Skip to main content
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment logoLink to Brain Tumor Research and Treatment
. 2023 Oct 27;11(4):281–288. doi: 10.14791/btrt.2023.0030

Primary Intracranial Ewing Sarcoma With EWSR1-FLI1 Gene Translocation Mimicking a Meningioma and a Multidisciplinary Therapeutic Approach: A Case Report and Systematic Review of Literatures

Changjun Hyun 1,*, Yeonju Lee 1,*, Ho Kang 2, Hyun Joo Park 2, Koung Jin Suh 3, Byung Se Choi 4, Gheeyoung Choe 5, Chae-Yong Kim 2,
PMCID: PMC10641314  PMID: 37953453

Abstract

Ewing sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (ES/pPNET) is an undifferentiated malignant tumor that is most prevalent in children and young adults and often radiologically mimics a meningioma. A 38-year-old female patient visited our hospital with complaints of right-sided tinnitus, right hemiparesis, and imbalance. She underwent preoperative imaging and was subsequently diagnosed as having a meningioma on the petrous ridge. After partial resection, EWSR1-FLI1 gene fusion was confirmed, and she was diagnosed with ES/pPNET. The tumor was successfully treated using a multidisciplinary approach of adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy. This case is noteworthy because it is an extremely rare case of an intracranial ES/pPNET, and it is worth sharing our clinical experience that the tumor was successfully treated through a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach even though complete resection was not achieved.

Keywords: Ewing sarcoma, Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor, Meningioma, EWSR1, FLI1

INTRODUCTION

Ewing sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (ES/pPNET) is an undifferentiated malignant tumor with small and round cells radiologically mimicking meningioma [1,2,3,4]. ES/pPNET arises from soft tissues and long bones in children and young adults, whereas it is rarely reported in adults due to its extremely low incidence [1,5,6]. A meningioma is not always treated immediately but is rather subjected to a wait-and-see strategy. Unlike a meningioma, ES/pPNET is a malignant tumor that requires chemotherapy and radiotherapy, so it is crucial to distinguish ES/pPNET from meningioma [5,6,7,8,9]. However, differentiating between ES/pNET and meningioma is challenging for neurosurgeons and neurooncologists because of their radiological similarity to an extra-axial tumor with a well-demarcated margin and contrast enhancement.

In this study, we have introduced a case of an intracranial ES/pPNET in a 38-year-old female patient who was clinically diagnosed as having a meningioma before surgery and underwent a multidisciplinary treatment approach.

CASE REPORT

A 38-year-old female patient visited the outpatient clinic with right-sided tinnitus, right hemiparesis, and imbalance. Her hearing was preserved with a pure-tone average of 9 dB and 100% speech audiometry score. The muscle strength of all of her extremities was preserved, as indicated by a Medical Research Council scale of 5; however, she could only ambulate with assistance because of imbalance.

Axial T2-weighted MRI shows a large, 4.4×5.6×6.0 cm solid and cystic mass located on the right petrous ridge, extending to both the middle and posterior cranial fossae. The mass has displaced the pons to the left side. The central solid portion of the tumor shows heterogeneous contrast enhancement, a low apparent diffusion coefficient, and increased cerebral blood volume, suggesting high cellularity and hypervascularity (Fig. 1A-E). An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission topography (PET) scan of the whole body and brain did not reveal any other abnormal hypermetabolic lesions that suggested malignancy, apart from the right tentorial mass (Fig. 1F). Comprehensively, the tumor was clinically diagnosed as a meningioma.

Fig. 1. Preoperative images of the patient: T1-weighted image (A), T2-weighted image (B), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (C), ADC map (D), and CBV map (E) of MRI; and 18F-FDG PET/CT (F). ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; CBV, cerebral blood volume; FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Fig. 1

Operative findings

In the supine position under general anesthesia, the head was rotated 90 degrees to the left and fixed using a Mayfield fixator. After an inverted U-shaped skin incision centered on the ear, the temporal base was exposed, and a combined approach with supra- and infratentorial approaches was performed. A dark reddish-colored tumor was exposed when the temporal base was retracted upward. The tumor was soft enough to be sucked out by an ultrasonic surgical aspirator in an outside-to-inside manner. On intraoperative frozen section biopsy, a highly cellular neoplasm was reported, and the possibility of meningioma, hemangiopericytoma, or glial tumors was not observed. The tumor was partially resected. The bone flap was not closed after duroplasty using artificial dura mater due to swelling of the temporal lobe, and extraventricular drainage (EVD) was performed through right Kocher’s point after the patient’s position was changed.

Pathologic findings

In the hematoxylin and eosin stain, monotonous cells with large nuclei were observed, and pseudorosettes with necrosis were also observed (Fig. 2A). It showed high cellularity and up to four mitoses per ten high power fields (Ki-67 index, 8%). Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CD99 and vimentin and negative for specific markers for glioma, meningioma, hemangiopericytoma, and melanoma, such as GFAP, vimentin, EMA, CD34, and HMB45 (Fig. 2B-E). On fluorescence in situ hybridization using dual-color break-apart rearrangement probes that flank the EWSR1 breakpoint, the nucleus of the tumor showed split red and green signals, indicating a rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene at 22q12 (Fig. 2F). EWSR1-FLI1 (11:22) translocation was confirmed in whole exome sequencing with a mean depth of 875.2 and 100X coverage of 98.2% using the GRCh37/hg19 genome as a reference, and there was no copy number variation. The tumor was diagnosed as ES/pPNET.

Fig. 2. Pathologic results of the patient. Tissue stained by hematoxylin and eosin (A), immunohistochemically stained by GFAP (B), VMA (C), CD99 (D), and vimentin (E), and tissue with fluorescence in situ hybridization using dual-color break-apart rearrangement probes which flank the EWSR1 breakpoint (F). Pseudorosette formation and rearranged chromosome 22 are annotated by white triangles (A) and arrows (B), respectively. GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; VMA, vimentin antibodies; CD, cluster of differentiation.

Fig. 2

Postoperative treatment and prognosis

Because weaning of the EVD failed, endoscopic third ventriculostomy was performed on postoperative day (POD) 13, and a VAC regimen, consisting of vincristine, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide, was started at POD 23 (Fig. 3A and B). An IE regimen, consisting of ifosfamide and etoposide, was started at POD 44 and then the VAC and IE regimens were alternated every 2 weeks. At the end of the third cycle of the VAC/IE regimen (3 months after surgery), most of the volumes of the residual tumors were reduced, thereby corresponding to a partial response according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria (Fig. 3C). At 4 months after surgery, radiotherapy was performed with 55 Gy in 25 fractions. After completing the 11th cycle of VAC/IE chemotherapy regimen (10 months after surgery), no residual tumor was seen on MRI, indicating a complete response according to the RANO criteria (Fig. 3D). She was followed up for 12 months after resection, and the 8th cycle of VAC/IE was completed. Her Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score was 1 and her Karnofsky performance scale score was 90. There were no complications related to chemotherapy other than mild neutropenia.

Fig. 3. Postoperative images of the patient: T2-weighted image at POD 15 (A), CT at POD 31 (B), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image 3 months after surgery (C), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image 10 months after surgery (D). POD, postoperative day.

Fig. 3

Systematic review of the literature

A literature search was conducted on the electronic PubMed database up to September 1, 2023, and limited to adult cases. Only articles written in English were subjected. The terms intracranial primary Ewing’s sarcoma or intracranial pPNET and various combinations of the words, central nervous system, dural, osseous, Ewing sarcoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumor, and intracranial, were used.

Previously reported adult cases with primary intracranial ES/pPNET were summarized in Table 1[2,3,4,5,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. We identified 19 adult primary intracranial ES/pPNET patients from 18 papers, with a mean age of 40 years (standard deviation, 15 years) and a male-to-female ratio of 8:11. There were 3 cases with tumors located at the cerebellopontine angle, 1 with the tumor located in the posterior fossa, and the rest had supratentorial lesions. In 14 cases, the tumors were sufficiently removed with subtotal resection or more. Among these 14 cases, one was initially misdiagnosed as meningioma but experienced a recurrence 7 years later, necessitating a reoperation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Among the remaining 13 patients, 5 (38.5%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and 8 (61.5%) underwent only adjuvant radiotherapy. Among 6 patients who underwent only a biopsy or partial resection, 5 received both adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The other patient died due to the rapid progression of the disease while waiting for chemotherapy after radiation therapy.

Table 1. Summary of cases of adult primary intracranial Ewing sarcoma (peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor) reported in the literature.

Author/year Age (yr)/sex Initial symptom Site Tumor maximal diameter (cm) Contrast enhancement Cystic feature Dural base Bone involvement Initial metastasis Extent of resection EWSR1-FLI1 fusion Chemotherapy Radiotherapy Follow-up period (months) Outcome
Present 38/F Tinnitus, hemiparesis Petrous ridge, right 6.0 Y Y Y N N PR NGS (WES) VAC/IE until 48 weeks 55 Gy in 25 Fx 12 Alive/controlled
Geng et al./2023 [3] 21/F IICP signs* Bilateral PL 4.0 Y Y Y N N STR NGS N 60 Gy in 30 Fx 6 Alive/controlled
Deshpande et al./2021 [2] 33/M IICP signs* Left TL NA NA NA NA NA NA Excision RT-PCR VAC/IE until 48 weeks 55.8 Gy in 31 Fx 18 Alive/controlled
Deshpande et al./2021 [2] 33/F Left eye movement impairment, left frontal swelling Left FL NA NA NA NA NA NA Excision FISH VC until 2 weeks (discontinued due to intolerance) 54 Gy in 30 Fx 17 Alive/recurred after 17 months
Jiang et al./2020 [4] 55/F Memory impairment Left FL 6.5 Y Y Y N N GTR FISH N Y 18 Alive
Cherif El Asri et al./2018 [5] 28/M IICP signs,* left V, VI, VII, VIII, and lower cranial nerves palsies Left CPA 5.0 Y N Y N N PR FISH VCD/IE x1 56 Gy 3 Died due to nosocomial pneumopathy
Ke et al./2017 [10] 43/M Epilepsy Right PL NA Y NA Y N N GTR FISH VACA/VAIA 50 Gy 48 Alive
Kumar et al./2017 [11] 22/M Seizure, right hemiparesis Left FL 8.8 Y N Y Y N GTR NA Y Y 7 Alive/controlled
VandenHeuvel et al./2015 [12] 61/M Motor dysphasia and left-sided weakness Right TL 6.2 Y Y Y NA N GTR FISH N N NA NA
Salunke et al./2014 [13] 52/M IICP sign,* fever, diminution of vision, and ataxia Posterior fossa 6.0 Y NA Y Y N NTR NA VAC/IE until 16 weeks 50 Gy 10 Died/locally recurred after 10 months
Cole et al./2014 [14] 51/F Visual disturbance Left TL + PL 3.5 Y N Y N N GTR FISH VCD/IE x4 VAC/IE x10 N 24 Alive
Tanboon et al./2012 [9] 22/F Enlarging skull mass in right frontal resion Right FL 8.0 Y N Y Y N STR FISH N N 6 Died
Antonelli et al./2011 [15] 37/M Comatose state following IICP sign* Right FL + TL NA Y Y Y N N GTR RT-PCR N Y 5 Alive/controlled
Mellai et al./2010 [16] 56/F IICP sign,* left hemiparesis Right TL NA Y Y Y Y NA GTR RT-PCR N N 18 Alive/controlled
Attabib et al./2006 [17] 48/F Headache and left maxillary and oculomotor nerve palsies Lt cavernous sinus 4.0 Y N N N N STR RT-PCR VCD/IE 54 Gy 14 Alive/controlled
Mobley et al./2006 [18] 21/M IICP sign,* diplopia, left partial homonymous hemianopia Right OL 3.5 Y N Y N N PR Karyotyping VACA 54 Gy 21 Alive/recurred after 18 months
D’Antonio et al./2004 [19] 50/F IICP sign* Right TL NA Y N Y NA N GTR FISH N N 12 Alive
Simmons et al./2001 [20] 67/F Right facial pain, facial palsy, hearing disturbance, headache Right CPA NA Y NA N N N Biopsy NA N Y 13 Died/rapid decline following no symptoms progression for 13 months
Kalamarides et al./2001 [21] 34/F Vertigo, tinnitus, gait disturbance Left CPA 1.8 Y N Y Y N STR NA N 55 Gy 12 Alive/controlled
Papotti et al./1998 [22] 30/F Headache, vertigo Right FL (2 lesions) 7 and 4 NA NA Y NA NA GTR (misdiagnosed as a meningioma) RT-PCR VAC (at 9 years after initial surgery) 50 Gy (misdiagnosed as a meningioma) 120 Died/recurred twice at 7 and 9 years after initial surgery

*IICP signs included headache, nausea, vomiting, or loss of consciousness. M, male; F, female; IICP, increased intracranial pressure; PL, parietal lobe; FL, frontal lobe; TL, temporal lobe; OL, occipital lobe; CPA, cerebellopontine angle; NA, not applicable (or no information); Y, yes; N, no; GTR, gross total resection; NTR, near total resection; STR, subtotal resection; PR, partial resection; NGS, next generation sequencing; WES, whole exome sequencing; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; VAC, vincristine, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide; IE, ifosfamide and etoposide; VC, vincristine and cyclophosphamide; VCD, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin; VACA, vincristine, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin; VAIA, vincristine, adriamycin, ifosfamide, and dactinomycin; Fx, fractions

DISCUSSION

In this case, the tumor was preoperatively misdiagnosed as a meningioma but was successfully controlled through a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach using both chemotherapy and radiotherapy following partial resection.

Because of the rarity of intracranial ES/pPNETs, there are only a few previous reports, and its true incidence has not revealed, so findings on preoperative images should be used for the differential diagnosis [2,3,5,23]. However, some previous reports have suggested that heterogeneous contrast enhancement is the key point for distinguishing ES/pPNET [4,24]. In the present case, heterogeneous enhancement was also observed, but heterogeneous contrast enhancement on preoperative images is not a highly specific radiological finding, which can also be seen in some other tumors, such as meningioma or hemangiopericytoma. In addition, the patient was 38 years old, which was different from most previous reports for ES/pPNETs where the patients were children or young adults. Therefore, differentiating ES/pPNETs from other mimicking tumors preoperatively is very challenging for neurosurgeons and neurooncologists. Ultimately, surgical tissue confirmation and laboratory testing for gene translocation are essential for the diagnosis of ES/pPNET with EWSR1-FLI1 gene fusion.

What differentiates this case from previous reports is that the response to chemotherapy only was prominent [1,3,4,5,23]. Adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for the treatment of ES/pPNET is known to be helpful in controlling ES/pPNET, especially when complete resection is not achieved. However, the regimen has not yet been standardized. One of the most frequently reported chemotherapy regimens thus far is the VAC/IE regimen, and in this case, after the administration of only three cycles of the VAC/IE regimen, most of the tumor was already reduced even before radiotherapy, despite an infratentorial location known to show a poor prognosis. This multidisciplinary approach is crucial for the treatment of ES/pPNETs.

ES/Ppnet is a malignant tumor with an unfavorable prognosis that is difficult to differentiate from other mimicking tumors before surgery. However, in this case, despite incomplete tumor resection, the tumor was well controlled by both chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Footnotes

Ethics Statement: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (No. B-2307-840-701) and conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The patient provided written informed consent.

Author Contributions:
  • Conceptualization: Chae-Yong Kim.
  • Data acquisition: Koung Jin Suh, Byung Se Choi, Gheeyoung Choe.
  • Data curation: Ho Kang, Hyun Joo Park.
  • Supervision: Chae-Yong Kim.
  • Visualization: Changjun Hyun, Yeonju Lee, Ho Kang, Hyun Joo Park.
  • Writing—original draft: Changjun Hyun, Yeonju Lee.
  • Writing—review & editing: Changjun Hyun, Yeonju Lee, Ho Kang.

Conflicts of Interest: Chae-Yong Kim, a contributing editor of Brain Tumor Research and Treatment, was not involved in the editorial evaluation or decision to publish this article. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement: None

Availability of Data and Material

The institutional data used in this study is not publicly available due to protection of private patient health information. The data is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request after anonymization.

References

  • 1.Chen J, Cheng R, Fan F, Zheng Y, Li Y, Chen Y, et al. Cranial Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors: a retrospective study focused on prognostic factors and long-term outcomes. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1023. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Deshpande G, Epari S, Gupta C, Shetty O, Gurav M, Chinnaswamy G, et al. Primary intracranial Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor, an entity of unacquaintance: a series of 8 cases. Childs Nerv Syst. 2021;37:839–849. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04850-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Geng Z, Gao W, Cheng W, Wu A. Primary intracranial Ewing sarcoma invading the superior sagittal sinus with EWSR1-FLI1 gene fusion and EWSR1 gene mutation: a case report and literature review. World Neurosurg. 2023;175:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jiang Y, Zhao L, Wang Y, Liu X, Wu X, Li Y. Primary intracranial Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor mimicking meningioma: a case report and literature review. Front Oncol. 2020;10:528073. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.528073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cherif El Asri A, Benzagmout M, Chakour K, Chaoui MF, Laaguili J, Chahdi H, et al. Primary intracranial pPNET/Ewing sarcoma: diagnosis, management, and prognostic factors dilemma–a systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2018;115:346–356. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yim J, Lee WS, Kim SK, Kang HJ, Bae J, Park SH. Intracranial Ewing sarcoma with whole genome study. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019;35:547–552. doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-3997-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Haveman LM, Ranft A, Berg HVD, Klco-Brosius S, Ladenstein R, Paulussen M, et al. Primary and metastatic intracranial Ewing sarcoma at diagnosis: retrospective international study and systematic review. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:1675. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mazur MA, Gururangan S, Bridge JA, Cummings TJ, Mukundan S, Fuchs H, et al. Intracranial Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005;45:850–856. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tanboon J, Sitthinamsuwan B, Paruang T, Marrano P, Thorner PS. Primary intracranial Ewing sarcoma with an unusually aggressive course: a case report and review of the literature. Neuropathology. 2012;32:293–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2011.01258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ke Ch, Duan Q, Yang H, Zhu F, Yan M, Xu SP, et al. Meningeal Ewing sarcoma/peripheral PNET: clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and FISH study of four cases. Neuropathology. 2017;37:35–44. doi: 10.1111/neup.12325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kumar V, Singh A, Sharma V, Kumar M. Primary intracranial dural-based Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor mimicking a meningioma: a rare tumor with review of literature. Asian J Neurosurg. 2017;12:351–357. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.185060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.VandenHeuvel KA, Al-Rohil RN, Stevenson ME, Qian J, Gross NL, McNall-Knapp R, et al. Primary intracranial Ewing’s sarcoma with unusual features. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:260–274. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Salunke P, Sharma M, Gupta K. Ewing sarcoma of the occipital bone in an elderly patient. World Neurosurg. 2014;81:e10–e12. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.12.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cole M, Parajuli S, Laske D, Goldstein L, Morrison T, Mukherjee A, et al. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the dura in a 51-year-old woman following intensive treatment for breast cancer. Am J Case Rep. 2014;15:294–299. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.890656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Antonelli M, Caltabiano R, Chiappetta C, Oliva MA, Giangaspero F, Lanzafame S. Primary peripheral PNET/Ewing’s sarcoma arising in the meninges, confirmed by the presence of the rare translocation t(21;22) (q22;q12) Neuropathology. 2011;31:549–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2010.01196.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mellai M, Caldera V, Comino A, Fortunato M, Bernucci C, Schiffer D. PNET/ESFT of the cranial vault: a case report. Clin Neuropathol. 2010;29:372–377. doi: 10.5414/npp29372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Attabib NA, West M, Rhodes RH. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cavernous sinus: case report. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:E992. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000210215.73374.EE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mobley BC, Roulston D, Shah GV, Bijwaard KE, McKeever PE. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor/Ewing’s sarcoma of the craniospinal vault: case reports and review. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:845–853. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.D’Antonio A, Caleo A, Garcia JF, Marsilia GM, De Dominicis G, Boscaino A. Primary peripheral PNET/Ewing’s sarcoma of the dura with FISH analysis. Histopathology. 2004;45:651–654. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01961.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Simmons MA, Luff DA, Banerjee SS, Ramsden RT. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour (pPNET) of the cerebellopontine angle presenting in adult life. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115:848–852. doi: 10.1258/0022215011909161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kalamarides M, Dewolf E, Couvelard A, Shahidi A, Bouccara D, Cyna-Gorse F, et al. Extraaxial primitive neuroectodermal tumor mimicking a vestibular schwannoma: diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:612–616. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.94.4.0612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Papotti M, Abbona G, Pagani A, Monga G, Bussolati G. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the meninges: an histological, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and cytogenetic study. Endocr Pathol. 1998;9:275–280. doi: 10.1007/BF02739968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huguenard AL, Li YD, Sharifai N, Perkins SM, Dahiya S, Chicoine MR. Multifocal primary central nervous system Ewing sarcoma presenting with intracranial hemorrhage and leptomeningeal dissemination: illustrative case. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2021;1:CASE2042. doi: 10.3171/CASE2042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jing Z, Wen-Yi L, Jian-Li L, Jun-Lin Z, Chi D. The imaging features of meningeal Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumours (pPNETs) Br J Radiol. 2014;87:20130631. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The institutional data used in this study is not publicly available due to protection of private patient health information. The data is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request after anonymization.


Articles from Brain Tumor Research and Treatment are provided here courtesy of Korean Brain Tumor Society

RESOURCES