Abstract
Introduction: The clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can vary widely, and while the primary infection involves the respiratory system, other organs can also be affected. This study presents the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in a tertiary hospital in Ado Ekiti, South-West Nigeria.
Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study involving COVID-19 patients admitted to the isolation ward between August 2020 and January 2021. The data used for this study was obtained from the patient’s medical record, which includes demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, baseline co-morbidities, and laboratory investigations.
Results: The average age of the patients was 60.3 years, and more than two-thirds were male. The most common symptoms were fever, shortness of breath, cough, and tiredness. Comorbidities identified among the patients included diabetes mellitus, heart disease, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. The most common radiological findings were bilateral homogeneous patchy opacities and peripheral fluffy infiltrates. The overall mortality rate was 21.9%, with 13 deaths in patients with severe disease. Age and duration of admission were found to be significant predictors of death.
Conclusion: The results of this study provide valuable insights into the clinical presentation of COVID-19 in Nigeria and may guide future management strategies for similar infections.
Keywords: clinical features, nigeria, mortality rate, epidemiology and public health, covid-19
Introduction
In December 2019, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was declared as a result of the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which originated in Wuhan, China, and rapidly spread worldwide by March 2020 [1,2]. This was later designated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in February 2020 by the World Health Organisation (WHO). As of September 2023, Nigeria has had a total of 266,675 confirmed cases of COVID-19 with mortality above three thousand [3].
The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 varies widely, while the primary infection targets the respiratory system, other organ systems such as the renal, haematological, neurological, gastrointestinal and endocrine systems are affected. The affectation can be asymptomatic, mild to moderate or life-threatening complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or death.
Symptomatic patients with COVID-19 may present with fever in about 85% of cases during their illness course [4]. Cough with or without sputum production including dyspnea, sore throat, and nasal congestion may be present. Constitutional symptoms such as muscle or bone aches, chills and headache are common while some patients have been reported to present with loss of taste and smell. Shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acute cardiac injury, acute kidney injury (AKI), and deaths were reported in severe cases [4,5]. COVID-19 disease has shown distinct symptomatology as well as outcomes across geographical borders owing to multiple factors such as population distribution, genetic make-up, baseline diseases, immune constitution, health infrastructure and probably some factors that are yet to be completely understood [6]. The synthesis and review of presenting symptoms and clinical features of COVID-19 infections may lead to a better understanding of the disease process in the Nigerian context. This information may be valuable in the management of similar infections in the future. We present hospitalized COVID-19 patients in our isolation centre, a tertiary hospital in Ado Ekiti, South West Nigeria.
Materials and methods
This is a retrospective and descriptive study of the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in our isolation ward between August 2020 and January 2021. The treatment centre provided medical care and closely monitored the patients. Ethical Review Committee at Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital (EKSUTH), Ado Ekiti, Nigeria issued approval for the study with an approval number EKSUTH/A67/2020/01/016.
Study location
The isolation centre is located at Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital (EKSUTH) in Ado Ekiti. Ado Ekiti, a state capital city in Nigeria, is situated in the South-Western region. The city has an urban character and is home to a diverse population. As of the latest available data, the estimated population of Ado Ekiti stands at approximately 366,280. This marks a notable increase from the 2006 population figure of 308,621, indicating the city's ongoing growth and development.
Data collection and handling
The data used for this study was obtained from the patient’s medical records which include the demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, baseline co‐morbidities and laboratory investigations. The data were double-checked by two medical officers after entering into the datasheet. Our inclusion criteria were adult patients with COVID-19 confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing who were admitted at the EKSUTH isolation centre during the study period. The exclusion criteria were patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and who were still on admission at the end of January 2021 and patients with incomplete medical records. Permission to conduct the research was obtained from the ethical review committee of the hospital.
Definition of terms
Fever was defined as a recorded temperature of 37.5°C or higher while hypoxia was defined as an oxygen saturation <94% on ambient air, or a requirement of supplemental O2 [7]. Body mass index in kg/m2 was calculated as a person’s weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters and categorized as underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2) and (≥ 30.0 kg/m2) obese.
The primary presenting symptom encompassed a singular symptom or a cluster of symptoms that the patient had during the initial assessment, including manifestations such as fever, myalgia, cough, and dyspnoea. This symptomatology was subsequently classified into distinct categories of asymptomatic and symptomatic presentations depending on whether they were present or not.
COVID-19 was classified as a mild, moderate and severe disease [7,8]. Mild disease includes symptomatic patients without evidence of viral pneumonia or hypoxia. Moderate diseases are patients with clinical and radiological signs of pneumonia but without signs of severe lung involvement. Severe disease was defined as a confirmed patient with the above symptoms in addition to extensive lung involvement, often with bilateral lung infiltrates and respiratory rate > 30 breaths per minute, severe respiratory distress and SpO2 < 90% in room air. The severity was categorized as not severe (asymptomatic, mild, and moderate) and severe disease.
Comorbidity, in this context, refers to the concurrent presence of one or multiple underlying health conditions or diseases such as diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension, obesity, kidney disease, cancer, sickle cell anaemia etc., alongside the COVID-19 infection.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD or median (IQR), depending on their distribution. Categorical variables were compared between deceased and discharged patients using the Chi-square test and continuous variables by using the Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Bivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relative impact of predictor variables on the outcome (discharge or death) while controlling for potential confounding factors. Multiple variables were adjusted in the logistic regression models. Results were presented with tables. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Sixty-four confirmed cases of COVID-19 were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 60.30 ± 17.28 years, with a range of 23 to 89 years. Male gender accounted for more than two-thirds of the patient population (Table 1).
Table 1. Comparison of clinical and radiological characteristics of patients.
| Variables | All patients n=64 | Discharged n=50 | Deceased n=14 | X2-chisquare |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 44(68.8) | 32(72.7) | 12(27.3) | |
| Female | 20(31.3) | 18(90.0) | 2(10.0) | 0.112 |
| Shortness of breath | ||||
| No | 9(14.1) | 8(88.9) | 1(11.1) | |
| Yes | 55(85.9) | 42(76.4) | 13(23.6) | 0.399 |
| Fever | ||||
| No | 8(12.5) | 7(87.5) | 1(12.5) | |
| Yes | 55(87.5) | 43(76.8) | 13(23.6) | 0.479 |
| Muscle ache | ||||
| No | 36(56.3) | 28(77.8) | 8(22.2) | |
| Yes | 28(43.8) | 22(78.6) | 6(21.4) | 0.939 |
| Sore throat | ||||
| No | 61(95.3) | 47(77.0) | 14(23.3) | |
| Yes | 3(4.7) | 3(6.0) | 0 | 0.348 |
| Loss of smell | ||||
| No | 60(93.8) | 47(78.3) | 13(21.7) | |
| Yes | 4(6.3) | 3(75.0) | 1(25.0) | 0.876 |
| Loss of taste | ||||
| No | 57(89.1) | 44(77.2) | 13(23.8) | |
| Yes | 7(10.1) | 6(85.7) | 1(14.3) | 0.607 |
| Headache | ||||
| No | 60(93.8) | 47(78.3) | 13(21.7) | |
| Yes | 4(6.3) | 3(75.0) | 1(25.0) | 0.89 |
| Chest pain | ||||
| No | 54(84.4) | 41(75.9) | 13(24.1) | |
| Yes | 10(15.6) | 9(90.0) | 1(10.0) | 0.323 |
| Vomiting | ||||
| No | 60(93.8) | 46(76.7) | 14(23.3) | |
| Yes | 4(6.3) | 4(100.0) | 0 | 0.274 |
| Tiredness | ||||
| No | 14(21.9) | 11(78.6) | 3(21.4) | |
| Yes | 50(78.1) | 39(78.0) | 11(22.0) | 0.964 |
| Diarrhoea | ||||
| No | 63(98.4) | 49(77.8) | 14(22.2) | |
| Yes | 1(1.6) | 1(100.0) | 0 | 0.594 |
| Confusion | ||||
| No | 57(89.1) | 46(80.7) | 11(19.3) | |
| Yes | 7(10.9) | 4(57.1) | 3(42.9) | 0.155 |
| Chest X-ray findings | ||||
| Normal | 20(31.3) | 19(95.0) | 1(5.0) | |
| Abnormal | 44(68.8) | 31(70.5) | 13(29.5) | 0.028 |
The occupation and socio-demographic characteristic of the patients is shown in Table 2, with retirees constituting the majority (26.6%), while medical personnel accounted for about 10%. The majority of the patients are well-educated, with over 90% having completed some form of post-secondary school education. Similarly, a greater proportion were married (90.6%).
Table 2. Occupation distribution of the patients .
a= farmers, self-employed, employed in non-formal sector
| Occupation | Frequency (N%) |
| Retiree | 17(26.6) |
| Trader | 14(21.9) |
| Lecturer &Student | 8(12.5) |
| Medical Personnel | 6(9.4) |
| Government worker | 6(9.4) |
| Politician | 3(4.7) |
| Artisan | 2(23.1) |
| Othersa | 8(12.5) |
The duration of symptoms before diagnosis ranged between one and 21 days, with a median of seven days. The overall mortality was 21.9%, of which patients with severe disease 58(90.6%) accounted for 20.3%. In the majority of cases (71.7%), the radiological findings of the patients showed bilateral homogeneous patchy opacities and peripheral fluffy infiltrates. Other minor findings included pleural effusion and cardiomegaly. However, no chest CT scan was performed due to logistic and financial constraints. Co-morbidities identified among the patients include hypertension (59%) diabetes mellitus (48.4%), heart-related disease (10.9%), obesity (15.6%), and chronic kidney disease (6.3%) (Table 3).
Table 3. Comorbidity condition among the patients.
CKD=chronic kidney disease
| Comorbid | All patients N(%) | Discharged N(%) | Deceased N(%) | Chi-square |
| Diabetes | ||||
| Yes | 31(48.4) | 21(32.8) | 10(15.6) | |
| No | 33(51.6) | 29(45.3) | 4(6.3) | 0.051 |
| Heart diseases | ||||
| Yes | 7(10.9) | 6(9.4) | 1(1.6) | |
| No | 57(89.1) | 44(68.8) | 13(20.3) | 0.607 |
| CKD | ||||
| Yes | 4(6.3) | 2(3.1) | 2(3.1) | |
| No | 60(93.8) | 48(75.0) | 12(18.8) | 0.160 |
| Obesity | ||||
| Yes | 10(15.6) | 6(9.4) | 4(6.3) | |
| No | 54(84.4) | 44(68.8) | 10(15.6) | 0.131 |
| Cancer | ||||
| Yes | 1(1.6) | 0(0.0) | 1(1.6) | |
| No | 63(98.4) | 50(78.1) | 13(20.3) | 0.057 |
| Hypertension | ||||
| Yes | 38(59.4) | 30(46.9) | 8(12.5) | |
| No | 26(40.6) | 20(31.3) | 6(9.4) | 0.847 |
Compared with patients without dyspnoea, a significantly higher proportion of patients who experienced shortness of breath did not survive (20.3% vs 1.6%, χ² = 6.668, p = 0.036). As shown in Table 4, there was also a significant difference in the mean values of respiratory rate, C-reactive protein, serum creatinine, and white blood cell count between the deceased and discharged patients.
Table 4. Clinical and laboratory parameters between discharged and deceased patients.
BP=blood pressure, WBC=white blood cell, CRP=C-reactive protein.
Values in mean ±SD
| Variables | All patients | Discharged | Deceased | p-value |
| Age (years) | 60.30±17.25 | 60±17.13 | 73.50±9.9356 | 0.001 |
| Respiratory rate (Cycle/min) | 33.48±5.54 | 32.56±4.79 | 36.79±6.89 | 0.038 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 132.28±18.33 | 132.24±18.30 | 128.86±18.80 | 0.434 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 80.70±13.22 | 81.46±13.77 | 78.00±11.06 | 0.337 |
| WBC (x109cells/L) | 8.61±5.47 | 7.12±3.94 | 13.72±7.09 | 0.005 |
| Plasma glucose (mmo/L) | 9.78±7.20 | 9.09±6.85 | 12.26±8.12 | 0.352 |
| CRP (mg/dl) | 73.56±52.52 | 59.62±45.44 | 123.36±46.59 | 0.001 |
| PCV(%) | 37.47±5.87 | 35.36±7.44 | 38.07±4.88 | 0.217 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 28.37±4.92 | 28.41±2.25 | 28.36±5.46 | 0.963 |
| Creatinine (µmol/L) | 109.78±64.58 | 96.63±44.15 | 156.70±99.14 | 0.011 |
| Duration on admission(days) | 8.05±3.90 | 8.80±3.74 | 5.36±3.32 | 0.003 |
| SPO2 at admission (%) | 85.45±12.00 | 89.38±6.34 | 71.43± 16.58 | 0.001 |
A logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the predictors of mortality among the patients (Table 5). The logistic regression model was statistically significant, χ2(5) = 30.768, p < 0.0005. The model explained 59.1% (Nagelkerke R²) of the variance in survival and correctly classified 77.8% of cases. Age and duration of admission were found to be significant predictors of death among the patients.
Table 5. Logistic regression assessing the predictors of mortality among the patients.
Variable(s) entered on step 1: gender, age, comorbidity, duration of admission, respiratory rate at admission.
| Variables | B | Wald | df | Sig. | Exp(B) | 95% C.I. |
| Gender (1) | .875 | .757 | 1 | .384 | 2.398 | .334 -17.202 |
| Age | .090 | 4.958 | 1 | .026 | 1.095 | 1.011-1.185 |
| Comorbidity (1) | 1.148 | 1.488 | 1 | .223 | 3.151 | .498-19.920 |
| Duration of admission | -.419 | 6.067 | 1 | .014 | .658 | .471-.918 |
| Respiratory rate at admission | .111 | 2.399 | 1 | .121 | 1.118 | .971 -1.287 |
| Constant | -9.445 | 6.481 | 1 | .011 | .000 |
Discussion
The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 varies from asymptomatic infection or mild upper respiratory tract illness to severe interstitial pneumonia with respiratory failure and death. Studies have shown that the prominent symptoms of this viral infection include fever or chills, cough, dyspnoea, fatigue, myalgia, loss of taste or smell, sore throat, runny nose, nausea or vomiting, diarrhoea, and in some cases, other organs and systems are also affected. These symptomatologies were reflected in our patients. We found that the average age was 60.3 years, and most patients were male. The most common symptoms were fever, shortness of breath, cough, and tiredness. Co-morbidities identified among our patient included hypertension and diabetes mellitus among others. The most common radiological findings were bilateral homogeneous patchy opacities and peripheral fluffy infiltrates. The overall mortality rate was 21.9%, with 13 deaths in patients with severe disease. Age and duration of admission were found to be significant predictors of death.
In this study, more than two-thirds of the patients affected were male. This is similar to the study done in Thailand [9], Singapore [10], and China [11] but in contrast to other studies that reported more female prevalence [12,13]. Our retrospective study corroborates this observation and is consistent with findings from previous reports [14,15]. It has been documented that SARS-CoV-2 has a male bias in severity and mortality, which is consistent with previous coronavirus pandemics such as SARS-CoV and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [16]. This gender disparity further underscores the complex interplay of biological, immunological, and socio-demographic factors influencing COVID-19 outcomes [17].
In this study, the most common presenting symptoms were fever (87.5%), shortness of breath (87.3%), cough (79.7%), and tiredness (78.1%). The high prevalence of fever was similar to reports from other studies [18,19] but contrary to some previous studies that reported that fatigue, sore throat, shortness of breath and rhinorrhoea were the most common presenting symptoms [12,13,20].
The prevalence of loss of smell was low in our study, at only 6.3%. This is similar to the report of Pouw et al. (6.4%) [21] but in contrast to other studies that reported a high prevalence of anosmia (37.5%) [22]. Loss of smell and taste have been reported to be frequent symptoms among patients from Europe and the US more than among patients from China during the early pandemic [23].
Clinically, the progression of COVID-19 can be unpredictable. Some individuals may experience rapid deterioration from mild to severe symptoms, while others may remain asymptomatic or have only very mild symptoms throughout the course of their infection. For instance, loss of taste and smell are early symptoms of COVID-19 that may not be present in all cases [23].
The duration of symptoms before the diagnosis can vary depending on the type and severity of symptoms, the availability and accessibility of testing, and the individual's health status and behaviour. The median duration of symptoms before diagnosis in our study was seven days, this is within the normal range of incubation period of 2 to 14 days for COVID-19. However, some patients may have longer or shorter incubation periods, or may not develop any symptoms at all [24].
Confusion, headache, vomiting, and diarrhoea were documented in our study. These symptoms may mimic other diseases, but they can also be symptoms of COVID-19. Chest pain and muscle aches were also documented among our patients, similar to other reports. These symptoms are more likely to be related to COVID-19 if they occur with other respiratory symptoms.
The chest X-ray findings among our patients are similar to reports from other studies [10,25,26]. Patients who exhibited symptoms of COVID-19 typically experienced pronounced lung inflammation, which often led to the progression of the disease. Among these symptomatic patients, there was an increased likelihood of developing bilateral pneumonia and a decreased probability of pneumonia improvement compared to asymptomatic patients [25].
Overall, we recorded a mortality of 21.9% among the patients. A high mortality rate was observed among those who presented with initial symptoms of shortness of breath, in contrast to the report of Adekanmbi et al. [14] who reported a low death rate among patients with shortness of breath. Shortness of breath may be subjective hence it may not represent the actual severity of patients. A considerably higher number of patients experiencing shortness of breath did not survive compared to those who were discharged; 13 (20.3%) versus 1 (1.6%), χ² (2) = 6.668, p = 0.036.
We found a higher mortality rate of 17.2% among the elderly patients compared to 4.7% in the middle-aged patients (p = 0.014). In this study, 51.6% of the patients had one or more comorbid diseases. This was lower than the findings of Adekanmbi et al. (89.5%), who conducted a study in the same geographical region of the country [14], and a US study (55%) [27]. However, it was higher than the findings of Alasia et al. (32.8%)[28] and other studies conducted in Singapore 28.3% [10], China 15.8%[25] and Myanmar 37.8% [12]. This difference might be due to variations in the occurrence of chronic illnesses based on age, gender distribution, and geographical location.
Similar to the report of Adekanmbi et al. [14], hypertension (59.4%) was the most common underlying comorbidity in our patients. Other comorbidities included heart-related disease, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. Studies have demonstrated that older age, the presence of underlying diseases, and presenting symptoms such as shortness of breath and diarrhoea are poor prognostic indicators in hospitalized COVID-19 patients [14,29].
Limitations
As with any observational descriptive study that uses pre-existing data which may not be sufficient enough to identify predictors of mortality but rather a comparison of variables among the discharged or deceased patient due to a risk of incomplete documentation or misclassification of baseline characteristics. Additionally, the study's small sample size and single-centre design limit the generalizability of its findings.
Conclusions
This retrospective study sheds light on the distinct characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 cases in our isolated centre in an urban city in South-West Nigeria. The findings underscore the multifaceted interplay of age, sex, presenting symptoms and co-morbidity in influencing the progression and outcome of COVID-19 cases. By delving into the local context, this study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the virus's impact on the Nigerian population. A comparison of our results with studies conducted globally reveals both similarities and differences. While age, presenting symptoms and comorbidity emerge as consistent determinants of COVID-19 severity across various populations, the intricate interaction of these factors with gender varies in its effect. These findings highlight the importance of considering the unique demographic and epidemiological factors of each region to tailor effective public health strategies and clinical interventions.
As the world continues to grapple with the COVID-19 pandemic and other emerging infectious diseases, collaborative research efforts across diverse populations remain pivotal. Our study underscores the significance of integrating local data into the global discourse to enrich our collective understanding of the disease. This research emphasizes the need for targeted interventions aimed at vulnerable subgroups, including the elderly and individuals with pre-existing health conditions. It is imperative that we continue to explore and analyse the multifactorial determinants of COVID-19 outcomes across diverse populations. Through such concerted efforts, we can advance our knowledge, refine our strategies, and ultimately work towards a healthier and more resilient world.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Samuel A. Dada, Bolade F. Dele-Ojo, Taiwo H. Raimi, Peter Ojo, Adekunle O. Adeoti, Joseph O. Fadare, Mojeed O. Rafiu, Oluwamayowa E. Dada, Jimoh K. Olabanji
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Samuel A. Dada, Taiwo H. Raimi, Peter Ojo, Adekunle O. Adeoti, Oluwamayowa E. Dada, Jimoh K. Olabanji
Drafting of the manuscript: Samuel A. Dada, Bolade F. Dele-Ojo, Taiwo H. Raimi, Peter Ojo, Joseph O. Fadare, Mojeed O. Rafiu, Jimoh K. Olabanji
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Samuel A. Dada, Bolade F. Dele-Ojo, Taiwo H. Raimi, Peter Ojo, Adekunle O. Adeoti, Mojeed O. Rafiu, Oluwamayowa E. Dada, Jimoh K. Olabanji
Supervision: Samuel A. Dada, Joseph O. Fadare, Jimoh K. Olabanji
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Ethical Review Committee at Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital (EKSUTH), Ado Ekiti, Nigeria issued approval EKSUTH/A67/2020/01/016
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM. Lancet. 2020;395:689–697. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30260-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.The novel coronavirus originating in Wuhan, China: challenges for global health governance. Phelan AL, Katz R, Gostin LO. JAMA. 2020;323:709–710. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.WHO Health Emergency Dashboard. (2023) [ Sep; 2023 ]. 2023. https://covid19.who.int/region/afro/country/ng https://covid19.who.int/region/afro/country/ng
- 4.Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Clinical profile of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in first & second wave of the pandemic: insights from an Indian registry based observational study. Kumar G, Mukherjee A, Sharma RK, et al. Indian J Med Res. 2021;153:619–628. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1628_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Categorization of COVID-19 severity to determine mortality risk. Garry EM, Weckstein AR, Quinto K, et al. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022;31:721–728. doi: 10.1002/pds.5436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.World Health Organization Clinical management of COVID-19: interim guidance. [ Sep; 2023 ]. 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332196. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332196.
- 9.Clinical course and potential predictive factors for pneumonia of adult patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): a retrospective observational analysis of 193 confirmed cases in Thailand. Pongpirul WA, Wiboonchutikul S, Charoenpong L, et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clinical features and predictors of severity in COVID-19 patients with critical illness in Singapore. Puah SH, Young BE, Chia PY, et al. Sci Rep. 2021;11:7477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81377-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clinical characteristics and related risk factors of disease severity in 101 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Wuhan, China. Liu XQ, Xue S, Xu JB, Ge H, Mao Q, Xu XH, Jiang HD. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2022;43:64–75. doi: 10.1038/s41401-021-00627-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Initial presenting symptoms, comorbidities and severity of COVID-19 patients during the second wave of epidemic in Myanmar. Htun YM, Win TT, Aung A, et al. Trop Med Health. 2021;49:62. doi: 10.1186/s41182-021-00353-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Relationship of socio-demographics, comorbidities, symptoms and healthcare access with early COVID-19 presentation and disease severity. Vaughan L, Veruttipong D, Shaw JG, Levy N, Edwards L, Winget M. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:40. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05764-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Adekanmbi O, Ilesanmi O, Idowu O, et al. Afr Health Sci. 2023;23:72–82. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Characterization of post-COVID-19 clinical manifestations among patients visiting a post-COVID-19 clinic in a tertiary care center: a descriptive study. C S, Rajaram M, Ramakrishnan J, Govindaraj V, Mahesh Babu V, Adithan S, Wyawahare M. Cureus. 2023;15:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sex-based differences in severity and mortality in COVID-19. Alwani M, Yassin A, Al-Zoubi RM, et al. Rev Med Virol. 2021;31:0. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sex differences in COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality. Gomez JM, Du-Fay-de-Lavallaz JM, Fugar S, et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2021;30:646–653. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Clinical characteristics and predictors of 28-day mortality in 352 critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study. Alharthy A, Aletreby W, Faqihi F, et al. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021;11:98–104. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.200928.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fever as a predictor of adverse outcomes in COVID-19. Chew NW, Ngiam JN, Tham SM, et al. QJM. 2021;114:706–714. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcab023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clinical implication and risk factor of pneumonia development in mild coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Lee HW, Yoon SY, Lee JK, Park TY, Kim DK, Chung HS, Heo EY. Korean J Intern Med. 2021;36:1–10. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Clinical characteristics and outcomes of 952 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in The Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study. Pouw N, van de Maat J, Veerman K, et al. PLoS One. 2021;16:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Efficacy and safety of oral corticosteroids and olfactory training in the management of COVID-19-related loss of smell. Le Bon SD, Konopnicki D, Pisarski N, Prunier L, Lechien JR, Horoi M. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278:3113–3117. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06520-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Differential COVID-19 symptoms given pandemic locations, time, and comorbidities during the early pandemic. Wang Y, Zhang F, Byrd JB, Yu H, Ye X, He Y. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:770031. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.770031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1199–1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with non-severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have similar clinical features and virological courses: a retrospective single center study. Li Y, Shi J, Xia J, et al. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1570. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:425–434. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Clinical features and outcomes of 105 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Seattle, Washington. Buckner FS, McCulloch DJ, Atluri V, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:2167–2173. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of 646 hospitalised SARS-Cov-2 positive patients in Rivers State Nigeria: a prospective observational study. Alasia D, Owhonda G, Maduka O, et al. Pan Afr Med J. 2021;38:25. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.25.26755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, et al. BMJ. 2020;368:0. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
