Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
letter
. 2023 Nov 1;133(21):e175274. doi: 10.1172/JCI175274

Biosynthesis of glucocorticoids in tumors. Reply.

Matthew D Taves 1, Shizuka Otsuka 1, Jonathan D Ashwell 1,
PMCID: PMC10617765  PMID: 37909339

The authors reply: In a Letter to the Editor regarding our recent paper (1), Cirillo (2) challenged our conclusion that tumors produce glucocorticoids primarily via 11β-HSD1–mediated metabolite recycling rather than Cyp11b1-mediated de novo synthesis. Our responses to the main points follow.

De novo glucocorticoid synthesis by tumors is well-established. Although there is a literature showing tumor glucocorticoid production, the evidence that glucocorticoids are primarily synthesized de novo and in sufficient amounts to affect tumor immunity is not “solid.” In the review cited by Cirillo (3), we found three studies that directly demonstrated glucocorticoid synthesis by precursor (progesterone or 11-deoxycorticosterone [DOC]) conversion to glucocorticoids. In two studies this was quantified, and precursor conversion by human melanoma cell lines was negligible (<1%). This parallels our results with mouse melanoma cell lines. In contrast with Cyp11b1-mediated de novo synthesis, 11β-HSD1 efficiently converted dehydrocorticosterone (DHC) to glucocorticoids (100%). Most other studies examining extraadrenal glucocorticoid production (3) inferred that the glucocorticoids were synthesized de novo because production was prevented by the Cyp11b1 inhibitor metyrapone. However, metyrapone also inhibits 11β-HSD1 and cannot discriminate between synthesis and regeneration. Furthermore, even if de novo synthesis is detectable, without side-by-side comparison of Cy11b1 versus 11β-HSD1 activity their relative importance is unknown. We are unaware of such comparisons of tumor cells prior to our study, but in normal mouse skin (4) corticosterone production by 11β-HSD1 dwarfed that of Cyp11b1, as we observed.

Species differences might lead to misleading conclusions regarding human cancers. We agree that the mechanism of glucocorticoid production is important, and, therefore, we analyzed CYP11B1 (synthesis) and HSD11B1 (regeneration) expression in human cancers. HSD11B1 but not CYP11B1 was upregulated in multiple cancers and was widely and strongly associated with expression of glucocorticoid-responsive genes, regulatory T cell markers, and effector T cell exhaustion markers. This paralleled our findings in mice and strongly supports the notion that 11β-HSD1 (not Cyp11b1) produces biologically significant levels of cortisol in these human tumors, with a negative clinical impact. Our findings have been mirrored by those of another group independently converging on 11β-HSD1 as a target for cancer therapy, using mouse models and human cancer data sets (5).

De novo–synthesized corticosterone might have been produced but then converted to aldosterone by Cyp11b2. Cirillo supposes that the tumor cells we analyzed did synthesize corticosterone via Cyp11b1, but that it was all converted to aldosterone by coexpressed Cyp11b2. If this were true, the synthesized corticosterone would simply be an intermediary and transient metabolite, not a secreted bioactive product. More importantly, 11β-HSD1–generated corticosterone from the same cells would also have been depleted by conversion to aldosterone. This point exposes a self-contradiction in this model: efficient corticosterone conversion to aldosterone would preclude its detection from all sources. Nonetheless, we have tested this possibility and found that Cyp11b2 expression was extremely low in B16.F10 (B16) melanoma and MC38 colorectal tumor cells (Figure 1A). Although both converted DHC to corticosterone, neither converted DOC to corticosterone or aldosterone (Figure 1B), ruling out a role of Cyp11b2.

Figure 1. Glucocorticoid-producing enzyme expression in tumors.

Figure 1

(A) Relative Hsd11b1, Cyp11b1, and Cyp11b2 expression (corrected for Gapdh) in tumor cells was determined by reverse-transcription qPCR. (B) 2.5 × 104 tumor cells were cultured with 100 nM DOC or DHC for 24 hours, and steroids were assayed by ELISAs (Arbor Assays). (C) Relative gene expression in human cancers. TCGA gene expression data were analyzed using Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/), and median values are shown.

Our study does not contradict previous evidence of tumor synthesis of glucocorticoids. We did not claim that tumors can never synthesize biologically significant levels of glucocorticoids, and some certainly do (this clearly occurs with adrenal adenomas and, perhaps, murine AOM-DSS–induced colorectal tumors, ref. 6). However, for the seven glucocorticoid-producing tumor cells we examined, the amounts regenerated by 11β-HSD1 were vastly greater than those synthesized by Cyp11b1, and inhibiting 11β-HSD1 substantially enhanced antitumor immunity and reduced tumor growth. In humans, HSD11B1 was expressed in many cancer types, but CYP11B1 and CYP11B2 had low or absent expression (Figure 1C). The data thus far support the notion that 11β-HSD1–mediated regeneration, not Cyp11b1-mediated synthesis, is the major source of biologically, and perhaps clinically, relevant tumor-derived glucocorticoids.

Data availability. Values for all data points in graphs are reported in the Supporting Data Values file.

Supplementary Material

Supporting data values
jci-133-175274-s154.xlsx (12.4KB, xlsx)

Version 1. 11/01/2023

Electronic publication

Footnotes

Contributor Information

Matthew D. Taves, Email: matthew.taves@cornell.edu.

Shizuka Otsuka, Email: shizuka.otsuka@nih.gov.

Jonathan D. Ashwell, Email: jda@pop.nci.nih.gov.

References

  • 1.Taves MD, et al. Tumors produce glucocorticoids by metabolite recycling, not synthesis, and activate Tregs to promote growth. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(18):e164599. doi: 10.1172/JCI164599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cirillo N. Biosynthesis of glucocorticoids in tumors. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(21):e174686. doi: 10.1172/JCI174686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Slominski RM, et al. How cancer hijacks the body’s homeostasis through the neuroendocrine system. Trends Neurosci. 2023;46(4):263–275. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tiganescu A, et al. Increased glucocorticoid activation during mouse skin wound healing. J Endocrinol. 2014;221(1):51–61. doi: 10.1530/JOE-13-0420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Melo LMN, et al. Glucocorticoid activation by HSD11B1 limits T cell-driven interferon signaling and response to PD-1 blockade in melanoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2023;11(4):e004150. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ahmed A, et al. Immune escape of colorectal tumours via local LRH-1/Cyp11b1-mediated synthesis of immunosuppressive glucocorticoids. Mol Oncol. 2023;17(8):1545–1566. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting data values
jci-133-175274-s154.xlsx (12.4KB, xlsx)

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES