ABSTRACT
London is a predicted temperate bacteriophage with siphovirus morphology infecting Arthrobacter globiformis NRRL strain B-2880. Sequencing of the genome revealed a length of 43,599 bp comprising 69 predicted open-reading frames and no tRNA genes. It is categorized as a cluster AZ1 phage along with closely related actinobacteriophages Elezi, Eraser, and Niobe.
KEYWORDS: bacteriophages, arthrobacter, genomes
ANNOUNCEMENT
In an age where antibiotic resistance is becoming a significant healthcare threat, bacteriophages offer an alternative treatment for managing bacterial infections. Additionally, novel infections are emerging with ubiquitous and previously “benign” bacteria such as soil-borne Arthrobacter species (1). Here, we report on the discovery of phage London, isolated from soil collected near Chesapeake, Virginia, USA (36.780000N, 76.275000W) in September 2019 using standard methods (2). Briefly, collected soil was shaken in peptone-yeast extract calcium medium for 1 h, and the supernatant was passed through a 0.2-µm filter. Filtrate was inoculated with Arthrobacter globiformis NRRL B-2880 and incubated with shaking for 48 h at 30°C prior to further filtration and plating using a 0.4% top agar overlay with A. globiformis. Plates were incubated at 30°C, and resulting plaques (Fig. 1, left) were purified through three rounds of plating. Negative staining with 1% uranyl acetate and transmission electron microscopy revealed London as having siphovirus morphology (Fig. 1, right). Genomic DNA was isolated from London lysates using a Promega Wizard DNA cleanup kit, and sequencing libraries were created with NEB Ultra II Library Kit (v.3) reagents. DNA sequencing was completed on an Illumina MiSeq platform, with 829,566 single-end 150-bp reads and approximately 2,712-fold coverage. Sequences were assembled and finished as previously described (3) using Newbler (v.2.9) with default parameters and Consed (v.29).
Fig 1.
Arthrobacter phage London. (Left) Plaques with turbid edges and clear centers (1–3 mm in diamter) formed after 24 h of incubation at 30°C on peptone-yeast extract calcium medium with host Arthrobacter globiformis NRRL B-2880. Plaques became more turbid after 48 h. (Right) Negative-staining transmission electron micrograph of London, a siphovirus with a tail length of 114–121 nm (n = 17) and an isometric capsid of 55–62 nm in diameter (n = 20). Scale bar is 50 nm. Imaged on a Philips CM-10 TEM at 80 kV.
London’s genome is 43,599 bp long with 3′ 11-bp single-stranded ends. It has 66.6% G-C content, like that of the host used, Arthrobacter globiformis [66% G-C (4)]. Based on >50% nucleotide similarity with previously sequenced phages (5), London was classified as a cluster AZ1 phage in the PhagesDB Actinobacteriophage Database (6). Putative genes were identified using GLIMMER (v.3.02) (7), GeneMarkS (v.2.5) (8), Phamerator (9), and Starterator (v.1.0.1) (https://github.com/SEA-PHAGES/starterator). National Center for Biotechnology Information BLASTP [nonredundant protein database (10)], HHpred [default databases (11)], and the Conserved Domain Database (12) were used to predict functions. Transmembrane proteins were evaluated with TMHMM (v.2.0; now DeepTMHMM, https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?DeepTMHMM), and SOSUI (13). ARAGORN (v.1.2.38) (14) and tRNAscan-SE (v.2.0) (15) did not reveal any putative tRNA or transfer messenger RNAs.
Annotation data were compiled using PECAAN (https://discover.kbrinsgd.org) and DNA Master (v.5.23.3) [cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu (16)]. Default settings were used for all software. A total of 69 genes were identified, 35 of which cannot be assigned a predicted function. All but two of London’s genes are transcribed in the forward direction. The left half of the genome contains conserved structural and assembly genes, while the remainder of the genome contains genes with various hypothesized enzymatic functions supporting DNA replication and a predicted temperate lifestyle, including a serine integrase. The overall genome structure of London is consistent with those of other AZ1 phage, including the right half of the genome consisting of multiple small genes of no known function.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Biology Department at Virginia State University for funding; Dr. Kurt Williamson at The College of William & Mary for providing Transmission Electron Microscopy; Daniel Russell and Rebecca Garlena at the Pittsburgh Bacteriophage Institute for genome sequencing and assembly; and Debbie Jacobs-Sera, Graham Hatfull, and Viknesh Sivanathan for support through the SEA-PHAGES program.
Contributor Information
Andrea R. Beyer, Email: abeyer@vsu.edu.
Simon Roux, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA .
DATA AVAILABILITY
London is available at GenBank with accession number MT889366 and Sequence Read Archive number SRX20916067.
REFERENCES
- 1. Funke G, Hutson RA, Bernard KA, Pfyffer GE, Wauters G, Collins MD. 1996. Isolation of Arthrobacter spp. from clinical specimens and description of Arthrobacter cumminsii sp. nov. and Arthrobacter woluwensis sp. nov. J Clin Microbiol 34:2356–2363. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.10.2356-2363.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Poxleitner M, Pope W, Jacobs-Sera D, Sivanathan V, Hatfull GF. 2018. HHMI SEA- PHAGES Phage Discovery Guide. Howard hughes medical institute, Chevy Chase, MD. Available from: https://seaphagesphagediscoveryguide.helpdocsonline.com/home [Google Scholar]
- 3. Russell DA. 2018. Sequencing, assembling, and finishing complete bacteriophage genomes, p 109–125. In Clokie MRJ, Kropinski AM, Lavigne R (ed), Bacteriophages: methods and protocols. Springer, New York, NY. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Miyazatawa S, Hosoyama A, Tsuchikane K, Katsumata H, Yamazaki S, Fujita N. 2023. Data from “Arthrobacter Globiformis NBRC 12137, whole genome shotgun sequencing project. GenBank. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/BAEG00000000.1 (accession no.BAEG01000000
- 5. Mavrich TN, Hatfull GF. 2017. Bacteriophage evolution differs by host, lifestyle and genome. Nat Microbiol 2:17112. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2017. Phagesdb: the actinobacteriophage database. Bioinformatics 33:784–786. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Besemer J, Borodovsky M. 2005. Genemark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W451–4. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Marchler-Bauer A, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Geer LY, Geer RC, He J, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Lanczycki CJ, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang Z, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zheng C, Bryant SH. 2015. CDD: NCBI's conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D222–D226. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hirokawa T, Boon-Chieng S, Mitaku S. 1998. SOSUI: Classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 14:378–379. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.4.378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chan PP, Lowe TM. 2019. tRNAscan-SE: searching for tRNA genes in genomic sequences. Methods Mol Biol 1962:1–14. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D. 2018. Annotation of bacteriophage genome sequences using DNA master: an overview. Methods Mol Biol 1681:217–229. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
London is available at GenBank with accession number MT889366 and Sequence Read Archive number SRX20916067.