Yamamoto, H, Yokokohji, Y, Ishihara, T. Practicality Assessment of the Improved ICT-based Dementia Care Mapping Support System. Am. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. Other Dement. 2020;35:1-14. doi: 10.1177/1533317520935716
Table 1 has been revised. The changes do not disclose any error in the data and are only textual. They have been highlighted bold.
Table 1.
Characteristics of Subjects, Participants, and Sites.
| Demographic | Characteristic | n | (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Subjects | 8 | ||
| Gender | Male | 6 | (75) |
| Female | 2 | (25) | |
| Age | 30s | 1 | (12.5) |
| 40s | 3 | (37.5) | |
| 50s | 4 | (50) | |
| Role | Care Profession | 3 | (37.5) |
| Management | 2 | (25) | |
| Doctor | 1 | (12.5) | |
| Training and Education | 2 | (25) | |
| Level of DCM Training | Basic User | 2 | (25) |
| Advanced User | 5 | (62.5) | |
| Higher Level User | 1 | (12.5) | |
| Computer Literacy | High | 2 | (25) |
| Normal | 2 | (25) | |
| Poor | 3 | (37.5) | |
| Illiterate | 1 | (12.5) | |
| (b) Participants | 15 | ||
| Gender | Male | 3 | (20) |
| Female | 12 | (80) | |
| Age | 60s | 1 | (6.7) |
| 70s | 3 | (20) | |
| 80s | 8 | (53.3) | |
| 90s | 3 | (20) | |
| (c) Sites | 3 | ||
| Type | Nursing Home | 2 | (66.7) |
| Day Center | 1 | (33.3) |
A few entries in Table 4 have been modified, they do not change or influence the data or the result in any way.
Table 4.
Concordance Rates per Participant in Case 2 Mapping.
| Mapper Pair and Map Category | Concordance Rate per Participant | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | Total | ||
| M12-M22 | |||||||
| Prep Map (1 hour) |
Relevant time frames | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 120 |
| Concordance rate: CR0 (%) | 67 | 21 | 71 | 58 | 75 | 58 | |
|
Prime Map
(5 hours) |
Relevant time frames | 114 | 106 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 568 |
| Concordance rate: CR (%) | 82 | 50 | 67 | 66 | 65 | 66 | |
| M12-M32 | |||||||
| Prep Map (1 hour) |
Relevant time frames | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 120 |
| Concordance rate: CR0 (%) | 71 | 54 | 88 | 67 | 83 | 73 | |
|
Prime Map
(5 hours) |
Relevant time frames | 114 | 106 | 116 | 106 | 116 | 558 |
| Concordance rate: CR (%) | 76 | 61 | 75 | 77 | 60 | 70 | |
| M22-M32 | |||||||
| Prep Map (1 hour) |
Relevant time frames | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 120 |
| Concordance rate: CR0 (%) | 75 | 25 | 83 | 79 | 75 | 68 | |
| Prime Map (5 hours) |
Relevant time frames | 120 | 112 | 120 | 108 | 120 | 580 |
| Concordance rate: CR (%) | 81 | 65 | 74 | 69 | 74 | 73 | |
The following sentence on page 12 should be considered as the 5th bullet point as one of the responses received of open question regarding the usefulness of the support system:
It would be nice if I could compare coding with other mapper easily after mapping; for example, only the time frames with coding disagreements would be displayed automatically.