Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia, affecting approximately 34 million worldwide1. The pathophysiology of AF remains incompletely understood but is clearly complex with multiple underlying genetic, physiologic and environmental factors. Very early-onset AF (vEAF) (defined here as onset <45 years and without significant comorbidities), while rare (only ~0.5–3% of AF cases), is highly heritable, with a greater prevalence of rare variants in genes previously associated with AF2. Patients with vEAF, therefore, represent an ideal population for discovering novel genes involved in the underlying genetic basis of AF. Notably, the Framingham study showed that patients with AF without comorbidities have a three-fold higher risk for heart failure3. Conversely, several forms of inherited cardiomyopathy have been strongly associated with AF4 suggestive of a shared etiology.
In this study, we investigated a rare cohort of patients with vEAF having otherwise normal cardiac structure and function using comprehensive genetics evaluations, including broad clinical genetic testing. Exclusion criteria included congenital heart disease or traditional AF risk factors including hyperthyroidism, heart failure, significant valvular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, myocardial ischemia, morbid obesity, concurrent infection, alcohol, stimulant abuse, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and/or pulmonary hypertension. We hypothesized that the prevalence of rare genetic variation in genes associated with cardiomyopathy would be higher in this cohort.
Specifically, we assessed a cohort of consecutive patients referred to the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases for evaluation of vEAF between 2014 and 2018. This retrospective chart review was approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board. Patients were included if they had normal cardiac function and a structurally normal heart by initial echocardiogram as well as no other significant comorbidities. Each patient received genetic counseling and a detailed 3–4 generation family history was collected by a cardiovascular genetic counselor. We identified 25 families with vEAF. This includes 23 unrelated patients with vEAF and 2 unrelated patients with AF onset <60 years with a first-degree family member with vEAF (Probands 2 and 17). The mean age of AF diagnosis was 27.2 years (SD 13.5) and 76% of patients were male (Table). All patients at the time of their AF diagnosis had structurally normal hearts with the exception of the probands of Family 2 and 21, who initially had tachycardia-induced cardiac dysfunction but soon after exhibited restoration of normal ventricular ejection fraction following rhythm control. Notably, 40% of patients (10 of 25) had a first- or second-degree relative with vEAF, while 36% (9 of 25) had first- or second-degree relatives with either early onset (<50 years) idiopathic cardiomyopathy (20%, 5 of 25), unexplained sudden death (20%, 5 of 25) and/or strokes (12%, 3 of 25).
Table. Demographics and Testing Results.
Family | AF Onset (yrs) | Sex | Race/Ethnicity | Rare Genetic Variants | Variant Class | Family Hx |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 20 | F | AA | RBM20 p.Arg634Gln | Pathogenic | *† ‡† |
2 | 58 | F | Caucasian | TTN p.Arg31606X | Likely pathogenic | *† ‡† §† |
3 | 16 | M | Caucasian | ANK2 p.Asp905Asn | VUS | |
4 | 21 | M | Caucasian | SCN5A p.Thr1779Met | VUS | |
5 | 27 | M | Caucasian | FKRP p.Ala13Thr | VUS | * † |
6 | 40 | M | Asian | RBM20 p.Cys417Tyr | VUS | |
7 | 43 | M | Caucasian | TTN p.Gly17311ValfsX46 | Likely pathogenic | |
8 | 38 | M | Caucasian | BAG3 p.Arg45Cys | VUS | * † |
9 | 39 | M | Caucasian | ANK2 p.Gly1439Cys | VUS, probably benign | |
10 | 30 | M | Asian | SCN5A p.Asp1156Gly | VUS, probably benign | |
ANK2 p.Ala373Val | VUS, probably benign | |||||
11 | 16 | M | Hispanic | TTN p.Lys17359Asnfs*9 | Likely pathogenic | *† ‡ |
KCNT1 p.Pro546Leu | VUS | |||||
NEXN p.Tyr640Thrfs*14 | VUS | |||||
RBM20 p.Gly583Asp | VUS, probably benign | |||||
SCN10A p.Val1024Met | VUS, probably benign | |||||
12 | 14 | M | Caucasian | CACNA1C p.Phe1226Leu | VUS | |
DEPDC5 p.Ala1091Val | VUS | |||||
13 | 40 | M | Caucasian | ABCC9 p.Leu1524Lysfs*5 | VUS | |
ALMS1 p.Arg3239Cys | VUS, probably benign | |||||
14 | 30 | F | Caucasian | ALMS1 p.Ile486Val | VUS, probably benign | || |
15 | 20 | M | Caucasian | DMD p.Gly2609Asp | VUS | || |
FKRP p.Ser152Arg | VUS | |||||
16 | 19 | M | Caucasian | KCNQ1 p.Arg231His | Pathogenic | * † |
LAMP2 p.Ile379Val | VUS | |||||
17 | 53 | M | Caucasian | FKRP p.Pro358Leu | VUS | *† § |
ANK2 p.Arg2506Gln | VUS | |||||
18 | 44 | M | Caucasian | CAV3 p.Arg148Trp | VUS, probably benign | |
19 | 16 | M | Hispanic | KCNA5 p.Gly182Arg | VUS, probably benign | § || |
SCN10A p.Arg814His | VUS, probably benign | |||||
20 | 10 | F | AA | ACADVL p.Glu643Asp | VUS, probably benign | *† ‡ |
MYBPC3 p.Gly1093Gly | VUS, probably benign | |||||
MYLK2 c.1425–6C>A (Intronic) | VUS | |||||
21 | 25 | F | Hispanic | TTN p.Arg19624* | Likely pathogenic | |
22 | 16 | M | Caucasian | DSP p.Val495Met | VUS, probably benign | |
23 | 17 | M | Hispanic | None | None | |
24 | 14 | F | Caucasian | ANK2 p.Ser3446Gly | VUS | * |
DTNA p.Arg536Trp | VUS | |||||
RYR2 c.1292+3A>G (Intronic) | VUS | |||||
25 | 15 | M | Caucasian | RYR2 p.Glu4431Lys | VUS | *† ‡ || |
DSC2 p.Leu294Ile | VUS, probably benign |
AA: African American, AF Onset: atrial fibrillation onset of proband, VUS: variant of unknown significance
vEAF (<45 years)
Cardiomyopathy (<50 years)
Stroke (<50 years)
Sudden Death (<50 years)
further denotes disease process in first-degree relative.
Patients underwent genetic testing using inherited arrhythmias and cardiomyopathy panels (73 to 149 genes) from CLIA and CAP approved commercial laboratories. The majority of patients (21 of 25) received the Arrhythmia and Cardiomyopathy Comprehensive Panel (Invitae, San Francisco. 149 genes). Variant classifications reported here are based on re-assessment by our team in 2019 using contemporary gene- and disease-specific classification approaches. Genetic testing identified at least one rare variant in a cardiomyopathy-associated gene in 85% or 21 of 25 patients, while one proband had no rare variants detected and the remaining three had rare variants in known AF-related genes. Notably, 6 of the 25 patients (24%) had actionable variants deemed “likely pathogenic” or “pathogenic”. Four of these six patients had likely pathogenic, loss-of-function (LOF) variants in the sarcomeric gene Titin (TTN) [p.Gly17311ValfsX46 (c.51930delT) in exon 241; p.Lys17359Asnfs*9 (c.52077_52078delinsT) in exon 273; p.Arg19624* (c.58870C>T) in exon 300; and p.Arg31606X (c.94816C>T) in exon 341]. Truncating A-band variants such as these are significantly overrepresented in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and considered to be likely pathogenic for that disease. Notably, these four TTN truncation variants represented 16% of the cohort, larger than previously reported5,6. Additionally, another pathogenic variant was detected in another sarcomere-related gene, RBM20 (Proband 1).
To date, 11 patients have received further evaluation by MRI or CT (mean interval time after echocardiogram 817 days, SD: 1194 days), with 8 revealing reduced ventricular function, chamber enlargement, borderline LV non-compaction or late gadolinium enhancement not appreciated on presenting echocardiogram consistent with either interval disease development or possibly increased sensitivity of detection.
Overall, in a cohort of 25 patients with vEAF but otherwise normal heart structure and function at presentation, clinical genetic evaluations revealed not only a high rate of familial vEAF but also cardiomyopathy within the pedigrees. Consistently, genetic testing using expanded clinical gene panels uncovered a high burden of rare variation in cardiomyopathy-related genes, most notably in LOF, truncation variants of TTN. These results were coupled with new structural findings by cardiac MRI in some that had previously not manifested at presentation. Together these data suggest an association between vEAF and rare variants in TTN prior to the clinical onset of cardiomyopathy. While additional studies with larger clinical cohorts are clearly needed to translate these findings into clinical practice, our study would argue for a more thorough clinical evaluation and longitudinal follow up in this unique subpopulation of patients.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments:
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the NIH and collaborative efforts of the entire SCICD. Any additional data that support the findings of this study not present in this letter format are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Sources of Funding: This work was supported by the Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, the Stanford Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, American Heart Association (Fellow to Faculty Award) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Harold Amos Faculty Development Award (M.P.). This was also supported by the Department of Pediatrics and Division of Pediatric Cardiology at Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital and the Training Grant (T32) entitled Research Training in Myocardial Biology at Stanford (NIH 2 T32 HL094274) (W.R.G.).
Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms:
- LOF
loss-of-function
- TTN
titin
- vEAF
very early onset atrial fibrillation
Footnotes
Disclosures: CC: Personalis Inc. (Menlo Park, CA), Stockholder. Phosphorus Inc. (NY, NY), Advisor; EA: Personalis Inc. (Menlo Park, CA), Co-founder
References:
- 1.Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, Gillum RF, Kim Y-H, McAnulty JH, Zheng Z- J, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014;129:837–847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Olesen MS, Andreasen L, Jabbari J, Refsgaard L, Haunsø S, Olesen S-P, Nielsen JB, Schmitt N, Svendsen JH. Very early-onset lone atrial fibrillation patients have a high prevalence of rare variants in genes previously associated with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:246–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim E-J, Yin X, Fontes JD, Magnani JW, Lubitz SA, McManus DD, Seshadri S, Vasan RS, Ellinor PT, Larson MG, et al. Atrial fibrillation without comorbidities: Prevalence, incidence and prognosis (from the Framingham Heart Study). Am Heart J. 2016;177:138–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Santhanakrishnan R, Wang N, Larson MG, Magnani JW, McManus DD, Lubitz SA, Ellinor PT, Cheng S, Vasan RS, Lee DS, et al. Atrial Fibrillation Begets Heart Failure and Vice Versa: Temporal Associations and Differences in Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction. Circulation. 2016;133:484–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Choi SH, Weng L-C, Roselli C, Lin H, Haggerty CM, Shoemaker MB, Barnard J, Arking DE, Chasman DI, Albert CM, et al. Association Between Titin Loss-of-Function Variants and Early-Onset Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA. 2018;320:2354–2364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ahlberg G, Refsgaard L, Lundegaard PR, Andreasen L, Ranthe MF, Linscheid N, Nielsen JB, Melbye M, Haunsø S, Sajadieh A, et al. Rare truncating variants in the sarcomeric protein titin associate with familial and early-onset atrial fibrillation. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.