Skip to main content
Wellcome Open Research logoLink to Wellcome Open Research
. 2023 Feb 2;8:49. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18889.1

The genome sequence of the Miller, Acronicta leporina (Linnaeus, 1758)

Douglas Boyes 1; University of Oxford and Wytham Woods Genome Acquisition Lab; Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective; Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life programme; Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: DNA Pipelines collective; Tree of Life Core Informatics collective, Peter WH Holland 2; Darwin Tree of Life Consortiuma
PMCID: PMC10632593  PMID: 37954922

Abstract

We present a genome assembly from an individual female Acronicta leporina (the Miller; Arthropoda; Insecta; Lepidoptera; Noctuidae). The genome sequence is 466 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 32 chromosomal pseudomolecules, including the W and Z sex chromosomes. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 15.4 kilobases in length.

Keywords: Acronicta leporina, the Miller, genome sequence, chromosomal, Lepidoptera

Species taxonomy

Eukaryota; Metazoa; Ecdysozoa; Arthropoda; Hexapoda; Insecta; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Lepidoptera; Glossata; Ditrysia; Noctuoidea; Noctuidae; Acronictinae; Acronicta; Acronicta leporina (Linnaeus, 1758) (NCBI:txid987862).

Background

Acronicta leporina, described by Linnaeus in 1758, is a medium-sized noctuid moth (wingspan 35–45 mm) found across Europe. In the UK, the moth is known by the common name ‘the Miller’, although this name can be confusing as it is also used for different species of moth in other countries, including the army cutworm Euxoa auxiliaris in the USA.

Records of A. leporina range from north of the Arctic Circle in Scandinavia to the Mediterranean coast, with some putative records from East Asia ( GBIF Secretariat, 2023). In the UK, the moth is commonest in southern and central England, particularly in woodland and parkland habitats ( Randle et al., 2019). Although many species of moths have been declining in abundance in the UK, A. leporina has shown a marked increase since 1970 ( Randle et al., 2019). Changes in abundance probably also occurred before recording was standardized, since in the 19th century it was considered a rarity ( Newman, 1869).

The wing pattern of the adult moth is distinctive, with a delicate pattern of black crescent marks on a pale background; the ground colour varies from white to grey and shows regional differences. Melanic and very dark grey forms have been recorded, with speculation that they have been subject to natural selection for camouflage in regions suffering from industrial pollution ( West, 1999). In the UK, the adult moth has a single generation per year with adults on the wing in June and July. The larvae feed on leaves of birch, alder or willow through late summer and autumn, before tunnelling into soft wood and pupating; the moth overwinters as a pupa, sometimes remaining in this life cycle stage for two winters ( Skinner & Wilson, 2009). The larva is easily recognisable due to a profusion of extraordinarily long lime green or yellowish hairs swirling away from its body; it has been described as “looking for all the world like a green Persian cat” ( Allan, 1948). A particularly unusual feature is the asymmetrical pattern of hairs: those on one side of the body generally curl forward, while those on the opposite side curl backwards ( South, 1961).

A genome sequence of A. leporina will facilitate studies of adaptation to specific food plants, formation of larval hairs, and convergent evolution of melanism in Lepidoptera.

Genome sequence report

The genome was sequenced from one female Acronicta leporina ( Figure 1b) collected from Wytham Woods (latitude 51.77, longitude –1.34). A total of 45-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads was generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected five missing or mis-joins and removed two haplotypic duplications, reducing the scaffold number by 7.89%, and increasing the scaffold N50 by 4.15%.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

a) The larva of Acronicta leporina. Photograph by Amada44. b) Photograph of the Acronicta leporina (ilAcrLepo1) specimen used for genome sequencing.

The final assembly has a total length of 465.6 Mb in 35 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 16.3 Mb ( Table 1). Most (99.98%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 32 chromosomal-level scaffolds, representing 30 autosomes and the W and Z sex chromosomes. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 2Figure 5; Table 2). The assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 ( Manni et al., 2021) completeness of 99.1% using the lepidoptera_odb10 reference set. While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited.

Figure 2. Genome assembly of Acronicta leporina, ilAcrLepo1.1: metrics.

Figure 2.

The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 465,591,081 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (20,521,448 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (16,347,223 and 10,385,229 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the lepidoptera_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilAcrLepo1.1/dataset/CAMYGR01/snail.

Figure 5. Genome assembly of Acronicta leporina, ilAcrLepo1.1: Hi-C contact map.

Figure 5.

Hi-C contact map of the ilAcrLepo1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass. Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=AVoKtLp9R8C1Z4rRvP8ctQ.

Table 1. Genome data for Acronicta leporina, ilAcrLepo1.1.

Project accession data
Assembly identifier ilAcrLepo1.1
Species Acronicta leporina
Specimen ilAcrLepo1
NCBI taxonomy ID 987862
BioProject PRJEB56406
BioSample ID SAMEA10979192
Isolate information female, thorax (PacBio sequencing), head (Hi-C sequencing)
Assembly metrics * Benchmark
Consensus quality (QV) 66.4 ≥ 50
k-mer completeness 100% ≥ 95%
BUSCO ** C:99.1%[S:98.8%,D:0.3%],
F:0.2%,M:0.7%,n:5286
C ≥ 95%
Percentage of assembly
mapped to chromosomes
99.98% ≥ 95%
Sex chromosomes ZW localised homologous pairs
Organelles Mitochondrial genome assembled complete single alleles
Raw data accessions
PacificBiosciences SEQUEL II ERR10357391
Hi-C Illumina ERR10313053
Genome assembly
Assembly accession GCA_947256265.1
Accession of alternate haplotype GCA_947256475.1
Span (Mb) 465.6
Number of contigs 73
Contig N50 length (Mb) 9.3
Number of scaffolds 35
Scaffold N50 length (Mb) 16.3
Longest scaffold (Mb) 20.5

* Assembly metric benchmarks are adapted from column VGP-2020 of “Table 1: Proposed standards and metrics for defining genome assembly quality” from ( Rhie et al., 2021).

** BUSCO scores based on the lepidoptera_odb10 BUSCO set using v5.3.2. C = complete [S = single copy, D = duplicated], F = fragmented, M = missing, n = number of orthologues in comparison. A full set of BUSCO scores is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilAcrLepo1.1/dataset/CAMYGR01/busco.

Figure 3. Genome assembly of Acronicta leporina, ilAcrLepo1.1: GC coverage.

Figure 3.

BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot. Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilAcrLepo1.1/dataset/CAMYGR01/blob.

Figure 4. Genome assembly of Acronicta leporina, ilAcrLepo1.1: cumulative sequence.

Figure 4.

BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot. The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilAcrLepo1.1/dataset/CAMYGR01/cumulative.

Table 2. Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Acronicta leporina, ilAcrLepo1.

INSDC accession Chromosome Size (Mb) GC%
OX366512.1 1 19.38 36.7
OX366513.1 2 19 37
OX366514.1 3 18.54 37.1
OX366515.1 4 18 37.1
OX366516.1 5 17.55 36.6
OX366517.1 6 17.49 36.4
OX366518.1 7 17.22 36.7
OX366519.1 8 16.61 36.6
OX366520.1 9 16.5 36.5
OX366521.1 10 16.46 37
OX366522.1 11 16.35 36.9
OX366523.1 12 15.87 36.6
OX366524.1 13 15.7 36.9
OX366525.1 14 15.41 36.7
OX366526.1 15 14.98 37
OX366527.1 16 14.78 36.8
OX366528.1 17 14.47 37.2
OX366529.1 18 14.29 37.5
OX366530.1 19 14.23 37.4
OX366531.1 20 13.97 37.7
OX366532.1 21 13.81 37.1
OX366533.1 22 11.81 37.8
OX366534.1 23 11.62 37.4
OX366535.1 24 10.79 37.5
OX366536.1 25 10.39 37.6
OX366537.1 26 9.8 37.8
OX366538.1 27 8.29 38.4
OX366539.1 28 7.82 39.2
OX366540.1 29 7.48 38.8
OX366541.1 30 6.5 38.7
OX366511.1 W 19.87 38.8
OX366510.1 Z 20.52 36.5
OX366542.1 MT 0.02 20.2

Methods

Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction

A single A. leporina (ilAcrLepo1) was collected from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire (biological vice-county: Berkshire), UK (latitude 51.77, longitude –1.34) on 16 June 2021 using a light trap. The specimen was collected and identified by Douglas Boyes (University of Oxford) and snap-frozen on dry ice. The sex of the individual was not determined morphologically at the time of collection, but was inferred retrospectively from the genome assembly.

DNA was extracted at the Tree of Life laboratory, Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI). The ilAcrLepo1 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice with head tissue set aside for Hi-C sequencing. Thorax tissue was cryogenically disrupted to a fine powder using a Covaris cryoPREP Automated Dry Pulveriser, receiving multiple impacts. High molecular weight (HMW) DNA was extracted using the Qiagen MagAttract HMW DNA extraction kit. HMW DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 30. Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation using AMPure PB beads with a 1.8X ratio of beads to sample to remove the shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA sample. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.

Sequencing

Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II (HiFi) instrument. Hi-C data were also generated from head tissue of ilAcrLepo1 using the Arima v2 kit and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.

Genome assembly

Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). The assembly was scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using YaHS ( Zhou et al., 2022). The assembly was checked for contamination as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and Pretext ( Harry, 2022). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2022), which performed annotation using MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020). The genome was analysed and BUSCO scores were generated within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020). Table 3 contains a list of all software tool versions used, where appropriate.

Table 3. Software tools and versions used.

Software tool Version Source
BlobToolKit 3.5.0 Challis et al., 2020
Hifiasm 0.16.1-r375 Cheng et al., 2021
HiGlass 1.11.6 Kerpedjiev et al., 2018
MitoHiFi 2 Uliano-Silva et al., 2022
PretextView 0.2 Harry, 2022
purge_dups 1.2.3 Guan et al., 2020
YaHS yahs-1.1.91eebc2 Zhou et al., 2022

Ethics/compliance issues

The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project. Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Wellcome through core funding to the Wellcome Sanger Institute (206194, <a href=https://doi.org/10.35802/206194>https://doi.org/10.35802/206194</a>) and the Darwin Tree of Life Discretionary Award (218328, <a href=https://doi.org/10.35802/218328>https://doi.org/10.35802/218328</a>).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Data availability

Underlying data

European Nucleotide Archive: Acronicta leporina (the miller). Accession number PRJEB56406; https://identifiers.org/ena.embl/PRJEB56406. ( Wellcome Sanger Institute, 2022)

The genome sequence is released openly for reuse. The Acronicta leporina genome sequencing initiative is part of the Darwin Tree of Life (DToL) project. All raw sequence data and the assembly have been deposited in INSDC databases. The genome will be annotated using available RNA-Seq data and presented through the Ensembl pipeline at the European Bioinformatics Institute. Raw data and assembly accession identifiers are reported in Table 1.

Author information

Members of the University of Oxford and Wytham Woods Genome Acquisition Lab are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4789928.

Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4893703.

Members of the Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life programme are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4783585.

Members of Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: DNA Pipelines collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4790455.

Members of the Tree of Life Core Informatics collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5013541.

Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Consortium are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4783558.

References

  1. Allan PBM: Moths and Memories. London: Watkins and Doncaster.1948. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  2. Allio R, Schomaker-Bastos A, Romiguier J, et al. : MitoFinder: Efficient automated large‐scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Challis R, Richards E, Rajan J, et al. : BlobToolKit - interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g3.119.400908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng H, Concepcion GT, Feng X, et al. : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GBIF Secretariat: Acronicta leporina (Linnaeus, 1758).GBIF Backbone Taxonomy.2023; (Accessed: 13 January 2023). Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  6. Guan D, McCarthy SA, Wood J, et al. : Identifying and removing haplotypic duplication in primary genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(9):2896–2898. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harry E: PretextView (Paired REad TEXTure Viewer): A desktop application for viewing pretext contact maps.2022; (Accessed: 19 October 2022). Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  8. Howe K, Chow W, Collins J, et al. : Significantly improving the quality of genome assemblies through curation. Gigascience. Oxford University Press.2021;10(1):giaa153. 10.1093/gigascience/giaa153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kerpedjiev P, Abdennur N, Lekschas F, et al. : HiGlass: Web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):125. 10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, et al. : BUSCO Update: Novel and Streamlined Workflows along with Broader and Deeper Phylogenetic Coverage for Scoring of Eukaryotic, Prokaryotic, and Viral Genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(10):4647–4654. 10.1093/molbev/msab199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Newman E: An Illustrated Natural History of British Moths. London: Hardwicke and Bogue.1869. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  12. Randle Z, Evans-Hill LJ, Parsons MS, et al. : Atlas of Britain & Ireland’s Larger Moths. Newbury: NatureBureau.2019. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  13. Rao SSP, Huntley MH, Durand NC, et al. : A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159(7):1665–1680. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rhie A, McCarthy SA, Fedrigo O, et al. : Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature. 2021;592(7856):737–746. 10.1038/s41586-021-03451-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Skinner B, Wilson D: Colour Identification Guide to the Moths of the British Isles. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.2009. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  16. South R: Moths of the British Isles. New edition. London: Frederick Warne and Co.1961. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  17. Uliano-Silva M, Ferreira JGRN, Krasheninnikova K, et al. : MitoHiFi: a python pipeline for mitochondrial genome assembly from PacBio High Fidelity reads. bioRxiv. [Preprint].2022. 10.1101/2022.12.23.521667v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. West BK: The melanic forms of Acronicta leporina L.(Lep.: Noctuidae) in the London area. Entomol Res. 1999;111:265–266. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  19. Wellcome Sanger Institute: The genome sequence of the Miller, Acronicta leporina (Linnaeus, 1758). European Nucleotide Archive, [dataset], accession number PRJEB56406,2022.
  20. Zhou C, McCarthy SA, Durbin R: YaHS: yet another Hi-C scaffolding tool. bioRxiv. [Preprint].2022. 10.1101/2022.06.09.495093v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Nov 8. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.20945.r68610

Reviewer response for version 1

Fan Song 1

This article presented a genome assembly of an individual female Acronicta Leporina, with a genome size of 466 Mb. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 32 chromosomal pseudomolecules, including the W and Z sex chromosomes. Additionally, the mitochondrial genome has been assembled to a length of 15.4 kb. Here, I have some comments that may be useful in improving the quality of the paper.

  1. The description of how to identify sex chromosomes is not present in the article. Please add more details about identify sex chromosomes methods.

  2. It is suggested that the horizontal and vertical coordinates of Figure 5 could have a label showing the size of the genome and indicating which is the W and Z sex chromosome.

  3. Please add information about the sequencing data coverage of Hi-C in the article.

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Insect genomics

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Oct 13. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.20945.r64491

Reviewer response for version 1

Fabrice Legeai 1

This article is technically complete and provide a good and complete overview of the generation of the genome, achieved with standard and approved methods.

My only concern is that the coverage of the  chromosomes which apparently points out the sex chromosomes Z and W is not reported in the  Table 2 (although attendant in the blobtoolkit interactive table).

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Bioinformatics, insect genomics

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Wellcome Sanger Institute: The genome sequence of the Miller, Acronicta leporina (Linnaeus, 1758). European Nucleotide Archive, [dataset], accession number PRJEB56406,2022.

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    European Nucleotide Archive: Acronicta leporina (the miller). Accession number PRJEB56406; https://identifiers.org/ena.embl/PRJEB56406. ( Wellcome Sanger Institute, 2022)

    The genome sequence is released openly for reuse. The Acronicta leporina genome sequencing initiative is part of the Darwin Tree of Life (DToL) project. All raw sequence data and the assembly have been deposited in INSDC databases. The genome will be annotated using available RNA-Seq data and presented through the Ensembl pipeline at the European Bioinformatics Institute. Raw data and assembly accession identifiers are reported in Table 1.


    Articles from Wellcome Open Research are provided here courtesy of The Wellcome Trust

    RESOURCES