The human microbiome, defined as a personal, genomic signature of our latent or manifest infectious profile (bacterial, viral, fungal), located predominantly in the digestive tract, opens the door to personalized medicine studies on a scale larger than the human genome in terms of data that can be analyzed and interpreted. Compared to the human genome, which has approximately 23,000 genes, the European Metagenomics of the Human Intestinal Tract and the Human Microbiome Project have reported 3.3 million non-redundant microbial genes [1].
The vast majority of normal gut microbiota is composed of four major phyla: Firmicutes (Gram-positive aerobic cocci: Enterococcus spp., and bacilli: Clostridium spp., 60–75%), Bacteroidetes (anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria: Bacteroides spp. and Prevotella spp., 30–40%), Actinobacteria (anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria: Bifidobacterium), and Proteobacteria (aerobic and anaerobic Gram-negative enterobacteria), as well as fungal mycobiota (Candida spp., Saccharomyces spp., Candida albicans) and viral microbiota [2]. Dysbiosis is the consequence of an imbalance between commensal microbes (Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes), which decline, and pathogenic microbes (Proteobacteria), which proliferate.
Enterotypes can be distinguished by specific biomarkers; however, due to the large differences in intestinal enterobiota between healthy individuals and ICU patients, these must be characterized separately. In this context, two microbiota patterns have been proposed for ICU settings: one that includes Bacteroides and certain Enterobacteriaceae correlated with high serum lactate levels (specific to septic patients), and another predominantly including Enterococcus [3].
The dynamics of the microbiome - its dependence on various normal or pathological factors, and particularly its behavior in relation to certain diseases—make the microbiome an important “organ” in intensive care, albeit still insufficiently studied. On the other hand, manipulation of the microbiota to reverse dysbiosis through targeted antibiotic therapy capable of eliminating selected microbiota, as well as the use of probiotics and prebiotics to restore balance in favor of beneficial bacteria, has inspired numerous studies assessing their effectiveness [4].
The factors affecting microbiota changes in ICU patients relate not only to severe organ pathology or multiple organ dysfunction but also to antibiotic usage, and intestinal transit disorders including enteral feeding. Antibiotic-induced dysbiosis is well documented for various drug classes such as lincosamides, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and glycopeptides; it can also occur following the use of NSAIDs, proton pump inhibitors, vasopressors, or opioids [5].
The resistance to colonization of an intact microbiota enhances the ability to combat multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and is directly related to immune status, particularly innate immunity, and less so to adaptive immunity. Dysbiosis alters the permeability of the intestinal mucosa leading to increased systemic passage of bacterial components, metabolites, and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) which in turn triggers the release of pro-inflammatory mediators [6].
The remote impact of intestinal dysbiosis on ICU patients is demonstrated in specific pathologies. For instance, intestinal microbiota appears to influence tracheal microbiota in mechanically ventilated patients, with a higher incidence of Bacteroides spp., an anaerobic gut bacterium, found in the lungs of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) [7], raising the hypothesis of a bidirectional axis between the gut and the lung [8]. Although the link between intestinal dysbiosis and nosocomial infections has been hypothesized, it has not been conclusively confirmed [9]. We are at the present stage where we can consider that alterations in microbiota in critically ill patients make them more susceptible to immune dysfunction and we can identify a decrease in bacterial diversity in critically ill patients, especially in septic patients [10].
Systemic decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD), typically performed through a combination of local administration of non-absorbable antibiotics and a short course of systemic cephalosporin therapy, aims to prevent colonization by pathogenic microorganisms while preserving anaerobic bacteria. The positive effect of this approach, already used widely, has led to a lower rate of infections and mortality rates but has also had the negative effect of increasing bacterial resistance [10].
Methods to prevent intestinal dysbiosis, such as the use of beta-lactamase enzymes and non-specific adsorbent activated charcoal, are in varying phases of study linked to specific classes of antibiotics. Probiotics (e.g., Saccharomyces boulardii, Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp.) have not proven to be as effective as expected. While their use has been associated with a decrease in the incidence of VAP, survival rates have not significantly improved [11]. In addition to these methods, microbiota transplantation has been used as a therapy, especially for Clostridium difficile infections.
Few studies address microbiota in ICU patients, and even fewer link microbiota to personalized medicine, whose importance in the ICU may be key to the future treatment of critically ill patients [12, 13]. The link may be mediated through inflammatory markers (oxygen and nitrogen reactive species, cytokines with genetic polymorphisms that modulate immune response in sepsis and chemokines), metabolites (especially microbial branched-chain amino acids), and gene toxicity [14, 15].
The answers may be found through deep sequencing techniques that identify major differences between individuals, as well as longitudinal studies that capture the dynamics of these microbiotic profiles. The potential for microbiota to serve as biomarkers will be confirmed only by leveraging machine learning capabilities for data processing [16,17,18].
Whether the microbiota will become a next-generation therapeutic tool depends on our ability to characterize the microbiome and integrate it into the advancing genomic revolution that is currently unfolding.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
None to declare.
References
- 1.Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C. et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464:59–65. doi: 10.1038/nature08821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR. et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011;473:174–80. doi: 10.1038/nature09944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu W, Cheng M, Li J, Zhang P, Fan H, Hu Q. et al. Classification of the gut microbiota of patients in intensive care units during development of sepsis and septic shock. Genomics, Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2020;18(6):696–707. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2020.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Amon P, Sanderson I. What is the microbiome? Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2017;102(5):257–60. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Szychowiak P, Villageois-Tran K, Patrier J, Timsit JF, Ruppe E. The role of the microbiota in the management of intensive care patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2022;12(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00976-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wolf AJ, Underhill DM. Peptidoglycan recognition by the innate immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:243–54. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Emonet S, Lazarevic V, Leemann Refondini C, Gaia N, Leo S, Girard M. et al. Identification of respiratory microbiota markers in ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:1082–92. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05660-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wolff NS, Hugenholtz F, Wiersinga WJ. The emerging role of the microbiota in the ICU. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1999-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schlechte J, Zucoloto AZ, Yu IL, Doig CJ, Dunbar MJ, McCoy KD. et al. Dysbiosis of a microbiota–immune metasystem in critical illness is associated with nosocomial infections. Nat Med. 2023;29(4):1017–27. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02243-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lankelma JM, van Vught LA, Belzer C, Schultz MJ, van der Poll T, de Vos WM. et al. Critically ill patients demonstrate large interpersonal variation in intestinal microbiota dysregulation: a pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:59–68. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4613-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Siempos II, Ntaidou TK, Falagas ME. Impact of the administration of probiotics on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:954–62. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c8fe4b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Azamfirei L. Personalized physiological medicine as the future of intensive care medicine. J Crit Care Med. 2022;8(3):143–4. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2022-0020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lazăr A, Azamfirei L. Personalized medicine for the critically ill patient: a narrative review. Processes. 2022;10(6):20230032 [Google Scholar]
- 14.Behrouzi A, Nafari AH, Siadat SD. The significance of microbiome in personalized medicine. Clin Transl Med. 2019;8(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40169-019-0232-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Georgescu AM, Bănescu C, Badea I, Moldovan V, Hutanu A, Voidazan S. et al. IL-6 gene polymorphisms and sepsis in ICU adult Romanian patients: a prospective study. Rev Romana Med Lab. 2017;25(1):75–89. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lazăr A, Georgescu AM, Vitin A, Azamfirei L. Precision Medicine and its role in the treatment of sepsis: a personalised view. J Crit Care Med. 2019;5:90–6. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2019-0017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kashyap PC, Chia N, Nelson H, Segal E, Elinav E. Microbiome at the frontier of personalized medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(12):1855–64. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Di Domenico M, Ballini A, Boccellino M, Scacco S, Lovero R, Charitos IA. et al. The intestinal microbiota may be a potential theranostic tool for personalized medicine. J Pers Med. 2022;12:523. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]