Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1990 Sep;44(3):202–204. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.3.202

Use of questionnaires in a study of spontaneous abortion in a general population.

G Axelsson 1
PMCID: PMC1060642  PMID: 2273356

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE--The aim was to evaluate the appropriateness of postal questionnaires in studies of spontaneous abortion in a general population. DESIGN--Survey of spontaneous abortions by comparing diagnoses reported in questionnaires to information collected from hospital records and a discharge register. SETTING--The study took place in the general community. PARTICIPANTS--The study involved a random sample of 1400 women born between 1935 and 1960, living in two towns in the south west of Sweden. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--9% of spontaneous abortions among respondents were not reported in the questionnaire, and 31% were missing in the register; 80% of the spontaneous abortions reported in the questionnaire could be verified in hospital records, and a further 7% were mentioned in the records but not certified by a doctor; 97% of the diagnoses received by the women who had answered affirmatively to two complementary questions on spontaneous abortions could be found in the records. CONCLUSIONS--Postal questionnaires can be used in epidemiological studies of spontaneous abortions, among a general population as well as among occupational groups.

Full text

PDF
202

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Axelsson G., Lütz C., Rylander R. Exposure to solvents and outcome of pregnancy in university laboratory employees. Br J Ind Med. 1984 Aug;41(3):305–312. doi: 10.1136/oem.41.3.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelsson G., Molin I. Outcome of pregnancy among women living near petrochemical industries in Sweden. Int J Epidemiol. 1988 Jun;17(2):363–369. doi: 10.1093/ije/17.2.363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Axelsson G., Rylander R. Exposure to anaesthetic gases and spontaneous abortion: response bias in a postal questionnaire study. Int J Epidemiol. 1982 Sep;11(3):250–256. doi: 10.1093/ije/11.3.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Axelsson G., Rylander R., Molin I. Outcome of pregnancy in relation to irregular and inconvenient work schedules. Br J Ind Med. 1989 Jun;46(6):393–398. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.6.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Axelsson G. Selection bias in studies of spontaneous abortion among occupational groups. J Occup Med. 1984 Jul;26(7):525–528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ericson A., Källén B. An epidemiological study of work with video screens and pregnancy outcome: II. A case-control study. Am J Ind Med. 1986;9(5):459–475. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700090507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heidam L. Z., Olsen J. Self-reported data on spontaneous abortions compared with data obtained by computer linkage with the hospital registry. Scand J Soc Med. 1985;13(4):159–163. doi: 10.1177/140349488501300406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Joffe M. Advantages of a standard method for research on reproductive effects of occupation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1988 Sep;42(3):209–212. doi: 10.1136/jech.42.3.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Joffe M. Biases in research on reproduction and women's work. Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Mar;14(1):118–123. doi: 10.1093/ije/14.1.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindbohm M. L., Hemminki K. Nationwide data base on medically diagnosed spontaneous abortions in Finland. Int J Epidemiol. 1988 Sep;17(3):568–573. doi: 10.1093/ije/17.3.568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McDonald A. D., McDonald J. C., Armstrong B., Cherry N., Nolin A. D., Robert D. Work with visual display units in pregnancy. Br J Ind Med. 1988 Aug;45(8):509–515. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.8.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rosenberg M. J., Feldblum P. J., Marshall E. G. Occupational influences on reproduction: a review of recent literature. J Occup Med. 1987 Jul;29(7):584–591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wilcox A. J., Horney L. F. Accuracy of spontaneous abortion recall. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Nov;120(5):727–733. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES