ABSTRACT
Azole antifungals remain the “gold standard” therapy for invasive aspergillosis. The world-wide emergence of isolates resistant to this drug class, however, developed into a steadily increasing threat to human health over the past years. In Aspergillus fumigatus, major mechanisms of resistance involve increased expression of cyp51A encoding one of two isoenzymes targeted by azoles. Yet, the level of resistance caused by cyp51A upregulation, driven by either clinically relevant tandem repeat mutations within its promoter or the use of high expressing heterologous promoters, is limited. Cytochrome P450 enzymes such as Cyp51A rely on redox partners that provide electrons for their activity. A. fumigatus harbors several genes encoding putative candidate proteins including two paralogous cytochrome P450 reductases, CprA and CprB, and the cytochrome b 5 CybE. In this work, we investigated the contribution of each cprA, cprB, and cybE overexpression to cyp51A-mediated resistance to different medical and agricultural azoles. Using the bidirectional promoter PxylP, we conditionally expressed these genes in combination with cyp51A, revealing cprA as the main limiting factor. Similar to this approach, we overexpressed cprA in an azole-resistant background strain carrying a cyp51A allele with TR34 in its promoter, which led to a further increase in its resistance. Employing sterol measurements, we demonstrate an enhanced eburicol turnover during upregulation of either cprA or cyp51A, which was even more pronounced during their simultaneous overexpression. In summary, our work suggests that mutations leading to increased Cyp51A activity through increased electron supply could be key factors that elevate azole resistance.
KEYWORDS: Aspergillus fumigatus, azole resistance, cyp51A, sterol C14-demethylase, cytochrome P450 reductase
INTRODUCTION
Members of the azole antifungal drug class constitute the preferred option for first-line treatment of invasive aspergillosis (1, 2), an often deadly infection that is mainly caused by the ubiquitous fungal mold pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus (3). Four years ago, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States put azole-resistant A. fumigatus on the watch list for antimicrobial resistance threats, and only recently, this pathogenic mold was listed within the critical group of the World Health Organization’s fungal priority pathogens list (4, 5). The world-wide occurrence and increase in azole-resistant isolates progressively develop into a threat to current medical therapeutic strategies (6, 7). Clinical resistance is mainly connected to mutations of the azole drug target encoding gene cyp51A or its promoter. However, a large proportion is attributed to non-cyp51A-based resistance mechanisms such as those arising from mutations of genes encoding 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase Hmg1, components of the CCAAT-binding complex, efflux pumps as well as so far uncharacterized mutations (8 – 10).
Inhibition of Cyp51 by azoles leads to the accumulation of toxic C14-methylated sterols and concomitant reduced ergosterol production (11). TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/289A (12 – 15), two of the most common mechanisms of azole resistance found in clinical isolates across the world (9), diminish growth-hampering, antifungal effects by azoles at least, in part, by overexpressing cyp51A. TR34 and TR46 (14, 15) as well as the less common TR53 and TR120 (16, 17) illustrate tandem repeats (TRs) in the cyp51A promoter that contain duplications of binding sites for its transcriptional activators SrbA and AtrR (18 – 22). In vitro studies using recombinant strains demonstrated that increased expression of cyp51A caused by TR34, TR46 or high-expressing constitutive promoters, is limited to approximately 2- to 4-fold (12, 13, 15, 23). In this regard, it has to be mentioned that cytochrome P450 enzymes such as sterol C14-demethylase Cyp51A require two electrons for their catalytic activity that are provided by redox partners such as the NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR) and/or cytochrome b 5, which is part of the cytochrome b 5 reductase (CB5R) system (24, 25) (Fig. 1). Through the NADPH-connected electron transport chain, it was originally proposed that P450 enzymes receive the electrons that are critical for their enzymatic activity via two single electron steps from NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase. Cytochrome b 5 was also suggested to provide electrons, however, only the second in this cycle (26). Later, work on Cyp51-based azole sensitivity in yeast revealed cytochrome P450 reductase as the main, but not only factor providing the two electrons for Cyp51 activity (27) as overexpression of the cytochrome b 5 encoding gene CYB5 could increase ketoconazole resistance in a CPR-deficient background (28). This led to the hypothesis that both necessary electrons for Cyp51 activity can be delivered by the CB5R system, which was confirmed soon after (25). Based on the necessity of sufficient electron supply for P450 enzymatic activity, it is somewhat not surprising that the increase in cyp51A transcript or protein content does not fully correlate with the level of resistance. The A. fumigatus genome encodes two putative CPRs, CprA (AFUB_077020) and CprB (AFUB_023960), as well as the cytochrome b 5 CybE (AFUB_021740) which together with NADH cytochrome b 5 reductase constitutes the CB5R system in this fungus (29).
Fig 1.
Proposed electron transfer path from NADPH and NADH by cytochrome P450 reductase and cytochrome b 5 to cytochrome P450 enzymes in A. fumigatus. Black arrows illustrate the delivery of electrons. Green arrows indicate the consequent positive impact on ergosterol biosynthesis and azole resistance.
In this work, we studied the consequences of overexpression of each component cprA, cprB, and cybE during simultaneous upregulation of cyp51A on A. fumigatus resistance to triazole-based sterol C14-demethylase inhibitors (further called azoles) of medical (voriconazole, VRZ; itraconazole, ITZ; isavuconazole, ISZ) and agricultural (tebuconazole, TBZ; epoxiconazole, EPZ) importance (1, 30, 31). For the conditional expression mutant displaying the highest degree of azole resistance, sterol measurements were carried out to monitor the impact of its increased activity on the turnover of eburicol, substrate of Cyp51A, as well as ergosterol. We further conditionally expressed the candidate in a recipient strain carrying a cyp51A allele with TR34 in its promoter, to assess the consequences of increased activity of the Cyp51A redox partner during TR-driven upregulation of cyp51A.
RESULTS
Combined overexpression of cyp51A and cprA leads to high levels of azole resistance
Similar to the clinically relevant tandem repeat mutations found in TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A (12, 13, 15), it has been demonstrated that overexpression of cyp51A increases resistance to azoles, however, only to a certain extent (23). Based on previous work that focused on CPR and cytochrome b 5 (25, 27 – 29, 32, 33), we speculated that a shortage of Cyp51A redox partners could be rate-limiting in this scenario. To test this hypothesis, we overexpressed cyp51A (strain cyp51APxylP ) together with cprA (strain cprAcyp51AbiPxylP ) and cprB (strain cprBcyp51AbiPxylP ) as well as cybE (strain cybEcyp51AbiPxylP ), utilizing the bidirectional, xylose-inducible promoter PxylP (34, 35). Susceptibilities of strains (Fig. 2) to different azoles were monitored during non-inducing (−xylose) and inducing (+xylose) conditions (Table 1). In comparison to wild type (wt), overexpression of cyp51A on its own raised minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) levels 2- to 4-fold to VRZ, ITZ, ISZ, TBZ, and EPZ. While increased expression of cprB and cybE together with cyp51A elevated resistance only marginally in comparison with cyp51APxylP only, concomitant upregulation of cyp51A and cprA led to a ≥8-fold increase in resistance to all compounds tested. To assess the influence of increased cprA expression on its own, we generated the strain cprAPxylP carrying a PxylP-driven cprA copy. Upregulation of cprA elevated MICs similar to that observed for induction of cyp51A only.
Fig 2.
Scheme of strains carrying tunable gene variants of cyp51A and its potential redox partners. Constructs comprising gene cassettes with PxylP-driven cyp51A (cyp51APxylP ) and cprA (cprAPxylP ) as well as cyp51A in combination with cprA (cprAcyp51AbiPxylP ), cprB (cprBcyp51AbiPxylP ), and cybE (cybEcyp51AbiPxylP ) under bidirectional (biPxylP) control of PxylP (35) were site-directed integrated at the counterselectable marker locus fcyB (36).
TABLE 1.
MIC values of strains carrying tunable gene variants of cyp51A as well as its potential redox partners a
| VRZ MIC (µg/mL) | ITZ MIC (µg/mL) | ISZ MIC (µg/mL) | TBZ MIC (µg/mL) | EPZ MIC (µg/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −xyl | + xyl | −xyl | + xyl | −xyl | + xyl | −xyl | + xyl | −xyl | + xyl | |
| A1160P+ (wt) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0,5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| cyp51APxylP | 0.25 | 0.5–1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 16 |
| cprAcyp51AbiPxylP | 0.25 | 2–4 | 0.5 | >16 | 0.5 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 4 | >16 |
| cprBcyp51AbiPxylP | 0.25 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 16 |
| cybEcyp51AbiPxylP | 0.25 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 16 |
| cprAPxylP | 0.25 | 0.5–1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 16 |
Voriconazole (VRZ), itraconazole (ITZ), isavuconazole (ISZ), tebuconazole (TBZ), and epoxiconazole (EPZ) susceptibilities of strains were analyzed following the broth microdilution method according to EUCAST (37). Strains were grown in the presence (+xyl) and absence (−xyl) of 1% xylose.
Overexpression of cprA leads to increased eburicol turnover and elevates ergosterol levels during voriconazole treatment
The high level of resistance of the strain carrying cprAcyp51AbiPxylP suggests that this strain harbors significantly increased Cyp51A activity during PxylP-inducing conditions. To monitor the corresponding effects on sterol C14-demethylation and ergosterol biosynthesis, we analyzed the impact of individual and combined overexpression of cyp51A and cprA on the sterol pattern with focus on the turnover of the Cyp51A substrate eburicol and the final product ergosterol, in the presence and absence of VRZ which is employed as a first-line treatment against invasive aspergillosis (1). Under non-inducing conditions, eburicol and ergosterol levels in wt were 0.6% and 92.4% relative to the total sterol content, respectively (Fig. 3, for details, see Table S3). VRZ exposure led to an increase of eburicol to 17.1% and reduction of ergosterol to 76.5%. Similar levels of eburicol (17.1%–17.6%) and ergosterol (76.0%–76.5%) were detected in the tunable mutant strains without induction. In agreement with their potential contribution to Cyp51A-mediated sterol C14-demethylation, induction of either cprA or cyp51A decreased the eburicol content (cprAPxylP : 10.4%; cyp51APxylP : 5.8%) and increased ergosterol levels (cprAPxylP : 82.7%; cyp51APxylP : 86.8%). This effect was most pronounced in cprAcyp51AbiPxylP . During simultaneous overexpression of both genes, eburicol levels were reduced to 3.2% and ergosterol levels were increased to 89.2%.
Fig 3.
Relative amounts of (A) eburicol and (B) ergosterol in conditional expression strains in the presence (+VRZ) and absence of voriconazole (−VRZ). Strains were grown in liquid AMM during inducing (+xyl) and non-inducing (−xyl) conditions. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of the respective samples.
Overexpression of cprA in strains carrying cyp51A TR34 alleles potentiates resistance to azoles
Similar to PxylP-induced upregulation of cyp51A, TR34 leads to elevated cyp51A expression and as a result increased azole resistance (13, 15). Our data suggest that additional mutations that elevate CprA activity could further elevate azole resistance in clinical isolates that carry TRs causing increased cyp51A expression. To test this idea, a mutant carrying a cyp51A allele with the TR34 mutation in its promoter (cyp51ATR34 ) was generated and subsequently equipped with the tunable cprA expression cassette (cyp51ATR34cprAPxylP , Fig. 4). The strain cyp51ATR34/L98H harboring the combined cyp51A mutation TR34/L98H, resembling one of the most common alleles conferring clinical pan-azole resistance, served as high azole resistance control. As a further reference, strain cyp51AWT (21) carrying a non-mutated cyp51A allele was employed which displayed wt-like azole susceptibilities (Table 2). Depending on the compound tested, cyp51ATR34 and cyp51ATR34/L98H showed an increase in the MICs of 2- to ≥4-fold and 8- to ≥32-fold, respectively. Similar to cyp51ATR34 , overexpression of cprA on its own (cyp51AWTcprAPxylP ) increased resistance 2- to 4-fold. In combination with the TR34-allele (cyp51ATR34cprAPxylP ), induction of cprA elevated MIC levels of the different azoles 8- to ≥32-fold, resembling a similar level of resistance than that observed for cyp51ATR34/L98H .
Fig 4.
Strains carrying the clinically relevant mutation TR34 and/or the xylose inducible cprA. wt and resistance-conferring cyp51A alleles were inserted at the cyp51A locus in a cyp51A deletion background. The inducible cprA construct was integrated in cyp51A WT (non-mutated reference allele) and cyp51ATR34 at the fcyB locus (36). * denotes TR34 and/or the L98H mutation in the promoter and coding sequence of cyp51A, respectively.
TABLE 2.
MIC values of strains with the clinically relevant mutation TR34 and/or the xylose inducible cprA a
| VRZ MIC (µg/mL) | ITZ MIC (µg/mL) | ISZ MIC (µg/mL) | TBZ MIC (µg/mL) | EPZ MIC (µg/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −xyl | + xyl | −xyl | + xyl | −xyl | + xyl | −xyl | + xyl | −xyl | + xyl | |
| cyp51A WT | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 4–8 | 4–8 |
| cyp51ATR34 | 1 | 1 | 1–2 | 1–2 | 2 | 1–2 | 4 | 4 | >16 | >16 |
| cyp51AWTcprAPxylP | 0.25 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 16 |
| cyp51ATR34cprAPxylP | 1 | 4 | 1–2 | >16 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 16 | >16 | >16 |
| cyp51ATR34/L98H | 2–4 | 2–4 | >16 | >16 | 4–8 | 4 | 16 | 16 | >16 | >16 |
Voriconazole (VRZ), itraconazole (ITZ), isavuconazole (ISZ), tebuconazole (TBZ), and epoxiconazole (EPZ) susceptibilities of strains were analyzed following the broth microdilution method according to EUCAST (37). Strains were grown in the presence (+xyl) and absence (−xyl) of 1% xylose.
DISCUSSION
Members of the sterol C14-demethylase Cyp51 family are highly conserved among eukaryotes and one of the best-studied cytochrome P450 enzymes in fungi (38, 39). Cyp51 enzymes in pathogenic fungi are of particular interest for antifungal therapy, as one of the most used antifungal drug classes in clinical treatment, the azoles, target this enzyme (40). The future clinical use of azoles has been challenged over the past years by a dramatic rise in resistance (6, 7). Hence, increasing our knowledge on mechanisms that confer resistance is crucial for the adaptation and optimization of current therapeutic approaches. As stated above, upregulation of cyp51A is a key characteristic of TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A that contributes to pan-azole resistance (12, 13, 15). In this work, we aimed to elucidate the main redox partner of Cyp51A that might limit azole resistance in A. fumigatus. The candidates investigated included CprA and CprB as well as CybE (29, 41). We overexpressed the respective genes together with cyp51A using the bidirectional promoter PxylP (35) and unveiled CprA as the major factor contributing to Cyp51A-driven azole resistance. Upregulation of cprA on its own already led to a moderate increase in resistance to the different azoles tested (2- to 4-fold), which suggests that at least during azole treatment, CprA activity is limiting for Cyp51A activity. The combined overexpression of cprA and cyp51A elevated MIC levels for all medical azole compounds above the clinical breakpoints suggested by EUCAST (42).
With regard to the distinctive role of CprA in this context, it has to be mentioned that A. fumigatus is predicted to express 77 cytochrome P450 enzymes and each CprA, CprB, and CybE might have different specificities for the individual P450 enzymes (29, 41, 43) that have yet to be characterized. Despite the fact that co-overexpression of cybE and cyp51A did not have a major impact on azole resistance when compared to overexpression of cyp51A only (Table 1), previous work demonstrated that the absence of CybE leads to an accumulation of eburicol, a decrease in ergosterol and, in line, increased VRZ susceptibility (29). Moreover, its loss led to a compensatory upregulation of cyp51A and cprA gene expression (29). Therefore, CybE might not be a rate-limiting factor to elevate azole resistance during cyp51A overexpression, but the reduced eburicol turnover in a cybE null mutant clearly suggests a crucial role of this component to maintain wt-like sterol C14-demethylation.
The present study suggests that increased activity of the Cyp51A redox partner CprA can further elevate azole resistance during cyp51A overexpression. Thus, mutations elevating its activity, e.g., cprA promoter mutations or those affecting transcription factors that lead to upregulation of the gene, could cause an unfavorable increase azole resistance during treatment, particularly in strains with preceding mutations that lead to cyp51A upregulation such as the abovementioned TRs. In this regard, it is interesting to note that a previously identified clinically resistant isolate carrying TR53, did not contain mutations within the cyp51A coding sequence (16). Its level of resistance could not be explained by the TR mutation on its own but rather resulted from extracistronic alterations such as modification of cprA. Testing a similar scenario, we overexpressed cprA in the strain containing TR34 in the cyp51A promoter, which raised resistance to different azoles 4- to ≥8-fold (compare strain cyp51ATR34 with cyp51ATR34cprAPxylP , Table 2).
Collectively, as already indicated in previous work (27, 44 – 46) and further corroborated by this work, we anticipate that inhibitors of CPRs could serve as promising synergistic compounds to counteract azole resistance or to decrease the azole concentrations required for treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration
MIC analyses were performed according to the EUCAST broth microdilution method (37). To induce PxylP-driven expression of genes, 1% xylose was supplemented to the medium. Azole compounds used in this study were VRZ, ITZ, ISZ, EPZ, and TBZ (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MI, USA).
Generation of plasmids and fungal transformation
Oligonucleotides, strains, and plasmids used in this work are displayed in Tables S1 and S2; Fig. S1, respectively. Generally, to assemble DNA fragments with the plasmid backbones, the NEBuilder HiFi DNA assembly Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) was used. Plasmids containing inducible expression cassettes of cyp51A only as well as its combination with cprA, cprB, and cybE were constructed as follows. First, the plasmid pΔfcyB_cyp51A PxylP was generated carrying cyp51A under control of PxylP. Prior to assembly, the PxylP-cyp51A expression cassette was amplified from pΔfcyA_cyp51A PxylP (47) using primers pX-cass-FW/RV, the backbone allowing integration of the linearized plasmid at the counterselectable marker locus fcyB from plasmid pfcyB using primers BBdel-FW/RV (36). To generate bidirectional expression constructs, a backbone was generated by amplifying the plasmid pΔfcyB_cyp51A PxylP with primers bixylP-BB-FW/RV. cprA, cprB, and cybE coding sequences including 500–800 bp 3′ non-translated region were amplified from genomic DNA employing primers cprAbixylP-FW/RV, cprBbixylP-FW/RV, and cybEbixylP-FW/RV, respectively. Subsequently, the backbone and each component were assembled giving rise to pΔfcyB_cprAcyp51A biPxylP , pΔfcyB_cprBcyp51A biPxylP, and pΔfcyB_cybEcyp51A biPxylP . For single overexpression of cprA, the coding sequence was amplified from genomic DNA using cprAxylP-FW/RV. The fragment was then assembled with a backbone amplified from pΔfcyB_cyp51A PxylP using primers pX-FW.2/RV.2 yielding plasmid pΔfcyB_cprA PxylP . The plasmid pcyp51ATR34, comprising TR34 within the cyp51A promoter, was created with the plasmid pcyp51AWT (21) using a DNA duplex. Therefore, 50 µM of each primer 34mer-FW/RV was mixed and annealed by denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min and gradually cooling to room temperature. Subsequently, the duplex was phosphorylated with T4 Polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Next, the pcyp51AWT plasmid was linearized with cyp51A-TR-BB-FW/RV and ligated with the phosphorylated primer-duplex using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). The L98H point mutation was introduced into pcyp51ATR34 with primers cyp51A-L98H-FW/RV giving rise to pcyp51ATR34/L98H.
With the exception of pcyp51ATR34 and pcyp51ATR34/L98H, plasmids were NotI-linearized and transformed into A1160P+ (48), here referred to as wt, resulting in site-directed integrated at the marker locus fcyB (47). pcyp51ATR34 and pcyp51ATR34/L98H were KpnI-linearized and transformed into ∆cyp51A, which led to site-specific integration at the cyp51A deletion locus as described recently for pcyp51AWT (21). The resulting strains were designated cyp51ATR34 and cyp51ATR34/L98H. cyp51ATR34 and its reference strain cyp51AWT were further transformed with pΔfcyB_cprA PxylP giving rise to cyp51ATR34cprAPxylP and cyp51AWTcprAPxylP .
Fungal transformation of plasmids targeting the fcyB and cyp51A loci was carried out as previously described (21, 36). Correct integrations of constructs were validated by Southern blot analysis.
Sterol measurements
Sterol analysis of wt, cyp51APxylP , cprAPxylP, and cprAcyp51AbiPxylP was performed in triplicates in AMM (49) containing 1% glucose and 20 mM ammonium tartrate as carbon and nitrogen source, respectively. The xylanase promoter was induced with 1% xylose, and VRZ was used in a final concentration of 0.02 µg/mL. Cultures were inoculated with 1 × 106 spores/mL and incubated at 37 °C for 20 h at 200 rpm. Mycelia were harvested by filtration, shock-frozen, and lyophilized. Subsequently, freeze-dried mycelia were pulverized.
Sterol extraction was performed according to Müller et al. (50) using 6 mg freeze-dried mycelia. As described by Müller et al. (51), sterols were analyzed as their corresponding trimethylsilyl (TMS) ethers using GC-MS. The individual sterol TMS ethers were identified by their relative retention times (RRT) as well as their specific mass spectra. In total, 12 sterols were detected (for details, see Table S3), and the base peak of each sterol TMS ether was taken as a quantifier ion for calculating the peak areas: cholestane (internal standard, IS) m/z 217, RRT 1.00; ergosta-5,8,22-trien-3β-ol (lichesterol) m/z 363, RRT 1.29; ergosta-5,7,22-trien-3β-ol (ergosterol) m/z 363, RRT 1.32; ergosta-7,22-dien-3β-ol (5-dihydroergosterol) m/z 343, RRT 1.34; ergosta-5,7,22,24(28)-tetraen-3β-ol m/z 466, RRT 1.35; ergosta-7,22,24(28)-trien-3β-ol m/z 343, RRT 1.37; ergosta-5,7,24(28)-trien-3β-ol (5-dehydroepisterol) m/z 363, RRT 1.38; ergosta-5,7-dien-3β-ol m/z 365, RRT 1.40; ergosta-7,24(28)-dien-3β-ol (episterol) m/z 343, RRT 1.40; 4,4,14-trimethylcholesta-8,24(28)-dien-3β-ol (lanosterol) m/z 343, RRT 1.43; 4-methylergosta-8,24(28)-dien-3β-ol (4-methylfecosterol) m/z 379, RRT 1.45; 4,4,14-trimetylergosta-8,24(28)-dien-3β-ol (eburicol) m/z 407, RRT 1.49; 4,4-dimethylergosta-8,24(28)-dien-3β-ol m/z 408, RRT 1.51.
For quantification, an external calibration with ergosterol TMS ether was used. The relative sterol levels were determined by plotting the amount of each sterol against the total amount of sterols found in one sample (52).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project has received funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (grant P35951 to F.G.)
Contributor Information
Fabio Gsaller, Email: Fabio.Gsaller@i-med.ac.at.
Andreas H. Groll, University Children's Hospital, Münster, Münster, Germany
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00918-23.
The file contains all supplemental Tables and Figures mentioned in the manuscript.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Ullmann AJ, Aguado JM, Arikan-Akdagli S, Denning DW, Groll AH, Lagrou K, Lass-Flörl C, Lewis RE, Munoz P, Verweij PE, Warris A, Ader F, Akova M, Arendrup MC, Barnes RA, Beigelman-Aubry C, Blot S, Bouza E, Brüggemann RJM, Buchheidt D, Cadranel J, Castagnola E, Chakrabarti A, Cuenca-Estrella M, Dimopoulos G, Fortun J, Gangneux J-P, Garbino J, Heinz WJ, Herbrecht R, Heussel CP, Kibbler CC, Klimko N, Kullberg BJ, Lange C, Lehrnbecher T, Löffler J, Lortholary O, Maertens J, Marchetti O, Meis JF, Pagano L, Ribaud P, Richardson M, Roilides E, Ruhnke M, Sanguinetti M, Sheppard DC, Sinkó J, Skiada A, Vehreschild MJGT, Viscoli C, Cornely OA. 2018. Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline. Clin Microbiol Infect 24 Suppl 1:e1–e38. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Patterson TF, Thompson GR, Denning DW, Fishman JA, Hadley S, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Nguyen MH, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, Walsh TJ, Wingard JR, Young J-A, Bennett JE. 2016. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Aspergillosis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 63:433–442. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Earle K, Valero C, Conn DP, Vere G, Cook PC, Bromley MJ, Bowyer P, Gago S. 2023. Pathogenicity and virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus. Virulence 14:2172264. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2023.2172264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. World Health Organization . 2022. Fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240060241
- 5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2018. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest-threats.html
- 6. Verweij PE, Lucas JA, Arendrup MC, Bowyer P, Brinkmann AJF, Denning DW, Dyer PS, Fisher MC, Geenen PL, Gisi U, Hermann D, Hoogendijk A, Kiers E, Lagrou K, Melchers WJG, Rhodes J, Rietveld AG, Schoustra SE, Stenzel K, Zwaan BJ, Fraaije BA. 2020. The one health problem of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: current insights and future research agenda. Fung Biol Rev 34:202–214. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2020.10.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Meis JF, Chowdhary A, Rhodes JL, Fisher MC, Verweij PE. 2016. Clinical implications of globally emerging azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 371:20150460. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Nywening AV, Rybak JM, Rogers PD, Fortwendel JR. 2020. Mechanisms of triazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Environ Microbiol 22:4934–4952. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Garcia-Rubio R, Cuenca-Estrella M, Mellado E. 2017. Triazole resistance in Aspergillus species: an emerging problem. Drugs 77:599–613. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0714-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hortschansky P, Misslinger M, Morl J, Gsaller F, Bromley MJ, Brakhage AA, Groll M, Haas H, Huber EM. 2020. Structural basis of HapE(P88L)-linked antifungal triazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Life Sci Alliance 3. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202000729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Dhingra S, Cramer RA. 2017. Regulation of sterol biosynthesis in the human fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus: opportunities for therapeutic development. Front Microbiol 8:92. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Snelders E, Camps SMT, Karawajczyk A, Rijs AJMM, Zoll J, Verweij PE, Melchers WJG. 2015. Genotype-phenotype complexity of the TR46/Y121F/T289A cyp51A azole resistance mechanism in Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal Genet Biol 82:129–135. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Snelders E, Karawajczyk A, Verhoeven RJA, Venselaar H, Schaftenaar G, Verweij PE, Melchers WJG. 2011. The structure-function relationship of the Aspergillus fumigatus cyp51A L98H conversion by site-directed mutagenesis: the mechanism of L98H azole resistance. Fungal Genet Biol 48:1062–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. van der Linden JWM, Camps SMT, Kampinga GA, Arends JPA, Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, Haas PJA, Rijnders BJA, Kuijper EJ, van Tiel FH, Varga J, Karawajczyk A, Zoll J, Melchers WJG, Verweij PE. 2013. Aspergillosis due to voriconazole highly resistant Aspergillus fumigatus and recovery of genetically related resistant isolates from domiciles. Clin Infect Dis 57:513–520. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mellado E, Garcia-Effron G, Alcázar-Fuoli L, Melchers WJG, Verweij PE, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodríguez-Tudela JL. 2007. A new Aspergillus fumigatus resistance mechanism conferring in vitro cross-resistance to azole antifungals involves a combination of cyp51A alterations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:1897–1904. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01092-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hodiamont CJ, Dolman KM, Ten Berge IJM, Melchers WJG, Verweij PE, Pajkrt D. 2009. Multiple-azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus osteomyelitis in a patient with chronic granulomatous disease successfully treated with long-term oral posaconazole and surgery. Med Mycol 47:217–220. doi: 10.1080/13693780802545600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hare RK, Gertsen JB, Astvad KMT, Degn KB, Løkke A, Stegger M, Andersen PS, Kristensen L, Arendrup MC. 2019. In vivo selection of a unique tandem repeat mediated azole resistance mechanism (TR120) in Aspergillus fumigatus cyp51A, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis 25:577–580. doi: 10.3201/eid2503.180297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gsaller F, Hortschansky P, Furukawa T, Carr PD, Rash B, Capilla J, Müller C, Bracher F, Bowyer P, Haas H, Brakhage AA, Bromley MJ. 2016. Sterol biosynthesis and azole tolerance is governed by the opposing actions of SrbA and the CCAAT binding complex. PLoS Pathog. 12:e1006106. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hagiwara D, Miura D, Shimizu K, Paul S, Ohba A, Gonoi T, Watanabe A, Kamei K, Shintani T, Moye-Rowley WS, Kawamoto S, Gomi K. 2017. A novel Zn2-Cys6 transcription factor AtrR plays a key role in an azole resistance mechanism of Aspergillus fumigatus by co-regulating cyp51A and cdr1B expressions. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006096. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Paul S, Stamnes M, Thomas GH, Liu H, Hagiwara D, Gomi K, Filler SG, Moye-Rowley WS. 2019. AtrR is an essential determinant of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. mBio 10:e02563-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02563-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kühbacher A, Peiffer M, Hortschansky P, Merschak P, Bromley MJ, Haas H, Brakhage AA, Gsaller F. 2022. Azole resistance-associated regulatory motifs within the promoter of cyp51A in Aspergillus fumigatus. Microbiol Spectr 10:e0120922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01209-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Paul S, Verweij PE, Melchers WJG, Moye-Rowley WS, Goldman GH. 2022. Differential functions of individual transcription factor binding sites in the tandem repeats found in clinically relevant cyp51A promoters in Aspergillus fumigatus. mBio 13:e0070222. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00702-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Rybak JM, Ge WB, Wiederhold NP, Parker JE, Kelly SL, Rogers PD, Fortwendel JR. 2019. Mutations in hmg1, challenging the paradigm of clinical triazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. mBio 10:e00437-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00437-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. van den Brink HM, van Gorcom RF, van den Hondel CA, Punt PJ. 1998. Cytochrome P450 enzyme systems in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 23:1–17. doi: 10.1006/fgbi.1997.1021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lamb DC, Kelly DE, Manning NJ, Kaderbhai MA, Kelly SL. 1999. Biodiversity of the P450 catalytic cycle: yeast cytochrome b5/NADH cytochrome b5 reductase complex efficiently drives the entire sterol 14-demethylation (CYP51) reaction. FEBS Lett 462:283–288. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01548-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Black SD, Coon MJ. 1987. P-450 cytochromes: structure and function. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 60:35–87. doi: 10.1002/9780470123065.ch2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sutter TR, Loper JC. 1989. Disruption of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene for NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase causes increased sensitivity to ketoconazole. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 160:1257–1266. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(89)80139-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Truan G, Epinat JC, Rougeulle C, Cullin C, Pompon D. 1994. Cloning and characterization of a yeast cytochrome b5-encoding gene which suppresses ketoconazole hypersensitivity in a NADPH-P-450 reductase-deficient strain. Gene 142:123–127. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90366-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Misslinger M, Gsaller F, Hortschansky P, Müller C, Bracher F, Bromley MJ, Haas H. 2017. The cytochrome b5 CybE is regulated by iron availability and is crucial for azole resistance in A. fumigatus. Metallomics 9:1655–1665. doi: 10.1039/c7mt00110j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Jørgensen LN, Heick TM. 2021. Azole use in agriculture, Horticulture, and wood preservation - is it indispensable? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:730297. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.730297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Schoustra SE, Debets AJM, Rijs AJMM, Zhang J, Snelders E, Leendertse PC, Melchers WJG, Rietveld AG, Zwaan BJ, Verweij PE. 2019. Environmental hotspots for azole resistance selection of Aspergillus fumigatus, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 25:1347–1353. doi: 10.3201/eid2507.181625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. van den Brink HJ, van Nistelrooy HJ, de Waard MA, van den Hondel CA, van Gorcom RF. 1996. Increased resistance to 14α-demethylase inhibitors (DMIs) in Aspergillus niger by coexpression of the Penicillium italicum eburicol 14 α-demethylase (cyp51) and the A. niger cytochrome P450 reductase (cprA) genes. J Biotechnol 49:13–18. doi: 10.1016/0168-1656(96)01403-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Keniya MV, Ruma YN, Tyndall JDA, Monk BC. 2018. Heterologous expression of full-length lanosterol 14α-demethylases of prominent fungal pathogens Candida albicans and Candida glabrata provides tools for antifungal discovery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01131-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01131-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zadra I, Abt B, Parson W, Haas H. 2000. xylP promoter-based expression system and its use for antisense downregulation of the Penicillium chrysogenum nitrogen regulator NRE. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4810–4816. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.11.4810-4816.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Yap A, Glarcher I, Misslinger M, Haas H. 2022. Characterization and engineering of the xylose-inducible xylP promoter for use in mold fungal species. Metab Eng Commun 15:e00214. doi: 10.1016/j.mec.2022.e00214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Birštonas L, Dallemulle A, López-Berges MS, Jacobsen ID, Offterdinger M, Abt B, Straßburger M, Bauer I, Schmidt O, Sarg B, Lindner H, Haas H, Gsaller F. 2020. Multiplex genetic engineering exploiting pyrimidine salvage pathway-based endogenous counterselectable markers. mBio 11:e00230-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00230-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Guinea J, Meletiadis J, Arikan-Akdagli S, Muehlethaler K, Kahlmeter G, Arendrup MC, Eucast A. 2022. EUCAST definitive document EDef 9.4: method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for conidia forming moulds EDef 9.4. EUCAST-AFST. [Google Scholar]
- 38. van den Brink H (J.) M, van Gorcom RFM, van den Hondel CAMJJ, Punt PJ. 1998. Cytochrome P450 enzyme systems in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 23:1–17. doi: 10.1006/fgbi.1997.1021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Geisler K, Hughes RK, Sainsbury F, Lomonossoff GP, Rejzek M, Fairhurst S, Olsen CE, Motawia MS, Melton RE, Hemmings AM, Bak S, Osbourn A. 2013. Biochemical analysis of a multifunctional cytochrome P450 (cyp51) enzyme required for synthesis of antimicrobial triterpenes in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:E3360–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309157110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Teixeira MM, Carvalho DT, Sousa E, Pinto E. 2022. New antifungal agents with azole moieties. Pharmaceuticals 15:1427. doi: 10.3390/ph15111427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kelly DE, Krasevec N, Mullins J, Nelson DR. 2009. The CYPome (cytochrome P450 complement) of Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet Biol 46 Suppl 1:S53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Guinea J. 2020. Updated EUCAST clinical breakpoints against Aspergillus, implications for the clinical microbiology laboratory. J Fungi (Basel) 6:343. doi: 10.3390/jof6040343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Park J, Lee S, Choi J, Ahn K, Park B, Park J, Kang S, Lee YH. 2008. Fungal cytochrome P450 database. BMC Genomics 9:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. He D, Feng Z, Gao S, Wei Y, Han S, Wang L. 2021. Contribution of NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase to azole resistance in Fusarium oxysporum. Front Microbiol 12:709942. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.709942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Zhang X, Fang Y, Jaiseng W, Hu L, Lu Y, Ma Y, Furuyashiki T. 2015. Characterization of tamoxifen as an antifungal agent using the yeast schizosaccharomyces pombe model organism. Kobe J Med Sci 61:E54–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Liu Q, Guo X, Jiang G, Wu G, Miao H, Liu K, Chen S, Sakamoto N, Kuno T, Yao F, Fang Y. 2020. NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase Ccr1 is a target of tamoxifen and participates in its antifungal activity via regulating cell wall integrity in fission yeast. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00079-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Baldin C, Kühbacher A, Merschak P, Wagener J, Gsaller F. 2022. Modular inducible multigene expression system for filamentous fungi. Microbiol Spectr 10:e0367022. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03670-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Fraczek MG, Bromley M, Buied A, Moore CB, Rajendran R, Rautemaa R, Ramage G, Denning DW, Bowyer P. 2013. The cdr1B efflux transporter is associated with non-cyp51A-mediated itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:1486–1496. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Pontecorvo G, Roper JA, Hemmons LM, Macdonald KD, Bufton AWJ. 1953. The genetics of Aspergillus-nidulans. Advanc Genet Incorporat Mol Genet Med 5:141–238. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60408-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Müller C, Staudacher V, Krauss J, Giera M, Bracher F. 2013. A convenient cellular assay for the identification of the molecular target of ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors and quantification of their effects on total ergosterol biosynthesis. Steroids 78:483–493. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2013.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Müller C, Binder U, Bracher F, Giera M. 2017. Antifungal drug testing by combining minimal inhibitory concentration testing with target identification by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 12:947–963. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Müller C, Neugebauer T, Zill P, Lass-Flörl C, Bracher F, Binder U. 2018. Sterol composition of clinically relevant mucorales and changes resulting from posaconazole treatment. Molecules 23:1218. doi: 10.3390/molecules23051218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
The file contains all supplemental Tables and Figures mentioned in the manuscript.




