In the recent 2021 CNS5 WHO classification, molecular alterations were introduced into meningioma grading [4]. Specifically, mutations in the promotor area of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene and/or homozygous loss of the CDKN2A/B locus automatically result in a grade 3 diagnosis [3, 4]. Simultaneously meningioma with TRAF7, AKT1, KLF4, and/or SMO mutations are, in general, associated with lower progression risk [1, 10]. Alterations linked with increased risk include BAP1 mutations [9], copy-number variations of chromosomal arms such as 1p, 6q, 10q and 14q [6], genome-wide epigenetic profiles also referred to as DNA methylation classes (MC) [8], or the combination of molecular alterations included in an integrated risk score, grade or classification [2, 5, 7]. As most studies identifying molecular risk factors are retrospective in design, independent validation is needed to further advance the adoption of meningioma molecularly based risk prediction. Here, we present additional retrospective analysis on the data derived from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22042-26042 clinical trial, designed to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness and adverse effects of high-dose radiotherapy in the treatment of atypical (WHO grade 2) and malignant (WHO grade 3) meningiomas [11].
The EORTC 22042–26042 trial included 78 patients (69 WHO grade 2 and nine grade 3 meningioma) with different arms based on the Simpson grade, a clinical variable for the extent of the resection. Results from the primary aim of the study have been published before and identified that the 3-year progression free survival (PFS) in patients with WHO grade 2 meningioma undergoing high-dose (60 Gy) radiotherapy is significantly higher than the hypothesized primary study endpoint (88% observed versus 70% hypothesized) [11]. In the present study we screened mutations, copy-number variations and DNA methylation profiles, for their prognostic value. Of the 78 patients enrolled in the trial, 53 patients consented their resected material to be available for further research. The samples were analyzed using next generation sequencing (NGS) for (hotspot) alterations in AKT1, TRAF7, SMO, KLF4, BAP1 and the TERT-promotor, for DNA methylation profiling and copy number analysis for chromosomal losses of 1p and 22q. Cases were identified as either NF2-type or non-NF2-type based on mutations detected in NF2, AKT1, SMO, KLF4 or TRAF7. For n = 38 patients, adequate material was available for DNA methylation profiling (Fig. 1a). All molecular analyses were performed at the Department of Neuropathology of the University Hospital Heidelberg (Germany) and in-depth descriptions of the materials and methods used have been published before [5, 8]. PFS was defined as the time between the date of registration to tumor growth or death of any cause, whereas overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between date of registration and death of any cause. When comparing clinical characteristics between consensus for further research state, encompassing factors such as age, sex, performance status, and tumor attributes such as WHO grade, tumor volume, location, and Simpson grade, only the distribution of WHO grade exhibited a statistically significant difference. Notably, the group that provided consent for further analyses contained a higher proportion of patients with WHO grade 2 tumors (Supp. Table 1). Out of the n = 53 tumors analyzed, SMO mutations were not detected, AKT1, KLF4 and BAP1 mutations were detected once, TERT-promotor mutations twice and a total of three cases with mutations in TRAF7, hampering further analyses of prognostic value of these markers (Suppl. Table 2). Deletions of CDKN2A/B were detected three times (2 homozygous losses and 1 heterozygous loss), 1p loss 23 times (60.5%) and 22q losses 29 times (76.3%). The frequency of observed events was generally similar to larger meningioma cohorts [10]. Most cases were identified as intermediate meningioma MC (44.7%), followed by malignant (28.9%) and benign (26.3%) MC (molecular events per MC in Suppl. Table 3). These three overarching MC can be subdivided into six subclasses (benign-1, benign-2, benign-3, intermediate-A, intermediate-B and malignant) but due to the relatively small number of cases included, further analyses only included the three main MCs benign, intermediate and malignant [8]. Since the aim of this study was to identify molecular markers associated with risk for progression and only 3 WHO grade 3 cases with consent were available, the two WHO grade groups were aggregated for further analysis.
PFS univariate analysis at 10% significance identified sex, Simpson stage, age (median), 1p loss (Fig. 1b), meningioma MC (Fig. 1c) and CDKN2A/B loss (Fig. 1d) as prognostic factors (Suppl. Table 4). In a subset of cases with residual tumor (n = 24), all volumetric measurements above the median, except for tumor length, were significantly associated with worse PFS. Due to the low number of cases with residual tumor and adequate molecular information available (n = 11), or a small number of events for CDKN2A/B, further multivariate analyses on these (volumetric) measurements could not be performed. In the final multivariate clinical and molecular full Cox model, loss of chromosome 1p and MC were identified as significant factors at the 10% significance level (Suppl. Table 5).
OS univariate analysis at 10% significance identified WHO performance status, sex, Simpson stage, age (median), MC and CDKN2A/B loss as prognostic factors (Suppl. Table 6). In the multivariate clinical and molecular full Cox model however, none of the factors reached significance, possibly due to the limited number of OS events available (e = 8) compared to the total number of modalities included in the model (k = 7; Suppl. Table 7).
In conclusion, this study identifies independent prognostic impact of MC and 1p loss on PFS in a cohort of atypical and malignant meningioma undergoing high-dose radiotherapy. In line, 1p loss is observed in most meningioma of (epi)genetically and/or transcriptomically defined increased risk [6]. Hence, 1p analysis may provide an independent, cost-efficient marker for identification of cases at higher risk of recurrence. Due to the relatively small cohort and events, the association of CDKN2A/B loss and TERT-promotor mutations with outcome could not be validated and should be investigated in a larger prospective cohort with longer follow-up.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation (EKFS, Grant Nos. 2015_A_60 and 2017_EKES.24), the German Cancer Aid (Grant No. 70112956), and the Hertie Foundation (Hertie Network of Excellence in Clinical Neuroscience).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Data availability
All data sharing requests should be directed to the EORTC and will be evaluated according to standard operating procedures of the EORTC Brain Tumor Group. Data sharing requires compliance with current data protection regulations by the European Union, a positive vote by competent ethics committee, and data access agreements with the EORTC.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Berghoff AS, Hielscher T, Ricken G, Furtner J, Schrimpf D, Widhalm G, Rajky U, Marosi C, Hainfellner JA, von Deimling A, Sahm F, Preusser M. Prognostic impact of genetic alterations and methylation classes in meningioma. Brain Pathol. 2022;32:e12970. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Driver J, Hoffman SE, Tavakol S, Woodward E, Maury EA, Bhave V, Greenwald NF, Nassiri F, Aldape K, Zadeh G, Choudhury A, Vasudevan HN, Magill ST, Raleigh DR, Abedalthagafi M, Aizer AA, Alexander BM, Ligon KL, Reardon DA, Wen PY, Al-Mefty O, Ligon AH, Dubuc AM, Beroukhim R, Claus EB, Dunn IF, Santagata S, Bi WL. A molecularly integrated grade for meningioma. Neuro Oncol. 2021;24:796–808. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goldbrunner R, Stavrinou P, Jenkinson MD, Sahm F, Mawrin C, Weber DC, Preusser M, Minniti G, Lund-Johansen M, Lefranc F, Houdart E, Sallabanda K, Le Rhun E, Nieuwenhuizen D, Tabatabai G, Soffietti R, Weller M. EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:1821–1834. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, Hawkins C, Ng HK, Pfister SM, Reifenberger G, Soffietti R, von Deimling A, Ellison DW. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:1231–1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maas SLN, Stichel D, Hielscher T, Sievers P, Berghoff AS, Schrimpf D, Sill M, Euskirchen P, Blume C, Patel A, Dogan H, Reuss D, Dohmen H, Stein M, Reinhardt A, Suwala AK, Wefers AK, Baumgarten P, Ricklefs F, Rushing EJ, Bewerunge-Hudler M, Ketter R, Schittenhelm J, Jaunmuktane Z, Leu S, Greenway FEA, Bridges LR, Jones T, Grady C, Serrano J, Golfinos J, Sen C, Mawrin C, Jungk C, Hänggi D, Westphal M, Lamszus K, Etminan N, Jungwirth G, Herold-Mende C, Unterberg A, Harter PN, Wirsching H-G, Neidert MC, Ratliff M, Platten M, Snuderl M, Aldape KD, Brandner S, Hench J, Frank S, Pfister SM, Jones DTW, Reifenberger G, Acker T, Wick W, Weller M, Preusser M, von Deimling A, Sahm F. Integrated molecular-morphologic meningioma classification: a multicenter retrospective analysis, retrospectively and prospectively validated. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:3839–3852. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nasrallah MP, Aldape KD. Molecular classification and grading of meningioma. J Neurooncol. 2023;161:373–381. doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-04228-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nassiri F, Liu J, Patil V, Mamatjan Y, Wang JZ, Hugh-White R, Macklin AM, Khan S, Singh O, Karimi S, Corona RI, Liu LY, Chen CY, Chakravarthy A, Wei Q, Mehani B, Suppiah S, Gao A, Workewych AM, Tabatabai G, Boutros PC, Bader GD, Carvalho DD, Kislinger T, Aldape K, Zadeh G. A clinically applicable integrative molecular classification of meningiomas. Nature. 2021;597:119–125. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03850-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sahm F, Schrimpf D, Stichel D, Jones DTW, Hielscher T, Schefzyk S, Okonechnikov K, Koelsche C, Reuss DE, Capper D, Sturm D, Wirsching H-G, Berghoff AS, Baumgarten P, Kratz A, Huang K, Wefers AK, Hovestadt V, Sill M, Ellis HP, Kurian KM, Okuducu AF, Jungk C, Drueschler K, Schick M, Bewerunge-Hudler M, Mawrin C, Seiz-Rosenhagen M, Ketter R, Simon M, Westphal M, Lamszus K, Becker A, Koch A, Schittenhelm J, Rushing EJ, Collins VP, Brehmer S, Chavez L, Platten M, Hänggi D, Unterberg A, Paulus W, Wick W, Pfister SM, Mittelbronn M, Preusser M, Herold-Mende C, Weller M, von Deimling A. DNA methylation-based classification and grading system for meningioma: a multicentre, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:682–694. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30155-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shankar GM, Abedalthagafi M, Vaubel RA, Merrill PH, Nayyar N, Gill CM, Brewster R, Bi WL, Agarwalla PK, Thorner AR, Reardon DA, Al-Mefty O, Wen PY, Alexander BM, Van Hummelen P, Batchelor TT, Ligon KL, Ligon AH, Meyerson M, Dunn IF, Beroukhim R, Louis DN, Perry A, Carter SL, Giannini C, Curry WT, Cahill DP, Barker FG, Brastianos PK, Santagata S. Germline and somatic BAP1 mutations in high-grade rhabdoid meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 2016;19:535–545. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang JZ, Nassiri F, Landry AP, Patil V, Liu J, Aldape K, Gao A, Zadeh G. The multiomic landscape of meningiomas: a review and update. J Neurooncol. 2023;161:405–414. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04253-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Weber DC, Ares C, Villa S, Peerdeman SM, Renard L, Baumert BG, Lucas A, Veninga T, Pica A, Jefferies S, Ricardi U, Miralbell R, Stelmes J-J, Liu Y, Collette L, Collette S. Adjuvant postoperative high-dose radiotherapy for atypical and malignant meningioma: a phase-II parallel non-randomized and observation study (EORTC 22042–26042) Radiother and Oncol. 2018;128:260–265. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data sharing requests should be directed to the EORTC and will be evaluated according to standard operating procedures of the EORTC Brain Tumor Group. Data sharing requires compliance with current data protection regulations by the European Union, a positive vote by competent ethics committee, and data access agreements with the EORTC.