Abstract
Diploid A-genome wheat (einkorn wheat) presents a nutrition-rich option as an ancient grain crop and a resource for the improvement of bread wheat against abiotic and biotic stresses. Realizing the importance of this wheat species, reference-level assemblies of two einkorn wheat accessions were generated (wild and domesticated). This work reports an einkorn genome database that provides an interface to the cereals research community to perform comparative genomics, applied genetics and breeding research. It features queries for annotated genes, the use of a recent genome browser release, and the ability to search for sequence alignments using a modern BLAST interface. Other features include a comparison of reference einkorn assemblies with other wheat cultivars through genomic synteny visualization and an alignment visualization tool for BLAST results. Altogether, this resource will help wheat research and breeding.
Database URL https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/GG3/pangenome
Introduction
Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) is an important staple and the most widely grown food crop in the world. Bread wheat has a hexaploid genome with three subgenomes (ABD) (1). The polyploid journey for hexaploid bread wheat started with a polyploidization event between Triticum urartu (A genome) and an Aegilops speltoides-related species (B genome) that resulted in tetraploid wild T. turgidum ssp. dicoccoides (wild emmer, AB genome). The second polyploidization event occurred between tetraploid T. turgidum ssp. dicoccum and Ae. tauschii species (D genome) and resulted in hexaploid T. aestivum (2 n = 6x = 42; ABD) (2, 3).
A recent pangenomic study (4) suggested that modern bread wheat cultivars are genetically as diverse as old landraces. However, to address challenges from human population increase and changing climatic conditions, wheat breeders need to find new sources of genes for various traits including high yield and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses (5–7). In this context, wild relatives of wheat are a rich source of beneficial genes and are critical for improving wheat cultivars using sustainable approaches (8–11). The diploid ‘A’ genome progenitor gene pool of wheat has two closely related species T. monococcum [(T. monococcum L. subsp. monococcum (domesticated), T. monococcum L. subsp. aegilopoides (wild)] and T. urartu (wild). As mentioned earlier, these species harbor various agronomically important traits for wheat improvement. Although T. monococcum is not the direct donor of the bread wheat A-genome, it shares high homology with the A-genome of present-day cultivated hexaploid and tetraploid wheat and gene transfers are feasible between bread wheat and T. monococcum.
Einkorn is considered as a relict crop, being replaced over time by tetraploid and hexaploid landraces and then modern varieties. Its gene pool being different from the bread wheat gene pool presumably contains novel alleles. Einkorn wheat has been used as a source of genetic variation for wheat breeding (12). Despite the importance of einkorn wheat in wheat breeding, there is a lack of resources for finding highly reliable genetic and genomic datasets on einkorn wheat as well as its genome organization.
A recent work completed by Ahmed et al. (13) presents an exciting resource for the cereals genetics and breeding community. Presented here is an online database to accompany these data organized in a manner to assist comparative genomics, applied genetics and breeding research. There is a need to supply quality assembly data for the T. monococcum A-genome and integrate it with other available wheat reference genomes and datasets. Reported here is information about a database resource created for the einkorn reference genomes, the work presented by Ahmed et al. 2023 [raw data available from NCBI SRA resource as PRJEB52766 (TA10622) and PRJEB52767 (TA299)]. Annotations and other analysis are available from the Ahmed et al. (2023) Supplementary Material.
Here, we have integrated various tools and genomic resources allowing us to compare the einkorn genomes with reference assemblies of 27 other wheat accessions and their respective annotations from wild, related and cultivated germplasm at a common platform. The goal of this research was to provide easy visualization and analysis of these genomic resources to answer critical biological questions using various tools that have been integrated into the database. This database is currently hosted alongside GrainGenes (https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/GG3/pangenome) (14) resources where it can be useful for the wider small grain cereal genetics, genomics and breeding community.
Materials and Methods
Data Source
The data used and presented in this database is associated with a recently published manuscript on T. monococcum (13). Along with einkorn datasets (two genomes), this database uses publicly available data for 27 wheat lines (diploid, tetraploid, and hexaploid wheat species) and the description of these lines/accessions are presented in Supplementary Table 1. Out of these 29 varieties, 16 are hexaploid (15–19), two are tetraploid (20, 21) and the remaining 11 are diploid (22–24) (Figure 1). For the genome browser, T. monococcum genomes from two accessions (TA10622 and TA299) and their associated annotations (gene structure, function and transposable elements) were indexed and uploaded into the queryable search tool to generate links to the genome browser and a search-based BLAST database for all 29 wheat lines included.
Database implementation
This database has been designed using the standard LAMP protocol, i.e. Linux (RHEL8), Apache (2.4.37), MariaDB (10.5.16) and PHP (8.0.13) (Hypertext Preprocessor). This is a relational database based on a ‘three-tier architecture’ having a client-, middle- and database tier, that catalogs the information related to T. monococcum.
The process starts when a user submits a query through the ‘client tier’, where interactive web pages have been developed using HTML and Bootstrap5. Bootstrap5 is the latest version in its legacy and provides multi-device usability and responsiveness. For the user queries, fetching, and execution, scripting in PHP has been done in the ‘middle tier’ along with HTML, PHP and Javascript. This PHP acts as a bridge between the user and the database. Any query submitted by the user is first processed by the PHP scripts into SQL queries and then forwarded to the database search engine.
The ‘database tier’ holds all the data like gene ids, chromosome numbers, positions, gene sequences and other likewise data in the form of relational tables in the MariaDB database. The query coming from the middle tier is then searched in the database table and the results are given back to the middle tier that processes the results to be displayed to the user. We have used the latest tools and packages for data visualization and analysis. Still, the majority of the online available resources use older versions of tools that have less functionality and features.
Integrated tools and Web Interface
Analysis, interpretation, and presentation of raw data in a user-friendly manner always help in getting useful outcomes. Software/tools help in processing and analyzing data and hence result in meaningful inferences. In the present database, we have integrated several tools which help in data analysis (Figure 2). JBrowse is a genome browser tool used to navigate through the genome and its annotations. It’s version 2 (JBrowse2) which is a recent release (25) and harbors many new functionalities like circular view, linear comparative view, linear synteny view, and structural variant Inspector view (SvInspectorView). Another important tool is SequenceServer2 which is a recently updated and released BLAST engine. It takes the FASTA-formatted sequences as queries and aligns them to the selected BLAST databases. Its output is quite interactive and informative (26).
We have also used a couple of online tools to visualize the data. Kablammo (27) is a BLAST result output viewer. Kablammo accepts BLAST result output files in XML format and will illustrate exactly which portions of the query sequence mapped to which portions of the subject sequence. The other online tool that is used in the database is AccuSyn (28). AccuSyn is interactive software that shows circular syntenic plots of chromosomes and draws links between similar blocks of genes using Simulated Annealing to minimize link crossings. This helps researchers with insights into the evolutionary history of species or functional relationships between genes. This tool requires two input files viz. an annotation file (.gff) and an alignment file generated from McScanX (29).
An interactive webpage has been designed for this database. All the above-mentioned tools have been put together in respective tabs on the homepage of the database (Figure 3).
Results
This database has been developed to analyze and visualize the T. monococcum reference quality assemblies. For this purpose, various tools and search elements have been integrated with the database. The following section will describe all the integrated tools along with their usability.
JBrowse2
JBrowse2 is the latest release of the JBrowse Genome Browser (25). Previously released Jbrowse1 (30, 31) had some limitations like only one genome would be displayed and needed more support for new software libraries. Here, we have used the linear genome viewer of JBrowse2 to show the genome assemblies of T. monococcum TA299 and T. monococcum TA10622 (Figure 4). Both assemblies can be accessed by individual chromosomes. Gene model annotations were linked to each of the assemblies which include gene structure and putative function for both high-confidence and low-confidence genes models. However, a separate annotation file has been provided for only high-confidence genes for those who are interested in high-confidence genes. The annotated transposable elements (TEs) were also associated with each of the genomes.
Another new feature in Jbrowse2 is the linear synteny viewer. This is quite an informative feature that shows synteny between two genomes. Here we have provided the pairwise synteny between T. monococcum TA10622, T. monococcum TA299 and T. aestivum CS-IWGSC ref2.1. Figure 5 shows an example of such synteny between chromosome 1A of T. monococcum TA10622 and T. aestivum CS-IWGSC ref2.1.
SequenceServer2
SequenceServer2 is a recent web-based service application for the display of nucleic acid- and protein-based sequence alignments (26). It makes use of the widely accepted BLAST application (32, 33) and has been upgraded to accept the optimized algorithms in use with the present version used here (2.13.0+). This provides output in a table that can be downloaded. Other download options like XML and alignment format are also available.
BLAST databases are provided for the following genomes: (Figure 6).
Triticum monococcum L. subsp. aegilopoides acc. TA299 (wild einkorn) (2022).
Triticum monococcum L. subsp. monococcum acc. TA10622 (domesticated einkorn) (2022).
Triticum aestivum L. cv. Chinese Spring IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 (2021).
Triticeae groups 1–7 chromosomes are listed individually and are restricted at present to 29 wheat germplasm (Supplementary Table S1).
The concept of groups is interesting and unique; here, we have indexed our BLAST databases in a chromosome-wise fashion (Figure 7), such that a user will be able to search against A, B and D genomes restricted to a particular chromosome number. For example, checking the Group 1 option, a search can be performed against chromosome 1 of all the A, B and D genomes of 29 wheat varieties and so on. Another important aspect of the ‘grouping’ concept is the use of this method in pan-genome analysis to access diversity across many individuals in a species rather than a single reference genome. For constructing a pan-genome, all the available varieties (reference quality assemblies) of a species are considered and hence making a pan-genome quite large. Searching/querying this large dataset can be time and resource consuming. Using the ‘Groups’ only selection, a desired subset of the pan-genome BLAST database can be queried. This will save time and resources.
The use of the web interface depends on many factors, such as the web browser used, internet connections and possibly other computer configurations. The interface provides selecting more than one database for searches, but here we recommend selecting only one-database-at-a-time. If more than one database will be searched, it is best to select the checkbox ‘Open results in a new tab’ located at the bottom of the page near the BLAST submit button; this will allow the original query sequence to be used for multiple database queries. Likewise, to get the best use of the databases provided it is also advisable to only include one-sequence-at-a-time. If one sequence and one database are selected, each BLAST submission will open a new tab on the browser.
As an example, using a sample sequence (TraesCS5A01G000200, a trypsin family protein-encoding gene) a search will yield strong matches in the T. monococcum accessions, with strong matches on the 5A chromosome at the telomeric 5ʹ-end and weaker matches on the 2A chromosome also at the 5ʹ-end, but not so telomeric. A further search of the same sequence against the Chinese Spring (CS) reference will also confirm observations seen with the A genome, and also note similar alignments in the B and D genomes; in this case, alignments were stronger in 5A, with identity ranking 5A > 5B > 5D (the test sequence was derived from CS 5A); and the weaker alignments in chromosome 2 ranking 2B > 2A > 2D.
BLAST results viewer (Kablammo)
Sequence Server provides the BLAST output in an output table. But it is always more informative to look at an image. Kablammo is a tool that facilitates the viewing of the BLAST results interactively (27). Kablammo takes an XML file as an input (which can be downloaded from SequenceServer output) and provides an interactive figure for each subject matched. The query as well as subject sequences can be zoomed-out or zoomed-in for better results viewing experience. This is helpful to detect INDELs or duplications. Other features like image export, alignment viewer and exporter are also available (Figure 8).
Synteny viewer
In the present relational database, we have provided pre-computed synteny results for 29 wheat varieties with the domesticated T. monococcum accession TA10622. These results can be viewed by selecting the relevant variety from the dropdown menu on the left side of the synteny tab on the webpage. Users can have an overview of the synteny between the TA10622 and other wheat varieties. An example of synteny between T. monococcum TA10622 and T. aestivum cultivar ArinaLrFor is shown in Figure 9. However, many researchers are particularly interested in one or two chromosomes and want to look into the synteny of only those chromosomes. We have therefore provided the input files (GFF and collinearity files) to be uploaded into AccuSyn, an online interactive software to view the synteny (28). Users can download these zipped files for different wheat varieties from the dropdown list provided on the right side of the synteny tab. Then they need to extract and upload the two files to the Accusyn website, for which a link has been provided on the same tab. AccuSyn displays synteny between genomes by circularly displaying chromosomes (Figure 9). A user can select one or more chromosomes as required. An interactive figure on the right displays the blocks that were matched between the chromosomes. It should be noted that the same input files can be used as input in SynVisio (https://synvisio.github.io) which can display synteny in a linear fashion which is useful for viewing a few chromosomes at a time.
To assess the practical applicability of this synteny tool, we took an example from the recent bread wheat pan-genome paper (4). In this paper, the authors studied the translocation between chromosomes 5B and 7B in bread wheat lines ArinaLrFor and SY Mattis. As our synteny analysis maps/relates the T. monococcum A genome to all the A, B and D genomes of hexaploid wheat, we wanted to look into the aforementioned 5B/7B translocation through our synteny tool. For this, the zipped files provided for ArinaLrFor and SY Mattis were used for visualization purposes. Figure 10A shows the synteny view of ArinaLrFor chromosomes 5B and 7B with T. monococcum chromosome 5A. This shows the presence of a translocation between ArinaLrFor chromosome 5B and 7B through our synteny analysis. The same phenomenon was also observed with wheat variety SY Mattis chromosome 5B and 7B.
Database searching
In the navigation bar, a search box has been incorporated by which users can search either by a particular gene ID or any probable candidate gene function keyword. As of now, the gene ID and function searches are restricted to two T. monococcum accessions (TA10622 and TA299). As an example, searching for the keyword ‘auxin’ will result in 338 table entries having auxin as a keyword in their function (Figure 11). This table along with the putative function also displays the accession, chromosome number, Gene ID, Gene Ontology (GO), start and end position and the DNA strand.
Links have been provided in the table to view the fasta sequence of that particular gene, to view the gene in JBrowse2, and to view the dashboard summarizing the statistics of BLAST results of that gene with other wheat varieties (from a pan-genomic perspective).
This dashboard provides various statistical informations derived from the BLAST of T. monococcum genes against the other wheat varieties. The statistics provided here include the length of gene sequence, number of germplasm matched along with the individual genomes, length matched, scores, etc. (Figure 12).
A case study
Sr35 is the first gene cloned for stem rust resistance, encoding an intracellular immune receptor of the nucleotide-binding site—leucine-rich repeat (NLR) protein family (34). This gene originates from T. monococcum chromosome 3A. The gene sequence (3151 bp) of Sr35 was BLAST searched against the wheat pangenome using a chromosome group-wise search. Hits were seen in all the chromosome groups except group 4 (Table 1). Significant matches with high identity were found on chromosome 3 in all the 57 genome entities matched (Supplementary Figure S1). However, screening each alignment yielded unique sequences/patterns in different cultivars. This information was particularly useful in marker-assisted selection for stem rust.
Table 1.
Chromosome groups | Genomic hits | Genome groups |
---|---|---|
Group1 | 1 | B |
Group2 | 21 | DS |
Group3 | 57 | ABDS |
Group4 | No matches | —- |
Group5 | 17 | BD |
Group6 | 14 | SB |
Group7 | 41 | BAD |
Filtering the blast results with sequence identity >90% and query coverage >95% (from Group 3 hits), removed most of the non-significant hits, including the B sub-genome matches. Significant blast hits on A-genome consisted of genomes, i.e. T. monococcum L. subsp. aegilopoides (TA299), tetraploid wheat accession Zaviton, and wheat cv. ArinaLrFor, Norin, Mattis, Mace, Jagger, Julius, Landmark, Kariega and T. spelta, after removal of D-genome counterparts. For sequence comparison, we extracted 500 bp extended sequences from the respective cultivars. The sequence identity ranges from 91% to 96% between the Sr35 and wheat cultivars. Supplementary Figure S4 shows the multiple sequence alignment of the Sr35 coding gene with the selected genomes. An insertion in the Fielder and ArinalLrFor genome was observed. The phylogenetic tree showed two distinct groups (Supplementary Figure S5). These two groups differed in terms of SNP and Indel. To demonstrate the similarity at the protein level, we performed gene prediction in the regions, which showed wide differences in the gene structure, with the number of predicted exons ranging from 1 to 4, making these targets as pseudo genes with respect to Sr35 reference. Sr35 seems to have a unique introgression, with missing or pseudo-gene homologs between the cultivars.
A close inspection in the case of T. monococcum TA299 helped to reveal two significant matches (Supplementary Figure 2) on chromosome 3A. Both the two matches were within a 30 kb region at position 770.4 Mb. We then used JBrowse2 to look into the corresponding positions on the assembly with annotations. Both the two regions matched have only a single type of disease-resistant gene, i.e. ‘Disease resistance protein RGA5’ (Supplementary Figure S3). However, it is interesting to note that around this position there are a lot of other insignificant matches that were found which again support the presence of pseudogenes around this position.
The above case study is just one example of how the multi-genome database can be used to compare gene sequences. The possibilities for gene discoveries within the database are plentiful.
Discussion
We have recently seen a surge in high-quality crop reference genomes. This increase has raised the urgent need to effectively integrate and process the data to be easily used by researchers. In the case of wheat, the high-quality Chinese Spring latest assembly is included (35). Also, the diploid wild donor species like Ae. speltoides (36) and Ae. tauschii (37) have been sequenced and the browsable sequences are available at the GrainGenes website (https://wheat.pw.usda.gov). Until recently, a high-quality T. monococcum assembly was lacking despite its importance in wheat improvement. To address this, Ahmed et al. (2023) (13) have recently provided a high-quality T. monococcum assembly. Taking this opportunity, we have decided to put together this assembly with other high-quality wheat assemblies at a common place to be utilized by researchers.
T. monococccum shares a close homology with the T. urartu (‘A’ genome donor). Moreover, T. monococcum being a domesticated accession makes this species ideal for breeding programs and variety development. A reference quality genome assembly assists in identifying accurate alleles for agronomically important traits. In the present paper, we have tried to harness the potential of this assembly and related annotations from a pan-genomic perspective. We have used 29 wheat varieties (diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid) in the database which corresponds to 63 genomes (20 A, 19 B, 22 D and 2 S genomes).
This database has several useful features which enhance the users’ experience in analyzing and visualizing genomes. For example, the circular synteny viewer provides a syntenic overview of the various wheat varieties with T. monococcum. Synteny is an important analysis as it allows us to look into a bigger perspective of chromosome-scale rearrangements like translocations and large INDELS. Also, on a gene scale, it was able to detect gene duplication and structural variants. With wheat’s polyploid nature and its highly repetitive genome, syntenic analysis and visualization play a crucial role in understanding the many important evolutionary changes including translocations and sequence arrangements. The einkorn genome analysis (13) describes the synteny between two T. monococcum accessions (TA299 (wild) and TA10622 (domesticated)) and also with the A sub-genome of bread wheat. However, looking from a pan-genome perspective, it is important to look into other wheat varieties while looking into not only the A sub-genome but also the B and D subgenomes. Another important tool that we have incorporated is JBrowse2 which is a modern upgrade and can display multiple genomes. Along with all the basic functionalities of JBrowse1, JBrowse2 has added the syntenic visualization functionalities for visualizing structural variants in genomes and evolutionary relationships among genes and genomes. Other tools include BLAST search and BLAST result viewer. All of these will assist in querying, searching and visualizing the gene sequences.
The database as presented in this manuscript is work in progress that will be continuously updated and improved. In future, we plan to add genomes from other Triticeae species such as rye, barley and oat. Including the genomes of these members will enhance our understanding in terms of evolutionary and pan-genomic viewpoints. New tools for analysis and visualization will also be incorporated. We plan to update the database regularly, every six months in terms of updated genome versions and high-quality assemblies.
In the einkorn database, the large number of high-quality wheat genomes from multiple varieties, together with highly efficient analysis and visualization tools, will greatly assist the researchers in uncovering relevant questions. Overall, this database is an effort to take the first step towards a comprehensive pan-genomic database.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Parva Kumar Sharma, Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, Fieldhouse Dr. College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Hanin Ibrahim Ahmed, Plant Science Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), 4700 KAUST, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia; Center for Desert Agriculture, KAUST, 4700 KAUST, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Matthias Heuberger, Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 107, Zurich, Zollikerstrasse CH-8008, Switzerland.
Dal-Hoe Koo, Wheat Genetics Resource Center and Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, 4024 Throckmorton, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Jesus Quiroz-Chavez, John Innes Centre John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Laxman Adhikari, Plant Science Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), 4700 KAUST, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia; Center for Desert Agriculture, KAUST, 4700 KAUST, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
John Raupp, Wheat Genetics Resource Center and Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, 4024 Throckmorton, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Stéphane Cauet, INRAE, CNRGV French Plant Genomic Resource Center, 24 Chemin de Borde Rouge, Castanet Tolosan F-31320, France.
Nathalie Rodde, INRAE, CNRGV French Plant Genomic Resource Center, 24 Chemin de Borde Rouge, Castanet Tolosan F-31320, France.
Charlotte Cravero, INRAE, CNRGV French Plant Genomic Resource Center, 24 Chemin de Borde Rouge, Castanet Tolosan F-31320, France.
Caroline Callot, INRAE, CNRGV French Plant Genomic Resource Center, 24 Chemin de Borde Rouge, Castanet Tolosan F-31320, France.
Inderjit Singh Yadav, Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, Fieldhouse Dr. College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Nagarajan Kathiresan, Supercomputing Core Lab, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), 4700 KAUST, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Naveenkumar Athiyannan, Plant Science Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), 4700 KAUST, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia; Center for Desert Agriculture, KAUST, 4700 KAUST, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Ricardo H Ramirez-Gonzalez, John Innes Centre John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Cristobal Uauy, John Innes Centre John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Thomas Wicker, Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 107, Zurich, Zollikerstrasse CH-8008, Switzerland.
Michael Abrouk, Plant Science Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), 4700 KAUST, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia; Center for Desert Agriculture, KAUST, 4700 KAUST, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Yong Q Gu, United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Western Regional Research Center, Crop Improvement and Genetics Research Unit, 800 Buchanan St., Albany, CA 94710, USA.
Jesse Poland, Plant Science Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), 4700 KAUST, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia; Center for Desert Agriculture, KAUST, 4700 KAUST, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Simon G Krattinger, Plant Science Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), 4700 KAUST, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia; Center for Desert Agriculture, KAUST, 4700 KAUST, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Gerard R Lazo, United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Western Regional Research Center, Crop Improvement and Genetics Research Unit, 800 Buchanan St., Albany, CA 94710, USA.
Vijay K Tiwari, Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, Fieldhouse Dr. College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available at Database online.
Data availability
No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this research. The database is available at https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/GG3/pangenome.
Contribution statement
H.I.A., J.P., S.K., M.A., N.R., T.W., G.L. and V.T. designed the research. P.S., I.Y., M.H., D.K., Ch.C., C.C., N.K., N.A., H.I.A., M.A., N.R.D. and S.C. performed the experiments and data analysis. J.R., J.P., S.K., G.L., Y.G. and V.T. provided resources and germplasm. P.S., J.P., G.L. and V.T. wrote manuscript and I.Y., S.K., Y.G., H.A. and M.A. provided useful inputs. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the funding support (Grant No. 2022-67013-36362 GRANT13368004) and 2020-67013-31460 (GRANT12907726), respectively) received from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) for conducting this study. Authors also acknowledge funding support from United State Department of Agriculture ARS (ARS Project 2030-21000-056-000D) to Dr. Gerard Lazo. Authors also acknowledge the support from UMD’s High Performance Computing resource (HPC).
References
- 1. Pont C., Leroy T., Seidel M. et al. (2019) Tracing the ancestry of modern bread wheats. Nat. Genet., 51, 905–911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dvorak J., Luo M.C., Yang Z.L. et al. (1998) The structure of the Aegilops tauschii genepool and the evolution of hexaploid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet., 97, 657–670. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Luo M.C., Yang Z.L., You F.M. et al. (2007) The structure of wild and domesticated emmer wheat populations, gene flow between them, and the site of emmer domestication. Theor. Appl. Genet., 114, 947–959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Walkowiak S., Gao L.L., Monat C. et al. (2020) Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature, 588, 277–283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Iizumi T., Furuya J., Shen Z.H. et al. (2017) Responses of crop yield growth to global temperature and socioeconomic changes. Sci. Rep., 7, 7800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ray D.K., Mueller N.D., West P.C. et al. (2013) Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PloS One, 8, e66428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ray D.K., Ramankutty N., Mueller N.D. et al. (2012) Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nat. Commun., 3, 1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dempewolf H., Baute G., Anderson J. et al. (2017) Past and future use of wild relatives in crop breeding. Crop Sci., 57, 1070–1082. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kilian B., Dempewolf H., Guarino L. et al. (2021) Crop Science special issue: Adapting agriculture to climate change: A walk on the wild side. Crop Sci., 61, 32–36. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Placido D.F., Campbell M.T., Folsom J.J. et al. (2013) Introgression of novel traits from a wild wheat relative improves drought adaptation in wheat. Plant Physiol., 161, 1806–1819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Zhang H.Y., Mittal N., Leamy L.J. et al. (2017) Back into the wild-apply untapped genetic diversity of wild relatives for crop improvement. Evol. Appl., 10, 5–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zohary D., Hopf M. and Weiss E. (2012) Cereals. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The Origin and Spread of Domesticated Plants in South-West Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin. 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 20–74. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ahmed H.I., Heuberger M., Schoen A. et al. (2023) Einkorn genomics sheds light on history of the oldest domesticated wheat. Nature, 620, 830–838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Yao E., Blake V.C., Cooper L. et al. (2022) GrainGenes: a data-rich repository for small grains genetics and genomics. Database (Oxford), 2022, baac034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. International Wheat Genome Sequencing, C (2018) Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science, 361, eaar7191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sato K., Abe F., Mascher M. et al. (2021) Chromosome-scale genome assembly of the transformation-amenable common wheat cultivar ‘Fielder’. DNA Res., 28, dsab008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Athiyannan N., Abrouk M., Boshoff W.H.P. et al. (2022) Long-read genome sequencing of bread wheat facilitates disease resistance gene cloning. Nat. Genet., 54, 227–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kale S.M., Schulthess A.W., Padmarasu S. et al. (2022) A catalogue of resistance gene homologs and a chromosome-scale reference sequence support resistance gene mapping in winter wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J., 20, 1730–1742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Aury J.M., Engelen S., Istace B. et al. (2022) Long-read and chromosome-scale assembly of the hexaploid wheat genome achieves high resolution for research and breeding. Gigascience, 11, giac034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Maccaferri M., Harris N.S., Twardziok S.O. et al. (2019) Durum wheat genome highlights past domestication signatures and future improvement targets. Nat. Genet., 51, 885–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhu T.T., Wang L., Rodriguez J.C. et al. (2019) Improved Genome Sequence of Wild Emmer Wheat Zavitan with the Aid of Optical Maps. G3 Genes Genom. Genet., 9, 619–624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhou Y., Bai S.L., Li H. et al. (2021) Introgressing the Aegilops tauschii genome into wheat as a basis for cereal improvement. Nat. Plants, 7, 774–786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Luo M.C., Gu Y.Q., Puiu D. et al. (2017) Genome sequence of the progenitor of the wheat D genome Aegilops tauschii. Nature, 551, 498–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Yu G., Matny O., Champouret N. et al. Reference genome-assisted identification of stem rust resistance gene Sr62 encoding a tandem kinase. PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1198968/v1 (29 December 2021, date last accessed).
- 25. Diesh C., Stevens G.J., Xie P. et al. (2023) JBrowse 2: a modular genome browser with views of synteny and structural variation, Genome Biol., 24, 74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Priyam A., Woodcroft B.J., Rai V. et al. (2019) Sequenceserver: a modern graphical user interface for Custom BLAST databases. Mol. Biol. Evol., 36, 2922–2924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wintersinger J.A. and Wasmuth J.D. (2015) Kablammo: an interactive, web-based BLAST results visualizer. Bioinformatics, 31, 1305–1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Jorge Núñez S., Eric N., Isobel P. et al. (2020) Using simulated annealing to declutter genome visualizations. In: Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference; The Thirty-Third International Flairs Conference, Florida, May 17-20, 2020, 201–204. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wang Y.P., Tang H.B., DeBarry J.D. et al. (2012) MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic. Acids Res., 40, e49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Skinner M.E., Uzilov A.V., Stein L.D. et al. (2009) JBrowse: a next-generation genome browser. Genome Res., 19, 1630–1638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Buels R., Yao E., Diesh C.M. et al. (2016) JBrowse: a dynamic web platform for genome visualization and analysis. Genome Biol., 17, 66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W. et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Camacho C., Coulouris G., Avagyan V. et al. (2009) BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform., 10, 421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Saintenac C., Zhang W., Salcedo A. et al. (2013) Identification of wheat gene Sr35 that confers resistance to Ug99 stem rust race group. Science, 341, 783–786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Zhu T.T., Wang L., Rimbert H. et al. (2021) Optical maps refine the bread wheat Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring genome assembly. Plant J., 107, 303–314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Avni R., Lux T., Minz-Dub A. et al. (2022) Genome sequences of three Aegilops species of the section Sitopsis reveal phylogenetic relationships and provide resources for wheat improvement. The Plant Journal, 110, 179–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Wang L., Zhu T.T., Rodriguez J.C. et al. (2021) Aegilops tauschii genome assembly Aet v5.0 features greater sequence contiguity and improved annotation. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics, 11, jkab325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this research. The database is available at https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/GG3/pangenome.