Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Jul 5;32(7):976–985. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0102

Estimated ovulatory years prior to menopause and postmenopausal endogenous hormone levels.

Daniel W Cramer 1,2, Allison F Vitonis 1, Tianyi Huang 2,3, Amy L Shafrir 4, A Heather Eliassen 2,3,5, Robert L Barbieri 6, Susan E Hankinson 7
PMCID: PMC10630892  NIHMSID: NIHMS1898634  PMID: 37127868

Abstract

Background

Lifetime ovulatory years (LOY) is estimated by the difference between ages at menopause and menarche subtracting time for events interrupting ovulation. We tested whether LOY influences sex-hormone levels in postmenopausal women with at least one intact ovary not using hormones.

Methods

Estradiol, estrone, estrone sulfate, total testosterone, dehydroepiandrostendione sulfate (DHEAS), prolactin, and sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were measured in 1,976 postmenopausal women from the Nurses’ Health Study. Associations of age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol use, and other factors on hormones were assessed by t-tests and ANOVA. Linear regression was used to assess multivariable-adjusted associations between LOY and hormones and trends in hormone levels per 5-year increases in LOY were estimated.

Results

Women averaged 61.4 years old, 11.0 years since menopause, with BMI of 25.8 kg/m2. 13.6% had irregular cycles, 17.5% hysterectomy, 6.4% unilateral oophorectomy, and 13.8% were current smokers. Variables associated with one or more hormone levels were included as covariates. Each 5-year increase in LOY was significantly associated with a 5.2% increase in testosterone in women with BMI<25 kg/m2 and a 7.4% increase in testosterone and 7.3% increase in estradiol in women with above-average BMI.

Conclusions

This is the first study to show that greater LOY is associated with higher testosterone in postmenopausal women and higher estradiol in those with elevated BMI, suggesting accumulation of functioning stromal and thecal cells from repeated ovulations and peripheral conversion of testosterone.

Impact

A possible explanation for why greater LOY increases risk for breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer is offered.

Keywords: Testosterone, Estradiol, Menopause, Ovulation

Introduction

Why more estimated ovulations accumulated before menopause increases risk for cancers of reproductive organs and to what extent the postmenopausal ovary retains potential for hormone production are two important questions to cancer research and reproductive biology. Lifetime ovulatory years (LOY) is estimated by the difference between ages at menopause and menarche subtracting time for events interrupting ovulation. Greater LOY, described by the phrase “incessant ovulation,” was first hypothesized to explain risk for ovarian cancer in 1971(1) and supported by subsequent studies.(27) Repetitive damage to the ovarian surface from ovulation was originally postulated; later, exposure of tubal-fimbria cells to growth-factor-enriched follicular fluid was suggested.(8,9) The hypothesis was extended to breast and endometrial cancers(10), using the term “sterile menstrual cycles” and also supported by subsequent studies.(1114) Cumulative effects of cyclic hormones on proliferation of breast and endometrial tissue could explain associations between LOY and these cancers.

Concerning hormone production from the postmenopausal ovary, it has been argued that the adrenal glands may be the more important source of androgens after menopause.(15) However, more persuasive, we believe, are studies in which ovarian veins were cannulated in postmenopausal women having pelvic surgery. These showed higher levels of testosterone and androstenedione in the ovarian venous blood than peripheral blood.(1618) Cross-sectional studies of hormone levels in postmenopausal women are also relevant. Thirteen such studies were pooled and reanalyzed to identify determinants of estrone, estradiol, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrostendione sulfate (DHEAS), testosterone, and sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG).(19) Older women had lower hormone levels except for SHBG. Androgens were lower in women who had bilateral oophorectomy compared to women with intact ovaries. All hormones were higher in obese women except for SHBG.

An association between estimated LOY and hormone levels was not examined in either the cross-sectional or cannulation studies cited above, bringing us to a third question addressed in this study. Do postmenopausal ovaries which underwent more estimated ovulations have greater potential for sex hormone production? We address this question with cross-sectional data from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS).

Methods

Study population

NHS was established in 1976 among 121,700 US female registered nurses, ages 30 to 55 years. Women completed questionnaires at baseline and biennially on exposures and disease diagnoses. Blood samples were collected in 1989–1990 from 32,826 postmenopausal participants not currently using hormonal therapy (HT).(20) Subsequently, plasma hormone levels were measured in nested case-control studies of various diseases.(2126) Data on hormone levels in women selected as controls in these studies were consolidated to assess the effect of oophorectomy on postmenopausal hormone levels.(27) Updating these data through 2021, we identified a total of 2,364 postmenopausal women with plasma samples who had not used HT in the 5 months prior to the blood draw. Women were excluded who had: estradiol levels above 30 pg/ml, suggesting recent HT use (n=17); bilateral oophorectomy prior to the blood draw (N=285); and missing data necessary to calculate ovulatory years (N=86). After these exclusions (n=388), the final sample included 1,976 women.

Exposures

Variables to estimate LOY included ages at menarche and menopause, oral contraceptive (OC) use, parity, and breastfeeding. Age at natural menopause was the age after which no menstrual cycles occurred during the subsequent 12 months. For women who had a hysterectomy (without removal of both ovaries) before natural menopause, age at menopause was imputed.(28) Parity counted pregnancies lasting longer than 6 months. Years of OC use and data on number of children breastfed and total months of breastfeeding was also collected. LOY was estimated as the difference between age at menopause and age at menarche, subtracting years of OC use, 1 year for each pregnancy, and total years of breastfeeding. The following covariates were considered: age, years since menopause, body mass index (BMI, weight(kg)/height(m)2) at blood draw, smoking status (never, former, current), alcohol use (no regular use, ≤10, >10–20, >20–30, >30 grams/day), hysterectomy, unilateral oophorectomy, and menstrual cycle irregularity between ages 20–35 (very or usually regular and usually or very irregular).

Laboratory Assays

We evaluated estradiol, estrone, estrone sulfate, total testosterone, DHEAS, prolactin, and SHBG. Original descriptions of the assays used are found in three papers from NHS (24,29,30) and briefly summarized here. Estradiol, estrone, and testosterone were measured at Quest Diagnostics (San Juan Capistrano, CA) by radioimmunoassay following extraction and celite column chromatography or at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Estrone sulfate was assayed at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center’s Longcope Steroid Radioimmunoassay Laboratory (Worcester), Quest Diagnostics, or the Mayo Clinic, after estrone extraction, by enzymatically cleaving the estrone sulfate to release estrone, which was then measured as noted above. DHEAS was measured either at Quest Diagnostics by radioimmunoassay without a prior separation step or at the Mayo Clinic by a solid phase, competitive chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Deerfield, IL). SHBG was assayed at the Longcope Laboratory or at the Clinical Laboratory Research Core at Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston MA) using a solid-phase two-site chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay (Immulite; DPC, Inc). Prolactin was measured by microparticle enzyme immunoassay at either the Clinical Laboratory Research Core at the Massachusetts General Hospital using the ARCHITECTR chemiluminescence immunoassay system (Abbott Diagnostics, Chicago, IL) or at the Longcope Laboratory (Worcester) using the IMx System (Abbott Laboratory, Abbott Park, IL). The correlation between assays of the same hormone measured in two different labs was ≥0.9. To assess laboratory precision, masked replicates of 10% of all samples assayed were randomly interspersed; the average coefficients of variation across batches were <12%.

Statistical Analysis

Hormone levels were log-transformed and outliers were identified using the generalized extreme studentized deviate many-outlier detection approach and recalibrated to have a comparable distribution to an average batch according to the methods described by Rosner and colleagues.(31,32) Women with missing or outlying hormone information were excluded for specific analyses related to that hormone. We calculated geometric means for each hormone by categories of age at blood draw, years since menopause, BMI, smoking, alcohol use, hysterectomy, irregular cycles, age at menarche, age at menopause, OC use and duration, parity, breastfeeding, and LOY. Distributions were compared with t-tests and ANOVA.

We then used linear regression to examine relationships between LOY and hormone levels, adjusted for age at blood draw, years since menopause, BMI, smoking, alcohol use, hysterectomy, unilateral oophorectomy, and regularity of cycles. Variables which are components of LOY were not included as adjustment variables. We examined regression coefficients from the multivariable models to assess associations between LOY and hormone levels and calculated adjusted geometric means for each log-transformed hormone by LOY quartile (<29.8, 29.8–33.0, 33.1–35.9, ≥36.0 years). We tested for linear trends using LOY as a continuous variable and estimated the percent difference in biomarker levels for a 5-year increase in LOY. Results for all women were adjusted for BMI and presented separately by BMI category (<25, ≥25 kg/m2). Tests for significant interaction between continuous LOY and dichotomous BMI were assessed by the Wald test. The linear regression analysis was repeated excluding women with imputed ages at menopause.

Ethics Statement

The formation of the Nurses’ Health Study, subsequent data and blood collection protocols, and hormonal studies were approved by the Committee on the Use of Human Subjects in Research at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Boston, MA) under guidelines of the U.S. Common Rule

Data Availability

The data underlying this article are available by application. Further information including the procedures to obtain and access data from the Nurses’ Health Studies is described at https://www.nurseshealthstudy.org/researchers

Results

Table 1 shows participants’ characteristics. On average, women were 61.4 years old at blood draw; 12.7 years old at menarche; 50.4 years old at menopause; and were 11.0 years past menopause. The following percentages of women reported: irregular cycles (13.6%), hysterectomy before menopause (17.5%), and unilateral oophorectomy (6.4%). 95.8% of the women were parous and their mean parity was 3.5 births. 64.5% of women had breastfed and their mean total years of breastfeeding was 0.7. 32.2% had used OCs and mean years used was 4.4. Mean estimated LOY was 32.4 years. The mean BMI for the sample was 25.8 kg/m2; and 13.8% and 41.5% were current or former smokers, respectively. Not all hormones were measured in the various studies leading to differences in numbers for the individual hormones measured. The median values were: 5.0 pg/mL for estradiol; 22.9 pg/mL for estrone; 230.4 pg/ml for estrone sulfate; 19.8 ng/dL for testosterone; 61.2 ug/dL for DHEAS; 8.8 ng/mL for prolactin; and 58.5 nmol/L for SHBG.

Table 1.

Characteristics of postmenopausal women not using hormone therapy whose plasma hormone levels were measured in the Nurses’ Health Study (n=1976).

Characteristic All participants (n=1976)
Age at blood draw, y (Mean, SD) 61.4 (4.7)
Age at menarche, y (Mean, SD) 12.7 (1.4)
Irregular cycles (n, %) 252 (13.6%)
Parous (n, %) 1892 (95.8%)
Parity (Mean, SD)* 3.5 (1.7)
Ever breastfed (n, %) 1275 (64.5%)
Duration of breastfeeding, y (Mean, SD) 0.7 (0.8)
Ever OC use (n, %) 633 (32.2%)
Duration of OC use, y (Mean, SD) 4.4 (4.4)
Age at menopause, y (Mean, SD) 50.4 (3.2)
Years since menopause, y (Mean, SD) 11.0 (5.2)
Hysterectomy (n, %) 346 (17.5%)
Unilateral oophorectomy (n, %) 127 (6.4%)
Ovulatory years (Mean, SD) 32.4 (5.2)
BMI at blood draw, kg/m2 (Mean, SD) 25.8 (4.7)
Smoking status (n, %)
 Never 885 (44.8%)
 Former 819 (41.5%)
 Current 272 (13.8%)
Alcohol (grams/day)
 No regular use 787 (41.7%)
 ≤20 964 (51.1%)
 >20 135 (7.2%)
Plasma hormone levels (median, 10th - 90th percentile, n)
 Estradiol (pg/mL) 5.0 (2.7–10.6), 1624
 Estrone (pg/mL) 22.9 (12.8–41.8), 1536
 Estrone sulfate (pg/mL) 230.4 (98.3–544.9), 1182
 Testosterone (ng/dL) 19.8 (10.4–37.5), 1869
 DHEAS (ug/dL) 61.2 (22.9–135.1), 1374
 Prolactin (ng/mL) 8.8 (5.3–15.6), 1192
 SHBG (nmol/L) 58.5 (28.1–103.1), 1779
*

Among parous women

Among women who ever breastfed

Among women who ever used OCs

Table 2 shows the distribution of participant characteristics across quartiles of LOY with the first row showing the corresponding means for those quartiles. Variables which are components of LOY affected LOY in predictable directions. More LOY occurred with: earlier menarche, lower parity, less breastfeeding, less OC use, and later menopause. Among variables which are not components of LOY, there were trends for women with more LOY to: be older, have had fewer years since menopause at blood draw, have a greater BMI, be non-smokers, and not regularly consume alcohol. The prevalence of hysterectomy was lowest among women with fewest LOY. No obvious trends in LOY were seen with irregular cycles and unilateral oophorectomy.

Table 2.

Characteristics of postmenopausal women not using hormone therapy at the time of blood draw in the Nurses’ Health Study by lifetime ovulatory years quartile (n=1976).

Characteristic Ovulatory years

<29.8 (n=492) 29.8–33.0 (n=507) 33.1–35.9 (n=471) ≥36 (n=506)
Ovulatory years (Mean, SD) 25.3 (3.7) 31.6 (1.0) 34.5 (0.7) 38.2 (1.7)
Components of ovulatory years
 Age at menarche, y (Mean, SD) 13.1 (1.5) 12.9 (1.4) 12.7 (1.2) 11.9 (1.2)
 Parous (n, %) 482 (98.0%) 499 (98.4%) 459 (97.5%) 452 (89.3%)
 Parity (Mean, SD)* 4.4 (2.2) 3.9 (1.6) 3.3 (1.2) 2.6 (1.1)
 Ever breastfed (n, %) 362 (73.6%) 326 (64.3%) 333 (70.7%) 254 (50.2%)
 Duration of breastfeeding, y (Mean, SD) 1.0 (1.0) 0.7 (0.8) 0.6 (0.6) 0.5 (0.5)
 Ever OC use (n, %) 319 (65.0%) 150 (29.8%) 102 (21.7%) 62 (12.3%)
 Duration of OC use, y (Mean, SD) 7.0 (4.6) 2.5 (2.7) 1.5 (1.9) 0.7 (0.8)
 Age at menopause, y (Mean, SD) 48.0 (4.0) 49.6 (2.3) 51.1 (1.9) 52.8 (2.0)
Other variables
 Age at blood draw, y (Mean, SD) 60.1 (5.0) 61.1 (4.8) 61.8 (4.6) 62.5 (4.2)
 Years since menopause, y (Mean, SD) 12.0 (6.0) 11.5 (5.1) 10.7 (4.6) 9.8 (4.5)
 Hysterectomy (n, %) 59 (12.0%) 94 (18.5%) 107 (22.7%) 86 (17.0%)
 Unilateral oophorectomy (n, %) 33 (6.7%) 30 (5.9%) 34 (7.2%) 30 (5.9%)
 Irregular cycles (n, %) 79 (17.3%) 59 (12.3%) 52 (11.7%) 62 (13.0%)
 BMI at blood draw, kg/m2 (Mean, SD) 25.4 (4.9) 25.5 (4.4) 25.8 (4.7) 26.5 (4.8)
 Smoking status (n, %)
  Never 216 (43.9%) 218 (43.0%) 207 (44.0%) 244 (48.2%)
  Former 195 (39.6%) 213 (42.0%) 201 (42.7%) 210 (41.5%)
  Current 81 (16.5%) 76 (15.0%) 63 (13.4%) 52 (10.3%)
 Alcohol (grams/day)
  No regular use 181 (38.4%) 200 (41.9%) 180 (39.6%) 226 (46.8%)
  ≤20 257 (54.6%) 243 (50.9%) 233 (51.2%) 231 (47.8%)
  >20 33 (7.0%) 34 (7.1%) 42 (9.2%) 26 (5.4%)
*

Among parous women

Among women who ever breastfed

Among women who ever used OCs

Table 3 shows unadjusted geometric mean hormone levels by participant characteristics. Older age at blood draw and greater years since menopause were associated with higher testosterone, lower DHEAS, and higher SHBG. Greater BMI was associated with higher estrogen levels and lower SHBG. Current smoking was associated with lower estrone sulfate and prolactin and higher testosterone, DHEAS, and SHBG. Alcohol use was associated with lower estradiol and estrone and higher estrone sulfate, DHEAS, and SHBG. Hysterectomy was associated with lower estrone sulfate, testosterone, and DHEAS. Women who had a unilateral oophorectomy had lower testosterone and women who with irregular cycles had lower SHBG. Greater LOY was associated with higher estradiol, estrone, testosterone, and lower SHBG.

Table 3.

Unadjusted geometric mean hormone levels by potential covariates in postmenopausal women not using hormone therapy at the time of blood draw in the Nurses’ Health Study (n=1976)

Estradiol (pg/mL) Estrone (pg/mL) Estrone sulfate (pg/mL) Testosterone (ng/dL) DHEAS (ug/dL) Prolactin (ng/mL) SHBG (nmol/L)
N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI)
Age at blood draw
 <55 649 5.3 (5.1–5.6) 612 22.7 (21.8–23.5) 519 239.3 (225.2–254.3) 781 19.1 (18.5–19.8) 557 68.6 (64.6–72.8) 506 9.1 (8.8–9.5) 739 54.5 (52.5–56.6)
 ≥55 975 5.1 (5.0–5.3) 924 22.9 (22.2–23.6) 663 226.4 (214.9–238.4) 1088 20.3 (19.7–21.0) 817 51.2 (48.7–53.8) 686 8.8 (8.5–9.1) 1040 57.2 (55.5–58.9)
 t-test p-value 0.20 0.65 0.17 0.009 <0.0001 0.20 0.05
Years since menopause
 <10 632 5.4 (5.1–5.6) 598 22.9 (22.1–23.8) 501 242.2 (227.5–257.8) 743 19.2 (18.6–19.9) 530 68.0 (64.0–72.4) 482 9.2 (8.9–9.6) 707 53.5 (51.5–55.6)
 ≥10 992 5.1 (4.9–5.3) 938 22.7 (22.1–23.4) 681 224.7 (213.6–236.4) 1126 20.2 (19.6–20.9) 844 51.9 (49.4–54.6) 710 8.7 (8.5–9.0) 1072 57.8 (56.1–59.5)
 t-test p-value 0.08 0.69 0.07 0.03 <0.0001 0.05 0.002
BMI
 <25 830 4.1 (4.0–4.3) 789 20.1 (19.5–20.7) 591 189.9 (180.8–199.5) 958 19.8 (19.2–20.5) 708 58.3 (55.2–61.6) 612 9.0 (8.7–9.3) 923 68.9 (67.1–70.8)
 25–29.3 531 5.7 (5.5–6.0) 499 23.6 (22.6–24.6) 392 248.2 (231.7–265.8) 622 19.5 (18.7–20.3) 458 57.7 (54.0–61.7) 392 9.0 (8.6–9.4) 581 48.4 (46.6–50.3)
 ≥30 263 8.9 (8.4–9.4) 248 31.9 (30.2–33.8) 199 367.6 (334.8–403.7) 289 20.5 (19.4–21.8) 208 55.1 (49.8–61.1) 188 8.7 (8.1–9.3) 275 38.3 (36.1–40.7)
 t-test p-value <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.36 0.63 0.60 <0.0001
Smoking status
 Never 729 5.3 (5.1–5.5) 691 22.8 (22.0–23.6) 532 245.8 (231.7–260.7) 832 19.5 (18.8–20.2) 625 57.5 (54.4–60.8) 528 9.3 (8.9–9.6) 788 55.7 (53.8–57.7)
 Former 673 5.2 (5.0–5.4) 636 22.6 (21.8–23.5) 491 228.4 (214.8–242.8) 778 19.5 (18.8–20.2) 565 54.7 (51.3–58.3) 498 9.0 (8.6–9.3) 740 54.2 (52.3–56.3)
 Current 222 5.1 (4.7–5.4) 209 23.5 (22.1–24.9) 159 200.3 (180.3–222.5) 259 21.8 (20.5–23.1) 184 68.2 (61.2–76.0) 166 7.9 (7.4–8.4) 251 62.9 (59.3–66.8)
 ANOVA p-value 0.62 0.61 0.004 0.006 0.002 0.0002 0.0003
Alcohol (grams/day)
 No regular use 646 5.6 (5.3–5.8) 609 23.9 (23.0–24.8) 463 230.8 (215.8–246.8) 741 20.1 (19.4–20.9) 559 52.8 (49.6–56.2) 465 8.8 (8.4–9.1) 703 54.0 (51.9–56.2)
 ≤20 798 4.9 (4.7–5.1) 759 22.0 (21.3–22.7) 587 223.6 (212.1–235.7) 913 19.3 (18.7–20.0) 661 58.9 (55.8–62.2) 595 9.1 (8.7–9.4) 879 57.9 (56.0–59.7)
 >20 110 5.3 (4.8–5.8) 106 22.9 (20.9–25.0) 85 275.0 (237.9–318.0) 130 21.2 (19.4–23.3) 91 82.1 (70.2–95.9) 81 8.7 (7.8–9.7) 117 54.9 (50.3–60.0)
 ANOVA p-value <0.0001 0.005 0.03 0.07 <0.0001 0.46 0.02
Hysterectomy
 No 1342 5.2 (5.1–5.4) 1275 22.8 (22.2–23.4) 992 237.4 (227.4–247.8) 1545 20.4 (19.9–20.9) 1128 60.4 (57.9–63.1) 996 8.9 (8.6–9.1) 1471 56.3 (54.9–57.8)
 Yes 282 5.1 (4.8–5.5) 261 22.8 (21.5–24.1) 190 205.5 (186.2–226.7) 324 17.5 (16.4–18.5) 246 46.4 (42.2–51.0) 196 9.2 (8.7–9.8) 308 54.8 (51.8–57.9)
 t-test p-value 0.70 0.99 0.008 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.26 0.38
Unilateral oophorectomy
 No 1517 5.2 (5.1–5.4) 1435 22.8 (22.2–23.3) 1102 233.8 (224.5–243.5) 1745 20.0 (19.5–20.5) 1295 58.2 (55.9–60.6) 1112 8.9 (8.7–9.2) 1659 56.0 (54.7–57.4)
 Yes 107 5.0 (4.5–5.6) 101 23.3 (21.3–25.6) 80 207.6 (177.1–243.2) 124 17.5 (16.0–19.1) 79 49.0 (40.6–59.0) 80 9.1 (8.2–10.1) 120 56.7 (51.5–62.4)
 t-test p-value 0.49 0.61 0.14 0.004 0.04 0.74 0.81
Irregular cycles
 No 1317 5.2 (5.0–5.3) 1248 22.8 (22.2–23.4) 970 234.3 (224.2–244.9) 1513 19.7 (19.2–20.2) 1110 58.1 (55.6–60.7) 974 9.0 (8.8–9.3) 1445 56.8 (55.3–58.3)
 Yes 206 5.5 (5.1–5.9) 196 23.6 (22.2–25.2) 140 239.5 (215.6–266.1) 240 20.5 (19.2–21.8) 181 54.6 (49.0–60.7) 143 8.7 (8.1–9.4) 223 52.3 (49.0–55.9)
 t-test p-value 0.15 0.32 0.73 0.29 0.29 0.39 0.02

Table 4 presents unadjusted results for the association of the components LOY with hormones. An early age at menarche was associated only with higher estradiol levels while menopause after age 51 was associated with higher estradiol and estrone sulfate, but lower DHEAS and SHBG levels. Women who had any use of OCs had lower testosterone and prolactin levels and higher DHEAS levels, but no clear associations with duration of OC use. Conversely, hormone levels did not differ between ever and never parous women, but women with more children had lower estrone sulfate, testosterone, and DHEAS levels. Breastfeeding appeared to have the fewest associations with hormone levels. The final entry in Table 4 indicates that greater LOY was associated with higher estradiol and testosterone levels and lower SHBG.

Table 4.

Unadjusted geometric mean hormone levels by components of lifetime ovulatory years quartile in postmenopausal women not using hormone therapy at the time of blood draw in the Nurses’ Health Study (n=1976)

Estradiol (pg/mL) Estrone (pg/mL) Estrone sulfate (pg/mL) Testosterone (ng/dL) DHEAS (ug/dL) Prolactin (ng/mL) SHBG (nmol/L)
N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI) N Mean (95% CI)
Age at menarche
 <12 347 5.5 (5.2–5.8) 323 23.6 (22.4–24.8) 260 244.1 (224.1–265.8) 402 19.7 (18.8–20.7) 282 59.8 (54.9–65.1) 264 8.9 (8.4–9.4) 383 55.1 (52.4–58.0)
 12 408 5.3 (5.0–5.6) 391 23.3 (22.2–24.5) 303 233.9 (215.0–254.5) 468 20.0 (19.1–20.9) 334 59.8 (55.1–65.0) 298 9.0 (8.6–9.4) 447 55.4 (53.0–58.0)
 13 498 5.1 (4.9–5.4) 468 22.5 (21.5–23.4) 345 228.3 (212.6–245.1) 554 19.9 (19.1–20.8) 402 55.2 (51.4–59.4) 344 9.0 (8.6–9.4) 533 56.1 (53.7–58.6)
 14 227 5.1 (4.8–5.5) 221 22.2 (20.9–23.6) 169 221.1 (201.5–242.6) 268 19.9 (18.7–21.1) 214 58.1 (52.8–64.0) 173 8.8 (8.2–9.5) 250 56.3 (53.0–59.8)
 >14 144 4.7 (4.3–5.1) 133 21.7 (20.1–23.4) 105 227.1 (198.8–259.4) 177 19.3 (17.8–21.0) 142 54.6 (48.4–61.6) 113 8.9 (8.2–9.7) 166 59.8 (55.0–65.0)
 ANOVA p-value 0.04 0.27 0.64 0.96 0.45 0.99 0.50
Age at menopause
 <48 240 5.3 (4.9–5.6) 225 22.8 (21.5–24.3) 173 250.5 (225.9–277.7) 280 20.0 (18.9–21.2) 200 66.6 (60.1–73.8) 179 9.2 (8.5–9.9) 269 57.0 (53.6–60.7)
 48–49 246 4.8 (4.5–5.2) 236 21.9 (20.7–23.1) 191 211.3 (192.1–232.5) 287 19.9 (18.9–21.1) 213 62.6 (56.8–69.1) 187 8.7 (8.2–9.3) 272 61.5 (58.0–65.3)
 50–51 564 5.1 (4.9–5.3) 533 22.6 (21.7–23.5) 403 215.0 (201.1–229.9) 648 19.2 (18.4–20.0) 484 54.1 (50.6–57.7) 409 8.9 (8.5–9.3) 619 57.5 (55.3–59.7)
 >51 574 5.5 (5.2–5.7) 542 23.4 (22.5–24.4) 415 252.4 (235.9–270.0) 654 20.3 (19.5–21.1) 477 55.8 (52.1–59.7) 417 9.0 (8.6–9.4) 619 52.1 (50.0–54.3)
 ANOVA p-value 0.02 0.28 0.008 0.22 0.002 0.76 <0.0001
OC use
 No 1107 5.3 (5.1–5.4) 1052 23.0 (22.3–23.6) 779 229.0 (218.1–240.4) 1257 20.3 (19.7–20.9) 929 55.6 (53.1–58.3) 784 9.1 (8.8–9.4) 1200 56.3 (54.7–58.0)
 Yes 511 5.1 (4.9–5.4) 479 22.5 (21.5–23.4) 398 238.6 (223.0–255.3) 605 18.9 (18.1–19.7) 441 61.8 (57.5–66.3) 403 8.6 (8.2–8.9) 572 55.5 (53.3–57.8)
 t-test p-value 0.35 0.40 0.33 0.004 0.01 0.03 0.58
Duration of OC use
 ≤0.5 101 4.9 (4.4–5.5) 97 21.9 (19.8–24.3) 76 222.8 (189.4–262.0) 121 19.4 (17.5–21.5) 83 59.8 (50.1–71.4) 81 8.6 (7.9–9.3) 116 56.3 (51.5–61.5)
 >0.5–3 140 5.2 (4.7–5.8) 129 22.9 (21.0–25.0) 118 244.0 (214.9–277.1) 168 19.1 (17.5–20.8) 125 58.0 (50.4–66.7) 115 8.3 (7.6–9.0) 160 54.6 (50.7–58.7)
 >3–8 131 5.2 (4.8–5.7) 122 22.3 (20.5–24.2) 91 239.4 (210.7–272.1) 154 18.9 (17.5–20.5) 114 68.2 (60.4–77.1) 97 8.5 (7.9–9.2) 147 54.3 (49.9–59.1)
 >8 117 5.1 (4.6–5.6) 111 22.6 (20.6–24.8) 99 244.6 (210.9–283.7) 132 18.0 (16.7–19.5) 96 60.1 (51.1–70.7) 95 9.0 (8.2–9.9) 124 55.8 (51.3–60.6)
 ANOVA p-value 0.84 0.92 0.80 0.69 0.39 0.60 0.92
Parity
 Nulliparous 75 5.3 (4.6–6.0) 74 23.0 (20.6–25.7) 50 261.4 (211.9–322.4) 81 21.0 (18.6–23.8) 58 62.0 (51.6–74.4) 50 8.7 (8.0–9.5) 79 60.2 (53.8–67.3)
 Parous 1549 5.2 (5.1–5.3) 1462 22.8 (22.3–23.4) 1132 230.7 (221.6–240.2) 1788 19.8 (19.3–20.2) 1316 57.4 (55.2–59.8) 1142 8.9 (8.7–9.2) 1700 55.9 (54.6–57.2)
 t-test p-value 0.81 0.87 0.21 0.28 0.45 0.55 0.20
Parity
 1–2 462 5.3 (5.0–5.6) 439 23.3 (22.3–24.4) 333 240.0 (221.7–259.9) 513 20.9 (20.0–21.9) 379 62.7 (58.0–67.8) 331 9.4 (8.9–9.9) 497 55.0 (52.5–57.5)
 3 394 5.2 (4.9–5.4) 371 22.5 (21.5–23.6) 292 243.0 (225.7–261.7) 477 20.0 (19.1–20.9) 352 56.1 (51.9–60.6) 300 8.9 (8.4–9.3) 448 55.4 (52.9–58.0)
 4 355 5.1 (4.8–5.5) 330 22.6 (21.5–23.7) 252 227.9 (209.1–248.4) 410 19.0 (18.1–20.0) 300 55.8 (51.4–60.5) 265 8.9 (8.4–9.4) 397 56.6 (53.9–59.5)
 >4 338 5.2 (4.9–5.5) 322 22.6 (21.5–23.8) 255 209.0 (192.5–226.8) 388 18.8 (17.9–19.8) 285 54.4 (49.8–59.3) 246 8.6 (8.1–9.1) 358 56.9 (54.0–60.0)
 ANOVA p-value 0.83 0.66 0.04 0.007 0.05 0.10 0.71
Breastfeeding
 No 563 5.3 (5.0–5.5) 532 23.3 (22.4–24.2) 411 231.9 (216.7–248.1) 663 20.4 (19.6–21.2) 488 56.5 (53.0–60.3) 422 9.2 (8.8–9.6) 630 56.3 (54.2–58.6)
 Yes 1061 5.2 (5.0–5.3) 1004 22.5 (21.9–23.2) 771 232.0 (221.0–243.5) 1206 19.5 (19.0–20.1) 886 58.2 (55.4–61.2) 770 8.8 (8.5–9.1) 1149 55.9 (54.3–57.6)
 t-test p-value 0.44 0.18 0.99 0.09 0.48 0.08 0.76
Months breastfed
 ≤3 450 5.2 (4.9–5.4) 423 22.7 (21.7–23.8) 326 225.0 (208.2–243.1) 510 19.6 (18.8–20.6) 362 59.8 (55.4–64.6) 329 8.7 (8.3–9.1) 492 56.1 (53.7–58.6)
 4–11 328 5.1 (4.8–5.4) 311 22.3 (21.1–23.5) 243 236.0 (217.6–256.1) 374 19.1 (18.1–20.1) 282 57.4 (52.6–62.6) 244 8.5 (8.1–9.0) 357 56.5 (53.6–59.6)
 ≥12 283 5.2 (4.9–5.6) 270 22.6 (21.3–23.9) 202 238.8 (216.7–263.1) 322 19.8 (18.7–21.0) 242 56.9 (51.7–62.7) 197 9.2 (8.6–9.9) 300 54.9 (51.7–58.4)
 ANOVA p-value 0.86 0.86 0.56 0.60 0.68 0.17 0.77
Ovulatory years
 <29.8 403 5.0 (4.8–5.3) 381 21.9 (20.9–23.0) 313 230.3 (213.4–248.7) 470 18.5 (17.7–19.4) 347 59.7 (55.2–64.6) 312 8.4 (8.0–8.9) 445 57.7 (55.0–60.5)
 29.8–33.0 408 5.0 (4.7–5.2) 392 22.4 (21.4–23.5) 296 226.2 (210.2–243.3) 478 19.6 (18.8–20.5) 355 58.4 (54.1–63.0) 301 9.2 (8.7–9.7) 451 57.9 (55.4–60.5)
 33.1–35.9 392 5.3 (5.0–5.6) 365 23.1 (22.0–24.3) 269 223.5 (205.4–243.1) 442 20.6 (19.6–21.6) 323 55.4 (51.1–60.1) 278 9.1 (8.6–9.5) 422 56.7 (53.9–59.6)
 ≥36.0 421 5.5 (5.2–5.8) 398 23.8 (22.7–24.9) 304 247.4 (227.8–268.7) 479 20.6 (19.7–21.6) 349 56.9 (52.7–61.5) 301 9.1 (8.7–9.6) 461 52.3 (50.0–54.8)
 ANOVA p-value 0.02 0.09 0.28 0.004 0.59 0.05 0.007

Table 5 shows hormone levels by quartiles of LOY and examines the trend in hormone levels for 5-year increments in LOY as a continuous variable. Means and trends are adjusted for participant characteristics in Table 3 but not by components of LOY. BMI was included either as an adjustment or a stratification variable. In all women, adjusting for BMI, a significant trend was seen for testosterone with more LOY associated with higher levels. For each 5-year increase in LOY, there was a 6.2% increase in testosterone (95% CI: 3.5%−9.0%) overall. Similar trends with estradiol and estrone were also significant. For women with BMI<25 kg/m2, each 5-year increase in LOY was associated with a 5.2% increase in testosterone (95% CI: 1.3%, 9.1%). In women with above-average BMI, each 5-year increase in LOY was associated with a 7.4% (95% CI: 3.6%, 11.4%) increase in testosterone, a 7.3% (95% CI: 3.1%,11.7%) increase in estradiol, and a 7.0% (95% CI: 3.1%,11.1%) increase in estrone. Differences between the higher and lower BMI groups in the association of LOY with hormone levels were significant for estrone (p=0.02) and estrone sulfate (p=0.04), and borderline for estradiol (p=0.07). Slightly stronger associations were seen after excluding women whose age at menopause was imputed. (Supplemental Table 1). This included greater increases in testosterone with increasing LOY in all women (6.5%, 95% CI: 3.6%, 9.5%), women with BMI<25 kg/m2 (5.3%, 95% CI: 1.2%, 9.5%), and women with BMI≥25 kg/m2 (7.9%, 95% CI: 3.8%, 12.1%). Similarly, estradiol increased more with increasing LOY in all women (3.9%, 95% CI: 1.0%, 6.8%) and in women with above-average BMI (8.7%, 95% CI: 4.1%, 13.5%).

Table 5.

Adjusted geometric mean hormone levels by lifetime ovulatory years quartile among postmenopausal women not using hormone therapy at the time of blood draw in the Nurses’ Health Study (n=1976)

Hormone N Ovulatory years Difference per 5 years*

<29.8 Mean (95% CI)* 29.8–33.0 Mean (95% CI)* 33.1–35.9 Mean (95% CI)* ≥36.0 Mean (95% CI)* % (95% CI) p-trend
All women
 Estradiol (pg/mL) 1624 5.1 (4.8, 5.3) 5.1 (4.9, 5.3) 5.3 (5.0, 5.6) 5.4 (5.1, 5.6) 2.7 (0.1, 5.4) 0.05
 Estrone (pg/mL) 1536 21.8 (20.8, 22.8) 22.8 (21.8, 23.8) 23.1 (22.1, 24.2) 23.6 (22.5, 24.7) 2.6 (0.1, 5.1) 0.04
 Estrone sulfate (pg/mL) 1182 232.4 (215.5, 250.7) 233.1 (216.7, 250.8) 223.8 (207.2, 241.7) 237.7 (220.1, 256.7) 0.3 (−3.6, 4.3) 0.89
 Testosterone (ng/dL) 1869 18.0 (17.1, 18.9) 19.5 (18.7, 20.5) 20.9 (20.0, 22.0) 21.0 (20.0, 22.1) 6.2 (3.5, 9.0) <0.0001
 DHEAS (ug/dL) 1374 55.9 (51.5, 60.5) 57.6 (53.5, 62.1) 56.7 (52.4, 61.3) 60.4 (55.8, 65.5) 2.2 (−2.1, 6.7) 0.32
 Prolactin (ng/mL) 1192 8.3 (7.9, 8.7) 9.1 (8.7, 9.6) 9.1 (8.6, 9.6) 9.3 (8.8, 9.8) 1.3 (−1.5, 4.2) 0.35
 SHBG (nmol/L) 1779 55.5 (53.1, 58.1) 56.6 (54.2, 58.9) 57.6 (55.1, 60.1) 54.9 (52.5, 57.3) 0.7 (−1.7, 3.1) 0.57
BMI<25
 Estradiol (pg/mL) 830 4.2 (3.9, 4.5) 4.2 (3.9, 4.5) 4.0 (3.8, 4.3) 4.2 (3.9, 4.5) 0.1 (−3.6, 3.9) 0.96
 Estrone (pg/mL) 789 20.1 (18.9, 21.4) 20.5 (19.4, 21.7) 19.4 (18.2, 20.7) 20.2 (18.9, 21.5) −0.9 (−4.2, 2.5) 0.60
 Estrone sulfate (pg/mL) 591 202.7 (183.3, 224.2) 196.2 (178.5, 215.7) 177.5 (159.9, 197.1) 181.4 (163.1, 201.8) −4.5 (−9.5, 0.8) 0.09
 Testosterone (ng/dL) 958 18.3 (17.1, 19.6) 19.6 (18.5, 20.9) 20.7 (19.3, 22.2) 21.2 (19.7, 22.8) 5.2 (1.3, 9.1) 0.008
 DHEAS (ug/dL) 708 57.1 (51.2, 63.6) 60.0 (54.2, 66.4) 53.1 (47.5, 59.4) 63.9 (56.7, 72.0) 2.5 (−3.7, 9.0) 0.44
 Prolactin (ng/mL) 612 8.5 (7.9, 9.1) 8.7 (8.1, 9.3) 9.4 (8.8, 10.1) 9.5 (8.8, 10.3) 1.5 (−2.2, 5.4) 0.43
 SHBG (nmol/L) 923 67.5 (63.9, 71.3) 68.4 (64.9, 72.0) 72.5 (68.5, 76.8) 67.7 (63.8, 71.8) 0.7 (−2.3, 3.8) 0.64
BMI≥25
 Estradiol (pg/mL) 794 6.1 (5.6, 6.6) 6.2 (5.7, 6.7) 6.9 (6.4, 7.5) 7.2 (6.7, 7.8) 7.3 (3.1, 11.7) 0.0006
 Estrone (pg/mL) 747 23.6 (21.8, 25.4) 24.9 (23.2, 26.7) 27.5 (25.7, 29.4) 28.2 (26.3, 30.2) 7.0 (3.1, 11.1) 0.0004
 Estrone sulfate (pg/mL) 591 264.9 (235.1, 298.5) 274.7 (243.9, 309.3) 279.6 (248.0, 315.1) 313.3 (278.9, 352.0) 6.0 (−0.3, 12.7) 0.06
 Testosterone (ng/dL) 911 17.6 (16.4, 18.9) 19.4 (18.2, 20.8) 21.2 (19.9, 22.7) 20.8 (19.5, 22.2) 7.4 (3.6, 11.4) 0.0001
 DHEAS (ug/dL) 666 54.4 (48.3, 61.4) 55.6 (49.8, 62.1) 60.5 (54.2, 67.6) 57.2 (51.4, 63.6) 1.7 (−4.2, 8.0) 0.58
 Prolactin (ng/mL) 580 8.1 (7.4, 8.8) 9.6 (8.9, 10.4) 8.8 (8.1, 9.5) 9.2 (8.5, 9.9) 1.3 (−2.8, 5.6) 0.54
 SHBG (nmol/L) 859 45.5 (42.2, 49.1) 46.1 (43.0, 49.4) 45.7 (42.7, 48.9) 42.9 (40.1, 45.8) −1.0 (−4.6, 2.5) 0.60
*

Adjusted for age at blood draw (continuous), smoking (never, former, current), alcohol (no regular use, ≤10, >10–20, >20–30, >30 grams/day), years since menopause (continuous), hysterectomy, unilateral oophorectomy, and irregular cycles. Models for all women additionally adjusted for BMI.

p-values for heterogeneity comparing difference in hormone levels per 5 ovulatory years among those with BMI<25 to those with BMI≥25, estradiol: p=0.07, estrone: p=0.02, estrone sulfate: p=0.04, testosterone: p=0.47, DHEAS: p=0.94, prolactin: p=0.37, SHBG: p=0.66.

Discussion

We used existing data on sex-hormone levels measured in NHS participants to address whether estimated LOY is associated with postmenopausal hormone levels in women not using exogenous hormones. In all women, adjusting for BMI and other factors, we found significant trends for women with greater LOY to have higher testosterone and estrogen levels. The trends with testosterone were also apparent among women stratified by BMI<25 kg/m2 and BMI≥25 kg/m2. The latter group also had significant trends between LOY and estrogen levels. That women with more LOY and above-average BMI had both elevated testosterone and estrogen is consistent with the known ability of fatty tissue to aromatize androgens into active estrogens.(33) Prospective studies of postmenopausal women have found that the combination of elevated serum testosterone and estradiol predict endometrial, breast, and ovarian cancer risks.(3437)

While the link between elevated testosterone and estradiol is easily explained, a link between LOY and testosterone first requires showing that the ovaries are a major source of testosterone in postmenopausal women. We believe this is established by cannulation of ovarian veins during pelvic surgery showing higher levels of testosterone and androstenedione than peripheral blood.(1618) Importantly, studies in women with ovarian and endometrial cancer at their surgeries revealed even higher levels of testosterone compared to women coming to oophorectomy for other indications.(38,39) Cannulation studies revealed that the level of estradiol in ovarian veins were not, or only modestly, elevated over peripheral levels indicating that the postmenopausal ovary is not a major source of estradiol. Although LOY was not examined in the cannulation studies, nor in the pooled study of hormones in postmenopausal women,(19) the latter study did show that oophorectomized women had substantially lower levels of testosterone. This has been confirmed in other populations, including NHS(27) indicating that the ovaries are, indeed, the key source of testosterone in postmenopausal women. This conclusion is further supported by the observation in Table 3 that lower testosterone was associated with unilateral oophorectomy compared to women with both ovaries intact.

A study of Dutch women did examine sex-hormone levels in relation to estimated lifetime ovulatory cycles (which would equate with LOYx13 for a cycle length of 28 days).(40) Women age 50–69 who participated in a regional breast cancer screening program were invited to complete questionnaires and provide blood. Out of 50,313 women invited, 17,357 (34.3%) agreed to be studied; and 97.5% of these provided a blood sample.(41) Hormones were measured in a 10% sample of the bloods and associations with number of cycles examined, which did not reveal any link between number of cycles and testosterone. This makes important a comparison of the features of this study with those of ours. The Dutch study had a higher percentage of women who were nulliparous and had fewer livebirths, greater use of birth control pills, and more current smokers. Out of 1400 eligible participants, 860 remained after excluding hysterectomized women, indicating that 540 (38.6%) had a hysterectomy before menopause. This is more than double the 17.5% in our study. This is important because of our observation in Table 3 that women who had a hysterectomy were more likely to have a greater number of ovulatory years. The exclusion of hysterectomized women in the Dutch study could have skewed the distribution of women in the Dutch Study towards those with fewer ovulatory cycles. Variables similar to ours were used to construct number of cycles, but information on incomplete pregnancies was not available in the NHS. As we did, the Dutch study included years of pill use in calculating ovulatory cycles, but also adjusted for OC use in their analysis of its effect on sex hormones. As pointed out by Yang et al., adjusting for variables which are components of LOY weakens estimates of its effect on disease risk (and vice versa).(6)

Despite a lack of confirmation from the Dutch study, we believe a good biologic explanation exists for the link between LOY and testosterone. This link likely involves the ovary’s germ cell reserve, the process of follicle maturation, and the fate of follicles recruited during a cycle but not selected for ovulation.(42,43) Primordial follicles are oocytes surrounded by a single layer of pre-granulosa cells. The maximum quota of primordial follicles, likely more than a million, is established at birth, of which about 300,000 remain when puberty begins. During each menstrual cycle, a cohort of follicles is selected to undergo maturation involving growth of the granulosa layer, formation of a thecal-cell layer, secretion of follicular fluid to form antral follicles, and selection of, usually, just one to become a Graffian follicle from which the oocyte will be released. Remnants of the dominant follicle form the corpus luteum which produces progesterone to support early pregnancy if fertilization occurs. During a cycle, some follicles that reach the early-antral stage will become quiescent and remain at that stage as a more dynamic reserve than primordial follicles. The remainder of follicles that developed further during a cycle will undergo apoptosis to become atretic follicles; and the corpus luteum regresses. The fate of developing follicles during an ovulatory cycle and the process of follicular atresia are likely most relevant to the potential consequences of repetitive ovulation.(44) Evidence that an antral follicle is on the path to atresia is apoptosis within the granulosa cell layer. The granulosa cell decrease leads to lower estradiol, both from reduced production and reduced aromatization of androgens secreted by thecal cells into estradiol. Thecal cells remain viable after disappearance of granulosa cells and retain their ability to secrete androgens, but their longer-term fate is unclear. In the ovarian vein cannulation studies, a significant excess of testosterone from the ovary over peripheral levels was found in women coming to surgery ten years after their menopause.(18)

Relevant to the fate of stromal and thecal remnants are two related conditions called ovarian stromal hyperplasia (OSH) and hyperthecosis (OHT). OSH refers to nodular or diffuse proliferation of the stromal cells of the ovary in varying degrees while OHT is distinguished by the presence of round to polyhedral theca-lutein-like cells occurring singly or in nests within a stroma that itself is proliferative.(45) For decades, these conditions have been of interest in the context of describing ovaries removed from women with endometrial cancer.(46) A link between OSH and breast cancer has also been described;(47) and OHT can be seen at the edge of epithelial ovarian malignancies.(48) Clearly needed are studies which quantify the degree of OSH/OHT in relation to number of estimated LOY. Elevated testosterone and estradiol, OSH and OHT, and predisposition to endometrial cancer are components of the disorder polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affecting younger women.(49,50) This raises the issue of how elevated testosterone and estradiol in postmenopausal women with greater LOY relates to PCOS. Although speculative, we suggest that PCOS involves abnormal cycles with too many follicles and premature luteinization during each cycle while greater LOY involves too many “normal” ovulatory cycles.

In assessing the potential effect of LOY on hormone levels, we adjusted for “lifestyle” variables, including BMI, smoking, and alcohol use, previously associated with level of postmenopausal hormones in a pooled analysis of 13 cohort studies.(19) All three factors were found to have some effects on estradiol and testosterone levels. However, a limitation of our study was that we did not consider all potential lifestyle or medical factors (e.g., thyroid conditions), and, in our adjusted models, residual confounding may remain. The main limitation of our study is a “generic” one. Is any epidemiologic study able to accurately estimate the number of ovulations a woman experienced based on her reproductive history? Unless pregnancy ensued, proving ovulation occurred during a cycle requires biologic measures of ovulation in blood or urine. Such studies involve small numbers of women followed over a relatively brief period-of-time. These studies indicate that anovulatory cycles are more likely to occur around the time of menarche and menopause; but estimates vary on how long it takes for ovulatory cycles to be established after menarche and how soon before menopause they become anovulatory.(5153) While it is easy to be skeptical that even the most detailed algorithm could accurately quantify the number of ovulations, the fact is that even the crudest algorithms with only ages at menarche and menopause, births, and OC use produce estimates that correlate with risk not only for ovarian cancer, but also breast and endometrial cancer.

In conclusion, we studied postmenopausal hormone levels in NHS participants in relation to estimated lifetime ovulations not interrupted by pregnancies, breastfeeding, or oral contraceptive use. We observed an association between greater LOY and testosterone levels and, in women with both greater LOY and BMI, higher estrogen levels. We have suggested that the association of LOY with testosterone reflects some degree of ovarian stromal hyperplasia or hyperthecosis which may be consequences of uninterrupted ovulation and persistence of stromal and thecal cells accumulated during repetitive cycles. Our findings need replication which could be readily accomplished by estimating LOY in existing cross-sectional studies of sex hormones in postmenopausal women, ideally in a more demographically diverse population than NHS. Future studies should focus on hormonal profiles, especially testosterone and estradiol, in postmenopausal women coming to oophorectomy whose LOY have been well-characterized to correlate with histologic evidence of stromal or thecal cell activity.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgements

The authors assume full responsibility for analysis and interpretation of these data. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (A.H. Eliassen, grant numbers UM1CA186107 and P01CA87969; S.E. Hankinson, grant number R01CA49449; and D.W. Cramer, grant number R35CA197605)

Funding

The project was supported by the National Institutes of Health (UM1CA186107 (A.H. Eliassen), P01CA87969 (A.H. Eliassen), R01CA49449 (S.E. Hankinson), and R35CA197605 (D.W. Cramer)). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interests related to the topic of this study. Dr. Cramer reports being paid for expert testimony in litigation related to talc and ovarian cancer.

References

  • 1.Fathalla MF. Incessant ovulation--a factor in ovarian neoplasia? Lancet 1971;2:163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Casagrande JT, Louie EW, Pike MC, Roy S, Ross RK, Henderson BE. “Incessant ovulation” and ovarian cancer. Lancet 1979;2:170–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schildkraut JM, Bastos E, Berchuck A. Relationship between lifetime ovulatory cycles and overexpression of mutant p53 in epithelial ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:932–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tung KH, Wilkens LR, Wu AH, McDuffie K, Nomura AM, Kolonel LN, et al. Effect of anovulation factors on pre- and postmenopausal ovarian cancer risk: revisiting the incessant ovulation hypothesis. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:321–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Terry KL, Titus-Ernstoff L, McKolanis JR, Welch WR, Finn OJ, Cramer DW. Incessant ovulation, mucin 1 immunity, and risk for ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:30–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang HP, Murphy KR, Pfeiffer RM, George N, Garcia-Closas M, Lissowska J, et al. Lifetime Number of Ovulatory Cycles and Risks of Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer Among Postmenopausal Women. Am J Epidemiol 2016;183:800–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fu Z, Brooks MM, Irvin S, Jordan S, Aben KKH, Anton-Culver H, et al. Lifetime ovulatory years and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a multinational pooled analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad011 Online ahead of print 2023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Medeiros F, Muto MG, Lee Y, Elvin JA, Callahan MJ, Feltmate C, et al. The tubal fimbria is a preferred site for early adenocarcinoma in women with familial ovarian cancer syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:230–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bahar-Shany K, Brand H, Sapoznik S, Jacob-Hirsch J, Yung Y, Korach J, et al. Exposure of fallopian tube epithelium to follicular fluid mimics carcinogenic changes in precursor lesions of serous papillary carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2014;132:322–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Johansson ED. The sterile menstrual cycle. The driving force behind pathology in the reproductive organs. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1984;123:147–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Clavel-Chapelon F, Group EN. Cumulative number of menstrual cycles and breast cancer risk: results from the E3N cohort study of French women. Cancer Causes Control 2002;13:831–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pettersson B, Adami HO, Bergstrom R, Johansson ED. Menstruation span--a time-limited risk factor for endometrial carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986;65:247–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chavez-MacGregor M, Elias SG, Onland-Moret NC, van der Schouw YT, Van Gils CH, Monninkhof E, et al. Postmenopausal breast cancer risk and cumulative number of menstrual cycles. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:799–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McPherson CP, Sellers TA, Potter JD, Bostick RM, Folsom AR. Reproductive factors and risk of endometrial cancer. The Iowa Women’s Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:1195–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Couzinet B, Meduri G, Lecce MG, Young J, Brailly S, Loosfelt H, et al. The postmenopausal ovary is not a major androgen-producing gland. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:5060–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Judd HL, Judd GE, Lucas WE, Yen SS. Endocrine function of the postmenopausal ovary: concentration of androgens and estrogens in ovarian and peripheral vein blood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1974;39:1020–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sluijmer AV, Heineman MJ, De Jong FH, Evers JL. Endocrine activity of the postmenopausal ovary: the effects of pituitary down-regulation and oophorectomy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:2163–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fogle RH, Stanczyk FZ, Zhang X, Paulson RJ. Ovarian androgen production in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:3040–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Key TJ, Appleby PN, Reeves GK, Roddam AW, Helzlsouer KJ, Alberg AJ, et al. Circulating sex hormones and breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of 13 studies. Br J Cancer 2011;105:709–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hankinson SE, Manson JE, Spiegelman D, Willett WC, Longcope C, Speizer FE. Reproducibility of plasma hormone levels in postmenopausal women over a 2–3-year period. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1995;4:649–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tworoger SS, Lee IM, Buring JE, Hankinson SE. Plasma androgen concentrations and risk of incident ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:211–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Karlson EW, Chibnik LB, McGrath M, Chang SC, Keenan BT, Costenbader KH, et al. A prospective study of androgen levels, hormone-related genes and risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:R97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jimenez MC, Sun Q, Schurks M, Chiuve S, Hu FB, Manson JE, et al. Low dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate is associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke among women. Stroke 2013;44:1784–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tworoger SS, Eliassen AH, Zhang X, Qian J, Sluss PM, Rosner BA, et al. A 20-year prospective study of plasma prolactin as a risk marker of breast cancer development. Cancer Res 2013;73:4810–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lin JH, Zhang SM, Rexrode KM, Manson JE, Chan AT, Wu K, et al. Association between sex hormones and colorectal cancer risk in men and women. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;11:419–24 e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang X, Tworoger SS, Eliassen AH, Hankinson SE. Postmenopausal plasma sex hormone levels and breast cancer risk over 20 years of follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;137:883–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kotsopoulos J, Shafrir AL, Rice M, Hankinson SE, Eliassen AH, Tworoger SS, et al. The relationship between bilateral oophorectomy and plasma hormone levels in postmenopausal women. Horm Cancer 2015;6:54–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rosner B, Colditz GA. Age at Menopause: Imputing Age at Menopause for Women With a Hysterectomy With Application to Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer. Annals of Epidemiology 2011;21:450–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, et al. Plasma sex steroid hormone levels and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1292–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Missmer SA, Eliassen AH, Barbieri RL, Hankinson SE. Endogenous estrogen, androgen, and progesterone concentrations and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1856–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rosner B. Percentage Points for a Generalized ESD Many-Outlier Procedure. Technometrics 1983;25:165–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rosner B, Cook N, Portman R, Daniels S, Falkner B. Determination of blood pressure percentiles in normal-weight children: some methodological issues. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:653–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nimrod A, Ryan KJ. Aromatization of androgens by human abdominal and breast fat tissue. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1975;40:367–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cauley JA, Lucas FL, Kuller LH, Stone K, Browner W, Cummings SR. Elevated serum estradiol and testosterone concentrations are associated with a high risk for breast cancer. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:270–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Allen NE, Key TJ, Dossus L, Rinaldi S, Cust A, Lukanova A, et al. Endogenous sex hormones and endometrial cancer risk in women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Endocr Relat Cancer 2008;15:485–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ose J, Poole EM, Schock H, Lehtinen M, Arslan AA, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, et al. Androgens Are Differentially Associated with Ovarian Cancer Subtypes in the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium. Cancer Res 2017;77:3951–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Johansson A, Schmitz D, Hoglund J, Hadizadeh F, Karlsson T, Ek WE. Investigating the Effect of Estradiol Levels on the Risk of Breast, Endometrial, and Ovarian Cancer. J Endocr Soc 2022;6:bvac100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Aiman J, Forney JP, Parker CR Jr. Secretion of androgens and estrogens by normal and neoplastic ovaries in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Botella-Llusia J, Oriol-Bosch A, Sanchez-Garrido F, Tresguerres JA. Testosterone and 17 beta-oestradiol secretion of the human ovary. II. normal postmenopausal women, postmenopausal women with endometrial hyperplasia and postmenopausal women with adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Maturitas 1980;2:7–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chavez-MacGregor M, van Gils CH, van der Schouw YT, Monninkhof E, van Noord PA, Peeters PH. Lifetime cumulative number of menstrual cycles and serum sex hormone levels in postmenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;108:101–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Boker LK, van Noord PA, van der Schouw YT, Koot NV, Bueno de Mesquita HB, Riboli E, et al. Prospect-EPIC Utrecht: study design and characteristics of the cohort population. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Eur J Epidemiol 2001;17:1047–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Findlay JK, Hutt KJ, Hickey M, Anderson RA. How Is the Number of Primordial Follicles in the Ovarian Reserve Established? Biol Reprod 2015;93:111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Monniaux D, Clément F, Dalbiès-Tran R, Estienne A, Fabre S, Mansanet C, et al. The Ovarian Reserve of Primordial Follicles and the Dynamic Reserve of Antral Growing Follicles: What Is the Link?1. Biology of Reproduction 2014;90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maxson WS, Haney AF, Schomberg DW. Steroidogenesis in porcine atretic follicles: loss of aromatase activity in isolated granulosa and theca. Biol Reprod 1985;33:495–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Boss JH, Scully RE, Wegner KH, Cohen RB. Structural Variations in the Adult Ovary. Obstet Gynecol 1965;25:747–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Woll E, Hertig AT, Smith GVS, Johnson LC. The ovary in endometrial carcinoma: With notes on the morphological history of the aging ovary. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 1948;56:617–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sommers SC, Teloh HA. Ovarian stromal hyperplasia in breast cancer. AMA Arch Pathol 1952;53:160–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Blanco LZ Jr., Kuhn E, Morrison JC, Bahadirli-Talbott A, Smith-Sehdev A, Kurman RJ. Steroid hormone synthesis by the ovarian stroma surrounding epithelial ovarian tumors: a potential mechanism in ovarian tumorigenesis. Mod Pathol 2017;30:563–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kaleli S, Erel CT, Oral E, Elter K, Akman C, Colgar U. Ovarian stromal hypertrophy in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Reprod Med 1998;43:893–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Haoula Z, Salman M, Atiomo W. Evaluating the association between endometrial cancer and polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 2012;27:1327–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Metcalf MG, Skidmore DS, Lowry GF, Mackenzie JA. Incidence of ovulation in the years after the menarche. J Endocrinol 1983;97:213–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Legro RS, Lin HM, Demers LM, Lloyd T. Rapid maturation of the reproductive axis during perimenarche independent of body composition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:1021–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.O’Connor KA, Ferrell R, Brindle E, Trumble B, Shofer J, Holman DJ, et al. Progesterone and ovulation across stages of the transition to menopause. Menopause 2009;16:1178–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article are available by application. Further information including the procedures to obtain and access data from the Nurses’ Health Studies is described at https://www.nurseshealthstudy.org/researchers

RESOURCES