Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1985 Jun;78(2):347–356. doi: 10.1104/pp.78.2.347

Cell Wall Yield Properties of Growing Tissue 1

Evaluation by in Vivo Stress Relaxation

Daniel J Cosgrove 1,2
PMCID: PMC1064733  PMID: 16664243

Abstract

Growing pea stem tissue, when isolated from an external supply of water, undegoes stress relaxation because of continued loosening of the cell wall. A theoretical analysis is presented to show that such stress relaxation should result in an exponential decrease in turgor pressure down to the yield threshold (Y), with a rate constant given by φε where φ is the metabolically maintained irreversible extensibility of the cell wall and ε is the volumetric elastic modulus of the cell. This theory represents a new method to determine φ in growing tissues.

Stress relaxation was measured in pea (Pisum sativus L.) stem segments using the pressure microprobe technique. From the rate of stress relaxation, φ of segments pretreated with water was calculated to be 0.08 per megapascal per hour while that of auxin-pretreated tissue was 0.24 per megapascal per hour. These values agreed closely with estimates of φ made by a steady-state technique. The yield threshold (0.29 megapascal) was not affected by auxin. Technical difficulties with measuring φ by stress relaxation may arise due to an internal water reserve or due to changes in φ subsequent to excision. These difficulties are discussed and evaluated.

A theoretical analysis is also presented to show that the tissue hydraulic conductance may be estimated from the T½ of tissue swelling. Experimentally, pea stems had a swelling T½ of 2.0 minutes, corresponding to a relative hydraulic conductance of about 2.0 per megapascal per hour. This value is at least 8 times larger than φ. From these data and from computer modeling, it appears that the radial gradient in water potential which sustains water uptake in growing pea segments is small (0.04 megapascal). This means that hydraulic conductance does not substantially restrict growth. The results also demonstrate that the stimulation of growth by auxin can be entirely accounted for by the change in φ.

Full text

PDF
347

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyer J. S. Relationship of water potential to growth of leaves. Plant Physiol. 1968 Jul;43(7):1056–1062. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.7.1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cavalieri A. J., Boyer J. S. Water potentials induced by growth in soybean hypocotyls. Plant Physiol. 1982 Feb;69(2):492–496. doi: 10.1104/pp.69.2.492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cleland R. E. The control of cell enlargement. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1977;31:101–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cleland R. The mechanical behavior of isolated Avena coleoptile walls subjected to constant stress: properties and relation to cell elongation. Plant Physiol. 1971 Jun;47(6):805–811. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.6.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cosgrove D. J. Analysis of the dynamic and steady-state responses of growth rate and turgor pressure to changes in cell parameters. Plant Physiol. 1981 Dec;68(6):1439–1446. doi: 10.1104/pp.68.6.1439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cosgrove D. J., Cleland R. E. Osmotic properties of pea internodes in relation to growth and auxin action. Plant Physiol. 1983 Jun;72(2):332–338. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.2.332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cosgrove D. J., Cleland R. E. Solutes in the free space of growing stem tissues. Plant Physiol. 1983 Jun;72(2):326–331. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.2.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cosgrove D. J., Van Volkenburgh E., Cleland R. E. Stress relaxation of cell walls and the yield threshold for growth: demonstration and measurement by micro-pressure probe and psychrometer techniques. Planta. 1984;162(1):46–54. doi: 10.1007/BF00397420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fujihara S., Yamamoto R., Masuda Y. Viscoelastic properties of plant cell walls--I. Mathematical formulation for stress relaxation with consideration for pre-extension rate. Biorheology. 1978;15(2):63–75. doi: 10.3233/bir-1978-15201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Green P. B., Cummins W. R. Growth rate and turgor pressure: auxin effect studies with an automated apparatus for single coleoptiles. Plant Physiol. 1974 Dec;54(6):863–869. doi: 10.1104/pp.54.6.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hüsken D., Steudle E., Zimmermann U. Pressure probe technique for measuring water relations of cells in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1978 Feb;61(2):158–163. doi: 10.1104/pp.61.2.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lockhart J. A. An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation. J Theor Biol. 1965 Mar;8(2):264–275. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(65)90077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Michelena V. A., Boyer J. S. Complete turgor maintenance at low water potentials in the elongating region of maize leaves. Plant Physiol. 1982 May;69(5):1145–1149. doi: 10.1104/pp.69.5.1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Molz F. J. Growth-induced Water Potentials in Plant Cells and Tissues. Plant Physiol. 1978 Sep;62(3):423–429. doi: 10.1104/pp.62.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Métraux J. P., Richmond P. A., Taiz L. Control of Cell Elongation in Nitella by Endogenous Cell Wall pH Gradients: MULTIAXIAL EXTENSIBILITY AND GROWTH STUDIES. Plant Physiol. 1980 Feb;65(2):204–210. doi: 10.1104/pp.65.2.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Philip J. R. Osmosis and Diffusion in Tissue: Half-times and Internal Gradients. Plant Physiol. 1958 Jul;33(4):275–278. doi: 10.1104/pp.33.4.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES