Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1990 Sep;44(3):249–252. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.3.249

Willingness to accept risk in the treatment of rheumatic disease.

B J O'Brien 1, J Elswood 1, A Calin 1
PMCID: PMC1060652  PMID: 2273365

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE--The aim was to assess patients willingness to accept mortal risk in the drug treatment of chronic rheumatic disease. DESIGN--A non-random sample of consecutive patients were interviewed with a standardised survey instrument. SETTING--The study took place in the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK. PATIENTS--100 consecutive in- and out-patients aged 65 or less were interviewed, 50 with rheumatoid arthritis and 50 with ankylosing spondylitis. Mean age was 48 years with mean disease duration of 14 years. The rheumatoid arthritis group was mainly female (84%), v 26% in the ankylosing spondylitis group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Risk preferences were elicited using the method of standard gamble in the context of a hypothetical new drug. Patients indicated the maximum percentage probability of mortality they regarded as acceptable to achieve four different levels of benefit: total cure (20.7%), relief of pain (16.9%), relief of stiffness (13.1%), return to normal functioning (14.5%). Rheumatoid arthritis patients displayed a higher (p less than 0.05) willingness to accept risk than ankylosing spondylitis patients for all gambles except relief of stiffness. Analysis of variance indicated that willingness to accept risk decreases with the duration of disease and increases with reductions in self assessed health status. CONCLUSIONS--Evaluative methods such as standard gamble can elicit useful risk-benefit preference data from patients to assist those who manage clinical risks.

Full text

PDF
249

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Calin A., Elswood J., Rigg S., Skevington S. M. Ankylosing spondylitis--an analytical review of 1500 patients: the changing pattern of disease. J Rheumatol. 1988 Aug;15(8):1234–1238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hunt S. M., McEwen J., McKenna S. P. Perceived health: age and sex comparisons in a community. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1984 Jun;38(2):156–160. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.2.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kushner I. Does aggressive therapy of rheumatoid arthritis affect outcome? J Rheumatol. 1989 Jan;16(1):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lane D. A., Hutchinson T. A. The notion of "acceptable risk": the role of utility in drug management. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):621–625. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90023-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Llewellyn-Thomas H., Sutherland H. J., Tibshirani R., Ciampi A., Till J. E., Boyd N. F. The measurement of patients' values in medicine. Med Decis Making. 1982 Winter;2(4):449–462. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8200200407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McNeil B. J., Pauker S. G., Sox H. C., Jr, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1259–1262. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205273062103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McNeil B. J., Weichselbaum R., Pauker S. G. Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1981 Oct 22;305(17):982–987. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198110223051704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mulcahy D., Wright C., Mockus L., Yacoub M., Fox K. Cardiac transplantation in severely ill patients requiring intensive support in hospital. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Mar 19;296(6625):817–819. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6625.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Read J. L., Quinn R. J., Berwick D. M., Fineberg H. V., Weinstein M. C. Preferences for health outcomes. Comparison of assessment methods. Med Decis Making. 1984;4(3):315–329. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8400400307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sirken M. G. Error effects of survey questionnaires on the public's assessments of health risks. Am J Public Health. 1986 Apr;76(4):367–368. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.4.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science. 1987 Apr 17;236(4799):280–285. doi: 10.1126/science.3563507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Thompson M. S. Willingness to pay and accept risks to cure chronic disease. Am J Public Health. 1986 Apr;76(4):392–396. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.4.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Torrance G. W. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ. 1986 Mar;5(1):1–30. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ueshima H., Tatara K., Asakura S., Okamoto M. Declining trends in blood pressure level and the prevalence of hypertension, and changes in related factors in Japan, 1956-1980. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):137–147. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90065-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES