Abstract
Simple Summary
This review is focused on the interactions of the CD44 cytoplasmic tail in order to unravel the high complexity of CD44 functions. CD44 serves as a cell surface receptor for various extracellular matrix molecules, mainly hyaluronan, and messenger molecules, such as growth factors, and has important functions in normal and disease states, the predominant one being cancer. CD44 coordinates both structural and signaling events through its highly conserved intracellular domain. Although short and devoid of any enzymatic activity, the CD44 intracellular domain possesses structural motifs that promote the interactions with cytoplasmic effectors involved in important cellular pathways, including cell trafficking, transcription, and metabolism, which regulate cellular functions like growth, survival, differentiation, stemness, and therapeutic resistance.
Abstract
CD44 is a single-chain transmembrane receptor that exists in multiple forms due to alternative mRNA splicing and post-translational modifications. CD44 is the main cell surface receptor of hyaluronan as well as other extracellular matrix molecules, cytokines, and growth factors that play important roles in physiological processes (such as hematopoiesis and lymphocyte homing) and the progression of various diseases, the predominant one being cancer. Currently, CD44 is an established cancer stem cell marker in several tumors, implying a central functional role in tumor biology. The present review aims to highlight the contribution of the CD44 short cytoplasmic tail, which is devoid of any enzymatic activity, in the extraordinary functional diversity of the receptor. The interactions of CD44 with cytoskeletal proteins through specific structural motifs within its intracellular domain drives cytoskeleton rearrangements and affects the distribution of organelles and transport of molecules. Moreover, the CD44 intracellular domain specifically interacts with various cytoplasmic effectors regulating cell-trafficking machinery, signal transduction pathways, the transcriptome, and vital cell metabolic pathways. Understanding the cell type- and context-specificity of these interactions may unravel the high complexity of CD44 functions and lead to novel improved therapeutic interventions.
Keywords: CD44, cancer, transcriptome, cell metabolism, cell growth, cell trafficking
1. Introduction
The main function of cell surface transmembrane receptors is to sense extracellular signals and transduce them into an intracellular response. Most often, they bind to their specific ligand(s), leading to their conformational change and activation, which in turn alters their association with the cytoskeletal network and/or downstream signal transduction pathways to enable cells to respond to changes in their microenvironment. As such, CD44 is a single-chain transmembrane glycoprotein/part-time proteoglycan that belongs to the class of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs). The human gene encoding CD44 contains 19 exons and is located at chromosome 11p13. Exons 1 to 16 give rise to the extracellular domain (ectodomain) of CD44: the N-terminal signal sequence (exon 1), the link-homology hyaluronan-binding module (exons 2 and 3), and the stem region (exons 4–16). Exon 17 encodes the hydrophobic single-pass transmembrane domain, and exon 19 encodes the 73-amino-acid intracellular domain (ICD) or cytoplasmic tail of CD44 [1]. The inclusion of exon 18, normally absent in most CD44 transcripts, results in a short five-amino-acid cytoplasmic tail, which is generated by the use of an alternative translation stop codon [2]. Exons 1–5, 16, 17, and 19 are constant and common to all CD44 isoforms. The standard form of CD44 (CD44s) is encoded by these constant exons, while CD44 variant forms (CD44v) arise from the combination of constant exons with variable exons 7–15 (identified as v2–v10) into the stem region as a result of alternative mRNA splicing, giving CD44 proteins the potential for vast structural and functional diversity. Further post-translational modifications such as glycosylation with O-glycans, N-glycans, and glycosaminoglycans in specific CD44 isoforms add to the complexity and diversity of CD44 proteins. Importantly, the link-homology hyaluronan-binding domain, the transmembrane domain, and the cytoplasmic tail of CD44 show high similarity between species [3,4]. This remarkable sequence conservation indicates the important role of these domains in CD44 functions.
As a cell surface receptor, CD44 interacts with various extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules, such as hyaluronan (HA), osteopontin, collagen, fibronectin, and laminin, as well as growth factors and cytokines, MMPs, and serglycin proteoglycan [5]. Many of these interactions are cell-type-dependent and contribute to the plethora of CD44 functions. For example, CD44 can exist in “inactive” or “active” states according to the binding affinity to its main ligand HA [6]. In its “active” state, CD44 binds to HA, resulting in the promotion of cell migration, chemotaxis, rolling, and adhesion, as well as the organization of an HA-rich pericellular milieu and also the internalization and metabolism of HA. As a consequence, these CD44–HA interactions regulate several aspects of cellular behavior such as cell proliferation, growth, survival, differentiation, and pericellular matrix remodeling. However, the long list of functions of CD44 also include HA-independent activities. Importantly, CD44 is an established cancer stem cell (CSC) marker in several tumor types [7]; for example, the CD44 and CD271 in human head and neck squamous cancer cells [8] and the CD44 and CD133 in colorectal cancer cells [9]. These observations imply a central functional role in tumor biology when considering that CD44 is able to promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and therefore invasiveness and metastasis [10,11,12].
Although modifications of the extracellular domain of CD44 (such as O-/N-glycosylation, glycosaminoglycan substitution, and alternative splicing) regulate important functions of CD44, they cannot fully explain its critical involvement in such diverse cellular processes. Intracellular events also regulate CD44 actions, and this requires a functional intracellular domain. Given that CD44 lacks any intrinsic enzymatic (e.g., kinase) activity, it must be able to organize both membrane and cytosolic components and coordinate their functions. It is now evident that the short cytoplasmic tail of CD44 contains several structural motifs with the potential to selectively interact with cytoskeletal proteins and signaling effectors, often in cooperation with adjacent plasma membrane receptors. The assembly and coordination of such structural and signaling events can be regulated by post-translational modifications of the transmembrane and intracellular domains of CD44, such as palmitoylation, phosphorylation. and proteolytic processing.
2. Structural Features of CD44 ICD
The transmembrane and intracellular domains of CD44 are required for its proper membrane localization, ligand binding, and functions such as cell adhesion and migration [4]. For instance, mutation or deletion of the ICD results in the aberrant localization of CD44 within cellular membranes, an inability to bind HA, and impaired HA-mediated cell migration and tumor development [13,14,15,16]. Therefore, these highly conserved domains are essential for ligand binding and subsequent downstream intracellular events (i.e., outside-in signaling), probably by promoting the stabilization and clustering of CD44 receptors at the plasma membrane [4,13,17]. In contrast, their precise amino acid sequence is not a prerequisite for CD44 functions, since the replacement of either domain with equivalent domains from different adhesion receptors does not impair binding to HA, cell adhesion to HA matrices, or rolling interaction of lymphoid cells with HA pericellular coats [13,18], suggesting that the shape and conformation of these domains do not affect the inside-out signaling of CD44.
The 72-amino-acid-residue cytoplasmic tail contains two positively charged amino acid clusters in the juxtamembrane domain (292RRRCGQKKK300), which constitute the FERM-binding domain that mediates the interaction of CD44 with ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) cytoskeletal proteins [19,20]. This sequence also contains the putative acylation site Cys295, suggesting that partition of CD44 into lipid rafts may regulate CD44 association with ERM proteins (see Section 4, “Regulation of cytoskeletal organization and cell phenotype”). The FERM-binding domain is followed by the ankyrin-binding domain (304NSGNGAVEDRKPSGL318) [16], an additional cytoskeleton association site, the dihydrophobic basolateral targeting motif 331LV332 [21], and four C-terminal amino acids (358KIGV361) that represent the PDZ (PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1)-domain-binding peptide [4] (Figure 1).
The CD44 cytoplasmic tail can be phosphorylated, and this phosphorylation is restricted to Ser residues [4,22]. Although it contains seven Ser residues (at positions 291, 305, 316, 323, 325, 336, and 337), only Ser291, Ser316, and Ser325 are subject to phosphorylation (Figure 1). Mutagenesis studies demonstrated that Ser325 is the primary site of constitutive CD44 phosphorylation, which is estimated to occur on approximately one-third of CD44 molecules and is mediated by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) [23]. The neighboring Ser323 residue, however, is not phosphorylated but is required for the binding of CaMKII to the receptor [24]. Functionally, mutations at Ser325 impair HA-mediated cell migration, but they do not affect the receptor’s HA-binding capacity [15,24,25]. The activity of CaMKII and subsequent phosphorylation of CD44 ICD at Ser325 are regulated by the intracellular levels of Ca2+. The influx of Ca2+ and/or its release from the intracellular stores result in the increased cytosolic Ca2+, which binds to calmodulin, leading to the activation of CaMKII. Interestingly, CD44 can trigger mobilization of Ca2+ either by antibody-mediated receptor ligation or HA binding, leading to elevated levels of intracellular Ca2+ [26,27,28]. The constitutive CD44 phosphorylation at Ser325 suggests that CaMKII is maintained in an active state either through reduced phosphatase activity or kinase autophosphorylation that reduces the dissociation rate of the kinase–calmodulin complex, resulting in calmodulin trapping and constitutive active kinase even at low Ca2+ levels [23,29], implying that the regulation of CD44 phosphorylation at Ser325 is complex. Dephosphorylation of Ser325 followed by the concurrent phosphorylation of Ser291 and Ser316 by activated protein kinase C (PKC) reveals a dynamic regulation of CD44 phosphorylation, although the overall levels of CD44 phosphorylation remain almost the same [30]. Ser316 is not a direct substrate of PKC but is found in a predicted protein kinase A (PKA) consensus site [4]. It can be phosphorylated upon cell stimulation (for example, by chemotactic agents such as phorbol esters, which activate PKC), in contrast to resting cells that contain unphosphorylated Ser316 [22,31].
3. Hyaluronan Internalization and Interactions with the Cell-Trafficking Machinery
The dihydrophobic motif 331LV332 within the intracellular tail of CD44 targets the receptor to the basolateral membrane of polarized epithelial cells [21], similarly to other proteins such as the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II invariant chain, the lysosomal integral membrane protein (LIMP)-II, and others [32]. In contrast to these proteins, which undergo clathrin-dependent endocytosis mediated by the LV motif, CD44 has been shown to interact with the non-clathrin-dependent machinery whereby it internalizes its main ligand (HA), suggesting that the intracellular domain of CD44 allows for additional specific interactions that dictate the exclusion of CD44 from clathrin-coated pits. In chondrocytes, for example, CD44 mediates HA internalization through pathways independent from pinocytosis, caveolin, and clathrin [33,34,35].
The critical role of CD44 ICD for HA endocytosis and turnover is evident, since tail-less CD44 mutants have a shortened half-life, reduced stability at the cell surface, and weakened binding to HA and are unable to internalize HA [36]. There are several pathways suggested for CD44-mediated HA internalization. CD44–HA complexes either follow a pathway of trafficking to lysosomes for degradation or follow a pathway in which they are routed directly to the recycling endosomes for return to the plasma membrane. Ubiquitination of CD44 ICD by membrane-associated RING-CH (MARCH)-VIII ubiquitin ligase results in CD44–HA endocytosis and translocation of CD44 into EAA1-containing compartments and late endosomes/lysosomes for degradation [37], while HA is gradually degraded by the coordinated actions of β-endoglycosidase HYAL-1, β-exoglycosidases, β-glucuronidase, and β-N-acetylglucosaminidase [38]. Alternatively, CD44 can be recycled back to the plasma membrane by clathrin-independent sorting proteins such as Hook 1 and EHD proteins. Hook 1, a microtubule- and cargo-tethering protein, promotes microtubule-dependent sorting of CD44 away from the EAA1+ endosomes and into recycling tubules to end up in the plasma membrane [39]. In addition, our proteomic approach identified Eps15 homology domain protein 2 (EHD2), a lipid-raft-residing protein that couples endocytosis to the actin cytoskeleton, as a potential CD44-interacting protein that binds in vitro to the last 15 amino acids of the CD44 C-terminal tail containing the PDZ-binding motif 358KIGV361 [40], suggesting that CD44 harbors internalization signals in its cytoplasmic tail that are recognized by endocytic adaptors. This is in agreement with the observation that the acylation of CD44 at Cys286/Cys295 and its resulting localization into lipid rafts is crucial for HA uptake [35,36,41]. More recently, EHD1 was found to interact with CD44 ICD and promote the endocytic recycling of CD44, thus preventing its lysosomal degradation and increasing CD44 cell surface expression [42]. EHD1 acts as a director of the endocytic trafficking and recycling of internalized cargos [43]. The authors suggested that EHD1 is a key regulator of the Hippo signaling pathway and its downstream target genes (such as SP1) as well as CD44 endocytic recycling and stability. According to their findings, the EHD1/CD44/Hippo/SP1 axis and the concomitant deactivation of Hippo enhance the CSC-like properties, EMT, and metastatic potential of lung adenocarcinoma cells [42].
Interestingly, the interactions of CD44 with cargo transport proteins also contribute to sustained receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling. One such protein is Rab7A, which switches between active Rab7A-GTP and inactive Rab7A-GDP forms. In its active GTP-bound form, Rab7A plays an essential role in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) degradation by regulating its endocytic trafficking to the late endosomes/lysosomes. Wang and colleagues demonstrated that CD44 preferentially binds to the active Rab7A-GTP form and accelerates the formation of inactive Rab7A-GDP, thus inactivating Rab7A activity and inhibiting EGFR degradation [44]. These observations raise the possibility of a more general regulatory role of CD44 on RTK signaling, since CD44 is a negative regulator of Rab7A, which promotes endocytosis-mediated degradation of multiple RTKs.
4. Regulation of Cytoskeletal Organization and Cell Phenotype
In migrating cells, CD44 shows a preferential distribution in actin polymerization regions such as the lamellipodia, filopodia, and apical microvilli, suggesting a role of CD44 in the regulation of actin cytoskeleton reorganization. This regulation is not direct, since CD44 ICD does not contain any binding sites for actin filaments but instead structural motifs such as the FERM (4.1 protein, Ezrin, Radixin, Moesin)-binding domain and the ankyrin-binding domain, which allow CD44 to connect and interact with the cytoskeleton. Specific clusters of basic residues (292RRRCGQKKK300) in the cytoplasmic tail of CD44 constitute the FERM-binding domain that interacts with ERM proteins and merlin/NF2 followed by a structural motif containing Ser316 (304NSGNGAVEDRKPSGL318) that binds the ankyrin cytoskeletal protein [4] (Figure 1).
The ERM proteins and merlin are binding partners for a number of transmembrane receptors (like ICAM, syndecans, L-selectin, and integrins) acting as cross-linkers between the plasma membrane and the cortical actin filaments [45,46,47,48]. The neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) gene encodes the merlin protein, which has tumor-suppressing functions through regulating Hippo signaling, as well as receptor tyrosine kinases and downstream signal transduction pathways [49,50,51]. ERM proteins and merlin show a similar domain organization, with the highest homology in the conserved three-lobe N-terminal FERM domain (head). The ERM and merlin contain extended C-terminal domains, in which ERM has an interaction site for F-actin, whereas merlin lacks a direct actin-binding site. Due to this reason, ERM and merlin may have distinct regulatory mechanisms in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton. Both ERM and merlin can form head-to-tail intra- and/or intermolecular associations, and they can switch between active and inactive conformations through phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events.
Phosphorylation of ERM proteins promotes their transition from the closed “inactive” conformation (head-to-tail self-association) to the open “active” conformation (dissociation of the three-lobed structure from the C-terminal domain) and their recruitment to the plasma membrane, where they bind membrane phospholipids such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate (PIP2). These interactions stabilize ERM proteins close to membrane-associated molecules such as CD44, which adopts a more open conformation at its ICD upon Ser325 phosphorylation [52]. Activated ERM binds to the FERM-binding domain of CD44 ICD phosphorylated at Ser325 (a constitutive phosphorylation site operated by CaMKII), forming a dynamic CD44-cytoskeleton association. This association can be disrupted upon PKC activation, which triggers the complete dephosphorylation of Ser325 followed by the phosphorylation of other Ser residues such as Ser291 and Ser316, leading to dissociation of the ERM proteins from CD44 and its disengagement from the actin cytoskeleton [4,30,53]. In particular, the phosphorylation switch from Ser325 to Ser291 by PKC results in the dissociation of the CD44–ezrin complex, probably because of the proximity of Ser291 to the FERM-binding domain, which is required for CD44-dependent chemotaxis [31]. However, treatment of human epidermal keratinocytes with IL-1β reduced Ser325 phosphorylation and promoted CD44 homomeric complexes, cytoskeletal association of CD44 through binding to ezrin, and extended monocyte-adhesive HA coats, thus enhancing monocyte retention on keratinocytes [54]. These results indicate cell type- and context-specific requirements for the cytoskeletal association of CD44 through post-translational modifications of its cytoplasmic tail, since Ser325 is not directly adjacent to the FERM-binding domain. The binding or exclusion of ezrin depends on its phosphorylation, but it may also involve other cytoplasmic binding proteins of CD44. For example, archaemetzincin-2 (AMZ2), a metalloproteinase of yet unknown function, is the only known protein that was identified by our proteomic approach to interact with a CD44 peptide containing phosphorylated Ser325 [40]. Furthermore, the proximity of Ser325 to the binding domain of another cytoskeletal protein, ankyrin, or the partition of CD44 into membrane lipid rafts would also regulate the CD44–ezrin association [55,56]. In contrast to the ERM proteins, it is the dephosphorylated form of merlin that binds CD44 ICD. Phosphorylation of merlin at its C-terminal tail generates the open conformation of the protein, resulting in the inactivation of its tumor-suppressing activity [57]. Several Ser/Thr kinases (including PKA, Akt, and p21-activated kinase/PAK) are involved in merlin phosphorylation, resulting in either the open “inactive” conformation or its degradation through the ubiquitin–proteasome system [58,59].
Therefore, the phosphorylation status of CD44 at specific Ser residues within the ICD is crucial for the dynamic association of the receptor with the cytoskeletal network and CD44-mediated chemotaxis, motility, and cell phenotypic changes. These events are not random but instead fine-tuned by the coordinated action of kinases and phosphatases. These enzymes could bind directly or indirectly to CD44. For example, ezrin interacts with PKC, thereby acting as a scaffolding protein for other signaling molecules to regulate phosphorylation of CD44 and associated proteins/receptors [60]. On the other hand, the existence of a PDZ-binding motif in CD44 ICD raises the possibility of a direct interaction of CD44 with PDZ domain-containing phosphatases or indirectly through PDZ domain adaptor proteins, which in turn bind protein phosphatases, thereby regulating the phosphorylation level of CD44 itself as well as other adjacent signaling molecules/receptors. For example, binding of syntenin, a syndecan-binding PDZ protein [61], to the C-terminus of protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) eta could result in the recruitment of this transmembrane PTP into syndecan-containing complexes [62,63]. Interestingly, PTP eta is negatively regulated by PKC, so their possible simultaneous recruitment into a CD44-containing complex could result in localized inactivation of the PTP, thereby affecting Tyr phosphorylation of other CD44-associated kinases like PDGFRβ, Met, EGFR, and Src. To identify PDZ domain-containing proteins and other proteins that could interact with the last 15 amino acid residues of CD44 ICD, which includes the PDZ-binding peptide (358KIGV361), we performed a proteomic approach using a peptide-based pull-down assay [40]. The analysis revealed the presence of the IQ-motif containing GTPase activating protein (IQGAP1). IQGAP1 interacts with cytoskeletal proteins, including F-actin, microtubules, and the small Rho GTPases Rac1/Cdc42/RhoA. IQGAP1 acts downstream of Rac1/Cdc42 and modulates the dynamic equilibrium in E-cadherin–β-catenin–α-catenin complexes at cell–cell junctions, thus modulating cell adhesion and migration [64,65,66]. IQGAP1 has been shown to inhibit the intrinsic GTPase activities of Rac1 and RhoA, resulting in the stabilization of their active GTP-bound forms, and it promotes the formation of RhoA-dependent F-actin stress fibers, suggesting an important role for IQGAP1 in the CD44-mediated reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, migration, and proliferation in the presence of HA [67,68]. Other mechanisms involving the Rho-family GTPases also mediate CD44-induced cytoskeletal rearrangements. For example, association of the receptor with RhoA triggers the binding of ankyrin to the specific ankyrin-binding motif of CD44 ICD, which is required for anchorage-independent growth and HA-mediated cell migration [69].
The interaction of CD44 with the actin cytoskeleton through binding to ERM proteins and ankyrin is further stabilized by the partitioning of CD44 into detergent-insoluble, cholesterol-rich nano-domains (lipid rafts) of the plasma membrane [4,69,70] (Figure 1). The highly conserved intramembrane domain of CD44 can be reversibly palmitoylated at Cys286 and Cys295, which enhances localization of the receptor in cellular membranes as well as its interactions with cell surface and cytoplasmic proteins, such as several RTKs, innate receptors (TLRs), ABC transporters, EMMPRIN, PI3K, Src kinases, ezrin, and hyaluronidase 2, which preferentially localize into lipid rafts [71,72,73,74]. Interestingly, the amount of CD44 in lipid rafts can vary in different cell types and can be displaced from these membrane domains upon E-cadherin expression, which negatively regulates HA–CD44 interactions and CD44-dependent tumor invasion and branching morphogenesis [75]. In immune cells, CD44 is directed into lipid rafts via palmitoylation, which impairs the CD3-mediated signaling [76]. The strong association between CD44 and the actin filament network causes CD44 to act like a transmembrane picket that connects the cytoskeleton to pericellular milieu, forming barriers against diffusion of molecules through the plasma membrane [77]. Furthermore, the specific location of ERM proteins determines their functions. For example, moesin can be released outside the cells, and intracellular/extracellular moesins can have opposing effects on pro-tumorigenic signaling [78]. In particular, in contrast to intracellular moesin, extracellular moesin exerts a tumor-suppressive effect by regulating cell adhesion through inhibition of Src and β-catenin signaling via its interaction with the CD44 extracellular domain and FN1.
Of particular interest is the cross-linking of CD44 receptors, which has been associated with the metastatic potential of several human cancers. Receptor aggregation can be drastically induced by both extracellular (pericellular HMW HA) and intracellular (phosphorylated moesin/ezrin) cues [79]. The association of CD44 with ezrin and actin promotes HA binding to cells [80,81]. Furthermore, it is likely that clustering of CD44 would enhance HA’s binding affinity compared to the weak affinity of single CD44 molecules to HA [82,83]. Therefore, CD44 homomerization as a result of its association with cytoskeletal ERMs (i.e., ezrin) could create tight connections with extracellular HA polymers. The resulting tight HA–CD44 complexes would allow free ends of HA to extend far from cell surface to expand the HA coat [54]. In addition, CD44 clustering on neutrophils and interactions with E-selectin on activated endothelial cells have been established as a prerequisite for neutrophil tethering and subsequent rolling arrest and emigration into perivascular tissues. This process seems to be enhanced by the interaction of CD44 ICD with ankyrin, since disruption of the ankyrin-binding site impaired HA–CD44-dependent rolling of neutrophils on E-selectin and CD44-mediated activation of Src kinases [84].
5. Regulation of Cell–Cell Contact Inhibition and Cell Growth
CD44-mediated contact inhibition of cell growth is modulated by counteracting CD44 ICD interacting proteins; e.g., the tumor suppressor protein merlin and ERM proteins. Their reversible dynamic association with CD44 ICD regulates the effects of the receptor on cell growth and motility since it provides an ON (CD44–ERM)/OFF (CD44–merlin) mechanism in the CD44–actin cytoskeleton association and signal transduction pathways (Figure 1). The importance of these interactions in cell physiology is evidenced by the finding that long-lived naked mole rats, which synthesize HA of exceptionally high molecular size, show a remarkable resistance to cancer through regulation of cell–cell contact inhibition via the HA–CD44–merlin signaling axis [85,86,87]. Mechanistically, ERM proteins and merlin are both hypophosphorylated in high-cell-density conditions [88]. Under these conditions, ERM proteins are inactive, while merlin adopts the active unphosphorylated closed conformation and interacts with HA-bound CD44 and E-cadherin, thus stabilizing the homophilic E-cadherin interactions and cell–cell adhesion complexes and rendering the cells stationary. Activated merlin prevents proteolytic processing of the CD44 extracellular domain, which in turn preserves cell density signaling and inhibits cell proliferation and migration [89]. Furthermore, dephosphorylated merlin suppresses Ras-mediated signaling [89]. Merlin also couples cell density with Hippo pathway components [90,91]. Involvement of the Hippo pathway in contact inhibition was evident from the observation that the overexpression of the YAP pro-oncogenic transcriptional coactivator, a Hippo signaling pathway component, antagonizes contact inhibition [92]. The interaction of merlin with the cytoplasmic domain of CD44 promotes the recruitment of LATS (a Hippo pathway core Ser/Thr kinase), thus stimulating Hippo signaling and contact inhibition [93]. Reduced cell density induces p21-activated kinase (PAK)-mediated phosphorylation of merlin, leading to its dissociation from CD44 ICD and release into the cytoplasm, thus abrogating the growth-suppressive actions of merlin [94,95]. On the other hand, phosphorylated active ERM proteins bound to F-actin are recruited to the ICD of CD44 isoforms containing v6 exon (for example, CD44v6), which act as co-receptors for the RTK Met, promoting hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-mediated activation of Ras and downstream signaling via the Erk MAP-kinase and PI3K/Akt pathways [96,97]. These observations imply a functional coordination of the CD44 stem region’s structural features with CD44 ICD to induce specific signaling pathways that drive cell growth and survival.
In addition to merlin, PAR1b (partitioning defective 1b) also links CD44 and the Hippo pathway [98]. Ooki and colleagues found that HMW–HA-mediated CD44 clustering induces the interaction of CD44 ICD with the PAR1b/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 2 (MARK2) complex, which normally inactivates MST1 and MST2 Ser/Thr kinases through binding and subsequent inhibitory phosphorylation, thus triggering Hippo signaling activation and contributing to contact inhibition of cell growth. In contrast, LMW HA competes with HMW HA for binding to CD44, thereby inhibiting HMW–HA–CD44-mediated PAR1b recruitment and subsequent Hippo signaling activation [98].
Our proteomic analysis revealed the in vitro interaction of the inhibitor of apoptosis-stimulating protein of p53 (iASPP) with the C-terminus of CD44 [40]. iASPP inhibits p53-mediated cell death by suppressing its transcriptional activity on the promoters of Bax and PIG3 [99,100]. iASPP belongs to the family of ASPP proteins and was originally described as an ReIA-associated inhibitor (RAI) that inhibits the transcriptional activity of the NF-kappaB subunit p65 [101,102]. We identified the ankyrin-binding domain of CD44 ICD as the primary site of CD44–iASPP interaction, which differed between normal and cancer cells [103]. The formation of iASPP–CD44 complexes was induced by HA stimulation, while iASPP was found to be important for HA-induced, CD44-dependent migration and adhesion of normal fibroblasts [103]. Importantly, in the absence of iASPP, CD44 interacted with p53 and triggered the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), suggesting an important role of CD44 in p53-mediated apoptosis. Considering the fact that p53 binds to the CD44 promoter via a non-canonical p53 consensus sequence and suppresses CD44 expression promoting cell apoptosis [104], our findings suggest that balanced CD44–iASPP and iASPP–p53 complexes may regulate cell survival. The regulation of these events seems to be complex and cell-context-dependent, since the knock-down of CD44 led to a loss in contact inhibition, most likely through the Hippo pathway, and CD44 expression suppressed cell growth in fibroblast cultures [103].
6. Cleavage and Intracellular Release of CD44 ICD: A Master Regulator of the Transcriptome
The proteolytic cleavage of the extracellular domain or shedding of membrane-associated proteins is an irreversible post-translational modification that regulates cell–cell communication, intercellular signaling, and biological functions by releasing growth factors, enzymes, and soluble receptors [105]. In some instances, the remaining protein in the membrane is further cleaved, generating additional products that include a cytoplasmic fragment that can function in intracellular signaling, revealing an additional level of regulation of cellular functions. In line with this, CD44 can undergo successive proteolytic processing by a number of proteases, resulting in the generation of both extra- and intracellular bioactive fragments. These proteases are recruited and act at the cleavage site under specific prerequisites. The formation of CD44 dimers has been suggested to be critical [106]. Others include the phosphorylation status of specific Ser residues within ICD, since dephosphorylation of CD44 at the membrane proximal Ser291 was found to be essential for its ectodomain cleavage mediated by PKC [107], while selective binding of different cytoplasmic partners to ICD also affects this process. For example, binding of CD44 ICD to merlin reduces, whereas its interaction with ERM proteins (such as radixin) triggers CD44 shedding [106,108,109]. CD44 cleavage is induced by stimulation with several growth factors and cytokines as well with fragmented HA to activate a plethora of signaling pathways, including Ras, PKC, Rac1, and extracellular Ca2+ influx [110].
The sequential cleavage of CD44 begins with the ectodomain shedding by transmembrane MMPs (i.e., MT1-MMP and MT3-MMP) as well as other CD44 sheddases (i.e., disintegrin or ADAM 10, ADAM 17, and meprin β), resulting in the generation of a membrane-associated fragment of CD44 while its extracellular N-terminal region is released to the ECM [5,111]. ERM proteins are involved in CD44 shedding, since they mediate the colocalization of MT1-MMP and CD44. In particular, the radixin FERM domain simultaneously binds the cytoplasmic tails of MT1-MMP and CD44, forming a complex that is stabilized through anchoring to filamentous actin. This ternary complex facilitates the recognition of the CD44 stem region by the PEX domain of the MT1-MMP ectodomain, resulting in CD44 shedding [108,109] (Figure 2). More recently, the involvement of ubiquitin ligase tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 4/6 in CD44 cleavage was demonstrated [112]. TRAF4/6 induces small GTPase Rac1-mediated activation of MMPs, enhancing CD44 ectodomain shedding and thus promoting the pro-tumorigenic effects of CD44 (Figure 2). It has been suggested that this is a cell-type-dependent process, since the relative expression levels of TRAF4 and TRAF6 in different cell types determine which of these two structural related TRAF isoforms mediates CD44 cleavage [112].
Shedding of the CD44 ectodomain triggers the subsequent intramembranous cleavage of the membrane-associated fragment via regulated intramembranous proteolysis (RIP) catalyzed by presenilin-1-dependent gamma-secretase activity, resulting in the release of a CD44β-like peptide in the ECM and the generation of a CD44 ICD fragment within the cytoplasm [113,114]. CD44 ICD can then function as an intracellular cargo of proteins already bound to the receptor, interact with additional cytoplasmic proteins as a result of its altered location, or translocate to the nucleus, where it functions as a master regulator of the transcriptome (Figure 2). The released ICD fragment contains a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) that enables ICD to be imported to the nucleus through the nuclear pore complex. The NLS is identical to that of the FERM-binding domain of CD44 ICD, which consists of two clusters of basic amino acids (292RRRCGQKKK300) [115] (Figure 1). Upon its translocation to the nucleus, the ICD acts as a transcription factor through binding to consensus sequences such as the 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA)-response element or CCTGCG found in the promoter regions of MMP-9, HIF-1 αlpha genes as well as genes involved in cell metabolic pathways (see below) [116]. Of particular interest is the ability of CD44 ICD to induce the expression of full-length CD44 via a positive feedback loop through binding to the CBP/p300 transcriptional activator [110] (Figure 2). Other transcriptional activities of CD44 ICD that contribute to its oncogenic properties include its interaction with the CREB transcriptional factor, which induces CREB phosphorylation and binding to the promoter of cyclin D1, resulting in increased cyclin D1 expression and sustained cell cycle progression [117] (Figure 2). Moreover, CD44 ICD endows tumor cells with stemness and chemo/radio-resistance properties. Johansson and colleagues showed that CD44 ICD is released at hypoxia, interacts with HIF-2 alpha, enhances HIF target gene expression, and is required for hypoxia-induced stemness of perinecrotic and perivascular glioma cells [118]. Bourguignon and colleagues have demonstrated the interaction of CD44 ICD with Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog stem cell transcriptional factors that support self-renewal, clonal formation, and therapeutic resistance [119]. The nuclear translocation of the ICD–Oct4–Sox2–Nanog complex promotes their coordinated recruitment and binding to response elements in the promoter of target genes, thus enhancing their transcriptional activity and the acquisition of stem cell properties [120] (Figure 2).
7. Regulation of Cell Metabolism
One of the proteins that were identified by our proteomic approach to interact with the C-terminus of CD44 was the M2 splice isoform of pyruvate kinase (PKM2), a glycolytic enzyme that catalyzes the generation of pyruvate and ATP from phosphoenolpyruvate and ADP [40]. While this finding was considered to possibly be non-specific since PKM2 is an abundant protein that is often detected in biotin-based pull-down experiments, two years later, Tamada and colleagues confirmed the interaction of CD44 with PKM2 [121]. This finding suggested a role of CD44 in cancer cell metabolism, since PKM2 is a key enzyme that regulates aerobic glycolysis or the Warburg effect, a metabolic pathway utilized by tumor cells regardless of the local availability of molecular oxygen to produce energy (ATP) and promote tumor growth [122]. The low or high enzymatic activity of the PKM2 isoform dictates the conversion of pyruvate to lactate, which leads to the Warburg effect or to acetyl-CoA for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, respectively [122,123,124,125]. Interestingly, the interaction of CD44 with PKM2 reduces the enzymatic activity of PKM2 via tyrosine phosphorylation by RTKs, which triggers glycolysis and the flux to the pentose phosphate pathway, a major source of NADPH (Figure 2). This mainly occurs in hypoxic or p53-mutated glycolytic cancer cells, since p53 is known to positively regulating mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation through cytochrome c oxidase 2 induction [121,126]. Knock-down of CD44 enhanced oxidative phosphorylation, which led to GLUT1 suppression and a subsequent reduction in glucose uptake and pentose phosphate pathway flux. These changes resulted in reduced NADPH production, down-regulation of reduced glutathione (GSH) synthesis, and increased accumulation of ROS [121]. Moreover, other studies have shown that oxidative stress induces the oxidation of Cys358 in PKM2, which reduces PKM2 activity, promoting glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway flux that results in the production of NADPH, GSH, and subsequent ROS depletion [127,128,129]. In line with these observations, CD44 regulates the activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) that catalyzes the bidirectional conversion of pyruvate to lactate by modulating the ratio of LDHA and LDHB isoenzymes (Figure 2). In particular, ablation of CD44 lowered the LDHA-to-LDHB ratio, promoting mitochondrial respiration, while overexpression of CD44 increased the LDHA-to-LDHB ratio, enhancing lactate glycolysis and the Warburg effect in tumor cells [130]. It has been suggested that CD44 regulates the LDHA-to-LDHB ratio through the AMPKα/mTOR and HIF-1α signaling pathways [121,130,131]. These findings establish a key role for CD44 ICD in dictating the metabolic shift between mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and lactate glycolysis in tumor cells. These events provide tumor cells and likely CSCs with survival advantages while enabling them to bypass the cytotoxic effects of ROS and acquire therapeutic resistance properties.
Further, CD44 ICD enhanced aerobic glycolysis through induction of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphate 4 (PFKFB4), a key enzyme that catalyzes 6-phosphofructose (F6P) to fructose-2,6-biphosphate (F-2,6-BP) via bidirectional conversion during glycolysis [116,132]. Given that PFKFB4 regulates the levels of F-2,6-BP, which is a potent allosteric activator of phosphofructokinase 1 (PFK1), a critical regulatory enzyme of the glycolytic pathway [133], CD44 ICD may be considered as a powerful modulator of glycolysis. It is suggested that CD44 ICD regulates PFKFB4 transcription through interaction with CREB that binds to the PFKFB4 promoter region (Figure 2). The resultant PFKFB4 promotes cancer cell stemness properties via up-regulation of aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells [132].
Additional important CD44 ICD-induced genes encoding enzymes involved in aerobic glycolysis include ALDOC (which encodes aldolase c, fructose biphosphate), and PDK1 (which encodes pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-1) [116], highlighting CD44 as a gatekeeper of the Warburg effect (Figure 2). ALDOC is a key enzyme of glycolysis and gluconeogenesis that catalyzes the reversible conversion of fructose-1,6-biphosphate to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate, thus playing a crucial role in both ATP and glucose biosynthesis. PDK1 inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase, which converts pyruvate to acetyl-CoA, thus forcing glycolysis to convert pyruvate into lactate rather than going into the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. The excessive production of lactate results in the generation of an acidified microenvironment that enables cells to degrade and invade the ECM, while NAD+ is regenerated to allow continued glycolysis [134] (Figure 2).
Other studies have provided data that link the cytoskeletal association of CD44 with systematic metabolic homeostasis. Specific deletion of ROCK1, a downstream kinase of the CD44/ankyrin/Cdc42 signaling pathway, attenuated obesity-associated insulin resistance in adipose tissue, indicating a role in obesity-related metabolic syndromes [135]. Moreover, p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1), an additional downstream effector of the CD44/ankyrin pathway, is required for proper mitochondrial function and maintenance of cellular redox balance to prevent beta cell apoptosis, while it is involved in beta cell mass expansion and survival in islets of mice and humans during diet [136,137]. Interestingly, CD44–ERM interactions may regulate insulin secretion, since ERM-induced cytoskeleton rearrangement leads to glucose-stimulated insulin granule trafficking and secretion [138].
8. Conclusions
The CD44 tail has many more functions that (in the interest of space) are not discussed in the present review but are described in other excellent articles [4,5,139,140,141,142,143]. For example, CD44 is able to coordinate signaling responses, since many intracellular signaling molecules interact with CD44 ICD, including Rho-family GTPases and members of the Src family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases, which in turn activate PI3 kinase/Akt signaling [4,140]. However, there is still debate about the nature of these interactions and whether these are direct or indirect and are promoted by their co-localization in specialized cellular membranes and organelles. Notably, there is evidence to suggest that CD44v6/Met-driven signals may be generated within endosomal compartments, and internalization mechanisms have been identified [143]. The direct role of CD44 ICD in the co-receptor actions of CD44 has been established; for example, the FERM-binding domain is required for the scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor (SF/HGF) to activate RTK Met downstream signaling [96].
Moreover, CD44 ICD may have roles during viral and/or bacterial infections. For example, CD44–ezrin interactions are involved in the internalization process of Coxiella burnetii, the etiologic agent of Q fever, in non-phagocytic cells [144]. The aberrant expression of CD44 together with the increased amount of HA triggered by the dengue virus predicted an increased risk of developing warning signs and thus severe dengue virus infection, resulting in perturbed vascular integrity and increased vascular leakage [145]. However, further studies are required to determine the exact role of CD44 ICD in viral/bacterial infections in vivo.
In conclusion, the association of CD44 ICD with cytoskeletal effectors (ERM, merlin, IQGAP1, and ankyrin) drives cytoskeleton rearrangements and affects the distribution of organelles and transport of molecules. In addition, through specific interactions of its cytoplasmic tail, CD44 regulates the cell-trafficking machinery, the transcriptome, and major cell metabolic pathways, with substantial impact on cell functional properties like survival, proliferation, adhesion, differentiation, therapeutic resistance, stemness properties, and EMT (summarized in Table 1). This long tale of the short tail of CD44 is still expanding, and it seems that we are still at the tip of the iceberg.
Table 1.
Cellular Pathway | Cellular Function | CD44 ICD Interaction(s) | Ref(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Cell trafficking | HA endocytosis, pericellular matrix retention, and organization |
Absence of ICD | [36] |
CD44–HA endocytosis and degradation | MARCH-VIII ubiquitin ligase |
[37] | |
CD44 endocytic recycling and stabilization, stemness, and EMT | Hook1, EHD1, and EHD2 | [39,40,42] | |
Sustained EGFR signaling and survival | Rab7A | [44] | |
Cytoskeletal organization | Growth, anchorage-independent growth, migration, adhesion, chemotaxis, and leukocyte binding |
ERM, merlin, and ankyrin | [4,30,31,52,53,54,55,56,57,60,69,97] |
Migration and proliferation | IQGAP1 | [40,67,68] | |
Contact inhibition of growth, migration, apoptosis, and proliferation |
Merlin | [85,86,87,89,90,91,93] | |
Contact inhibition of growth | PAR1b | [98] | |
Transcription | Apoptosis, survival, migration, and adhesion |
iASPP | [40,103] |
CD44 expression | CBP/p300 transcriptional activator |
[110] | |
Cell cycle progression | CREB | [117] | |
Stemness and therapeutic resistance |
HIF-2 alpha | [118] | |
Stemness and therapeutic resistance |
Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog | [119,120] | |
Metabolism | Survival, stemness, and therapeutic resistance |
LDH, PFKFB4, ALDOC, and PDK1 | [116,130,132] |
Survival and therapeutic resistance |
PKM2 | [40,121] |
Acknowledgments
The author wish to thank Evi Heldin (Uppsala University, Sweden) and Dimitrios Theocharis (University of Patras, Greece) for the introduction to and guidance in the exciting hyaluronan–CD44 field and for the constructive criticism of the present review.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Screaton G.R., Bell M.V., Jackson D.G., Cornelis F.B., Gerth U., Bell J.I. Genomic structure of DNA encoding the lymphocyte homing receptor CD44 reveals at least 12 alternatively spliced exons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:12160–12164. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.12160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goldstein L.A., Zhou D.F., Picker L.J., Minty C.N., Bargatze R.F., Ding J.F., Butcher E.C. A human lymphocyte homing receptor, the hermes antigen, is related to cartilage proteoglycan core and link proteins. Cell. 1989;56:1063–1072. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90639-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Isacke C.M. The role of the cytoplasmic domain in regulating CD44 function. Pt 9J. Cell Sci. 1994;107:2353–2359. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.9.2353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thorne R.F., Legg J.W., Isacke C.M. The role of the CD44 transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains in co-ordinating adhesive and signalling events. J. Cell Sci. 2004;117:373–380. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heldin P., Kolliopoulos C., Lin C.Y., Heldin C.H. Involvement of hyaluronan and CD44 in cancer and viral infections. Cell Signal. 2020;65:109427. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.109427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kincade P.W., Zheng Z., Katoh S., Hanson L. The importance of cellular environment to function of the CD44 matrix receptor. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1997;9:635–642. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80116-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Morath I., Hartmann T.N., Orian-Rousseau V. CD44: More than a mere stem cell marker. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2016;81:166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Elkashty O.A., Elghanam G.A., Su X., Liu Y., Chauvin P.J., Tran S.D. Cancer stem cells enrichment with surface markers CD271 and CD44 in human head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Carcinogenesis. 2020;41:458–466. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgz182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tsunekuni K., Konno M., Haraguchi N., Koseki J., Asai A., Matsuoka K., Kobunai T., Takechi T., Doki Y., Mori M., et al. CD44/CD133-Positive Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells are Sensitive to Trifluridine Exposure. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:14861. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50968-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mani S.A., Guo W., Liao M.J., Eaton E.N., Ayyanan A., Zhou A.Y., Brooks M., Reinhard F., Zhang C.C., Shipitsin M., et al. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 2008;133:704–715. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li J., Zhou B.P. Activation of beta-catenin and Akt pathways by Twist are critical for the maintenance of EMT associated cancer stem cell-like characters. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Skandalis S.S., Karalis T.T., Chatzopoulos A., Karamanos N.K. Hyaluronan-CD44 axis orchestrates cancer stem cell functions. Cell Signal. 2019;63:109377. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.109377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lesley J., He Q., Miyake K., Hamann A., Hyman R., Kincade P.W. Requirements for hyaluronic acid binding by CD44: A role for the cytoplasmic domain and activation by antibody. J. Exp. Med. 1992;175:257–266. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.1.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Neame S.J., Isacke C.M. The cytoplasmic tail of CD44 is required for basolateral localization in epithelial MDCK cells but does not mediate association with the detergent-insoluble cytoskeleton of fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 1993;121:1299–1310. doi: 10.1083/jcb.121.6.1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Uff C.R., Neame S.J., Isacke C.M. Hyaluronan binding by CD44 is regulated by a phosphorylation-independent mechanism. Eur. J. Immunol. 1995;25:1883–1887. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lokeshwar V.B., Fregien N., Bourguignon L.Y. Ankyrin-binding domain of CD44(GP85) is required for the expression of hyaluronic acid-mediated adhesion function. J. Cell Biol. 1994;126:1099–1109. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.4.1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thomas L., Byers H.R., Vink J., Stamenkovic I. CD44H regulates tumor cell migration on hyaluronate-coated substrate. J. Cell Biol. 1992;118:971–977. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.4.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gal I., Lesley J., Ko W., Gonda A., Stoop R., Hyman R., Mikecz K. Role of the extracellular and cytoplasmic domains of CD44 in the rolling interaction of lymphoid cells with hyaluronan under physiologic flow. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:11150–11158. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210661200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Legg J.W., Isacke C.M. Identification and functional analysis of the ezrin-binding site in the hyaluronan receptor, CD44. Curr Biol. 1998;8:705–708. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70277-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yonemura S., Hirao M., Doi Y., Takahashi N., Kondo T., Tsukita S., Tsukita S. Ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins bind to a positively charged amino acid cluster in the juxta-membrane cytoplasmic domain of CD44, CD43, and ICAM-2. J. Cell Biol. 1998;140:885–895. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.4.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sheikh H., Isacke C.M. A di-hydrophobic Leu-Val motif regulates the basolateral localization of CD44 in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:12185–12190. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.21.12185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Neame S.J., Isacke C.M. Phosphorylation of CD44 in vivo requires both Ser323 and Ser325, but does not regulate membrane localization or cytoskeletal interaction in epithelial cells. EMBO J. 1992;11:4733–4738. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05578.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lewis C.A., Townsend P.A., Isacke C.M. Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase mediates the phosphorylation of CD44 required for cell migration on hyaluronan. Biochem. J. 2001;357:843–850. doi: 10.1042/bj3570843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Peck D., Isacke C.M. Hyaluronan-dependent cell migration can be blocked by a CD44 cytoplasmic domain peptide containing a phosphoserine at position 325. Pt 11J. Cell Sci. 1998;111:1595–1601. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.11.1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Peck D., Isacke C.M. CD44 phosphorylation regulates melanoma cell and fibroblast migration on, but not attachment to, a hyaluronan substratum. Curr. Biol. 1996;6:884–890. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00612-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Galandrini R., De Maria R., Piccoli M., Frati L., Santoni A. CD44 triggering enhances human NK cell cytotoxic functions. J. Immunol. 1994;153:4399–4407. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.153.10.4399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bourguignon L.Y., Lokeshwar V.B., Chen X., Kerrick W.G. Hyaluronic acid-induced lymphocyte signal transduction and HA receptor (GP85/CD44)-cytoskeleton interaction. J. Immunol. 1993;151:6634–6644. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.151.12.6634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Racine R.R., Manalo N.A., Hall J.M.F., Dibas A., Raffel G.D., Mummert M.E. CD44 induced enhancement of phosphatase activity and calcium influx: Modifications of EGR-1 expression and cell proliferation. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2016;6:172–178. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2016.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Meyer T., Hanson P.I., Stryer L., Schulman H. Calmodulin trapping by calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. Science. 1992;256:1199–1202. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5060.1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Legg J.W., Lewis C.A., Parsons M., Ng T., Isacke C.M. A novel PKC-regulated mechanism controls CD44 ezrin association and directional cell motility. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002;4:399–407. doi: 10.1038/ncb797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tzircotis G., Thorne R.F., Isacke C.M. Directional sensing of a phorbol ester gradient requires CD44 and is regulated by CD44 phosphorylation. Oncogene. 2006;25:7401–7410. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Heilker R., Spiess M., Crottet P. Recognition of sorting signals by clathrin adaptors. Bioessays. 1999;21:558–567. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199907)21:7<558::AID-BIES4>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tammi R., Rilla K., Pienimaki J.P., MacCallum D.K., Hogg M., Luukkonen M., Hascall V.C., Tammi M. Hyaluronan enters keratinocytes by a novel endocytic route for catabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:35111–35122. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103481200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Knudson W., Chow G., Knudson C.B. CD44-mediated uptake and degradation of hyaluronan. Matrix Biol. 2002;21:15–23. doi: 10.1016/S0945-053X(01)00186-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thankamony S.P., Knudson W. Acylation of CD44 and its association with lipid rafts are required for receptor and hyaluronan endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:34601–34609. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601530200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aguiar D.J., Knudson W., Knudson C.B. Internalization of the hyaluronan receptor CD44 by chondrocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 1999;252:292–302. doi: 10.1006/excr.1999.4641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Eyster C.A., Cole N.B., Petersen S., Viswanathan K., Fruh K., Donaldson J.G. MARCH ubiquitin ligases alter the itinerary of clathrin-independent cargo from recycling to degradation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2011;22:3218–3230. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e10-11-0874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Skandalis S.S., Karalis T., Heldin P. Intracellular hyaluronan: Importance for cellular functions. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;62:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Maldonado-Baez L., Donaldson J.G. Hook1, microtubules, and Rab22: Mediators of selective sorting of clathrin-independent endocytic cargo proteins on endosomes. Bioarchitecture. 2013;3:141–146. doi: 10.4161/bioa.26638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Skandalis S.S., Kozlova I., Engstrom U., Hellman U., Heldin P. Proteomic identification of CD44 interacting proteins. IUBMB Life. 2010;62:833–840. doi: 10.1002/iub.392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Murai T. Lipid Raft-Mediated Regulation of Hyaluronan-CD44 Interactions in Inflammation and Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2015;6:420. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu Y., Song Y., Cao M., Fan W., Cui Y., Cui Y., Zhan Y., Gu R., Tian F., Zhang S., et al. A novel EHD1/CD44/Hippo/SP1 positive feedback loop potentiates stemness and metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. Clin. Transl. Med. 2022;12:e836. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Naslavsky N., Caplan S. EHD proteins: Key conductors of endocytic transport. Trends Cell Biol. 2011;21:122–131. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang W., Zhang H., Liu S., Kim C.K., Xu Y., Hurley L.A., Nishikawa R., Nagane M., Hu B., Stegh A.H., et al. Internalized CD44s splice isoform attenuates EGFR degradation by targeting Rab7A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:8366–8371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701289114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Heiska L., Alfthan K., Gronholm M., Vilja P., Vaheri A., Carpen O. Association of ezrin with intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and -2 (ICAM-1 and ICAM-2). Regulation by phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:21893–21900. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.34.21893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Granes F., Urena J.M., Rocamora N., Vilaro S. Ezrin links syndecan-2 to the cytoskeleton. Pt 7J. Cell Sci. 2000;113:1267–1276. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.7.1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ivetic A., Deka J., Ridley A., Ager A. The cytoplasmic tail of L-selectin interacts with members of the Ezrin-Radixin-Moesin (ERM) family of proteins: Cell activation-dependent binding of Moesin but not Ezrin. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:2321–2329. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109460200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Obremski V.J., Hall A.M., Fernandez-Valle C. Merlin, the neurofibromatosis type 2 gene product, and beta1 integrin associate in isolated and differentiating Schwann cells. J Neurobiol. 1998;37:487–501. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199812)37:4<487::AID-NEU1>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Curto M., McClatchey A.I. Nf2/Merlin: A coordinator of receptor signalling and intercellular contact. Br. J. Cancer. 2008;98:256–262. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sato T., Sekido Y. NF2/Merlin Inactivation and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Mesothelioma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:988. doi: 10.3390/ijms19040988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mranda G.M., Xiang Z.P., Liu J.J., Wei T., Ding Y. Advances in prognostic and therapeutic targets for hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: The hippo signaling pathway. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:937957. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.937957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ren M., Zhao L., Ma Z., An H., Marrink S.J., Sun F. Molecular basis of PIP2-dependent conformational switching of phosphorylated CD44 in binding FERM. Biophys. J. 2023;122:2675–2685. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bretscher A., Edwards K., Fehon R.G. ERM proteins and merlin: Integrators at the cell cortex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:586–599. doi: 10.1038/nrm882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jokela T., Oikari S., Takabe P., Rilla K., Karna R., Tammi M., Tammi R. Interleukin-1beta-induced Reduction of CD44 Ser-325 Phosphorylation in Human Epidermal Keratinocytes Promotes CD44 Homomeric Complexes, Binding to Ezrin, and Extended, Monocyte-adhesive Hyaluronan Coats. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:12379–12393. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.620864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nunomura W., Takakuwa Y., Tokimitsu R., Krauss S.W., Kawashima M., Mohandas N. Regulation of CD44-protein 4.1 interaction by Ca2+ and calmodulin. Implications for modulation of CD44-ankyrin interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:30322–30328. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.48.30322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Donatello S., Babina I.S., Hazelwood L.D., Hill A.D., Nabi I.R., Hopkins A.M. Lipid raft association restricts CD44-ezrin interaction and promotion of breast cancer cell migration. Am. J. Pathol. 2012;181:2172–2187. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.08.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sherman L., Xu H.M., Geist R.T., Saporito-Irwin S., Howells N., Ponta H., Herrlich P., Gutmann D.H. Interdomain binding mediates tumor growth suppression by the NF2 gene product. Oncogene. 1997;15:2505–2509. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tang X., Jang S.W., Wang X., Liu Z., Bahr S.M., Sun S.Y., Brat D., Gutmann D.H., Ye K. Akt phosphorylation regulates the tumour-suppressor merlin through ubiquitination and degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:1199–1207. doi: 10.1038/ncb1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Thaxton C., Lopera J., Bott M., Fernandez-Valle C. Neuregulin and laminin stimulate phosphorylation of the NF2 tumor suppressor in Schwann cells by distinct protein kinase A and p21-activated kinase-dependent pathways. Oncogene. 2008;27:2705–2715. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ng T., Parsons M., Hughes W.E., Monypenny J., Zicha D., Gautreau A., Arpin M., Gschmeissner S., Verveer P.J., Bastiaens P.I., et al. Ezrin is a downstream effector of trafficking PKC-integrin complexes involved in the control of cell motility. EMBO J. 2001;20:2723–2741. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.11.2723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Choi Y., Yun J.H., Yoo J., Lee I., Kim H., Son H.N., Kim I.S., Yoon H.S., Zimmermann P., Couchman J.R., et al. New structural insight of C-terminal region of Syntenin-1, enhancing the molecular dimerization and inhibitory function related on Syndecan-4 signaling. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:36818. doi: 10.1038/srep36818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Iuliano R., Trapasso F., Sama I., Le Pera I., Martelli M.L., Lembo F., Santoro M., Viglietto G., Chiariotti L., Fusco A. Rat protein tyrosine phosphatase eta physically interacts with the PDZ domains of syntenin. FEBS Lett. 2001;500:41–44. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02580-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bass M.D., Humphries M.J. Cytoplasmic interactions of syndecan-4 orchestrate adhesion receptor and growth factor receptor signalling. Biochem. J. 2002;368:1–15. doi: 10.1042/bj20021228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Briggs M.W., Sacks D.B. IQGAP proteins are integral components of cytoskeletal regulation. EMBO Rep. 2003;4:571–574. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Noritake J., Watanabe T., Sato K., Wang S., Kaibuchi K. IQGAP1: A key regulator of adhesion and migration. J. Cell Sci. 2005;118:2085–2092. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Brown M.D., Sacks D.B. IQGAP1 in cellular signaling: Bridging the GAP. Trends Cell Biol. 2006;16:242–249. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kozlova I., Ruusala A., Voytyuk O., Skandalis S.S., Heldin P. IQGAP1 regulates hyaluronan-mediated fibroblast motility and proliferation. Cell Signal. 2012;24:1856–1862. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bourguignon L.Y., Gilad E., Rothman K., Peyrollier K. Hyaluronan-CD44 interaction with IQGAP1 promotes Cdc42 and ERK signaling, leading to actin binding, Elk-1/estrogen receptor transcriptional activation, and ovarian cancer progression. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:11961–11972. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411985200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bourguignon L.Y., Zhu H., Shao L., Zhu D., Chen Y.W. Rho-kinase (ROK) promotes CD44v(3,8-10)-ankyrin interaction and tumor cell migration in metastatic breast cancer cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 1999;43:269–287. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1999)43:4<269::AID-CM1>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Oliferenko S., Paiha K., Harder T., Gerke V., Schwarzler C., Schwarz H., Beug H., Gunthert U., Huber L.A. Analysis of CD44-containing lipid rafts: Recruitment of annexin II and stabilization by the actin cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 1999;146:843–854. doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.4.843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bourguignon L.Y., Singleton P.A., Diedrich F., Stern R., Gilad E. CD44 interaction with Na+-H+ exchanger (NHE1) creates acidic microenvironments leading to hyaluronidase-2 and cathepsin B activation and breast tumor cell invasion. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:26991–27007. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311838200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Triantafilou M., Miyake K., Golenbock D.T., Triantafilou K. Mediators of innate immune recognition of bacteria concentrate in lipid rafts and facilitate lipopolysaccharide-induced cell activation. J. Cell Sci. 2002;115:2603–2611. doi: 10.1242/jcs.115.12.2603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Grass G.D., Dai L., Qin Z., Parsons C., Toole B.P. CD147: Regulator of hyaluronan signaling in invasiveness and chemoresistance. Adv. Cancer Res. 2014;123:351–373. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800092-2.00013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wu A., Wojtowicz K., Savary S., Hamon Y., Trombik T. Do ABC transporters regulate plasma membrane organization? Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2020;25:37. doi: 10.1186/s11658-020-00224-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Xu Y., Yu Q. E-cadherin negatively regulates CD44-hyaluronan interaction and CD44-mediated tumor invasion and branching morphogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:8661–8668. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208181200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Guo Y.J., Lin S.C., Wang J.H., Bigby M., Sy M.S. Palmitoylation of CD44 interferes with CD3-mediated signaling in human T lymphocytes. Int. Immunol. 1994;6:213–221. doi: 10.1093/intimm/6.2.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Freeman S.A., Vega A., Riedl M., Collins R.F., Ostrowski P.P., Woods E.C., Bertozzi C.R., Tammi M.I., Lidke D.S., Johnson P., et al. Transmembrane Pickets Connect Cyto- and Pericellular Skeletons Forming Barriers to Receptor Engagement. Cell. 2018;172:305–317.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ahandoust S., Li K., Sun X., Li B.Y., Yokota H., Na S. Intracellular and extracellular moesins differentially regulate Src activity and beta-catenin translocation to the nucleus in breast cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2023;639:62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.11.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hu S., Shi X., Liu Y., He Y., Du Y., Zhang G., Yang C., Gao F. CD44 cross-linking increases malignancy of breast cancer via upregulation of p-Moesin. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:563. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01663-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Brown K.L., Birkenhead D., Lai J.C., Li L., Li R., Johnson P. Regulation of hyaluronan binding by F-actin and colocalization of CD44 and phosphorylated ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins in myeloid cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2005;303:400–414. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Liu D., Liu T., Sy M.S. Identification of two regions in the cytoplasmic domain of CD44 through which PMA, calcium, and foskolin differentially regulate the binding of CD44 to hyaluronic acid. Cell Immunol. 1998;190:132–140. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1998.1397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lesley J., Hascall V.C., Tammi M., Hyman R. Hyaluronan binding by cell surface CD44. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:26967–26975. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)61467-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Sleeman J., Rudy W., Hofmann M., Moll J., Herrlich P., Ponta H. Regulated clustering of variant CD44 proteins increases their hyaluronate binding capacity. J. Cell Biol. 1996;135:1139–1150. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.4.1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wang Y., Yago T., Zhang N., Abdisalaam S., Alexandrakis G., Rodgers W., McEver R.P. Cytoskeletal regulation of CD44 membrane organization and interactions with E-selectin. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:35159–35171. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.600767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Seluanov A., Hine C., Azpurua J., Feigenson M., Bozzella M., Mao Z., Catania K.C., Gorbunova V. Hypersensitivity to contact inhibition provides a clue to cancer resistance of naked mole-rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:19352–19357. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905252106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tian X., Azpurua J., Hine C., Vaidya A., Myakishev-Rempel M., Ablaeva J., Mao Z., Nevo E., Gorbunova V., Seluanov A. High-molecular-mass hyaluronan mediates the cancer resistance of the naked mole rat. Nature. 2013;499:346–349. doi: 10.1038/nature12234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Morrison H., Sherman L.S., Legg J., Banine F., Isacke C., Haipek C.A., Gutmann D.H., Ponta H., Herrlich P. The NF2 tumor suppressor gene product, merlin, mediates contact inhibition of growth through interactions with CD44. Genes Dev. 2001;15:968–980. doi: 10.1101/gad.189601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Jin H., Sperka T., Herrlich P., Morrison H. Tumorigenic transformation by CPI-17 through inhibition of a merlin phosphatase. Nature. 2006;442:576–579. doi: 10.1038/nature04856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Hartmann M., Parra L.M., Ruschel A., Bohme S., Li Y., Morrison H., Herrlich A., Herrlich P. Tumor Suppressor NF2 Blocks Cellular Migration by Inhibiting Ectodomain Cleavage of CD44. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015;13:879–890. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0020-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hamaratoglu F., Willecke M., Kango-Singh M., Nolo R., Hyun E., Tao C., Jafar-Nejad H., Halder G. The tumour-suppressor genes NF2/Merlin and Expanded act through Hippo signalling to regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006;8:27–36. doi: 10.1038/ncb1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zhang N., Bai H., David K.K., Dong J., Zheng Y., Cai J., Giovannini M., Liu P., Anders R.A., Pan D. The Merlin/NF2 tumor suppressor functions through the YAP oncoprotein to regulate tissue homeostasis in mammals. Dev. Cell. 2010;19:27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Gumbiner B.M., Kim N.G. The Hippo-YAP signaling pathway and contact inhibition of growth. J. Cell Sci. 2014;127:709–717. doi: 10.1242/jcs.140103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Yin F., Yu J., Zheng Y., Chen Q., Zhang N., Pan D. Spatial organization of Hippo signaling at the plasma membrane mediated by the tumor suppressor Merlin/NF2. Cell. 2013;154:1342–1355. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kissil J.L., Johnson K.C., Eckman M.S., Jacks T. Merlin phosphorylation by p21-activated kinase 2 and effects of phosphorylation on merlin localization. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:10394–10399. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200083200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Surace E.I., Haipek C.A., Gutmann D.H. Effect of merlin phosphorylation on neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) gene function. Oncogene. 2004;23:580–587. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Orian-Rousseau V., Chen L., Sleeman J.P., Herrlich P., Ponta H. CD44 is required for two consecutive steps in HGF/c-Met signaling. Genes Dev. 2002;16:3074–3086. doi: 10.1101/gad.242602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Orian-Rousseau V., Morrison H., Matzke A., Kastilan T., Pace G., Herrlich P., Ponta H. Hepatocyte growth factor-induced Ras activation requires ERM proteins linked to both CD44v6 and F-actin. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2007;18:76–83. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-08-0674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ooki T., Murata-Kamiya N., Takahashi-Kanemitsu A., Wu W., Hatakeyama M. High-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronan Is a Hippo Pathway Ligand Directing Cell Density-Dependent Growth Inhibition via PAR1b. Dev. Cell. 2019;49:590–604.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Bergamaschi D., Samuels Y., O’Neil N.J., Trigiante G., Crook T., Hsieh J.K., O’Connor D.J., Zhong S., Campargue I., Tomlinson M.L., et al. iASPP oncoprotein is a key inhibitor of p53 conserved from worm to human. Nat. Genet. 2003;33:162–167. doi: 10.1038/ng1070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Sullivan A., Lu X. ASPP: A new family of oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes. Br. J. Cancer. 2007;96:196–200. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Yang J.P., Hori M., Sanda T., Okamoto T. Identification of a novel inhibitor of nuclear factor-kappaB, RelA-associated inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:15662–15670. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.22.15662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Trigiante G., Lu X. ASPP [corrected] and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2006;6:217–226. doi: 10.1038/nrc1818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Lin C.Y., Basu K., Ruusala A., Kozlova I., Li Y.S., Skandalis S.S., Heldin C.H., Heldin P. Hyaluronan-Induced CD44-iASPP Interaction Affects Fibroblast Migration and Survival. Cancers. 2023;15:1082. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Godar S., Ince T.A., Bell G.W., Feldser D., Donaher J.L., Bergh J., Liu A., Miu K., Watnick R.S., Reinhardt F., et al. Growth-inhibitory and tumor- suppressive functions of p53 depend on its repression of CD44 expression. Cell. 2008;134:62–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lichtenthaler S.F., Lemberg M.K., Fluhrer R. Proteolytic ectodomain shedding of membrane proteins in mammals-hardware, concepts, and recent developments. EMBO J. 2018;37:e99456. doi: 10.15252/embj.201899456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Hartmann M., Parra L.M., Ruschel A., Lindner C., Morrison H., Herrlich A., Herrlich P. Inside-out Regulation of Ectodomain Cleavage of Cluster-of-Differentiation-44 (CD44) and of Neuregulin-1 Requires Substrate Dimerization. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:17041–17054. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.610204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Parra L.M., Hartmann M., Schubach S., Li Y., Herrlich P., Herrlich A. Distinct Intracellular Domain Substrate Modifications Selectively Regulate Ectodomain Cleavage of NRG1 or CD44. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015;35:3381–3395. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00500-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Suenaga N., Mori H., Itoh Y., Seiki M. CD44 binding through the hemopexin-like domain is critical for its shedding by membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase. Oncogene. 2005;24:859–868. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Terawaki S., Kitano K., Aoyama M., Mori T., Hakoshima T. MT1-MMP recognition by ERM proteins and its implication in CD44 shedding. Genes Cells. 2015;20:847–859. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Okamoto I., Tsuiki H., Kenyon L.C., Godwin A.K., Emlet D.R., Holgado-Madruga M., Lanham I.S., Joynes C.J., Vo K.T., Guha A., et al. Proteolytic cleavage of the CD44 adhesion molecule in multiple human tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 2002;160:441–447. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64863-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Wöhner B., Li W., Hey S., Drobny A., Werny L., Becker-Pauly C., Lucius R., Zunke F., Linder S., Arnold P. Proteolysis of CD44 at the cell surface controls a downstream protease network. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023;10:1026810. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1026810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Kolliopoulos C., Chatzopoulos A., Skandalis S.S., Heldin C.H., Heldin P. TRAF4/6 Is Needed for CD44 Cleavage and Migration via RAC1 Activation. Cancers. 2021;13:1021. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Lammich S., Okochi M., Takeda M., Kaether C., Capell A., Zimmer A.K., Edbauer D., Walter J., Steiner H., Haass C. Presenilin-dependent intramembrane proteolysis of CD44 leads to the liberation of its intracellular domain and the secretion of an Abeta-like peptide. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:44754–44759. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206872200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Murakami D., Okamoto I., Nagano O., Kawano Y., Tomita T., Iwatsubo T., De Strooper B., Yumoto E., Saya H. Presenilin-dependent gamma-secretase activity mediates the intramembranous cleavage of CD44. Oncogene. 2003;22:1511–1516. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Lee J.L., Wang M.J., Chen J.Y. Acetylation and activation of STAT3 mediated by nuclear translocation of CD44. J. Cell Biol. 2009;185:949–957. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200812060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Miletti-Gonzalez K.E., Murphy K., Kumaran M.N., Ravindranath A.K., Wernyj R.P., Kaur S., Miles G.D., Lim E., Chan R., Chekmareva M., et al. Identification of function for CD44 intracytoplasmic domain (CD44-ICD): Modulation of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) transcription via novel promoter response element. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:18995–19007. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.318774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.De Falco V., Tamburrino A., Ventre S., Castellone M.D., Malek M., Manie S.N., Santoro M. CD44 proteolysis increases CREB phosphorylation and sustains proliferation of thyroid cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2012;72:1449–1458. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Johansson E., Grassi E.S., Pantazopoulou V., Tong B., Lindgren D., Berg T.J., Pietras E.J., Axelson H., Pietras A. CD44 Interacts with HIF-2alpha to Modulate the Hypoxic Phenotype of Perinecrotic and Perivascular Glioma Cells. Cell Rep. 2017;20:1641–1653. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Bourguignon L.Y., Wong G., Earle C., Chen L. Hyaluronan-CD44v3 interaction with Oct4-Sox2-Nanog promotes miR-302 expression leading to self-renewal, clonal formation, and cisplatin resistance in cancer stem cells from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:32800–32824. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.308528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Cho Y., Lee H.W., Kang H.G., Kim H.Y., Kim S.J., Chun K.H. Cleaved CD44 intracellular domain supports activation of stemness factors and promotes tumorigenesis of breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6:8709–8721. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Tamada M., Nagano O., Tateyama S., Ohmura M., Yae T., Ishimoto T., Sugihara E., Onishi N., Yamamoto T., Yanagawa H., et al. Modulation of glucose metabolism by CD44 contributes to antioxidant status and drug resistance in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2012;72:1438–1448. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Christofk H.R., Vander Heiden M.G., Harris M.H., Ramanathan A., Gerszten R.E., Wei R., Fleming M.D., Schreiber S.L., Cantley L.C. The M2 splice isoform of pyruvate kinase is important for cancer metabolism and tumour growth. Nature. 2008;452:230–233. doi: 10.1038/nature06734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Christofk H.R., Vander Heiden M.G., Wu N., Asara J.M., Cantley L.C. Pyruvate kinase M2 is a phosphotyrosine-binding protein. Nature. 2008;452:181–186. doi: 10.1038/nature06667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Hitosugi T., Kang S., Vander Heiden M.G., Chung T.W., Elf S., Lythgoe K., Dong S., Lonial S., Wang X., Chen G.Z., et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation inhibits PKM2 to promote the Warburg effect and tumor growth. Sci. Signal. 2009;2:ra73. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Vander Heiden M.G., Cantley L.C., Thompson C.B. Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Matoba S., Kang J.G., Patino W.D., Wragg A., Boehm M., Gavrilova O., Hurley P.J., Bunz F., Hwang P.M. p53 regulates mitochondrial respiration. Science. 2006;312:1650–1653. doi: 10.1126/science.1126863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Anastasiou D., Poulogiannis G., Asara J.M., Boxer M.B., Jiang J.K., Shen M., Bellinger G., Sasaki A.T., Locasale J.W., Auld D.S., et al. Inhibition of pyruvate kinase M2 by reactive oxygen species contributes to cellular antioxidant responses. Science. 2011;334:1278–1283. doi: 10.1126/science.1211485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Gruning N.M., Ralser M. Cancer: Sacrifice for survival. Nature. 2011;480:190–191. doi: 10.1038/480190a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Hamanaka R.B., Chandel N.S. Cell biology. Warburg effect and redox balance. Science. 2011;334:1219–1220. doi: 10.1126/science.1215637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Nam K., Oh S., Shin I. Ablation of CD44 induces glycolysis-to-oxidative phosphorylation transition via modulation of the c-Src-Akt-LKB1-AMPKalpha pathway. Biochem. J. 2016;473:3013–3030. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Semenza G.L., Jiang B.H., Leung S.W., Passantino R., Concordet J.P., Maire P., Giallongo A. Hypoxia response elements in the aldolase A, enolase 1, and lactate dehydrogenase A gene promoters contain essential binding sites for hypoxia-inducible factor 1. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:32529–32537. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.51.32529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Gao R., Li D., Xun J., Zhou W., Li J., Wang J., Liu C., Li X., Shen W., Qiao H., et al. CD44ICD promotes breast cancer stemness via PFKFB4-mediated glucose metabolism. Theranostics. 2018;8:6248–6262. doi: 10.7150/thno.28721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Yalcin A., Telang S., Clem B., Chesney J. Regulation of glucose metabolism by 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatases in cancer. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2009;86:174–179. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2009.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Gatenby R.A., Gillies R.J. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004;4:891–899. doi: 10.1038/nrc1478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Lee S.H., Huang H., Choi K., Lee D.H., Shi J., Liu T., Chun K.H., Seo J.A., Lima I.S., Zabolotny J.M., et al. ROCK1 isoform-specific deletion reveals a role for diet-induced insulin resistance. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;306:E332–E343. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00619.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Ahn M., Oh E., McCown E.M., Wang X., Veluthakal R., Thurmond D.C. A requirement for PAK1 to support mitochondrial function and maintain cellular redox balance via electron transport chain proteins to prevent beta-cell apoptosis. Metabolism. 2021;115:154431. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Ahn M., Yoder S.M., Wang Z., Oh E., Ramalingam L., Tunduguru R., Thurmond D.C. The p21-activated kinase (PAK1) is involved in diet-induced beta cell mass expansion and survival in mice and human islets. Diabetologia. 2016;59:2145–2155. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4042-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Lopez J.P., Turner J.R., Philipson L.H. Glucose-induced ERM protein activation and translocation regulates insulin secretion. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;299:E772–E785. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00199.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Ponta H., Sherman L., Herrlich P.A. CD44: From adhesion molecules to signalling regulators. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;4:33–45. doi: 10.1038/nrm1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Bourguignon L.Y. Hyaluronan-mediated CD44 activation of RhoGTPase signaling and cytoskeleton function promotes tumor progression. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2008;18:251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Hassn Mesrati M., Syafruddin S.E., Mohtar M.A., Syahir A. CD44: A Multifunctional Mediator of Cancer Progression. Biomolecules. 2021;11:1850. doi: 10.3390/biom11121850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Weng X., Maxwell-Warburton S., Hasib A., Ma L., Kang L. The membrane receptor CD44: Novel insights into metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2022;33:318–332. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2022.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Hasenauer S., Malinger D., Koschut D., Pace G., Matzke A., von Au A., Orian-Rousseau V. Internalization of Met requires the co-receptor CD44v6 and its link to ERM proteins. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e62357. doi: 10.1371/annotation/6e6576eb-77b0-4892-90d4-ab298c00a216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Distel J.S., Ortiz Flores R.M., Bienvenu A., Aguilera M.O., Bonazzi M., Beron W. Ezrin and CD44 participate in the internalization process of Coxiella burnetii into non-phagocytic cells. Biol. Cell. 2022;114:237–253. doi: 10.1111/boc.202100096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Lin C.Y., Kolliopoulos C., Huang C.H., Tenhunen J., Heldin C.H., Chen Y.H., Heldin P. High levels of serum hyaluronan is an early predictor of dengue warning signs and perturbs vascular integrity. EBioMedicine. 2019;48:425–441. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]