Abstract
We present a case of a 16-year-old male with a Salter-Harris type II physeal slip of the distal femur managed with closed reduction and K wire and clamp-based external fixator. Knee range of motion exercises were initiated after one week. The union was observed at 10 weeks, and implant removal was done on an outpatient basis. At one year follow-up, the patient had good clinical and radiological outcomes. The K-wire-based external fixator frame is an effective fixation method for distal femur physeal slips in older children, providing favorable radiological and functional outcomes.
Keywords: salter-harris, physeal slip, physeal injuries, k wire-based external fixation, joshi external stabilization system, external fixation, disal femur physeal slip
Introduction
Distal femur physeal injuries are relatively uncommon, comprising about 1% of total physeal injuries [1]. Due to its rare nature, the management of such injuries is not well described and often leads to controversy. The distal femur physis is responsible for 70% of growth for the femoral length, and the chances of growth arrest, residual deformity, and other complications are high, further complicating the management [2]. There are limited fixation options for the fixation of these injuries. To the best of our knowledge, there is no description of such injuries being managed using K-wire-based external fixator devices. We present a case of a 16-year-old male child with a Salter-Harris type 2 physeal injury managed with a K-wire-based external stabilization system.
Case presentation
A 16-year-old male child presented to the casualty with complaints of pain, swelling deformity around the left knee, and inability to move the left lower limb following an alleged fall from a two-wheel motorcycle. There was no history of loss of consciousness, seizures, abdominal pain, weakness, or loss of sensations in the upper or lower limbs. On examination, there was a prominent swelling along the medial border of the thigh and leg sagging posteriorly. An associated displacement of the patella on the lateral side along with the tibia was also seen (Figures 1A-1C). On palpation, the medial swelling was tender, bony hard, and continuous with the femur. The normal anatomical relationship between the femur, patella and tibia was lost. Range of motion was not attempted, the distal pulses were palpable, and the patient could move his toes actively. The limb was splinted, and radiological examination revealed a Salter-Harris type II physeal slip (Figures 1D-1E).
The patient was then shifted to the operating theatre, where the closed reduction was done using two Steinmann pins as joysticks under spinal anesthesia. Once acceptable reduction was achieved, the physeal slip was stable and provisional reduction was done using 2.5 mm K-wires in a cross configuration. A K-wire-based external fixator system (Joshi external stabilization system [JESS]) was then constructed over the K-wires after pre-tensioning the wires to produce a stable construct (Figures 2A, 2B).
Knee range of motion and quadriceps strengthening exercises were started on the second postoperative day, and the patient was mobilized on non-weight bearing walker mobilization. Knee range of motion at two weeks was 0-30 degrees, and by eight weeks, it was 0-90 degrees on the fixator. Repeat X-ray showed union in an acceptable position, and the patient was planned for implant removal. At 10 weeks post-op, the patient walked without support and had a knee flexion of 90 degrees (Figures 3A-3B). The patient was on regular follow-up, and at 12 months post-op, the patient could sit cross-legged and squat without any limb length discrepancy. X-ray showed the union in an acceptable position (Figure 3C). The Knee Society Score (KSS) was 100 (excellent) at the final follow-up.
Discussion
Distal femur physeal slips often result in angular deformities and limb length discrepancies [3,4]. These injuries are more common in males, often following sporting activities, falls, and road traffic accidents, and are commonly Salter-Harris type 2 or 3 injuries [3,5-7]. Conservative management options are not preferred due to increased rates of loss of reduction and, eventually, manipulation [5]. Many treatment options have been described for the management of distal femur physeal slips ranging from smooth K-wires, Steinmann pin, screw fixation, and pediatric slide traction plates, have been described [3-8]. Most are type 2 injuries with high complication rates up to 36% [3]. Complications include growth arrest, limb length discrepancy and angular deformities, physeal bridge, injury to ligaments and menisci, peroneal neuropraxia and popliteal vessel injury [1,3-5,9].
Closed reduction is preferred for management, but up to 46% require open reduction [4]. Most authors have reported using percutaneous pinning, screw fixation, and crossed smooth K-wires after reduction for fixation. Non-physeal sparing techniques (fixation using Steinmann pins) have been reported to have higher complication rates but have not been found to be clinically significant [4,10]. The role of external fixation and its outcomes are not well explored in the literature. The method of external fixation has been described in a dog and rabbit using a circular fixator [11,12].
JESS is a versatile external fixation system based on K-wires, link clamps and rods. It works on the principle of distraction histiogenesis and provides dynamic, stable fixation. It was initially designed for hand injuries, but with time, its range of indications has been expanding in trauma, deformity correction, and plastic surgery. The frame allows for movement in the postoperative period, allowing better functional outcomes. The advantages of using this system for distal femoral physeal slips were that we were able to perform the reduction in a closed manner and hold the reduction in an acceptable position using the JESS construct, mobilize the patient early and avoid a long leg plaster, which would have otherwise led to knee stiffness. The K-wires spanning the physis were smooth and did not damage the physis. The frame was constructed in a manner that allowed for the initiation of the range of motion at the knee joint without compromising the stability of the fixation. The primary disadvantages of this construct are the risk of pin site infection, loosening of the construct and additional procedures for frame removal. Although we didn't encounter the complication of physeal arrest at one-year follow-up, the risk of physeal arrest is definite, and care should be taken to avoid excessive manipulation at the physeal region. The lack of long-term follow-up is one major limitation of this case study.
Conclusions
K-wire-based external fixator constructs are an acceptable mode of treatment for Salter-Harris type II physeal injuries of the distal femur as they provide good clinical, functional and radiological outcomes. The fixator is a less invasive mode of fixation and can be preferred for physeal injuries in which plate or nail osteosynthesis can create growth problems owing to open physis. The method can also be replicated for other physeal injuries of the lower limbs and doesn't need any major surgical procedure for implant removal.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Research and Project Approval Committee, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India issued approval NA
References
- 1.Imaging appearance of entrapped periosteum within a distal femoral Salter-Harris II fracture. Chen J, Abel MF, Fox MG. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44:1547–1551. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2201-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Intra-articular physeal fractures of the distal femur: a frequently missed diagnosis in adolescent athletes. Pennock AT, Ellis HB, Willimon SC, Wyatt C, Broida SE, Dennis MM, Bastrom T. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5:2325967117731567. doi: 10.1177/2325967117731567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.The clinical features, management options and complications of paediatric femoral fractures. Duffy S, Gelfer Y, Trompeter A, Clarke A, Monsell F. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021;31:883–892. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02933-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Physeal fractures of the distal femur: does a lower threshold for surgery lead to better outcomes? Adams AJ, Mahmoud MA, Wells L, Flynn JM, Arkader A. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020;29:40–46. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Traumatic injuries of the distal femoral physis. Retrospective study on 151 cases. Eid AM, Hafez MA. Injury. 2002;33:251–255. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00109-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Predicting the outcome of physeal fractures of the distal femur. Arkader A, Warner WC Jr, Horn BD, Shaw RN, Wells L. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27:703–708. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3180dca0e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Analysis of physeal fractures from the United States National Trauma Data Bank. Fuchs JR, Gibly RF, Erickson CB, Thomas SM, Hadley Miller N, Payne KA. Children (Basel) 2022;9 doi: 10.3390/children9060914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pediatric physeal slide-traction plate fixation for comminuted distal femur fractures in children. Lin D, Lian K, Hong J, Ding Z, Zhai W. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32:682–686. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182694e21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.A rare case of distal femur physeal fracture dislocation with positional vascular compromise in an adolescent male. Ambulgekar RK, Chhabda GK. J Orthop Case Rep. 2022;12:101–106. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i10.3386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.The effect of percutaneous pin fixation in the treatment of distal femoral physeal fractures. Garrett BR, Hoffman EB, Carrara H. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:689–694. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Use of a circular fixator construct to facilitate closed reduction and percutaneous stabilization of a distal femoral physeal fracture in a dog. Lazarus MA, Lewis DD, Johnson MD, Porter EG. Open Vet J. 2021;11:89–95. doi: 10.4314/ovj.v11i1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Influence of anabolic steroid on tibial fracture healing in rabbits - a study on experimental model. Ahmad F, Yunus SM, Asghar A, Faruqi NA. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:93–96. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4863.2679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]