Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2023 Oct 30;13:18616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45230-z

Exposure to urban nanoparticles at low PM1 concentrations as a source of oxidative stress and inflammation

Francesca Costabile 1,2,, Maurizio Gualtieri 3,, Matteo Rinaldi 2,4, Silvia Canepari 5, Roberta Vecchi 6, Lorenzo Massimi 5, Gianluca Di Iulio 1, Marco Paglione 2,4, Luca Di Liberto 1, Emanuela Corsini 7, Maria Cristina Facchini 4, Stefano Decesari 2,4
PMCID: PMC10616204  PMID: 37903867

Abstract

Exposures to fine particulate matter (PM1) have been associated with health impacts, but the understanding of the PM1 concentration-response (PM1-CR) relationships, especially at low PM1, remains incomplete. Here, we present novel data using a methodology to mimic lung exposure to ambient air (2<PM1< 60 μg m-3), with minimized sampling artifacts for nanoparticles. A reference model (Air Liquid Interface cultures of human bronchial epithelial cells, BEAS-2B) was used for aerosol exposure. Non-linearities observed in PM1-CR curves are interpreted as a result of the interplay between the aerosol total oxidative potential (OPt) and its distribution across particle size (dp). A dp-dependent condensation sink (CS) is assessed together with the distribution with dp of reactive species . Urban ambient aerosol high in OPt, as indicated by the DTT assay, with (possibly copper-containing) nanoparticles, shows higher pro-inflammatory and oxidative responses, this occurring at lower PM1 concentrations (< 5 μg m-3). Among the implications of this work, there are recommendations for global efforts to go toward the refinement of actual air quality standards with metrics considering the distribution of OPt with dp also at relatively low PM1.

Subject terms: Environmental sciences, Environmental chemistry, Environmental impact

Introduction

In the past decade, much research has focused on the understanding of how human and planetary health is threatened by the fine particulate matter (PM2.5, particles with aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 μm) in the atmosphere16. A large body of epidemiological evidence supports a causal relationship between long-term exposure to outdoor PM2.5 and premature mortality3,79. However, it remains challenging to create a comprehensive model explaining the varying toxicological impact of each μg of PM2.5 in the air1,5,6,10,11. Recently, the WHO guidelines for outdoor PM2.5 addressed, in particular, the low range of PM2.5 concentrations (< 5 μg m-3, i.e. below actual air quality standards) . These guidelines reflect the near-background global PM2.5 concentrations. This is the range where the understanding of the concentration-response (CR) relationship for PM2.5 and mortality remains largely incomplete7,8,12,13. Evidence is to be sought by identifying a causal association combined with a set of plausible toxicological mechanisms and intermediate endpoints by which PM2.5 could cause adverse health effects.

There is a growing scientific consensus that the capacity of inhaled PM2.5 to induce oxidative stress and inflammation in exposed populations may be a primary pathway leading to the development of cardiovascular disease outcomes11,1416. Among the mechanisms possibly associated with adverse health outcomes, there is the initiation of inflammatory response within the conducting airways via pro-oxidative and/or pro-inflammatory mediators17; translocation of nanometer-size particles (or ultrafine particles, UFPs, diameter < 100 nm) and/or particle constituents such as organic compounds and metals across the alveolar barrier18,19, as well as indirect responses triggered by the activation of airways sensory nerves and, in cascade misbalancing the autonomic nervous system imbalance20. For each of these pathways, a cellular oxidative imbalance between the generation and elimination of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can potentially occur14. This is clearly depending upon the nature of the atmospheric aerosols (the interplay between their particle size and components versus gases and vapors), in a complex fashion which is still to be elucidated21,22. Synergistic effects can occur among different physical and chemical properties. The so-called Trojan-horse mechanism has been proposed to enhance the intracellular release of toxics if bound to nanometer-sized particles, and hence the damaging action of partially soluble materials due to the partial solubilization of these particles within cells16,22,23. This mechanism is likely to act also for atmospheric aerosols. Indeed, the solid core of ultrafine particles may act as a carrier for inorganic and organic species as reported for classical carbon nanotubes24 although the role of airborne organic nanoparticles cannot be excluded25.

The complex mixture of PM2.5 includes liquid and solid particles suspended in the ambient air. These particles span in size from a few nanometers to dozens of micrometers, and hugely vary in chemical composition, origins, shape and mixing state. These particles also exhibit complex atmospheric aging processing, and differential toxicities10,26. Nonetheless, PM2.5 mass alone in the atmosphere is still referred to and used as an air pollution control variable for analysis of human and planetary health. The Global Burden of Disease for ambient air pollution still refers to health risks in one concentration-response (CR) function related to PM2.5 mass, which the WHO also uses8,27. It is clear that the complexity goes well beyond the currently used PM2.5 mass metric, but no robust alternative has been found. The mass concentration of certain components of PM2.5, such as Black Carbon (BC), redox-active transition metals and Secondary Organic Aerosol (OA), and the number concentration in certain size-ranges, such as below 100 nm (UFPs), have been proposed8. The potential of PM2.5 to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and produce oxidative stress (the so-called oxidative potential, OP) has also received considerable attention2832. However, our understanding is poor, and PM2.5 mass alone still drives health-related policies. It is mandatory that the focus of air pollution studies now shifts to understanding the causal relationship between health effects onset and specific aerosol properties (not just emissions and atmospheric chemistry) and to suggesting health-relevant aerosol exposure guidelines that are planetary in scope33,34.

In this study, we show novel data taken during the super-intensive observational periods (SIOPs) of the ’Redox Activity and Health Effects of Atmospheric Primary and Secondary Aerosol’ (RHAPS) experiment, held in the Po Valley in 2021. During the RHAPS experiment, detailed information on physicochemical aerosol properties was measured, together with toxicological markers at the ambient atmospheric PM1 concentrations (2<PM1< 60 μg m-3)35. During the SIOPs, an additional set of observations was carried out and these are described here for the first time. The aim was to mimic PM1 exposure conditions, representative of human inhalation and deposition, with minimized UFPs sampling artifacts. We used an in vitro model of lung bronchial epithelium (BEAS-2B cells) exposed at the air-liquid interface (ALI) to the ambient atmosphere3537. The final scope is to address unresolved scientific questions related to the potency of PM1 and UFPs to induce oxidative and inflammatory responses in the lungs, under ambient atmospheric conditions, with emphasis on low PM1, as well as on the interplay between UFPs and redox-active compounds (the OP). We specifically addressed the interplay between the OP and UFPs, in agreement with most of the literature suggesting that the OP may be one of the many possible drivers of the acute health effects of PM2.528,30,31, as well as that UFPs small particle size may result in higher lung deposition and ability to pass into the bloodstream11,21,38,39. We combine conventionally used metrics (total mass and number concentrations) to additional parameters of the air mixture, such as the total OP31, and the Condensation Sink (CS) as a function of particle size4042. We identified relevant urban aerosol types through the combination of these parameters and then tested these against in vitro toxicological outcomes.

A reference model for aerosol exposure onto Air Liquid Interface (ALI) cultures of human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) at physiological conditions was used4348. We evaluated cell responses after 24-h exposure. Expression patterns for two reference genes, the Heme oxygenase (HMOX-1) and CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL-8), indicators of the anti-oxidant defense37,43,49,50, and pro-inflammatory37,51,52 response pathways respectively, are finally considered for exploring and describing novel unreported associations between aerosol physicochemical properties and adverse health response markers.

Material and methods

Measurements were carried out during the of the experiment. SIOPs were carried out at the urban background site of Bologna (BO) in the Po Valley , Italy, one of the major air pollution hotspots in Europe.

The entire RHAPS experiment was carried out from January 2021 to July 2021 (we reckon that data may be influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic). Within the RHAPS experiment, SIOPs lasted 16 days. These 16 days were split into four 4-day periods (SIOP1-4). Each SIOP was conducted from Tuesday morning to Saturday morning. The timing was as follows:

  • SIOP1) 26 January h 08:00 am / 3 February h 08:00 am;

  • SIOP2) 2 February h 08:00 am / 6 February h 08:00 am;

  • SIOP3) 16 February h 08:00 am / 20 February h 08:00 am;

  • SIOP4) 29 June h 08:00 am / 2 July h 08:00 am.

The winter and summer SIOP periods were planned in advance based on previous data analysis. However, the exact dates of each SIOP were decided week-by-week according to the results of a proper air quality model run every week to forecast weather conditions and selected variables. This subset of variables, including particle mass and number concentration, the black carbon to organic aerosol (BC-to-OA) ratios, and particle diameter, were selected according to our previous knowledge. Basically, we aimed at: (i) catching aerosol accumulation in the atmosphere by having each SIOP last four consecutive stable weather days, starting from a clean day (i.e., good weather possibly following bad weather conditions); (ii) starting SIOPs on Tuesdays and ending on Saturdays to be consistent with traffic emission source paths; (iii) having SIOP representative of source-specific aerosol types, biomass burning, urban aerosol high in traffic emissions, secondary aerosols, and clean conditions.

In addition to the detailed observations of aerosol physicochemical properties carried out during the entire RHAPS experiment, only during the SIOPs cell exposure at the Air Liquid Interface (ALI) and particle-bound ROS were assessed. Methods used to produce the data described in this paper are described in details below. The description of the overall RHAPS experiment can be found in a previous paper35 and only a brief summary is provided below. Detailed quality assurance and quality control procedures are described in earlier work36,37, and references therein.

Experimental set-up

During the entire RHAPS experiment, field observations were carried out in the province of Bologna (BO) using a tandem combination of urban background (BO) and rural sites (San Pietro Capofiume, SPC, 30 km NE of BO). Aerosol physicochemical properties in PM1 (chemical components, metals, particle number size distribution, and optical properties) were measured both continuously (time resolution of minutes to hours), and off-line (daily filter collection). Daily filters were also collected for laboratory analysis of oxidative potential and toxicological endpoints.

Oxidative potential (OP) was measured daily (from 8 a.m. to 8 a.m.) both during the SIOPs and during the entire RHAPS experiment. PM1 samples were collected on membrane filters by daily (24h) samplings using low-volume (1.15 m3 h-1) sequential samplers. The daily measurements were carried out in parallel, collecting approximately 60 samples at the Bologna and San Pietro Capofiume sites in winter (from 21 January to 18 March 2021) and 35 in summer (from 8 June to 14 July 2021).

Several parallel sampling lines were used at both sites to collect samples for a complete chemical characterization of the aerosol in terms of mass concentration, elements, ions, and carbon components. Daily PM1 samples were collected (from 8 a.m. to 8 a.m.) on 47 mm diameter polytetrafluoroethylene ( PTFE ) filters (Pall R2PJ047, Pall Life Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and precoated quartz fiber filters (PallflexTissuquartz 2500 QAO-UP, Pall Life Sciences, Ann Arbor MI, USA). The mass concentration was determined gravimetrically on PTFE filters using a Sartorius microbalance with a sensitivity of 1 μg and it ranges from 0.1 to 1.5 μg per filter with an average value of 0.5 ± 0.3 μg over the entire monitoring period (including both summer and winter).

Aerosol properties

Non-refractory PM1 components

The mass loading and chemical composition of submicron aerosol particles were obtained online by the High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (HR-TOF-AMS, Aerodyne Research) [32] at both locations. The HR-TOF-AMS provides measurements of the non-refractory sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, chloride, and organic mass of the submicron particles (NR-PM1). The working principle of the HR-TOF-AMS is described in detail in [32,33,34]. Briefly, during all the campaigns, the HR-TOF-AMS was operating in V ion path modes every 2.5 min. The resolving power [35] of the V-ion mode was about 2000-2200 during all the campaigns. Ionization efficiency (IE) calibrations were performed before and after every campaign and approximately once every two weeks during the campaigns. Filter blank acquisitions during the campaign were performed at least once a day to evaluate the background and correct the gas-phase contribution. All data were analyzed using the standard ToF-AMS analysis software SQUIRREL v1.57 and PIKA v1.16 (D. Sueper, available at: http://www.cires.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/ToFAMSResources/ToFSoftware/index.html, accessed on 1 September 2021) within Igor Pro 6.2.1 (WaveMetrics, Lake Oswego, OR, USA). The HR-TOF-AMS collection efficiency (CE) was calculated based on aerosol composition, according to [36] and confirmed against parallel offline measurements. At both sampling stations, the aerosol was dried to about 35-40% by means of a Nafion drier before sampling with the HR-TOF-AMS.

Black carbon

A 7-wavelength (370, 470, 520, 590, 660, 880, and 950 nm) aethalometer (model A33, Magee scientific [46]) provided eBC mass concentration and AAE with 1 min time resolution. According to the instrument manufacturer, the eBC mass concentration from AE33 was obtained from measurements at λ = 880 nm with a mass absorption coefficient of 7.77 m2/g The aerosol sampling line was dried to about 20–30% by means of a Nafion drier.

Particle number size distribution

The Particle Number Size Distribution (PNSD) was measured by combining a Mobility Particle Size Spectrometer (TROPOS SMPS) equipped with a butanol-based condensation particle counter (CPC, model 3772, TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN, USA) and a commercial aerodynamic particle sizer (APS, TSI). The aerosol sampling line was dried to about 20–30% by means of a Nafion drier.

Condensation sink

The aerosol condensation sink (CS) is a commonly used measure of how rapidly molecules condense onto pre-existing aerosols40,42. For particles with diameter dp and particle number size distribution Ndp, the CS was calculated by (Eq. 1):

CS=4πDdpmindpmaxβm(dp)·dp·Ndpddp 1

D is the diffusion coefficient of the condensing vapor (considered to be sulfuric acid, as usually assumed). βm is a transition regime correction defined as a function of the Knudsen number (Kn = 2λ/dp):

βm=1+Kn1+1.677Kn+1.333Kn2

In the molecular regime (Kn >>1, i.e. particle diameters >> 100 nm), CS is proportional to the square of particle diameter. In the continuum regime (Kn <<1, i.e. particle diameters << 10 nm), CS is proportional to the particle diameter. Our data (8 nm <dp<1000 nm) are in the transitional regime.

The CS (Eq. 1) was integrated upon different particle size ranges (dpmindpmax): dp<20 nm (in the nucleation mode, here indicated as CS8-20), 20<dp<40 nm (in the Aitken mode, here indicated as CS20-40), 40<dp<100 nm (in the soot-mode, here indicated as CS40-100), 100<dp<200 nm (in the condensation mode, here indicated as CS100-200), 200<dp<900 nm (in the larger accumulation mode, here indicated as CS200-900).

Source apportionment of PNSD

The particle number size distribution (PNSD) was statistically analyzed to identify major aerosol types. We already described the methodology in previous papers53,54. Briefly, to identify statistically independent factors in the urban aerosol, we conducted principal component analysis (PCA) encompassing aerosol particle number size distributions. The resulting PCs, outstanding with respect to their temporal persistence, could be associated with aerosol particle modes53. Then, we combined PCA results with a clustering analysis to categorize the collected aerosol size distributions into main categories, and hence major aerosol types. The complete results of this statistical analysis can be found in the SI, Figs. S8, S9.

The PCA analysis shows three major components explaining 87% of the temporal variance; these were similarly extracted by the cluster analysis. To describe these in terms of comparable variables relevant for modeling and process analysis, we fitted the modes identified by both the principal component and the cluster analysis with the multi-log-normal distribution function55 and calculated the three parameters characterizing relevant individual lognormal modes, i.e. the mode number concentration (N), the geometric variance σ, and geometric mean diameter μ. There is only one component (PC2, Cluster 2, the second in terms of variance explained, 26% ) showing an almost unimodal particle number size distribution with μ below 20 nm (μ=18 ± 2 nm). It shows a very small second mode at μ= 48 ± 18 nm, and no accumulation mode. In the wintertime, it peaks at the rush hours of the weekdays and doesn’t occur on the weekend. In the summertime, it shows an additional midday peak. We explain this component by traffic emissions and photochemically driven secondary particle formation associated to traffic emissions, consistent with our previous frequent observations53 in urban areas of an aerosol type with monomodal number size distribution in the 3–20 nm particle size range occurring at midday/early afternoon after photonucleation occurs and following traffic rush hours.

We note that the particle size range identified by the dry electrical mobility diameter smaller than 20 nm (in fact, 8–20 nm, based on the lowest cut-off of the instrument) almost uniquely indicates this aerosol type. Accordingly, we considered the number concentration of particles in the 8-20 nm size range (N8-20) as a first indicator for traffic-related photonucleation mode particles.

Although the statistical analysis shows a mode centered at μ=18 ± 2 nm, we recall that our data are constrained by the lowest size cutoff at 8 nm of measurements: the lognormal fitting suggests an additional nucleation mode centered between 1 and 10 nm. However, the smallest size cut of the instrument doesn’t allow us to track exactly a possible nucleation event, and we consider these particles as shortly aged in the atmosphere.

Metals

Water-soluble and insoluble metal concentrations for Al, As, Ba, Bi, Cd, Ce, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Fe, Ga, K, La, Li, Mn, Mo, Na, Pb, Rb, Sb, Sn, Ti, Tl, U, V, W, Zn, and Zr, were obtained from PTFE filters collected every 24 hours (from 8:00 a.m to 8 a.m) at the urban background site of BO in PM1 samples, analyzed by ICP-MS.

PM1 mass concentration

PM1 mass concentration with 5 min time resolution was constructed from the PNSD data, according to the procedure described elsewhere36. In short, PM1 was calculated from the particle volume size distribution under the hypothesis of spherical particles, and a size-dependent particle density varying from 1.25 to 1.5 g /cm3 was assumed. The daily PM1 from SMPS was then validated according to the daily PM1 measured through the reference procedure, the goodness of fit being R2 = 0.99.

Biological responses

Cell culture

The in-vitro test system consisted of an immortalized epithelial cell line derived from normal human bronchial cells (BEAS-2B cells 95102433, ECACC, Salisbury, UK). BEAS-2B cells, currently used for air pollution toxicological studies, retained a large representativeness of the normal bronchiolar epithelial cells43,44,47,48,56.

The human bronchial epithelial cells were maintained in LHC-9 medium at 37C with 5% of CO2, and split every 3 days. 72 h before exposure BEAS-2B were seeded on collagen-coated inserts (12 wells multiplate Teflon transwell inserts with 0.4 μm pores, collagen-coated Corning, NY, USA) at a density of 40x103 cells/insert and let to grow. The inserts were then transferred to the site of exposure and 24 h before starting the first experiments, the medium at the apical side of the transwell was removed to let the cells at the air-liquid interface and promote cell differentiation. The exposure of the lung model was, therefore, performed with cells constituting a continuing layer, approximately 100% confluence, according to the physiological condition of lung epithelia.

Exposure at the air liquid interface

The exposure procedure was performed according to37 with slight modification. Briefly, six inserts were transferred into the CULTEX® RFS Compact module and the basal side of each chamber was filled with 4 mL of LHC-9 medium (Gibco, Life Technologies, Monza, Italy) just before the beginning of the exposure.

The exposure technology selected is reported to allow for an optimal and uniform distribution of particles of different dimensions among the different inserts with minimal losses57.

Cells were exposed at ALI to the native atmosphere (with a cutting cyclone to 1 μm of aerodynamic diameter ) or to filtered environmental air (air was first bubbled in sterile water, then passed through a charcoal filter to remove remaining volatile compounds and then through an absolute filter to remove the particulate phase) for 24 h from 8 AM to 7:59 AM of the subsequent day. The temperature of the exposure chamber was maintained at 37C. It is well known that this generates a water vapor phase that keeps the exposure chamber a 100% as expected in the lung. During each week of exposure, four independent experiments were performed. At the end of each exposure, each insert was visually scored for clear signs of sufferance by a reverted microscope (Zeiss Axiovert 100, Germany).

Among the six exposed inserts, one control and one exposed insert randomly chosen and were manipulated to collect mRNA and to assess the differential expression of the following genes (HMOX-1 and CXCL-8, discussed here and relevant to assess the oxidative and pro-inflammatory potential of airborne PM58,59, and Gadd45α, NQO1, ATM relevant for DNA damaging pathways, also the release of the interleukin IL-8 was assessed in the culture medium) one control and one exposed for DNA damage analysis (by Comet Assay), and the two-remaining insert for protein extraction (for possible proteomic characterization). Variation in the gene expression was evaluated in triplicate and both considering down-regulation and up-regulation of the selected genes according to60. During each week of exposure, three additional inserts were kept in the local incubator and considered as additional references to the biological response of cells exposed through the ALI module.

Exposure doses of cells were calculated according to37 . Briefly, SMPS data (as reported in35 and in the section above) were used to define the mass size distribution according to the procedure described elsewhere36. The deposition of particles, according to the size and density was calculated considering impaction and random sedimentation61. Previous studies have shown that the deposition efficiency of micro and nanoparticles have a higher stability of the systems in terms of even distribution of the mass deposited and a high efficiency of deposition at different size ranges57.

Limitations for cell exposure at the ALI

The in-vitro model used during our experiments, although largely accepted48,62 as relevant for assessing airborne contaminants’ hazards and toxicity, still presents some limitations. The model is representative of the bronchial space in proximity to the alveolar space, and far from the histological complexity of the upper respiratory tract with cylindrical or pseudostratified epithelial cells. Moreover, lung homeostasis relies on the interplay of different cell types (such as mucus or surfactant-producing cells, macrophages, and other immune cells) and the possible combined effect of different cell types should be considered in the future. The interaction of particles with lung epithelia is driven, among other factors, by the presence of the lung fluid which can activate or de-activate particle bounded chemicals63 . In our study, we did not add a lung fluid-mimicking solution. The lack of lung fluid in our model may have affected the responses of the cells but the direction of this modification (increased or decreased responses) could not be defined considering the actual understanding of the interaction between PM and the lung fluid and should be investigated in detail in future research. The limitation of the biological replicates is in our opinion a possible confounding factor in our experiments. The robustness of the exposure module, in terms of even distribution of the sampled particles, is high enough to avoid intra-experiment bias, but a wider battery of biological replicates should be envisaged in future experiments to properly account for the biological variability of the intra-experiments results. Our previous experiments37 showed however minor variation between intra-experiments biological replicates.

Biological endpoints

The expression of oxidative (HMOX-1 ) and inflammatory (CXCL-8) genes was quantified after 24 h of exposure. These genes were presented in a previous paper35.

Among the inflammatory mediators, whose release may be triggered by the inhalation of particulate matter, the available literature suggests that CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL)8 is a highly important one37,51,52.

The Heme oxygenase (HMOX-1 ) was selected as a significant biomarker of exposure, being related to the antioxidant response pathway. Indeed, HMOX-1 has been often used in literature, known to be highly responsive to oxidative stress and to play a protective role in response to several stressors43,49,50,64. A specific discussion for gene selection is beyond the scope of this paper. The following forward and reverse primers were selected to analyze the expression of the selected genes: HMOX-1 forward CAACAAAGTGCAAGATTCTGCC and reverse TGGCATAAAGCCCTACAGCA; CXCL-8 forward GAAGTTTTTGAAGAGGGCTGAGA and reverse CACTGGCATCTTCACTGATTCT.

Significant differences were observed in the expression of the two genes during the different exposure days with a general higher expression in winter than in summer35.

Aerosol oxidative potential

OP

During the RHAPS experiment the aerosol oxidative potential was measured by the most used methods for OP3032,65 : dithiothreitol (DTT), ascorbic acid (AA), and the 2,7-dichlorofluorescin (DCFH) assays . The DTT was used on both quartz and Teflon filters. The aim of these acellular assays is to provide a proxy for the oxidative capacity of PM samples. Among these methods, only the “total DTT” on quartz filters31 showed statistical association with HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 gene expression (Fig. S1 in the SI Appendix). We therefore refer only to “total DTT” OP31 in the current work. We refer to the SI Appendix, paragraph 1, for a discussion on the limitations and strengths of the different assays.

A sampling line based on quartz fiber filters was devoted to the OP determination on the soluble and total fraction of PM1 by the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay. The adopted procedures are those by31 for the total OP and for WSOP by66,67. Filter portions were extracted in deionized water by gentle shaking (30 min). The quartz fiber filter aliquots were not removed from the extraction solution after the end of the extraction procedure, and they were kept in the primary vial while performing the DTT assay. This was intended to allow both soluble (in the extract) and insoluble (attached to the filter) aerosol components to react with the DTT.

The mass of PM collected on the filters was largely sufficient throughout the monitoring period to obtain OP values above the detection limits35 for most of the DTT measurements (as well as for AA and DCFH measurements). The daily mass of PM collected on filter membranes varied from 0.1 to 1.5 mg per filter with an average value of 0.5 ± 0.3 mg over the entire monitoring period (including both summer and winter), the amount of dust collected was, therefore, sufficient to obtain measurements of OP above the detection limits for more than 90% of the analytical determinations.

Particle-bound ROS

An online (2-h time resolution) cell-free system was used for the assessment of the particle-bound ROS30,68. A particle-into-liquid sampler (PILS) allowed for the continuous aerosol collection of a diluted solution of soluble species with suspended insoluble particles.

Ambient air was sampled at the flow rate of 15 L min-1. The sampling line was equipped with a PM1 inlet and a denuder line to keep acid and basic gasses out of the sample. Samples were analyzed through the 2,7 dichlorofluorescein (DCFH) assay. Data were converted to units of nmol H2O2 equivalents. Particle-bound ROS concentrations are reported as nmol H2O2 equivalents during the 2-h sampling intervals normalized to the volume of air sampled by the instrument during the 2-h interval, presented here as volume-normalized levels (in units of nmol H2O2 m-3 of air). Also, these were normalized to the PM1 mass (μg of PM1) measured during the same 2-h period (μg m-3 multiplied by the volume in m-3 of air sampled by the instrument during the same 2 h) and presented here as mass-normalized values (in units of nmol H2O2 μg-1 of PM1 mass).

We reckon that this technique does not guarantee the complete recovery of small and hydrophobic particles because particle growth is achieved through water condensation.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using R programming version 3.2.4 (http://www.R-project.org; Te R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Figure 1 shows the scatter-plot matrix and related correlations between a selected subset of atmospheric aerosol properties and toxicological markers of the inflammatory and oxidative response. The entire list of correlations can be found in SI Appendix, Figs. S1S6 and Table S2, including water-soluble and total OP by different assays (dithiothreitol (DTT), ascorbic acid (AA), 2,7-dichlorofluorescin (DCFH)), mass concentration of insoluble and water-soluble metals (Al, As, Ba, Bi, Cd, Ce, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Fe, Ga, K, La, Li, Mn, Mo, Na, Pb, Rb, Sb, Sn, Ti, Tl, U, V, W, Zn, and Zr), non-refractory PM1 components (nitrates, ammonium, sulfates, chloride and organic aerosol primary and secondary components derived from aerosol mass spectrometric (AMS) measurements), Poly-Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), particle number size distributions for diameters ranging from 8 nm to 1000 nm, and gaseous compounds (ozone and NO2). No correlation was found between control gene expression and Ozone and NO2 concentration (SI Appendix, Table S2). Among all data analyzed, only variables reported in Fig. 1 showed statistically significant associations with the biological responses for oxidative stress and inflammation (Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients (R2, and ρ2, respectively) are given with relevant significance levels (p-value)). Columns 15-16 of Fig. 1 indicate the fold change in gene expression patterns for HMOX-137,43,49,50, and CXCL-837,51,52, respectively. Columns from 6 to 8 show three emerging metrics for monitoring, PM1 and BC mass concentration, and the total number concentration (Nt).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Statistics for comparison between atmospheric aerosol properties and related pro-inflammatory and oxidative endpoints. Paired scatterplot matrix shows 24-h data for variables related to bulk aerosol (PM1, and BC mass concentration, and total number concentration, Ntot); the Condensation Sink (CS) as a function of particle size, in the nucleation, Aitken, soot, condensation and larger accumulation mode (CS8-20, CS20-40,CS40-100, CS100-200, CS200-900, see “Method” Section); aerosol type (number concentration of nucleation mode particles, N8-20, BC-to-OA ratio, and insoluble Copper mass concentration (Cu)); both water-soluble and total aerosol oxidative potential (DTT activity of PM1 samples); gene expression for oxidative stress (fold change for HMOX-1 and inflammation (fold change for CXCL-8). Statistical correlation values is shown in the box as Pearson correlation (R2), and Spearman correlation (ρ2), with the relative significance level (p-value). The color gradient is proportional to the Pearson correlation coefficient, R (red for positive R, blue for negative R). The number of points (n) to calculate correlations is 16, except for DCFH where n = 8. Created in R-Studio version 2022.12.0 using ggpairs function from the GGally package version 2.1.2.

Columns from 1 to 5 show the Condensation Sink (CS)4042 as a function of particle size, in the nucleation (8–20 nm), Aitken (20–40 nm), soot (40–100 nm), condensation (100–200 nm), and larger accumulation mode (200–900 nm), i.e. CS8-20, CS20-40,CS40-100, CS100-200, CS200-900. The CS is a well-known indicator of how rapidly a molecule condenses on preexisting aerosols, an important factor controlling new particle formation events, also in urban environments40,41. The CS increases with increasing particle diameter and number concentration (Eq. 1), and is higher, especially for particles in the accumulation mode size range. These particles cause most of the PM1 mass, owing to the large correlation between CS200-900 and PM1. There is a positive statistically correlation between CS8-20 and HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 gene expression. Figure 1 shows non-linear CR functions among both PM1 and BC mass concentrations and both CXCL-8 and HMOX-1 gene expression. For Nt, there is a positive correlation with CXCL-8, not statistically significant with HMOX-1 (p-value>0.2). Columns from 9 to 11 show three parameters, interrelated to each other: BC-to-OA ratio, insoluble copper mass concentration (Cu), and number concentration of particles in the size range 8–20 nm (N8-20). The BC-to-OA ratio has already been used in laboratory studies to separate fresh (high BC-to-OA) from aged (low BC-to-OA) combustion emissions69,70, and in the ambient atmosphere to separate fresh from aged aerosols71. There is a positive significant correlation between BC-to-OA and HMOX-1, but not statistically significant with CXCL-8 (p> 0.2). The N8-20 shows a positive correlation with both HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 (p-value <0.05). This is not the case for the number concentrations of larger particles, as observed in the size ranges of 40–100 nm, 100–200 nm, and 200–900 nm (SI Appendix, Figs. S4, S6). These size ranges resulted from statistical analysis of particle number size distributions (PNSDs) (“Materials and methods” section), indicating N8-20 to proxy an aerosol type with monomodal PNSD in the nucleation mode, occurring essentially at the daytime of the working days after the traffic rush hours. The insoluble Cu, which is known as a redox-active component in the fine particulate matter and in nanoparticles7275, shows a statistically significant positive relationship with both HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 gene expression. No similar relation was found with all the other metals here measured (Si Appendix, Figs. S2, S3). There is a correlation between insoluble Cu mass concentration and N8-20 and CS8-20. Columns 12–14 of Fig. 1 show the Oxidative potential (OP). The OP is expressed as total and water-soluble DTT activity (nmol DTT min-1 m-3) of PM1 sample (procedures by31 for the total OP, and by66,67 for WSOP, details in “Methods” section). We show also the total intrinsic DTT activity (DTTm in nmol DTT min-1 μg-1). The strongest significant positive correlation for HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 is observed with the total DTT (on a per volume basis, DTTv), with lower correlations with the water-soluble DTT. No similar association was found with the other OP assays observed in this study (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). The total DTT correlates with insoluble Cu, BC-to-OA, particle number concentration (more than with particle mass concentration), and the CS in both the accumulation and nucleation mode particles, while no similar relation with UFPs appears for the water-soluble DTT.

Higher R2 in Fig. 1 contemporarily for both HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 were found for the total DTT activity, on a per volume basis (R2 of approx. 0.5 with HMOX-1 and 0.6 with CXCL-8) and insoluble Cu (R2 of approx.0.4), and the CS and number concentration of nucleation mode particles (R2 of approx.0.3). In Fig. 2 we show the related scatterplots (HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 against the number concentrations and CS of nucleation mode particles (panels A-B, and panels C-D) and the insoluble Copper (panels E-F) and total OP as total DTT activity (panels G-H)), with the indication of 95% confidence interval, standard deviation error bars, and the date of measurements (dd/m). The stronger correlation with HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 found for the total DTT than for the insoluble Cu points to contributions to OP from chemical species other than transition metals and probably accounted for by (unspeciated) organic compounds. Overall, the positive correlations between HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 with the microphysical and chemical aerosol properties are only moderately strong, which is expected because the actual mechanisms leading to the biological response are probably influenced by combinations of factors. As a first attempt to probe possible synergic effects from multiple aerosol properties, we performed a simple multi-linear correlation analysis (SI Appendix, Fig. S9). This shows that the highest correlation factor, with approx. R2 = 0.7 (70% of explained variance) for both HMOX-1 and CXCL-8, is associated with a linear combination of the total OP (as total DTT) and the condensation sink (CS), with a negative coefficient for the CS if in the accumulation mode (CS200-800). This negative contribution for CS200-800 appears in Fig. 1, showing that while the per-volume DTT activity increases with both the CS8-20 and CS200-800, the per-mass DTT exhibits a negative correlation with CS200-800.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Relationships between atmospheric aerosol properties and oxidative capacity, and pro-inflammatory and oxidative markers. The number concentration of nanoparticles N8-20 (panels A, B), Condensation Sink of nanoparticles CS8-20 (panels C, D), insoluble Copper (Cu) mass concentration (panels E, F), and (G, H) total oxidative potential (DTT activity of PM1 samples) is presented against the fold change (f.c.) in gene expression for HMOX-1 (oxidative stress) and CXCL-8 (inflammation). Data points are indicated with standard deviation error bars. Linear regression lines are indicated with a 95% confidence interval (dashed ribbons), and relevant date of measurements (dd/m).

In Fig. 3 we explore the mechanisms linking aerosol microphysics and OP to HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 at timescales shorter then 24 h. We show a 10-min time series of N8-20 (primary y-axis) together with the CS of the accumulation mode particles (marker color). These are plotted against 24-h data of HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 (black and grey lines, secondary y-axes) and the total OP (as DTT activity, black dotted lines). In this study, the DTT assay was applied only to time-integrated (24 h) samples, but we make use of the fast (2-h integrated) measurements (using the DCFH assay, details in “Methods” section), a measure for particle-bound ROS concentration30, to gain further insight into the relationship involving ROS. These (when available) are also displayed as red dotted lines (as mass-normalized particle-bound ROS concentration, positively associated with HMOX-1, SI Appendix, Fig. S10; consistent patterns for the ROS concentration on a per volume basis are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S11). Daily reference values for PM2.5 are indicated in the top, while PM1 is indicated in SI Appendix, Table S1. We can observe that the days with low PM2.5 concentrations and high gene expressions (26 Jan and 16 Feb, cf. Fig. 2) are characterized by high N8-20 and low CS200-800, and high total DTT. Conversely, days with high PM2.5 concentrations and total DTT (28 Jan, 29 Jan, 17 Feb, 18 Feb) but high CS200-800, show low HMOX-1 and CXCL-8. As well, days with high N8-20 but low total DTT (in the summer period, 29 June, 1 and 2 July) are characterized by low gene expression. Another feature that can be observed in Fig. 3 is that the days with high total DTT activity are characterized also by high particle-bound ROS concentration, with the latter showing peaks at times of the day when CS200-800 is minimum. On 16 Feb, in particular, the mass-normalized particle-bound ROS concentrations reached the highest values of the campaign in the central hours of the day, when CS200-800 was low. Similar but smaller features were found around midday on 17 and 19 Feb, while the period of 2 to 6 Feb shows larger variability, but with a peak of the particle-bound ROS in the morning of 2 Feb whit CS200-800 again very small.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Temporal variability of atmospheric aerosol properties relevant for the pro-inflammatory and oxidative endpoints. The 10-min time series of the number concentration of nanoparticles (N8-20) is indicated on the left primary y-axis. Data points are colored by the condensation sink of accumulation mode particles (CS200-800). The 24-h data for HMOX-1 (black line) and CXCL-8 (grey line) f.c. gene expression is indicated on the secondary right y axes. The 24-h data of the aerosol oxidative potential (DTT activity in PM1 quartz samples) is indicated (dotted black line) on the secondary right y-axis. The 2-h data of particle-bound ROS (as PM1 mass-normalized values) is displayed on the secondary left axis (dotted red line). The 24-h values of PM2.5 mass concentration (μg·m-3) measured by the local environmental agency are indicated at the top of the plots. Note the parallel gene up-regulation on: Jan 26 (HMOX-1 f.c.=3.51±0.18 with p<0.01, CXCL-8 f.c.=1.18±0.08 but p> 0.05); Feb 16 (HMOX-1 f.c.=3.00±0.10 with p< 0.01, CXCL-8 f.c.=1.47±0.15 with p<0.05); Jan 28 (HMOX-1 f.c.=1.78±0.05 with p< 0.01, CXCL-8 f.c.=1.09±0.01 with p<0.01); Feb 04 (HMOX-1 f.c.=1.30±0.06 with p< 0.01, CXCL-8 f.c.=1.20±0.03 with p< 0.01). On Feb 03, there is data missing: (i) from h 09:06 to h 12:45 cells’ exposure was discontinued due to the activation of a diesel generator, and the line is thinner; (ii) from h 15:00 to 20:00 the OA data is missing and the marker color is grey.

Discussion

In this study, we show novel data based on a methodology recently developed36,37,54 to reduce artifacts for exposure of lung epithelial cells to the urban UFP-rich aerosol in the ambient air. This allows assessing also exposure to low doses of PM1, for which there is a paucity of data in the literature7,8. Oxidative stress and inflammation gene expression (HMOX-1 and CXCL8) are assessed in BEAS-2B cells exposed at the ALI to the urban aerosol. Our data show higher HMOX-1 and CXCL8 for higher levels of the total OP (traced by total = soluble and insoluble DTT activity) with a high content of insoluble Cu, coupled to higher nanoparticle levels (N8-20 and CS8-20) and low CS of accumulation mode particles ( CS200-800).

We offer possible explanations for these findings in Fig. 4. We propose the interplay between the CS and the OP as a conceptual model to assess oxidative stress and inflammation. In Fig. 4, the urban fresh aerosol features high redox-active components and particle-bound ROS (total OP) enriched in nanoparticles with low amounts of larger preexisting accumulation mode particles (low CS200-800). This may occur in urban areas at the rush hour on a winter weekday, after bad weather conditions. Bad weather conditions, with rain and strong winds, would favor a lowering of the accumulation mode particles, and hence a lowering of the PM1 mass concentration. At rush hour on a winter weekday, traffic emissions are typically abundant in urban areas. These conditions, being coupled together, would favor the increase of high redox-active components and particle-bound ROS enriched in nanoparticles, with low PM1. The low value of the CS200-800 is indicative of an atmospheric aerosol where condensable compounds (including ROS) do not sink rapidly on preexisting accumulation mode particles, and are rather scavenged by ultrafine particles.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Hypothesis on the relationships between atmospheric aerosols and biological endpoints. Considering the urban atmosphere, we hypothesize three major aerosol types: the aerosol from regional new particle formation (NPF) events, as shown in the top left side; the urban fresh aerosol (high BC-to-OA), as shown in the top center side; and the urban aged aerosols (low BC-to-OA), as shown in the top right side. These are parametrized by the combination of Condensation sink and the Oxidative Potential, in the top right side of each box. Also, the expected values of the Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), particle diameter (dp), and number concentration of nucleation mode particles (N20), total particles (Ntot) and PM2.5 are indicated. In-vitro responses of lung epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) exposed at the air-liquid interface (ALI) directly in the environment (mimicking the human exposure by inhalation) to this aerosol are analyzed by the anti-oxidant defense (HMOX-1) and anti-inflammatory (CXCL-8) gene expression in BEAS-2B cells directly exposed at the Air Liquid Interface in the atmosphere. Created with BioRender.com.

We provide a possible explanation of how the CS and the concentration of redox-active compounds (like insoluble copper) and nanoparticles may interact to affect oxidative stress and inflammations. Once the condensed redox-active organic compounds become enriched in nanoparticles that already contain reactive compounds like trace metals (Cu), they can exert a stronger toxicological response, as compared to their same content in different forms (e.g., same redox-active compounds but in accumulation mode particles, associated with higher CS ). This mechanism would be consistent with the Trojan-horse mechanism already reported for nanoparticles associated with heavy metal constituents16,22,23, that were found to have higher toxic responses as compared to exposure to the same metal mass in an ionic form and/or in macroscopic particles. Relevant processes may include increased nanoparticle mobility, lung deposition efficiency, and ability of nanoparticles to cross cell membranes16,22,23.

We note that the DTT activity can be augmented by the condensation of reactive species from the gas phase (such as quinones and other secondary organic compounds). Higher CS values translate to higher PM1 values, and therefore higher values of the volume-based OP32 . However, in our experiment, a higher intrinsic total DTT activity was found for nucleation mode particles (Fig. 1). These nanoparticles have indeed a higher deposition efficiency in the lungs38213911. Therefore, condensation occurring upon nanoparticles (at low PM1) might lead to higher gene expression values for HMOX-1 and CXCL-8. Such an effect contributes to explaining why a decrease in PM1 air concentrations might not translate into a reduction of toxicity. The urban fresh aerosol represents this aerosol type with higher numbers of these specific nanoparticles with high total OP, associated with higher inflammatory and oxidative biomarkers. For comparison, we indicate in Fig. 4 an urban aged aerosol (lower BC-to-OA) and larger particle diameters (larger total CS). This would represent a condition typically occurring in urban areas during winter “stable weather” days. Under these conditions, aerosol typically accumulates in the urban atmosphere, and hence particle aging is favored. As a third exemplary case, we indicate nucleation mode particles, which are low in the CS200-800, but have a lower OP, sourced by processes other than combustion-related ones. This is a condition typically occurring in the summer season at rural locations, where regional new particle formation may occur.

This is discussed in the following paragraphs in coherence with established literature, with some implications in the use of OP as control variables in health studies, and of PM1 as an indicator of oxidative stress and inflammation. Although novel data are presented in our study, results are consistent with recent literature7,8,12,13,16,22,23,26,28,43,44,49,50,7284. Epidemiological studies have already called for possible health effects at low doses, although toxicological studies at low PM1 are scarce7,8,12,13,76,77. Laboratory/modeling experiments have already indicated a number of aerosol properties connected to oxidative stress and inflammation, including the OP28 and UFPs8, although experimental data directly in the atmosphere at low PM1 and compared to gene expression patterns are scarce. Consistency may be found between our results and this body of literature indicating as key factors the decreasing particle size43,50,78, certain metals - especially copper - enriched in nanoparticles16,22,23,7275, the bulk particles per sè43,49,50, specific molecules over particle surface26,44 and/or into the bulk in association with a specific phase state7982, certain gaseous compounds around the particles44,82,83, anthropogenic sources78,84, organic coatings on the BC particles and atmospheric aging of the aerosol78, and/or the combination of all of these factors (summarized in SI Appendix, Table S3).

Different types of nanoparticles have different toxicities

Consistent with previous studies38,39,43,50,78, our data point at the relevance of particle size in the generation of inflammatory and oxidative responses. The role of particle size is emphasized in this study by the methodology adopted. We measured UFPs properties online (no filter collection) and associated these to toxicological markers measured through an exposure module where not all particle sizes penetrate with the same efficiency (mimicking the lung): not all particle sizes, but only those of particles deposited at the ALI upon cells contribute to the resulting dose and the toxicological marker3739,43,78. On the other side, data also highlight that particle size alone is not sufficient to characterize these toxicological markers. That is to say that not all nanoparticles should have the same toxicity.

Complex trends for N8-20 were observed during our experiment, with higher number concentrations during traffic rush hours, as well as at other hours of the day and during weekends, and during likely regional NPF events. Clearly, not all particles with a diameter less than 20 nm belong to the urban fresh aerosol. We found (Fig. 3) higher HMOX-1 and CXCL8 only when N8-20 is associated with high total OP (DTT activity) with both low CS200-900 and high insoluble Cu (the features of the urban fresh aerosol in Fig. 4). These nucleation mode particles, observed for example on 26/01, but also on 16/02 (Fig. 3, and SI Appendix, Fig. S7, S8) persisted for a few hours but didn’t grow to form the typical banana-shape, the lack of which is usually a signature of particle formation processes that are not regional New Particle Formation, NPF40. Particle growth above 30–40 nm is less common in urban-type nucleation events, constrained in the late afternoon by the availability of solar radiation intensity and by the increased urban CS200-900 (due to traffic-emitted particles in the evening).

The available literature43,53,83,85,86 suggests that toxicologically active nanoparticles at urban sites may originate from both road transportation emissions and photochemically induced particle formation (i.e., photochemical oxidation of vehicular exhaust products yielding precursors for nucleation). Interestingly, not all the organic species of diesel exhaust particles have been found to be able to trigger inflammatory responses (comprised CXCL-8 and HMOX-1 upregulation) in exposed cells87. Studies targeting fresh combustion particles have shown that high HMOX-1 values were associated with small soot particles due to their higher reactivity caused by their highly disordered internal structure43. With respect to photonucleation, high oxidation potential in the aerosol can be associated with short-lived free radicals, the occurrence of which has been demonstrated for the nanoparticles produced by the oxidation as furfural83. Noticeably, furan compounds can be formed by gas-phase reactions of hydrocarbons from gasoline and diesel emissions88.

Therefore, our findings suggest that it would be of great interest, in the future, to assess toxicity and detailed features of urban nanoparticles associated with a higher total DTT activity, and e.g. containing specific metals, such as Cu, and certain classes of reactive organic molecules, in the ambient air, at low PM1 mass concentrations16,22,23,72,75,80,89.

On the differential expression of the HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 genes

According to the specificity of the two genes analyzed, it should be kept in mind that HMOX-1 is a gene often activated under a wide range of stressful conditions90 and that the transcription factor, Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), regulates the expression of proteins functionally related to detoxification91 such as those in the antioxidant responsive elements, is responsible for the induction of HMOX-1 transcription92. This activation is usually rapid and increased HMOX-1 expression have been reported with a very short delay after (tens of minutes to few hours) cell treatments93,94. Moreover, HMOX-1 has been recognized to be involved in controlling and eventually resolving inflammation95. On the contrary, CXCL-8 gene expression depends on a sequence of biochemical events, usually starting from the activation of membrane receptors (toll-like receptors TLRs), that trigger the translocation of transcription factors into the nucleus and start gene transcription96, although TLRs independent stressors may induce upregulation of CXCL-897.

Significantly for our experiments, the two genes taken together ideally represent two interconnected and, partially, consecutive steps of response of the lung epithelium to stress stimuli58, although specific insults may activate one or the other gene transcription independently. In fact, HMOX-1 may precede and regulate inflammatory genes expression98 under stress conditions, although early CXCL-8 upregulation is reported for crystalline silica particles99 in the absence of a related HMOX-1 increased expression. In fact, the transcription of CXCL-8 has been reported as a marker of inflammation and inflammatory diseases in the lungs100.

The differential expression of the two genes here reported is therefore related to the timing of expression of the two genes, considering also a strict interplay between different cellular response pathways, or to the response of the cells to specific stressors that activate response pathways leading to one or the other gene expression.

Finally, the expression of the HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 genes may be of relevance in explaining some of the lung diseases associated to PM exposure. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) approach in fact identifies the activation of oxidative and inflammatory responses in relation to lung diseases, such as lung carcinogenicity after nanoparticles exposure101 or COPD after cigarette smoke102 or lung fibrosis103. Our results, according to the reported AOPs link PM exposure also at really low concentrations to activation of key events that may lead to an adverse outcome in the lungs. Although further experiments are needed, the results here reported allow to define significant toxicological hazard of PM at concentrations usually considered as of not hazardous. Our results therefore suggest that new possible air quality guidelines should take into consideration new metrics and thresholds that are far below the ones in force so far

The BC-to-OA ratio as an indicator of fresh combustion aerosols in the atmosphere

Even though the BC-to-OA presents lower predictive capacity than the “total DTT” and UFPs for HMOX-1, and even less for CXCL-8, it shows a certain correlation to the total DTT, the insoluble Cu, and N8-20 (Fig. 1). Notably, the BC-to-OA can be derived by measurements that are more suitable for long-term and highly time- and spatial-resolved observations as compared to the OP and UFPs. Hence, it can be useful for monitoring purposes.

The BC-to-OA ratio was introduced as a proxy of combustion conditions69, with high BC-to-OA ratios indicating that combustion conditions are conducive to BC formation. The values of the BC-to-OA ratios observed in the current study (<0.5) refer to urban air mixtures, i.e. with both fossil fuel and biomass-burning aerosols. Interestingly, these do not necessarily translate into high BC (and/or EC) mass concentrations (Fig. S12 in SI Appendix shows that BC mass concentration being the same, the BC-to-OA ratio increases with decreasing dp).

Based on our findings and on previous studies49,6971,104, here we interpret higher BC-to-OA ratios in the urban atmosphere as a rough indication of the availability in the atmosphere of combustion aerosols that have not had a long time to react and age in the atmosphere (less than one or a very few hours) and hence may be rich in redox-active components and particle-bound ROS in nanoparticles. Therefore, we suggest that fresh urban aerosols (as per Fig.4) may be initially identified by higher BC-to-OA ratios in the urban background. A number of factors, however, need to be clarified to understand a possible link between the BC-to-OA ratio and the OP and UFPs, as observed in Fig. 1. Key aspects include the enrichment of reactive organic compounds (like PAHs and their oxidation products) and of transition metals (our findings point particularly at the insoluble copper and its possible role for ROS formation), as well as the viscosity and physical state of these nanoparticles in the atmosphere72,73,7982,89,104.

The condensation sink in the atmosphere may influence ROS

Data show that an urban atmosphere with a low CS200-900 can enhance the pro-inflammatory and anti-oxidant potency of the fine atmospheric aerosol. The ability of CS200-900 to modulate gene expression patterns may be exemplary observed on 26, 27, 28 and 29 January in Fig. 3. We explain in Fig. 4 the influence of the CS200-900 with different effects.

The availability of larger particles (high dp and high CS200-900, Eq. 1) would suppress the traffic-related nucleation events, and the growth of the newly formed (fresh) particles. Pre-existing (larger) accumulation mode particles, if available, would favor the scavenging of available reactive gas phase compounds in virtue of their large surface area. This would suppress both their gas-to-particle conversion and/or their condensation upon smaller (more efficiently deposited in the lung) particles. Indeed, in a number of previous studies, low condensation sink has been found to favor particle formation40,41. A low CS200-900 in the atmosphere can therefore modulate the interplay between specific toxic molecules and traffic-related nucleation mode particles, which are more efficiently lung deposited.

We believe that the role of the CS200-900 in modulating inflammation and oxidative responses here may be linked also to the fact that high concentrations of preexisting particles can act as a condensation sink for the ROS molecules. We may interpret the CS200-900 as an indicator of how rapidly ROS molecules are scavenged by preexisting larger aerosol particles, which have a lower lung deposition efficiency. This is supported by the inverse relation between CS200-900 and the particle-bound ROS (Fig.3). Given the relationship between the CS and dp (Eq. 1), we interpret a low CS200-900 value as an increased possibility for a ROS molecule to be bound on nanoparticles. Further mechanisms linked to the chemistry of nanoparticles may be relevant.

To what degree PM1 mass and OP relate to the observed oxidative stress and inflammation

Regression lines in Fig. 1 provide evidence of non-linear effects between PM1 mass concentration and both HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 gene expression patterns. In Fig. 5 we show as these relations are modulated by the values of CS200-900 and OP. PM1 mass being the same, both HMOX-1 and CXCL-8 f.c. increase with decreasing the CS200-900 and OP (Fig. 5C, D).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Concentration-response curves for PM1 mass concentration versus pro-oxidative and inflammation biomarkers. Gene expression patterns for HMOX-1 (indicative of oxidative stress, panel A) and CXCL-8 (indicative of inflammation, panel B) are indicated against PM1 mass concentration (x-axis). Data points are colored by the condensation sink, and sized by the aerosol Oxidative Potential (total DTT activity in PM1). The fitted regression lines are indicated with a 95% confidence interval (dashed ribbons). Data points are indicated with measurement date (dd/m), standard deviation error bars, and significance level of the biomarkers (** indicate p-value < 0.01, * indicates p-value < 0.05).

The larger PM1 mass concentrations (at least in our dataset) are mainly associated to a prevalence of the urban aged aerosol (Fig. 4). This is low in the BC-to-OA ratio (being aged), and high in the CS200-900 (due to the larger particle diameter), an argument for the low gene expression values observed. The total OP values may be high in this case, as observed on 29/01, 18/02, and 19/02, albeit the toxicological markers observed are low. At PM1 mass <10-20 μg m3, the urban aerosol is shortly aged in the atmosphere (higher BC-to-OA ratios) and dominated by smaller particles with a lower CS200-900: PM1 mass being the same, oxidative stress and inflammation gene expression values increase with increasing the total OP. Patterns among PM1 and toxicological markers show steeper slopes and higher values at lower PM1 mass concentrations, as well as a change of slope in the range of 10-20 μg m3. For PM1 mass concentration < 20 μg m3, a positive correlation between PM1 mass and CXCL-8 (and less significantly with HMOX-1) can be observed, not at higher loading. Most interestingly, such correlation is modulated by the combination of CS200-900 and OP (Figs. 5, and S12, SI).

Therefore, our analysis highlights that there is no single aerosol variable able to predict the overall complexity of the oxidative stress/inflammatory responses. However, we found that a combination of two aggregate indicators of aerosol physicochemical properties (the OP mainly for chemistry, the CS mainly for microphysics) may explain simultaneously most of the modulation of the two genes here observed taken together.

On the low PM1 mass concentration and low doses

Data of the current study were taken through a recently developed methodology to limit artifacts in lung exposure to urban UFPs in the atmosphere3537. Accordingly, we could cover the low range of PM1 concentrations (down to less than 2 μg m-3) reflecting the near - background global PM2.5 concentrations now addressed by the last WHO guidelines for outdoor PM2.58. This is the range where the understanding of the concentration-response relationship for PM2.5 and mortality remains incomplete because most of the literature is based on high PM2.5 concentrations7,8.

Our study suggests a model that may explain exposure to the PM2.5 in the urban environment, especially at low PM2.5 mass concentrations, and makes connections to recently found relationships in low-exposure cohorts, where similar findings are observed, but reasons are still to be found1,3,7,9,12,77

Consistent with the existing literature1,3,58,11,13,43,76,77,105, our findings indicate no basis to assume a PM1 mass concentration threshold below which neither HMOX-1 nor CXCL-8 are low: conversely, there is a significant probability of toxicological markers to be expressed at the very low doses of PM1 exposures if these are accompanied by high concentrations of ROS-rich UFPs. This may be the case of Copper, for which our analysis suggests a relation between insoluble Cu mass concentration, nanoparticles and the antioxidant gene HMOX-1 and the proinflammatory gene CXCL-8, which is stronger than that observed for other metals (Figs. S3–S4 in the SI). We may interpret the finding in coherence with recent literature demonstrating biological effects, in vitro and in vivo, stronger for Cu and Cu-doped nanoparticles (as compared to Fe), on both the antioxidant and the inflammatory response pathways, at low doses of exposure - as low as those observed here (hundreds of nanograms per square cm)74,75.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that urban nanoparticles enriched in the redox-active compounds traced by the “total DTT” assay (such as insoluble copper) may have high pro-inflammatory and oxidative responses at low PM1 concentrations (< 5 μg m-3). This could be associated with the enrichment in traffic-related nanoparticles of reactive compounds otherwise scavenged by larger particles (associated to higher PM1). In fact, these larger particles have a lower deposition efficiency in the lungs as compared to nanoparticles. We found no basis to assume a safe exposure limit for PM1 below which pro-inflammatory and oxidative responses are low. These findings support a new conceptual model contributing to explaining the mechanisms governing human exposure to ambient fine aerosol, especially at low doses. Possible explanations for PM1 concentration-response curves are obtained by involving the interplay between OP and CS. Once larger particles are low (lower PM1, and CS), the condensed redox-active organic compounds may become enriched in nanoparticles. When these nanoparticles are abundant and already contain reactive compounds like trace metals (Copper), the strongest toxicological response can be observed. A similar condition might typically occur in urban areas during the traffic rush hour of a winter weekday, immediately after bad weather conditions.

Among the implications of this work, there are recommendations for new air quality guidelines. Global efforts should go toward the refinement of actual air quality standards also at relatively low PM2.5 mass concentrations, a space where the urban nanoparticles may have a peculiar role. This study joins other previous studies that call for measuring aerosol physicochemical properties rather than just PM2.5 mass concentration7 , since these measurements may be more closely related to the actual biological outcomes. Air quality metrics should more closely proxy the specific aerosol features connected to relevant toxicological markers endpoints, rather than the bulk aerosol (i.e., total mass, total number concentration). We highlight the importance to consider the oxidative potential (“total DTT” assay) in PM1 to trace aerosol toxic effects, suitable for monitoring. We add to this the suggestion to consider the Condensation Sink as a function of particle size, as a new proxy for the ability of large particles to scavenge reactive compounds otherwise prompted to condense on ultrafine and nanoparticles, which efficiently deposit on alveolar tissues. Our results, finally, confirm the potential importance of having air quality metrics considering the air mixture properties, and specifically how redox-active compounds distribute in, and interact with, fine and ultrafine particles.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support of all the participants in the Redox-Activity and Health-Effects of Atmospheric Primary and Secondary Aerosol (RHAPS) project. The authors thank the Editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

Author contributions

F.C., M.G., S.D., R.V. designed the experiments; F.C. drafted the manuscript; M.G., S.D. revised the manuscript critically; F.C., M.R., M.P., G.D.I., S.D., analyzed aerosol data; M.R., M.P., L.D.L. performed aerosol experiments; M.G., E.C., analysed toxicological data; M.G. performed toxicological experiments; S.C., M.R., L.M. perfomed OP experiments and analysed OP data; all authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of the University (MIUR), Grant No. 2017MSN7M8, project Redox-Activity and Health-Effects of Atmospheric Primary and Secondary Aerosol (RHAPS).

Data availability

The datasets analysed during the current study are available in the RHAPS repository (https://campagne.isac.cnr.it/RHAPS/ [username: rhaps, password: qui3Ahz!]), and available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Francesca Costabile, Email: f.costabile@isac.cnr.it.

Maurizio Gualtieri, Email: maurizio.gualtieri@unimib.it.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-023-45230-z.

References

  • 1.Chen J, Hoek G. Long-term exposure to pm and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2020;143:105974. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Whitmee S, Haines A, Beyrer C, Boltz F, Capon AG, de Souza Dias BF, Ezeh A, Frumkin H, Gong P, Head P, et al. Safeguarding human health in the anthropocene epoch: Report of the rockefeller foundation-lancet commission on planetary health. Lancet. 2015;386(10007):1973–2028. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burnett R, Chen H, Szyszkowicz M, Fann N, Hubbell B, Pope Iii CA, Apte JS, Brauer M, Cohen A, Weichenthal S, et al. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018;115(38):9592–9597. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803222115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fuller R, et al. Pollution and health: A progress update. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2022 doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khomenko S, Cirach M, Pereira-Barboza E, Mueller N, Barrera-Gómez J, Rojas-Rueda D, de Hoogh K, Hoek G, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Premature mortality due to air pollution in european cities: A health impact assessment. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2021;5(3):e121–e134. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30272-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Danesh Yazdi M, Wang Y, Di Q, Wei Y, Requia WJ, Shi L, Sabath MB, Dominici F, Coull BA, Evans JS, et al. Long-term association of air pollution and hospital admissions among medicare participants using a doubly robust additive model. Circulation. 2021;143(16):1584–1596. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weichenthal S, Pinault L, Christidis T, Burnett RT, Brook JR, Chu Y, Crouse DL, Erickson AC, Hystad P, Li C, et al. How low can you go? Air pollution affects mortality at very low levels. Sci. Adv. 2022;8(39):eabo3381. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo3381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.WHO, WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2. 5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide, (2021). [PubMed]
  • 9.Chen J, Hoek G. Long-term exposure to pm and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2020;143:105974. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Park M, Joo HS, Lee A. Differential toxicities of fine particulate matters from various sources. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:17007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35398-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen H, Oliver BG, Pant A, Olivera A, Poronnik P, Pollock CA, Saad S. Effects of air pollution on human health-mechanistic evidence suggested by in vitro and in vivo modelling. Environ. Res. 2022;212:113378. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Strak, M. et al. Long term exposure to low level air pollution and mortality in eight european cohorts within the elapse project pooled analysis. bmj374, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Stafoggia M, et al. The BEEP Collaborative Group, Short-term effects of particulate matter on cardiovascular morbidity in Italy: A national analysis. Eur. J. Prevent. Cardiol. 2020;29(8):1202–1211. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kelly FJ, Fussell JC. Role of oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease outcomes following exposure to ambient air pollution. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017;110:345–367. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mudway IS, Kelly FJ, Holgate ST. Oxidative stress in air pollution research. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020;151:2–6. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ortega R, Bresson C, Darolles C, Gautier C, Roudeau S, Perrin L, Janin M, Floriani M, Aloin V, Carmona A, et al. Low-solubility particles and a trojan-horse type mechanism of toxicity: The case of cobalt oxide on human lung cells. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2014;11(1):1–18. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-11-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miller MR, Borthwick SJ, Shaw CA, McLean SG, McClure D, Mills NL, Duffin R, Donaldson K, Megson IL, Hadoke PW, et al. Direct impairment of vascular function by diesel exhaust particulate through reduced bioavailability of endothelium-derived nitric oxide induced by superoxide free radicals. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009;117(4):611–616. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oberdörster G, Sharp Z, Atudorei V, Elder A, Gelein R, Kreyling W, Cox C. Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain. Inhalation Toxicol. 2004;16(6–7):437–445. doi: 10.1080/08958370490439597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miller MR. The role of oxidative stress in the cardiovascular actions of particulate air pollution. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014;42(4):1006–1011. doi: 10.1042/BST20140090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Perez CM, Hazari MS, Farraj AK. Role of autonomic reflex arcs in cardiovascular responses to air pollution exposure. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2015;15(1):69–78. doi: 10.1007/s12012-014-9272-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Oberdörster G. Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 2000;74(1):1–8. doi: 10.1007/s004200000185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Limbach LK, Wick P, Manser P, Grass RN, Bruinink A, Stark WJ. Exposure of engineered nanoparticles to human lung epithelial cells: Influence of chemical composition and catalytic activity on oxidative stress. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41(11):4158–4163. doi: 10.1021/es062629t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grass RN, Limbach LK, Athanassiou EK, Stark WJ. Exposure of aerosols and nanoparticle dispersions to in vitro cell cultures: A review on the dose relevance of size, mass, surface and concentration. J. Aerosol Sci. 2010;41(12):1123–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mehta L, Kumari S, Singh RP. Carbon nanotubes modulate activity of cytotoxic compounds via a trojan horse mechanism. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2020;33(5):1206–1214. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Trevisan R, Uzochukwu D, Di Giulio RT. Pah sorption to nanoplastics and the trojan horse effect as drivers of mitochondrial toxicity and pah localization in zebrafish. Front. Environ. Sci. 2020;8:78. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.00078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Offer S, Hartner E, Di Bucchianico S, Bisig C, Bauer S, Pantzke J, Zimmermann EJ, Cao X, Binder S, Kuhn E, Huber A. Effect of atmospheric ageing on soot particle toxicity in lung cell models at the air liquid interface: Differential toxicological impacts of biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosols (soas) Environ. Health Perpect. 2022;130:2. doi: 10.1289/EHP9413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cohen AJ, Aron J. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: An analysis of data from the global burden of diseases study 2015. Lancet. 2017;389:1907–1918. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Daellenbach KR, Uzu G, Jiang J, et al. Sources of particulate-matter air pollution and its oxidative potential in europe. Nature. 2020;587:414–419. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2902-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Saffari A, Daher N, Shafer MM, Schauer JJ, Sioutas C. Global perspective on the oxidative potential of airborne particulate matter: A synthesis of research findings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48(13):7576–7583. doi: 10.1021/es500937x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bates JT, Fang T, Verma V, Zeng L, Weber RJ, Tolbert PE, Abrams JY, Sarnat SE, Klein M, Mulholland JA, et al. Review of acellular assays of ambient particulate matter oxidative potential: Methods and relationships with composition, sources, and health effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53(8):4003–4019. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b03430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gao D, Fang T, Verma V, Zeng L, Weber RJ. A method for measuring total aerosol oxidative potential (op) with the dithiothreitol (dtt) assay and comparisons between an urban and roadside site of water-soluble and total op. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2017;10(8):2821–2835. doi: 10.5194/amt-10-2821-2017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gao D, Mulholland JA, Russell AG, Weber RJ. Characterization of water-insoluble oxidative potential of pm2.5 using the dithiothreitol assay. Atmos. Environ. 2020;224:117327. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pai SJ, Carter TS, Heald CL, Kroll JH. Updated world health organization air quality guidelines highlight the importance of non-anthropogenic pm2.5. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2022 doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gabrys J. Planetary health in practice: Sensing air pollution and transforming urban environments. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2020;7(1):1–11. doi: 10.1057/s41599-020-00534-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Costabile F, Decesari S, Vecchi R, Lucarelli F, Curci G, Massabò D, Rinaldi M, Gualtieri M, Corsini E, Menegola E, et al. On the redox-activity and health-effects of atmospheric primary and secondary aerosol: Phenomenology. Atmosphere. 2022;13(5):704. doi: 10.3390/atmos13050704. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Costabile F, et al. First results of the carbonaceous aerosol in rome and environs (care) experiment: Beyond current standards for pm10. Atmosphere. 2017 doi: 10.3390/atmos8120249. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gualtieri M, et al. Is it the time to study air pollution effects under environmental conditions? a case study to support the shift of in vitro toxicology from the bench to the field. Chemosphere. 2018;207:552–564. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yeh H-C, Cuddihy RG, Phalen RF, Chang I-Y. Comparisons of calculated respiratory tract deposition of particles based on the proposed ncrp model and the new icrp66 model. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1996;25:134–140. doi: 10.1080/02786829608965386. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hofmann W. Modelling inhaled particle deposition in the human lung-a review. J. Aerosol Sci. 2011;42(10):693–724. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.05.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kulmala M, Petaia T, Nieminen T, Sipila M, Manninen HE, Lehtipalo K, Dal Maso M, Aalto P, Junninen H, Paasonen P, et al. Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles. Nat. Protoc. 2012;7:1651–1667. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Du W, Refsnes M, Totlandsdal A, Holme J, Schwarze P, Kulmala M. Influence of aerosol chemical composition on condensation sink efficiency and new particle formation in beijing. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2022;9:375–382. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dal Maso M, et al. Condensation and coagulation sinks and formation of nucleation mode particles in coastal and boreal forest boundary layers. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2002;107(D19):PAR-2. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jonsdottir HR, Delaval M, Leni Z, et al. Non-volatile particle emissions from aircraft turbine engines at ground-idle induce oxidative stress in bronchial cells. Commun Biol. 2019;2:90. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0332-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Han J, et al. Proteome-wide effects of naphthalene-derived secondary organic aerosol in beas-2b cells are caused by short-lived unsaturated carbonyls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2020;117:25386–25395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001378117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dusautoir R, Zarcone G, Verriele M, Garçon G, Fronval I, Beauval N, Allorge D, Riffault V, Locoge N, Lo-Guidice J-M, et al. Comparison of the chemical composition of aerosols from heated tobacco products, electronic cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes and their toxic impacts on the human bronchial epithelial beas-2b cells. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021;401:123417. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gonzalez-Rivera JC, Baldridge KC, Wang DS, Patel K, Chuvalo-Abraham JC, Hildebrandt Ruiz L, Contreras LM. Post-transcriptional air pollution oxidation to the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway promotes pulmonary stress phenotypes. Commun. Biol. 2020;3(1):392. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01118-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Atsuta J, Sterbinsky SA, Plitt J, Schwiebert LM, Bochner BS, Schleimer RP. Phenotyping and cytokine regulation of the beas-2b human bronchial epithelial cell: demonstration of inducible expression of the adhesion molecules vcam-1 and icam-1. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1997;17(5):571–582. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.17.5.2685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ghio AJ, Dailey LA, Soukup JM, Stonehuerner J, Richards JH, Devlin RB. Growth of human bronchial epithelial cells at an air-liquid interface alters the response to particle exposure. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2013;10(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-10-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yang J, et al. Physical, chemical, and toxicological characteristics of particulate emissions from current technology gasoline direct injection vehicles. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;650:1182–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Akhtar US, Rastogi N, Mcwhinney RD. The combined effects of physicochemical properties of size-fractionated ambient particulate matter on in vitro toxicity in human a549 lung epithelial cells. Hum. Nat. 2014;20:317–330. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.853801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Øvrevik J, Refsnes M, Totlandsdal A, Holme J, Schwarze P, Låg M. Tace/tgf-a/egfr regulates cxcl8 in bronchial epithelial cells exposed to particulate matter components. Eur. Respir. J. 2011;38:1189–1199. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00171110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zarcone M, Duistermaat E, van Schadewijk A, Jedynska A, Hiemstra P, Kooter I. Cellular response of mucociliary differentiated primary bronchial epithelial cells to diesel exhaust. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2016;311:L111–123. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00064.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Costabile F, Birmili W, Klose S, Tuch T, Wehner B, Wiedensohler A, Franck U, Konig K, Sonntag A. Spatiotemporal variability and principal components of the particle number size distribution in an urban atmosphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009;9:3163–3195. doi: 10.5194/acp-9-3163-2009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Costabile F, Gualtieri M, Canepari S, Tranfo G, Consales C, Grollino M, Paci E, Petralia E, Pigini D, Simonetti G. Evidence of association between aerosol properties and in-vitro cellular oxidative response to pm1, oxidative potential of pm2.5, a biomarker of rna oxidation, and its dependency on combustion sources. Atmos. Environ. 2019;213:444–455. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Whitby KT. Sulfur in the Atmosphere. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1978. The physical characteristics of sulfur aerosols; pp. 135–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hewitt RJ, Lloyd CM. Regulation of immune responses by the airway epithelial cell landscape. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021;21(6):347–362. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00477-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Aufderheide M, Heller W-D, Krischenowski O, Möhle N, Hochrainer D. Improvement of the cultex® exposure technology by radial distribution of the test aerosol. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2017;69(6):359–365. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2017.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gilmour MI, Jaakkola MS, London SJ, Nel AE, Rogers CA. How exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, outdoor air pollutants, and increased pollen burdens influences the incidence of asthma. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006;114(4):627–633. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pichavant M, Rémy G, Bekaert S, Le Rouzic O, Kervoaze G, Vilain E, Just N, Tillie-Leblond I, Trottein F, Cataldo D, et al. Oxidative stress-mediated inkt-cell activation is involved in copd pathogenesis. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7(3):568–578. doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Audureau É, Simon-Deckers A, Franco-Montoya M-L, Annangi B, Kermanizadeh A, Boczkowski J, Lanone S. Substantial modification of the gene expression profile following exposure of macrophages to welding-related nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26988-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Aufderheide M, Scheffler S, Möhle N, Halter B, Hochrainer D. Analytical in vitro approach for studying cyto-and genotoxic effects of particulate airborne material. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011;401(10):3213–3220. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5163-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Upadhyay S, Palmberg L. Air-liquidinterface: relevant in vitro models for investigating air pollutant-inducedpulmonarytoxicity. Toxicol. Sci. 2018;164(1):21–30. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang F, Liu J, Zeng H. Interactions of particulate matter and pulmonary surfactant: Implications for human health. Adv. Coll. Interface. Sci. 2020;284:102244. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Loboda A, Damulewicz M, Pyza E, Jozkowicz A, Dulak J. Role of nrf2/ho-1 system in development, oxidative stress response and diseases: An evolutionarily conserved mechanism. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016;73(17):3221–3247. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2223-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Molina C, Toro AR, Manzano CA, Canepari S, Massimi L, Leiva-Guzmán MA. Airborne aerosols and human health: Leapfrogging from mass concentration to oxidative potential. Atmosphere. 2020;11(9):917. doi: 10.3390/atmos11090917. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cho AK, Sioutas C, Miguel AH, Kumagai Y, Schmitz DA, Singh M, Eiguren-Fernandez A, Froines JR. Redox activity of airborne particulate matter at different sites in the los angeles basin. Environ. Res. 2005;99(1):40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2005.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Verma V, Ning Z, Cho AK, Schauer JJ, Shafer MM, Sioutas C. Redox activity of urban quasi-ultrafine particles from primary and secondary sources. Atmos. Environ. 2009;43(40):6360–6368. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Stevanovic S, et al. Diurnal profiles of particle-bound ros of pm2.5 in urban environment of hong kong and their association with pm2.5, black carbon, ozone and pahs. Atmos. Environ. 2019;219:117023. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Saleh R, Delaval N, Mcwhinney RD. Brownness of organics in aerosols from biomass burning linked to their black carbon content. Nat. Geosci. 2014;7:647–650. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pokhrel RP, Wagner NL, Langridge JM, Lack DA, Jayarathne T, Stone EA, Stockwell CE, Yokelson RJ, Murphy SM. Parameterization of single-scattering albedo (ssa) and absorption ångström exponent (aae) with ec/oc for aerosol emissions from biomass burning. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016;16(15):9549–9561. doi: 10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gilardoni S, Massoli P, Paglione M, Giulianelli L, Carbone C, Rinaldi M, Decesari S, Sandrini S, Costabile F, Gobbi GP, et al. Direct observation of aqueous secondary organic aerosol from biomass-burning emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2016;113(36):10013–10018. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602212113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lelieveld S, Wilson J, Dovrou E, Mishra A, Lakey PS, Shiraiwa M, Poschl U, Berkemeier T. Hydroxyl radical production by air pollutants in epithelial lining fluid governed by interconversion and scavenging of reactive oxygen species. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55(20):14069–14079. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lelieveld J, Poschl U. Chemists can help to solve the air-pollution health crisis. Nature. 2017;551(7680):291–293. doi: 10.1038/d41586-017-05906-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jing X, Park JH, Peters TM, Thorne PS. Toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in lung epithelial cells exposed at the air-liquid interface compared with in vivo assessment. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2015;29(3):502–511. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2014.12.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Tacu I, Kokalari I, Abollino O, Albrecht C, Malandrino M, Ferretti AM, Schins RPF, Fenoglio I. Mechanistic insights into the role of iron, copper, and carbonaceous component on the oxidative potential of ultrafine particulate matter. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2021;34(3):767–779. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chan YL, Wang B, Chen H, Ho KF, Cao J, Hai G, Jalaludin B, Herbert C, Thomas PS, Saad S, et al. Pulmonary inflammation induced by low-dose particulate matter exposure in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2019;317(3):L424–L430. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00232.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Stafoggia M, Oftedal B, Chen J, Rodopoulou S, Renzi M, Atkinson RW, Bauwelinck M, Klompmaker JO, Mehta A, Vienneau D, Andersen ZJ, Bellander T, Brandt J, Cesaroni G, de Hoogh K, Fecht D, Gulliver J, Hertel O, Hoffmann B, Hvidtfeldt UA, Jöckel K-H, Jørgensen JT, Katsouyanni K, Ketzel M, Kristoffersen DT, Lager A, Leander K, Liu S, Ljungman PLS, Nagel G, Pershagen G, Peters A, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Rizzuto D, Schramm S, Schwarze PE, Severi G, Sigsgaard T, Strak M, van der Schouw YT, Verschuren M, Weinmayr G, Wolf K, Zitt E, Samoli E, Forastiere F, Brunekreef B, Hoek G, Janssen NAH. Long-term exposure to low ambient air pollution concentrations and mortality among 28 million people: Results from seven large european cohorts within the elapse project. Lancet Planet. Health. 2022;6(1):e9–e18. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00277-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hakkarainen H, Salo L, Mikkonen S, Saarikoski S, Aurela M, Teinilä K, Ihalainen M, Martikainen S, Marjanen P, Lepistö T, Kuittinen N, Saarnio K, Aakko-Saksa P, Pfeiffer TV, Timonen H, Rönkkö T, Jalava PI. Black carbon toxicity dependence on particle coating: Measurements with a novel cell exposure method. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;838:156543. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Shiraiwa M, Li Y, Tsimpidi A, et al. Global distribution of particle phase state in atmospheric secondary organic aerosols. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15002. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Alpert PA, Dou J, Corral Arroyo P, et al. Photolytic radical persistence due to anoxia in viscous aerosol particles. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1769. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21913-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Huynh E, et al. Evidence for a semisolid phase state of aerosols and droplets relevant to the airborne and surface survival of pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2022;119(4):e2109750119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109750119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Huang Y. Coexistence of three liquid phases in individual atmospheric aerosol particles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2021;118:16. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102512118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Dultseva GG, Dubtsov SN, Dultsev FN, Kobzeva TV, Nekrasov DV. Analysis of the surface functional groups of organic nanoparticles formed in furfural vapour photonucleation using a rupture event scanning technique. Anal. Methods. 2017;9:5348–5355. doi: 10.1039/C7AY01437F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Leni Z, Cassagnes L, Daellenbach K, El Haddad I, Vlachou A, Uzu G, Prévôt A, Jaffrezo J, Baumlin N, Salathe M, Baltensperger U, Dommen J. Oxidative stress-induced inflammation in susceptible airways by anthropogenic aerosol. PLoS One 18. 2020;15(11):e0233425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Guo S, Hu M, Peng J, Wu Z, Zamora ML, Shang D, Du Z, Zheng J, Fang X, Tang R, et al. Remarkable nucleation and growth of ultrafine particles from vehicular exhaust. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2020;117(7):3427–3432. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916366117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Rönkkö T, Kuuluvainen H, Karjalainen P, Keskinen J, Hillamo R, Niemi JV, Pirjola L, Timonen HJ, Saarikoski S, Saukko E, et al. Traffic is a major source of atmospheric nanocluster aerosol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017;114(29):7549–7554. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700830114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Brinchmann BC, Skuland T, Rambøl MH, Szoke K, Brinchmann JE, Gutleb AC, Moschini E, Kubátová A, Kukowski K, Le Ferrec E, et al. Lipophilic components of diesel exhaust particles induce pro-inflammatory responses in human endothelial cells through ahr dependent pathway (s) Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2018;15(1):1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12989-018-0257-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lim YB, Ziemann PJ. Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol formation from oh radical-initiated reactions of linear, branched, and cyclic alkanes in the presence of no x. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2009;43(6):604–619. doi: 10.1080/02786820902802567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Al-Abadleh HA, Nizkorodov SA. Open questions on transition metals driving secondary thermal processes in atmospheric aerosols. Commun. Chem. 2021;4:176. doi: 10.1038/s42004-021-00616-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Funes SC, Rios M, Fernández-Fierro A, Covián C, Bueno SM, Riedel CA, Mackern-Oberti JP, Kalergis AM. Naturally derived heme-oxygenase 1 inducers and their therapeutic application to immune-mediated diseases. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:1467. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Jaiswal AK. Nrf2 signaling in coordinated activation of antioxidant gene expression. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004;36(10):1199–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.02.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Lee J-S, Surh Y-J. Nrf2 as a novel molecular target for chemoprevention. Cancer Lett. 2005;224(2):171–184. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.09.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Reichard JF, Motz GT, Puga A. Heme oxygenase-1 induction by nrf2 requires inactivation of the transcriptional repressor bach1. Nucl. Acids Res. 2007;35(21):7074–7086. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Grilli A, Bengalli R, Longhin E, Capasso L, Proverbio MC, Forcato M, Bicciato S, Gualtieri M, Battaglia C, Camatini M. Transcriptional profiling of human bronchial epithelial cell beas-2b exposed to diesel and biomass ultrafine particles. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4679-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Campbell NK, Fitzgerald HK, Dunne A. Regulation of inflammation by the antioxidant haem oxygenase 1. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021;21(7):411–425. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00491-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.El-Zayat SR, Sibaii H, Mannaa FA. Toll-like receptors activation, signaling, and targeting: An overview. Bull. Natl. Res. Centre. 2019;43(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s42269-019-0227-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Hoffmann E, Dittrich-Breiholz O, Holtmann H, Kracht M. Multiple control of interleukin-8 gene expression. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2002;72(5):847–855. doi: 10.1189/jlb.72.5.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Onyiah JC, Schaefer RE, Colgan SP. A central role for heme oxygenase-1 in the control of intestinal epithelial chemokine expression. J. Innate Immun. 2018;10(3):228–238. doi: 10.1159/000488914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Skuland T, Låg M, Gutleb AC, Brinchmann BC, Serchi T, Øvrevik J, Holme JA, Refsnes M. Pro-inflammatory effects of crystalline-and nano-sized non-crystalline silica particles in a 3d alveolar model. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2020;17(1):1–18. doi: 10.1186/s12989-020-00345-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Mukaida N. Pathophysiological roles of interleukin-8/cxcl8 in pulmonary diseases. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2003;284(4):L566–L577. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00233.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Nymark P, Karlsson HL, Halappanavar S, Vogel U. Adverse outcome pathway development for assessment of lung carcinogenicity by nanoparticles. Front. Toxicol. 2021;3:653386. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2021.653386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Xiong R, Wu Y, Wu Q, Muskhelishvili L, Davis K, Tripathi P, Chen Y, Chen T, Bryant M, Rosenfeldt H, et al. Integration of transcriptome analysis with pathophysiological endpoints to evaluate cigarette smoke toxicity in an in vitro human airway tissue model. Arch. Toxicol. 2021;95:1739–1761. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03008-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Makena P, Kikalova T, Prasad GL, Baxter SA. Oxidative stress and lung fibrosis: Towards an adverse outcome pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(15):12490. doi: 10.3390/ijms241512490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Saleh R. From measurements to models: Toward accurate representation of brown carbon in climate calculations. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2020;6(2):90–104. doi: 10.1007/s40726-020-00139-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Riva D, Magalhães C, Lopes A, Lanças T, Mauad T, Malm O, Valenca S, Saldiva P, Faffe D, Zin W. Low dose of fine particulate matter (pm2.5) can induce acute oxidative stress, inflammation and pulmonary impairment in healthy mice. Inhal. Toxicol. 2011;23(5):257–267. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2011.566290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analysed during the current study are available in the RHAPS repository (https://campagne.isac.cnr.it/RHAPS/ [username: rhaps, password: qui3Ahz!]), and available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES