Skip to main content
National Science Review logoLink to National Science Review
. 2023 Sep 7;10(12):nwad234. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwad234

Harnessing chemical pressure

Ho-kwang Mao 1,
PMCID: PMC10632785  PMID: 37954200

Pressure profoundly changes all physical characteristics of a condensed matter and provides a vast and fertile dimension to search for materials with extremely favorable properties for technological applications [1,2]. However, these favorable properties are only optimally tuned at a specific high pressure and will vanish or revert at the ambient pressure, rendering them merely of academic interest.

A promising solution is to take advantage of the ‘chemical pressure’. When a relatively large atom is replaced by a smaller atom, it will be locally ‘squeezed’ by the surrounding crystal lattice with an additional chemical pressure, Pchem, and exhibits pressure-induced functional changes even at ambient pressure. Using this chemical pressure to achieve desired properties has been a long-standing idea. For instance, the concept of chemical pressure inspired the replacement of La in the 1987 Nobel Prize-winning lanthanum barium cuprite [3] that reached 30 K superconducting Tc, with Y [4] that reached an astounding Tc of 93 K and kicked off the era of the YBCO superconductor revolution. The discovery of hydrogen-dominant hydrides as near room Tc superconductors [5,6] was initially an attempt to ‘precompress’ hydrogen with chemical pressure [7] for metallization of hydrogen. Regardless of these impressive successes, however, fundamental questions remain. How do we measure the chemical pressure localized at a specific atom? Can it be sufficiently large to create metallic hydrogen or to stabilize exotic functional materials for applications under ambient conditions?

To address these questions, Zhou et al. [8] designed an innovative study on pressure-tuned luminescence of Bi3+ dopant in yttrium and gadolinium orthovanadates with a general formula of AVO4 where the dodecahedral A sites are filled with various large cations, Y3+ and Gd3+, as well as the dopant Bi3+. The Bi3+ emission spectra strongly depend upon the A site volume, which can be compressed by application of external pressure Pphy or by varying the chemical substitutions of Y, Gd and Sc of different ionic radii to generate local chemical pressure Pchem. The multivariable experiments include measurements of the AO8 polyhedral volume (V) and the Bi3+ emission peak wavelength (λ) as functions of external pressure (Pphy) and chemical substitution (x) of Y0.98xScxBi0.02VO4 and Gd0.98xScxBi0.02VO4 that generates the chemical pressure. The comprehensive approach first calibrated λ as a function of Pphy without Pchem (x = 0) for yttrium orthovanadate and gadolinium orthovanadate (Fig. 1a and c). Then the λP calibration is used to determine Pchem as a function of x for Pphy = 0 (Fig. 1b and d). The Pchem value calculated on the basis of the λP calibration agrees very well with that on the basis of the VP relations (Fig. 1e and f).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) Pressure-dependent spectra shift (Δλphy) of Y0.98Bi0.02VO4 and (c) Gd0.98Bi0.02VO4 fitted by the Mao–Bell equation [9]. (b) The fitted curve also reflects the relationship between the spectra shift (Δλchem) and (d) the local chemical pressure (Pchem) of Y0.98xScxBi0.02VO4 and Gd0.98xScxBi0.02VO4. The comparison of relationships between Pchem and x are determined by using V- and λ-based methods for (e) Y0.98xScxBi0.02VO4 and (f) Gd0.98xScxBi0.02VO4. Reproduced from Ref. [8].

The study [8] provides valuable answers to the aforementioned questions. The functional effect induced by chemical pressure on localized atoms, such as luminescence, is indeed equivalent to that induced by the physical pressure on the bulk crystal and can be used to quantify the chemical pressure. The finding of chemical pressure as big as 30–40 GP offers hope for stabilizing hydrogen-dominant high Tc superconductors. Recent efforts on lowering the synthesis pressure to <100 GPa with ternary hydrides [6] are promising with the additional chemical pressures.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Mao H-K, Chen X-J, Ding Yet al. Rev Mod Phys 2018; 90: 015007. 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mao H-K, Chen B, Gou Het al. Matter Radiat Extrem 2021; 6: 013001. 10.1063/5.0040607 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bednorz JG, Müller KA. Z Phys B Condens Matter 1986; 64: 189–93. 10.1007/BF01303701 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wu MK, Ashburn JR, Torng CJet al. Phys Rev Lett 1987; 58: 908–10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.908 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Drozdov AP, Kong PP, Minkov VSet al. Nature 2019; 569: 528–31. 10.1038/s41586-019-1201-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhang X, Zhao Y, Li Fet al. Matter Radiat Extrem 2021; 6: 068201. 10.1063/5.0065287 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ashcroft NW. Phys Rev Lett 2004; 92: 187002. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.187002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zhou X, Zhao M-H, Yao S-Met al. Natl Sci Rev 2023; 10: nwad190. 10.1093/nsr/nwad190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mao HK, Bell PM, Shaner Jet al. J Appl Phys 1978; 49: 3276–83. 10.1063/1.325277 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from National Science Review are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES