancer control programmes.

Full text

PDF
289

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Auvinen A., Karjalainen S., Pukkala E. Social class and cancer patient survival in Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Nov 15;142(10):1089–1102. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buckley J. D. Additive and multiplicative models for relative survival rates. Biometrics. 1984 Mar;40(1):51–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cain K. C., Diehr P. Testing the null hypothesis in small area analysis. Health Serv Res. 1992 Aug;27(3):267–294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diehr P., Cain K., Connell F., Volinn E. What is too much variation? The null hypothesis in small-area analysis. Health Serv Res. 1990 Feb;24(6):741–771. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Estève J., Benhamou E., Croasdale M., Raymond L. Relative survival and the estimation of net survival: elements for further discussion. Stat Med. 1990 May;9(5):529–538. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hakama M., Karjalainen S., Hakulinen T. Outcome-based equity in the treatment of colon cancer patients in Finland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(4):619–630. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hakulinen T. A comparison of nationwide cancer survival statistics in Finland and Norway. World Health Stat Q. 1983;36(1):35–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Henson D. E., Ries L. A. The relative survival rate. Cancer. 1995 Nov 15;76(10):1687–1688. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19951115)76:10<1687::aid-cncr2820761002>3.0.co;2-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karjalainen S. Geographical variation in cancer patient survival in Finland: chance, confounding, or effect of treatment? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Sep;44(3):210–214. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.3.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Karjalainen S., Pukkala E. Social class as a prognostic factor in breast cancer survival. Cancer. 1990 Aug 15;66(4):819–826. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900815)66:4<819::aid-cncr2820660437>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mooney G. H. Equity in health care: confronting the confusion. Eff Health Care. 1983 Dec;1(4):179–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mooney G. What does equity in health mean? World Health Stat Q. 1987;40(4):296–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pollock A. M., Vickers N. The impact on colorectal cancer survival of cases registered by 'death certificate only': implications for national survival rates. Br J Cancer. 1994 Dec;70(6):1229–1231. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rimpelä A. H., Pukkala E. I. Cancers of affluence: positive social class gradient and rising incidence trend in some cancer forms. Soc Sci Med. 1987;24(7):601–606. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90064-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SAXEN E., HAKAMA M. CANCER ILLNESS IN FINLAND WITH A NOTE ON THE EFFECTS OF AGE ADJUSTMENT AND EARLY DIAGNOSIS. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn. 1964;42:SUPPL 2–328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Walter S. D., Birnie S. E. Mapping mortality and morbidity patterns: an international comparison. Int J Epidemiol. 1991 Sep;20(3):678–689. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.3.678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Walter S. D. The analysis of regional patterns in health data. I. Distributional considerations. Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Sep 15;136(6):730–741. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Walter S. D. The analysis of regional patterns in health data. II. The power to detect environmental effects. Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Sep 15;136(6):742–759. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Westerling R. Components of small area variation in death rates: a method applied to data from Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Apr;49(2):214–221. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.2.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES