Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1997 Jun;51(3):320–325. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.3.320

Prospective versus retrospective measurement of change in health status: a community based study in Geneva, Switzerland.

T V Perneger 1, J F Etter 1, A Rougemont 1
PMCID: PMC1060480  PMID: 9229064

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare prospective and retrospective measurements of change in health status. DESIGN: Health status was measured using a French language version of the short form 36 (SF-36) health survey on two occasions one year apart--in 1992 and 1993. Differences in SF-36 scores measured prospectively were compared with the patients' single item retrospective evaluation of change in health (transition item). SETTING: This was a community based study among members of two health insurance plans in Geneva, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Altogether 831 young adults (mean age 30 years at baseline). MAIN RESULTS: Health status remained stable on average during the study period. The retrospective rating correlated well with changes in health measured prospectively: those who said in 1993 that their current health was "much worse" than in 1992 experienced an average decrease of 1.06 SD on the eight SF-36 scales, while those who said that their health was "much better" recorded an average improvement of 0.43 SD. The associations between prospective and retrospective assessments of change were approximately linear for all scales but physical functioning. The transition item also discriminated between time periods: transition reported for 1991-92 did not correlate with changes recorded for 1992-93. Relative validity analyses indicated that the transition item was better suited to capture changes in general health than changes in purely physical or mental aspects of health. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance between retrospective and prospective measures of change in health suggests that both are sensitive, to some extent, to true changes in health status. Using both types of assessment may improve the reliability of measurements of change.

Full text

PDF
320

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aaronson N. K., Acquadro C., Alonso J., Apolone G., Bucquet D., Bullinger M., Bungay K., Fukuhara S., Gandek B., Keller S. International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res. 1992 Oct;1(5):349–351. doi: 10.1007/BF00434949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aseltine R. H., Jr, Carlson K. J., Fowler F. J., Jr, Barry M. J. Comparing prospective and retrospective measures of treatment outcomes. Med Care. 1995 Apr;33(4 Suppl):AS67–AS76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brazier J. E., Harper R., Jones N. M., O'Cathain A., Thomas K. J., Usherwood T., Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160–164. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deyo R. A., Centor R. M. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(11):897–906. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90038-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deyo R. A., Diehr P., Patrick D. L. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991 Aug;12(4 Suppl):142S–158S. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(05)80019-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Epstein R. S., Deverka P. A., Chute C. G., Panser L., Oesterling J. E., Lieber M. M., Schwartz S., Patrick D. Validation of a new quality of life questionnaire for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Dec;45(12):1431–1445. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90205-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fitzpatrick R., Fletcher A., Gore S., Jones D., Spiegelhalter D., Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment. BMJ. 1992 Oct 31;305(6861):1074–1077. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6861.1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garratt A. M., Ruta D. A., Abdalla M. I., Buckingham J. K., Russell I. T. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1440–1444. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Guyatt G. H., Deyo R. A., Charlson M., Levine M. N., Mitchell A. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(5):403–408. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90128-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guyatt G., Walter S., Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):171–178. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hays R. D., Hadorn D. Responsiveness to change: an aspect of validity, not a separate dimension. Qual Life Res. 1992 Feb;1(1):73–75. doi: 10.1007/BF00435438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jaeschke R., Singer J., Guyatt G. H. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407–415. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kantz M. E., Harris W. J., Levitsky K., Ware J. E., Jr, Davies A. R. Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement. Med Care. 1992 May;30(5 Suppl):MS240–MS252. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Katz J. N., Larson M. G., Phillips C. B., Fossel A. H., Liang M. H. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care. 1992 Oct;30(10):917–925. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199210000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lansky D., Butler J. B., Waller F. T. Using health status measures in the hospital setting: from acute care to 'outcomes management'. Med Care. 1992 May;30(5 Suppl):MS57–MS73. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liang M. H., Fossel A. H., Larson M. G. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990 Jul;28(7):632–642. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199007000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liang M. H., Larson M. G., Cullen K. E., Schwartz J. A. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum. 1985 May;28(5):542–547. doi: 10.1002/art.1780280513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MacKenzie C. R., Charlson M. E., DiGioia D., Kelley K. Can the Sickness Impact Profile measure change? An example of scale assessment. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(6):429–438. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90110-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McHorney C. A., Ware J. E., Jr, Raczek A. E. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247–263. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Perneger T. V., Etter J. F., Rougemont A. Switching Swiss enrollees from indemnity health insurance to managed care: the effect on health status and stisfaction with care. Am J Public Health. 1996 Mar;86(3):388–393. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.3.388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Perneger T. V., Leplège A., Etter J. F., Rougemont A. Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in young healthy adults. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Aug;48(8):1051–1060. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00227-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stucki G., Liang M. H., Fossel A. H., Katz J. N. Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Nov;48(11):1369–1378. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00054-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wagner E. H., LaCroix A. Z., Grothaus L. C., Hecht J. A. Responsiveness of health status measures to change among older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Mar;41(3):241–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ware J. E., Jr, Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES