Following the publication and correction of this article [1, 2], concerns were raised regarding reuse of results presented in presented in Figs 9 and 10. Specifically,
- Fig 10, the following panels appear to fully or partially overlap, despite being used to represent different experimental conditions:
Some of the similar (or reused) images were used to represent controls in these articles, but different methodological details were reported for the indicated experiments in the articles’ Materials and Methods sections. Given the nature and extent of the issues, the PLOS ONE Editors are concerned about the reliability of data management and/or reporting for this study [1].
A co-author on the article responded that they were unable to retrieve the original data underlying this study, and requested the retraction of the article.
In light of the above concerns, the PLOS ONE Editors retract this article.
Some figure panels discussed above appear to report previously published material that are offered under a CC BY license, but the original articles were not attributed in [1]. For these images, the * by the citation, above, marks the oldest publication of the image of which PLOS is aware.
The Fig 10 panel G1 results report material from [5], published in 2015 by Ibrahim et al, under a CC-BY-NC 3.0 license. Due to restrictions that apply to the original article’s license, this figure is excluded from the PLOS article’s [1] CC BY 4.0 license. At the time of retraction, the article [1] was republished to note this exclusion in the Fig 10 legend and the article’s copyright statement.
SMN and MAA agreed with the retraction. MH responded but expressed neither agreement nor disagreement with the editorial decision. NSAW, MFH, SMD, DAB, SMS, ER, HK, RA, AHSA, and HMA either did not respond directly or could not be reached. SMN apologizes for the issues with the published article. MAA stands by the article’s findings.
References
- 1.Saeed AL-Wajeeh N, Halabi MF, Hajrezaie M, M. Dhiyaaldeen S, Abdulaziz Bardi D, M. Salama S, et al. (2016) The Gastroprotective Effect of Vitex pubescens Leaf Extract against Ethanol-Provoked Gastric Mucosal Damage in Sprague-Dawley Rats. PLoS ONE 11(9): e0157431. 10.1371/journal.pone.0157431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 2.AL-Wajeeh NS, Halabi MF, Hajrezaie M, Dhiyaaldeen SM, Abdulaziz Bardi D, Salama SM, et al. (2017) Correction: The Gastroprotective Effect of Vitex pubescens Leaf Extract against Ethanol-Provoked Gastric Mucosal Damage in Sprague-Dawley Rats. PLoS ONE 12(5): e0179072. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Halabi MF, Shakir RM, Bardi DA, Al-Wajeeh NS, Ablat A, Hassandarvish P, et al. (2014) Gastroprotective Activity of Ethyl-4-[(3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxybenzylidene) Amino]benzoate against Ethanol-Induced Gastric Mucosal Ulcer in Rats. PLoS ONE 9(5): e95908. 10.1371/journal.pone.0095908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 4.The PLOS ONE Editors (2023) Retraction: Gastroprotective Activity of Ethyl-4-[(3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxybenzylidene) Amino]benzoate against Ethanol-Induced Gastric Mucosal Ulcer in Rats. PLoS ONE 18(11): e0294007. 10.1371/journal.pone.0294007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ibrahim IAA, Abdulla M, Hajrezaei M, Bader A, Shahzad N, Al-Ghamdi SS, et al. (2016) The gastroprotective effects of hydroalcoholic extract of Monolluma quadrangula against ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injuries in Sprague Dawley rats. Drug Design, Development and Therapy 10: 93–105. 10.2147/DDDT.S91247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 6.Saremi K, Rad SK, Tayeby F, Abdulla MA, Karimian H, Majid NA (2019) Gastroprotective activity of a novel Schiff base derived dibromo substituted compound against ethanol-induced acute gastric lesions in rats. BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, 20: 13. 10.1186/s40360-019-0292-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]