Skip to main content
Access Microbiology logoLink to Access Microbiology
. 2023 Oct 5;5(10):000659.v3. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000659.v3

The genome of a steinernematid-associated Pseudomonas piscis bacterium encodes the biosynthesis of insect toxins

Ryan Musumba Awori 1,2,*, Prasad Hendre 2, Nelson O Amugune 3
PMCID: PMC10634486  PMID: 37970093

Abstract

Several species of soil-dwelling Steinernema nematodes are used in the biocontrol of crop pests, due to their natural capacity to kill diverse lepidopteran species. Although this insect-killing trait is known to be augmented by the nematodes’ Xenorhabdus endosymbionts, the role of other steinernematid-associated bacterial genera in the nematode lifecycle remains unclear. This genomic study aimed to determine the potential of Pseudomonas piscis to contribute to the entomopathogenicity of its Steinernema host. Insect larvae were infected with three separate Steinernema cultures. From each of the three treatments, the prevalent bacteria in the haemocoel of cadavers, four days post-infection, were isolated. These three bacterial isolates were morphologically characterised. DNA was extracted from each of the three bacterial isolates and used for long-read genome sequencing and assembly. Assemblies were used to delineate species and identify genes that encode insect toxins, antimicrobials, and confer antibiotic resistance. We assembled three complete genomes. Through digital DNA–DNA hybridisation analyses, we ascertained that the haemocoels of insect cadavers previously infected with Steinernema sp. Kalro, Steinernema sp. 75, and Steinernema sp. 97 were dominated by Xenorhabdus griffiniae Kalro, Pseudomonas piscis 75, and X. griffiniae 97, respectively. X. griffiniae Kalro and X. griffiniae 97 formed a subspecies with other X. griffiniae symbionts of steinernematids from Kenya. P. piscis 75 phylogenetically clustered with pseudomonads that are characterised by high insecticidal activity. The P. piscis 75 genome encoded the production pathway of insect toxins such as orfamides and rhizoxins, antifungals such as pyrrolnitrin and pyoluteorin, and the broad-spectrum antimicrobial 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol. The P. piscis 75 genome encoded resistance to over ten classes of antibiotics, including cationic lipopeptides. Steinernematid-associated P. piscis bacteria hence have the biosynthetic potential to contribute to nematode entomopathogenicity.

Keywords: bacterial insect toxins, biosynthetic gene clusters, digital DNA-DNA hybridisation, nematode microbiota, orfamides, Pseudomonas piscis, Xenorhabdus

Data summary

The accession numbers for complete genomes of Xenorhabdus griffiniae Kalro, X. griffiniae 97, and Pseudomonas piscis 75 are CP133479, CP133647, and CP133164, respectively. The raw reads used to assemble these genomes are available from the SRA database through accession numbers SRR25805238, SRR25809462, and SRR25793747. Raw data from various genome analyses are found in Supplementary Workbook 1.

Introduction

The abundance of nematodes is exceeded by no other animal [1]. Yet only the steinernematids and heterorhabditids, which consist of the genera Heterorhabditis, Neosteinernema, and Steinernema [2], are classified as entomopathogenic [3]. Steinernema IJs are naturally found in soils the world over [4]. IJs seek out insect prey and gain entry into the haemocoel through either natural openings or by burrowing through the insect cuticle [5]. Once within the haemocoel, IJs release their bacterial symbionts which include Xenorhabdus, Pseudomonas, Alcaligenes , Stenotrophomonas , Serratia, Ochrobactrum, Enterobacter, Pseudochrobactrum, and Brevundimonas [6–11]. Upon detection of insect haemolymph, Xenorhabdus bacteria secrete [12] a pot pourri of natural products that ultimately contribute to both the fecundity and entomopathogenicity of their nematode host. For other bacterial endosymbionts, their specific role in the nematode lifecycle remains unclear. However, several strains have been demonstrated as entomopathogenic. For example, Alcaligenes faecalis AL618 and Serratia marcescens CAST5, which were isolated from the haemocoel of Steinernema feltiae-infected Galleria mellonella cadavers, were entomopathogenic to both lepidopterans and dipterans [10]. A. faecalis MOR02, which was associated with both S. feltiae and S. carpocapsae IJs, was entomopathogenic to G. mellonella [8]. Strains of Pseudomonas protegens and P. chlororaphis that were endosymbionts of S. carpocapsae, S. glaseri, and S. weiseri, were highly entomopathogenic to Spodoptera littoralis [7]. Moreover, these P. chlororaphis and P. protegens strains were resistant to antimicrobials produced by bacteria with whom they shared a nematode host [7]. P. protegens C01 from S. feltiae was entomopathogenic to both lepidopterans and dipterans via both oral and intrahaemocoel routes [11]. The P. protegens C01 genome contained fitD, a robust marker of entomopathogenicity in a pseudomonad [13] since it is part of a seemingly non-cryptic BGC that encodes the production of the Fit toxin [14]. Other insect toxins produced by entomopathogenic strains of Pseudomonas include orfamide and rhizoxin [15]. This predicted and experimentally validated entomopathogenicity of pseudomonads led to the hypothesis that they contribute to the entomopathogenicity of steinernematids [16]. Since the production of Pseudomonas natural products such as insect toxins is strain-specific [13], the isolation of more Steinernema-associated strains that either encode or secrete insect toxins would further support this hypothesis.

Three EPNs isolated from soils in Kenya – Steinernema sp. 97, Steinernema sp. Kalro, and Steinernema sp. 75 – were entomopathogenic to Tuta absoluta [17, 18]. In this study, we isolated three bacteria from insect cadavers infected with Steinernema sp. 97, Steinernema sp. Kalro, and Steinernema sp. 75. For these bacterial isolates, we characterised their genomes, delineated their species, and conducted genome analyses to determine the potential of the non- Xenorhabdus bacterium to contribute to the entomopathogenicity of its nematode host. Specifically, we identified and analysed genes encoding not only secondary metabolites, including insect toxins, but also the resistome in a Steinernema-associated strain of Pseudomonas piscis . Our findings demonstrate that Steinernema-associated Pseudomonas piscis have the potential to produce insect toxins and subsequently dominate the insect cadaver through both antimicrobial production and resistance.

Methods

Isolation and morphological characterisation of nematode-associated bacteria

Three nematode cultures that had been previously been isolated, characterised, and reposited at the EPN nematode collection of the Horticulture Research Institute, KALRO, Thika, Kenya, were used in this study: Steinernema sp. 75, Steinernema sp. Kalro, and Steinernema sp. 97, which originated from soils in the Rift Valley, Thika, and Central regions of Kenya, respectively [17]. Bacteria were indirectly isolated from each of the three, through the haemolymph of G. mellonella larvae as previously described [19]. Briefly, 8–12 larvae were infected with a nematode culture for each treatment. Treatments were monitored for insect death and subsequent nematode emergence from at least one cadaver. This happened four days post-infection for Steinernema sp. Kalro treatments and seven days post-infection for both Steinernema sp. 75 and Steinernema sp. 97 treatments. Limp cadavers that were void of putrefaction, were then selected for bacterial isolation. They were surface-sterilised and dissected to obtain internal haemolymph/fluid of degraded tissues. This was then streaked onto LB [20] agar plates (1 % tryptone, 0.5 % NaCl, 0.5 % yeast extract, 1.2 % agar [w/v]), which were incubated at 28°C for 3 days. To determine ampicillin resistance, pure cultures were plated on LB agar supplemented with 50 and 100 µg ml−1 ampicillin and incubated at 28 °C for 3 days. Pure cultures were similarly grown on nutrient agar plates. Catalase production was determined by mixing a single colony with 30 % (v/v) hydrogen peroxide (10 µl). Production of bubbles indicated the bacterium strain as catalase-positive.

Bacterial DNA extraction

Pure plate cultures of the three isolates were used for DNA extraction with a Zymo Quick DNA Miniprep Plus extraction kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, USA), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of DNA samples was measured with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermofisher Scientific, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions for broad-range settings. DNA samples of X. griffiniae Kalro, P. piscis 75, and X. griffiniae 97 had concentrations of 967 µg ml−1, 155 µg ml−1, and 242 µg ml−1, respectively. These were then stored at −20 °C, until shipment to Plasmidsaurus (Oregon, USA) for genome sequencing.

Genome sequencing

Libraries were first created using Oxford Nanopore Q20 +v0.14 library chemistry kits. Samples were multiplexed. Primer-free long-read sequencing was then conducted on an ONP platform employing R 10.4.1 flow cells. Bases were called with Bonito v 3.5.2 using a high-accuracy base call model – dna_r10.4.1_e8.2_260bps_sup@v3.5.2. Reads were demultiplexed with Guppy using a 70 % threshold. Individual read datasets were obtained in the fastq format. For the P. piscis 75 sample, the raw read set contained 901729912 bases from a single sequencing run that lasted 2 h 26 min. For the X. griffiniae Kalro sample, the cumulative raw read set contained 319129049 bases from two sequencing runs that individually lasted 9 h 20 min and 5 h 13 min. For the X. griffiniae 97 sample, the cumulative raw read set contained 235609660 bases from two sequencing runs that individually lasted 9 h 20 min and 4 h 50 min.

Genome assembly

Raw read sets were used to assemble genomes with Trycycler [21] on the Galaxy EU webserver [22]. To assemble the P. piscis 75 genome, the same raw read set was first used to create separate assemblies in Flye [23], Canu [24], and Raven [25], using the default parameters of ONP reads. Raw reads were filtered in Filtlong by culling the worst 5 % of reads. This dataset was used to create both an assembly in Flye and 12 subsamples using the Trycycler subsample programme. Three, two, and three subsamples were used to create separate assemblies in Flye, Canu, and Raven, respectively, using default parameters for ONP reads. The twelve resultant assemblies were then used as input data for the Trycycler cluster programme. Assemblies that did not form clear clusters were culled and the remaining 11 assemblies were re-run through Trycycler cluster. Eleven contigs that formed a clear cluster, which represented the bacterial chromosome, were used in Trycycler reconcile/msa programme to not only circularise the sequences but also create an MSA. Using the Trycycler partition programme, the specific reads that were used to create contigs from this cluster were partitioned from the main set of reads. This partitioned set of reads, the MSA, and circularised contigs were used as input data in the Trycycler consensus programme to create a complete genome assembly. A similar workflow was used to assemble genomes of X. griffiniae Kalro and X. griffiniae 97. For these two, the final assemblies were additionally polished with Medaka [26]. All three assemblies were deposited in NCBI Genbank as complete genomes.

Genome analyses for species delineation, and prediction of secondary metabolites and the resistome

To determine the characteristics of genome assemblies and their suitability for downstream genome analyses, genome assemblies were first analysed with the comprehensive genome analysis and annotation tools, on the BV-BRC platform [27]. Species delineation was conducted on TYGS [28] as previously described [19]. Briefly, genomes in fasta format were uploaded to the server for unrestricted analyses. Sequences of 16S rDNA were extracted from the genomes. These were used to identify type strains that are most closely related to query genomes. Genome Distance blast Phylogeny (GDBP) distances were calculated between each of the query genomes and their mostly closely related type strains that have publicly available genomes. For the phylogenomic reconstruction, a distance tree was reconstructed using distances calculated from GDBP distance formula d5. The following genomes of non-type strains that were most closely related to the three query genomes were included in the dDDH analyses on the TYGS: X griffiniae XN45 (GCA_014656825.1), X. griffiniae VH1 (GCA_015163655.1), and Pseudomonas sp. CMR5c (GCA_003850545.1). The resultant phylogenomic tree from the analyses of pseudomonad strains was viewed in ITOL [29]. A scalable vector graphic of the tree was edited in Inkscape [30].

To identify BGCs that likely encode the production of secondary metabolites, genomes were uploaded to antiSMASH [31] and analysed under ‘relaxed’ strictness with the following analyses: known Clusterblast, Clusterblast, MIBiG cluster comparison, active sitefinder, RREFinder, cluster Pfam analysis, Pfam-based GO term annotation, TIGRFam analysis, and TBFS analysis. The modules and domains of predicted non-ribosomal peptide synthetases were further analysed to predict the amino acid building blocks and sequences of non-ribosomal peptides. A targeted search for the fitD gene was conducted. This is because genomes of close phylogenetic relatives of P. piscis 75 encoded the Fit toxin, which contributed to their entomopathogenicity [13]. Moreover, the Fit toxin is homologous to the make caterpillar floppy (mcf) insect toxin that is encoded in genomes of Xenorhabdus [32]. To identify the fitD gene, the nucleotide sequences of Pseudomonas genomes were queried with primer sequences TGGCTTTTATGTCCAAGGAC and TGGTTGGCGAAGTACTGCTC [32] in Geneious [33]. For identification of the hcnA-C BGC, the annotation track of the genome was likewise queried with‘hcnA’. Known chemical structures of predicted biosynthesized compounds were obtained from the Natural Product Atlas [34], modified in the online applet of ChemDraw and exported images were edited in Inkscape. Antibiotic resistance genes were identified with ABRicate coupled to the CARD database [35] under default parameters on Galaxy [22]. Genomic loci of genes associated with polymyxin resistance were identified within the P. piscis 75 genome in Geneious [33]. To identify resistance-conferring mutations in pmrAB, orthologs from the P. aeruginosa T genome (GCA_AE004091) were used for protein-protein pairwise alignments in both Geneious and BLASTp [36].

Results and discussion

Morphologically-distinct bacteria predominate the haemocoel of cadavers, previously infected with Steinernema spp. Kalro, 97 and 75

We aimed to obtain Xenorhabdus strains, by indirectly isolating putative Steinernema-associated bacteria from the haemocoel of EPN-infected cadavers. Two morphologically-distinct bacteria were the dominant culturable bacteria in G. mellonella cadavers infected with Steinernema spp. Kalro, 97, and 75 (Table 1, Fig. S1, available in the online version of this article).

Table 1.

Morphological and biochemical characteristics of steinernematid-associated bacterium strains

Bacterium strain

Strain 75

Strain Kalro

Strain 97

Nematode host

Steinernema sp. 75

Steinernema sp. Kalro

Steinernema sp. 97

Pigmentation on Nutrient Agar

White

Rustic brown

Rustic brown

Elevation

Flat

Umbonate

Umbonate

Form

Regular

Irregular

Irregular

Margins

Entire

Entire

Entire

Texture

Mucoid

Mucoid

Mucoid

Swarming motility on 1.2 % agar plates

+

+

+

Catalase production

+

Ampicillin resistance (100 µg ml−1)

+

Ampicillin resistance

(50 µg ml−1)

+

(+) Positive, (−) Negative.

Specifically, four days after infection of larvae with Steinernema sp. Kalro, the dominant cultivable bacteria from the haemocoel of cadavers had the characteristics listed in Table 1. These same colonies were predominant in the haemocoel of Steinernema sp. 97-infected cadavers, seven days post-infection (Table 1). This difference in post-infection duration before the isolation of bacteria from the haemocoel was due to the different durations until IJ emergence. Differences in the number of EPNs that infected larvae cannot be excluded as a reason for the faster emergence Steinernema sp. Kalro IJs, as the number of EPNs in each inoculum was not determined. For Steinernema sp. 75-infected cadavers, the dominant cultivable bacteria in the haemocoel, seven days post-infection, had characteristics that differed from those of other treatments (Table 1, Fig. S1).

We hypothesised that all three of these bacterial strains are likely members of Proteobacteria . This is because Proteobacteria are typically the dominant cultivable coloniser of Steinernema-infected insect larvae, following insect death. For example, 48 h post-infection, the dominant cultivable bacteria in the haemocoel of G. mellonella cadavers that had been infected with S. riobrave 355, S. riobrave Oscar, S. feltiae, S. carpocapsae Kapow, and S. carpocapsae 25 were Xenorhabdus , Pseudomonas , Serratia and Salmonella , Xenorhabdus and Pseudomonas , and X. nematophila, respectively [6]. Similarly, at 72 h post-infection with S. feltiae CO1, P. protegens was the dominant bacteria in haemolymph from G. mellonella cadavers [11]. Relatedly, in S. carpocapsae-infected Manduca sexta cadavers, X. nematophila AN1 was the dominant bacteria in the haemolymph 48 h post-infection [37].

Among these Proteobacteria, the Xenorhabdus genus has characteristics similar to those of strains Kalro and 97 that are listed in Table 1 [38, 39]. However, pigmentation [39] and ampicillin resistance are species-specific traits. For example, X. budapestensis [40], X. bovienii [41], and X. nematophila are ampicillin-resistant, whereas X. griffiniae is not [42]. Our results support the hypothesis that, from four days post-infection, the predominant cultivable bacteria in the haemolymph of cadavers infected with either Steinernema sp. Kalro or Steinernema sp. 97 were ampicillin-sensitive strains of Xenorhabdus, while those in cadavers previously infected with Steinernema sp. 75 were of a different genus. Steinernema sp. Kalro and Steinernema sp. 75 are conspecific strains [17]. However, they had morphologically different bacteria that predominated haemocoels of larvae they had previously infected (Table 1, Fig. S1), at four and seven days post-infection, respectively. This difference in the predominant bacterial coloniser is unlikely due to duration post-infection, since temporal changes in the predominant cultures in Steinernema-infected cadavers were only observed up until 48 h [6]. It is likely due to differences in the geographical region of isolation of the nematodes. For example, A. faecalis , S. marcescens , and P. protogens were the prevalent bacteria in G.mellonella cadavers that had been infected with S. feltiae ALG18, S. feltiae CAST5, and S. feltiae C01, respectively. These three conspecific nematodes were isolated from geographically-distinct soils [10, 43]. Similarly, the haemocoel of dead Tenbrio molitor larvae previously infected with the exact same Steinernema species but then reared in geographically-distinct soils had significantly different bacterial communities, 10 days post-infection [44]. Taken together, we find support for the hypothesis that the haemocoel of G. mellonella larvae previously infected with either Steinernema sp. Kalro or Steinernema sp. 75, which are conspecific nematodes from geographically different soils, were dominated by different cultivable bacterial genera, from four days post-infection.

Strains of X. griffiniae and P. piscis are isolated from G. mellonella cadavers previously infected with Steinernema nematodes.

To conclusively identify prokaryotic species, we sequenced and assembled the genomes of the three bacterial isolates (Table 1). We then assessed the quality of genome assemblies to determine their suitability for subsequent bioinformatic analyses. All three genomes had values for N50, completion, and contamination that were >4.5 Mb, >99.5 %, and <1.7 %, respectively (Table 2), making them suitable for species delineation through dDDH analysis. Bacterial strains Kalro and 97 were both delineated as X. griffiniae while bacterial strain 75 was delineated as Pseudomonas piscis . This is because their pairwise dDDH values with corresponding type strains were all above the 70 % threshold value for conspecific strains [45, 46]. Specifically, the pairwise dDDH values between corresponding type strains and strains Kalro, 97 and 75 were 70.3, 70.6, and 83.0 %, respectively (Supplementary workbook 1).

Table 2.

Characteristics of genomes assembled in this study as determined on the BV-BRC platform [27]. Genomes were annotated with RAST-K [79]

X. griffiniae 97

X. griffiniae Kalro

P. piscis 75

Genome length

4 559 032 bp

4 559 030 bp

6 752 883 bp

Contig N50

4 559 032 bp

4 559 030 bp

6 752 883 bp

G+C content

43.84%

43.84%

63.61 %

Assembly coverage

48 ×

65 ×

125 ×

Completeness

100 %

100 %

99.5 %

Contamination

0.2 %

0.3 %

1.7 %

Coarse consistency

99.2 %

99.2 %

98.7 %

Fine consistency

98.4 %

98.2 %

95.9 %

Total gene features

5074

5077

6475

Total protein-encoding genes

4438

4441

6306

Partial protein-encoding genes

0

0

0

Protein-encoding genes with functional assignments

3179 (71.6 %)

3176 (71.5 %)

4876 (77.3 %)

Protein-encoding genes without functional assignments

1259

1265

1430

Repeat regions

476

476

58

tRNA

81

81

71

rRNA

22

22

16

Bp, base pairs; CDS, coding sequences; tRNA, transfer ribonucleic acid DNA sequences, rRNA, ribosomal ribonucleic acid DNA sequences; G+C content, guanine + cytosine content.

The bacterium isolates were hence renamed as follows: strain Kalro= X. griffiniae Kalro, strain 97= X. griffiniae 97, and strain 75= P. piscis 75. The difference in GC content between genomes of X. griffiniae Kalro and 97 was less than 1 % (Table 2), further validating them as conspecific strains [46]. Xenorhabdus are natural gut endosymbionts of Steinernema IJs [39] while strains from the P. chlororaphis clade, a sister clade to that of P. piscis 75 (Fig. 1), are frequently associated with Steinernema IJs [7, 16, 44]. Altogether, we found support for the hypothesis that X. griffiniae 97, X. griffiniae Kalro, and P. piscis 75 originated from the Steinernema IJs that infected the G. mellonella larvae.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Neighbour-joining phylogenomic reconstruction of strains most closely related to Pseudomonas piscis 75 and Pseudomonas sp. CMR5c, as reconstructed with FASTME, using Genome Distance blast Phylogeny (GDBP) distances calculated from distance formula d5 on the Type Strain Genome Server [28]. Strain 75 was isolated in this study and clustered in the P. piscis clade. Other members of P. piscis clade, strains CMAA1215 and CMR5c were previously demonstrated to both be conspecific with P. piscis [45, 80]. P. piscis strains fell within a clade containing both P. protegens and P. chlororaphis subgroups (red). This clade contains all insecticidal pseudomonads [13, 55]. Pseudo-bootstrap values from 100 replications are shown at nodes.

From the RAST-K annotation analyses (Table 2), the proportions of protein-encoding genes with functional assignments in strains Kalro, 97 and 75 were 71.6, 71.5, 77.3 %, respectively. This was consistent with the proportion of protein-encoding genes with functional assignments from NCBI COG annotation analyses (Fig. 2). For both annotation analyses, the proportion was higher in the Pseudomonas than Xenorhabdus genomes. A likely reason for this higher proportion is the bias towards elucidation of gene functions in pseudomonads than in other prokaryotic taxa [47]. Despite their smaller size, both X. griffiniae genomes had 476 repeat regions compared to 58 in P. piscis 75 (Table 2). The X. nematophila ATTC19061 genome also had a considerably high proportion of repeat regions [48], suggesting that this may be a genus-related genome characteristic.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Pie charts representing the proportions of the proteome that are assigned to various functions in three steinernematid-associated bacteria. (a) Pseudomonas piscis 75 (b) Xenorhabdus griffiniae Kalro (c) X. griffiniae 97. Functional categories are from the NCBI COG 2020 database. The proportion of proteins with known functional assignments (this excludes categories R and S) for strains 75, Kalro and 97 were 73, 70 and 69 %, respectively.

X. griffiniae endosymbionts of different Steinernema species from soils in Kenya belonged to one subspecies. This is because X. griffiniae strains Kalro, 97, VH1, and XN45 had pairwise dDDH values amongst them that all exceeded (Supplementary workbook 1) the 80 % threshold for subspecies [49]. We previously isolated X. griffiniae XN45 and X. griffiniae VH1 from Steinernema sp. scarpo and Steinernema sp. VH1, respectively, These nematodes were isolated from soils in Murang’a and Vihiga, Kenya, respectively [19, 50]. X. griffiniae Kalro and X. griffiniae 97, were isolated from Steinernema sp. Kalro and 75, whose natural habitats were soils in Thika and Rift Valley regions of Kenya, respectively [17]. Moreover, Steinernema sp. scarpo, Steinernema sp. Kalro and Steinernema sp. 97 are most likely three new species, as they each had at least 2.3 % ITS rDNA sequence dissimilarities [17, 51], with any described species. This sequence dissimilarity threshold often delineates closely-related Steinernema species [52, 53].

Although Steinernema sp. 75 and Steinernema sp. Kalro were conspecific, they differed in levels of entomopathogenicity – i.e the mean larval mortality rate in Tuta absoluta at 48 h post-infection with 150 EPN IJs – and geographic regions of isolation [17]. Our findings demonstrate that they also differed in the prevalent bacteria, P. pisics 75 and X. griffiniae Kalro respectively, found in the haemocoel of G. mellonella they had previously infected, four days post-infection. The soil habitat of Steinernema IJs were hypothesised as the likely source of its Pseudomonas microbiota [7]. These bacteria were then suggested to be vertically transmitted between nematodes [7]. Since the insecticidal repertoire of a pseudomonad is strain-specific [13, 54] we hypothesize that soils influenced the association of P. pisics 75 with Steinernema sp. 75, which in turn influenced nematode entomopathogenicity, resulting in conspecific nematodes from geographically-distinct soils, having different levels of entomopathogenicity.

The genome of P. piscis 75 does not encode the Fit toxin but encodes other insect toxins and antimicrobials

P. piscis 75 belonged to the P. protogens subgroup (Fig. 1) [55], whose members were previously demonstrated to be highly insecticidal partly due to the Fit entomotoxin [13, 54]. We therefore analysed the P. piscis 75 genome to identify fitD [14] and other genes that encode the production of entomotoxic secondary metabolites.

Using previously designed primer sequences for fitD [32] as probes, we searched the four P. piscis genomes for fitD, which was detected in all but the P. piscis 75 genome. In strain CMAA1215, fitD (locus tag: P308_15705) was 8646 bp, and encoded 2682 aa, whereas in both CMR5c and P. piscis T, fitD was 8991 bp and encoded 2997 aa (locus tags: C4K40_3850 and GDH07_25415, respectively). To verify the absence of fitD in strain 75, we used both fitD sequences to query the P. piscis 75 genome using blast [36]. Neither yielded the identification of an ortholog. Lastly, we identified and analysed all genes in the P. piscis 75 genome that encoded proteins between 1837–3714 aa (Supplementary workbook 1) because, in other P. piscis strains, fitD encodes a protein of either 2682 or 2997 aa. None of the identified genes were orthologous to fitD.

Genomes of 37/39 strains from the clade comprising both P. protogens and P. chlororaphis subgroups contained fitD [13]. The two strains that did not, P. chlororaphis T and P. chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca T, were associated with neither plants nor arthropods, unlike all strains that had fitD. These findings support the hypothesis that P. piscis 75 is a nematode-associated member of the P. protogens subgroup, whose genome does not contain fitD.

The P. piscis 75 genome had 18 BGCs, nine of which were predicted to encode the production of known molecules with a variety of biological activities (Table 3, Fig. 3).

Table 3.

Biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) in the Pseudomonas piscis 75 genome

BGC

Type

Biosynthesis it encodes

Putative bioactivity

Locus

Known BGCs

1.

prnA-D

Pyrrole

Pyrrolnitrin

Antifungal

4,127,239–4 132 801

2.

phzA-H,M,S

Phenazine

Pyocyanin

Cytotoxin

3,342,609–3 336 401

3.

rzxA-I

PKS

Rhizoxin A

Insect toxin, antifungal, antimitotic

3,346,472–3 424 870

4.

pltA-R

PKS-NRPS

Pyoluteorin

Antibacterial, antifungal

2,951,699–2 981 670

5.

phlA-D

PKS

2,4-diacetyl-phloroglucinol

Antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antiprotozoal, antihelminth, antimitotic

6,441,826–6 450 040

6.

ofaA-C

NRPS

Orfamide B

Insect toxin, antibacterial

2,351,633–2 386 072

7.

hcnABC

Hydrogen cyanide

biocide, insect toxin

2,859,952–2 862 912

8.

pqqA-F

Redox cofactor

Pyrroloquinoline quinone

Antioxidant

6,144,469–6 151 272

9.

pvdIJDL

NRPS

Ferric-pyoverdine

Siderophore

4,603,253–4,572,268 and 4,684,060–4,697,091

Unknown BGCs*

10.

NRPS-PKS

DAsp containing NRP-PK hybrid

4,492,684–4 496 951

11.

ß-lactone

4,422,992–4 432 121

12.

Homo-serine lactone

5,480,867–5 491 545

13.

Aryl polyene

535,484–521 163

14.

Aryl polyene

5,068,530–5 082 729

15.

Terpene

5,266,698–5 284 670

16.

NAGGN

4,866,653–4 875 283

17.

RIPP-like

2,644,416–2 640 621

18.

CDPS

1,536,225–1 540 602

*Unknown BGCs are defined as those that encode the biosynthesis of lead molecules whose chemical structures remain to be elucidated.

CDPS, cyclic dipeptide synthase; NAGGN, N-acetylglutaminylglutamine amide; NRPS, non-ribosomal peptide synthetase; PKS, polyketide synthase; RIPP, ribosomally synthesised and post-translationally modified peptide.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Known natural products whose production is predicted to be encoded by biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) found in the Pseudomonas piscis 75 genome.1, pyoluteorin; 2, 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol; 3, pyrroloquinoline quinone; 4, novel orfamide B derivative; 5, rhizoxin; 6, pyocyanin; 7, pyrrolnitrin; 8, ferric-pyoverdine. The orfABC BGC was predicted to encode the synthesis of 4, which differs from orfamide B at the three building blocks highlighted in red.

The nine unknown BGCs were predicted to encode the production of uncharacterized molecules including a β-lactone, a homoserine lactone, a RIPP, a terpene, two arylpolyenes, and a DAsp-containing non-ribosomal peptide-polyketide hybrid (NRP-PKS) (Table 3).

Among the known BGCs, prnABCD [56], phzABCDEFGH [57], pltABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQR [58], and phlABCD [59] were predicted to encode the biosynthesis of the antifungal pyrrolnitrin, cytotoxin pyocyanin, antifungal and antibacterial pyoluteorin, and antimicrobial and antihelminth 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol, respectively, while the pqqABCDEF BGC [60] was predicted to encode the production of the antioxidant pyrroloquinoline quinone. Three known BGCs were predicted to encode the production of compounds with insecticidal activity: hcnABC [61], ofaABC [62, 63], and rzxABCDEFGHI [64, 65] encoded the production of hydrogen cyanide, rhizoxins, and orfamides, respectively (Fig. 3). The pvd BGC was predicted to encode the production of ferric-pyoverdines [66]. Pyoverdines are siderophores that are yellow and therefore are the possible cause for the tint of yellow observed in colonies of P. piscis 75 (Fig. S1). The P. piscis 75 pvd BGC encoded the production of an acylated octapeptide metallophore with the following linearised peptide backbone: Asp-DFo-OH-Orn-Lys-Thr-Ala-DAla-DFo-OH-Orn-Lys, which is identical to those of ferric-pyoverdines from P. protogens CHA01 and P. protogens Pf-5 [66]. This agrees with the finding that all members of the P. protogens subgroup (SG) encode the production of pyoverdines [55]. It further suggests that members of the P. protogens SG biosynthesize pyoverdines that have an identical peptide backbone.

Orfamides are lipopeptides produced by the OfaA, OfaB, and OfaC non-ribosomal peptide synthetases. In P. piscis 75, the predicted OfaA protein contained a Cstarter domain, which catalyses N-terminal acylation [67] that results in lipopeptides. The encoded OfaA, OfaB, and OfaC non-ribosomal synthetases were predicted to contain ten modules. We analysed these predicted ten modules, and using the Stachelhaus codes of the adenylation domains [68] and positions of dual epimerisation/condensation domains [67], predicted that they biosynthesize a peptide backbone of DLeu-DGlu-DaThr-DVal-DLeu-DSer-LLeu-LLeu-DSer-DVal. This was most similar to the Orfamide B backbone but differed in the configurations of amino acids at position one (LLeu), five (LLeu), and ten (LVal) [63], suggesting that P. pisics 75 encodes the production of novel Orfamide B derivatives (Fig. 3). Orfamide B is not only both an antibacterial and insecticidal compound but is also the main cyclic lipopeptide biosynthesized by the CMR5c strain of P. piscis [63]. Orfamides were demonstrated to contribute to the oral entomopathogenicity of pseudomonads to Plutella xylostella [15].

The hcnABC BGC in the P. pisics 75 was predicted to encode the biosynthesis hydrogen cyanide, a biocidal compound produced by pseudomonads in both P. chlororaphis and P. protegens subgroups [13, 55]. In P. protogens T, hydrogen cyanide was shown to significantly contribute to its entomopathogenicity via intrahaemocoel and oral routes to G. mellonella and P. xylostella, respectively [15]. The rhiABCDEFGHI BGC in the P. piscis 75 genome was predicted to encode the production of rhizoxins. These are broadly toxic macrolides that contributed to the entomopathogenicity of P. protegens Pf-5 to Drosophila melanogaster [64]. Taken together, these demonstrate that P. piscis 75 encodes the production of the insect toxins rhizoxins and orfamides, and the antimicrobials pyrrolnitrin, pyocyanin, pyoluteorin, and 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol.

P. piscis 75 encodes a robust resistome

Although one Xenorhabdus species may be the natural endosymbiont of several Steinernema species, the reverse is not true: one Steinernema species naturally hosts one Xenorhabdus species only [69]. Hence, Steinernema sp. 75, with which P. piscis 75 was associated, most probably hosts X. griffiniae since this was the Xenorhabdus endosymbiont of the conspecific Steinernema sp. Kalro. We hypothesised that for P. piscis 75 to be the predominant cultivable bacterium in the haemocoel of Steinernema sp. 75-infected G. mellonella cadavers, it encodes a diverse resistome. This resistome would confer resistance against any X. griffiniae antimicrobial that is secreted into the G. mellonella haemocoel during nematode infection. To test this hypothesis, we first identified genes in the P. piscis 75 genome, which were predicted to encode resistance. In total, they were 39 and were predicted to encode resistance to the following antimicrobials: triclosan, phenicols, cationic antimicrobial peptides, fosfomycin, flouroquinolones, macrolides, aminoglycosides, benzalkonium chloride, aminocoumarin, diaminopyrimidines, nitrofurans, acridine dyes, cephamycin, sulfonamide, tetracyclines including glycylcycline, and betalactams including carbapenem, cephalosporin, monobactams and penams (Supplementary workbook 1).

On the other hand, in the X. griffiniae Kalro genome, the putative Xenorhabdus endosymbiont of Steinernema sp. 75, we identified paxABC [70] as the only known BGC that encodes the production of an antibacterial, i.e. the PAX lipopeptides [71]. The cationic nature of PAX lipopeptides is due to the six lysine monomers in its heptapeptide backbone (Fig. 4). Notably, the predicted X. griffiniae PAX lipopeptide differed from those of X. nematophila F1 [71], X.nematophila HGB081 [70], X. doucetiae T [72], and X. khoisanae SB10 [73] by having LSer at position one instead of Gly (Fig. 4), since its corresponding Stachelhaus code was DVWHLSLIDK and not DILQIGLIWK. In terms of mechanism of action, the cationic PAX lipopeptides were shown to bind to negatively charged bacterial membranes and hence suggested to cause membrane rupture and eventual death of competing bacteria within the haemocoel of Steinernema-infected insect cadavers [72].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Prediction of genes encoding production of an antibacterial by Xenorhabdus griffiniae and genes encoding resistance to this antibacterial by Pseudomonas piscis 75. (a) The paxABC biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) is predicted to encode the biosynthesis PAX lipopeptides, which are novel derivatives due to the building block in red. (c) The arnBCADTEF-ugd operon of P. piscis 75 is predicted to encode resistance to PAX peptides.

Since P. piscis 75 was isolated from the haemocoel of Steinernema sp. 75-infected cadavers, we identified genes that likely encoded resistance against PAX lipopeptides. P. piscis 75 contained the arnBCADTEF-ugd operon (Fig. 4), which upon mutation or alteration in its regulation, results in resistance to the cationic non-ribosomal antimicrobial lipopeptide polymyxin. This is due to 4-amino-4-deoxy-l-arabinose (l-Ara4N)-mediated modification of Lipid A, which creates positively charged lipopolysaccharides, which make the outer membrane repulsive to cationic lipopeptides [74]. The arnBCADTEF-ugd operon is regulated by products of pmrAB genes, and specific mutations in these genes cause over-expression of the operon that then results in polymyxin resistance [74]. Our comparison of amino acid sequences encoded by pmrB genes of strain 75 (locus tag: QL104_06755) and P. aeruginosa T (locus tag: PA4777) did not identify any of the specific mutations associated with polymyxin resistance [75]. Nonetheless, the presence of the arnBCADTEF-ugd operon in the P. piscis 75 genome demonstrates its potential to encode resistance to PAX peptides. Although PAX lipopeptides are likely not the only antibacterial compounds X. griffiniae produces – Xenorhabdus bacteria often produce a diverse array of antimicrobials [76] – the robust resistome encoded by P. piscis 75 is a potential key contributor to its prevalence in the haemocoel of the Steinernema sp. 75-infected G. mellonella cadavers several days after infection. Our findings may explain why P. chlororaphis PCLRT03 was shown to dominate S. feltiae-infected cadavers at the expense of the nematodes’ Xenorhabdus endosymbionts, seven days post-infection [77].

Conclusion

We isolated strains of Steinernema-associated X. griffiniae and P. piscis from the haemocoel of Steinernema-infected cadavers. Both X. griffiniae strains Kalro and 97 belonged to the same subspecies as previously characterised X. griffiniae strains XN45 and VH1. P. piscis 75 phylogenetically clustered with highly insecticidal pseudomonads. The P. piscis 75 genome encoded the production of the insect toxins rhizoxin and orfamides, and the antimicrobials pyrrolnitrin, pyocyanin, pyoluteorin, and 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol. Moreover, the P. piscis 75 genome had 39 genes that were predicted to confer resistance to over ten classes of antibiotics. P. piscis 75 hence has the potential to produce insect toxins and dominate EPN-infected cadavers through resisting antimicrobials produced by competing bacterial colonisers.

This study generated novel insights into the microbiology of EPNs: Steinermema-associated P. piscis bacteria can produce insect toxins, which are likely to contribute to host nematode entomopathogenicity. Such insights are applicable in the selection of strains for dual biological control agents (BCA) that combine entomopathogenic pseudomonads (EPP) with EPNs [78]. P. piscis 75 is a good candidate for EPP +EPN BCAs, as it is unlikely to be incompatible with Steinernema EPNs.

The complete genome sequences from this study provide the missing data for deep dives into both X. griffiniae and P. piscis pangenomes. Pangenome studies on these two species have been hampered by their few number of publicly available genomes [19, 55]. Lastly, this study has revealed P. piscis 75 BGCs. Some of these are predicted to encode the biosynthesis of molecules whose structures remain unknown. Refactoring these BGCs can aid the structure elucidation of the molecules, whose biosynthesis the BGCs encode. In this regard, refactoring the P. piscis 75 ofaA-C BGC would accelerate the confirmation of the chemical structures we predicted for the novel orfamide B derivatives. Similarly, refactoring unknown P. piscis 75 BGCs can lead to the isolation of considerable quantities of the target compounds. This in turn aids both their structure and bioactivity elucidation. In an age plagued with exacerbating pesticide and antimicrobial resistance, determining the structures and functions of novel natural products is of increasing importance.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1
Supplementary material 2

Funding information

This study was supported by the Kenya National Research Fund grant NRF 1st CALL/MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH/127 'Drug Development of Antibiotics: Xenorhabdus bacteria from Kenya' to NOA.

Author contributions

R.M.A.-conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, investigation, validation, funding acquisition, project administration, visualisation, writing-first draft, and writing-editing and reviewing. P.H.-resources, project administration, writing-editing and reviewing. N.O.A.-conceptualisation, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, and writing-editing and reviewing.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest. RMA is a proprietor of Elakistos Biosciences.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: aa, amino acid; BGC, biosynthetic gene cluster; bp, base pairs; BV-BRC, Bacterial, and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Centre; CDS, coding sequences; COG, cluster of orthologous groups; contig N50, the shortest contig among the fewest number of contigs that constitute 50% of the genome; dDDH, digital DNA-DNA hybridisation; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; EPN, entomopathogenic nematode; Fit, Pseudomonas fluorescens insecticidal toxin; IJ, infective juveniles; LB, lysogenybroth; Mb, megabases; MSA, multiple sequence alignment; NCBI, National Centre for Bioinformatics Information; NRP, non-ribosomal peptide; NRPS, non-ribosomal peptide synthetase; ONP, oxford nanopore; PKS, polyketide synthase; RIPP, ribosomally synthesised and post-translationally modified peptide; TYGS, type strain genome server.

One supplementary figure and one supplementary workbook are available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.van den Hoogen J, Geisen S, Routh D, Ferris H, Traunspurger W, et al. Soil nematode abundance and functional group composition at a global scale. Nature. 2019;572:194–198. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1418-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adams BJ, Fodor A, Koppenhöfer HS, Stackebrandt E, Patricia Stock S, et al. Biodiversity and systematics of nematode–bacterium entomopathogens. Biological Control. 2006;37:32–49. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.11.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dillman AR, Chaston JM, Adams BJ, Ciche TA, Goodrich-Blair H, et al. An entomopathogenic nematode by any other name. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002527. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bhat AH, Chaubey AK, Askary TH. Global distribution of entomopathogenic nematodes, Steinernema and Heterorhabditis. Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2020;30:31. doi: 10.1186/s41938-020-0212-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dziedziech A, Shivankar S, Theopold U. High-resolution infection kinetics of entomopathogenic nematodes entering Drosophila melanogaster . Insects. 2020;11:60. doi: 10.3390/insects11010060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gouge DH, Snyder JL. Temporal association of entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) and bacteria. J Invertebr Pathol. 2006;91:147–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2005.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ogier J-C, Pagès S, Frayssinet M, Gaudriault S. Entomopathogenic nematode-associated microbiota: from monoxenic paradigm to pathobiome. Microbiome. 2020;8:25. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00800-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Quiroz-Castañeda RE, Mendoza-Mejía A, Obregón-Barboza V, Martínez-Ocampo F, Hernández-Mendoza A, et al. Identification of a new Alcaligenes faecalis strain MOR02 and assessment of its toxicity and pathogenicity to insects. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:570243. doi: 10.1155/2015/570243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Razia M, Karthikraja R, Padmanaban K, Chellapandi P, Sivaramakrishnan S. 16S rDNA-based phylogeny of non-symbiotic bacteria of Entorno-pathogenic nematodes from infected insect cadavers. Genom Proteom Bioinform. 2011;9:104–112. doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(11)60013-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ruiu L, Virdis B, Mura ME, Floris I, Satta A, et al. Oral insecticidal activity of new bacterial isolates against insects in two orders. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2017;27:886–902. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2017.1355964. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ruiu L, Marche MG, Mura ME, Tarasco E. Involvement of a novel Pseudomonas protegens strain associated with entomopathogenic nematode infective juveniles in insect pathogenesis. Pest Manag Sci. 2022;78:5437–5443. doi: 10.1002/ps.7166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Crawford JM, Kontnik R, Clardy J. Regulating alternative lifestyles in entomopathogenic bacteria. Curr Biol. 2010;20:69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Flury P, Aellen N, Ruffner B, Péchy-Tarr M, Fataar S, et al. Insect pathogenicity in plant-beneficial pseudomonads: phylogenetic distribution and comparative genomics. ISME J. 2016;10:2527–2542. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Péchy-Tarr M, Bruck DJ, Maurhofer M, Fischer E, Vogne C, et al. Molecular analysis of a novel gene cluster encoding an insect toxin in plant-associated strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens . Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:2368–2386. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01662.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Flury P, Vesga P, Péchy-Tarr M, Aellen N, Dennert F, et al. Antimicrobial and insecticidal: cyclic lipopeptides and hydrogen cyanide produced by plant-beneficial Pseudomonas strains CHA0, CMR12a, and PCL1391 contribute to insect killing. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:100. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ogier J-C, Akhurst R, Boemare N, Gaudriault S. The endosymbiont and the second bacterial circle of entomopathogenic nematodes. Trends Microbiol. 2023;31:629–643. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2023.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ngugi CN, Wachira PM, Mbaka JN, Okoth S, Haukeland S, et al. Biocontrol potential of four indigenous entomopathogenic nematodes from Kenya. J Agric Sci. 2021;13:107. doi: 10.5539/jas.v13n10p107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ngugi CN, Wachira PM, Mbaka JN, Okoth S, Haukeland S, et al. Characterization and pathogenicity test of entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema species-Kalro. J Agric Sci. 2021;13:93. doi: 10.5539/jas.v13n3p93. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Awori RM, Waturu CN, Pidot SJ, Amugune NO, Bode HB. Draft genomes, phylogenomic reconstruction and comparative genome analysis of three Xenorhabdus strains isolated from soil-dwelling nematodes in Kenya. Access Microbiol. 2023;5:acmi000531.v4. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000531.v4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bertani G. Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol. 1951;62:293–300. doi: 10.1128/jb.62.3.293-300.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wick RR, Judd LM, Cerdeira LT, Hawkey J, Méric G, et al. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol. 2021;22:266. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02483-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jalili V, Afgan E, Gu Q, Clements D, Blankenberg D, et al. The galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2020 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:8205–8207. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vaser R, Šikić M. Time- and memory-efficient genome assembly with Raven. Nat Comput Sci. 2021;1:332–336. doi: 10.1038/s43588-021-00073-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Oxford Nanopore Technologies 2022. https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka
  • 27.Olson RD, Assaf R, Brettin T, Conrad N, Cucinell C, et al. Introducing the bacterial and viral bioinformatics resource center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D678–D689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W256–W259. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bah T. Inkscape: Guide to a Vector Drawing Program. Prentice Hall Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F, et al. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:W46–W50. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ruffner B, Péchy-Tarr M, Höfte M, Bloemberg G, Grunder J, et al. Evolutionary patchwork of an insecticidal toxin shared between plant-associated pseudomonads and the insect pathogens Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus . BMC Genomics. 2015;16:609. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1763-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, et al. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.van Santen JA, Poynton EF, Iskakova D, McMann E, Alsup TA, et al. The Natural Products Atlas 2.0: a database of microbially-derived natural products. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D1317–D1323. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Alcock BP, Huynh W, Chalil R, Smith KW, Raphenya AR, et al. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D690–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Singh S, Reese JM, Casanova-Torres AM, Goodrich-Blair H, Forst S. Microbial population dynamics in the hemolymph of Manduca sexta infected with Xenorhabdus nematophila and the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae . Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:4277–4285. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00768-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Givaudan A, Baghdiguian S, Lanois A, Boemare N. Swarming and swimming changes concomitant with phase variation in Xenorhabdus nematophilus . Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:1408–1413. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.4.1408-1413.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tailliez P, Pagès S, Ginibre N, Boemare N. New insight into diversity in the genus Xenorhabdus, including the description of ten novel species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:2805–2818. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64287-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Abebew D, Sayedain FS, Bode E, Bode HB. Uncovering nematicidal natural products from Xenorhabdus Bacteria. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70:498–506. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c05454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sajnaga E, Kazimierczak W, Skowronek M, Lis M, Skrzypek T, et al. Steinernema poinari (Nematoda: Steinernematidae): a new symbiotic host of entomopathogenic bacteria Xenorhabdus bovienii . Arch Microbiol. 2018;200:1307–1316. doi: 10.1007/s00203-018-1544-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alani OS, Cao M, Goodrich-Blair H, Heppert JK. Conjugation and transposon mutagenesis of Xenorhabdus griffiniae HGB2511, the bacterial symbiont of the nematode Steinernema hermaphroditum (India) MicroPubl Biol. 2023;2023 doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tarasco E, Clausi M, Rappazzo G, Panzavolta T, Curto G, et al. Biodiversity of entomopathogenic nematodes in Italy. J Helminthol. 2015;89:359–366. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X14000194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cambon MC, Lafont P, Frayssinet M, Lanois A, Ogier J-C, et al. Bacterial community profile after the lethal infection of Steinernema-Xenorhabdus pairs into soil-reared Tenebrio molitor larvae. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020;96:fiaa009. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Girard L, Lood C, Höfte M, Vandamme P, Rokni-Zadeh H, et al. The ever-expanding Pseudomonas genus: description of 43 new species and partition of the Pseudomonas putida group. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1766. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Taxonomic use of DNA G+C content and DNA-DNA hybridization in the genomic age. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:352–356. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.056994-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lobb B, Tremblay B-M, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Doxey AC. An assessment of genome annotation coverage across the bacterial tree of life. Microb Genom. 2020;6:e000341. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Latreille P, Norton S, Goldman BS, Henkhaus J, Miller N, et al. Optical mapping as a routine tool for bacterial genome sequence finishing. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:321. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen J, Scheuner C, Michael V, et al. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083(T), the type strain (U5/41(T)) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand Genomic Sci. 2014;9:2. doi: 10.1186/1944-3277-9-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Awori RM, Ng’ang’a PN, Nyongesa LN, Amugune NO, Masiga D. Mursamacin: a novel class of antibiotics from soil-dwelling roundworms of Central Kenya that inhibits methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] F1000Res. 2017;5:2431. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9652.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Awori RM. Nematophilic bacteria as a source of novel macrocyclised antimicrobial non-ribosomal peptides. DSc, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main: Frankfurt am Main. 2020. http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/61042
  • 52.Lis M. S n. sp. (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), a new entomopathogenic nematode from Poland. J Nematol. 2021;53:1–24. doi: 10.21307/jofnem-2021-051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Spiridonov SE, Reid AP, Podrucka K, Subbotin SA, Moens M. Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Steinernema (Nematoda: Rhabditida) as inferred from analyses of sequences of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of rDNA and morphological features. Nematol. 2004;6:547–566. doi: 10.1163/1568541042665304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vesga P, Augustiny E, Keel C, Maurhofer M, Vacheron J. Phylogenetically closely related pseudomonads isolated from arthropods exhibit differential insect-killing abilities and genetic variations in insecticidal factors. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23:5378–5394. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Garrido-Sanz D, Vesga P, Heiman CM, Altenried A, Keel C, et al. Relation of pest insect-killing and soilborne pathogen-inhibition abilities to species diversification in environmental Pseudomonas protegens . ISME J. 2023;17:1369–1381. doi: 10.1038/s41396-023-01451-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hammer PE, Hill DS, Lam ST, Van Pée KH, Ligon JM. Four genes from Pseudomonas fluorescens that encode the biosynthesis of pyrrolnitrin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:2147–2154. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.6.2147-2154.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mavrodi DV, Bonsall RF, Delaney SM, Soule MJ, Phillips G, et al. Functional analysis of genes for biosynthesis of pyocyanin and phenazine-1-carboxamide from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:6454–6465. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6454-6465.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nowak-Thompson B, Chaney N, Wing JS, Gould SJ, Loper JE. Characterization of the pyoluteorin biosynthetic gene cluster of Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:2166–2174. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.7.2166-2174.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bangera MG, Thomashow LS. Identification and characterization of a gene cluster for synthesis of the polyketide antibiotic 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol from Pseudomonas fluorescens Q2-87. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:3155–3163. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.10.3155-3163.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Velterop JS, Sellink E, Meulenberg JJ, David S, Bulder I, et al. Synthesis of pyrroloquinoline quinone in vivo and in vitro and detection of an intermediate in the biosynthetic pathway. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:5088–5098. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.17.5088-5098.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Laville J, Blumer C, Von Schroetter C, Gaia V, Défago G, et al. Characterization of the hcnABC gene cluster encoding hydrogen cyanide synthase and anaerobic regulation by ANR in the strictly aerobic biocontrol agent Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:3187–3196. doi: 10.1128/JB.180.12.3187-3196.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gross H, Stockwell VO, Henkels MD, Nowak-Thompson B, Loper JE, et al. The genomisotopic approach: a systematic method to isolate products of orphan biosynthetic gene clusters. Chem Biol. 2007;14:53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ma Z, Geudens N, Kieu NP, Sinnaeve D, Ongena M, et al. Biosynthesis, chemical structure, and structure-activity relationship of orfamide lipopeptides produced by Pseudomonas protegens and related species. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:382. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Loper JE, Henkels MD, Rangel LI, Olcott MH, Walker FL, et al. Rhizoxin analogs, orfamide A and chitinase production contribute to the toxicity of Pseudomonas protegens strain Pf-5 to Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:3509–3521. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Loper JE, Henkels MD, Shaffer BT, Valeriote FA, Gross H. Isolation and identification of rhizoxin analogs from Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5 by using a genomic mining strategy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:3085–3093. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02848-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hartney SL, Mazurier S, Girard MK, Mehnaz S, Davis EW, et al. Ferric-pyoverdine recognition by Fpv outer membrane proteins of Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:765–776. doi: 10.1128/JB.01639-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rausch C, Hoof I, Weber T, Wohlleben W, Huson DH. Phylogenetic analysis of condensation domains in NRPS sheds light on their functional evolution. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Stachelhaus T, Mootz HD, Marahiel MA. The specificity-conferring code of adenylation domains in nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Chem Biol. 1999;6:493–505. doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(99)80082-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Awori RM. Nematophilic bacteria associated with entomopathogenic nematodes and drug development of their biomolecules. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:993688. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.993688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fuchs SW, Proschak A, Jaskolla TW, Karas M, Bode HB. Structure elucidation and biosynthesis of lysine-rich cyclic peptides in Xenorhabdus nematophila. Org Biomol Chem. 2011;9:3130–3132. doi: 10.1039/c1ob05097d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gualtieri M, Aumelas A, Thaler J-O. Identification of a new antimicrobial lysine-rich cyclolipopeptide family from Xenorhabdus nematophila . J Antibiot. 2009;62:295–302. doi: 10.1038/ja.2009.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Vo TD, Spahn C, Heilemann M, Bode HB. Microbial cationic peptides as a natural defense mechanism against insect antimicrobial peptides. ACS Chem Biol. 2021;16:447–451. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.0c00794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dreyer J, Rautenbach M, Booysen E, van Staden AD, Deane SM, et al. Xenorhabdus khoisanae SB10 produces Lys-rich PAX lipopeptides and a Xenocoumacin in its antimicrobial complex BMC Microbiol 201919132 10.1186/s12866-019-1503-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Olaitan AO, Morand S, Rolain J-M. Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:643. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Moskowitz SM, Brannon MK, Dasgupta N, Pier M, Sgambati N, et al. PmrB mutations promote polymyxin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from colistin-treated cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:1019–1030. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05829-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Tobias NJ, Wolff H, Djahanschiri B, Grundmann F, Kronenwerth M, et al. Natural product diversity associated with the nematode symbionts Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus . Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:1676–1685. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0039-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Spescha A, Zwyssig M, Hess Hermida M, Moix A, Bruno P, et al. When competitors join forces: consortia of entomopathogenic microorganisms increase killing speed and mortality in leaf- and root-feeding insect hosts. Microb Ecol. 2023;86:1947–1960. doi: 10.1007/s00248-023-02191-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Spescha A, Weibel J, Wyser L, Brunner M, Hess Hermida M, et al. Combining entomopathogenic Pseudomonas bacteria, nematodes and fungi for biological control of a below-ground insect pest. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2023;348:108414. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2023.108414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8365. doi: 10.1038/srep08365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Liu Y, Rao Q, Blom J, Lin Q, Luo T. Pseudomonas piscis sp. nov., isolated from the profound head ulcers of farmed Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:2732–2739. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1
Supplementary material 2

Articles from Access Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES