Skip to main content
Acta Cardiologica Sinica logoLink to Acta Cardiologica Sinica
. 2023 Nov;39(6):783–806. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202311_39(6).20230921A

2023 TAMIS/TSOC/TACVPR Consensus Statement for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Rehabilitation

Kuan-Cheng Chen 1,2,3#, Chih-Neng Hsu 4#, Cheng-Hsueh Wu 5, Ko-Lung Lin 6, Shyh-Ming Chen 7, Yuchun Lee 8, Chien-Yi Hsu 9,10, Che-Wei Hsu 1, Chi-Yao Huang 11, Shou-Hsien Huang 2, Chia-Te Liao 12, Christina Soong 13, Po-Wei Chen 14, Shu-Ming Yeh 15, Chang-Cheng Wu 16, Cho-I Lin 17, Nai-Wen Guo 18, Yi-Heng Li 14, Tsung-Hsien Lin 19,20, Chia-Hsin Chen 21,22, Chun-Yao Huang 9, Ssu-Yuan Chen 3,13,23, Yu-Chen Wang 24, Wei-Chun Huang 25,26,27*, Willy Chou 28*, Wen-Jone Chen 29*
PMCID: PMC10646588  PMID: 38022422

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation is a comprehensive intervention recommended in international and Taiwanese guidelines for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Evidence supports that cardiac rehabilitation improves the health-related quality of life, enhances exercise capacity, reduces readmission rates, and promotes survival in patients with cardiovascular disease. The cardiac rehabilitation team is comprehensive and multidisciplinary. The inpatient, outpatient, and maintenance phases are included in cardiac rehabilitation. All patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction should be referred to the rehabilitation department as soon as clinically feasible. Pre-exercise evaluation, including exercise testing, helps physicians identify the risks of cardiac rehabilitation and organize appropriate exercise prescriptions. Therefore, the Taiwan Myocardial Infarction Society (TAMIS), Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC), and Taiwan Academy of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (TACVPR) address this consensus statement to assist healthcare practitioners in performing cardiac rehabilitation in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction, Cardiac rehabilitation, Exercise, Rehabilitation


Abbreviations

6MWT, Six-minute walk test

ACS, Acute coronary syndrome

AMI, Acute myocardial infarction

ASCVD, Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

CABG, Coronary artery bypass graft

CHD, Coronary heart disease

CIND, Cognitive impairment without dementia

CPET, Cardiopulmonary exercise testing

CR, Cardiac rehabilitation

CVD, Cardiovascular disease

DM, Diabetes mellitus

HIIT, High-intensity interval training

HR, Heart rate

HRQoL, Health-related quality of life

ICU, Intensive care unit

LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

MET, Metabolic equivalent

MI, Myocardial infarction

OA, Osteoarthritis

PAD, Peripheral vascular disease

ROM, Range of motion

RPE, Rating of perceived exertion

TACVPR, Taiwan Academy of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation

TAMIS, Taiwan Myocardial Infarction Society

TSOC, Taiwan Society of Cardiology

VO2, Oxygen uptake

1. INTRODUCTION

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a secondary prevention program that improves the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), survival rates, and exercise capacity, and reduces the readmission rates of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD).1-4 Several controlled cohort studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated survival benefits for patients receiving CR after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared with no CR (26% reduction of cardiac mortality and 18% reduction of recurrent hospitalization4), even in the modern era of early revascularization and statin therapy.5-7 In a large and representative community cohort of Dutch patients with ACS or an intervention, CR was associated with a substantial survival benefit of up to 4 years. This survival benefit as present regardless of age, or type of diagnosis or intervention.8 The reduction in mortality rate with CR is dose-dependent,9 with proven cost-effectiveness.10 In addition, exercise-based CR reduces anxiety11 and has been recommended strongly in several ACS guidelines. For example, according to the 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for managing patients with ACS,12 multidisciplinary exercise-based CR is a class I level of evidence. Therefore, it is recommended that individuals diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) should participate in an exercise-oriented CR program.4 This recommendation is an effective means for patients with coronary artery disease to achieve a healthy lifestyle and manage risk factors to reduce all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and improve their HRQoL.4,6,8,12

Early CR is safe and effective with a few major complications such as death, cardiac arrest, and myocardial infarction.13-15 According to the 2020 update of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology’s 2012 guidelines,16 inpatient referral for CR is an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) quality indicator. In addition, the 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force guideline suggests that all eligible patients with non-ST-elevation-ACS are referred to a comprehensive CR program before hospital discharge or during the first outpatient visit.17

Traditionally, CR consists of three phases: inpatient, outpatient, and maintenance. Phase 1 is typically an inpatient service, and early mobilization to prepare for discharge and resuming simple daily living activities is emphasized. It includes brief counseling about the nature of the illness, the treatment, risk factors management, and follow-up planning. Phase 2 is primarily a supervised ambulatory outpatient program; ideally, referral for outpatient CR should occur at hospital discharge. Phase 3 is a lifetime maintenance to continue the risk factor, lifestyle, and exercise training modifications.18,19 The American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation endorses a "cardiovascular continuum of care" model that emphasizes a smooth transition from inpatient to outpatient programs.18

The consensus statement meeting comprised an expert panel of members of the Taiwan Myocardial Infarction Society (TAMIS), Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC), and Taiwan Academy of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (TACVPR). The recommendations for CR protocols focused on a multidisciplinary approach, including diet, risk factor modification, psychosocial management, drug use, and exercise. The experts at the meeting agreed the recommendations in the consensus statement. The disagreements raised were discussed, and the recommendations were adjusted accordingly. Apart from life support care, a proper CR protocol for patients with AMI needs to be established and emphasized in clinical practice in Taiwan.

2. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Exercise-based CR provides cardiac protection by decreasing the incidence of MI and increasing the chance of survival after coronary events.1-3 A recent Cochrane review that included 85 trials and 23,430 people with coronary heart disease (CHD) showed that exercise-based CR is beneficial, including promoting a slight reduction in all-cause mortality, an appreciable decrease in all-cause hospitalization, and improved HRQoL up to 12 months of follow-up.4 The effect of CR on cardiac physiology was mediated by increasing the left ventricular ejection fraction and peak oxygen uptake (VO2) and lowering the resting heart rate (HR), left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and wall motion score index.20 Two mechanisms, physio-pathological and psychosocial, are suggested to explain the effect of CR (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Proposed pathophysiology of cardiac rehabilitation. Arrows indicate connections. CHD, coronary heart disease.

2.1. Physio-pathological mechanism

2.2.1. Exercise reduces cardiovascular risk factors

Exercise-based CR benefits many cardiovascular risk factors, such as arterial hypertension, insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and obesity.21-23 A recent review showed that aerobic exercise, dynamic resistance, and concurrent training effectively lowered blood pressure.24 Isometric exercise’s ability to reduce high blood pressure must be confirmed in future randomized trials. Exercise training can increase insulin sensitivity through multiple glucose transport and metabolism adaptations.25 Increased cardiovascular mortality is associated with being overweight and abnormal body fat distribution, which is improved by exercise.26 Aerobic exercise can lower serum cholesterol levels and improve lipid profiles via a mechanism involving increased lipoprotein lipase activity.27

2.1.2. Exercise induces ischemic preconditioning

Exercise can produce short periods of ischemia and render the myocardium more resistant to subsequent ischemic insults. This phenomenon, called "ischemic preconditioning," can limit infarct size progression, protect against arrhythmia, and improve myocardial stunning due to ischemia-reperfusion.28 Ischemic preconditioning induces the production of specific metabolites, activating protein kinase C, which activates several cell kinases, such as tyrosine kinase. Furthermore, multiple downstream kinase cascades are activated by exercise and are responsible for cardiac protection.29

2.1.3. Exercise improves cardiac electrical stability

Animal studies have shown that intensive exercise reduces susceptibility to malignant arrhythmia in infarcted hearts. This phenomenon is linked to intrinsic exercise-induced normalization of refractoriness in infarcted hearts.30 Exercise training also induces a shift in autonomic balance toward increased cardiac vagal activity, which has been shown to have an anti-fibrillatory effect.1

2.1.4. Exercise improves myocardial oxygen supply

In a study involving 39 postinfarction subjects using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, an exercise training program was found to increase myocardial perfusion reserve in remote (30%, p < 0.01) and infarcted myocardium (25%, p < 0.05).31 In addition, coronary collateral circulation to diseased vessels was found to be significantly increased in response to exercise.32 In patients with CHD, an exercise training program induced a favorable alteration in the myocardial oxygen consumption indexes at which myocardial ischemia develops.33 Furthermore, exercise-based CR significantly decreased the plaque burden in mildly stenotic lesions of the culprit coronary artery in patients with ASC.34 Exercise-based CR was also shown to decrease ST-segment depression during exercise35 and improve myocardial perfusion measured by thallium-201 scintigraphy.36

2.1.5. Exercise improves endothelial function

Coronary artery disease is associated with impaired endothelial function, especially in young patients with MI.37 In patients with CHD, an exercise training program can improve the endothelial function of large coronary conduits and resistance arteries.38 Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this phenomenon. For example, exercise-induced shear stress has been demonstrated to augment the expression of nitric oxide synthase in the endothelium,39 upregulate levels of cytosolic copper- and zinc-containing superoxide dismutase,40 and suppress the activity of angiotensin-converting enzymes, which are able to break down bradykinin (a functional vasodilator).41

2.2. Psychosocial mechanism

2.2.1. Exercise improves psycho-neurological function

Psychological risk factors increase the risk of CHD and influence long-term outcomes. Recent evidence has shown that exercise-based CR programs can improve psycho-neurological function, reducing all-cause mortality.42 Some evidence demonstrates that exercise has favorable effects on cognitive function, inflammation, platelet activation, and brain plasticity.43-45 Patients with coronary artery disease were found to have a higher concentration of catecholamines as a result of sympathetic system activation.46 Aerobic exercise training can enhance vagal tone, resulting in resting bradycardia, which has a protective effect in patients with CHD.46

2.2.2. Exercise protects against depressive and other psychological disorders

A meta-analysis comprising 11 randomized trials and 771 subjects showed that exercise training may be effective in alleviating anxiety and depression symptoms in patients with CHD.47 A review of Ochsner studies by Lavie et al.48 supported the benefit of exercise training in reducing psychological stress, improving CHD risk factors, and reducing all-cause mortality. Furthermore, Lavie et al.49 showed that exercise training reduced the prevalence of anxiety (Kellner’s anxiety symptoms score > 7) and high anxiety (Kellner’s anxiety symptoms score > 10) by 56% and 69%, respectively. In a study of 522 patients with CHD, exercise training reduced the prevalence of depression from 17% to 6% (-63%, p < 0.001).50 In a trial by Blumenthal et al.,51 patients assigned to the exercise training groups had lower clinical event rates compared with those assigned to the non-exercise group (hazard ratio: 0.44; confidence interval: 0.27-0.71; p < 0.001). Patients who underwent additional stress management treatment demonstrated fewer clinical events compared with the group who underwent exercise training alone (18% vs. 33%; hazard ratio: 0.49; confidence interval: 0.25-0.95; p = 0.04). Therefore, exercise training and stress management treatment produced better psychological functioning than the usual care.

2.2.3. Exercise promotes behavior changes

Patients who have depressive symptoms may not engage in health improvement behaviors, including consuming a balanced diet, smoking cessation, and good drug adherence.52 Multidisciplinary CR programs, including exercise planning, can reduce depressive symptoms, encourage behavior changes, and improve clinical outcomes.53,54

3. TIMING OF CARDIAC REHABILITATION

Early CR is usually safe and effective, although patients with complex hospital cases may have to wait longer before starting a CR program. There is no evidence of increased risk from moderate exercise during the early period after stent implantation.55 Earlier studies recommended daily walking soon after discharge for most patients.17 However, randomized control trials regarding the optimal timing of CR following an AMI were lacking. In addition, there is little evidence to indicate specifically when patients should commence CR to derive the most benefits.55 In a retrospective study,56 investigators collected mortality and hospital readmission data to examine a cohort of patients following MI, MI/percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). The proportion of participants with MI was 58.5% in the CR group and 83.2% in the non-CR group. The CR group demonstrated lower all-cause mortality and decreased hospital readmissions. In addition, early separation of the survival curves of the CR and the non-CR groups revealed long-term benefits of CR.

Furthermore, Dunlay et al.13 showed that in a population-based surveillance study of 2,991 patients with MI, those starting a CR program following hospital discharge had lower all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular readmissions and mortality risk. Similar early separation of curves of the estimated mean number of readmissions over time and the Kaplan-Meier curves of time to death were observed,13 supporting that early CR program entry is safe and results in positive outcomes.13,14 Nakamura et al.57 identified 31,603 adult patients with AMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention on the day of admission and who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for more than three consecutive days between July 2010 and March 2018. Patients who started a rehabilitation program within 3 days of ICU admission were included in the early CR group, while others were included in the usual care group. Although no correlations were observed between early CR and the Barthel activities of daily living index scores, at discharge, early CR was established to be safe and associated with lower hospital costs and shorter hospital stays. Kim et al.58 examined the safety and effectiveness of CR in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest due to AMI; improvement was observed in the patients’ exercise capacity after aerobic exercise throughout the CR program. This study provided evidence that CR is safe for high-risk patients with a history of cardiac arrest. However, in-patient CR may be preferred for some cases of severe left ventricular dysfunction or comorbidities needing 24-hour attention, and early enrollment may have better results on left ventricular remodeling59 and functional outcomes.60

Early CR enrollment improves subsequent attendance and outcomes,61,62 although varying degrees of monitoring or supervision during exercise is needed.63 Lay et al.64 provided objective data on physical activity levels of patients with AMI. Patients, of which 81% could walk independently, spent about half the day being physically inactive, implying that CR in the first week after MI’s optimal timing and dose remained unclear. Exercise for conditioning purposes might not be recommended in high-risk patients with unstable disease; nevertheless, daily activities can be prescribed on the basis of individual assessment.63 The American College of Sports Medicine’s clinical exercise guidelines18 state that submaximal exercise testing may be performed as early as 4-6 days after an AMI and symptom-limited tests at more than 14 days. Inpatient referral is considered a strong predictor of CR enrollment, and a lack of referral in Phase 1 negatively affects enrollment rates.65

Delayed CR significantly impacts fitness outcomes. A study by Fell et al.60 used the United Kingdom National Audit of CR’s data to explore the relationship between the timing of CR and fitness-related outcomes. For every day increase in wait time, patients were 1% less likely to improve across all fitness-related measures. Haykowsky et al.59 conducted a meta-analysis of the effects of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling following MI, and found that every week exercise is delayed requires an additional month of exercise to accomplish the same level of benefit. Therefore, efforts should be made to identify and overcome barriers to timely CR provision.

A systematic review of survivors of AMI reported major depression in 19.8%, and the proportion with significant symptoms varied between 15% and 31% depending on the type of screening instrument used.66 In addition, the CR wait time has been shown to detrimentally affect the outcome of patients’ anxiety and depression status commensurate with the delay. Therefore, CR programs falling outside the 4-week window for commencement following referral must strive to reduce the wait time to avoid negative impacts on patients’ psychological outcomes.67

Borrayo-Sánchez et al.68 reported that early CR following MI, from the first 24-48 hours in the ICU and hospitalization, allowed early discharge, better HRQoL, and fewer disability leave days. Early discharge (within 48-72 hours) is considered appropriate in select low-risk patients only if early CR and adequate follow-up can be arranged,69 and individuals who have experienced an ACS should be referred to an early exercise-based CR program70,71 to initiate Phase 2 CR soon after discharge.71-73

Recommendation 1: All patients admitted with MI should be referred to the rehabilitation department as early as clinically feasible during the ICU stay.

Early entry into a CR program reduces the long-term risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular readmission, and an increase in survival rate following MI. Even if the patient is medically unstable, early referral means that the rehabilitation team is aware of the patient and can start Phase 1 rehabilitation as soon as possible. The timing, phases, and intensity of CR in patients with AMI are summarized in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Timing, phases, and intensity of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

4. ORGANIZATION OF CARDIAC REHABILITATION

The structured exercise-based approach to CR was developed by Hellersten in the 1950s for patients with acute cardiac conditions.74 However, the number of personnel, types of equipment, and facilities vary according to institution’s size, funding, number of CR medical professionals and eligible patients. Therefore, CR programs should be structured according to the organizational environment. The structure of a multidisciplinary CR team, particularly the number of people on the team and the type of healthcare professionals, is directly dependent on the number of patients and the content of the program, the complexity of the cases of the patients being treated, the organization’s human resources policies, and the program’s availability to deliver community resources.

Participation in a medically supervised, structured, comprehensive, multidisciplinary exercise-based CR and prevention program for patients after an AMI is recommended to improve patient outcomes. The CR program should be comprehensive and multidisciplinary,75 including exercise training, diet therapy, and lifestyle intervention, and must consider the facilities’ site-specific equipment and the associated safety requirements and considerations.

Recommendation 2: The multidisciplinary team should consist of cardiologists, physiatrists, physical and occupational therapists, rehabilitation nurses, dieticians, clinical psychologists, medical technologists, case managers, and pharmacists (Figure 3). Certified CR specialists should lead CR programs.76

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation team.

Team members should undergo professional training in CR and the secondary prevention of CVD, and have good communication and coordination skills. This team should conduct a comprehensive assessment for each individual requiring CR. The CR team should formulate personalized rehabilitation prescriptions and comprehensive intervention measures based on their expertise using a multidisciplinary approach. In addition, the team should implement strict quality control of the CR program and an evaluation system to improve it continuously.

The rehabilitation management of CVD emphasizes the entire process and continuity. For patients in the acute stage, CR should be implemented early and promptly by referral to a CR center or clinic for systematic and comprehensive rehabilitation training.77

5. DIET PROGRAM FOR PATIENTS WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

Certain dietary patterns may be related to a decreased risk of CVD, especially after MI. Besides medication treatment, life-style and diet modifications are required to improve the secondary prevention of MI or other related complications. Therefore, choosing "heart-friendly" foods is essential. The dietary principles for coronary artery disease according to recent research are as follows:

5.1. Low-fat diet

The low fat diet, defined as saturated fat ≤ 7% of total daily calories,78 or food fat weight < 50 g/day,79 is known to improved CVD outcomes. Recommendations to reduce saturated fat are largely based on the notion that high levels of intake increases the risk of CVD. However, several studies have suggested that fat reduction could increase the risk of CHD, unless saturated fat is replaced with other fats.80

5.2. Mediterranean diet

The Mediterranean and low-fat diets decrease the risk of CVD.78,81,82 Primary-outcome-free survival (a composite of all-cause and cardiac deaths, MI, hospital admissions for heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, or stroke) did not differ between the low-fat and Mediterranean-style diets.77 However, the Mediterranean diet was found to be superior to the low-fat diet in the secondary prevention of major cardiovascular events. These effects were more evident in men.82 Based on the published results from the Lyon Diet Heart Study and conservative assumptions, the Mediterranean diet is highly cost-effective for persons after a first AMI and represents an exceptional return on investment.81

5.3. Dietary approach to stop hypertension diet

Adherence to the dietary approach to stop hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern has been associated with a substantially lower risk of CAD and stroke mortality in an Asian population.79 In addition, an inverse association between the DASH score and incidence of CAD has been demonstrated among US veterans.83 Furthermore, the DASH dietary pattern is a well-accepted blood pressure-lowering diet associated CVD benefits, supported by reductions in blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other established CVD risk factors in people with and without diabetes.84

5.4. Plant-based food diets

Diets higher in plant and lower in animal foods have been associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population.85 However, a systemic review revealed the favorable role of healthy plant-based foods in reducing cardiovascular mortality and CVD, but not total mortality.85,86

Recommendation 3: The diet program recommendations for patients with CVD are as follows: 1. Follow a low-fat, Mediterranean, DASH, or plant-based diet, which includes foods indicated in Table 1 as frequently as possible; 2. Limit sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats and avoid the foods shown in Table 2; this is especially recommended after experiencing an MI.

Table 1.

Table 1

Table 2. Foods to limit or avoid.

Fried food Cookies and cakes Fast food
Candy Chips Processed frozen meals
Biscuits Ice cream Canned food*
Red meat Hydrogenated vegetable oils Pizza, burgers, and hot dogs

* Veggies and beans are the exceptions, as long as there’s no added salt.

However, diet habits may have other considerations, such as personal preferences (e.g., tradition, culture, religion, or economics), and metabolic goals.87 Different types of heart-friendly foods may be relevant to different evidence-based medicine diet choices. Besides, there is an overlap between food groups in evidence-based medical diet choices: the vegetables, fruits, and fish and seafood have three choice groups involved (Table 1).

In addition, the prevalence of CVD is much higher in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), who may benefit from lifestyle changes, which include adapted diets. Research has investigated the DM diet selection for decreasing the CVD risk. In addition, some heart-friendly foods types may be limited in patients with diabetes mellitus. The food choice must be considered sugar content for patients with type 2 DM (Figure 4).88

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Food choices for patients with diabetes mellitus. DASH, dietary approach to stop hypertension.

In conclusion, benefits from lifestyle changes, which include dietary adaptations, play an essential role in CR. Patients with CVD should be educated about different dietary approaches and the nutrients associated with better and worse outcomes.

6. CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISK MODIFICATION

Major atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) risk factors can be divided into non-modifiable (age, sex, family history of CVD, and ethnicity) and modifiable factors (cigarette smoking, DM, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and adiposity).89 Due to the diversity of patient risk factors, individualized intervention and treatment goals are critical for risk modification. Patient- and family-centered shared decision-making, multidisciplinary teamwork, and an integrated approach are recommended to benefit the process and achieve favorable risk modifications.90 Patients experiencing AMI are usually those with established ASCVD and belong to the very high CVD recurrence risk group, especially if the risk factors are not treated.90

Recommendation 4: A stepwise approach (Figure 5) is recommended to make ultimate patient treatment goals for CVD risk factor modification.90

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Stepwise cardiovascular risk modification. ABCD, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics; ASCVD, atherosclerotic CVD; BP, blood pressure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; GLP1-RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; HbA1C, glycated hemoglobin; HBPM, home blood pressure monitoring; HF, heart failure; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NRT, nicotine-replacement therapy; S-ABCDE, sodium restriction, alcohol limitation, body weight reduction, cigarette smoking cession, diet adaption and exercise adoption; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SGLT2, sodium-glucose transport protein 2.

In the first CR step, smoking cessation, risk factor modification, required individualized treatment (i.e., blood pressure and diabetes control, LDL-C reduction, and antithrombotic therapy), and establishing a healthy lifestyle (e.g., avoiding adiposity and adequate physical activity), are highly recommended for all patients. After the initial management and achievement of treatment goals, individualized treatments based on residual 10-year and lifetime CVD risks, treatment benefits, and patient comorbidities, frailty, and preferences are mandatory to achieve intensified goals in the second step for very high-risk patients.89 Presently, there are no Taiwanese recurrent CVD risk stratification tools for secondary prevention. The Secondary Manifestations of Arterial Disease (SMART) and the European Action of Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Evens (EUROASPEIRE) risk models estimate the 10-year residual CVD risk and 2-year risk of recurrence of CVD in patients with established ASCVD.91,92 The lifetime CVD risk reduction and long-term treatment benefits can also be derived from previous randomized controlled studies or meta-analyses of these studies.93-95 Some online calculators, such as the European Society of Cardiology’s CVD risk app, are available to estimate the lifetime benefit of smoking cessation, lipid reduction, and blood pressure control.96 The estimate and interpretation of CCVD risk can be helpful in communication with patients when proceeding with individualized treatments.

6.1. Smoking cessation

Smoking cessation is the most effective CVD risk modification, significantly reducing the risk of MI and mortality.11,12 Cessation should be encouraged in all smokers, and passive smoking, i.e., second-hand smoking, should be avoided through educating patients. The time of diagnosis or treatment of CVD is a good impetus to start the cessation program. The failure of smoke cessation is common in patients with ASCVD; however, the cessation program still needs to be continuously implemented. Some patients who repeatedly fail to stop smoking may have a mental illness of severe depression or environmental exposure; therefore, mood-management therapies may benefit the success of cessation.97,98 Smokers who quit smoking may gain 5 kg on average, but the health benefits outweigh the drawbacks of weight gain.99 Evidence-based medication, such as nicotine-replacement therapy, bupropion, varenicline, and cytisine, can be considered for smokers ready to quit smoking.100-102

6.2. Blood pressure

All patients with CVD need to be screened for hypertension. The 2022 clinical practice guidelines of hypertension recommend using home blood pressure monitoring and the 722 protocol to obtain a more accurate assessment of the blood-pressure profiles.103 Based on home blood pressure monitoring, the overall blood-pressure target is < 130/80 mm of mercury (mmHg). Patients with established ASCVD or high CV risks are recommended a more intensive systolic blood-pressure target of < 120 mmHg, if tolerable.103,104 Lifestyle modification with sodium restriction, alcohol limitation, body weight reduction, cigarette smoking cession, diet adaption, and exercise adoption (S-ABCDE) and primary antihypertensive agents, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics (ABCD) are recommended as first-line treatments.103 It is advised to begin with combined therapy, ideally in the form of a single-pill, for individuals with blood pressure levels exceeding the target by 20/10 mmHg. Implementing a prioritized approach can enhance hypertension control by first achieving the home blood pressure monitoring goal, then maintaining or reducing the homeostatic model assessment levels, and, if necessary, utilizing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for treatment adjustments. In cases where blood pressure levels have not reached their targets after 4 weeks of therapy, a modification strategy should be promptly employed before adjusting medications. The recommended adjustment approach, referred to as ATGOALs, encompasses the following aspects: adherence, timing of administration, increased dosages, additional drug classes, alternative combinations or single-pill combinations, and lifestyle modifications (along with relevant laboratory tests). In addition, renal denervation could be explored as an alternative method for lowering blood pressure after thorough clinical and imaging assessments.103

6.3. Diabetes mellitus

Screening for DM with the hemoglobin A1c or fasting blood sugar assessment is warranted for patients with ASCVD.105 Lifestyle modifications are suggested, including smoking cessation, a low-saturated fat, high-fiber diet, aerobic physical activity, and weight training.106 A target hemoglobin A1c of < 7.0% is recommended to reduce the recurrent CVD risk and microvascular complications for patients with either type 1 or 2 DM.107,108 Metformin treatment can be initiated for patients with ASCVD and type 2 DM if there are no contraindications.109-111 Despite the clinical benefits of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors,112-115 the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors are preferentially recommended for patients with concurrent ASCVD and DM.116 Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are preferable for patients with ASCVD and DM; however, if these patients develop heart failure, sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors should be prioritized.116

6.4. Lipids

Dyslipidemia can be screened with fasting or non-fasting sampling of lipid parameters, as the samples have the same prognostic values.117,118 Nevertheless, if the patient has metabolic syndrome, DM, and hypertriglyceridemia, the calculated LDL-C from a non-fasting sampling should be interpreted cautiously. The corresponding non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol value (total cholesterol minus high-density lipoprotein) or apolipoprotein B can be alternative treatment goals, particularly in patients with DM or hypertriglyceridemia because the values do not need to consider the triglyceride concentration.119-121 An ultimate LDL-C goal of < 70 mg/dL and an LDL-C reduction of ≥ 50% from baseline is suggested for patients with established ASCVD without DM.90,122 In patients with ASCVD and DM, an LDL-C goal of < 55 mg/dL and LDL-C reduction of ≥ 50% from baseline is recommended.90,122

If tolerable, a maximal dose of high-intensity statin is suggested to achieve the treatment goal for patients with a very high CVD risk, e.g., experiencing ACS.91,122 A statin regimen is also recommended as the first-line treatment for CVD risk reduction for patients with hypertriglyceridemia (200 mg/dL). Combined statin and ezetimibe treatment is suggested if the LDL-C goals are not achieved with statin alone.91,122 For secondary prevention among patients with ASCVD, a combined treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors is recommended if the treatment goal is not achieved with statin alone.91,122

Inclisiran is the first small interfering ribonucleic acid therapy to lower LDL-C with two doses a year. Despite promising trial results, real-world practice and use approval may need more evidence.123,124 The same strategy of lowering lipids is suggested with a statin for young and older patients with ASCVD. Nevertheless, a low dose can be initiated if there is significant renal impairment or the potential for drug interactions.

7. DRUG THERAPY FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Drug therapy for MI involves antithrombotic agents, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers, beta-blockers, and nitrates. In addition, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and lipid- and glucose-lowering agents are essential drugs for special populations.5,125

Recommendation 5: Patient issues that are associated with taking guideline-directed medical therapy should be considered in CR.

Patients taking dual antiplatelet agents should avoid exercise with body collisions, especially when combined with oral anticoagulants, due to the risk of hemorrhaging.126 However, exercise capacity, HR, and blood pressure are not influenced by anti-thrombotic agents.

Patients taking beta-blockers may be unable to exercise up to the anticipated performance and HR. In addition, they may have an attenuated HR response to exercise and an increased or decreased maximal exercise capacity. For patients whose beta-blocker dose was altered after an exercise test or during CR, a new graded exercise test may be helpful.127 Monitoring patients’ signs and symptoms and the Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale are currently the most used in CR. The HR and Borg RPE scale should be defined as patients’ target for exercise intensity.128,129

The evaluation of maximal voluntary effort during exercise testing is often questioned because current equations to predict maximum HR (220 - age) are based on subjects without CHD or beta-blocker therapy. Therefore, maximal HR measurement may be overestimated in patients taking beta-blockers. Data from symptom-limited exercise tests completed on patients with systolic heart failure taking beta-blockers in a controlled trial were used to develop a simplified equation as follows: 119 + 0.5(resting HR) – 0.5(age) – (0, if the test was completed using a treadmill or 5, if a stationary bike was used).128

Based on the Henry Ford Preventive Cardiology Outcomes database for patients with a history of MI or revascularization procedures, a prediction equation was developed as follows: HR maximum = 164 – 0.7 × age, with a standard error of the estimate of 18/min.127 This equation provides a better estimate of the maximum HR for patients with coronary artery disease receiving beta-blockers than previously reported equations.

In addition, patients on diuretic therapy are at a potentially elevated risk for orthostatic hypotension and volume depletion, particularly after rounds of exercise. For these patients, the hemodynamic responses to exercise, including the symptoms of light-headedness, dizziness, and arrhythmias, should be monitored during rehabilitation. Similar conditions should be considered for patients on vasodilator therapy, such as nitrates.19

8. PSYCHOSOCIAL ASSESSMENT AND INTERVENTION

Older patients surviving AMI have measurable cognitive impairment without dementia (CIND). It has been reported that about 25% and 30% of older patients surviving AMI display moderate to severe and mild CIND, respectively, making CIND an important condition to consider when optimizing AMI care.130 In addition, it was found that CIND was clinically insignificant but associated with less invasive care, less referral and participation in CR, and worse risk-adjusted first-year survival rates in patients with moderate to severe CIND.130 Even if not immediately evident to the physician, CIND may impact AMI care, medication adherence, clinical follow-up, and HRQoL.131 Therefore, appropriate mental function assessment and cognitive rehabilitation programs131,132 are necessary to assist patients in preserving their daily life activities.

Stressors and episodes of anger, depression, anxiety, and frustration can trigger the onset of AMI.133,134 The risk of having an AMI is more than 2-fold higher following outbursts of anger compared with other episodes, such as depression and anxiety, and is associated with higher relative risk.135 The psychosocial index incorporating many of these adverse behavioral factors has demonstrated them to be high AMI risk factors.136,137 In addition, adverse psychological risk factors have been associated with several standard CHD risk factors and peripheral vascular disease (PAD).49

Recommendation 6: Clinical psychologists’ evaluation and intervention at the psychological and social level should incorporate individual or group treatments, such as mindfulness promoting, emotional monitoring, executive function, and stress adjustment, such as mindfulness therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, emotion-focused therapy, neuropsychotherapy, etc., to reduce patients’ risk of morbidity.

9. PHASE 1: INPATIENT REHABILITATION

Traditionally known as Phase I CR, inpatient CR is offered during hospitalization and reduces the rate of physical deconditioning following an AMI event.70,138,139 The content of inpatient CR includes adjusting the CVD risk factors, assessing physical activity ability, early mobilization, and education for home-based exercise.

For patients staying in the ICU, rehabilitation aims to prevent the complications of inactivity through conditioning exercises. The rehabilitation program includes self-care activities and breathing, range of motion (ROM), and bed mobility exercises.19 In addition, out-of-bed standing and stepping are recommended for eligible patients to restore ambulation function and prevent falling. Short-distance walking and low-intensity cycling (3-4 metabolic equivalents [METs]) for 5-10 min, 3-4 times/day in the ICU unit are also encouraged.140

Once there is no deterioration of the patient’s cardiac state, they can be transferred to a general ward where CR can be conducted at the bedside or in the rehabilitation unit.

Recommendation 7: The rehabilitation program in the general ward should focus on low-intensity aerobic exercise. The recommended inpatient aerobic exercise prescription is shown in Table 3.19

Table 3. Phase 1 inpatient aerobic exercise recommendation.

Phase 1 aerobic exercise prescription following acute myocardial infarction
Frequency 2-4 times/day
Intensity Target heart rate = resting heart rate + 20 beats/min, with an upper limit of 120 beats/min or Borg rating of perceived exertion scale = 13
Time Beginning with intermittent bouts that last 3-5 min; progress to 10-15 min continuous bouts
Type Walking, ergometer, or treadmill

Flexibility training should be incorporated before and after each session. Stretching helps to lessen the musculoskeletal discomfort brought about by exercise, particularly for patients who previously did not have regular exercise habits. Implementing resistance training during the inpatient phase is discouraged.18,19

The mean hospital stay length of patients with AMI in Taiwan is 9.1 days.141 However, studies have shown that patients with uncomplicated AMI can be safely discharged within 48-72 hours post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention.142,143 The global trend of shortening the length of hospital stay allows minimal time for inpatient CR. Consequently, patient and family education and referral to outpatient CR during Phase 1 is essential. Patients are encouraged to continue exercise after discharge following the inpatient exercise prescription until they receive exercise testing at the outpatient department.19 It is recommended to provide a manual with documented, individualized exercise instructions as a reference on discharge.

10. PHASE 2: OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION

After discharge from the hospital, patients with AMI are encouraged to participate in an outpatient CR program. An exercise training session comprises warm-up, conditioning, and cool-down periods.19 The warm-up period usually consists of 5-10 min, including low-intensity aerobic exercises to speed up circulation, increase muscular blood perfusion and temperature, increase ROM, and prepare patients psychologically for following the conditioning phase training.144

The conditioning period can be divided into aerobic and resistance training. Aerobic training involves rhythmic, alternating activation of large muscle groups.

Recommendation 8: The recommended Phase 2 CR training frequency, intensity, duration, and types of aerobic exercises are outlined in Table 4.19,144

Table 4. Phase 2 outpatient aerobic exercise recommendation.

Phase 2 aerobic exercise prescription following acute myocardial infarction
Frequency 3-5 days/week
Intensity Commencing with 40% exercise capacity and progressing to 80% exercise capacity using HR or VO2 reserve, or VO2max. A Borg rating of perceived exertion scale value of 12-16 is suggested as the training intensity in patients with atrial fibrillation, advanced disease, or who are using beta-blockers. The (HRrest) + 20-30 beats/min or the “talk test” should be used in the absence of exercise testing
Duration Progress from 20-60 min/day. Multiple bouts of 10-min low-intensity activities are recommended for frail or deconditioned patients
Type Treadmill walking, stationary cycling, upper or lower limbs ergometers, as tolerated

HR, heart rate; HRrest, resting heart rate; max, maximal; VO2, oxygen uptake.

High-intensity interval training (HIIT), comprising 3-4 min of very high-intensity exercise interposed with 3 min at a moderate intensity, has been established as an alternative in outpatient CR. Previous studies have revealed that HIIT is not inferior to moderate-intensity continuous training. Concerning the risk of exercise, there is still no consensus for HIIT training in patients with AMI. However, HIIT may be adopted in the maintenance phase of CR, as there are several methods to define the intensity using VO2, HR, and METs.19

Resistance training can increase muscle mass, muscle quality, lean body mass, and improved HRQoL. In addition, it may also improve bone mass and endothelium function.145 Therefore, outpatient resistance exercise should be started at least 6-10 weeks after the date of the MI.

Recommendation 9: The recommended prescription for Phase 2 resistance exercise is shown in Table 5.19,70,145,146

Table 5. Phase 2 outpatient resistance training recommendation.

Phase 2 resistance exercise prescription following acute myocardial infarction
Frequency From two nonconsecutive days/week, progressing to three nonconsecutive days/week
Intensity Starting from 30%-40% one-repetition maximum (1-RM) for upper body and 50%-60% 1-RM for lower body; increase by approximately 5%; 2-5 lb for upper body and 5-10 lb for lower body exercises if patients can comfortably achieve the upper limit of the desired repetition range or 11-13 on the Borg rating of perceived exertion scale
Duration Starting from one and progressing to three sets; 10-15 repetitions of eight to 10 exercises
Mode Body weight, dumbbells, wrist weights, elastic bands, calisthenics, pulley weights, free weights, or weight machines, focusing on major muscle groups

After the condition period, a 5-10 min cool-down period, similar to the warm-up period, should be performed. Cool-down helps the HR and blood pressure to recover to the resting state gradually and decreases the incidence of hypotension, arrhythmia, and possible syncope due to the sudden cessation of exercise.19,144

Flexibility exercises can improve the ROM in major joints and muscle/tendon groups, balance, and postural stability.147 Flexibility exercises can be performed after the cool-down period to the point of mild tightness but not elicit pain, with each static stretching position being held for 10-30 seconds for 2-4 repetitions. All stretching techniques can be performed, including static, dynamic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching.19

All patients should be monitored continuously. If any adverse signs and symptoms occur, such as cold sweating, headache, dizziness, chest discomfort, excessive dyspnea, or near fainting, the exercise should be stopped, and a medical consultation should be advised.19,70

11. PHASE 3: MAINTENANCE

Increasing evidence supports the detrimental effects of physical inactivity and sedentary lifestyles on cardiovascular outcomes, emphasizing the importance of continuing the conditioning program initiated in Phase 2 to gain long-term cardiac benefits.148-151 Phase 3 is the long-term maintenance of physical activity and continued integration of secondary prevention strategies into a patient’s daily lifestyle. This phase involves transitioning from an outpatient to a home exercise program, from a medically supervised to an independent self-monitored program,152 and may occur in patients’ homes, outdoors, gyms, or specialized rehabilitation facilities.153 The time of transition is highly variable and depends on the patient’s clinical condition, risks of exercise, and the National Health Insurance Policy. Before transferring to an unsupervised program, patients should have stable cardiac symptoms and appropriate hemodynamic responses to exercise. The patient should have knowledge of proper exercise principles, be capable of recognizing abnormal symptoms, and be motivated to exercise without supervision.152 Exercise intensity is individualized,153 and the patient can regulate their exercise prescription using their submaximal HR and the Borg RPE scale as instructed by the rehabilitation team.

Recommendation 10: Phase 3 maintenance exercise training should be performed at least three times/week, lasting more than 30 min/session.154 An outpatient follow-up visit with the rehabilitation specialist should be scheduled 6 months after starting the Phase 3 program. In addition, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) should be redone at the follow-up visit to monitor the patient’s progression, make appropriate adjustments to the exercise prescription, and detect possible physiological changes that may have taken place.

12. PRE-EXERCISE EVALUATION AND CARDIOPULMONARY EXERCISE TESTING

Before initiating CR, every patient should receive a comprehensive medical evaluation, physical examination, and exercise testing. The medical evaluation should include assessing the patient’s diagnoses, symptoms, risk factors, surgical history, medication records, physical activity, recreational habits, work type, and psychosocial status. The physical examination should include evaluating the patient’s cognitive function, body composition, balance, lower limb strength, peripheral circulation, comorbid conditions, such as musculoskeletal and neurologic disorders and pulmonary disease, and a standard resting 12-lead electrocardiogram.19 Pre-exercise evaluation, including exercise testing, helps physicians identify the CR risks and organize the patient’s individualized exercise prescription.18,155,156

Recommendation 11: CPET, also known as the VO2 test, and the 6-min walk test (6MWT) should be used in pre-exercise evaluation (Table 6) before commencing CR.

Table 6. Recommendation for pre-exercise evaluation.

Pre-exercise evaluation
Medical evaluation Diagnoses, symptoms, risk factors, surgical history, medication records, physical activity, recreational habits, work type, and psychosocial status
Physical examination Cognitive function, body composition, balance, lower limb strength, peripheral circulation; comorbid conditions, including musculoskeletal and neurologic disorders and pulmonary disease, and a standard resting 12-lead electrocardiogram
Exercise testing Cardiopulmonary exercise testing or the 6-min walk test

12.1. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is the gold standard for assessing functional and exercise capacity before initiating an exercise training program, as it collects gas analysis data and presents the changes during exercise testing. Symptom-limited CPET is conducted before Phase 2 CR.18,156,157 In addition, several exercise testing protocols exist for treadmill and stationary cycle ergometers. Physicians should select an exercise protocol according to the patient’s fitness and underlying disease. For example, if a patient is high risk or has a weight problem, stationary cycle ergometers with a less aggressive protocol are a better choice.158 The symptom-limited exercise testing duration should last 8-12 min.159 Staged protocols with one MET increment of metabolic demand per stage or cycle ergometer ramp protocol with 10 watts/ min intensity increments are appropriate for high-risk patients with a functional capacity of < 7 METs. Protocols with a metabolic demand > 2 METs/stage or an intensity increment of 20 watts/min are appropriate for low- to intermediate-risk patients with a functional capacity > 7 METs.18 The risk can be stratified according to the medical history, symptoms, electrocardiography, and the presence of heart failure.160 The physicians can use the result of CPET to organize the exercise prescription.

12.2. Six-minute walk test in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Even though CPET is considered the gold standard for pre-exercise evaluation, the need for complex equipment and the requirement for expert interpretation make applying it inconvenient, and several studies have revealed low utilization.161,162 The 6MWT is an alternative tool for pre-exercise evaluation. A good correlation between the VO2 peak and 6MWT distance has been found,163 and it is widely accepted as an alternative tool for pre-exercise evaluation. In addition, the 6MWT can be utilized in exercise prescription and follow-up in clinical changes.164

13. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE EXERCISE PRESCRIPTION

13.1. Special considerations for patients with a coronary artery bypass graft

Exercise prescription for patients following CABG surgery is similar to those with MI. It is well documented that physical activities and upper limb exercises reduce patients’ sternal pain after sternotomy and should be encouraged. Patients who have undergone CABG surgery can start CR from 2 weeks after discharge and are initially prescribed lower extremity exercises, such as walking or stationary cycling. Upper extremity exercises for patients following sternotomy are restricted to general mobility and stretching for 6 weeks after the operation.165

The complications after median sternotomy include superficial wound infections, bony nonunion/sternal instability, sternal dehiscence, and mediastinitis. The incidence of postsurgical complications of median sternotomy is reported to be 1%-8%.166 Complication risk factors after median sternotomy includes female gender, DM, obesity, bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting, reoperation procedures, and increased blood product requirements.167 Sternal wound and stability evaluation is recommended at hospital discharge and when initiating the outpatient CR program.166 Ultrasound is a reliable and precise measure of sternal motion after median sternotomy and is useful for patients with known or suspected sternal instability.168 The sternal instability scale was another method to assess the stability of the sternum in patients following median sternotomy and has been demonstrated to have excellent validity and inter- and intra-rater reliability.169

Evidence suggests that less restrictive sternal precautions can facilitate greater movement, activity, and health perception following median sternotomy. Less restrictive sternal precautions focusing on the lever arm portion of the torque equation encourage motion close to the body with short lever arms and within the safe limits of pain and discomfort.167 In addition, it has been demonstrated that a reduced arm force when tasks were performed at a "slow" compared with a typical "self-selected" speed may be a valuable strategy for patients recovering from median sternotomy.170

Pleural and pericardial effusions are common complications after CABG surgery and may occur within the first several weeks after the operation. About one-fifth of cardiac surgery patients have a pericardial effusion on postoperative day 20, with an incidence of cardiac tamponade between 1%-2.6%.171 These conditions are generally related to postoperative inflammation and can be detected during early outpatient CR by evidence of nonspecific symptoms, such as decreasing exercise capacity, chest discomfort, and increasing dyspnea. The new onset of these symptoms after outpatient CR programs should be further evaluated by a physiatrist.

13.2. Special considerations for patients with peripheral vascular disease

Cardiopulmonary exercise test using a treadmill is more common than cycle ergometry in patients with PAD. In addition to the patient’s functional capacity and exercise limitations, the onset of claudication pain and total walking times should be determined.172 Patients should be asked to report the onset of claudication and rate the severity of discomfort at each stage of the treadmill test using claudication pain scales with five category ratings as shown in Table 7.19

Table 7. Claudication pain scale.

Pain scale Verbal descriptor
0 No discomfort
1 Minimal discomfort
2 Moderate pain
3 Intense pain
4 Unbearable pain

A recent study of patients with PAD reported the benefit of high-intensity compared with low-intensity exercise.173 In addition, treadmill training was preferred for intermittent claudication and exercise intolerance improvement in patients with PAD. A high-intensity exercise workload that induces moderate to moderate/severe claudication within 3-5 min is recommended. Therefore, the walking duration should be 5-10 min to reach moderate to moderate/severe claudication, followed by rest until the pain has dissipated (2-5 min).173

14. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS

A major problem for patients with AMI and osteoarthritis (OA) starting a CR program is the belief that exercise, particularly weight-bearing exercise, will exacerbate joint damage and osteoarthritis progression. Therefore, these patients must be reassured that exercise is safe and consistently reported to improve cardiopulmonary fitness and osteoarthritis symptoms. Generally, CR recommendations are consistent with patients with AMI without osteoarthritis. A shared decision-making process should be applied to patients’ exercise prescription, including exercise mode and intensity.174

During OA acute flare-ups, patients should avoid a strenuous exercise program. However, gentle ROM and stretch exercises to keep the joints full ROM are recommended. Adequate warm-up and cool-down periods are essential for minimizing pain. If exercise exacerbates an OA acute flare-up, alternative exercises that work the same muscle groups and energy systems should be considered. Flexibility training is vital to enhance ROM and counteract OA’s adverse effects on joint mobility. Resistance training for patients with AMI and OA may need increased loads at slower rates and smaller increments to minimize localized joint reactions and pain.19

15. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR DECONDITIONING

Decondition is due to detraining, bed rest, casting, using crutches, paralysis, aging, or space flight. Deconditioning, such as bed rest, induces muscle atrophy and weakness and causes bone loss, cardiovascular changes (such as decreased blood and stroke volumes), increased resting HR, and orthostatic intolerance.

Training regimens for a patient with deconditioning should start with extended periods of very low-intensity activity, including high proportions of strength and balance training, in those suffering severe functional incapacitation at the onset. Strength training of the back, lower limbs, and postural muscle groups, such as the back extensors, quadriceps, hip extensors, and ankle plantar flexors, should be included. Seated activities (e.g., cycle ergometer, seated stepping ergometer) may be more effective and safer than those that rely on standing or ambulating. The risk of bone fractures, even after muscle strength has returned to normal, should always be considered.19

16. STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE CARDIAC REHABILITATION PARTICIPATION

Despite numerous studies indicating the benefits of CR, including reduced hospital readmissions, cardiovascular mortality, and improved exercise capacity and HRQoL in patients post-MI,5,175,176 the participation rate of outpatient CR remains low, ranging from 7% to 15% in individual hospital analyses in Taiwan.177,178 Several factors are associated with decreased participation in outpatient CR after AMI.179,180 These include patients’ lack of awareness of the importance of CR, lack of recommendation or endorsement for CR by the primary-care cardiologist or cardiac surgeon, and uncoordinated CR referral processes. Moreover, socioeconomic factors, including financial, transportation, and time issues, may hinder CR participation.

Recommendation 12: Several strategies have been proposed (Figure 6) to overcome the barriers to CR participation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Strategies to improve patient cardiac rehabilitation participation. EMR, electronic medical records.

First, systematic approaches to facilitate inpatient CR referrals are crucial to promote outpatient participation.181,182 These include implementing an automatic electronic medical records-based referral system and a preset opt-out CR option for all eligible patients. Second, the deployment of a case manager or a liaison officer increases CR participation,181-183 by educating the patients about the benefits of outpatient CR and coordinating the referral and enrollment processes for qualifying patients. Third, reducing the time interval between hospital discharge and the first CR clinic appointment helps to increase CR enrollment.181,184 Evidence shows that for every day of delay in the first CR clinic appointment, patients are 1% less likely to participate.184 Fourth, lowering co-payments or other out-of-pocket fees for patients enrolled in outpatient CR is essential.179,181,184

17. CONCLUSION

Cardiac rehabilitation is a multi-disciplinary intervention recommended in international and Taiwanese guidelines for patients with AMI. All patients admitted with AMI should be referred to a rehabilitation center or clinic as early as clinically feasible. The multidisciplinary CR team consists of cardiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, rehabilitation nurses, dieticians, clinical psychologists, medical technologists, case managers, and pharmacists. The CR program is divided into the inpatient, outpatient, and maintenance phases. The exercise prescription is organized according to individual clinical conditions. Several strategies may be helpful to overcome the barriers to CR participation.

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The expert panel considered the American Association of Cardiovascular & Pulmonary Rehabilitation’s guidelines for CR programs and the American College of Sports Medicine’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription in developing the consensus statement.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hull SS, Jr., Vanoli E, Adamson PB, et al. Exercise training confers anticipatory protection from sudden death during acute myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 1994;89:548–552. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.2.548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.O’Connor GT, Buring JE, Yusuf S, et al. An overview of randomized trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1989;80:234–244. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.2.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Oldridge NB, Guyatt GH, Fischer ME, Rimm AA. Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. Combined experience of randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 1988;260:945–950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dibben G, Faulkner J, Oldridge N, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;11:CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Candelaria D, Randall S, Ladak L, Gallagher R. Health-related quality of life and exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in contemporary acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res. 2020;29:579–592. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02338-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rauch B, Davos CH, Doherty P, et al. The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies - The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23:1914–1939. doi: 10.1177/2047487316671181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Salzwedel A, Jensen K, Rauch B, et al. Effectiveness of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients treated according to contemporary evidence based medicine: update of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS-II). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27:1756–1774. doi: 10.1177/2047487320905719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Vries H, Kemps HM, van Engen-Verheul MM, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in a large representative community cohort of Dutch patients. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1519–1528. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hammill BG, Curtis LH, Schulman KA, Whellan DJ. Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and long-term risks of death and myocardial infarction among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Circulation. 2010;121:63–70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shields GE, Wells A, Doherty P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review. Heart. 2018;104:1403–1410. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Verschueren S, Eskes AM, Maaskant JM, et al. The effect of exercise therapy on depressive and anxious symptoms in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2018;105:80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1289–1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dunlay SM, Pack QR, Thomas RJ, et al. Participation in cardiac rehabilitation, readmissions, and death after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2014;127:538–546. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Suaya JA, Stason WB, Ades PA, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in older coronary patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mampuya WM. Cardiac rehabilitation past, present and future: an overview. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2012;2:38–49. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2012.01.02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li YH, Lee CH, Huang WC, et al. 2020 focused update of the 2012 guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2020;36:285–307. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202007_36(4).20200619A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:e139–e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.American Association of Cardiovascular & Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation programs. 2021;1:online resource. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.American College of Sports Medicine. Feito Y, Fountaine C, Roy B. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 2021;1:online resource. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kirolos I, Yakoub D, Pendola F, et al. Cardiac physiology in post myocardial infarction patients: the effect of cardiac rehabilitation programs - a systematic review and update meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:416. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.08.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McCartney N. Role of resistance training in heart disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:S396–S402. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199810001-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mittag O, Schramm S, Bohmen S, et al. Medium-term effects of cardiac rehabilitation in Germany: systematic review and meta-analysis of results from national and international trials. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011;18:587–593. doi: 10.1177/1741826710389530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shephard RJ, Balady GJ. Exercise as cardiovascular therapy. Circulation. 1999;99:963–972. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.7.963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lopes S, Mesquita-Bastos J, Alves AJ, Ribeiro F. Exercise as a tool for hypertension and resistant hypertension management: current insights. Integr Blood Press Control. 2018;11:65–71. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S136028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Engin B, Willis SA, Malaikah S, et al. The effect of exercise training on adipose tissue insulin sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2022;23:e13445. doi: 10.1111/obr.13445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Blair SN. Evidence for success of exercise in weight loss and control. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:702–706. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-7_part_2-199310011-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Calabresi L, Franceschini G. Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase, high-density lipoproteins, and atheroprotection in humans. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2010;20:50–53. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Marongiu E, Crisafulli A. Cardioprotection acquired through exercise: the role of ischemic preconditioning. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2014;10:336–348. doi: 10.2174/1573403X10666140404110229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yamashita N, Baxter GF, Yellon DM. Exercise directly enhances myocardial tolerance to ischaemia-reperfusion injury in the rat through a protein kinase C mediated mechanism. Heart. 2001;85:331–336. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.3.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dor-Haim H, Lotan C, Horowitz M, Swissa M. Intensive exercise training improves cardiac electrical stability in myocardial-infarcted rats. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005989. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lee BC, Chen SY, Hsu HC, et al. Effect of cardiac rehabilitation on myocardial perfusion reserve in postinfarction patients. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1395–1402. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mobius-Winkler S, Uhlemann M, Adams V, et al. Coronary collateral growth induced by physical exercise: results of the impact of intensive exercise training on coronary collateral circulation in patients with stable coronary artery disease (EXCITE) trial. Circulation. 2016;133:1438–1448; discussion 1448. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Laslett LJ, Paumer L, Amsterdam EA. Increase in myocardial oxygen consumption indexes by exercise training at onset of ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1985;71:958–962. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.5.958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kurose S, Iwasaka J, Tsutsumi H, et al. Effect of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on non-culprit mild coronary plaques in the culprit coronary artery of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Heart Vessels. 2016;31:846–854. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0681-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ehsani AA, Heath GW, Hagberg JM, et al. Effects of 12 months of intense exercise training on ischemic ST-segment depression in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1981;64:1116–1124. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.6.1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schuler G, Hambrecht R, Schlierf G, et al. Myocardial perfusion and regression of coronary artery disease in patients on a regimen of intensive physical exercise and low fat diet. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:34–42. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90048-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chen SM, Tsai TH, Hang CL, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in young patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart Vessels. 2011;26:2–9. doi: 10.1007/s00380-010-0017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hambrecht R, Wolf A, Gielen S, et al. Effect of exercise on coronary endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:454–460. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002173420702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Woodman CR, Muller JM, Laughlin MH, Price EM. Induction of nitric oxide synthase mRNA in coronary resistance arteries isolated from exercise-trained pigs. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:H2575–H2579. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1997.273.6.H2575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Inoue N, Ramasamy S, Fukai T, et al. Shear stress modulates expression of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase in human aortic endothelial cells. Circ Res. 1996;79:32–37. doi: 10.1161/01.res.79.1.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rieder MJ, Carmona R, Krieger JE, et al. Suppression of angiotensin-converting enzyme expression and activity by shear stress. Circ Res. 1997;80:312–319. doi: 10.1161/01.res.80.3.312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lavie CJ, Menezes AR, De Schutter A, et al. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training on psychological risk factors and subsequent prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32:S365–S373. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.07.508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Krantz DS, Baum A, Wideman M. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:977–990. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lavie CJ, Church TS, Milani RV, Earnest CP. Impact of physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and exercise training on markers of inflammation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011;31:137–145. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3182122827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mandolesi L, Polverino A, Montuori S, et al. Effects of physical exercise on cognitive functioning and wellbeing: biological and psychological benefits. Front Psychol. 2018;9:509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Carnevali L, Sgoifo A. Vagal modulation of resting heart rate in rats: the role of stress, psychosocial factors, and physical exercise. Front Physiol. 2014;5:118. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang L, Sun Y, Zhan J, et al. Effects of exercise therapy on anxiety and depression in patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of a randomized controlled study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:730155. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.730155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Artham SM, Gilliland Y. Psychological factors and cardiac risk and impact of exercise training programs-a review of ochsner studies. Ochsner J. 2007;7:167–172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lavie CJ, Milani RV. Adverse psychological and coronary risk profiles in young patients with coronary artery disease and benefits of formal cardiac rehabilitation. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1878–1883. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Milani RV, Lavie CJ. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on depression and its associated mortality. Am J Med. 2007;120:799–806. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Blumenthal JA, Sherwood A, Smith PJ, et al. Enhancing cardiac rehabilitation with stress management training: a randomized, clinical efficacy trial. Circulation. 2016;133:1341–1350. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Das S, O’Keefe JH. Behavioral cardiology: recognizing and addressing the profound impact of psychosocial stress on cardiovascular health. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2006;8:111–118. doi: 10.1007/s11883-006-0048-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Scholz U, Knoll N, Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R. Physical activity and depressive symptoms in cardiac rehabilitation: long-term effects of a self-management intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:3109–3120. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wierenga KL, Fresco DM, Alder M, et al. Preliminary efficacy of an emotion regulation intervention on physical activity and depressive and anxious symptoms in individuals in cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022;37:296–305. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dafoe W, Arthur H, Stokes H, et al. Universal access: but when? Treating the right patient at the right time: access to cardiac rehabilitation. Can J Cardiol. 2006;22:905–911. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70309-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Graham HL, Lac A, Lee H, Benton MJ. Predicting long-term mortality, morbidity, and survival outcomes following a cardiac event: a cardiac rehabilitation study. Rehabil Process Outcome. 2019;8:1179572719827610. doi: 10.1177/1179572719827610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nakamura K, Ohbe H, Uda K, et al. Early rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide inpatient database study. J Cardiol. 2021;78:456–462. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kim C, Jung H, Choi HE, Kang SH. Cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014;38:799–804. doi: 10.5535/arm.2014.38.6.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Haykowsky M, Scott J, Esch B, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling following myocardial infarction: start early and go longer for greatest exercise benefits on remodeling. Trials. 2011;12:92. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fell J, Dale V, Doherty P. Does the timing of cardiac rehabilitation impact fitness outcomes? An observational analysis. Open Heart. 2016;3:e000369. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Russell KL, Holloway TM, Brum M, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation wait times: effect on enrollment. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011;31:373–377. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318228a32f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zullo MD, Jackson LW, Whalen CC, Dolansky MA. Evaluation of the recommended core components of cardiac rehabilitation practice: an opportunity for quality improvement. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012;32:32–40. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e31823be0e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fletcher GF, Balady GJ, Amsterdam EA, et al. Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001;104:1694–1740. doi: 10.1161/hc3901.095960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lay S, Bernhardt J, West T, et al. Is early rehabilitation a myth? Physical inactivity in the first week after myocardial infarction and stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1493–1499. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1106598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Simon M, Korn K, Cho L, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation: a class 1 recommendation. Cleve Clin J Med. 2018;85:551–558. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.85a.17037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Thombs BD, Bass EB, Ford DE, et al. Prevalence of depression in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:30–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00269.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sumner J, Bohnke JR, Doherty P. Does service timing matter for psychological outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation? Insights from the National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25:19–28. doi: 10.1177/2047487317740951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Borrayo-Sanchez G, Alcocer-Gamba MA, Araiza-Garaygordobil D, et al. Interinstitutional clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Gac Med Mex. 2020;156:559–569. doi: 10.24875/GMM.M21000455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:119–177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation. 2007;115:2675–2682. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.180945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Piepoli MF, Corra U, Adamopoulos S, et al. Secondary prevention in the clinical management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Core components, standards and outcome measures for referral and delivery: a policy statement from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation. Endorsed by the Committee for Practice Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21:664–681. doi: 10.1177/2047487312449597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Piepoli MF, Corra U, Benzer W, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17:1–17. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283313592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2315–2381. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bethell HJ. Cardiac rehabilitation: from Hellerstein to the millennium. Int J Clin Pract. 2000;54:92–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29:5–115. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Group JCSJW. Guidelines for rehabilitation in patients with cardiovascular disease (JCS 2012). Circ J. 2014;78:2022–2093. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-66-0094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Arena R, Williams M, Forman DE, et al. Increasing referral and participation rates to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: the valuable role of healthcare professionals in the inpatient and home health settings: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:1321–1329. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318246b1e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Tuttle KR, Shuler LA, Packard DP, et al. Comparison of low-fat versus Mediterranean-style dietary intervention after first myocardial infarction (from The Heart Institute of Spokane Diet Intervention and Evaluation Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1523–1530. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Talaei M, Koh WP, Yuan JM, van Dam RM. DASH dietary pattern, mediation by mineral intakes, and the risk of coronary artery disease and stroke mortality. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e011054. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ball K, Hanington E, McAllen P, et al. Low-fat diet in myocardial infarction: a controlled trial. Lancet. 1965;2:501–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Dalziel K, Segal L, de Lorgeril M. A Mediterranean diet is cost-effective in patients with previous myocardial infarction. J Nutr. 2006;136:1879–1885. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.7.1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Delgado-Lista J, Alcala-Diaz JF, Torres-Pena JD, et al. Long-term secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet and a low-fat diet (CORDIOPREV): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2022;399:1876–1885. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00122-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Djousse L, Ho YL, Nguyen XT, et al. DASH score and subsequent risk of coronary artery disease: the findings from million veteran program. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008089. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chiavaroli L, Viguiliouk E, Nishi SK, et al. DASH dietary pattern and cardiometabolic outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Nutrients. 2019;11 doi: 10.3390/nu11020338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kim H, Caulfield LE, Garcia-Larsen V, et al. Plant-based diets are associated with a lower risk of incident cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular disease mortality, and all-cause mortality in a general population of middle-aged adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e012865. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Quek J, Lim G, Lim WH, et al. The association of plant-based diet with cardiovascular disease and mortality: a meta-analysis and systematic review of prospect cohort studies. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:756810. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.756810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Pallazola VA, Davis DM, Whelton SP, et al. A clinician’s guide to healthy eating for cardiovascular disease prevention. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019;3:251–267. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Jimenez-Cortegana C, Iglesias P, Ribalta J, et al. Nutrients and dietary approaches in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease: a narrative review. Nutrients. 2021;13 doi: 10.3390/nu13114150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification. London: NICE guidelines; 2023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3227–3337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kaasenbrood L, Boekholdt SM, van der Graaf Y, et al. Distribution of estimated 10-year risk of recurrent vascular events and residual risk in a secondary prevention population. Circulation. 2016;134:1419–1429. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.De Bacquer D, Ueda P, Reiner Z, et al. Prediction of recurrent event in patients with coronary heart disease: the EUROASPIRE Risk Model. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29:328–339. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Rodbard HW, Visco VE, Andersen H, et al. Treatment intensification with stepwise addition of prandial insulin aspart boluses compared with full basal-bolus therapy (FullSTEP Study): a randomised, treat-to-target clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:30–37. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70090-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Cersosimo E, Johnson EL, Chovanes C, Skolnik N. Initiating therapy in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: combination therapy vs a stepwise approach. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:497–507. doi: 10.1111/dom.13108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Group S.w; Collaboration E.S.C.C.r. SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:2439–2454. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Rossello X, Dorresteijn JA, Janssen A, et al. Risk prediction tools in cardiovascular disease prevention: a report from the ESC Prevention of CVD Programme led by the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) in collaboration with the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26:1534–1544. doi: 10.1177/2047487319846715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Critchley JA, Capewell S. Mortality risk reduction associated with smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;290:86–97. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.1.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Anthonisen NR, Skeans MA, Wise RA, et al. The effects of a smoking cessation intervention on 14.5-year mortality: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:233–239. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-4-200502150-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Hu Y, Zong G, Liu G, et al. Smoking cessation, weight change, type 2 diabetes, and mortality. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:623–632. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hughes JR, Stead LF, Lancaster T. Antidepressants for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007:CD000031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000031.pub3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Cahill K, Lindson-Hawley N, Thomas KH, et al. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016:CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hartmann-Boyce J, Chepkin SC, Ye W, et al. Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD000146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000146.pub5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Wang TD, Chiang CE, Chao TH, et al. 2022 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology and the Taiwan Hypertension Society for the management of hypertension. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2022;38:225–325. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202205_38(3).20220321A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Liao CT, Toh HS, Yang CT, et al. Economic evaluation of new blood pressure target for hypertensive patients in Taiwan according to the 2022 hypertension clinical practice guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology: a simulation modeling study. Hypertens Res. 2023;46:187–199. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-01037-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Sattar N, Preiss D. HbA1c in type 2 diabetes diagnostic criteria: addressing the right questions to move the field forwards. Diabetologia. 2012;55:1564–1567. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2510-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Authors/Task Force M. Ryden L, Grant PJ, et al. ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the Task Force on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3035–3087. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837–853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Group AC, Patel A, MacMahon S, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2560–2572. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kristensen SL, Rorth R, Jhund PS, et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:776–785. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30249-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zelniker TA, Wiviott SD, Raz I, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet. 2019;393:31–39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32590-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, et al. 2019 update to: management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2020;63:221–228. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05039-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1317–1326. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR, et al. Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1327–1335. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Green JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW, et al. Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:232–242. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Rosenstock J, Perkovic V, Johansen OE, et al. Effect of linagliptin vs placebo on major cardiovascular events in adults with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular and renal risk: The CARMELINA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321:69–79. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Chiang CE, Ueng KC, Chao TH, et al. 2021 consensus pathway of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on novel therapy for type 2 diabetes. JACC Asia. 2021;1:129–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Chapman MJ, Ginsberg HN, Amarenco P, et al. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1345–1361. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Cartier LJ, Collins C, Lagace M, Douville P. Comparison of fasting and non-fasting lipid profiles in a large cohort of patients presenting at a community hospital. Clin Biochem. 2018;52:61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Pischon T, Girman CJ, Sacks FM, et al. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in the prediction of coronary heart disease in men. Circulation. 2005;112:3375–3383. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.532499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Boekholdt SM, Arsenault BJ, Mora S, et al. Association of LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels with risk of cardiovascular events among patients treated with statins: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;307:1302–1309. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Sniderman AD, Islam S, Yusuf S, McQueen MJ. Discordance analysis of apolipoprotein B and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol as markers of cardiovascular risk in the INTERHEART study. Atherosclerosis. 2012;225:444–449. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Li YH, Ueng KC, Jeng JS, et al. 2017 Taiwan lipid guidelines for high risk patients. J Formos Med Assoc. 2017;116:217–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Raal FJ, Kallend D, Ray KK, et al. Inclisiran for the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1520–1530. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ray KK, Wright RS, Kallend D, et al. Two phase 3 trials of inclisiran in patients with elevated LDL cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1507–1519. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Li YH, Wang YC, Wang YC, et al. 2018 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology, Taiwan Society of Emergency Medicine and Taiwan Society of Cardiovascular Interventions for the management of non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117:766–790. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Pelliccia A, Sharma S, Gati S, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2021;74:545. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Brawner CA, Ehrman JK, Schairer JR, et al. Predicting maximum heart rate among patients with coronary heart disease receiving beta-adrenergic blockade therapy. Am Heart J. 2004;148:910–914. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Keteyian SJ, Kitzman D, Zannad F, et al. Predicting maximal HR in heart failure patients on beta-blockade therapy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:371–376. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318234316f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Priel E, Wahab M, Mondal T, et al. The impact of beta blockade on the cardio-respiratory system and symptoms during exercise. Curr Res Physiol. 2021;4:235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.crphys.2021.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Gharacholou SM, Reid KJ, Arnold SV, et al. Cognitive impairment and outcomes in older adult survivors of acute myocardial infarction: findings from the translational research investigating underlying disparities in acute myocardial infarction patients’ health status registry. Am Heart J. 2011;162:860–869 e861. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Bahar-Fuchs A, Clare L, Woods B. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013:CD003260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003260.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Bahar-Fuchs A, Martyr A, Goh AM, et al. Cognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3:CD013069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013069.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Mittleman MA, Maclure M, Sherwood JB, et al. Triggering of acute myocardial infarction onset by episodes of anger. Determinants of Myocardial Infarction Onset Study Investigators. Circulation. 1995;92:1720–1725. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.7.1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Mittleman MA, Mostofsky E. Physical, psychological and chemical triggers of acute cardiovascular events: preventive strategies. Circulation. 2011;124:346–354. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.968776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Mostofsky E, Maclure M, Tofler GH, et al. Relation of outbursts of anger and risk of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:343–348. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Rosengren A, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364:953–962. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937–952. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Corbett SJ, Ftouh S, Lewis S, et al. Acute coronary syndromes: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2021;372:m4760. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2017;70:1082. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Schmidt UH, Knecht L, MacIntyre NR. Should early mobilization be routine in mechanically ventilated patients? Respir Care. 2016;61:867–875. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Lin HC, Chen CS, Lee HC, Liu TC. Physician and hospital characteristics related to length of stay for acute myocardial infarction patients: a 3-year population-based analysis. Circ J. 2006;70:679–685. doi: 10.1253/circj.70.679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Noman A, Zaman AG, Schechter C, et al. Early discharge after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013;2:262–269. doi: 10.1177/2048872612475231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Jones DA, Rathod KS, Howard JP, et al. Safety and feasibility of hospital discharge 2 days following primary percutaneous intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Heart. 2012;98:1722–1727. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Fletcher GF, Ades PA, Kligfield P, et al. Exercise standards for testing and training: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128:873–934. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829b5b44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Williams MA, Haskell WL, Ades PA, et al. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation. 2007;116:572–584. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Pollock ML, Franklin BA, Balady GJ, et al. AHA Science Advisory. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: benefits, rationale, safety, and prescription: An advisory from the Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention, Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association; position paper endorsed by the American College of Sports Medicine. Circulation. 2000;101:828–833. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.7.828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Behm DG, Bambury A, Cahill F, Power K. Effect of acute static stretching on force, balance, reaction time, and movement time. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1397–1402. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000135788.23012.5f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Fletcher GF, Landolfo C, Niebauer J, et al. Promoting physical activity and exercise: JACC health promotion series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1622–1639. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Lavie CJ, Arena R, Swift DL, et al. Exercise and the cardiovascular system: clinical science and cardiovascular outcomes. Circ Res. 2015;117:207–219. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.305205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Lavie CJ, Ozemek C, Carbone S, et al. Sedentary behavior, exercise, and cardiovascular health. Circ Res. 2019;124:799–815. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Wisloff U, Lavie CJ. Taking physical activity, exercise, and fitness to a higher level. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;60:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Pescatello LS. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Piotrowicz R, Wolszakiewicz J. Cardiac rehabilitation following myocardial infarction. Cardiol J. 2008;15:481–487. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Smith SC, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update. Circulation. 2011;124:2458–2473. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318235eb4d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Balady GJ, Arena R, Sietsema K, et al. Clinician’s guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122:191–225. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181e52e69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1531–1540. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02164-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Ueng KC, Chiang CE, Chao TH, et al. 2023 guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndrome. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023;39:4–96. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20221103A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Foster C, Pollock ML, Rod JL, et al. Evaluation of functional capacity during exercise radionuclide angiography. Cardiology. 1983;70:85–93. doi: 10.1159/000173574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Arena R, Myers J, Williams MA, et al. Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation. 2007;116:329–343. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.184461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Williams MA. Exercise testing in cardiac rehabilitation. Exercise prescription and beyond. Cardiol Clin. 2001;19:415–431. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8651(05)70226-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Vromen T, Spee RF, Kraal JJ, et al. Exercise training programs in Dutch cardiac rehabilitation centres. Neth Heart J. 2013;21:138–143. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0374-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.O’Neil S, Thomas A, Pettit-Mee R, et al. Exercise prescription techniques in cardiac rehabilitation centers in midwest states. J Clin Exerc Physiol. 2018;7:8–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Porcari JP, Foster C, Cress ML, et al. Prediction of exercise capacity and training prescription from the 6-minute walk test and rating of perceived exertion. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2021;6 doi: 10.3390/jfmk6020052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Dolecinska D, Przywarska I, Podgorski T, et al. Use of the six-minute walk test in exercise prescription in male patients after coronary artery bypass surgery. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2020;17:183–188. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2020.102340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Pack QR, Dudycha KJ, Roschen KP, et al. Safety of early enrollment into outpatient cardiac rehabilitation after open heart surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:548–552. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.11.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Balachandran S, Lee A, Denehy L, et al. Risk factors for sternal complications after cardiac operations: a systematic review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:2109–2117. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.El-Ansary D, LaPier TK, Adams J, et al. An evidence-based perspective on movement and activity following median sternotomy. Phys Ther. 2019;99:1587–1601. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Balachandran S, Sorohan M, Denehy L, et al. Is ultrasound a reliable and precise measure of sternal micromotion in acute patients after cardiac surgery? Int J Ther Rehabil. 2017;24:62–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Doa El-Ansary GW, Denehy L, McManus M, et al. Physical assessment of sternal stability following a median sternotomy for cardiac surgery: validity and reliability of the sternal instability scale (SIS). Int J Ther Rehabil. 2018;4:140. [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Swanson LB, LaPier TK. Upper extremity forces generated during activities of daily living: implications for patients following sternotomy. J Acute Care Phys Ther. 2014;5:70–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Alraies MC, AlJaroudi W, Shabrang C, et al. Clinical features associated with adverse events in patients with post-pericardiotomy syndrome following cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:1426–1430. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Lee JK, Hsieh IC, Su CH, et al. Referral, diagnosis, and pharmacological management of peripheral artery disease: perspectives from Taiwan. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023;39:97–108. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20220815A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.McDermott MM, Spring B, Tian L, et al. Effect of low-intensity vs high-intensity home-based walking exercise on walk distance in patients with peripheral artery disease: The LITE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021;325:1266–1276. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.2536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Bennell KL, Hinman RS. A review of the clinical evidence for exercise in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14:4–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Hou WH, Lai CH, Jeng C, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation prevents recurrent revascularization in patients with coronary heart disease: a population-based cohort study in TAIWAN. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2016;36:250–257. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Janssen V, De Gucht V, Dusseldorp E, Maes S. Lifestyle modification programmes for patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20:620–640. doi: 10.1177/2047487312462824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Lin YY, Lee CM, Lan C, et al. Phase I cardiac rehabilitation among patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Taiwan J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;40:25–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Hung YY, Hung SY, Chou CL, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation among patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving percutaneous coronary intervention after acute myocardial infarction indicator was activated. Taiwan J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;42:153–160. [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Kim C, Sung J, Han JY, et al. Current status of cardiac rehabilitation in the regional cardiocerebrovascular centers in Korea. J Clin Med. 2021;10 doi: 10.3390/jcm10215079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Ozemek C, Squires RW. Enrollment and adherence to early outpatient and maintenance cardiac rehabilitation programs. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2021;41:367–374. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Ades PA, Keteyian SJ, Wright JS, et al. Increasing cardiac rehabilitation participation from 20% to 70%: a road map from the million hearts cardiac rehabilitation collaborative. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:234–242. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Grace SL, Russell KL, Reid RD, et al. Effect of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on utilization rates: a prospective, controlled study. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:235–241. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Cardiac Rehabilitation Change Package. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Pack QR, Mansour M, Barboza JS, et al. An early appointment to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation at hospital discharge improves attendance at orientation: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. Circulation. 2013;127:349–355. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.121996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Cardiologica Sinica are provided here courtesy of Taiwan Society of Cardiology

RESOURCES