Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2023 Oct 17;120(43):e2305097120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305097120

Correlating chemistry and mass transport in sustainable iron production

Xueli Zheng a,b, Subhechchha Paul a,c, Lauren Moghimi a,c, Yifan Wang a,c, Rafael A Vilá a, Fan Zhang d, Xin Gao a, Junjing Deng e, Yi Jiang e, Xin Xiao a, Chaolumen Wu f, Louisa C Greenburg a, Yufei Yang a, Yi Cui a, Arturas Vailionis a, Ivan Kuzmenko e, Jan llavsky e, Yadong Yin f, Yi Cui a,b, Leora Dresselhaus-Marais a,b,c,g,1
PMCID: PMC10614607  PMID: 37847734

Significance

Steel is an essential material of the modern world, but its production accounts for ~8% of the global CO2 footprint, half of which occurs from converting iron ores (oxides) into molten iron. Hydrogen-based reduction of iron ores (HyDR) offers green “ironmaking,” but scaling it to megatonne/yr throughput requires science to decouple the reduction kinetics and sintering. Our study reveals the importance of the smallest nanoscale particles intrinsic to iron ores in nucleating the “sticking” processes at previously unexplored temperatures. By resolving how the crystal packing and self-assembly of oxide particles couple to sintering that is known to mitigate the efficiency of clean ironmaking reactors, our experiments lay the foundations and need for multiscale HyDR chemistry.

Keywords: materials science, sustainability, extractive metallurgy, hydrogen-based direct reduction, nanochemistry

Abstract

Steelmaking contributes 8% to the total CO2 emissions globally, primarily due to coal-based iron ore reduction. Clean hydrogen-based ironmaking has variable performance because the dominant gas–solid reduction mechanism is set by the defects and pores inside the mm- to nm-sized oxide particles that change significantly as the reaction progresses. While these governing dynamics are essential to establish continuous flow of iron and its ores through reactors, the direct link between agglomeration and chemistry is still contested due to missing measurements. In this work, we directly measure the connection between chemistry and agglomeration in the smallest iron oxides relevant to magnetite ores. Using synthesized spherical 10-nm magnetite particles reacting in H2, we resolve the formation and consumption of wüstite (Fe1-xO)—the step most commonly attributed to whiskering. Using X-ray diffraction, we resolve crystallographic anisotropy in the rate of the initial reaction. Complementary imaging demonstrated how the particles self-assemble, subsequently react, and grow into elongated “whisker” structures. Our insights into how morphologically uniform iron oxide particles react and agglomerate in H2 reduction enable future size-dependent models to effectively describe the multiscale aspects of iron ore reduction.


Steel is ubiquitous in modern society, but its production contributes to 8% of global CO2 emissions (1–3). More than half of the CO2 emitted in steelmaking occurs when reducing the iron oxide ores into molten iron. Ironmaking is done predominantly using blast furnaces that use processed coal to form carbonaceous reducing agents (C and CO) in-process that generate vast CO2 emissions (4, 5). Gas injection has been exploited to reduce coal requirements and CO2 emissions, but coal is always required for blast-furnace ironmaking. Efforts have emerged to use natural gas (6, 7), electrochemistry (8), and hydrogen gas (9, 10) for cleaner ironmaking, but those only make up ~5% of the global market today (11).

Hydrogen-based direct reduction (HyDR) of iron ores is a different approach to ironmaking that replaces coal with H2 gas, generating H2O instead of CO2. While seemingly simple, the HyDR process has been slow to commercialize because of its endothermic chemistry, which requires the reaction to be operated at higher temperatures (12). However, high temperature causes the iron ores and product iron to agglomerate and clog the reactors due to a process called whiskering (13–15). Models of the whiskering process are known to be essential to effectively scale HyDR, but the high variability between different ores and local reactor conditions has yielded challenges in accuracy (9, 16).

It has been shown that accurate models must describe both the microstructure and chemistry of the reduction over time (3, 17). HyDR reactors typically operate at 800 to 1,000 °C, but the endothermic reaction causes microscopic temperature fluctuations inside the macroscopic vessels that change the local structure (15). Industrial ironmaking converts hematite (Fe2O3) ores into magnetite (Fe3O4) then wüstite (Fe1-xO) and finally iron (Fe), with the rate-limiting step being the Fe1-xO to Fe transition (18, 19). The proposed surface-based (topochemical) mechanism of wüstite to iron conversion is the depletion of substoichiometric oxygen (via diffusion) until it reaches a critical threshold to nucleate regions of the Fe phase (20). Several groups have observed kinetics differences at surface-based defects, i.e., boundaries between phases and grains, which is consistent with the topochemical models (15, 21). By contrast, early work demonstrated the reduction rate of iron oxide ores also depends strongly on the evolution of internal pores even in initially dense samples (22); similar findings have emerged more recently (23). Each step of the reactions significantly reduces the volume of the material, generating new defects that alter the rates of subsequent reduction steps.

Whiskering is known to proceed by first overcoming a relatively high activation energy to nucleate then continuing via a lower-energy growth mechanism (24). As such, the whiskering process is highly dependent on small distortions that seed further accumulation. Understanding the anomalous low-temperature mechanisms through which the local kinetics may link to whiskering is essential to design efficient reactors. To date, studies have characterized these relations in the mm-scale “pellets” used in most of today’s reactors, but the refined iron ores, or “fines,” consolidate the process using <100-μm-sized particles. In all cases, the smallest particles cause unexpected reactor failures. In pellet reactors, collisions between particles typically produce a dust called “pellet fines” that can enhance whiskering (25), while fines reactors observe defluidization from smaller particles (26). Submicrometer particles in iron ore reduction have been shown to be prevalent in most reactors today but are typically overlooked in reactor design models.

In this work, we present a multiscale view of HyDR chemistry using nanoparticles with advanced microscopy and scattering methods to directly map the formation of wüstite and then iron and its link to whiskering. We study pure iron oxide particles at nm-scales representative of the smallest particles in industrial iron ore fines. For comparison, we used controlled lab-synthesized 10-nm particles and compared them to industrial magnetite ore fines with H2 reduction. Using in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD), we demonstrate the kinetics of the two steps of reduction (Fe3O4 → Fe1-xO, then Fe1-xO → Fe) and observe unexpected Fe1-xO phase formation at 300 °C, despite the previously reported thermodynamic instability of the phase. Our results indicate that the formation and consumption of wüstite involve reaction rates that differ depending on the orientation and energy of each crystallographic surface (facet) at 300 °C. Simultaneous small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) indicated that as the reduction occurs, the particle sizes dramatically increase, suggesting the onset of a sintering process. Images of our samples by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray ptychographic tomography at the nano/microscopic scales reveal a complex hierarchical organizational process that illustrates the occurrence of whiskering even in the absence of the bulk crystals they usually agglomerate. Our study of pristine iron oxide nanoparticles affords a unique view of how chemistry links to multiscale mechanics in the absence of any impurities, initial porosity, or shape effects. This insight provides a key starting point to connect length scales in models to design and optimize different HyDR approaches.

Results

Comparison of Industrial and Nanoparticle Magnetite Reduction.

It is challenging to connect the chemistry of the industrial reaction between the nano- and micro-scales due to complexity of the reaction caused by the defects in natural samples. Therefore, we begin by comparing magnetite concentrate samples extracted from the Mesabi Range in Minnesota to lab-synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles in order to confirm the appropriate scale of nanoscale chemistry that is representative of the industrial fines. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of industrial iron ore fines (Fe3O4) shown in Fig. 1A display the wide range of particle size distributions from nanoscale to microscale (additional images shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S1). In comparison, we synthesized uniform spherical Fe3O4 nanoparticles with a 10-nm diameter (Fig. 1D). For the solid–gas reaction, XRD measures the phase transformations based on the amount of each crystal structure observed, as shown in Fig. 1. We performed in situ XRD for these reductions in an isothermal reactor at T = 800 °C using 2% H2/Ar for industrial fines (Fig. 1B) and nanoparticle (Fig. 1E) Fe3O4. In situ XRD showed the reduction of magnetite (Fe3O4) to wüstite (Fe1-xO), and subsequently Fe1-xO to Fe. We observed the phase fractions of Fe3O4, Fe1-xO, and Fe for industrial Fe3O4 (Fig. 1C) and nanoparticle Fe3O4 (Fig. 1F). Mapping the XRD signal, we observed a rapid reduction of Fe3O4 to Fe1-xO for both industrial Fe3O4 (Fig. 1C) and nanoscale Fe3O4 (Fig. 1F). Phase fraction results revealed the fast reduction from Fe3O4 to Fe1-xO. The rate-limiting step was the reduction of Fe1-xO to metallic Fe for both industrial Fe3O4 and nanoscale Fe3O4. Our industrial Fe3O4 fines exhibited an initial lag time for the first 90 min at 800 °C (Fig. 1C), indicating slow hydrogen diffusion rates in the industrial Fe3O4.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Morphology and reaction kinetics of (A–C) industrial Fe3O4 and (D–F) nanoscale Fe3O4. (A) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of industrial Fe3O4 and (D), TEM of nanoscale Fe3O4. In situ XRD of (B) industrial Fe3O4 and (E) nanoscale Fe3O4. Phase fraction of magnetite, wüstite, and iron for (C) industrial Fe3O4 and (F) nanoscale Fe3O4 derived from in situ XRD results. The uncertainty for the analysis is less than 3%.

Iron reduction kinetics is known to exhibit strong dependence on the rates of adsorption and diffusion of reactive species. The initial reaction begins with H2 surface adsorption and bond cleavage (27), but progresses via oxygen atom diffusion toward the surface along the kinetically favored directions (following Fick’s laws) (28). Studies have observed that the Fe1-xO phase’s metastability causes it to proceed via Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 to Fe at temperatures below 570 °C, while passing through Fe1-xO intermediates between Fe3O4 and Fe at higher temperatures. Our Fe3O4 nanoparticles had much faster reaction rates, with the majority of nanoscale Fe3O4 being reduced to Fe1-xO at 800 °C within 3 min (Fig. 1F). As such, for a mechanistic picture to compare with established literature, we explored this chemistry at lower temperatures, using synchrotron-based approaches.

Low-Temperature Reduction of Nanoscale Fe3O4.

The high X-ray flux and efficient X-ray detection at the Advanced Photon Source allowed us to resolve the low-temperature formation and consumption of Fe1-xO quite clearly, using the setup shown schematically in Fig. 2A (29). Representative XRD traces from our experiment at 300 °C are plotted in Fig. 2B, with markers at the bottom indicating the representative positions of the diffraction peaks characteristic of each phase. We unexpectedly observed the Fe1-xO phase forms preferentially in all reactions observed, even down to 300 °C. Many studies thus far have demonstrated that the Fe1-xO phase is thermodynamically unstable below 570 °C (30), though its kinetics compete with the low-temperature Fe3O4 → Fe reaction over a range of 450 to 570 °C (16). Our observation of the preferred formation of Fe1-xO down to 300 °C indicates that nanoparticles further kinetically prefer or stabilize this phase beyond previous findings (31, 32). Since previous size-dependent thermodynamic studies revealed that the surface to volume ratio should destabilize the wüstite phase (33), we hypothesize that this may be caused by kinetic effects, such as a lower transition state energy due to the size effects, for this pathway.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Overview of in situ XRD of chemistry for Fe3O4 nanoparticles at 300 °C. (A) A schematic of in situ small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and XRD experimental configuration. (B) Representative time traces of in situ XRD showing the nanoparticle chemistry of Fe3O4 at 300 °C in 2% H2 in Ar (g). (C) A plot of the formation of iron comparing our observations from 300 °C, 350 °C, and 800 °C. The uncertainty for the analysis is less than 3%. (D) The phases and facets of the anomalous 300 °C chemistry are shown by the normalized integrated intensity under the relevant {hkl} diffraction peaks. (E) The plot of the first derivative of the traces from (D), indicating the net consumption and formation of each phase and crystal plane as a function of time.

We included a plot in Fig. 2C to compare the trends for the formation of iron at 800 °C, 350 °C, and 300 °C; our results indicated three characteristic modes of these kinetics. At intermediate temperatures (350 °C), we observed a gradual conversion to iron, following a roughly logarithmic function, growing toward an asymptotic population from the beginning of the reaction time. At the very lowest temperature, however, we observe a lag time in the formation of metallic iron lasting ~200 min, after which the iron forms following an exponential distribution. We scale the curves collected from experiments at different temperatures to the estimated final phase fraction of Fe to illustrate the difference in extent of chemistry.

To investigate the dramatic change to the kinetics of Fe formation at 300 °C, we study the full progression of the consumption and formation of Fe3O4, Fe1-xO, and Fe, as plotted in Fig. 2D. The traces in Fig. 2D were calculated based on the area under the curve of each {hkl} peak in the XRD traces from Fig. 2B, which is related to the number of unit cells of the crystals that are oriented along that direction (c.f. the volume abundance). By taking the derivative of the area under each peak with respect to the time of the integrated intensities, we measured the rate of consumption/formation of each phase, as shown in Fig. 2E. The plots in Fig. 2E demonstrate rates of consumption for points with negative values, and rates of formation with positive values, all with magnitudes that scale with rate. In the case of magnetite and wüstite, the reaction rates differed for different diffraction peaks, indicating that the crystallographic orientation is intrinsically linked to the mechanism and associated kinetics. For a time-evolving system and a fully isotropically oriented initial powder, the changes to the relative peak areas between {hkl} planes imply needle-like shapes emerge that enhance the amount of the phase that is oriented along a specific crystallographic direction. In our reactive system, the temporal changes to the relative area under each peak thus indicate a crystallographic dependence of the reaction. We include a full description of our normalization procedures and interpretation of the synchrotron XRD analysis in SI Appendix, Supplementary Note 1.

As highlighted by the blue, green, and orange boxes in Fig. 2E, we observed three distinct behaviors of the phase transition dynamics, which we interpret to be different mechanistic stages of the chemistry. Each stage is distinguished by a change in the facet dependence and changes to the overall rate of conversion between phases. Starting from the perspective of phase conversion, in stage I (the first 19 min), the Fe3O4 is consumed while both the Fe1-xO and Fe form simultaneously. In stage II, we observe the consumption of Fe3O4 and net formation of Fe1-xO, with almost no change in the consumption/formation of Fe. Fe begins forming in stage III, at t = 200 min with Fe3O4 and Fe1-xO both being consumed at similar rates. Additionally, in stage I, the consumption of Fe3O4 is fastest along the {220} plane (gray), while the Fe1-xO formation is fastest along {200} (orange). By contrast, in stage II, the net rates of formation for the {200} and {220} (green) facets of Fe1-xO converge, while the Fe3O4 consumption along {220}, {311} (red), and {400} (blue) initially separate before coalescing by the start of stage III. In stage III, the rates for each crystallographic facet differ minimally for each oxide phase.

Facet-dependent rates of chemistry like we observe in stage I/II have been observed in other systems to occur based on the surface energy, which drives a change in the chemical driving force (Gibbs free energy) that governs the kinetics of the reaction (34, 35). Magnetite’s inverse spinel structure is often modeled as an Face Centered Cubic lattice of oxygen sites; this indicates surface energy trends of γ111 < γ100 < γ110 (36). We project the three planes measured in Fig. 2E onto the surface planes described in the literature (SI Appendix, Table S1) and find fastest along {220}, intermediate along {400}, and slowest along {311} which is consistent with a trend of the highest surface energy driving the fastest kinetics. In wüstite’s rock-salt structure, the surface energy trends as γ100 < γ110, which indicates the {110} facet has the strongest driving force for surface chemistry. We observe the wüstite phase forms fastest along the {200} facet and slows back to zero more rapidly, which is also consistent with the surface energy trends.

We interpret that the initial formation of both Fe1-xO and Fe in stage I indicates rapid surface chemistry, as there are sufficient active surface oxygen atoms to react with H2 directly with no mass transport limitations for the removal of H2O. This quickly converts to stage II, which exhibits strong rate dependence on the facet-energy during a sustained Fe3O4 to Fe1-xO conversion, indicating the strong influence of surface energy. The role of surfaces is complex in HyDR reactions, which are known to be sensitive to many parameters (16), making the native reduction mechanisms nontrivial to establish. Despite variation in the literature, the Fe3O4 to Fe1-xO transition has precedent in being modeled as a surface-dominated reaction (30), while the Fe1-xO to Fe transition is usually described as diffusion-limited.

As the reaction transitions from stage II to III, the formation of Fe becomes dominant, while the reaction rate of Fe1-xO and Fe3O4 phases remains nearly constant. On the other hand, early in stage III, the net reaction rate of the Fe1-xO phase crosses over from net formation to net consumption. We note that while we were not able to directly measure facet dependence in the iron phase, the significant narrowing of the peak widths in XRD indicates a significant increase in the effective particle sizes based on Scherrer broadening. The loss of facet dependence in the rate of consumption for both oxide phases and associated increase in crystal sizes is reminiscent of the whiskering mechanisms observed elsewhere (37). This led us to study how the dynamics in stage III coupled to nano- to micro-scale structural changes.

Microscopic View of Stage III Magnetite Reduction.

To directly map the changes in size as the nanoparticles react, we measured alternating XRD and SAXS patterns to resolve the average particle size across the measured 6-mm3 volume inside the reactor capillary. SAXS measures an integrated view of the characteristic size scales in a sample with large populations of submicrometer particles and/or voids. The SAXS progression in Fig. 3A plots in situ scattering traces collected during the Fig. 2 B–E reaction, from the start (purple) to the end, at 485 min (red). The measured values of Q correspond to 2πd   , where d   is the representative size scale of the scattering particle/void. The bump in the trace that we denote with a black arrow indicates a Guinier distribution that indicates our initial population of 10-nm diameter particles. As shown in Fig. 3A, the emergence of features at lower Q-values as the reaction time increases (shown by the red arrow) indicates the formation of larger features as the reaction progresses (~50 nm by the end of stage III). Our SAXS results indicate a size progression proceeds simultaneously with the stage III (t > 200 min) reduction chemistry in Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Size increases measured from reactors. (A) In situ SAXS of reduction reaction shown in Fig. 2 for the reaction in 2% H2 at 300 °C. TEM images of (B) the initial Fe3O4 nanoparticles, and (C–E) the final product formed after 8 h at (C) 300 °C, (D) 350 °C, and (E) 400 °C. All images show the products of reactions performed in 2% H2.

We further performed TEM measurements to see the morphology and size change of the reduced Fe3O4. As shown in Fig. 3 B–E, our TEM images revealed a mesoscale structuring mechanism at the particle scale for different temperatures. In all cases, we observed that the initial randomly packed nanoparticles (Fig. 3B) appear to self-assemble by the end of the reaction. For the reaction at 300 °C (Fig. 3C), this self-assembly is consistent with the modest size increase shown by SAXS because the particles sinter but retain their initial nanoparticular structure. With increasing temperatures, however, we observed a trend that the self-assembled particles appear to coalesce into ~100× larger particles (Fig. 3 D and E). While the coalescence of particles into new grains occurs to a limited extent at 350 °C, by 400 °C, it becomes the dominant effect, producing a large population of agglomerated and elongated grains of 100- to 350-nm length and 20- to 50-nm width (Fig. 3E). We include the details of our statistical analysis in SI Appendix, Supplementary Note 3. As our control experiments in Ar (g) formed isotropically random particle geometries at 400 °C (SI Appendix, Fig. S9), we interpret that the reactive H2 gas and associated phase transformations cause the preferential formation of elongated structures in Fig. 3E. Connecting these morphological changes to the dramatic change in the Fe formation function from Fig. 2C leads us to conclude that a critical temperature for the competing morphological changes that seem to accelerate the reaction between 300 °C and 400 °C.

While the lower temperature reactions seem to avoid the agglomeration mechanisms, the higher temperatures used in industrial reactors led us to explore how the high-T agglomeration enhances the kinetics of Fe formation. For deeper insights into the temporal evolution of the agglomeration process, we performed ex situ imaging of samples at different stages of the reaction at 400 °C (at 0-h, 2.5-h, and 8-h). TEM images of iron oxide reacted at 400 °C for 2.5 h showed the self-assemble structure (SI Appendix, Fig. S11). To connect the limited statistics of our TEM data to the bulk insights offered by our in situ XRD and SAXS analysis, we performed X-ray ptychographic tomography at the same time-points as our TEM images, as shown in Fig. 4. X-ray ptychographic tomography quantifies the 3D electron density integrated over every 3D voxel of the material, with extremely high spatial resolution.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

X-ray ptychography of the sintering process during nano-Fe3O4 reduction in 2% H2 in Ar at 400 °C. (A) Histograms of integrated voxel electron densities plotted in black, red, and blue for samples extracted after t = 0-h, t = 2.5-h, and t = 8-h. X-ray Ptychographic tomography results of (B) initial Fe3O4 nanoparticles; edge artifacts were removed for clarity (C) intermediate sample and (D) the final elongated grain structures.

For quantitative comparison between the X-ray ptychographic tomography measurements at each reaction time, we include a histogram of the voxel electron density values for each image (Fig. 4A). The peaks of each histogram show the most prominent electron density values for each stage of the reaction, which is determined by the material phase in the voxel and the packing density of the particles inside the voxel. From calculations of the different possible phases and packing densities, we identify a threshold at ~1,200 e/nm3 that delineates the different packing densities of oxides from those of pure iron. For our starting material, we identify a peak (black) at ~600 e/nm3 that indicates a mean packing density of 36 Fe3O4 particles per voxel. We note that this is ~55% fewer particles than the highest-density close-packed structure. After t = 2.5 h, the distribution (red) becomes bimodal, indicating two dominant populations of phase/packing density in the sample. After t = 8 h, the peak (blue) of ~1,400 e/nm3 indicates the conversion to the iron product, with a continued increase in packing density in the new Fe phase. We note that the broadness of the peak likely also indicates a significantly wider variance on packing densities in iron, as well as partial re-oxidation and/or incomplete chemistry. See SI Appendix, Supplementary Note 4 for a full description of our ptychography analysis.

The t = 2.5-h distribution exhibits two peaks whose values of 1,045 and 1,210 e/nm3 indicate electron densities on either side of the threshold value. While the lower valued peak indicates a high packing density of iron oxide particles (possibly fused to eliminate void space), the higher value corresponds to very low packing densities of the high-electron-density Fe phase beginning to form in small domains. From these findings, we interpret that the self-assembled particles begin the fusion/conversion process at the end of stage II, as seen by the anomalously dark regions.

The full 3D spatial maps of the packing densities of representative structures are shown for the starting material (Fig. 4B), the halted reaction at t = 2.5 h (Fig. 4C) and the sample collected after t = 8 h (Fig. 4D). We plot all 3D images of the reduced samples in Fig. 4 with ~1,200 e/nm3 as the color threshold from blue (oxide) to red (iron) voxels to highlight the microstructural changes associated with the Fe formation. Images in Fig. 4 show isosurfaces displaying the 3D contours of constant electron density for the highest electron density regions in the material at representative stages in reaction. We note that Fig. 4D is a higher resolution scan (18 nm) than the one given in the histogram, as it was required to prevent averaging of the fine features representative of the rods. The 3D structure for the blue trace from the histogram is shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S12. We display the increase in electron density by the color/transparency scaling shown in each figure. The initial samples show no preferred packing arrangements, as the domains of densest packing are random in size and orientation (also observed in Fig. 3B). In comparison, the intermediate timescale reveals many high electron-density domains, each with roughly spherical shapes that are representative of the nuclei of the Fe phase. The final image from the reaction shows rod-like linear structures that are analogous to the TEM structures in Fig. 3E.

Discussion

We interpret the connections between our XRD and imaging experiments by proposing a simple mechanistic model. For the anomalous early-stage magnetite reduction, we base our model on a multistep shrinking core model (35). Given the 10-nm size of our synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles, it is reasonable to assume that the gas–solid reaction undergoes a multistep shrinking core mechanism, as shown in Fig. 5 A–D. Stage I begins with the consumption of pure Fe3O4 and formation of both Fe1-xO and Fe. The product Fe1-xO and Fe are nucleating at multiple locations on the surface, as there are still abundant active oxygen sites of magnetite on the outer surface, as shown in Fig. 5E. At this stage, the rate is governed by the surface chemical reactions, as reported by Guo et al. (38).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

(A–D) Schematic of our multistep shrinking-core model describing the three stages of magnetite reduction. (D) The final agglomeration of the nanoparticles generates macroscopic whiskers. (E) Stage I schematic of multiple nucleation sites for wüstite and iron on the surface of a magnetite nanoparticle. (F) Stage II schematic showing the only moving reaction front between wüstite and magnetite (denoted by thick orange arrows). The solid white arrows indicate the oxygen reaction and diffusion paths, and the dotted arrow indicates the electron transport direction.

At the end of stage I, the nuclei of Fe1-xO and Fe adjoin, forming a thin layer of α-Fe at the outer surface (Fig. 5B). At this point, there is no active oxygen on the surface, and the process is primarily driven by diffusion: Oxygen atoms, O*, formed at the Fe1-xO-Fe surface require to diffuse through the product layer (α-Fe lattice) to reach the surface, as shown in Fig. 5F. This mechanism can be validated by estimating the dimensionless Thiele number Φ2 (39), defined as the ratio between the surface reaction rate and diffusion. We estimate the Thiele number Φ2 ~ 1017 (SI Appendix, Supplementary Note 2), demonstrating a strong diffusion-driven mechanism at the end of stage I and during stage II.

During stage II, we observe very slow formation of Fe, but fast consumption of Fe3O4 and formation of Fe1-xO, as shown in Fig. 2E. We propose that the overall reaction is separated into three steps and occurs simultaneously at the three interfaces (Fe surface, Fe1-xO-Fe interface, and Fe3O4-Fe1-xO interface). The redox reaction during stage II results in the moving reaction front between the Fe3O4 and Fe1-xO phases, while the Fe1-xO-Fe interface remains stationary, as illustrated in Fig. 5F. The electrons are transferred between these two interfaces, while the diffusion of the O* atoms in the Fe phase limits the overall reaction rate. An atomistic model for our proposed mechanism of electron transfer between the two reaction interfaces is discussed in SI Appendix, Supplementary Note 2.

As the reaction transitions from stage II to III, our ex situ TEM and ptychographic tomography observations (Figs. 3 and 4) suggest that there is a significant nanoparticle sintering at lower temperatures. We propose that the microstructure changes to the nanoparticles, thus breaking the diffusion-driven mechanism explained above. At intermediate (350 °C) to high (800 °C) temperatures, the agglomeration of the nanoparticles occurs at a higher rate. As a result, the separated stages I and II disappear at these temperatures, as corroborated by our results in Fig. 4D, due to competition between the fast agglomeration and the diffusional chemistry.

Previous thermodynamics models have illustrated that surface energies of iron oxides can change the relative energy stabilities of the different iron oxide phases in <100-nm particles (30, 33). In nanoparticles, the high surface to volume ratio amplifies this effect; however, the wüstite phase has been predicted to be destabilized by that effect. Our observations illustrate that despite thermodynamics, kinetic effects dominantly drive the Fe3O4 to Fe1-xO transition below the bulk stability of the Fe1-xO phase at 570 °C. This implies that the surface-stabilizing kinetics previously proposed extends to an even lower temperature during the Fe3O4 reduction in hydrogen—either due to stabilization at phase boundaries or other mechanisms.

The tubular structures in our images are characteristic of the “whiskering effect” often observed in HyDR on natural iron ore samples (37). Similarly, the facet dependence of the chemistry we observe is frequently observed in other nanoparticle systems. As we show in Fig. 1A, nanoparticles are present in natural iron ore fines used in industry, indicating that the unexpectedly formed Fe1-xO phase we observe by in situ XRD at 300 °C is relevant to anomalous cold spots generated in reactors today, though it is currently overlooked. While the nanoparticles are small, their preference for self-assembly and sintering indicates possible nucleation sites and/or barriers to the reduction that has not been explored in reactor-scale models. Nucleation sites are the highest-energy portion of most kinetic pathways and is thus essential to describe macroscopic nucleation and growth processes to connect the atomic-scale chemistry to the sintering.

Conclusions

This work studies the science underlying the coupling between chemistry and whiskering in HyDR at previously unexplored low temperatures and size scales. Our results reveal complex structuring in ribbon shapes formed by particles representative of the smallest lengthscales in iron ore fines. Our findings provide key insights into the kinetics and thermodynamics of this complex mechanochemistry giving a perspective into scales that are necessary to model “unconventional” feedstocks (i.e., bypassing the formation of pellets). Fundamental studies like ours are essential to inform the science to optimize the chemistry and mass transport essential to design and optimize new clean ironmaking processes.

Methods

Fe3O4 Nanoparticle Synthesis.

The Fe3O4 nanocrystals were synthesized by a high-temperature solution-phase hydrolysis reaction (40). NaOH stock solution (2.5 mmol/L) was prepared by dissolving 50 mmol NaOH in 20 mL diethylene glycol (DEG), followed by heating at 120 °C for 1 h under nitrogen and cooling down and keeping at 70 °C. FeCl3 stock solution (0.4 mmol/L) was prepared by dissolving 8 mmol FeCl3 in 20 mL DEG, followed by heating at 80 °C for 1 h and cooling down to room temperature. In a typical procedure, 288 mg polyacrylic acid (PAA), 5 mL of FeCl3 stock solution, and 10 mL DEG were mixed and heated to 220 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere for 30 min under vigorous magnetic stirring, forming a transparent light-yellow solution. Then, 4.5 mL of NaOH stock solution was injected rapidly into the above hot mixture, inducing the temperature drop to 210 °C and the reaction solution turned black immediately. The resulting mixture was further heated for 10 min. Then, another 5 mL of FeCl3 stock solution was injected into the above reaction. Upon the reaction temperature raised up to 220 °C, 3 mL of NaOH stock solution was added. After 15 min, Fe3O4 nanocrystals with a size of around 10 nm were obtained. The final products were cooled down to room temperature and washed by repeated actions of precipitation with ethanol and subsequent redispersion in deionized (DI) water several times, and finally redispersed in DI water. Fe3O4 nanoparticles in DI water were fully dried at 60 °C under vacuum and used as powder.

Synchrotron X-ray Measurements.

In situ ultra-small angle X-ray scattering, SAXS, and XRD were carried out at beamline 9-ID-C from the Advanced Photon Source, using a photon energy of 21 keV. A mixed gas of 2% H2 in Ar was flowed through the samples, which were packed into quartz capillaries with an inner diameter of 0.9 mm. Continuous gas flow was monitored using a bubbler, and the nanoparticles were held in place with glass wool. The temperature was controlled with an accuracy of ±5 °C with a thermocouple during the reactions.

X-ray ptychographic tomography was performed on the Velociprobe (41) located at 2-ID-D beamline at the Advanced Photon Source. Pure magnetite nanoparticles, intermediate, and final samples at the three reduction stages (t = 0, 2.5, 8 h, at 400 °C with 2% H2 gas in Ar) were prepared on Si3N4 windows with a membrane thickness of 200 nm. An 8.34-keV monochromatic X-ray beam was focused by a Fresnel zone plate with an outermost zone width of 50 nm, with an illumination size of about 1.5 μm on the sample plane. Ptychographic projection scan was carried out in a raster fly-scan pattern with a horizontal step size of 150 nm and a vertical step size of 300 nm. Far-field coherent diffraction patterns were recorded by a Dectris* Eiger X 500 K detector (2.335-m downstream of the sample) at a continuous frame rate of 100 Hz. For 3D scan of each sample, 315 ptychographic projections were acquired at angles ranging from −79° to 78° with an angular step of 0.5°.

Characterization.

Scanning electron microscopy images were collected using an FEI Magellan 400 XHR SEM with an field-emission gun (FEG) source. TEM images were taken at FEI Tecnai G2 F20 X-TWIN Transmission Electron Microscope with a FEG. The Empyrean X-ray Diffractometer from PANalytical was used for lab-based XRD data collection.

Supplementary Material

Appendix 01 (PDF)

Movie S1.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by the Stanford Doer School Sustainability Accelerator award, under contract 270636. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering (Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515). Part of this work was performed at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF), supported by the NSF under award ECCS-2026822. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a US DOE Office of Science user facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. We are also thankful to Yue Jiang and Xiaolin Zheng, (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University) for their help with control experiments.

Author contributions

X.Z., J.D., I.K., J.I., Y.C., and L.D.-M. designed research; X.Z., S.P., L.M., R.A.V., F.Z., X.G., J.D., Y.J., X.X., C.W., L.C.G., Y. Yang, Y.C., and A.V. performed research; X.Z., Y.W., F.Z., J.D., Y.J., C.W., A.V., I.K., J.I., and Y. Yin contributed new reagents/analytic tools; X.Z., S.P., L.M., Y.W., F.Z., X.G., J.D., Y.J., X.X., L.C.G., Y. Yang, Y.C., and L.D.-M. analyzed data; Y. Yin funded nanoparticle synthesis; Y.C. funded part of the work; L.D.-M. funded and supervised the work; and X.Z., S.P., L.M., Y.W., R.A.V., Y.C., and L.D.-M. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Footnotes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

*Certain commercial products or company names are identified here to describe our study adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the products or names identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

Raw data are available at https://osf.io/8mbtw/?view_only=283ed02216594786af8a117b2e90e13b (42). All other data are included in the manuscript and/or supporting information.

Supporting Information

References

  • 1.Rockström J., et al. , A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science 355, 1269–1271 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Papadis E., Tsatsaronis G., Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector. Energy 205, 118025 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Holappa L., A general vision for reduction of energy consumption and CO2 emissions from the steel industry. Metals 10, 1117 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Souza Filho I. R., et al. , Sustainable steel through hydrogen plasma reduction of iron ore: Process, kinetics, microstructure, chemistry. Acta Mater. 213, 116971 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu W., et al. , The production and application of hydrogen in steel industry. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy 46, 10548–10569 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang Y. D., et al. , Step-wise reduction kinetics of Fe2O3 by CO/CO2 mixtures for chemical looping hydrogen generation. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 5667–5675 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abu Tahari M. N., et al. , Influence of hydrogen and carbon monoxide on reduction behavior of iron oxide at high temperature: Effect on reduction gas concentrations. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46, 24791–24805 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Choi H.-G., et al. , Electrolysis of iron with oxygen gas evolution from molten sodium borate electrolytes. Ironmaking & Steelmaking 48, 1–8 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wolfinger T., Spreitzer D., Schenk J., Using iron ore ultra-fines for hydrogen-based fluidized bed direct reduction-a mathematical evaluation. Materials (Basel) 15, 3943 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dippenaar R., Industrial uses of slag (the use and re-use of iron and steelmaking slags). Ironmaking & Steelmaking 32, 35–46 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fan Z., Friedmann S. J., Low-carbon production of iron and steel: Technology options, economic assessment, and policy. Joule 5, 829–862 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bhaskar A., Assadi M., Nikpey Somehsaraei H., Decarbonization of the iron and steel industry with direct reduction of iron ore with green hydrogen. Energies 13, 758 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Piotrowski K., Mondal K., Wiltowski T., Dydo P., Rizeg G., Topochemical approach of kinetics of the reduction of hematite to wüstite. Chem. Eng. J. 131, 73–82 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang Y., Raipala K., Holappa L., Treatise on Process Metallurgy (Elsevier, 2014), pp. 2–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim S.-H., et al. , Influence of microstructure and atomic-scale chemistry on the direct reduction of iron ore with hydrogen at 700°C. Acta Mater. 212, 116933 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pineau A., Kanari N., Gaballah I., Kinetics of reduction of iron oxides by H2. Thermochim. Acta 447, 89–100 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lin H.-Y., Chen Y.-W., Li C., The mechanism of reduction of iron oxide by hydrogen. Thermochim. Acta 400, 61–67 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Piotrowski K., et al. , Effect of gas composition on the kinetics of iron oxide reduction in a hydrogen production process. Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy 30, 1543–1554 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rechberger K., Spanlang A., Sasiain Conde A., Wolfmeir H., Harris C., Green hydrogen-based direct reduction for low-carbon steelmaking. Steel Res. Int. 91, 1–10 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.He S., et al. , Direct reduction of fine iron ore concentrate in a conical fluidized bed. Powder Technol. 313, 161–168 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Spreitzer D., Schenk J., Iron ore reduction by hydrogen using a laboratory scale fluidized bed reactor: Kinetic investigation—experimental setup and method for determination. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 50, 2471–2484 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.John D. H. S., Matthew S. P., Hayes P. C., Establishment of product morphology during the initial stages of wustite reduction. Metall. Trans. B 15, 709–717 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhou X., et al. , Effect of pore formation on redox-driven phase transformation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 168001 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Song S., Pistorius P. C., Formation of hematite whiskers during magnetite concentrate oxidation. ISIJ Int. 59, 1765–1769 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wu S., Liu X., Wu J., Reduction disintegration behavior of lump ore in COREX shaft furnace. ISIJ Int. 8, 1608–1616 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guo L., et al. , A review on prevention of sticking during fluidized bed reduction of fine iron ore. ISIJ Int. 60, 1–17 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ma Y., et al. , Hierarchical nature of hydrogen-based direct reduction of iron oxides. Scripta Mater. 213, 114571 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Spreitzer D., Schenk J., Reduction of iron oxides with hydrogen—a review. Steel Res. Int. 90, 1900108 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ilavsky J., et al. , Development of combined microstructure and structure characterization facility for in situ and operando studies at the advanced photon source. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 51, 867–882 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Navrotsky A., Mazeina L., Majzlan J., Size-driven structural and thermodynamic complexity in iron oxides. Science 319, 1635–1638 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Navrotsky A., Ma C., Lilova K., Birkner N., Nanophase transition metal oxides show large thermodynamically driven shifts in oxidation-reduction equilibria. Science 330, 199–201 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jette E. R., Foote F., An X-ray study of the Wüstite (Fe1-xO) solid solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 1, 29–36 (1933). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Alexandra N., et al. , Nanophase transition metal oxides show large thermodynamically driven shifts in oxidation-reduction equilibria. Science 330, 199–201 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Parkinson G. S., et al. , Fe3O4(110)–(1×3) revisited: Periodic (111) nanofacets. Surface Sci. 649, L120–L123 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li Z., First-principles-based microkinetic rate equation theory for oxygen carrier reduction in chemical looping. Chem. Eng. Sci. 247, 117042 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Santos-Carballal D., Roldan A., Grau-Crespo R., de Leeuw N. H., A DFT study of the structures, stabilities and redox behaviour of the major surfaces of magnetite Fe(3)O(4). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 21082–21097 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lu F., et al. , Numerical simulation of iron whisker growth with changing oxygen content in iron oxide using phase-field method. Comput. Mater. Sci. 125, 263–270 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Guo X., Sasaki Y., Kashiwaya Y., Ishii K., Microreaction mechanism in reduction of magnetite to wustite. Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 35, 517–522 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Thiele E. W., Relation between catalytic activity and size of particle. Ind. Eng. Chem. 31, 916–920 (1939). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ge J., et al. , One-step synthesis of highly water-soluble magnetite colloidal nanocrystals. Chemistry 13, 7153–7161 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Heumann T., Diffusion in Metallen: Grundlagen, Theorie, Vorgänge in Reinmetallen und Legierungen (Springer-Verlag, 1992). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dresselhaus-Marais L. E., Supplementary Raw Data for PNAS Oct 2023. OSF HOME. https://osf.io/8mbtw/?view_only=283ed02216594786af8a117b2e90e13b. Accessed 1 October 2023.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix 01 (PDF)

Movie S1.

Data Availability Statement

Raw data are available at https://osf.io/8mbtw/?view_only=283ed02216594786af8a117b2e90e13b (42). All other data are included in the manuscript and/or supporting information.


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES