Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study was to assess the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) guided by ultrasound/magnetic resonance (MR) fusion as a salvage treatment for refractory focal prostate cancer.
Methods
A total of five patients who had undergone radiation therapy (RT) for prostate carcinoma and biochemical recurrence, confirmed by both prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and MRI (3T mpMRI), were enrolled in this study. Focal ablation was performed using a 1064 nm diode laser. Post-ablation follow-up was conducted for a duration of 18 months, which included regular PSA sampling, 3T mpMRI, and ultrasound/MR fusion-guided biopsies systematic and targeted at the site of the focal treatment.
Results
The focal ablation procedure was carried out in an outpatient setting regimen with optimal clinical and biochemical outcomes. No recurrence was detected throughout the follow-up period.
Conclusion
TPLA focal treatment effectively manages local recurrences of RT refractory prostate cancer without side-effects or complications. Preservation of quality of life and functional outcomes, along with a >70% reduction in PSA, were achieved.
Advances in knowledge
Our study investigated TPLA as a salvage treatment for low-risk recurrent prostate cancer after RT, demonstrating its tolerability, feasibility, and effectiveness.
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common neoplasm diagnosed in males worldwide. 1 After primary treatment, between 27% and 53% of all patients develop a PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radical radiotherapy (RT) 2 . Biochemical recurrence after primary RT is defined as a PSA increase > 2 ng/mL from the nadir value reached after RT 2 . Patients affected by PCa and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary RT can be stratified into two prognostic groups: Low-Risk BCR, defined as biochemical recurrence-free survival > 18 months, with an ISUP grade <4; High-Risk BCR, with time to biochemical recurrence < 18 months and an ISUP grade ≥4 3 .
According to the European Association of Urology (EAU), low-risk patients (cT1-2, N0, M0, PSA <10 ng ml−1, life expectancy >10 years) may undergo local procedures, while high-risk patients (cT3-4, or N1, or recurrence PSA >10 ng ml−1, or life expectancy <10 years) have therapeutic options represented by hormonal therapy or observation. 4,5 In patients with BCR after RT, performing a new prostate biopsy is a fundamental predictor of outcome. In PCa patients presenting PSA failure after radical RT, there is an absence of consensus regarding the optimal management of local recurrence, and therapeutic options are represented by androgen deprivation therapy or focal treatments. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated all the studies investigating the main salvage treatments in the management of locally recurrent PCa, finding no significant differences in recurrence-free survival between different techniques. 6 Regarding hormonal therapy for PSA-recurrence after RT, the 2021 EAU guidelines for PCa recommend not offering androgen deprivation therapy to M0 patients with a PSA-doubling time >12 months. 5
During the last few years, interest in the application of focal treatments to PC patients has grown, with the aim of achieving long-term control of cancer and reducing morbidity associated with surgery and radiation therapy. Focal laser ablation (FLA) is a safe and effective treatment for cancer lesions in different organs, due to the very thin caliber of the applicators and the high precision of the delivered energy. 7–9 This represents a theoretical advantage since the complication rate may be limited using minimally invasive techniques. Our goal was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) as a salvage treatment for localized refractory PCa.
Methods and materials
We enrolled five male patients over 70 years old with a diagnosis of low-risk refractory PCa. All had undergone primary treatment with either external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy. The patients were diagnosed with a single peripheral gland intracapsular lesion with a diameter ≤2 cm and a Gleason score ≤3 + 4, confirmed by prostatic ultrasound/MRI fusion-guided biopsy and systematic biopsy (>12 samples). The PSA level was <10 ng ml−1. Cohort data are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Patient | Age | PSA pre-TPLA (ng/ml) | Lesion axial diameter (mm) | PI-RR | Gleason score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 72 | 5,4 | 10 | 4 | 3 + 4 |
2 | 81 | 4 | 15 | 5 | 3 + 3 |
3 | 71 | 3,9 | 14 | 5 | 3 + 3 |
4 | 79 | 4,9 | 18 | 4 | 3 + 4 |
5 | 76 | 5,1 | 9 | 4 | 3 + 4 |
PSA, prostate-specific antigen; TPLA, transperineal laser ablation.
Ethical approval for all procedures involving human participants was obtained in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, and in compliance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. All patients provided specific informed consent.
A 3T multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) was performed for ultrasound/MR-guided biopsy sampling and treatment planning (Figure 1–d), following the prostate imaging for local recurrence reporting (PI-RR) score. 10
The procedure was performed by a radiologist with over 10 years of experience in prostate interventional procedures, in an outpatient radiological intervention room. The patient was placed in the lithotomy position, and a three-way Foley 18 F catheter was inserted with continuous irrigation of saline solution. Using a dedicated system (EchoLaser SoracteLiteTM), ultrasound/MRI fusion was used to identify the focal lesion in the prostate to be treated (Figure 2e). Local superficial anesthesia of the perineal region, followed by a transrectal prostatic block with a lidocaine solution 2% (20 ml), was performed. Under real-time ultrasound guidance, a 21G Chiba needle was inserted through the perineum into the prostate target, and a bare optic fiber (Elesta SpA, Calenzano, Italy) was inserted, protruding 10 mm from the tip of the needle.
The insertion of the needle was performed using a biplanar probe with a dedicated guiding system device that allowed for regular positioning and spacing of the needles (Figure 2a–d). The optic fiber was then connected to a multisource laser system operating at 1064 nm (EchoLaser X4, ELESTA SpA, Calenzano, Italy). A planning tool device (ESI, EchoLaser Smart Interface, Elesta SpA, Calenzano, Italy) was connected to the general ultrasound scanner and used for treatment planning. Ciprofloxacin 500 mg was administered as antibiotic prophylaxis. Laser administration occurred at a fixed power of 3 W, and the treatment lasted until an energy of 1800 J was reached by the fiber. The pull-back technique was always performed, which involved pulling back the introducer by 1 cm and performing a second illumination to increase the ablation area.
After the laser ablation, all patients underwent a clinical observation period with an average time of 2 h. After 1 h, the subjects underwent a 3 T mpMRI with contrast agent (ProHance 0.5 M) to evaluate the extent of the coagulation zone (Figure 3a, b). After removal of the urinary catheter, the patient was discharged.
As proposed by Pacella et al, 11 we followed up with patients through PSA measurements and MRI at 1 h, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after the percutaneous treatment. The mpMRI sequences are summarized in Table 2. The volume estimation of the ablation site on MRI was calculated using a contrast-enhancement MR imaging post-processing automated segmentation software (Philips IntelliSpace Portal 7.0 MultiModality Tumor Tracking software).
Table 2.
Sequence | Plane | Time (min:s) | Repetition time (ms) | Echo time (ms) | Flip angle (°) | Number of slices | Slice thickness (mm) | Pixel size (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T 2 weighted turbo spin echo | Sag | 2:45 | 3293 | 110 | 90 | 25 | 3 | 0.7 × 0.9 |
T 2 weighted turbo spin echo | Ax | 5:42 | 3000 | 110 | 90 | 24 | 3 | 0.6 × 0.9 |
Diffusion-weighted imaginga | Ax | 6:24 | 3459 | 88 | 90 | 24 | 3 | 2.4 × 2.8 |
T 2 weighted turbo spin echo | Cor | 5:06 | 3000 | 110 | 90 | 24 | 3 | 0.5 × 0.8 |
T 1 weighted Dixon dynamic (30 phases) | Ax | 3:35 | 3.7 | 1.37 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 1.5 × 1.5 |
T 1 weighted turbo spin echo | Ax | 2:21 | 561 | 8 | 90 | 31 | 5 | 1.0 × 1.0 |
Ax, Axial; Cor, Coronal; Sag, Sagittal.
b-values: 0, 1000, 1500, 2500 s/mm2.
Systematic and target ultrasound/MRI fusion-guided prostate biopsy was performed at 18 months.
To assess quality of life (QoL), questionnaires including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) were completed at baseline and during the 18-month follow-up to investigate any procedure-related erectile dysfunction or urinary symptoms. A t-test for paired data was used to compare this data, with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 15 (StataCorp 2017, College Station, TX).
Treatment success was defined as a negative target and random biopsy, or the presence of recurrent/residual GS 3 + 3 in combination with a negative mpMRI. Residual in-field spots with GS ≥3 + 4 at TRUS/MRI-guided biopsy were defined as treatment failure, even with a negative mpMRI. 12
Results
Procedures were successfully completed (100% technical success) in all cases. During the clinical post-treatment observation period, no significant complications occurred, recorded according to Clavien-Dindo as Grade I. 13 All patients were dismissed on the same day of treatment.
We evaluated the percentage change over time in PSA pre- and post-procedure and post-procedure ablation volume.
PSA measurement at baseline, and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after treatment are summarized in Table 3 and Figure 4. There was a statistically relevant reduction of PSA trend at the end of follow-up (>70%) with an exception at the 1 month sample most likely related to gland ablation necrosis with a stable value compared to the baseline.
Table 3.
Pre-procedural | 1 h after treatment | 1 month follow-up | 3 month follow-up | 6 month follow-up | 12 month follow-up | 18 month follow-up | % reduction at 18 months | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSA (ng/mL) | 4,6 ± 0,7 | 4,4 ± 0,8 | 1,5 ± 0,5 | 1,2 ± 0,7 | 1,1 ± 0,8 | 0,9 ± 0,4 | >70% | ||
Necrotic cavity volume (cc) | 1,66 ± 0,3 | 4,03 ± 0,8 | 1,42 ± 0,7 | 0,71 ± 0,3 | 0,24 ± 0,2 | >70% | |||
IPSS | 6,8 ± 4,8 | 7,2 ± 3,7 | 0.459 | ||||||
IIEF-5 | 10,4 ± 1,9 | 9,8 ± 1,5 | 0.362 |
PSA, prostate-specific antigen.
After the first month, we registered a progressive decrease in time of PSA, with a decrease >70% at 18 months in all patients (Figure 4).
mpMRI performed at 1 h after treatment showed a devascularized volume up to 3x compared to the focal lesion pre-treatment 1 in all cases. Ablation cavity shape was reproducible in all the cases.
Subsequent mpMRI follow-up demonstrated the temporal evolution of treatment outcomes, including quantification of thermal damage extension (e.g. avascular area/volume on T1 THRIVE dynamic post-contrast acquisition), progression of the treated area/volume, and its shrinkage after the third month, without any reliable focal contrast-enhancement recurrence. MRI volume estimations at the ablation site are reported at 1 h and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months in Table 3.
We observed a progressive decrease in the ablation volume over time, with a reduction of >70% at 18 months (Figure 5). At the 18 month MRI scan, a scar replaced the ablation cavity, which was significantly reduced or completely absent (Figure 6a,b). Ultrasound/MRI fusion-guided biopsies confirmed the absence of neoplasia.
IIEF-5 and IPSS scores showed no significant difference between the pre-procedural values and the values at 18 months (IPSS p-value = 0.459; IIEF-5 p-value = 0.362, pre-procedural and final values reported in Table 3).
Discussion
Laser ablation therapy is a minimally invasive percutaneous thermal procedure that uses a 1064 nm laser light transmitted through optical fibers for a few minutes. This treatment causes heating of the affected tissue until it is irreversibly damaged in situ. Focal laser ablation (FLA) treatment results in a localized increase in temperature within the treated tissue, leading to irreversible coagulation necrosis. 14
The effectiveness of TPLA has been previously documented in studies focusing on the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) 7,11,15 and localized primary PCa. 8,12,14,16,17
Five cases of recurrent PCa post-RT were selected and treated with focal laser ablation. mpMRI was used for initial qualitative and quantitative assessment of the lesions and for post-treatment follow-up. Additionally, ultrasound/MRI fusion-guided biopsies were performed before the treatment and at the end of the follow-up period. 18
A sufficient safety margin for ablation was achieved for all lesions. No complications related to TPLA, other than local hematoma and/or edema, were reported.
No patients experienced statistically significant changes in urinary symptoms or erectile dysfunction during the follow-up period. The TPLA procedure preserves the urethra, bladder neck, and neurovascular bundles, as reported elsewhere. 7
All patients had a baseline PSA level below 10 ng ml−1 and a Gleason score of ≤7 (3 + 4). 1 month after the procedure, there was a transient increase in PSA levels. This is a common occurrence after localized prostatic procedures and therapies, attributed to the sudden release of PSA into the bloodstream by necrotic cells, and it is considered a favorable prognostic factor. 19 At the 18 month follow-up, we observed a reduction in PSA levels.
Due to our small sample size, we assessed the percentage change in PSA levels before and after the procedure. We observed a progressive decrease of more than 70% in PSA levels at 18 months, which is a statistically significant and promising finding (Figure 4).
To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to investigate TPLA as a salvage treatment for low-risk local recurrent PCa after RT.
Other focal treatments for recurrent localized PCa have been studied, including cryotherapy or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), utilizing different energy modalities. 20,21
In comparison to TPLA, cryotherapy involves the use of larger needle calibers and multiple temperature probes placed throughout the gland and between the prostate and rectum for temperature monitoring. A transurethral warming device is used to prevent urethral damage. Although the size of the ice ball can be adjusted, the treated area is usually wider than necessary, resulting in ablation of the ipsilateral neurovascular bundle. 21,22
Salvage HIFU is a relatively new treatment option for radiation-recurrent PCa, and limited data are available regarding its safety. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis also included salvage HIFU. 3 The adjusted pooled analysis for 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 52.72% (95% CI: 42.66–62.56%). However, due to the lack of follow-up data, it is not possible to formulate any recommendations for the routine clinical use of salvage HIFU.
In our experience, TPLA has shown promising results. It is a cost-effective treatment and can be performed on an outpatient basis, for selected patients. We achieved a 100% success rate with the procedure, and there were no instances of recurrence, complications, or side-effects related to the procedure (particularly urinary or erectile side-effects) during the entire 18 month follow-up period. The transperineal route, with sparing of the urethra and rectum, helped to minimize complications. One advantage of our study is that we followed up with our patients for a period of 18 months, whereas the literature studies on the clinical application of FLA had a maximum follow-up of 1 year. 14
mpMRI was used for lesion assessment, and TRUS/MRI fusion was utilized as a guide to enable accurate tailored focal therapy. The procedure was found to be easier when dealing with lesions located in the peripheral gland and of a larger size. The use of mpMRI as the primary follow-up imaging method resulted in high accuracy for validating the procedure. 23–27
We conducted a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the main imaging findings at each follow-up step.
Immediate post-treatment effects, observed at 1 h, were characterized by an elliptical hypointense ablation cavity, approximately twice the size of the original lesion. The cavity was filled with fluid and blood derivatives, and hyperintense fiber tracks were visible within the treated area. The morphology of the gland and the capsule are preserved (Figure 3a,b).
At 3 months, the main findings included the laser fiber track surrounded by a larger elliptical-shaped charred tissue cavitation, which appeared hypointense on T 2 weighted images. Initial signs of coagulative necrosis could be observed at the hypointense rim of the cavity, which was filled with blood derivatives and proteinaceous fluid (Figure 3c,d).
At 6 months, within the ellipsoid cavitation, we can observe necrotic tissue. Additionally, a hypointense interface rim along the needle tracks on T 2 weighted images and initial reabsorption of the cavity can be appreciated (Figure 7a,b).
At 12 and 18 months, we observed the presence of a T 2 weighted hypointense scar tissue that almost completely replaced the original cavity. There were slightly visible signs of fiber tracks (Figure 6a,b).
These imaging characteristics are similar to those documented in the TPLA of BPH. 7
Alike to the assessment of PSA levels, we also evaluated the percentage change in ablation volume over time after treatment. We observed a progressive decrease in ablation volume starting after 3 months, and by 18 months, it was less than 70% in all patients (Figure 5). It is crucial to continue the follow-up of patients to determine if the decreasing trend in PSA levels and ablation volume remains stable.
In order to establish robust statistics, it would be beneficial to increase the number of patients and potentially expand the selection criteria. Like other novel interventional techniques, TPLA requires trained operators. The operators in our study had approximately 10 years of experience, which contributed to reduced procedural time and shorter hospital stays for patients.
A limitation of our study is that we did not conduct a preliminary sample size calculation. Instead, we only included patients who met our specific criteria, such as having received whole-gland radiation therapy, having a low-risk score, no extraglandular extension, and a PSA level below 10 ng ml−1.
It will be important to conduct multicentric studies with a larger sample size and uniform selection criteria to confirm the efficacy of TPLA as a standard of care for the treatment of locally recurrent PCa.
Conclusions
To the best of our knowledge, this preliminary investigation represents the first exploration of TPLA as a salvage treatment for low-risk locally recurrent PCa after RT.
The procedure itself is well-tolerated, feasible, and easily performed in an outpatient setting using local anesthesia. Patients are typically discharged within a few hours on the same day of the procedure.
Our preliminary results have demonstrated that diode laser ablation can effectively and safely treat localized recurrences of PCa over a medium-term period. Additionally, the treatment has shown favorable medium-term quality of life and functional outcomes for patients.
It is important to note that further research and larger-scale studies are needed to validate these findings and establish the long-term efficacy and safety of TPLA as a salvage treatment option for low-risk locally recurrent PCa after RT.
Contributor Information
Guglielmo Manenti, Email: gu.manenti@gmail.com.
Marco Nezzo, Email: marco.nezzo@gmail.com.
Colleen Patricia Ryan, Email: colleen.patriciar@gmail.com.
Federico Romeo Fraioli, Email: federicofraioli@gmail.com.
Beatrice Carreri, Email: beatrice.bcarreri@gmail.com.
Paola Elda Gigliotti, Email: paolaegigliotti@gmail.com.
Cecilia Angeloni, Email: cecilia.angeloni@live.it.
Francesca Di Pietro, Email: francesca.dipietro@hotmail.com.
Martina De Angeli, Email: martina.deangeli91@gmail.com.
Tommaso Perretta, Email: tommasoperretta@alice.it.
Rolando Maria D'Angelillo, Email: profrmdangelillo@gmail.com.
Francesco Giuseppe Garaci, Email: francesco.garaci@uniroma2.it.
REFERENCES
- 1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Roach M, Hanks G, Thames H, Schellhammer P, Shipley WU, Sokol GH, et al. Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix consensus conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 65: 965–974. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Van den Broeck T, van den Bergh RCN, Arfi N, Gross T, Moris L, Briers E, et al. Prognostic value of biochemical recurrence following treatment with curative intent for prostate cancer: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2019; 75: 967–87. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Tilki D, Preisser F, Graefen M, Huland H, Pompe RS. External validation of the European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence risk groups to predict metastasis and mortality after radical Prostatectomy in a European cohort. European Urology 2019; 75: 896–900. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. EAU Guidelines . Edn. presented at the EAU annual Congress Milan 2021. ISBN 978-94-92671-13-4. 2021.
- 6. Valle LF, Lehrer EJ, Markovic D, Elashoff D, Levin-Epstein R, Karnes RJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of local salvage therapies after radiotherapy for prostate cancer (MASTER). Eur Urol 2021; 80: 280–92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Manenti G, Perretta T, Calcagni A, Ferrari D, Ryan CP, Fraioli F, et al. 3-T MRI and clinical validation of ultrasound-guided Transperineal laser ablation of benign Prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Radiol Exp 2021; 5(1): 41. doi: 10.1186/s41747-021-00239-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. van Riel LAMJG, van Kollenburg RAA, Vis AN, van Leeuwen PJ, de Reijke TM, de Bruin DM, et al. Safety and feasibility of Soractelite Transperineal focal laser ablation for prostate cancer and short-term quality of life analysis from a multicenter pilot study. Eur Urol Open Sci 2022; 39: 48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Chai W, Zhao Q, Song H, Cheng C, Tian G, Jiang T. Treatment response and preliminary efficacy of hepatic tumour laser ablation under the guidance of percutaneous and endoscopic Ultrasonography. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17(1): 133. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1677-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Panebianco V, Villeirs G, Weinreb JC, Turkbey BI, Margolis DJ, Richenberg J, et al. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging for local recurrence reporting (PI-RR): International consensus -Based guidelines on Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy and radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4: 868–76. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pacella CM, Patelli G, Iapicca G, Manenti G, Perretta T, Ryan CP, et al. Transperineal laser ablation for percutaneous treatment of benign Prostatic hyperplasia: a feasibility study. results at 6 and 12 months from a retrospective multi-centric study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020; 23: 356–363. doi: 10.1038/s41391-019-0196-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. van Luijtelaar A, Greenwood BM, Ahmed HU, Barqawi AB, Barret E, Bomers JGR, et al. Focal laser ablation as clinical treatment of prostate cancer: report from a Delphi consensus project. World J Urol 2019; 37: 2147–2153. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02636-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205–213. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Li J-K, Zhang C-C, Qiu S, Jin K, Cai B-Y, Yuan Q-M, et al. The comparison of survival between active surveillance or watchful waiting and focal laser ablation in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Asian J Androl 2022; 24: 494–499. doi: 10.4103/aja2021113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Patelli G, Ranieri A, Paganelli A, Mauri G, Pacella CM. Transperineal laser ablation for percutaneous treatment of benign Prostatic hyperplasia: A feasibility study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40: 1440–46. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1662-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wenger H, Yousuf A, Oto A, Eggener S. Laser ablation as focal therapy for prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2014; 24: 236–240. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chao B, Lepor H. 5-year outcomes following focal laser ablation of prostate cancer. Urology 2021; 155: 124–29. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Panebianco V, Barchetti F, Manenti G, Aversa T, Catalano C, Simonetti G. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: technical features and preliminary results. Radiol Med 2015; 120: 571–578. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0490-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Engeler DS, Schwab C, Thöni AF, Hochreiter W, Prikler L, Suter S, et al. PSA bounce after ¹²⁵I-Brachytherapy for prostate cancer as a favorable prognosticator 1 2 5 PSA bounce after ¹²⁵I-Brachytherapy for prostate cancer as a favorable prognosticator. Strahlenther Onkol 2015; 191: 787–791. doi: 10.1007/s00066-015-0860-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bakavicius A, Marra G, Macek P, Robertson C, Abreu AL, George AK, et al. Evidence on HIFU for focal treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review. Int Braz J Urol 2022; 48: 263–274. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Lodeizen O, de Bruin M, Eggener S, Crouzet S, Ghai S, Varkarakis I, et al. Ablation energies for focal treatment of prostate cancer. World J Urol 2019; 37: 409–418. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2364-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. da Silva RD, Kim FJ. Prostate cancer - local treatment after Radiorecurrence: salvage Cryoablation. Int Braz J Urol 2018; 44: 435–39. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.03.05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Di Trani MG, Nezzo M, Caporale AS, De Feo R, Miano R, Mauriello A, et al. Performance of diffusion Kurtosis imaging versus diffusion Tensor imaging in discriminating between benign tissue, low and high Gleason grade prostate cancer. Acad Radiol 2019; 26: 1328–37. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Manenti G, Carlani M, Mancino S, Colangelo V, Di Roma M, Squillaci E, et al. Diffusion Tensor magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 412–419. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000264059.46444.bf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Manenti G, Nezzo M, Chegai F, Vasili E, Bonanno E, Simonetti G. DWI of prostate cancer: optimal B-value in clinical practice. Prostate Cancer 2014; 2014: 868269. doi: 10.1155/2014/868269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Manenti G, Squillaci E, Di Roma M, Carlani M, Mancino S, Simonetti G. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant Prostatic tissue using thin-slice echo-planar imaging. Radiol Med 2006; 111: 1124–33. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0110-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Manenti G, Squillaci E, Carlani M, Mancino S, Di Roma M, Simonetti G. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with Spectroscopic imaging using a surface coil. initial clinical experience. Radiol Med 2006; 111: 22–32. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0003-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]