Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2023 Nov 1;24(21):15883. doi: 10.3390/ijms242115883

Aberrant Activation of Immune and Non-Immune Cells Contributes to Joint Inflammation and Bone Degradation in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Kutty Selva Nandakumar 1,2,*, Qinghua Fang 3, Isabella Wingbro Ågren 2, Zoe Fuwen Bejmo 2
Editor: Antonella Fioravanti
PMCID: PMC10648236  PMID: 37958864

Abstract

Abnormal activation of multiple immune and non-immune cells and proinflammatory factors mediate the development of joint inflammation in genetically susceptible individuals. Although specific environmental factors like smoking and infections are associated with disease pathogenesis, until now, we did not know the autoantigens and arthritogenic factors that trigger the initiation of the clinical disease. Autoantibodies recognizing specific post-translationally modified and unmodified antigens are generated and in circulation before the onset of the joint disease, and could serve as diagnostic and prognostic markers. The characteristic features of autoantibodies change regarding sub-class, affinity, glycosylation pattern, and epitope spreading before the disease onset. Some of these antibodies were proven to be pathogenic using animal and cell-culture models. However, not all of them can induce disease in animals. This review discusses the aberrant activation of major immune and non-immune cells contributing to joint inflammation. Recent studies explored the protective effects of extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stem cells and bacteria on joints by targeting specific cells and pathways. Current therapeutics in clinics target cells and inflammatory pathways to attenuate joint inflammation and protect the cartilage and bones from degradation, but none cure the disease. Hence, more basic research is needed to investigate the triggers and mechanisms involved in initiating the disease and relapses to prevent chronic inflammation from damaging joint architecture.

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, inflammation, T cells, B cells, macrophages, fibroblasts, osteoclasts, autoantibodies

1. Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects 0.5–1% of the population worldwide, in a female/male ratio of 3:1, and is most common among those aged 40–70. RA is primarily associated with inflammation within synovial joints. All peripheral joints can be affected in RA, but the most affected are those of the hands, feet, and knees [1]. Although RA’s etiology is still unknown, several factors contributing to RA have been identified. Among them are the susceptibility genes, disease-causing immune cells, and cytokine and signal transduction networks that promote inflammation (Figure 1). Various therapeutic strategies have been developed to target these factors, including TNF-α neutralizing agents, anti-IL-6, and B-cell-depleting antibodies [2]. Although none of these therapeutic strategies can cure the disease, some have proven more effective than others in ameliorating joint inflammation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Various stages of RA development. Multiple factors involved in different (1) pre-arthritis, (2) loss of tolerance to self-antigens, (3) asymptomatic synovitis, (4) symptomatic clinical arthritis, and (5) established arthritis] phases of RA pathogenesis are depicted. Modified from [3].

2. Pathogenesis and Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis

RA is a systemic, chronic, autoimmune disease categorized by synovial inflammation due to the infiltration of T cells, B cells, neutrophils, and macrophages, destroying articular joints and bone architecture. However, RA is not a homogenous disease but instead a syndrome of several sub-phenotypes. RA occurs when the body’s immune system attacks its proteins, so-called self-antigens. The pathogenesis behind RA is a combination of epigenetic, environmental, and genetic factors. Environmental factors contributing to immune system activation and inflammation in RA include smoking, microorganisms, and pollution. When these factors encounter mucous membranes, they can cause local inflammation and epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation and acetylation [3]. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins could also occur due to environmental factors, which change a protein’s function and structure. For example, citrullination of proteins changes the protein’s structure, function, and interactions with the immune cells. Arthritis in the joint involves a multicellular inflammatory process involving infiltration of lymphocytes and granulocytes into the articular cartilage, proliferation of synovial fibroblasts and macrophages, and neovascularization of the synovial lining surrounding the joints. This proliferative process induces swelling, erythema, and pain in multiple joints, leading to destruction and loss of bone density and architecture.

Our body initiates the joint-specific attack by producing autoantibodies [4,5] because of aberrant activation of the B cells recognizing either a self- or cross-reactive antigen. The antibodies, after binding to the joint-specific antigens like collagen type II, present abundantly in the articular cartilage, and other cartilage matrix proteins (cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, collagen type XI) deposited on the cartilage surface could activate the complement system and attract phagocytes to the inflammation site. Active immunization of mice with these cartilage matrix proteins or passive transfer of antibodies specific to them induced arthritis. In addition, serum from K/BxN mice containing anti-glucose-6 phosphatase isomerase (GPI) also induced arthritis in mice due to the binding of these antibodies to GPI deposited on the cartilage surface. Because of the increased immune attack on the joints by the effector cells, there can be a great deal of damage to the articular joints by further activating the complement system through three different pathways (classical, alternative, and lectin pathways) involving several proteases [6]. Mainly, the alternative pathway is involved in activating the terminal pathway. Thus, therapeutic efforts in RA might be improved if the treatment includes its inhibition [7] and the Fc-gamma (FcγRs)-bearing immune effector cells [8,9], like macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils, and others. This makes an early diagnosis more crucial for providing optimal therapy [4]. Relative contributions of complement and FcR-mediated inflammatory pathways to the antigen–antibody complex-dependent inflammatory responses could vary depending on many factors. These include antibody isotype and titer and the site of immune complex deposition. Concerning the Ig isotype, FcγR mechanisms could predominate with immune complexes comprised of non-complement-fixing antibodies or deposit in the locations with abundant resident FcγR-bearing inflammatory cells. Conversely, complement-driven inflammation may dominate when FcγR poorly binds immune complexes containing Ig-constant regions or when leukocytes must be attracted to an inflammatory site.

Many disease-specific autoantibodies are present in different autoimmune diseases. In arthritis, autoantibodies target antigens with a variety of post-translational modifications like citrullination, carbamylation (a non-enzymatic, post-translational modification binding to isocyanic acid), and acetylation [10]. Citrullination might be a prerequisite for triggering the generation of ACPAs in susceptible RA patients [11,12,13]. Citrullinated autoantigens, abundant in RA synovial tissue, play a central role in the disease process. These are altered forms of proteins that arise due to post-translational modification involving the conversion of arginine to citrulline [14]. The citrullinated autoantigens can be recognized by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) like macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells and present the antigen on their cell surface in conjunction with the HLA and travel to the draining lymph nodes where the APCs activate the T cells. Activation of self-reactive T cells triggers a cascade of immune events that contribute to the chronic inflammation and tissue damage observed in RA [15], which includes signaling molecules and cytokines like IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13, stimulating B cells to differentiate into plasma cells to secrete autoantibodies.

ACPA targets are present in the synovium and synovial fluid [16], cartilage [17], lungs [18], and inflammatory cells like neutrophils and macrophages [19,20]. The development of autoantibody characteristics like the use of different isotypes, recognition of specific epitope(s), antibody avidity [21], and affinity, as well as the glycosylation status, reveal their relationship to RA risk factors and clinical phenotypes [10]. The HLA-DRB1 shared epitope, PTPN22, and smoking are associated with specific ACPA reactivities rather than anti-CCP levels [22]. A combination of smoking and HLA-SE alleles is significantly related to the development of some of the ACPA specificities closer to the onset of clinical symptoms, and these associations remained significant at diagnosis [23].

Interestingly, ACPAs can be detected years before the disease onset in a subgroup of patients, and at the onset of clinical symptoms, a broad isotype spectrum is observed [24,25]. Epitope spreading with increased recognition of citrullinated antigens occurs before the onset of RA [26]. An association of valine and leucine at HLA-DRB1 position 11 with radiographic progression in RA was reported to be independent of the shared epitope alleles but not ACPAs [27].

Similarly, RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand) concentrations are increased several years before the onset of arthritis symptoms, particularly in ACPA/RF/anti-CarP-positive individuals, all detectable earlier than RANKL. Positivity for RANKL and anti-CarP antibodies yielded the highest Larsen score in disease onset [28]. Combinations of IgM and IgA isotypes with ACPA specificities, including α-enolase (CEP-1), fibrinogen (Fib)β36-52, Fibα580-600, filaggrin (CCP-1), and anti-CCP2 antibodies, are associated with a shorter time to onset of clinical symptoms [29]. ACPAs are modified both in the constant and variable domains by the presence of N-linked glycans.

Recently, the presence of citrullinated autoantigens in platelets and the platelet-derived microparticles (PDPs) are identified as the potential targets of ACPAs in RA. Citrullinated forms of thrombospondin-1, β-actin, and platelet factor-4 (also known as CXCL4) are highly immunogenic and recognized by ACPAs [30]. ACPAs are associated with a more destructive disease phenotype, although their functional role might be pathogenic and protective depending on their specificity [31]. Previously, anti-citrullinated vimentin antibodies were shown to induce osteoclastogenesis and bone loss [32]. ACPAs can be of great help in identifying the disease activity in the early development of arthritis to treat the patients at an optimal period to prevent a more relapsing and chronic disease pattern, as observed in collagen-induced arthritis, a classical animal model of RA, with the development of epitope-specific, anti-collagen type II (CII) antibodies [33]. We have shown that autoantibodies specific to the CII triple-helical epitope bind and destabilize the cartilage independent of inflammation by an impairment of matrix synthesis on chondrocyte cultures with adverse effects on preformed cartilage and a significant proteoglycan depletion even in the absence of complement factor C5 [34]. Autoantibodies form immune complexes in the joints that attract immune effector cells [35], which initiate cytokine release and prolongs B cell survival pathways. Notably, the increased serum concentration of RF indicates a more aggressive articular disease and RF levels can help diagnose different subtypes of RA [4].

Glycosylation is a post-translational modification that affects most of the antibody’s mediated functions. FcγRs and complement binding to differentially glycosylated antibodies have altered functions like cellular cytotoxicity, phagocytosis, and cytokine secretion. Current studies illustrate that appropriate modification of Fc glycosylation of antibodies could attenuate the effector phase of arthritis and potentially be a future treatment option. In this context, we have identified the importance of IgG Fc-glycosylation in arthritis. Streptococcal Endo-β- N-Acetylglucosaminidase (EndoS) secreted by Streptococcus pyogenes, which hydrolyses the β-1,4-di-N-acetylchitobiose core of the N-linked complex type glycan on the asparagine 297 of the γ-chains of IgG, induced suppression of local immune-complex-mediated arthritis. EndoS disturbed more extensive immune complex lattice formation on the surface of joints, as visualized using anti-C3c staining. Neither complement binding nor antigen–antibody binding per se was affected by the removal of IgG N-glycans by EndoS [36], and this enzyme treatment abolished the arthritogenicity of autoantibodies [37].

The IgG Fc part acts as a bridge between the innate and adaptive immune responses. It is regulated by N-glycosylation present in the variable structures, including agalactosylated and galactosylated forms, which are further modified by fucosylation and bisecting N-acetylglucosamine moieties. The bisecting proinflammatory N-acetylglucosamine moiety G0F was shown to be differentially regulated by estrogen via IgG glycosylation [38]. Similarly, phytoestrogens were found to protect the joints in experimental arthritis by increasing IgG glycosylation and reducing osteoclast activation [39]. The IL-23/TH17 axis could be a decisive factor in controlling the intrinsic inflammatory activities of autoantibodies, which trigger the clinical onset of arthritis [40].

3. Activation of Immune Cells in RA

Several immune cells (T cells, B cells, monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils, etc.) in the synovium and circulation contribute to disease pathogenesis in RA. Infiltration of T and B cells in the inflamed joints and the observed association of specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles suggest the importance of adaptive immunity in RA development [41]. DR genes, including DR4 and DR1 (for example, DRB*0401, DRB*0404, and DRB*0101), are associated with RA. The susceptibility epitope is glutamine–leucine–arginine–alanine–alanine or QRRAA, the shared epitope. T cells, by secreting proinflammatory cytokines, activate the non-immune cells like synovial fibroblasts (type A synoviocytes) and macrophages (type B synoviocytes) into a more aggressive phenotype, causing “pannus” formation and promoting further secretion of cytokines and chemokines leading to joint inflammation. Whereas B cells, apart from activating T cells and secreting proinflammatory cytokines, differentiate into plasma cells that secrete different types of antibody-recognizing self-antigens such as rheumatoid factors, anticitrullinated protein/peptide antibodies, anti-glucose-6-phosphate isomerase antibodies, anti-CII-specific antibodies, and so on. It is well established that some of these autoantibodies are used as diagnostic markers, and their pathogenic nature was also proved using animal models [42,43]. As described earlier, RA is a disease with a complex pathogenesis dependent on several environmental, epigenetic, and genetic factors. Although several tolerance mechanisms at T and B cell levels can limit autoimmune responses, the breakdown of such mechanisms results in autoimmune diseases. However, using anti-inflammatory extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stem cells at the T and B cell levels [44] provides a more promising approach to control inflammation in RA.

3.1. B Cells

The contribution of B cells to RA development is both antibody-dependent and independent. Rheumatoid factors (RF), comprising IgM, IgG, and IgA class antibodies recognizing the Fc part of the IgG antibodies (though not specific for RA), anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPAs, highly specific for RA) [45,46], and anti-CarP antibodies binding to carbamylated antigens [47] and other autoantibodies, are present in the sera and synovial fluids of RA patients. Similarly, antibodies to other post-translationally modified peptides/proteins like malondialdehyde (MDA)–acetaldehyde (MAA)–lysine, and acetylated proteins are primarily present in ACPA-positive RA patients. Some of these antibodies, like RF [48], anti-CarP [47,49], and ACPAs [24,25], are produced and in circulation before the onset of clinical disease [50]. High serum levels of RF can predict a more severe form of the joint disease [51]. Notably, the specificity of ACPA positivity has high sensitivity (60–78%) and specificity (86–99%) values [52,53]. ACPAs are strongly linked to the HLA class II locus, suggesting their involvement in RA development [54]. During citrullination, peptidyl arginine is converted to citrulline by the Ca2+-dependent enzyme peptidyl arginine deiminase (PAD). Various forms of PADs were reported that differ in their location and functional activities. PAD2 and PAD4 play a critical role in RA development by generating citrullinated antigens and contributing to neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation by citrullinating nuclear proteins [55,56].

Defects in the B cell tolerance mechanisms allow increased levels of autoreactive B cells, possibly contributing to disease development in the RA [57]. Many tolerance mechanisms operate at the B cell level to prevent autoimmunity [58]. At the central level, self-reactive B cells are eliminated via clonal deletion [59,60], receptor editing [61,62], and clonal anergy [63] mechanisms. As reported earlier, B cells that escape tolerance induction can undergo somatic mutation and affinity maturation in the periphery, causing pathogenicity [64] by generating autoantibodies. Using RF transgenic mice, Hannum et al. [65] have shown that autoreactive B cells induced normal immune responses and were not anergic.

Similarly, using a germline-encoded CII IgH transgenic mouse model, autoreactive B cells to CII were found to be neither negatively selected nor tolerized but spontaneously produced autoantibodies without any disease development [66]. However, introducing a gene mutation causing reactive oxygen species deficiency led to disease development with an increased germinal center (GC) formation, T cell response, and epitope spreading [67]. Later, GC formation and anti-CII antibody production were identified as the primary pathogenic functions of B cells in the collage-induced arthritis model [68]. These studies suggest the presence of similar pathogenic B cells in humans, which, along with autoreactive T cells, when activated under specific conditions, could contribute to disease development. Kristyanto et al. have shown that sustained activation of expanding memory self-reactive B cells promoted inflammation in RA [69].

Moreover, autoreactive B cells can also present antigens by expressing co-stimulatory molecules to stimulate T cell maturation and differentiation [70] and contribute to synthesizing not only proinflammatory [71] but also regulatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-7, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-10, IL-12, and TGF-β which can be involved in immune responses [72]. By regulating T cells, B cells can modulate the activity and differentiation of these cells. When B cells present autoantigens to T-helper cells, this interaction can activate self-reactive T cells, ultimately influencing the immune responses. Activation of self-reactive T cells produces signaling molecules, including cytokines like IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13, that stimulate B cells to differentiate into plasma cells to secrete autoantibodies causing damage to bone and cartilage. In this context, more autoreactive B cells were reported earlier in RA patients due to a compromise in early B cell tolerance mechanisms [57]. Of note, B1a cells secrete natural autoantibodies without external antigen stimulation. These act as scavengers and help to remove autoantigens and apoptotic cells. However, B1a cells were shown to be pathogenic in the CIA mouse model [73].

Interestingly, biased V-region gene usage and conserved junction arrangements in B cell receptors from RA were reported, suggesting broad ACPA specificities found in RA were from a restricted repertoire of citrulline-specific polyreactive B cell lineages [74]. ACPAs from an individual RA patient can recognize different citrullinated antigens [75,76]. Human filaggrin, α-enolase, fibrinogen, fibronectin, vimentin, collagen II, immunoglobulin-binding protein (BiP), and histone proteins are some of the citrullinated targets for autoantibodies from RA patients [12,52,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83]. Significant epitope spreading of ACPAs before the onset of joint inflammation is well documented [26,84,85,86,87]. These autoantibodies form immune complexes, attracting immune effector cells and activating complement cascades [35]. In this context, ACPAs were known to activate the complement and Fcγ-receptor-bearing immune cells [88]. However, not all the ACPAs are pathogenic [89].

Depletion of B cells using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (rituximab), possibly through complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), proved to be effective in a subset of RA patients [90,91]. However, autoantibody levels were not significantly reduced [92], suggesting antibody-independent functions of B cells in RA-like antigen-presentation to T cells [93], secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, regulation of the functions of T cells [94], facilitation of lymphoid tissue organization during synovitis [95], and the activation of osteoclasts by secreting receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand [96] also contribute to disease development. A comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of citrulline-specific B cells from RA patients showed a differential expression of the IL15 receptor alpha gene and other genes related to protein citrullination and cyclic AMP signaling [97]. In addition, these cells produced amphiregulin, which is involved in an increased migration and proliferation of synovial fibroblasts. Together with ACPA antibodies, they induced the differentiation of osteoclasts [97]. Approximately 5% of sub-lining synovial cells are B cells, which undergo clonal expansion in the joints during RA development, suggesting antigen-driven maturation processes. Autoantibody production occurs in the joints of many RA patients, which can contribute to joint pathology in situ by activating the complement system, producing the anaphylatoxins (C3a and C5a) and attracting FcγR-expressing immune cells like macrophages and neutrophils secreting various proteases, radicals, and proinflammatory factors. In addition, memory B cells from RA patients’ blood and synovial fluid tissues showed an increased RANKL production, which could contribute to enhanced osteoclast activation [96] and joint destruction.

3.2. T Cells

Several pieces of evidence point to the crucial contribution of T cells in RA pathogenesis. The most vital genetic link to RA is the HLA class II involved in antigen presentation to T cells [98,99,100]. Moreover, RA-associated allelic variants of several genes like protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22 (PTPN22), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4), the zeta chain of T cell receptor-associated protein kinase 70 (ZAP70), and peptidyl arginine deiminase 4 (PADI4) encode molecules involved in the T cell activation pathways. CD4+ T cells are among the infiltrating inflammatory cells in the synovial tissue and promote activation of the resident synovial cells (fibroblasts and macrophages) by secreting proinflammatory cytokines. Strong evidence for T cell involvement in disease development has emerged from the analysis of RA synovial biopsies [101]. A study of synovial tissues from ACPA-positive patients showed an elevated level of infiltrating lymphocytes associated with ectopic GC formation [102].

Expression of specific transcription factors stimulated by various cytokines determines the differentiation of Th cells into different subsets (T-bet for Th1 [103]; GATA3 for Th2 [104]; RORγt for Th17 [105]; and BCL6 for T follicular helper cells [106,107,108]). Therefore, these transcription factors could very well be contributing to RA pathogenesis. FoxP3 is crucial for the differentiation and function of Treg cells, which control aberrant activation of T cells; depletion of Treg cells promotes systemic autoimmunity [109]. Notably, a balance between these T cell subsets is critical for the homeostasis of immune functions, and disturbance to this balance was found in RA [110]. A specific deficiency of CTLA-4 in Tregs results in severe autoimmune responses in mice [111]. B-cell-induced LAG3(+)FOXP3(−) regulatory T cells alleviated joint inflammation in collagen-induced arthritis [112]. Using a combined analysis of gene expression and methylation profiling microarray in immune cells of RA, in CD4+ T cells, we identified exceptionally methylated, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) enriched in the processes of formation of new blood vessels, transcription of genes, transport of molecules, and cell shape regulation. Further, our study suggests that the MAPK signaling pathway could differentiate the mechanisms affecting T and B cells in RA (Figure 2) [113]. Therefore, MAPK phosphatases could be novel targets for attenuating inflammation in RA [114].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Signaling pathway analysis in CD19+ B- cells, CD4+ T- cells, and CD14+ monocytes from RA patients. Enrichment of MAPK signaling pathway in CD19+ B (A) and CD4+ T (B) cells and PI3K signaling pathway in CD14+ monocytes (C). Up-regulated (red), down-regulated (green), and unchanged (gray) genes are marked in the figure. Modified from [113].

The T cell cytokine IL-17 is highly produced by RA synovium [115], and increased levels of Th17 cells [116] and Tfh cells supporting high affinity and long-term antibody responses correlating to disease activity [117] were identified in the blood samples from RA patients. Increased PD-1highCXCR5-CD4+ T cells in the synovium of RA patients specifically promoted B cell responses and the generation of antibodies within inflamed nonlymphoid tissue in RA patients [118]. Other disease-relevant T-cell subsets (effector memory-Tfh and T helper 17) and disease-driving pathways like mTORC1, IL-2-STAT5, cell cycle, E2F, and interferon-related genes, several proinflammatory cytokines, and chemokines involved in RA pathogenesis were also reported earlier [119]. B cells and macrophages present disease-related antigens to T cells to secrete cytokines [120], activating chondrocytes and osteoclasts to produce matrix lysing enzymes, leading to cartilage degradation and bone resorption [121].

3.3. Monocytes/Macrophages

Macrophages play a crucial role in the chronic inflammation and progressive joint destruction in RA. The resident macrophage-like synovial cells in the joint intimal lining layer are of monocyte–macrophage lineage, originating from the bone marrow [122]. Synovial macrophages, primarily of the phenotype known as M1, are characterized by their elevated levels of proinflammatory proteins, such as prolyl hydroxylase 3 (PHD3), matrix metalloproteinase 12 (MMP12), C–C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [3]. M1 macrophages also secrete a variety of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-12, and IL-1β) as well as chemokines (e.g., CCL2 and CCL5) that contribute to joint tissue damage [123]. These proinflammatory M1 cells promote inflammation and neutrophils and recruit immune cells such as monocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes to the affected joints, activating fibroblasts and osteoclasts, thereby collectively triggering a cascade of damaging inflammatory reactions within the synovium.

Numerous macrophages are present in the inflamed synovial membrane and at the cartilage–pannus junction [124], possibly due to defects in apoptosis. NF-κB activation [125] and signaling through the PI-3K-AKT pathway [126] have been shown to inhibit apoptosis. FLIP (FADD-like IL-1β-converting enzyme-inhibitory protein) is highly expressed in RA synovial macrophages, which prevents Fas-mediated apoptosis [126]. In addition, the synovial environment is hypoxic, and low pO2 is a potent inhibitor of apoptosis. In RA joints, macrophages show over-expression of MHC class II and production of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, GM-CSF, and IL-6), chemokines (IL-8, MIP-1α, and MCP-1), metalloproteinases, and neopterin [127], which could drive the disease progression. Furthermore, monocytes present antigens to T cells and regulate their differentiation and functions, contributing to their immune and inflammatory responses. In the synovium, monocytes differentiate into macrophages and osteoclasts, causing the production of proinflammatory factors and bone destruction [128]. Macrophage depletion from inflamed tissues seems to have therapeutic benefits in RA [129]. The macrophage-like synoviocytes present in the joints of RA patients produce several proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, and other inflammatory factors contributing to cartilage and bone damage. Activation of macrophages by proinflammatory cytokines, antigen-antibody complexes, and TLR agonists [130] is a crucial step in the pathogenesis of RA. While identifying abnormally methylated DEGs and pathogenic mechanisms in monocytes via comprehensive bioinformatics analysis, we found enrichment of the PI3K pathway in the RA [113]; therefore, PI3K Inhibitors could also be helpful in the treatment of inflammation and autoimmunity [131].

During inflammation, proinflammatory M1 type macrophages and Th17 cells show metabolic changes by shifting toward increased uptake of glucose, breakdown of glucose to produce energy, and use of the pentose phosphate pathway generating NADPH and non-oxidative synthesis of pentoses, the five carbon-containing sugar molecules. In contrast, anti-inflammatory cells like M2-type macrophages, regulatory and memory T cells display a lower level of glycolysis but with an increased state of oxidative metabolism [132]. Two lineages of synovial macrophages in the mice were identified earlier: intrinsic macrophages expressing anti-inflammatory cytokines and extrinsic macrophages expressing proinflammatory cytokines [133]. A similar population of cells has also been identified in patients with RA. Therefore, changes in the immune metabolism suggest possible new therapeutic approaches targeting the proinflammatory metabolic pathways of macrophages.

3.4. Dendritic Cells and Neutrophils

In RA, dendritic cells (DCs) take on a multiplex role, contributing to the autoimmune process of the disease. During regular homeostasis, DCs maintain immune regulation, whereas, during RA, DCs can trigger the differentiation and activation of autoreactive T cells by presenting self-peptides on their cell surface and triggering innate immune functions. This can drive the inflammatory cascade, contributing to the chronic inflammation in RA. Metabolism has a decisive role in activating the conventional dendritic cells in the RA synovium that have an increased capacity to migrate and activate T cells, and the plasmacytoid dendritic cells that could be tolerogenic [134].

Similarly, neutrophils have been found to have increased inflammatory activity and oxidative stress in RA. Neutrophils release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which in turn interact with fibroblasts-like synoviocytes (FLS), contributing to proinflammatory cytokine release, generation of autoantibodies, and antigen presentation [135]. Elevated concentrations of NETs have been identified in the serum, synovial tissue, rheumatoid nodules, and skin of ACPA-positive RA patients. The activated neutrophils ingest immune complexes, releasing a spectrum of proteases and oxidative radicals that induce cartilage matrix degradation in the joints [136].

3.5. Non-Immune Cells in RA

Chondrocytes, fibroblasts, and osteoclasts are the primary non-immune cells that can contribute to the pathogenesis of RA (Figure 3). Chondrocytes, originating from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), produce collagen and extracellular matrix (ECM) components and are responsible for the maintenance of cartilaginous matrix and articular cartilage development. Chondrocyte functions are regulated by various cytokines and cellular signals [137]. However, under inflammatory conditions, activated chondrocytes participate in the degradation of cartilage and release of cytokines into the synovium, causing increases in the catabolic reactions and proinflammatory processes [3]. Autoantibodies affect chondrocytes in the cartilage by activating them, causing degradation, and releasing cytokines into the synovium. This leads to increased catabolic reactions and proinflammatory processes that worsen the state of RA via the breakdown of cartilage with a positive feedback loop. For example, autoantibodies binding to a specific epitope of CII were shown to impair matrix synthesis in chondrocytes [34] and another monoclonal antibody-induced abnormal chondrocyte morphology [138] demonstrating antibody-mediated effects on chondrocytes. However, extracellular vesicles from MSC can rescue the disease phenotypes of chondrocytes [139].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Possible interactions between immune and non-immune cells and their activation during RA development. Modified from [3].

Fibroblasts-like synoviocytes (FLS), a type of specialized mesenchymal cells, contribute substantially to RA development by secreting several inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α and IL-17, matrix-lysing enzymes, and chemokines under inflammatory conditions, which confer an aggressive and invasive phenotype to them. FLS, after being stimulated by IL-17, transforms into a hyperactive form, aiding RA progression. FLSs become tumor-like in their phenotype due to epigenetic changes, and secrete cytokines and proteases that mediate the destruction of cartilage and further RA progression. These FLSs transform the synovium into a hyperproliferative, invading pannus-like structure, secreting inflammatory molecules, perpetuating inflammation, and destroying joint cartilage, bone, and ECM [140]. Glycolysis is activated in RA-FLSs because of the ongoing inflammation, and targeting the glycolytic pathway could plausibly reduce inflammation [141]. Earlier, we have shown that metformin, an AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator, blocked FLS expansion, dispersion, and stimulation [142]. In addition, metformin inhibited the expression of inflammatory cytokines while increasing the hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 1 (HAPLN1) expression [142]. Later, HAPLN1, which contributes to the stability of ECM and compression resistance of the joints [143], was found to promote the expansion and inflammatory phenotype of FLS [144].

T cell cytokines such as interleukin IL-2 and interferon IFN-γ are in relatively low concentrations. In contrast, macrophage and fibroblast products were abundant [145], including IL-1, IL-6, IL-15, IL-18, TNF-α, GM-CSF, various chemokines, and many others, which are produced by rheumatoid synovium. The effector cytokines, TNF-α, and IL-1β levels strongly correlate with disease symptoms and joint damage in RA [124]. Moreover, IL-1 increases the production of factors that stimulate cartilage matrix degradation and could inhibit the synthesis of CII and proteoglycans, significant proteins in the articular cartilage. Suppressive cytokines, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and IL-1 receptor antagonist, as well as anti-inflammatory cytokine signaling mechanisms, such as the suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3), are expressed in RA synovium but at levels that are inadequate to block synovitis [146].

Osteoclasts, formed after fusion and differentiation of mononuclear precursor cells, could resorb bone matrix by producing various proteases [147]. Both TNF-α and IL-1β have been implicated in the dysregulation of bone and cartilage remodeling, characteristic of RA, by up-regulating the production of RANKL, which enhances osteoclastic bone resorption. In addition, TNF-receptor-associated factor (TRAF) activates the osteoclasts to degrade the bones. TNF-α stimulates the differentiation of osteoclast progenitors into mature osteoclasts, and IL-1 acts directly on osteoclasts to increase the bone-resorbing capacity of these cells. Osteoclast numbers are regulated by maintaining a balance between differentiation and death. Hence, bone loss could be prevented by reducing their formation and increasing the rate of cell death. Both programmed cell death [148] and microRNA [149,150,151] can regulate bone homeostasis. Several miRNAs were shown to be involved in the formation and maturation of osteoclasts, apoptosis, and their bone resorptive functions. So, inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and promoting osteoclast apoptosis might improve bone destruction. Recently, we reported the osteoprotective functions of a pathogenic bacterium, Proteus-mirabilis-derived outer membrane vesicles (OMVs). P. mirabilis OMVs inhibited the expression of miR96-5p, leading to an increase in ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 1 (Abca1) and mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in osteoclasts by enhancing the level of intracellular ROS and disintegration of mitochondrial membrane potential. Thus, modified OMVs with reduced toxicity and miRNAs could plausibly be used to treat osteolytic patients [152]. The role of intestinal microbiome, therapeutic modulation, and contribution of prebiotics and probiotics in RA therapy were discussed earlier [153,154,155].

RA patients are generally treated with disease-modifying, anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), which function via immunosuppression and immunomodulation. Conventional DMARDs include the most-used methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, and cyclosporine. At the same time, biological DMARDs like infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, tofacitinib, and others are used more specifically to target an immunological pathway. A combination therapy with a biological and a conventional DMARD has shown to be a more promising treatment than monotherapy to attenuate inflammation and reduce long-term joint damage. However, continuous use of DMARDs could cause several side effects, including an increased risk for infections, abdominal pain, liver problems, GI disturbances, etc. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in the treatment of RA to manage pain, inflammation, and swelling, but they do not significantly affect the progression of the disease. Although the potential side effects of glucocorticoids for treatment in RA preclude its frequent use, because of their anti-inflammatory properties and the capacity to decrease radiologic progression in early RA, the European League Against Rheumatism and the American College of Rheumatology recommend glucocorticoids as an adjunct treatment to conventional synthetic DMARDs, at the lowest dose for the shortest time. Therefore, it is crucial to detect RA at an early stage for treatment to prevent the radiographic progression of the disease.

4. Conclusions

Genetic and environmental factors contribute to the development of RA. Smoking, infections, and pollutants could cause mucosal inflammation, inducing epigenetic modifications and post-translational modifications of proteins before the induction of clinical disease in genetically predisposed individuals. The breakdown of immune tolerance mechanisms leads to an aberrant activation of immune cells, production of cytokines, and autoantibodies, which in turn activates more immune and non-immune cells. Autoantibodies in the form of immune complexes activate the immune system further and are identified as one of the contributors to the development of pain, cartilage destruction, and bone damage. If the damage is minor and transient, disease resolution occurs, but in untreated patients or under constant stimulation, chronic inflammation persists, which damages the joints, causing disability.

The principal site of inflammation in arthritis is the synovial membrane, where the residential FLS and synovial macrophages, upon aberrant activation, secretes cytokines and enzymes destroying cartilage. Alterations in the metabolic pathways in these cells were observed. Therefore, targeting them could attenuate inflammation and damage to joints in RA. The issue is the specificity in targeting the metabolic pathways only in specific inflammatory cells. However, it is still possible to deliver drugs to individual cells by conjugating them to antibodies or antibody-coated nanoparticles. Therapies targeting synovial fibroblasts include several mechanisms, as discussed recently by Chu [156]: inducing cell death through fibroblast-associated proteins, inhibiting binding to matrix protein, blocking signaling with endothelial cells, inhibiting proliferation and invasion, promoting apoptosis, inducing cellular senescence, and modulating fibroblast glucose metabolism. Similarly, inducing apoptosis in synovial macrophages and osteoclasts by using a chemotherapeutic-drug-loaded MMP9-cleavable, PEG- and RGD-peptide-modified PLGA nanoparticles were shown to be promising for treating severe inflammatory arthritis [157]. However, clinical studies are needed for further evaluation of these strategies.

Treatment with post-translationally modified peptides could attenuate inflammation. However, we do not know the actual autoantigens involved in arthritis, though several candidates have been proposed and tested so far. Similarly, antigen-specific tolerization by vaccination also has the same issue of identifying the causative autoantigens. Targeting specific cells like B cells with rituximab and inflammatory pathways like TNF-specific inhibitors improves joint inflammation. Still, it could pose various issues like treatment-associated infections, the economic burden to patients and society, treatment unresponsive patients, and so on. These treatment modalities are also not a cure for the disease.

Similarly, removing pathogenic antibodies from circulation or cleavage of Fc-carbohydrates can only decrease the inflammation at the effector phase of arthritis. However, using EVs from MSC could be a promising approach to reverse the inflammatory phenotypes in arthritis. Though there are many approaches for treating joint inflammation available both at clinical and pre-clinical stages, and more basic research needs to be conducted to understand the various disease pathways operating in the pre-RA phase before disease initiation and identifying the causative autoantigens and factors responsible for RA development.

Abbreviations

Abca1 ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 1
ADCC Antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity
ACPA Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies
AMPK Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase
APC Antigen-presenting cell
ATP Adenosine triphosphate
Bcl-6 B cell lymphoma 6 transcription factor
BiP Immunoglobulin-binding protein
CarP Carbamylated protein
CCL Chemokine Ligand
CCR2 C–C chemokine receptor type 2
CDC Complement-dependent cytotoxicity
CIA Collagen-induced arthritis
CTLA-4 Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4
CXCL Chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand
CII Collagen type II
DC Dendritic cells
DMARD Disease-modifying, anti-rheumatic drug
E2F Transcription factor
ECM Extracellular matrix
EV Extracellular vesicle
FcγR Fc-gamma receptor
FLIP FADD-like IL-1β-converting enzyme-inhibitory protein
FLS Fibroblasts-like synoviocytes
FOXP3 Forkhead box P3
GATA3 GATA Binding Protein 3, a transcription factor
GC Germinal center
G-CSF Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
GM-CSF Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
GI Gastro-intestinal
GPI Glucose-6 phosphatase isomerase
HAPLN1 Hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 1
HLA Human leukocyte antigen
IL Interleukin
LAG-3 Lymphocyte-activation gene 3
K/BxN Mice expressing T cell receptor transgene KRN and MHC class II Ag7
MAA Malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde adduct
MHC Major histocompatibility complex
MCP-1 Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
MIP-1α Macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha
miRNA microRNA
MMP Matrix metalloproteinase
MSC Mesenchymal stem cell
mTORC1 Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1
NADPH Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
NETs Neutrophil extracellular traps
NSAID Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug
OMV Outer membrane vesicles
PAD Peptidyl arginine deiminase
PDPs platelet-derived microparticles
PEG Polyethylene Glycol
PHD3 Prolyl hydroxylase 3
PLGA Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)
PTM Post-translational modification
PTPN22 Protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22
RA Rheumatoid arthritis
RANKL Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa beta (NFkB ligand)
RF Rheumatoid factor
RGD Arginylglycylaspartic acid
RORγt RAR-related orphan receptor gamma—a transcription factor
ROS Reactive oxygen species
SOCS3 Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3
Stat Signal transducer and activator of transcription
T-bet T-box family of transcription factor
TGF-β Transforming growth factor-β
TNF-α Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
Tfh cells T follicular helper cells
ZAP-70 Zeta chain of T cell receptor-associated protein kinase 70

Author Contributions

All authors were involved in the manuscript preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Smolen J.S., Breedveld F.C., Eberl G., Jones I., Leeming M., Wylie G.L., Kirkpatrick J. Validity and reliability of the twenty-eight-joint count for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:38–43. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Buch M.H., Emery P. New therapies in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2011;23:245–251. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283454124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fang Q., Zhou C., Nandakumar K.S. Molecular and Cellular Pathways Contributing to Joint Damage in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2020;2020:3830212. doi: 10.1155/2020/3830212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fang Q., Ou J., Nandakumar K.S. Autoantibodies as Diagnostic Markers and Mediator of Joint Inflammation in Arthritis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019;2019:6363086. doi: 10.1155/2019/6363086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Volkov M., van Schie K.A., van der Woude D. Autoantibodies and B Cells: The ABC of rheumatoid arthritis pathophysiology. Immunol. Rev. 2020;294:148–163. doi: 10.1111/imr.12829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mastellos D.C., Hajishengallis G., Lambris J.D. A guide to complement biology, pathology and therapeutic opportunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2023:1–24. doi: 10.1038/s41577-023-00926-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Woodruff T.M., Nandakumar K.S., Tedesco F. Inhibiting the C5-C5a receptor axis. Mol. Immunol. 2011;48:1631–1642. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nandakumar K.S. Targeting IgG in Arthritis: Disease Pathways and Therapeutic Avenues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:677. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rowley M.J., Nandakumar K.S., Holmdahl R. The role of collagen antibodies in mediating arthritis. Mod. Rheumatol. 2008;18:429–441. doi: 10.3109/s10165-008-0080-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Scherer H.U., van der Woude D., Toes R.E.M. From risk to chronicity: Evolution of autoreactive B cell and antibody responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2022;18:371–383. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-00786-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hill J.A., Bell D.A., Brintnell W., Yue D., Wehrli B., Jevnikar A.M., Lee D.M., Hueber W., Robinson W.H., Cairns E. Arthritis induced by posttranslationally modified (citrullinated) fibrinogen in DR4-IE transgenic mice. J. Exp. Med. 2008;205:967–979. doi: 10.1084/jem.20072051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schellekens G.A., de Jong B.A., van den Hoogen F.H., van de Putte L.B., van Venrooij W.J. Citrulline is an essential constituent of antigenic determinants recognized by rheumatoid arthritis-specific autoantibodies. J. Clin. Investig. 1998;101:273–281. doi: 10.1172/JCI1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Trouw L.A., Rispens T., Toes R.E.M. Beyond citrullination: Other post-translational protein modifications in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2017;13:331–339. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nguyen H., James E.A. Immune recognition of citrullinated epitopes. Immunology. 2016;149:131–138. doi: 10.1111/imm.12640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yap H.Y., Tee S.Z., Wong M.M., Chow S.K., Peh S.C., Teow S.Y. Pathogenic Role of Immune Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Implications in Clinical Treatment and Biomarker Development. Cells. 2018;7:161. doi: 10.3390/cells7100161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Van Beers J.J., Schwarte C.M., Stammen-Vogelzangs J., Oosterink E., Bozic B., Pruijn G.J. The rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid citrullinome reveals novel citrullinated epitopes in apolipoprotein E, myeloid nuclear differentiation antigen, and beta-actin. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:69–80. doi: 10.1002/art.37720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haag S., Schneider N., Mason D.E., Tuncel J., Andersson I.E., Peters E.C., Burkhardt H., Holmdahl R. Identification of new citrulline-specific autoantibodies, which bind to human arthritic cartilage, by mass spectrometric analysis of citrullinated type II collagen. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:1440–1449. doi: 10.1002/art.38383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ytterberg A.J., Joshua V., Reynisdottir G., Tarasova N.K., Rutishauser D., Ossipova E., Haj Hensvold A., Eklund A., Skold C.M., Grunewald J., et al. Shared immunological targets in the lungs and joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Identification and validation. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015;74:1772–1777. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Spengler J., Lugonja B., Ytterberg A.J., Zubarev R.A., Creese A.J., Pearson M.J., Grant M.M., Milward M., Lundberg K., Buckley C.D., et al. Release of Active Peptidyl Arginine Deiminases by Neutrophils Can Explain Production of Extracellular Citrullinated Autoantigens in Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Fluid. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:3135–3145. doi: 10.1002/art.39313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tutturen A.E., Fleckenstein B., de Souza G.A. Assessing the citrullinome in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid with and without enrichment of citrullinated peptides. J. Proteome Res. 2014;13:2867–2873. doi: 10.1021/pr500030x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Van Delft M.A.M., Verheul M.K., Burgers L.E., Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S., van der Helm-van Mil A.H.M., Huizinga T.W.J., Toes R.E.M., Trouw L.A. The anti-carbamylated protein antibody response is of overall low avidity despite extensive isotype switching. Rheumatology. 2018;57:1583–1591. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lundberg K., Bengtsson C., Kharlamova N., Reed E., Jiang X., Kallberg H., Pollak-Dorocic I., Israelsson L., Kessel C., Padyukov L., et al. Genetic and environmental determinants for disease risk in subsets of rheumatoid arthritis defined by the anticitrullinated protein/peptide antibody fine specificity profile. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013;72:652–658. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kokkonen H., Brink M., Hansson M., Lassen E., Mathsson-Alm L., Holmdahl R., Ronnelid J., Klareskog L., Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S. Associations of antibodies against citrullinated peptides with human leukocyte antigen-shared epitope and smoking prior to the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015;17:125. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0638-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Johansson L., Pratesi F., Brink M., Arlestig L., D’Amato C., Bartaloni D., Migliorini P., Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S. Antibodies directed against endogenous and exogenous citrullinated antigens pre-date the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016;18:127. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1031-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S., de Jong B.A., Berglin E., Hallmans G., Wadell G., Stenlund H., Sundin U., van Venrooij W.J. Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide and IgA rheumatoid factor predict the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:2741–2749. doi: 10.1002/art.11223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Van der Woude D., Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S., Ioan-Facsinay A., Onnekink C., Schwarte C.M., Verpoort K.N., Drijfhout J.W., Huizinga T.W., Toes R.E., Pruijn G.J. Epitope spreading of the anti-citrullinated protein antibody response occurs before disease onset and is associated with the disease course of early arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2010;69:1554–1561. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.124537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Van Steenbergen H.W., Raychaudhuri S., Rodriguez-Rodriguez L., Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S., Berglin E., Toes R.E., Huizinga T.W., Fernandez-Gutierrez B., Gregersen P.K., van der Helm-van Mil A.H. Association of valine and leucine at HLA-DRB1 position 11 with radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis, independent of the shared epitope alleles but not independent of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:877–886. doi: 10.1002/art.39018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Johansson L., Arlestig L., Kokkonen H., Brink M., Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S. An increased concentration of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand pre-dates the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2017;56:2190–2196. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Brink M., Hansson M., Mathsson-Alm L., Wijayatunga P., Verheul M.K., Trouw L.A., Holmdahl R., Ronnelid J., Klareskog L., Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S. Rheumatoid factor isotypes in relation to antibodies against citrullinated peptides and carbamylated proteins before the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016;18:43. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0940-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xu M., Du R., Xing W., Chen X., Wan J., Wang S., Xiong L., Nandakumar K.S., Holmdahl R., Geng H. Platelets derived citrullinated proteins and microparticles are potential autoantibodies ACPA targets in RA patients. Front. Immunol. 2023;14:1084283. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1084283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ge C., Holmdahl R. The structure, specificity and function of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2019;15:503–508. doi: 10.1038/s41584-019-0244-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Harre U., Georgess D., Bang H., Bozec A., Axmann R., Ossipova E., Jakobsson P.J., Baum W., Nimmerjahn F., Szarka E., et al. Induction of osteoclastogenesis and bone loss by human autoantibodies against citrullinated vimentin. J. Clin. Investig. 2012;122:1791–1802. doi: 10.1172/JCI60975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bajtner E., Nandakumar K.S., Engstrom A., Holmdahl R. Chronic development of collagen-induced arthritis is associated with arthritogenic antibodies against specific epitopes on type II collagen. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2005;7:R1148–R1157. doi: 10.1186/ar1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nandakumar K.S., Bajtner E., Hill L., Bohm B., Rowley M.J., Burkhardt H., Holmdahl R. Arthritogenic antibodies specific for a major type II collagen triple-helical epitope bind and destabilize cartilage independent of inflammation. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:184–196. doi: 10.1002/art.23049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Van Delft M.A.M., Huizinga T.W.J. An overview of autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Autoimmun. 2020;110:102392. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.102392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nandakumar K.S., Collin M., Happonen K.E., Lundstrom S.L., Croxford A.M., Xu B., Zubarev R.A., Rowley M.J., Blom A.M., Kjellman C., et al. Streptococcal Endo-beta-N-Acetylglucosaminidase Suppresses Antibody-Mediated Inflammation In Vivo. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1623. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nandakumar K.S., Collin M., Olsen A., Nimmerjahn F., Blom A.M., Ravetch J.V., Holmdahl R. Endoglycosidase treatment abrogates IgG arthritogenicity: Importance of IgG glycosylation in arthritis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007;37:2973–2982. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ercan A. Sex effect on the correlation of immunoglobulin G glycosylation with rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Turk. J. Biol. 2020;44:406–416. doi: 10.3906/biy-2005-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Du N., Song L., Li Y., Wang T., Fang Q., Ou J., Nandakumar K.S. Phytoestrogens protect joints in collagen induced arthritis by increasing IgG glycosylation and reducing osteoclast activation. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020;83:106387. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pfeifle R., Rothe T., Ipseiz N., Scherer H.U., Culemann S., Harre U., Ackermann J.A., Seefried M., Kleyer A., Uderhardt S., et al. Regulation of autoantibody activity by the IL-23-T(H)17 axis determines the onset of autoimmune disease. Nat. Immunol. 2017;18:104–113. doi: 10.1038/ni.3579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Malmstrom V., Catrina A.I., Klareskog L. The immunopathogenesis of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: From triggering to targeting. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017;17:60–75. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Petkova S.B., Konstantinov K.N., Sproule T.J., Lyons B.L., Awwami M.A., Roopenian D.C. Human antibodies induce arthritis in mice deficient in the low-affinity inhibitory IgG receptor Fc gamma RIIB. J. Exp. Med. 2006;203:275–280. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wooley P.H., Luthra H.S., Singh S.K., Huse A.R., Stuart J.M., David C.S. Passive transfer of arthritis to mice by injection of human anti-type II collagen antibody. Mayo Clin. Proc. 1984;59:737–743. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(12)65583-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cosenza S., Toupet K., Maumus M., Luz-Crawford P., Blanc-Brude O., Jorgensen C., Noel D. Mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes are more immunosuppressive than microparticles in inflammatory arthritis. Theranostics. 2018;8:1399–1410. doi: 10.7150/thno.21072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Klareskog L., Ronnelid J., Lundberg K., Padyukov L., Alfredsson L. Immunity to citrullinated proteins in rheumatoid arthritis. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008;26:651–675. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Uysal H., Bockermann R., Nandakumar K.S., Sehnert B., Bajtner E., Engstrom A., Serre G., Burkhardt H., Thunnissen M.M., Holmdahl R. Structure and pathogenicity of antibodies specific for citrullinated collagen type II in experimental arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 2009;206:449–462. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brink M., Verheul M.K., Ronnelid J., Berglin E., Holmdahl R., Toes R.E., Klareskog L., Trouw L.A., Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S. Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies in the pre-symptomatic phase of rheumatoid arthritis, their relationship with multiple anti-citrulline peptide antibodies and association with radiological damage. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015;17:25. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0536-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Deane K.D., Norris J.M., Holers V.M. Preclinical rheumatoid arthritis: Identification, evaluation, and future directions for investigation. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2010;36:213–241. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shi J., van de Stadt L.A., Levarht E.W., Huizinga T.W., Hamann D., van Schaardenburg D., Toes R.E., Trouw L.A. Anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies precede the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014;73:780–783. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Van der Linden M.P., van der Woude D., Ioan-Facsinay A., Levarht E.W., Stoeken-Rijsbergen G., Huizinga T.W., Toes R.E., van der Helm-van Mil A.H. Value of anti-modified citrullinated vimentin and third-generation anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide compared with second-generation anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and rheumatoid factor in predicting disease outcome in undifferentiated arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:2232–2241. doi: 10.1002/art.24716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ingegnoli F., Castelli R., Gualtierotti R. Rheumatoid factors: Clinical applications. Dis. Markers. 2013;35:727–734. doi: 10.1155/2013/726598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aggarwal R., Liao K., Nair R., Ringold S., Costenbader K.H. Anti-citrullinated peptide antibody assays and their role in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:1472–1483. doi: 10.1002/art.24827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Szekanecz Z., Szabo Z., Zeher M., Soos L., Danko K., Horvath I., Lakos G. Superior performance of the CCP3.1 test compared to CCP2 and MCV in the rheumatoid factor-negative RA population. Immunol. Res. 2013;56:439–443. doi: 10.1007/s12026-013-8425-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mahdi H., Fisher B.A., Kallberg H., Plant D., Malmstrom V., Ronnelid J., Charles P., Ding B., Alfredsson L., Padyukov L., et al. Specific interaction between genotype, smoking and autoimmunity to citrullinated alpha-enolase in the etiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:1319–1324. doi: 10.1038/ng.480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Curran A.M., Naik P., Giles J.T., Darrah E. PAD enzymes in rheumatoid arthritis: Pathogenic effectors and autoimmune targets. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2020;16:301–315. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0409-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li P., Li M., Lindberg M.R., Kennett M.J., Xiong N., Wang Y. PAD4 is essential for antibacterial innate immunity mediated by neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Exp. Med. 2010;207:1853–1862. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Samuels J., Ng Y.S., Coupillaud C., Paget D., Meffre E. Impaired early B cell tolerance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 2005;201:1659–1667. doi: 10.1084/jem.20042321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Goodnow C.C., Crosbie J., Adelstein S., Lavoie T.B., Smith-Gill S.J., Brink R.A., Pritchard-Briscoe H., Wotherspoon J.S., Loblay R.H., Raphael K., et al. Altered immunoglobulin expression and functional silencing of self-reactive B lymphocytes in transgenic mice. Nature. 1988;334:676–682. doi: 10.1038/334676a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mandik-Nayak L., Bui A., Noorchashm H., Eaton A., Erikson J. Regulation of anti-double-stranded DNA B cells in nonautoimmune mice: Localization to the T-B interface of the splenic follicle. J. Exp. Med. 1997;186:1257–1267. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.8.1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nemazee D.A., Burki K. Clonal deletion of B lymphocytes in a transgenic mouse bearing anti-MHC class I antibody genes. Nature. 1989;337:562–566. doi: 10.1038/337562a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gay D., Saunders T., Camper S., Weigert M. Receptor editing: An approach by autoreactive B cells to escape tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 1993;177:999–1008. doi: 10.1084/jem.177.4.999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nemazee D. Receptor editing in B cells. Adv. Immunol. 2000;74:89–126. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60909-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shlomchik M.J. Sites and stages of autoreactive B cell activation and regulation. Immunity. 2008;28:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Coutinho A., Kazatchkine M.D., Avrameas S. Natural autoantibodies. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 1995;7:812–818. doi: 10.1016/0952-7915(95)80053-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hannum L.G., Ni D., Haberman A.M., Weigert M.G., Shlomchik M.J. A disease-related rheumatoid factor autoantibody is not tolerized in a normal mouse: Implications for the origins of autoantibodies in autoimmune disease. J. Exp. Med. 1996;184:1269–1278. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.4.1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cao D., Khmaladze I., Jia H., Bajtner E., Nandakumar K.S., Blom T., Mo J.A., Holmdahl R. Pathogenic autoreactive B cells are not negatively selected toward matrix protein collagen II. J. Immunol. 2011;187:4451–4458. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Khmaladze I., Saxena A., Nandakumar K.S., Holmdahl R. B-cell epitope spreading and inflammation in a mouse model of arthritis is associated with a deficiency in reactive oxygen species production. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015;45:2243–2251. doi: 10.1002/eji.201545518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dahdah A., Habir K., Nandakumar K.S., Saxena A., Xu B., Holmdahl R., Malin S. Germinal Center B Cells Are Essential for Collagen-Induced Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:193–203. doi: 10.1002/art.40354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kristyanto H., Blomberg N.J., Slot L.M., van der Voort E.I.H., Kerkman P.F., Bakker A., Burgers L.E., Ten Brinck R.M., van der Helm-van Mil A.H.M., Spits H., et al. Persistently activated, proliferative memory autoreactive B cells promote inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020;12:eaaz5327. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz5327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Aarvak T., Natvig J.B. Cell-cell interactions in synovitis: Antigen presenting cells and T cell interaction in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. 2001;3:13–17. doi: 10.1186/ar135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Schlegel P.M., Steiert I., Kotter I., Muller C.A. B cells contribute to heterogeneity of IL-17 producing cells in rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e82580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Marston B., Palanichamy A., Anolik J.H. B cells in the pathogenesis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2010;22:307–315. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283369cb8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Deng J., Wang X., Chen Q., Sun X., Xiao F., Ko K.H., Zhang M., Lu L. B1a cells play a pathogenic role in the development of autoimmune arthritis. Oncotarget. 2016;7:19299–19311. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Titcombe P.J., Wigerblad G., Sippl N., Zhang N., Shmagel A.K., Sahlstrom P., Zhang Y., Barsness L.O., Ghodke-Puranik Y., Baharpoor A., et al. Pathogenic Citrulline-Multispecific B Cell Receptor Clades in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:1933–1945. doi: 10.1002/art.40590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Snir O., Widhe M., von Spee C., Lindberg J., Padyukov L., Lundberg K., Engstrom A., Venables P.J., Lundeberg J., Holmdahl R., et al. Multiple antibody reactivities to citrullinated antigens in sera from patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Association with HLA-DRB1 alleles. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2009;68:736–743. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.091355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Verpoort K.N., Cheung K., Ioan-Facsinay A., van der Helm-van Mil A.H., de Vries-Bouwstra J.K., Allaart C.F., Drijfhout J.W., de Vries R.R., Breedveld F.C., Huizinga T.W., et al. Fine specificity of the anti-citrullinated protein antibody response is influenced by the shared epitope alleles. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3949–3952. doi: 10.1002/art.23127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Burkhardt H., Sehnert B., Bockermann R., Engstrom A., Kalden J.R., Holmdahl R. Humoral immune response to citrullinated collagen type II determinants in early rheumatoid arthritis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005;35:1643–1652. doi: 10.1002/eji.200526000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Joshua V., Schobers L., Titcombe P.J., Israelsson L., Ronnelid J., Hansson M., Catrina A.I., Pruijn G.J., Malmstrom V. Antibody responses to de novo identified citrullinated fibrinogen peptides in rheumatoid arthritis and visualization of the corresponding B cells. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016;18:284. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1181-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kinloch A., Tatzer V., Wait R., Peston D., Lundberg K., Donatien P., Moyes D., Taylor P.C., Venables P.J. Identification of citrullinated alpha-enolase as a candidate autoantigen in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2005;7:R1421–R1429. doi: 10.1186/ar1845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Liang B., Ge C., Lonnblom E., Lin X., Feng H., Xiao L., Bai J., Ayoglu B., Nilsson P., Nandakumar K.S., et al. The autoantibody response to cyclic citrullinated collagen type II peptides in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2019;58:1623–1633. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lundberg K., Kinloch A., Fisher B.A., Wegner N., Wait R., Charles P., Mikuls T.R., Venables P.J. Antibodies to citrullinated alpha-enolase peptide 1 are specific for rheumatoid arthritis and cross-react with bacterial enolase. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:3009–3019. doi: 10.1002/art.23936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Pratesi F., Dioni I., Tommasi C., Alcaro M.C., Paolini I., Barbetti F., Boscaro F., Panza F., Puxeddu I., Rovero P., et al. Antibodies from patients with rheumatoid arthritis target citrullinated histone 4 contained in neutrophils extracellular traps. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014;73:1414–1422. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sebbag M., Moinard N., Auger I., Clavel C., Arnaud J., Nogueira L., Roudier J., Serre G. Epitopes of human fibrin recognized by the rheumatoid arthritis-specific autoantibodies to citrullinated proteins. Eur. J. Immunol. 2006;36:2250–2263. doi: 10.1002/eji.200535790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Brink M., Hansson M., Mathsson L., Jakobsson P.J., Holmdahl R., Hallmans G., Stenlund H., Ronnelid J., Klareskog L., Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S. Multiplex analyses of antibodies against citrullinated peptides in individuals prior to development of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:899–910. doi: 10.1002/art.37835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kongpachith S., Lingampalli N., Ju C.H., Blum L.K., Lu D.R., Elliott S.E., Mao R., Robinson W.H. Affinity Maturation of the Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody Paratope Drives Epitope Spreading and Polyreactivity in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:507–517. doi: 10.1002/art.40760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Sokolove J., Bromberg R., Deane K.D., Lahey L.J., Derber L.A., Chandra P.E., Edison J.D., Gilliland W.R., Tibshirani R.J., Norris J.M., et al. Autoantibody epitope spreading in the pre-clinical phase predicts progression to rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e35296. doi: 10.1371/annotation/2e462817-ab93-4d78-95a4-1d8b9d172971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Van de Stadt L.A., de Koning M.H., van de Stadt R.J., Wolbink G., Dijkmans B.A., Hamann D., van Schaardenburg D. Development of the anti-citrullinated protein antibody repertoire prior to the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:3226–3233. doi: 10.1002/art.30537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Boross P., Verbeek J.S. The complex role of Fcgamma receptors in the pathology of arthritis. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 2006;28:339–350. doi: 10.1007/s00281-006-0049-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.He Y., Ge C., Moreno-Giro A., Xu B., Beusch C.M., Sandor K., Su J., Cheng L., Lonnblom E., Lundqvist C., et al. A subset of antibodies targeting citrullinated proteins confers protection from rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:691. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36257-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dorner T., Radbruch A., Burmester G.R. B-cell-directed therapies for autoimmune disease. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2009;5:433–441. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Edwards J.C., Szczepanski L., Szechinski J., Filipowicz-Sosnowska A., Emery P., Close D.R., Stevens R.M., Shaw T. Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;350:2572–2581. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Toubi E., Kessel A., Slobodin G., Boulman N., Pavlotzky E., Zisman D., Rozenbaum M., Rosner I. Changes in macrophage function after rituximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2007;66:818–820. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.062505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Takemura S., Klimiuk P.A., Braun A., Goronzy J.J., Weyand C.M. T cell activation in rheumatoid synovium is B cell dependent. J. Immunol. 2001;167:4710–4718. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.8.4710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zou F., Wang X., Han X., Rothschild G., Zheng S.G., Basu U., Sun J. Expression and Function of Tetraspanins and Their Interacting Partners in B Cells. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1606. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Takemura S., Braun A., Crowson C., Kurtin P.J., Cofield R.H., O’Fallon W.M., Goronzy J.J., Weyand C.M. Lymphoid neogenesis in rheumatoid synovitis. J. Immunol. 2001;167:1072–1080. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.2.1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Meednu N., Zhang H., Owen T., Sun W., Wang V., Cistrone C., Rangel-Moreno J., Xing L., Anolik J.H. Production of RANKL by Memory B Cells: A Link Between B Cells and Bone Erosion in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:805–816. doi: 10.1002/art.39489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mahendra A., Yang X., Abnouf S., Adolacion J.R.T., Park D., Soomro S., Roszik J., Coarfa C., Romain G., Wanzeck K., et al. Beyond Autoantibodies: Biologic Roles of Human Autoreactive B Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis Revealed by RNA-Sequencing. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:529–541. doi: 10.1002/art.40772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Cope A.P., Schulze-Koops H., Aringer M. The central role of T cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2007;25:S4–S11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Gregersen P.K., Silver J., Winchester R.J. The shared epitope hypothesis. An approach to understanding the molecular genetics of susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1987;30:1205–1213. doi: 10.1002/art.1780301102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kurko J., Besenyei T., Laki J., Glant T.T., Mikecz K., Szekanecz Z. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis—A comprehensive review. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2013;45:170–179. doi: 10.1007/s12016-012-8346-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Duke O., Panayi G.S., Janossy G., Poulter L.W. An immunohistological analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations and their microenvironment in the synovial membranes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis using monoclonal antibodies. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1982;49:22–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Van Oosterhout M., Bajema I., Levarht E.W., Toes R.E., Huizinga T.W., van Laar J.M. Differences in synovial tissue infiltrates between anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-positive rheumatoid arthritis and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-negative rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:53–60. doi: 10.1002/art.23148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Szabo S.J., Kim S.T., Costa G.L., Zhang X., Fathman C.G., Glimcher L.H. A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell. 2000;100:655–669. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80702-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Zheng W., Flavell R.A. The transcription factor GATA-3 is necessary and sufficient for Th2 cytokine gene expression in CD4 T cells. Cell. 1997;89:587–596. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80240-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ivanov I.I., McKenzie B.S., Zhou L., Tadokoro C.E., Lepelley A., Lafaille J.J., Cua D.J., Littman D.R. The orphan nuclear receptor RORgammat directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells. Cell. 2006;126:1121–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Johnston R.J., Poholek A.C., DiToro D., Yusuf I., Eto D., Barnett B., Dent A.L., Craft J., Crotty S. Bcl6 and Blimp-1 are reciprocal and antagonistic regulators of T follicular helper cell differentiation. Science. 2009;325:1006–1010. doi: 10.1126/science.1175870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Nurieva R.I., Chung Y., Martinez G.J., Yang X.O., Tanaka S., Matskevitch T.D., Wang Y.H., Dong C. Bcl6 mediates the development of T follicular helper cells. Science. 2009;325:1001–1005. doi: 10.1126/science.1176676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Yu D., Rao S., Tsai L.M., Lee S.K., He Y., Sutcliffe E.L., Srivastava M., Linterman M., Zheng L., Simpson N., et al. The transcriptional repressor Bcl-6 directs T follicular helper cell lineage commitment. Immunity. 2009;31:457–468. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Sakaguchi S., Yamaguchi T., Nomura T., Ono M. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell. 2008;133:775–787. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Noack M., Miossec P. Th17 and regulatory T cell balance in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2014;13:668–677. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2013.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Wing K., Onishi Y., Prieto-Martin P., Yamaguchi T., Miyara M., Fehervari Z., Nomura T., Sakaguchi S. CTLA-4 control over Foxp3+ regulatory T cell function. Science. 2008;322:271–275. doi: 10.1126/science.1160062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Chen S.Y., Hsu W.T., Chen Y.L., Chien C.H., Chiang B.L. Lymphocyte-activation gene 3(+) (LAG3(+)) forkhead box protein 3(-) (FOXP3(-)) regulatory T cells induced by B cells alleviates joint inflammation in collagen-induced arthritis. J. Autoimmun. 2016;68:75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Fang Q., Li T., Chen P., Wu Y., Wang T., Mo L., Ou J., Nandakumar K.S. Comparative Analysis on Abnormal Methylome of Differentially Expressed Genes and Disease Pathways in the Immune Cells of RA and SLE. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:668007. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.668007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ralph J.A., Morand E.F. MAPK phosphatases as novel targets for rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2008;12:795–808. doi: 10.1517/14728222.12.7.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Chabaud M., Durand J.M., Buchs N., Fossiez F., Page G., Frappart L., Miossec P. Human interleukin-17: A T cell-derived proinflammatory cytokine produced by the rheumatoid synovium. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:963–970. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199905)42:5<963::AID-ANR15>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Leipe J., Grunke M., Dechant C., Reindl C., Kerzendorf U., Schulze-Koops H., Skapenko A. Role of Th17 cells in human autoimmune arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2876–2885. doi: 10.1002/art.27622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ma J., Zhu C., Ma B., Tian J., Baidoo S.E., Mao C., Wu W., Chen J., Tong J., Yang M., et al. Increased frequency of circulating follicular helper T cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012;2012:827480. doi: 10.1155/2012/827480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Rao D.A., Gurish M.F., Marshall J.L., Slowikowski K., Fonseka C.Y., Liu Y., Donlin L.T., Henderson L.A., Wei K., Mizoguchi F., et al. Pathologically expanded peripheral T helper cell subset drives B cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature. 2017;542:110–114. doi: 10.1038/nature20810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Takeshita M., Suzuki K., Kondo Y., Morita R., Okuzono Y., Koga K., Kassai Y., Gamo K., Takiguchi M., Kurisu R., et al. Multi-dimensional analysis identified rheumatoid arthritis-driving pathway in human T cell. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019;78:1346–1356. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Choy E. Understanding the dynamics: Pathways involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2012;51((Suppl. 5)):v3–v11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Mateen S., Zafar A., Moin S., Khan A.Q., Zubair S. Understanding the role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2016;455:161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Edwards J.C., Willoughby D.A. Demonstration of bone marrow derived cells in synovial lining by means of giant intracellular granules as genetic markers. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1982;41:177–182. doi: 10.1136/ard.41.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Ross E.A., Devitt A., Johnson J.R. Macrophages: The Good, the Bad, and the Gluttony. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:708186. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.708186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Mulherin D., Fitzgerald O., Bresnihan B. Synovial tissue macrophage populations and articular damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:115–124. doi: 10.1002/art.1780390116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Handel M.L., McMorrow L.B., Gravallese E.M. Nuclear factor-kappa B in rheumatoid synovium. Localization of p50 and p65. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:1762–1770. doi: 10.1002/art.1780381209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Perlman H., Pagliari L.J., Volin M.V. Regulation of apoptosis and cell cycle activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr. Mol. Med. 2001;1:597–608. doi: 10.2174/1566524013363429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Kinne R.W., Brauer R., Stuhlmuller B., Palombo-Kinne E., Burmester G.R. Macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. 2000;2:189–202. doi: 10.1186/ar86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Sprangers S., de Vries T.J., Everts V. Monocyte Heterogeneity: Consequences for Monocyte-Derived Immune Cells. J. Immunol. Res. 2016;2016:1475435. doi: 10.1155/2016/1475435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Udalova I.A., Mantovani A., Feldmann M. Macrophage heterogeneity in the context of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2016;12:472–485. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Murray P.J., Allen J.E., Biswas S.K., Fisher E.A., Gilroy D.W., Goerdt S., Gordon S., Hamilton J.A., Ivashkiv L.B., Lawrence T., et al. Macrophage activation and polarization: Nomenclature and experimental guidelines. Immunity. 2014;41:14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Stark A.K., Sriskantharajah S., Hessel E.M., Okkenhaug K. PI3K inhibitors in inflammation, autoimmunity and cancer. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2015;23:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2015.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Ghesquiere B., Wong B.W., Kuchnio A., Carmeliet P. Metabolism of stromal and immune cells in health and disease. Nature. 2014;511:167–176. doi: 10.1038/nature13312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Tu J., Hong W., Guo Y., Zhang P., Fang Y., Wang X., Chen X., Lu S., Wei W. Ontogeny of Synovial Macrophages and the Roles of Synovial Macrophages From Different Origins in Arthritis. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1146. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Suwa Y., Nagafuchi Y., Yamada S., Fujio K. The role of dendritic cells and their immunometabolism in rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Immunol. 2023;14:1161148. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1161148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.O’Neil L.J., Kaplan M.J. Neutrophils in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Breaking Immune Tolerance and Fueling Disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2019;25:215–227. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2018.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Nandakumar K.S., Holmdahl R. Antibody-induced arthritis: Disease mechanisms and genes involved at the effector phase of arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2006;8:223. doi: 10.1186/ar2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Chen H., Tan X.N., Hu S., Liu R.Q., Peng L.H., Li Y.M., Wu P. Molecular Mechanisms of Chondrocyte Proliferation and Differentiation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:664168. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.664168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Amirahmadi S.F., Whittingham S., Crombie D.E., Nandakumar K.S., Holmdahl R., Mackay I.R., van Damme M.P., Rowley M.J. Arthritogenic anti-type II collagen antibodies are pathogenic for cartilage-derived chondrocytes independent of inflammatory cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1897–1906. doi: 10.1002/art.21097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Bertolino G.M., Maumus M., Jorgensen C., Noel D. Therapeutic potential in rheumatic diseases of extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stromal cells. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2023;19:682–694. doi: 10.1038/s41584-023-01010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Nygaard G., Firestein G.S. Restoring synovial homeostasis in rheumatoid arthritis by targeting fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2020;16:316–333. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0413-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Garcia-Carbonell R., Divakaruni A.S., Lodi A., Vicente-Suarez I., Saha A., Cheroutre H., Boss G.R., Tiziani S., Murphy A.N., Guma M. Critical Role of Glucose Metabolism in Rheumatoid Arthritis Fibroblast-like Synoviocytes. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:1614–1626. doi: 10.1002/art.39608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Chen Y., Qiu F., Yu B., Chen Y., Zuo F., Zhu X., Nandakumar K.S., Xiao C. Metformin, an AMPK Activator, Inhibits Activation of FLSs but Promotes HAPLN1 Secretion. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2020;17:1202–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2020.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Evanko S.P., Gooden M.D., Kang I., Chan C.K., Vernon R.B., Wight T.N. A Role for HAPLN1 During Phenotypic Modulation of Human Lung Fibroblasts In Vitro. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2020;68:797–811. doi: 10.1369/0022155420966663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Chen Y., Wang B., Chen Y., Wu Q., Lai W.F., Wei L., Nandakumar K.S., Liu D. HAPLN1 Affects Cell Viability and Promotes the Proinflammatory Phenotype of Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:888612. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.888612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Firestein G.S., Alvaro-Gracia J.M., Maki R. Quantitative analysis of cytokine gene expression in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Immunol. 1990;144:3347–3353. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.144.9.3347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Shouda T., Yoshida T., Hanada T., Wakioka T., Oishi M., Miyoshi K., Komiya S., Kosai K., Hanakawa Y., Hashimoto K., et al. Induction of the cytokine signal regulator SOCS3/CIS3 as a therapeutic strategy for treating inflammatory arthritis. J. Clin. Investig. 2001;108:1781–1788. doi: 10.1172/JCI13568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Edwards J.R., Mundy G.R. Advances in osteoclast biology: Old findings and new insights from mouse models. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2011;7:235–243. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Kumar A., Mahendra J., Samuel S., Govindraj J., Loganathan T., Vashum Y., Mahendra L., Krishnamoorthy T. Platelet-rich fibrin/biphasic calcium phosphate impairs osteoclast differentiation and promotes apoptosis by the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway in chronic periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 2019;90:61–71. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Donate P.B., Alves de Lima K., Peres R.S., Almeida F., Fukada S.Y., Silva T.A., Nascimento D.C., Cecilio N.T., Talbot J., Oliveira R.D., et al. Cigarette smoke induces miR-132 in Th17 cells that enhance osteoclastogenesis in inflammatory arthritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2017120118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017120118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Inoue K., Deng Z., Chen Y., Giannopoulou E., Xu R., Gong S., Greenblatt M.B., Mangala L.S., Lopez-Berestein G., Kirsch D.G., et al. Bone protection by inhibition of microRNA-182. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:4108. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06446-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Yu L., Sui B., Fan W., Lei L., Zhou L., Yang L., Diao Y., Zhang Y., Li Z., Liu J., et al. Exosomes derived from osteogenic tumor activate osteoclast differentiation and concurrently inhibit osteogenesis by transferring COL1A1-targeting miRNA-92a-1-5p. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2021;10:e12056. doi: 10.1002/jev2.12056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Wang T., Mo L., Ou J., Fang Q., Wu H., Wu Y., Nandakumar K.S. Proteus mirabilis Vesicles Induce Mitochondrial Apoptosis by Regulating miR96-5p/Abca1 to Inhibit Osteoclastogenesis and Bone Loss. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:833040. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.833040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Bodkhe R., Balakrishnan B., Taneja V. The role of microbiome in rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2019;11:1759720X19844632. doi: 10.1177/1759720X19844632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Zhao T., Wei Y., Zhu Y., Xie Z., Hai Q., Li Z., Qin D. Gut microbiota and rheumatoid arthritis: From pathogenesis to novel therapeutic opportunities. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:1007165. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1007165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Lin L., Zhang K., Xiong Q., Zhang J., Cai B., Huang Z., Yang B., Wei B., Chen J., Niu Q. Gut microbiota in pre-clinical rheumatoid arthritis: From pathogenesis to preventing progression. J. Autoimmun. 2023:103001. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Chu C.Q. Highlights of Strategies Targeting Fibroblasts for Novel Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Front. Med. 2022;9:846300. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.846300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Deng C., Zhang Q., He P., Zhou B., He K., Sun X., Lei G., Gong T., Zhang Z. Targeted apoptosis of macrophages and osteoclasts in arthritic joints is effective against advanced inflammatory arthritis. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:2174. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22454-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES