Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1995 Jun;49(3):314–319. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.3.314

A time to pregnancy questionnaire designed for long term recall: validity in Oxford, England.

M Joffe 1, L Villard 1, Z Li 1, R Plowman 1, M Vessey 1
PMCID: PMC1060805  PMID: 7629471

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE--To establish the degree of validity of data on time to pregnancy, derived retrospectively using a short questionnaire. DESIGN--Information from the questionnaire was compared with data that had been collected concurrently from the same individuals. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS--Questionnaires were mailed to 1647 women who continue to be followed up by the Oxford Family Planning Association contraceptive study, and a further 424 were approached for personal interview. Response rates were 91% and 79% respectively. MAIN RESULTS--Matching was successful in 91% of pregnancies. Median recall time was 14 years (interquartile range, 11-16 years). At the group level, remarkably good agreement was found between the two sources of information, presented as cumulative percentage distributions of live births. The findings were at least as good with longer recall (> 14 years) as with shorter recall. Digit performance was present to a limited degree. At the individual level, some misclassification was evident, which has implications for statistical power. For detection of clinical infertility (no conception within 12 months), the sensitivity was in the range 67%-91%, and the specificity was 92%-96%. Variations with format, duration of recall, age at delivery, year of birth, parity, social class, smoking habit, last contraceptive method, and outcome (live birth or not) were generally small, and were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS--Time to pregnancy is a sensitive way of assessing reproductive function in either sex. Valid data at a group level can be derived retrospectively, with a long duration of recall, using a short questionnaire.

Full text

PDF
314

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Axelsson G. Use of questionnaires in a study of spontaneous abortion in a general population. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Sep;44(3):202–204. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.3.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baird D. D., Wilcox A. J., Weinberg C. R. Use of time to pregnancy to study environmental exposures. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Sep;124(3):470–480. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burns T. L., Moll P. P., Rost C. A., Lauer R. M. Mothers remember birthweights of adolescent children: the Muscatine Ponderosity Family Study. Int J Epidemiol. 1987 Dec;16(4):550–555. doi: 10.1093/ije/16.4.550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Canfield R. E., O'Connor J. F., Birken S., Krichevsky A., Wilcox A. J. Development of an assay for a biomarker of pregnancy and early fetal loss. Environ Health Perspect. 1987 Oct;74:57–66. doi: 10.1289/ehp.877457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carlsen E., Giwercman A., Keiding N., Skakkebaek N. E. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):609–613. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6854.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Irvine D. S. Falling sperm quality. BMJ. 1994 Aug 13;309(6952):476–476. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6952.476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Joffe M. Biases in research on reproduction and women's work. Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Mar;14(1):118–123. doi: 10.1093/ije/14.1.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Joffe M. Epidemiology of occupational reproductive hazards: methodological aspects. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1992;40 (Suppl 1):S17–S25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Joffe M. Feasibility of studying subfertility using retrospective self reports. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989 Sep;43(3):268–274. doi: 10.1136/jech.43.3.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Joffe M., Li Z. Association of time to pregnancy and the outcome of pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1994 Jul;62(1):71–75. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56818-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Joffe M., Villard L., Li Z., Plowman R., Vessey M. Long-term recall of time-to-pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1993 Jul;60(1):99–104. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56044-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rachootin P., Olsen J. Prevalence and socioeconomic correlates of subfecundity and spontaneous abortion in Denmark. Int J Epidemiol. 1982 Sep;11(3):245–249. doi: 10.1093/ije/11.3.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Seidman D. S., Slater P. E., Ever-Hadani P., Gale R. Accuracy of mothers' recall of birthweight and gestational age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Aug;94(8):731–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03717.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tietze C. Fertility after discontinuation of intrauterine and oral contraception. Int J Fertil. 1968 Oct-Dec;13(4):385–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vessey M. P., Wright N. H., McPherson K., Wiggins P. Fertility after stopping different methods of contraception. Br Med J. 1978 Feb 4;1(6108):265–267. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6108.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vessey M., Doll R., Peto R., Johnson B., Wiggins P. A long-term follow-up study of women using different methods of contraception--an interim report. J Biosoc Sci. 1976 Oct;8(4):373–427. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000010890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zielhuis G. A., Hulscher M. E., Florack E. I. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire on fecundability. Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Dec;21(6):1151–1156. doi: 10.1093/ije/21.6.1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES