Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2005 Mar;73(3):1903–1905. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1903-1905.2005

Mice Fed Lipid-Encapsulated Mycobacterium bovis BCG Are Protected against Aerosol Challenge with Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Frank E Aldwell 1,*, Lise Brandt 2,, Clare Fitzpatrick 1, Ian M Orme 2
PMCID: PMC1064971  PMID: 15731098

Abstract

Mice that consumed a single dose of 107 lipid-encapsulated Mycobacterium bovis BCG bacilli showed significant pulmonary and systemic protection against aerosol challenge with M. tuberculosis H37Rv. As an extension of previous challenge studies with virulent strains of M. bovis, this report describes a reduction in M. tuberculosis infection in mice vaccinated orally with lipid-encapculated BCG comparable to that observed in mice vaccinated subcutaneously with BCG. These results are consistent with the induction of tuberculin-specific cell-mediated immune responses.


Despite antibiotic treatment and a widely used vaccine, tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death by a single disease-causing organism (5). Intradermal inoculation of live attenuated Mycobacterium bovis BCG remains the most effective method of vaccinating humans against pulmonary TB. However, the efficacy of this method is highly variable, due in no small part to the requirement of delivering live bacilli in order to stimulate a protective cell-mediated immune (CMI) response (12). Accordingly, improved methods for the preparation and delivery of BCG, necessary to ensure an effective dose of viable, replicating, immunogenic microorganisms, are much sought after as a means of improving vaccine efficacy.

The BCG vaccine was administered orally to children between 1921 and 1976, although this route has since been largely abandoned as a public health measure due to concerns over vaccine efficacy and safety (6). Nevertheless, oral vaccination remains an attractive proposition due to its noninvasive nature, and recent research has seen renewed interest in the development of an oral live BCG vaccine (7-9, 11). We previously described a lipid coating method that maintains a high viability of encapsulated BCG bacilli for up to 4 weeks at room temperature (1, 2). This formulation is immunogenic when fed to BALB/c mice, promoting strong tuberculin-specific lymphoproliferative responses and gamma interferon (IFN-γ) secretion. Moreover, mice immunized with a single oral dose of the formulated vaccine show a significant degree of protection against aerosol challenge with a virulent strain of the homologous species (M. bovis strain 83/6235), with 1- to 2-log-unit fold reductions in pathogen burdens typically being observed in lung and spleen tissue samples. However, the protective efficacy of this method of vaccination against virulent human tubercle bacilli (M. tuberculosis) remains to be determined; this is an important issue, since comparative studies have suggested that BCG vaccination may provide less protection against M. tuberculosis than against virulent strains of M. bovis (16). In this report, we describe protection afforded to C57BL/6 mice against M. tuberculosis H37Rv after a single immunizing dose of lipid-encapsulated live BCG.

For oral vaccine preparation, mid-log-phase M. bovis BCG bacilli (Pasteur 1173P2 grown in Middlebrook 7H9 broth) were encapsulated into lipid microdroplets at 37°C as described previously (1). Two alternative formulations were used, each comprising >95% triglycerides with the following fatty acid (FA) profiles: lipid C (predominated by the monoenoic FA oleic acid at 50% and containing palmitic, stearic, linoleic, and myristic acids at 25, 15, 6, and 1%, respectively) and lipid K (predominated by the saturated FA lauric acid at 50% and containing myristic, palmitic, oleic, stearic, and linoleic acids at 18, 8, 6, 2, and 1%, respectively). Lipid-encapsulated BCG preparations were flavored with chocolate powder (1) and allowed to solidify at room temperature before being cut into standardized pellets containing approximately 107 bacilli/pellet.

Specific-pathogen-free 6- to 8-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were kept in barrier conditions and maintained on standard mouse chow with water supplied ad libitum. For oral vaccination, mice were separated into individual cages, taken off food for 12 h, and then offered a single BCG-containing pellet in either the lipid C or the lipid K formulation; consumption was ensured by close monitoring. For subcutaneous immunization, positive control mice were vaccinated at the base of the tail with 4 × 105 CFU of nonencapsulated BCG in 7H9 broth, while negative control animals received phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) alone.

Vaccination and immune response studies were conducted in laboratories at the University of Otago. At 15 weeks after vaccination, eight mice per group were euthanized. Single-spleen-cell suspensions (1 ml) containing 2.5 × 106 splenocytes were stimulated in the presence of 60 μg of bovine purified protein derivative (PPD) (CSL Ltd., Melbourne, Victoria, Australia)/ml or PBS as a control as described elsewhere (1). After 72 h, cell-free supernatants were collected. Cytokines were assessed by using commercial IFN-γ and interleukin 2 (IL-2) capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Duoset kits; R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.). Significant levels of IFN-γ were detected in PPD-stimulated splenocyte culture supernatants for all three groups of vaccinated mice (Fig. 1), although antigen-stimulated production of IL-2 was detected only in subcutaneously vaccinated mice. IFN-γ production was highest among subcutaneously vaccinated mice; there was no apparent difference in IFN-γ production in mice vaccinated orally with BCG in the lipid C formulation and with BCG in the lipid K formulation.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Effects of subcutaneously delivered BCG or orally delivered lipid-encapsulated BCG vaccination on cytokine production in PPD-stimulated murine splenocyte cultures. Data are means ± standard errors of the means for eight mice per group for IFN-γ (black bars) and IL-2 (white bars). Asterisks indicate values in vaccinated animals that were significantly different from corresponding values in control animals at a P value of <0.05 (Student's t test). N.V., nonvaccinated control animals (sham injection of PBS).

Vaccination and challenge infection studies were conducted in a level III biohazard facility at Colorado State University. The challenge inoculum was obtained from a batch-lot frozen culture of M. tuberculosis H37Rv (1-ml aliquots, stored at −70°C) which had been grown from low-passage seed lots in Proskauer-Beck liquid medium containing 0.05% Tween 80 to early mid-log phase (15). At 15 weeks after vaccination, eight mice per group were infected with M. tuberculosis H37Rv via respiratory challenge with an aerosol generation device (Glas-Col, Terre Haute, Ind.), which was calibrated to deliver approximately 100 bacilli/animal. Mice were sacrificed 4 weeks after M. tuberculosis infection. Spleen and lung homogenates were prepared in PBS-0.05% Tween 80 and plated in double serial fivefold dilutions on Middlebrook 7H11 Bacto agar for the enumeration of mycobacteria (with or without the addition of 2 μg of 2-thiophene-carboxylic acid hydrazide/ml to selectively inhibit the growth of any residual BCG bacilli in the test organs). Compared to the results obtained for control (nonvaccinated) animals, significant reductions in the geometric mean bacterial burdens were recorded for mice from all three vaccine groups for both organs (Table 1). Notably, there was a >1-log-unit reduction in bacterial burdens in the lungs and spleens of mice vaccinated orally with BCG in the lipid C formulation; this level of protection was comparable to or greater than the corresponding level of protection seen in subcutaneously vaccinated mice. There were no significant differences in protection among the various vaccination groups.

TABLE 1.

Effects of subcutaneously delivered BCG or orally delivered lipid-encapsulated BCG vaccination on tissue bacterial burdens after aerosol challenge with M. tuberculosis

Group Results for:
Lungs
Spleens
Log10 CFU/organa Log10 resistanceb Log10 CFU/organa Log10 resistanceb
Nonvaccinated (control) 6.24 ± 0.05 NA 5.53 ± 0.14 NA
Subcutaneous BCG 5.46 ± 0.05* 0.78 3.88 ± 0.12* 1.65
Oral BCG in lipid C formulation 5.22 ± 0.08* 1.03 3.88 ± 0.17* 1.64
Oral BCG in lipid K formulation 5.80 ± 0.15* 0.44 4.02 ± 0.23* 1.51
a

Data are geometric means ± standard error of the means for duplicate analysis of eight mice in each group. The efficacies of different vaccinations were compared by a one-way analysis of variance of the log 10 CFU, followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test. *P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

b

Protective efficacy, expressed as log10 reductions in bacterial loads compared to nonvaccinated control animals (which received a sham injection of PBS). NA: Not applicable.

Despite recent developments in the protective efficacy of subunit protein and DNA vaccines (4, 10, 14), live BCG remains an effective vaccination agent for the establishment of protective immunity against TB, especially childhood disease. Parenterally administered live BCG is a standard method for inducing a protective CMI response against pulmonary infection, although recent progress has been made toward delivering BCG via the mucosal route to establish protection (3, 9). In order to invoke a protective response with BCG, live replicating bacilli must reach sites of immune induction. For that reason, our research has focused on developing an improved means of maintaining viable BCG bacilli in a lipid-encapsulated form as an oral delivery vehicle (1, 2).

In the present study, two different forms of lipid-encapsulated BCG were shown to invoke system-level lymphocyte sensitization in mice, as evidenced by in vitro tuberculin-specific IFN-γ production in splenocyte cultures. Stimulated splenocytes from lipid-encapsulated BCG-fed C57BL/6 mice assessed 15 weeks after vaccination produced 1,300 to 1,600 pg of IFN-γ/ml; these levels compare favorably to IFN-γ levels that we observed previously in lipid-encapsulated BCG-fed BALB/c mice assessed 8 weeks after vaccination (1). These results indicate that a strong PPD-specific CMI response can be sustained for over 3 months after a single oral vaccination. However, noteworthy from the present study was the fact that orally vaccinated mice produced lower levels of IFN-γ than mice vaccinated via a standard subcutaneous route and, moreover, only mice vaccinated via the parenteral route produced statistically significant levels of IL-2 in response to PPD stimulation. Together, these data suggest that although oral vaccination of mice with lipid-encapsulated BCG is able to invoke a strong and sustained IFN-γ response, the magnitude of the CMI response, at the systemic level at least, is not as great as that observed after parenteral vaccination.

As anticipated (4, 13), subcutaneous vaccination of C57BL/6 mice with BCG was able to confer protection against aerosol challenge with M. tuberculosis H37Rv, with significant reductions in bacterial burdens being observed in lung and spleen tissue samples. In addition, both test preparations of orally administered BCG (BCG in lipid C and lipid K formulations) were shown to confer significant protection against M. tuberculosis, with BCG in the lipid C formulation in particular reducing bacterial burdens to levels comparable to (splenic tissue) or lower than (lung tissue) those observed in subcutaneously vaccinated mice. These results correlate with our previous observation that orally delivered lipid-encapsulated BCG can protect against aerosol challenge with a virulent strain of M. bovis (1) and are particularly relevant to interpretation of the protective capacity of orally delivered BCG against virulent mycobacteria that ordinarily infect via the respiratory route. Other recent studies reported the outcome of systemic mycobacterial challenge in orally vaccinated mice, whereby oral delivery of a high dose (2 × 109 CFU [9]) or a low dose (1 × 107 CFU [11]) of BCG to mice was shown to confer protection against intravenous challenge with a high dose of virulent M. tuberculosis (1 × 105 CFU). In contrast, the present report highlights protection against mycobacterial challenge via the natural pulmonary route in a low-dose aerosol model.

Orally delivered preparations of BCG represent a potentially valuable vaccine tool for the control of TB (7), and the present study provides evidence that lipid encapsulation of BCG microorganisms may further extend the utility of the oral BCG vaccine. Our previous studies indicated that lipid encapsulation can increase the protective efficacy of orally delivered BCG beyond that observed with bacilli in a conventional format (1, 2). Further studies are required to optimize this oral delivery system (e.g., by identifying the particular immune induction sites at which lipid-encapsulated BCG is active) as well as to define patterns of lymphocyte trafficking and effector site responsiveness that correspond to protection.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants AI-45707 and AI-75320 from the National Institutes of Health and by the New Zealand Animal Health Board.

We thank Jolynn Trout for excellent technical assistance. We acknowledge the assistance of the staff of the CSU Small Animal Unit, Colorado State University, in caring for the vaccinated mice that were challenged with M. tuberculosis and the Department of Animal Laboratory Sciences, University of Otago, for caring for the vaccinated mice that were used in immunological studies.

Editor: W. A. Petri, Jr.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aldwell, F. E., I. G. Tucker, G. W. de Lisle, and B. M. Buddle. 2003. Oral delivery of Mycobacterium bovis BCG in a lipid formulation induces resistance to pulmonary tuberculosis in mice. Infect. Immun. 71:101-108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aldwell, F. E., D. Keen, N. Parlane, M. A. Skinner, G. W. de Lisle, and B. M. Buddle. 2003. Oral vaccination with Mycobacterium bovis BCG in a lipid formulation induces resistance to pulmonary tuberculosis in possums. Vaccine 22:70-76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen, L., J. Wang, A. Zganiacz, and Z. Xing. 2004. Single intranasal mucosal Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination confers improved protection compared to subcutaneous vaccination against pulmonary tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 72:238-246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Doherty, T. M., A. W. Olsen, L. van Pinxteren, and P. Andersen. 2002. Oral vaccination with subunit vaccines protects animals against aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 70:3111-3121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dolin, P. J., M. C. Raviglione, and A. Kochi. 1994. Global tuberculosis incidence and mortality during 1990-2000. Bull. W. H. O. 72:213-220. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gheorghiu, M., M. Lagranderie, and A. M. Balazuc. 1996. Stabilisation of BCG vaccines. New approaches to stabilisation of vaccine potency. Dev. Biol. Stand. 87:251-261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hoft, D. F., R. M. Brown, and R. B. Belshe. 2000. Mucosal bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccination of humans inhibits delayed-type hypersensitivity to purified protein derivative but induces mycobacteria-specific interferon-gamma responses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 30(Suppl. 3):S217-S222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lagranderie, M., A. M. Balazuc, E. Deriaud, C. D. Leclerc, and M. Gheorghiu. 1996. Comparison of immune responses of mice immunized with five different Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine strains. Infect. Immun. 64:1-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lagranderie, M., P. Chavarot, A. M. Balazuc, and G. Marchal. 2000. Immunogenicity and protective capacity of Mycobacterium bovis BCG after oral or intragastric administration in mice. Vaccine 18:1186-1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lima, K. M., S. A. Santos, V. M. Lima, A. A. Coelho-Castelo, J. M. Rodrigues, Jr., and C. L. Silva. 2003. Single dose of a vaccine based on DNA encoding mycobacterial hsp65 protein plus TDM-loaded PLGA microspheres protects mice against a virulent strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Gene Ther. 10:678-685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Manabe, Y. C., C. P. Scott, and W. R. Bisha. 2002. Naturally attenuated, orally administered Mycobacterium microti as a tuberculosis vaccine is better than subcutaneous Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Infect. Immun. 70:1566-1570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Olsen, A. W., L. Brandt, E. M. Agger, L. A. Van Pinxteren, and P. Andersen. 2004. The influence of remaining live BCG organisms in vaccinated mice on the maintenance of immunity to tuberculosis. Scand. J. Immunol. 60:273-277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Orme, I. M., and F. M. Collins. 1984. Efficacy of Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination in mice undergoing prior pulmonary infection with atypical mycobacteria. Infect. Immun. 44:28-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Skeiky, Y. A., M. R. Alderson, P. J. Ovendale, J. A. Guderian, L. Brandt, D. C. Dillon, A. Campos-Neto, Y. Lobet, W. Dalemans, I. M. Orme, and S. G. Reed. 2004. Differential immune responses and protective efficacy induced by components of a tuberculosis polyprotein vaccine, Mtb72F, delivered as naked DNA or recombinant protein. J. Immunol. 172:7618-7628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Turner, J., M. Gonzalez-Juarrero, B. M. Saunders, J. V. Brooks, P. Marietta, D. L. Ellis, A. A. Frank, A. M. Cooper, and I. M. Orme. 2001. Immunological basis for reactivation of tuberculosis in mice. Infect. Immun. 69:3264-3270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Williams, A., A. Davies, P. D. Marsh, M. A. Chambers, and R. G. Hewinson. 2000. Comparison of the protective efficacy of bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccination against aerosol challenge with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 30(Suppl. 3):S299-S301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES