Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1985 Mar;77(3):602–607. doi: 10.1104/pp.77.3.602

Evaluation of a System for the Imposition of Plant Water Stress 1

Michael D Snow 1,2,2, David T Tingey 1,2
PMCID: PMC1064571  PMID: 16664105

Abstract

A system which imposes a range of water stress levels was developed and evaluated. Water stress was controlled by employing a screen to suspend roots above a water column of known height. Levels of water stress were imposed by changing water column height and/or hydraulic conductivity of the medium in the column. The system was evaluated in a series of growth chamber experiments in which sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L. cv NK894) were given three levels of water availability for a period of 3 weeks. Third leaf midday water potentials at the end of the trials ranged from −0.73 ± 0.04 to −2.35 ± 0.17 megapascals in waterstressed plants compared to −0.40 ± 0.02 megapascals for control plants. Repetition of experiments showed no statistical differences in leaf water potentials, plant leaf areas, or plastochron indices between trials. During the experiments, the severity and pattern of water stress developments was related to both water column height and conductivity of the medium. Control plants exhibited normal diurnal water relations and transpirational behavior. Use of this system avoids many problems associated with other techniques and provides a means for subjecting plants to reproducible water stress levels for extended periods of time.

Full text

PDF
602

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyer J. S. Relationship of water potential to growth of leaves. Plant Physiol. 1968 Jul;43(7):1056–1062. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.7.1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cox L. M., Boersma L. Transpiration as a function of soil temperature and soil water stress. Plant Physiol. 1967 Apr;42(4):550–556. doi: 10.1104/pp.42.4.550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Emmert F. H. Inhibition of phosphorus and water passage across intact roots by polyethylene glycol and phenylmercuric acetate. Plant Physiol. 1974 Apr;53(4):663–665. doi: 10.1104/pp.53.4.663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Janes B. E. The effect of molecular size, concentration in nutrient solution, and exposure time on the amount and distribution of polyethylene glycol in pepper plants. Plant Physiol. 1974 Sep;54(3):226–230. doi: 10.1104/pp.54.3.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaufmann M. R., Eckard A. N. Evaluation of water stress control with polyethylene glycols by analysis of guttation. Plant Physiol. 1971 Apr;47(4):453–456. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.4.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mexal J., Fisher J. T., Osteryoung J., Reid C. P. Oxygen availability in polyethylene glycol solutions and its implications in plant-water relations. Plant Physiol. 1975 Jan;55(1):20–24. doi: 10.1104/pp.55.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moinat A. D. AN AUTO-IRRIGATOR FOR GROWING PLANTS IN THE LABORATORY. Plant Physiol. 1943 Apr;18(2):280–287. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.2.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sionit N., Kramer P. J. Water Potential and Stomatal Resistance of Sunflower and Soybean Subjected to Water Stress during Various Growth Stages. Plant Physiol. 1976 Oct;58(4):537–540. doi: 10.1104/pp.58.4.537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tingey D. T., Stockwell C. Semipermeable membrane system for subjecting plants to water stress. Plant Physiol. 1977 Jul;60(1):58–60. doi: 10.1104/pp.60.1.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES