ABSTRACT
Drug resistance to commercially available antimalarials is a major obstacle in malaria control and elimination, creating the need to find new antiparasitic compounds with novel mechanisms of action. The success of kinase inhibitors for oncological treatments has paved the way for the exploitation of protein kinases as drug targets in various diseases, including malaria. Casein kinases are ubiquitous serine/threonine kinases involved in a wide range of cellular processes such as mitotic checkpoint signaling, DNA damage response, and circadian rhythm. In Plasmodium, it is suggested that these protein kinases are essential for both asexual and sexual blood-stage parasites, reinforcing their potential as targets for multi-stage antimalarials. To identify new putative PfCK2α inhibitors, we utilized an in silico chemogenomic strategy involving virtual screening with docking simulations and quantitative structure-activity relationship predictions. Our investigation resulted in the discovery of a new quinazoline molecule (542), which exhibited potent activity against asexual blood stages and a high selectivity index (>100). Subsequently, we conducted chemical-genetic interaction analysis on yeasts with mutations in casein kinases. Our chemical-genetic interaction results are consistent with the hypothesis that 542 inhibits yeast Cka1, which has a hinge region with high similarity to PfCK2α. This finding is in agreement with our in silico results suggesting that 542 inhibits PfCK2α via hinge region interaction.
KEYWORDS: malaria, antimalarials, virtual screening, docking, quinazoline
INTRODUCTION
Malaria is an ancient parasitic disease characterized by high intermittent fevers. The disease results from infection by protozoa of the genus Plasmodium and transmitted to humans through the bite of female Anopheles mosquitoes. For thousands of years, malaria has been one of the most impactful public health problems in tropical and subtropical areas of the world. According to the latest World Malaria Report from the Word Health Organization, the malaria mortality rate decreased by about 50% between the period of 2000 and 2015, falling from 30 to 15 deaths per 100,000 people at risk. In the following years, mortality continued to fall but at a slower rate, reaching 13 deaths per 100,000 populations in 2019 (1). In 2020, however, the mortality rate rose again and fell back to the level observed 5 years earlier (1). The global decline in malaria cases and deaths over the last two decades can be attributed to vector control strategies, rapid diagnosis, and early treatment of patients. However, resistance to commonly used antimalarials and insecticides is a key factor contributing to the slower decline in malaria mortality in recent years (1). Hence, the development of additional antimalarial drugs is critical, especially those with novel biological targets.
Protein kinases have been studied as potential targets for the development of new drugs, as these proteins are important regulators of a variety of cellular process such as metabolism, proliferation, cell motility, apoptosis, and differentiation (2). Following genome sequencing and protein characterization of the primary malaria-causing species, at least 85 protein kinases have been identified in the Plasmodium kinome (3, 4). As most of these proteins have been shown to be essential to all stages of the Plasmodium life cycle, protein kinases have been highlighted as potential candidates for the development of prophylactic, curative, and transmission-blocking drugs. Today, several protein kinase inhibitors are under development as antimalarial drugs, with one molecule (MMV390048) in phase II trials (5).
Casein kinases are ubiquitous serine/threonine kinases that were first named based on their ability to phosphorylate casein in vitro. This family of kinases can be subdivided further into two groups: casein kinase 1 (CK1) and casein kinase 2 (CK2). CK1 is a small family within the kinome, with seven isoforms in mammals (α, β, γ1, γ2, γ3, δ, and ε) (6), displaying a highly conserved kinase domain. Members of this family are involved in a wide range of cellular processes such as mitotic checkpoint signaling (7), DNA damage response (8), Wnt signaling (9), and circadian rhythm (10). CK2 is a constitutively expressed serine/threonine protein kinase composed of two alpha catalytic (CK2α, encoded by CSNK21, and CK2α′, encoded by CSNK22) and two beta regulatory (CK2β and CK2β′) subunits and has been implicated in cell cycle regulation (11), apoptosis (12), and DNA repair (13).
Unlike the human tetrameric CK2, PfCK2 is formed by one single catalytic (α) and two regulatory (β1 and β2) subunits. The activation mechanism of PfCK2 also appears to be different from its human counterpart: PfCK2 undergoes autophosphorylation at Thr63, a residue located in domain I of the catalytic subdomain, but not at a conserved Tyr186, located within the activation loop (14). In vitro phosphorylation of chromatin proteins by PfCK2α, added to the wide distribution of this enzyme in the nucleus of parasite, indicates that PfCK2 is involved in chromatin assembly and dynamics (15). Failure to disrupt pfck2α using a reverse genetic approach suggests that this protein kinase is essential for the asexual blood stage of development (16, 17). Importantly, PfCK2 has recently been shown to be essential for both asexual and sexual blood-stage parasites, as conditional knockdown of PfCK2α prevented the transition of stage IV gametocytes into transmission-competent stage V parasites, reinforcing its potential as a target for multi-stage antimalarials (18).
Despite the importance of PfCK2 to the biological cycle of malaria parasites, no specific and potent inhibitor against this protein kinase has yet been reported. Although there is high sequence identity between parasite CK2 and their human counterpart, some marked differences in the protein structures could be favorable in the search for specific inhibitors. Recently, the crystal structure of PfCK2α complexed with ATP was solved, providing insights into the structural basis for inhibition. Some amino acid substitutions in the vicinity of where the adenine base binds promote changes in the ATP-binding pocket (19).
Here, we report a strategy for discovering new putative inhibitors of PfCK2α using an integrated structure- and ligand-based virtual screening with docking simulations through three-dimensional (3D) models of the protein’s structure predicted by AlphaFold and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for predicting antiplasmodial activity of the top-ranked virtual hits. Subsequently, 168 compounds were finally selected for experimental validation, and 11 of these compounds exhibited >50% inhibition of the growth of Plasmodium falciparum asexual blood-stage at 1 µM. Among the compounds, a quinazoline (542) presented the highest selectivity index (SI) and was chosen for chemical-genetic interaction assays for target validation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PfCK2α structural predictions
The structure of PfCK2 was available at the AlphaFold protein structure database (20). Quality assessment was performed using MolProbity Server (21).
Protein and ligand preparation
The chemical structures were retrieved from ChemBridge database (DiverSet, with approximately 50,000 compounds). Ligands were prepared using the LigPrep tool (Schrödinger Release 2019-4: LigPrep; Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY) with OPLS2005 force field. All possible ionization states were generated for each ligand at pH 7.5 ± 0.5 using Epik. The identification of protein binding sites is necessary to define the grid center for docking studies. Thus, we identified these sites with the KLIFS database (https://klifs.net/) (22), which provides information about the residues of the catalytic site of human kinases. By aligning the amino acid sequences of the orthologs with the Plasmodium kinases, we identified the active site of our target protein. The PockDrug web server (23) was used for the identification of pockets of the protein that are “druggable” (ability of a molecule to bind to a certain region of the protein) using geometry, hydrophobicity, and aromaticity as parameters (23). The modeled structure of the PfCK2 was imported using Protein Preparation Wizard tool (Schrödinger Release 2019-4: Protein Preparation Wizard; Schrödinger, LLC). First, hydrogen atoms were added, and protonation states were adjusted at pH 7.5. Finally, a system energy minimization was performed using the OPLS-2005 force field. The receptor grid was generated using the Receptor Grid Generation tool and centered at the ATP-binding site.
Virtual screening
Virtual screening was performed in three steps by using Glide software v.11.2. First, the data set was carefully curated via the following: exclusion of salts and metals, pKa normalization, Lipinski’s rule of 5 (24), Veber filter (25), and removal of undesirable properties, such as PAINS and aggregators, using the FILTER software (v.2.2.1, Openeye Scientific Software). Duplicates were detected and removed using ISIDA Duplicates (26). We screened all compounds via the high-throughput virtual screening (HTVS). In the next step, the compounds that presented the lowest docking scores from HTVS were evaluated by standard precision (SP) docking process. In the third stage, the top lowest docking score compounds from SP docking are retained and further evaluated using extra-precision docking to obtain the top molecules, which were ranked based on the lowest docking score. The Pymol software (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, v.1.2r3pre; Schrödinger, LLC) was used for the visual inspection of 3D docking poses and to help the identification of non-covalent interactions among proteins and ligands.
The top molecules were then submitted to QSAR models based on deep learning previously published by our group (27). Finally, the compounds predicted as actives against P. falciparum (3D7 models) were selected for experimental validation.
Drug activity assays against P. falciparum asexual blood stage
The P. falciparum chloroquine-sensitive (3D7) and multi-drug resistant (Dd2) strains used in this study were cultured at 4% hematocrit in type O + human red blood cells (Hematology Center of University of Campinas) and maintained at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 1% O2, 5% CO2, and 94% N2, in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium supplemented with 10% pooled A+ human serum (Hematology Center of University of Campinas) (28). Drug inhibition assays were performed as previously described (29). Briefly, D-sorbitol synchronized ring cultures (0.5% parasitemia and 2% hematocrit) (30) were plated in 96-well plates in the presence of different concentrations of the compounds (5.0–0.002 µM), in the drug vehicle dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). After 72 hours of incubation, parasitemia was assessed by fluorometry using SybrGreen fluorescent dye. EC50 values were calculated by plotting log dosing vs growth inhibition (expressed as percentage relative to the drug-free control).
Cytotoxicity assays in HepG-2 and MCF-7 cells
Cytotoxicity of compounds was assessed by PrestoBlue and MTT [3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium chloride] reduction assay for quantification of cellular reductase enzyme activity as an indirect measurement of cell viability using human epithelial breast cancer cell line (MCF-7), human hepatocarcinoma cell line (HepG-2), and fibroblast-like cell lines derived from monkey kidney tissue (COS-7 cells) (31). Briefly, cells were cultivated at 5% CO2 and 37°C using Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. For this experiment, cells were seeded at a density of 104 cells/well in a 96-well plate prior to incubation with a serial dilution of compounds of interest and controls for 24 hours (MCF-7 and HepG-2 cells) or 72 hours (HepG-2 and COS-7 cells). After drug treatment, MCF-7 or HepG-2 cells were next incubated with resazurin (PrestoBlue) for 1 hour followed by formation of resorufin by viable cell reductase enzymes (32). Fluorescence reading was measured by POLARstar Omega microplate-reader at 544-nm excitation and 590-nm emission. For HepG-2 and COS-7 cells after 72-hour drug treatment, MTT was added to the wells and absorbance reading was performed on a CLARIOstar plate reader (BGMtech) at a wavelength of 570 nm (OD570). Cellular viability was expressed as a percentage relative to vehicle treated control. The CC50 was defined as the concentration that reduced the fluorescence or absorbance of treated cells to 50% when compared to non-treated controls.
Yeast chemical-genetic interactions
Chemical-genetic interactions were investigated using haploid deletion strains from the commercial yeast deletion library (Yeast Knockout Collection Haploid Mat-a/Trans OMIC technologies). Strains selected for these assays were cka1Δ (deletion of the gene encoding the alpha catalytic subunit of casein kinase 2); cka2Δ (deletion of the gene encoding the alpha′ catalytic subunit of casein kinase 2); eap1Δ (deletion of the gene encoding the eIF4E-associated protein, which is has a positive genetic interaction with cka1Δ and a negative genetic interaction with cka2Δ); and his3Δ (wild-type control with the same antibiotic resistance markers as the test strains). Data for genetic interactions were taken from the Global Yeast Genetic Interaction Network (https://thecellmap.org/) (33). After preparing the YPD medium (1% Bacto yeast extract, 2% Bacto peptone, and 2% glucose), we grew individual strains at 30°C in 2.5 mL of YPD medium in 15-mL conical tubes until saturation. The yeast cultures were diluted to OD600 of 0.2 for chemical-genetic assays (2× final cell density). Compound 542 stored in DMSO at a concentration of 10,000 µM was diluted in the culture medium (YPD) with 2% glucose to a concentration of 100 µM. The same volume as DMSO was diluted in a culture medium used as the negative control. The OD of each strain was adjusted to 0.2. The experiment was conducted in a 384-well plate with a total volume of 70 µL in each well. The plate assembly was done to preserve the humidity of the environment, so the columns and external lines were filled with only culture medium, forming a humid environment and avoiding losses by evaporation. In the center, each strain was placed in triplicate for the control and compound 542. Each well was placed with 35 µL of culture with OD of 0.2 and 35 µL of the solution containing the compound 542 or DSMO as the negative control, forming a suspension with OD of 0.1- and 50.0-µM inhibitor concentration.
The findings of this study, which pertain to chemical-genetic interactions in Cka1 yeast, are backed by data that are openly accessible on the Mendeley Data public database at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/zc8kxkr5vh/1.
Human protein kinase selectivity panel
The human kinase selectivity panel used here is based on the displacement of a fluorescent tracer by competing test compounds. When the tracer binds to the kinase ATP-binding pocket, a high TR-FRET signal is obtained (excitation at 340 nm and emission at 665/615 nm). When test compounds compete with the fluorescent tracer for the kinase ATP-binding pocket, a lower TR-FRET signal is detected. Fluorescent tracers used were T236, T178, T199, T222, and T1710, all purchased from Thermo Fischer Scientific. Proteins in the selectivity panel were expressed in-house using plasmid pNIC-Bio3 for expression in Escherichia coli and pFB-Bio5 for expression in insect cells. These vectors introduced a C-terminal Avi-tag sequence for the lysine biotinylation (GLNDIFEAQKIEWHE) of the recombinant protein. For the expression in E. coli, each target kinase was co-expressed with BirA biotin ligase previously cloned into the plasmid pCDF-BirA, which confers resistance to spectinomycin. For Sf9 cells, the biotinylation was performed by a secreted BirA, which was co-expressed along with the target kinase. In both expression systems, 0.14-mM biotin was added to the cell culture medium. Purified, biotinylated kinases were incubated for an hour at room temperature with Eu-Streptavidin (Thermo Fisher, #PV6025), the appropriate fluorescent tracer containing Alexa Fluor-647, and the test compounds. Final concentrations used in the assay were protein, 15 nM; tested compounds, 1 µM; control inhibitors (staurosporine for T222 and T236, dasatinib for T178, and SB-202190 for T199), 10 µM. Data were collected using a ClarioStar plate reader (BMG LabTech) and normalized to 0–100% tracer bound based on negative (0% bound, 10-µM reference inhibitor) and positive (100% bound, DMSO only) controls.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Sequence analysis and alignment
The primary sequence of CK2α proteins was extracted from the UniProt database. Human CK2α and CK2α′ are highly conserved (88.5% identity), and the amino acid sequence alignments of Plasmodium casein kinases with their human closest orthologue showed high identity: 68.8% (PfCK2α to hCK2α) and 68.2% (PvCK2α to hCK2α). The sequence identity between PfCK2α and PvCK2α is 97%. Highly conserved regions among protein kinase subdomains are present in PfCK2α (Fig. 1). We can highlight the glycine-rich loop, characterized by the motif GXGXXG in subdomain I (the third glycine is substituted by a serine) and the invariant lysine in subdomain II, which interacts with the α-phosphate and β- phosphate of ATP. The glutamate in subdomain III, which forms a salt bridge with the invariant lysine of subdomain II, the catalytic loop HRDXXXXN in subdomain VIb, which contains the essential aspartate that is the catalytic residue acting as a base acceptor, are also overlapped in both sequences. Unlike other protein kinases, both human and parasite CK2α feature a DWG motif in the subdomain VII rather than a DFG motif: the glutamate and the arginine, localized in subdomains VIII and XI, respectively, which form a salt bound that provides structural stability of the C-terminal lobe, and the aspartate in subdomain IX, which forms hydrogen bonds with the backbone to stabilize the structural stability of the catalytic loop of subdomain VI (Fig. 1).
FIG 1.
Amino acid sequence alignment of protein kinase domains of CK2α sequences of P. falciparum and Plasmodium vivax with the homolog sequence in humans. Protein kinase domains were identified using Pfam database. Conserved residues are shown in blue. The 11 subdomains of the protein kinase domain are indicated with roman numerals. The arrows indicate amino acids highly conserved among protein kinase subdomains. The alignment was performed with CLC Sequence Viewer v. 8 (gap open cost 10, gap extension cost 1, end gap cost as any other). GK, gatekeeper.
PfCK2α three-dimensional modeling
Three-dimensional structures are needed to conduct docking calculations. By the time our studies took place, there was only one crystal structure resolved for PfCK2α (PDB ID: 5XVU) (19), corresponding to a D179S inactive mutant. Due to this mutation at the DWG motif of catalytic binding site, we used the PfCK2α 3D structure modeled with Asp179 instead of Ser179 that was deposited in the AlphaFold (20) protein structure database (https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/, ID = Q8IIR9). The per-residue confidence score (based on the predicted local-distance difference test) for most residues was very high (>90) and was only low (<60) in the N- and C-terminal regions. The statistical quality of the models was evaluated using MolProbity (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
MolProbity statistical quality of the final model of PfCK2α after refinement
| PfCK2α | |
|---|---|
| Clash score | 0.71 (99th percentile) a |
| Poor rotamers | 0 b |
| Favored rotamers | 305 (98.7%) c |
| Ramachandran outliers (%) | 0.3 d |
| Ramachandran favored (%) | 95.2 e |
| MolProbity score | 1.06 (100th percentile) a , f |
100th percentile is the best among structure of comparable resolution; 0th percentile is the worst.
Goal: <0.3%.
Goal: >98%.
Goal: <0.05%.
Goal: >98%.
MolProbity score combines the clash score, poor rotamers, and Ramachandran favored evaluations into a single score, normalized to be on the same scale as X-ray resolution.
Virtual screening
To identify potential inhibitors of PfCK2α, we performed independent and parallel structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) against the 3D model of PfCK2α using Glide software (34). The Chembridge DIVERSet Library was used for the virtual screening. After filtering to prioritize drug-like compounds, we selected a subset of 35,782 compounds. The docking was performed in three-tiered Glide protocol using hierarchical filtering (HTVS, SP, and XP precision modes) (35). Once docking was completed, a docking score of −7.0 kcal/mol was chosen as the cutoff for the next step for PfCK2. The top ranked compounds (2,268) were then screened using a previously developed QSAR phenotypic model (27) to identify novel compounds that may have antimalarial activity. Finally, 168 potential inhibitors of PfCK2α were selected, obtained, and subjected to biological testing (Fig. 2A).
FIG 2.
(A) Workflow of the virtual screening strategy. First, the Chembridge Library with ~50 K compounds was passed through the drug-likeness filter, then through the three molecular docking filters available in ascending order of precision to select the molecules according to an established threshold (−7 kcal/mol). Finally, we used the QSAR model built by Neves et al. (27) to increase our screening accuracy rate. Candidate compounds were then tested against P. falciparum asexual stages and mammalian cell lines. The chemical-genetic interaction profile of the compound with the highest selectivity index was evaluated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion mutants (B and C) Plasmodium growth inhibition of the most active compounds. P. falciparum 3D7 blood-stage parasites were cultured for 72 hours in the presence of compounds at 5 µM (B) or 1 µM (C). Values are normalized as percentage of non-treated parasites; error bars represent the standard error. Inhibition is displayed as a mean of two independent experiments. (D) Structure representation of the most promising molecule (542) and activities against P. falciparum and mammalian cell lines. RI, resistance index (ratio of EC50 for Dd2 to EC50 for 3D7); SI, selectivity index (ratio of EC50 for 3D7 to CC50 for HepG-2).
Biological evaluation
Compounds were evaluated in a fluorescence-based assay against the asexual blood stage of P. falciparum (3D7 strain). For an initial activity assessment, a single concentration of 5 µM was used. Nineteen out of 168 compounds that showed more than 60% of parasite inhibition at 5 µM were rescreened at 1 µM (Fig. 2B and C). Of these, 11 showed greater than 50% inhibition at 1 µM.
To better understand the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of the active compounds, we performed experimental assays to determine the EC50 values of these 11 compounds (Table S1). Compound 318 was excluded from this analysis because it is the only compound in the series that lacks the quinazoline core. Figure. 3 shows a summary of the SAR study. From this analysis, we can see that changes in R1 position have more significant impact on the compound’s antiplasmodial activity compared to changes in R2 or R3. In addition, we found that the presence of electron-donating groups, which render the benzene ring more electron-rich and activate it toward electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions, leads to increased in vitro potency of the series. This positive correlation between the resonance effect of the substituent groups in R1 (anisole > phenol > dimethylaniline > isopropylbenzene > benzamide) and compound activity is depicted in Fig. 3. Compound 509 yields benzamide with a para-substituted amide functionality. Notably, amides exhibit greater electronegativity compared to isopropyl alcohols and dimethylamines. However, the absence of a meta-substituted amide within our compound set restricts a more comprehensive analysis of this distinct functional group. Additionally, our observations indicate a preference for hydrogen atoms over more voluminous substituents in R3. This assertion finds support in the case of compound 501, where the presence of a methyl group instead of a hydrogen atom coincides with the lowest EC50 value in the series. Furthermore, the docking studies conducted on compound 542 revealed that the nitrogen atom forms a hydrogen bond with the CK1 binding site. This interaction would be unattainable if a methyl group was present in the R3 position. Exploring R2 substituents yielded limited insights, primarily stemming from the scarcity of diverse examples solely differing in this group. However, it is noteworthy that longer chains featuring polar moieties exhibited enhancements in compound 518 relative to 543. Similarly, in the case of compound 527 compared to 489, longer chains with polar groups demonstrated improvements. The extension of these chains likely facilitates the establishment of interactions with hydrophobic residues within the binding site.
FIG 3.
Structure-activity relationship of the quinazoline series. Potential PfCK2α inhibitors are arranged based on their antimalarial activity, with the lowest Pf3D7 EC50 values (most potent) on the left and the highest Pf3D7 EC50 values (less potent) on the right. The common quinazoline core (blue) is shared by all the compounds selected. The compounds can be distinguished by the substitution groups present in R1 (pink), R2 (green), and R3 (yellow).
We further evaluated the cytotoxicity of these 11 most active compounds using two lineages of mammalian cells (MCF-7 and HepG-2). The results are summarized in Table S1. No compound presented greater activity against human cells than against parasites, indicating a high likelihood of selectivity for the parasite. We also tested the most active compound 542 in HepG-2 cells after the same time of incubation (72 hr) used for parasite treatment, to ensure that the high selectivity for 542 was not biased by effects on incubation period (SI HepG-2 24h = 223 × SI HepG-2 72h = 205). Furthermore, we also tested the compound 542 in a non-cancer cell line (COS-7) (SI COS-7 72h = 294). In both cases, the same degree of selectivity was observed (Fig. S1).
Compound 542 was selected for the determination of its EC50 value against a multi-resistant (Dd2) strain of P. falciparum due to its high antiplasmodial activity, low cytotoxicity, and chemical structure suitable for optimization (Fig. 2D). The compound exhibited potent activity against both chloroquine-sensitive and multidrug-resistant parasite strains. Chloroquine, on the other hand was shown to be nearly eight times less active against Dd2 resistant strain. In summary, the data suggest that this compound showed no sign of cross-resistance with antimalarials, such as chloroquine, pyrimethamine, and mefloquine. Moreover, compound 542 was threefold more active against Dd2 strain when compared to chloroquine (EC50 = 25 and 90 nM, respectively) (Fig. 2D).
To assess the selectivity of 542, we tested the compound at a single concentration (1 µM) in a competitive binding assay using fluorescent tracers against a panel of 29 human kinases. Although the human kinome has more than 500 proteins, kinases in the panel covered almost all protein kinase families (Fig. 4). In this panel, binding of the fluorescent tracer to the target kinase by 542 was inhibited >30% for only two human kinases: GPRK5 (39%) and MAP3K14 (39%). For comparison, we used two known human kinase inhibitors (CRT0066101 and CP673451), which showed a broader kinase binding profile (Fig. 4). Taken together, the high activity against malaria parasites of 542, in combination with its selectivity profile, offers and attractive starting point for new antimalarial therapies.
FIG 4.
(A) Human kinome dendogram created using KinMap. Human kinases present in the panel are indicated by colored circles. Orange circles indicate kinases that showed between 30 and 60% binding to compound 542. (B) Representation of tracer displacement caused by compound 542 in different human kinases. Proteins are divided in low (<30%, green), mild (30–60%, yellow), and high (>60%, red) displacement. Compound 542 did not cause high displacement in any of the tested proteins. For comparison, results are also shown for two promiscuous human kinase inhibitors, CRT0066101 and CP673451.
Structure-based modeling with predicted PfCK2α inhibitors
To simulate the ligand-receptor binding process, we docked the most active predicted PfCK2α inhibitor (542) into the ATP-binding pocket, and as expected, this compound was well accommodated inside the active site. The predicted molecular interactions of compound 542 in the ATP-binding site of PfCK2α are shown in Fig. 5. This compound has a quinazoline core that is a recognized chemical moiety that has been previously shown to inhibit P. falciparum growth (36), but for which the mechanism of action (MoA) remains to be determined. The quinazoline core of compound forms hydrophobic interactions with Phe117 (gatekeeper), and Ile120 (hinge) of the ATP-binding site. Additionally, compound 542 forms polar interactions with DWG domain (Asp179). One of the key interactions of ATP and ATP-competitive inhibitors is the H-bonding with the backbone amides in the hinge region, but as the hinge is a conserved region, selectivity can be difficult to achieve. Plasmodial CK2αs have substitutions in the hinge residues (Glu118, Tyr119, and Ile120) compared to one of its human orthologue CK2αs (Glu114, His115, and Val116) but are identical with the hinge sequence of CK2α′ (Fig. 1B).
FIG 5.
Representation of 3D intermolecular interactions of compound 542 predicted by docking with PfCK2α. 3D interactions showing hydrogen bonds in magenta dashed lines and hydrophobic interactions are represented by gray surfaces. Carbon atoms of amino acid residues are colored in pale cyan.
Yeast chemical-genetic interactions
Although advances in computer-aided drug design and in silico docking approaches increase the chances of finding specific inhibitors, these techniques are not yet sufficient to identify drug targets in vivo. Due to its high antiplasmodial activity and selectivity index, we decided to further explore the potential mechanism of action of compound 542 using chemical-genetic interactions in a yeast model. Genetic interactions between two genes (e.g., gene A and gene B) occur when an unexpected, combined single-deletion mutant phenotype is observed through positive (growth AΔ*BΔ − growth AΔ*growth of BΔ >0, fitness enhancement) or negative (growth AΔ*BΔ − growth AΔ*growth of BΔ <0, fitness defect) genetic interactions. As chemical perturbations mimic genetic perturbations, we can employ data from genetic interactions to suggest functional interactions between small molecules and gene products. Drug sensitivity can arise when a compound affects an element of a pathway that is parallel to a pathway with a mutant component. Increased growth, or resistance, can arise when the drug target, or a protein from the same pathway as the target, is absent (37, 38).
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome encodes two CK2αs: Cka1 and Cka2. While CKA1 and CKA2 are non-essential genes, their double deletion (cka1Δ cka2Δ) results in growth defects due to a negative genetic interaction. We hypothesized that adding an inhibitor of Cka2 in a yeast mutant lacking Cka1 (cka1Δ) would reproduce the same growth defect phenotype and that a Cka1 inhibitor added to a yeast mutant lacking Cka2 (cka2Δ) would yield similar results. Furthermore, treatment of eap1Δ mutant (positive genetic interaction with cka1Δ and negative genetic interaction with cka2Δ) with 542 would be able to suggest if and which of the yeast’s CK2αs could be inhibited by the test compound.
We then performed multiple sequence alignments of Plasmodium, human and yeast CK2αs, noting that the Plasmodium hinge residues (Glu118, Tyr119, and Ile120) were more similar to the equivalent residues in the yeast Cka1 (Glu153, Tyr154, and Val155) than in Cka2 (Glu125, Glu126, and Ile127); hence, a Plasmodium inhibitor targeting the hinge region should inhibit Cka1, but not Cka2, in yeast (Fig. S2).
Thus, to better understand the mode of action of 542, we chose a wild-type control with the antibiotic resistant marker inserted in a neutral locus (his3Δ) and three single-deletion mutant yeast strains with known genetic interaction profiles to evaluate changes in fitness under treatment with the 542 inhibitor (Fig. 6A and B). Wild-type and cka1Δ strains presented no growth defect in the presence of the test compound (Fig. 6C). However, the mutant line cka2Δ (synthetic sick with cka1Δ) presented fitness defect when combined with 542, while eap1Δ (positive genetic interaction with cka1Δ and negative genetic interaction with cka2Δ) showed fitness enhancement in the presence of the compound 542. Hence, the chemical-genetic profile of yeast mutants treated with compound 542 is consistent with the inhibition of yeast Cka1 but not inhibition of Cka2.
FIG 6.
(A) Possible chemical-genetic interaction profiles consistent with Cka1 or Cka2 inhibition based on known genetic interactions (negative genetic interactions: cka1Δ with cka2Δ and eap1Δ with cka2Δ; positive genetic interaction cka1Δ with eap1Δ). (B) Parameters extracted from growth curves of mutant strains grown in the presence of compound 542 or solvent control to determine their respective growth scores. (C) Normalized growth scores of wild type (his3Δ) and mutant strains grown in the presence of 542. Bar graphs represent growth of three biological replicates. Error bars represent standard error based on three biological replicates. Significance was assessed using a two-tailed t-test, with statistical significance denoted as follows: *P < 0.1, **P < 0.01.
Conclusions
Herein, we performed a hierarchical virtual screening by using structure- and ligand-based approaches, leading to the identification of eleven compounds with antiplasmodial activity in the nanomolar range, one of which (542) had good selectivity index. The best hit compound, 542, contains a quinazoline moiety, a known scaffold with reported antiplasmodial activity, but with an unknown MoA. To gain some insight into 542’s MoA, we performed chemical-genetic interaction analysis using yeast as a model. In agreement with our in silico results hypothesizing that 542 inhibits PfCK2α via hinge region interaction, our chemical-genetic interactions suggest that 542 seems to inhibit yeast Cka1, which has a hinge region with high similarity to PfCK2α. The chemical-genetic interaction profile also suggests that 542 does not inhibit Cka2.
Thus, employing in silico and in vitro experiments, we identified a quinazoline molecule with high antiplasmodial activity against asexual stages and low toxicity against host cells. Our data reinforce the initial hypothesis that suggested compound 542 as a PfCK2α inhibitor. While we have made progress in comprehending the mechanism of action of 542 by employing chemical-genetic interactions in yeast as a model, additional assays are necessary to validate the target, in addition to the scope of this publication. These assays include in vitro kinase inhibition assays, biophysical assays, genome-scale thermal proteome profiling in P. falciparum, and genomic analysis of Plasmodium 542-resistant lines. Overall, our strategy has identified a promising non-toxic molecule that can undergo further hit-to-lead optimization.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are incredibly grateful to Brazilian funding agencies Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), CNPq, CAPES, Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (FAPEG), and to the Swedish Research Council (grants 2016–05627 and 2021–03667). K.C.P.T. thanks FAPESP (grants 2018/05926–2, and 2019/17062–5). FAPESP funded T.A.T. (2019/27626-3), J.V.B.B. (2019/21854-4), K.B.M. and R.M.C. (2014/50897-0), V.M.A. (2022/00743-2), G.C.C. (2015/20774-6), and F.T.M.C. (grants 2017/18611–7 and 2018/07007–4). L.C.S.A. was funded by CNPq (162117/2018–3). E.B. was supported by FAPESP (2015/03553-6 and 2018/07007–4) and CAPES (88887.304810/2018–00). J.V.B.B. and J.T.M.F. were supported by CAPES (Finance Code 001). C.H.A. and M.M. thanks FAPEG (grants 20171026700006 and 202010267000272). C.H.A. thanks the “L'Oréal-UNESCO-ABC Para Mulheres na Ciência” and “L’Oréal-UNESCO International Rising Talents” for the awards and fellowships received, which partially funded this work. C.H.A. and F.T.M.C. are CNPq research fellows.
We are thankful to Liam B. King for his critical review of the report.
G.C.C., C.H.A., and F.T.M.C. conceived and designed the study. K.C.P.T., T.A.T., J.E.L., V.M.A., L.C.C., and L.C.S.A. performed the laboratory work. K.C.P.T., J.V.B.B., M.M., B.K.P.S., J.T.M.F., and C.H.A. performed the computational analysis. P.S., E.B., C.H.A., K.B.M., R.M.C., and F.T.M.C. provided resources and laboratory infrastructure. K.C.P.T., P.S., E.B., J.E.L., T.A.T., C.B., and G.C.C. analyzed the data. K.C.P.T., T.A.T., V.M.A., J.E.L., and J.V.B.B. designed the figures. K.C.P.T., T.A.T., J.V.B.B., and G.C.C. wrote the manuscript. F.T.M.C., P.S., E.B., C.H.A., and M.M. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Gustavo C. Cassiano, Email: gcapatti@hotmail.com.
Fabio T. M. Costa, Email: fabiotmc72@gmail.com.
Audrey Odom John, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA .
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00589-23.
Antimalarial and citotoxicity of tested compounds and alignment of CK2.
Sheet shows all compounds tested in this study.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. WHO . 2021. Word malaria report 2021 word malaria report Geneva: World health organization. Licence CC. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Cohen P. 2002. Protein kinases--the major drug targets of the twenty-first century? Nat Rev Drug Discov 1:309–315. doi: 10.1038/nrd773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Doerig C. 2004. Protein kinases as targets for anti-parasitic chemotherapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1697:155–168. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2003.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Talevich E, Tobin AB, Kannan N, Doerig C. 2012. An evolutionary perspective on the kinome of malaria parasites. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:2607–2618. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sinxadi P, Donini C, Johnstone H, Langdon G, Wiesner L, Allen E, Duparc S, Chalon S, McCarthy JS, Lorch U, Chibale K, Möhrle J, Barnes KI. 2020. Safety tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antimalarial activity of the novel Plasmodium phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase inhibitor MMV390048 in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01896-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01896-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Schittek B, Sinnberg T. 2014. Biological functions of casein kinase 1 isoforms and putative roles in tumorigenesis. Mol Cancer 13:231. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Johnson AE, Chen J-S, Gould KL. 2013. CK1 is required for a mitotic checkpoint that delays cytokinesis. Curr Biol 23:1920–1926. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Knippschild U, Gocht A, Wolff S, Huber N, Löhler J, Stöter M. 2005. The casein kinase 1 family: participation in multiple cellular processes in eukaryotes. Cell Signal 17:675–689. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bernatik O, Ganji RS, Dijksterhuis JP, Konik P, Cervenka I, Polonio T, Krejci P, Schulte G, Bryja V. 2011. Sequential activation and inactivation of dishevelled in the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway by casein kinases. J Biol Chem 286:10396–10410. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.169870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Eng GWL, Virshup DM. 2017. Site-specific phosphorylation of casein kinase 1 δ (CK1δ) regulates its activity towards the circadian regulator PER2. PLoS One 12:e0177834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Li Q, Li K, Yang T, Zhang S, Zhou Y, Li Z, Xiong J, Zhou F, Zhou X, Liu L, Meng R, Wu G. 2017. Association of protein kinase CK2 inhibition with cellular radiosensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep 7:16134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16012-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Dixit D, Sharma V, Ghosh S, Mehta VS, Sen E. 2012. Inhibition of casein kinase-2 induces p53-dependent cell cycle arrest and sensitizes glioblastoma cells to tumor necrosis factor (TNFα)-induced apoptosis through SIRT1 inhibition. Cell Death Dis 3:e271. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ghavidel A, Schultz MC. 2001. TATA binding protein-associated CK2 transduces DNA damage signals to the RNA polymerase III transcriptional machinery. Cell 106:575–584. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00473-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Graciotti M, Alam M, Solyakov L, Schmid R, Burley G, Bottrill AR, Doerig C, Cullis P, Tobin AB. 2014. Malaria protein kinase CK2 (PfCK2) shows novel mechanisms of regulation. PLoS One 9:e85391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Dastidar EG, Dayer G, Holland ZM, Dorin-Semblat D, Claes A, Chêne A, Sharma A, Hamelin R, Moniatte M, Lopez-Rubio J-J, Scherf A, Doerig C. 2012. Involvement of Plasmodium falciparum protein kinase CK2 in the chromatin assembly pathway. BMC Biol 10:5. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-10-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Cheong JK, Virshup DM. 2011. Casein kinase 1: complexity in the family. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 43:465–469. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Holland Z, Prudent R, Reiser J-B, Cochet C, Doerig C. 2009. Functional analysis of protein kinase CK2 of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Eukaryot Cell 8:388–397. doi: 10.1128/EC.00334-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hitz E, Grüninger O, Passecker A, Wyss M, Scheurer C, Wittlin S, Beck H-P, Brancucci NMB, Voss TS. 2021. The catalytic subunit of Plasmodium falciparum casein kinase 2 is essential for gametocytogenesis. Commun Biol 4:336. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01873-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ruiz-Carrillo D, Lin J, El Sahili A, Wei M, Sze SK, Cheung PCF, Doerig C, Lescar J. 2018. The protein kinase CK2 catalytic domain from Plasmodium falciparum: crystal structure, tyrosine kinase activity and inhibition. Sci Rep 8:7365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25738-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Žídek A, Potapenko A, Bridgland A, Meyer C, Kohl SAA, Ballard AJ, Cowie A, Romera-Paredes B, Nikolov S, Jain R, Adler J, Back T, Petersen S, Reiman D, Clancy E, Zielinski M, Steinegger M, Pacholska M, Berghammer T, Bodenstein S, Silver D, Vinyals O, Senior AW, Kavukcuoglu K, Kohli P, Hassabis D. 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596:583–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Williams CJ, Headd JJ, Moriarty NW, Prisant MG, Videau LL, Deis LN, Verma V, Keedy DA, Hintze BJ, Chen VB, Jain S, Lewis SM, Arendall WB, Snoeyink J, Adams PD, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. 2018. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci 27:293–315. doi: 10.1002/pro.3330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kanev GK, de Graaf C, Westerman BA, de Esch IJP, Kooistra AJ. 2021. KLIFS: an overhaul after the first 5 years of supporting kinase research. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D562–D569. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Borrel A, Regad L, Xhaard H, Petitjean M, Camproux A-C. 2015. PockDrug: a model for predicting pocket druggability that overcomes pocket estimation uncertainties. J Chem Inf Model 55:882–895. doi: 10.1021/ci5006004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. 2001. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings 1PII of original article: S0169-409X(96)00423-1. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 46:3–26. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Veber DF, Johnson SR, Cheng H-Y, Smith BR, Ward KW, Kopple KD. 2002. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J Med Chem 45:2615–2623. doi: 10.1021/jm020017n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Varnek A, Fourches D, Horvath D, Klimchuk O, Gaudin C, Vayer P, Solov’ev V, Hoonakker F, Tetko I, Marcou G. 2008. ISIDA - platform for virtual screening based on fragment and pharmacophoric descriptors. Curr Comput Aided-Drug Des 4:191–198. doi: 10.2174/157340908785747465 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Neves BJ, Braga RC, Alves VM, Lima MNN, Cassiano GC, Muratov EN, Costa FTM, Andrade CH. 2020. Deep learning-driven research for drug discovery: tackling malaria. PLoS Comput Biol 16:e1007025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Trager W, Jensen JB. 1976. Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science 193:673–675. doi: 10.1126/science.781840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hartwig CL, Ahmed AOA, Cooper RA, Stedman TT. 2013. SYBR green I-based parasite growth inhibition assay for measurement of antimalarial drug susceptibility in Plasmodium falciparum , p 122–129. In Methods in malaria research [Google Scholar]
- 30. Lambros C, Vanderberg JP. 1979. Synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stages in culture. J Parasitol 65:418–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Mosmann T. 1983. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lall N, Henley-Smith CJ, De Canha MN, Oosthuizen CB, Berrington D. 2013. Viability reagent, PrestoBlue, in comparison with other available reagents, utilized in cytotoxicity and antimicrobial assays. Int J Microbiol 2013:420601. doi: 10.1155/2013/420601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Usaj M, Tan Y, Wang W, VanderSluis B, Zou A, Myers CL, Costanzo M, Andrews B, Boone C. 2017. TheCellMap.org: a web-accessible database for visualizing and mining the global yeast genetic interaction network. G3 (Bethesda) 7:1539–1549. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.040220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Halgren TA, Murphy RB, Friesner RA, Beard HS, Frye LL, Pollard WT, Banks JL. 2004. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J Med Chem 47:1750–1759. doi: 10.1021/jm030644s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Friesner RA, Murphy RB, Repasky MP, Frye LL, Greenwood JR, Halgren TA, Sanschagrin PC, Mainz DT. 2006. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J Med Chem 49:6177–6196. doi: 10.1021/jm051256o [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Gamo F-J, Sanz LM, Vidal J, de Cozar C, Alvarez E, Lavandera J-L, Vanderwall DE, Green DVS, Kumar V, Hasan S, Brown JR, Peishoff CE, Cardon LR, Garcia-Bustos JF. 2010. Thousands of chemical starting points for antimalarial lead identification. Nature 465:305–310. doi: 10.1038/nature09107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Baryshnikova A. 2018. Spatial analysis of functional enrichment (SAFE) in large biological networks. Methods Mol Biol 1819:249–268. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8618-7_12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Costanzo M, VanderSluis B, Koch EN, Baryshnikova A, Pons C, Tan G, Wang W, Usaj M, Hanchard J, Lee SD, Pelechano V, Styles EB, Billmann M, van Leeuwen J, van Dyk N, Lin Z-Y, Kuzmin E, Nelson J, Piotrowski JS, Srikumar T, Bahr S, Chen Y, Deshpande R, Kurat CF, Li SC, Li Z, Usaj MM, Okada H, Pascoe N, San Luis B-J, Sharifpoor S, Shuteriqi E, Simpkins SW, Snider J, Suresh HG, Tan Y, Zhu H, Malod-Dognin N, Janjic V, Przulj N, Troyanskaya OG, Stagljar I, Xia T, Ohya Y, Gingras A-C, Raught B, Boutros M, Steinmetz LM, Moore CL, Rosebrock AP, Caudy AA, Myers CL, Andrews B, Boone C. 2016. A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function. Science 353:aaf1420. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Antimalarial and citotoxicity of tested compounds and alignment of CK2.
Sheet shows all compounds tested in this study.






