Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE--The aim was to determine the scope and quality of published health services research concerned with medical practice in the United Kingdom. DESIGN--Scope of health services research was reviewed in articles published in 41 medical and public health journals in 1985. In random sample of 60 papers stratified by study design, 18 key research parameters were assessed for the quality of reporting and application in the studies. MAIN RESULTS--Over 80% of the research described in 246 articles was carried out by clinicians, mostly without acknowledged epidemiological or statistical assistance. More than half the studies were descriptive and only 17% were trials. In studies of hospital services, 4% covered long term care, in contrast to 67% concerned with inpatient care. One third of studies were conducted in general practice but only 10% of these included an assessment of clinical outcome. Important research parameters were often not reported; for example, response rates were missing in 52% of the studies, and comparability of cases and controls was not stated in 42% of relevant studies. Major inadequacies were found in the conduct of research, particularly in the selection of controls, allowance for confounding factors, objectivity of measurements, application of statistical tests, and conclusions reached. CONCLUSIONS--Published health services research concerned with medical practice in the United Kingdom is often conducted by clinicians without expert assistance. The quality of reporting and methods employed are deficient in many respects. Short training courses and other initiatives are required to enhance the quality of health services research in medical practice.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Altman D. G., Gore S. M., Gardner M. J., Pocock S. J. Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 May 7;286(6376):1489–1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6376.1489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Butler J. R., Boddy F. A. The evolution of health services research in Britain. Community Med. 1983 Aug;5(3):192–199. doi: 10.1007/BF02548545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DerSimonian R., Charette L. J., McPeek B., Mosteller F. Reporting on methods in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1982 Jun 3;306(22):1332–1337. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198206033062204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feinstein A. R. Clinical biostatistics. XLIV. A survey of the research architecture used for publications in general medical journals. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1978 Jul;24(1):117–125. doi: 10.1002/cpt1978241117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher R. H., Fletcher S. W. Clinical research in general medical journals: a 30-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 1979 Jul 26;301(4):180–183. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197907263010403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gardner M. J., Machin D., Campbell M. J. Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 22;292(6523):810–812. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6523.810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gore S. M., Jones I. G., Rytter E. C. Misuse of statistical methods: critical assessment of articles in BMJ from January to March 1976. Br Med J. 1977 Jan 8;1(6053):85–87. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6053.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lionel N. D., Herxheimer A. Assessing reports of therapeutic trials. Br Med J. 1970 Sep 12;3(5723):637–640. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5723.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pocock S. J., Hughes M. D., Lee R. J. Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med. 1987 Aug 13;317(7):426–432. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198708133170706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schor S., Karten I. Statistical evaluation of medical journal manuscripts. JAMA. 1966 Mar 28;195(13):1123–1128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White S. J. Statistical errors in papers in the British Journal of Psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Oct;135:336–342. doi: 10.1192/bjp.135.4.336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]