Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0285911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285911

Common adolescent mental health disorders seen in Family Medicine Clinics in Ghana and Nigeria

Sonny John Kumbet 1,#, Tijani Idris Ahmad Oseni 2,3,*,#, Magdalene Mensah-Bonsu 4,#, Fatima Mohammed Damagum 5,#, Edwina Beryl Addo Opare-Lokko 6,7,#, Eve Namisango 8,9,, AbdulGafar Lekan Olawumi 5,, Onyenwe Chibuike Ephraim 10, Benjamin Aweh 11
Editor: Nicholas Aderinto Oluwaseyi12
PMCID: PMC10653403  PMID: 37971998

Abstract

Background

Mental health disorders among adolescents is on the rise globally. Patients seldom present to mental health physicians, for fear of stigmatization, and due to the dearth of mental health physicians. They are mostly picked during consultations with Family Physicians. This study seeks to identify the common mental health disorders seen by family Physicians in Family Medicine Clinics in Nigeria and Ghana.

Methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study involving 302 Physicians practicing in Family Medicine Clinics in Nigeria and Ghana, who were randomly selected for the study. Data were collected using self-administered semi-structured questionnaire, and were entered into excel spreadsheet before analysing with IBM-SPSS version 22. Descriptive statistics using frequencies and percentages was used to describe variables.

Results

Of the 302 Physicians recruited for the study, only 233 completed the study, in which 168 (72.1%) practiced in Nigeria and 65 (27.9%) in Ghana. They were mostly in urban communities (77.3%) and tertiary health facilities (65.2%). Over 90% of Family Medicine practitioners attended to adolescents with mental health issues with over 70% of them seeing at least 2 adolescents with mental health issues every year. The burden of mental health disorder was 16% and the common mental health disorders seen were depression (59.2%), Bipolar Affective Disorder (55.8%), Epilepsy (51.9%) and Substance Abuse Disorder (44.2%).

Conclusion

Family Physicians in Nigeria and Ghana attend to a good number of adolescents with mental health disorders in their clinics. There is the need for Family Physicians to have specialized training and retraining to be able to recognize and treat adolescent mental health disorders. This will help to reduce stigmatization and improve the management of the disease thus, reducing the burden.

Introduction

The burden of mental health disorders is on the rise globally. In 2019, one in every eight people, or 970 million people around the world were living with a mental disorder, in which anxiety and depressive disorders were the most common [1]. In 2020, the amount of people living with anxiety and depressive disorders rose considerably because of the COVID-19 pandemic [1, 2].

Adolescents are group of persons with chronological age 10–19 years of age. Adolescence is a critically important stage of life for mental health and well-being of individuals, not only for the reason that this is when young people acquire autonomy, social interaction, self-control, and rapid learning, but also because the abilities and potentials formed in this period have a direct bearing on their mental health for the rest of their lives [3]. Although adolescents generally are highly susceptible to mental health challenges, they receive very little attention, especially in developing countries [4]. Globally, one in seven adolescents experience a mental disorder, accounting for 13% of the global burden of disease in this age group. Depression, anxiety and behavioural disorders are among the leading causes of impairment and disability among them [5].

According to the World Health Organization, common mental disorders such as depression and anxiety account for the largest proportion of mental, developmental and substance use disorders.

Behavioural disorders including attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder plus conduct disorder are more prevalent among 10-14-year olds, while alcohol and drug use disorders more common in older adolescence (15-19-year olds) [3].

One out of every six young Nigerian aged 15–24 is suffering from poor mental health, according to a report released by the United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) [6]. In Ghana, WHO estimated that 650,000 are suffering from severe mental disorder and a further 2,166,000 are suffering from moderate to mild mental disorder with a treatment gap of 98% from the total population [7]. However, the prevalence of mental illness and its burden among adolescents is not known at the national level [8].

There is a dearth of mental health experts in West Africa. This is worsened by the stigma associated with mental health disorders in the region. The World Health Organization (WHO) and World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA) advocates for the integration of mental health services into primary care as the most viable way of closing the treatment gap and ensuring people get the mental health care they need [9]. There is the need to ascertain the degree of integration of mental health into primary care in Nigeria and Ghana. This can be accessed by evaluating how commonly primary care physicians in these two countries see adolescents with mental health disorders. This will help policy makers identify the role of Family Physicians in the management of adolescent mental health disorders. It will also help identify the common mental health disorders presenting to the family medicine clinics. This could be used to increase capacity and training of family physicians in the management of adolescent mental health disorders and will on the long run reduce the burden of the disease which is currently high. The aim of this study was to identify the common mental health disorders among adolescents seen by family Physicians in Family Medicine Clinics in Nigeria and Ghana.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

The study was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted among 302 Family Physicians practising in Nigeria and Ghana. It is part of a larger study with some of the findings already published [10]. The sample size was calculated to be 302 using fisher’s formula and finite correction was made based on the total population of Family Physicians in each country: 1200 and 125 for Nigeria and Ghana respectively. The sample size (302) was proportionately distributed to each country based on their population size at the time of data collection: Nigeria had 254 while Ghana had 48 Family Physicians. The study sites included General Outpatient Clinics of Teaching Hospitals, Specialist, General and District Hospitals and other Primary Healthcare Centers, where Family Physicians practice in both countries. Physicians were recruited into the study using multi-stage sampling methods. Purpose sampling was used to select two countries, Nigeria and Ghana for the study. Family Medicine clinics in both countries were identified through the Family Medicine accreditation lists of the West African College of Physicians, the postgraduate medical colleges of Nigeria and Ghana, and the Society of family Physicians of Nigeria and Ghana’s database. Simple random sampling was then used to select Family Medicine clinics across both countries from this database and all the Family Physicians in the selected clinics that met the selection criteria and gave written informed consent were recruited for the study. The questionnaire was in two parts: 1) Sociodemographic variables of the physicians themselves and 2) Data obtained from the family physicians’ clinic over six weeks. The physicians reported the number of mental health conditions seen in adolescents over the past six weeks from their clinical records. The medical records of the family medicine clinics of patients seen were reviewed by the physicians to confirm the number and distribution of adolescent mental health patients they have attended to and reported accordingly. Other details of the study design and methodology are contained in the published article [10].

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social SciencesTM (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) version 22.0. They were presented in tables and were described using frequencies and percentages.

Results

A total of 233 Family Physicians completed the study (77.2% response rate with a country response rate for Nigeria and Ghana of 66.1% and 135% respectively), in which 65 (27.9%) in Ghana and 168 (72.10%) in Nigeria participated in the study. They worked in facilities that were mainly in the urban setting 180 (77.25%). Majority of the facilities were Tertiary institutions 152 (65.24%), which was either Teaching Hospitals or Federal Medical Centres.

The socio-demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents (N = 233).

VARIABLE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Country
Ghana 65 27.90
Nigeria 168 72.10
Location of Health Facility
Rural 53 22.75
Urban 180 77.25
Type of Facility
General/District Hospital 55 23.61
Teaching Hospital/Federal Medical Centre 152 65.24
Private/Mission Hospital 26 11.15

Table 2 shows the adolescent mental health disorders seen in Family Medicine Clinics in Ghana and Nigeria. Over 90% of Family Medicine practitioners attend to adolescents with mental health issues with over 70% of them seeing at least 2 adolescents with mental health issues every year. The burden of adolescent mental health disorders seen by Family Physicians (> 3 patients a year) in this study was 16%.

Table 2. Adolescent mental health disorders seen in primary care clinics (N = 233).

VARIABLE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Do you attend to adolescents with mental health issues? (n = 233)
Yes 212 90.99
No 21 9.01
How often do you attend to adolescents with mental health issues? (n = 212)
Often (> 3 patients a year) 33 15.57
Sometimes (2–3 patients a year) 117 55.19
Rarely (≤ 1 patient a year) 62 29.24

The distribution of the common adolescent mental health disorders seen in Family Medicine Clinics in Ghana and Nigeria are as shown in Table 3. Depression 138 (59.23%) was the most commonly seen disorder followed by Bipolar Disorders 130 (55.79%), and Substance Use Disorders 103 (44.21%) in that order.

Table 3. Common adolescent mental disorders seen in primary care clinics (N = 233).

DISORDER FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Depression 138 59.23
Substance Use Disorders 103 44.21
Bipolar Disorders 130 55.79
Psychosis 52 22.32
Suicide or Self Harm 71 30.47
Schizoaffective Disorder 58 24.89
ADHD 39 16.74

Discussion

The study participants and their distribution have already been described in another publication from the study [10]. Our study showed that 91% of respondents attend to adolescents with mental health issues with over half of them attending to about two to three adolescents with mental health disorders yearly. This is worrisome, it shows that the burden of adolescent mental health in primary care is enormous. If not attended to, it usually leads to major mental problems including suicide and self-harm which have been on the rise among adolescents [11, 12]. It calls for improved capacity in the diagnosis and management of mental health disorders among Family Physicians. This is particularly so as patients hardly present for care as they are generally stigmatized, shunned and denied access to care by their families, caregivers and the society [13]. The burden of mental health disorders among adolescents in primary care in west Africa in this study (16%) is similar to the Global findings of 14% burden of mental health disorders among adolescents [5] and 16% burden found by Robert et al in England [14]. The high burden found in this study can be attributed to the large number of adolescents presenting to primary care centres as compared to specialist clinics, the fear of stigmatization of mental health disorders and the recent development of subspecialty clinics such as adolescent clinics, and geriatric clinics in General outpatient clinics [3, 8].

Respondents reported a variety of mental health disorders seen. The most common disorder was depression. This was followed by bipolar disorder, epilepsy and substance use disorders with the least common disorders as enuresis, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Psychosis and Schizoaffective Disorders. World Health Organization (WHO) report that 12 billion work hours and 1 trillion US dollars are lost annually to depression and anxiety alone [15]. On a global scale WHO stated in 2021 that “Depression, anxiety and behavioural disorders are among the leading causes of illness and disability among adolescents” [16], which is in tandem with this study having 59.23% of the respondents treating depression. However, a study done in Enugu, Nigeria [17] had Schizophrenia as the commonest mental health disorder in Nigeria. The above study was not done in primary care setting and Providers and stakeholders had limited or no training in adolescent mental health and that could be the reason for the slight difference. The high number of depressions among adolescent can be explained by the high level of poverty and few numbers of specialist to attend to the huge burden of mental health disorder among adolescents [3].

Bipolar disorder was the second leading mental health disorder identified in this study. This could be due to the fact that the most frequent range of onset of bipolar disorder is between the ages of 14–21 years; which falls with the adolescent and early adult age group [18].

Substance use disorder and suicide or self-harm were also prevalent among adolescent in this study. This is similar to the findings of Birhanu et al in Ethiopia [19], Mavura et al in northern Tanzania [20], and Volkow et al in the US [21]. The reasons may not be unconnected to the high level of peer influence, risk taking behaviour and experimentation with substances due to developmental changes and challenges in adolescence [19, 20]. The high burden of self-harm or suicide in this study could be due to the strong relationship between substance abuse and suicide or self-harm especially, among adolescents and young adults [22, 23].

There is an urgent need for Family Physicians to look out for adolescent mental health issues and address them at the early stage before they progress to more complicated forms. There is also the need for policy makers to increase awareness on the burden of mental health disorders among adolescents and put measures in place to mitigate them.

Conclusion

The prevalence of mental disorders among adolescents seen by Family Physicians in Family Medicine clinics are high in Nigeria and Ghana. There is the need for Family Physicians to have specialized training and retraining on mental health issues concerning adolescents. There is also a need to have more subspecialty adolescent clinics in Family Medicine Clinics to be able to handle adolescents’ challenges including recognising and treating adolescent mental health disorders easily. There is also the need for high index of suspicion for these disorders in adolescents when they present. Future studies should seek to establish the relationship between specific variables and types of mental health conditions as well as to establish the background knowledge of health workers in recognition of these conditions. Policy makers should also put measures in place to improve awareness and care for patients.

Limitations

The study was conducted in two countries in West Africa. Though most Family Medicine Clinics in the region are in these two countries, the results still may not be a true representation of the entire region. Also, the study was conducted among doctors. However, relatively most primary health care centres in the region are run by primary care nurses, community health officers and community health extension workers. These categories of primary care providers were not included in the study even though they attend to most of the patients presenting to primary care facilities in these regions. There was an overall response rate of 77.2% while the country response rate for Nigeria and Ghana was 66.1% and 135% respectively. Being an online survey could explain the high non-response rate of 22.8%. A greater response was obtained from Ghanaian physicians. We thus recruited more physicians from Ghana to increase the power and compensate to some extent for the poor response from Nigeria.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. STROBE statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies.

(DOCX)

S1 Data

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Afriwon Research Group ARG of Afriwon Renaissance for bringing young researchers in Africa together and providing the platform from which the research was conducted.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

Decision Letter 0

Nicholas Aderinto Oluwaseyi

5 Jul 2023

PONE-D-23-13066COMMON ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS SEEN IN FAMILY MEDICINE CLINICS IN GHANA AND NIGERIAPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Oseni,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 19 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Nicholas Aderinto Oluwaseyi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

- https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329231166366

- https://www.who.int/europe/home?v=welcome

- https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders

- https://search.yahoo.com/reviews?age=1m&ei=UTF-8&fr2=&p=What+is+the+average+age+for+mental+illness+to+start%3F&q=Emomali+Rahmon&v_t=rs-bot

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: COMMON ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS SEEN IN FAMILY MEDICINE CLINICS IN GHANA AND NIGERIA

General comments: Overall I commend the authors for trying to explore the mental health disorders among adolescents- a vulnerable group of people.

Introduction: Written, however the aims of this study is at variance what was done

Methods: This method can not answer the aims of this study. The study intends to look at mental health disorders among adolescents, yet no adolescent was samples.

Estimated minimum sample size was 302, yet 233 was recruited. Thus, no conclusion can be derived since the analysed sample was not up to the minimum was set that can allowed for conclusion? By the way, what was the power and precision of the study.

A validated questionnaire? No link to this including the previous published work for verification?

“The burden of mental health disorder in this study was 16% and the distribution of the common

adolescent mental health disorders seen in Family Medicine Clinics in Ghana and Nigeria are as

shown in Table 3”- how was this burden determined, among whom, a snap shot of family physician based on recall? To diagnosis mental disorder of adolescents? Without sampling the adolescents using a standard instrument?

“Depression 138 (59.23%) was the most commonly seen disorder followed by

Bipolar Disorders 130 (55.79%), Epilepsy 121 (51.93%), and substance use disorders 103

(44.21%) in that order” -again these are categories of mental disorder with clear guideline for diagnosis/criteria to be fulfilled- check DSM V. Again, this was arrived at based on snap shot respond of family physicians on behalf of adolescents??? This study cannot answer questions on details categories of mental disorders among adolescents, when they themselves were excluded.

The authors urge to have administered standard and validated tools on the adolescents to answers their research questions.

Table 3-how was the diagnosis arrived-based on report of family physicians/hospital records-what of co-existence of more than one conditions.

Conclusion

This research method cannot support the conclusion

Recommendations: Rejected.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript is well written with a clearly stated objective which was significantly addressed. Following the review, it is believed that the manuscript will benefit greatly from a thorough language proofreading. There is a need to be concise with sentence construct throughout the article.

The objective stated that the study seeks to "evaluate" the common mental health disorders seen...This used of the quoted word should be revised as the mental health disorders were mainly identified.

Some abbreviations were used in the manuscript which were not specifically defined e.g WHO, PTSD.

There is a need to ensure that adequate information is provided in "Materials and Methods" section e.g information about the contents (sections) in the data collection tool, how the tools was deployed, validated and the parameters used for the sample size calculation. The multi-stage sampling method should be clearly explained.

Was ethical approval obtained in Ghana? If no, why?

A non-response rate over 20% was recorded. What was the reason for this? Can it be included in the limitation.

In the results section, a chart showing the common adolescent mental health disorder (by country or location of health facility) should be considered (e.g a clustered column bar chart).

What further research suggestion on this subject do the authors think should be prioritized? This could be included in the conclusion section.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: COMMON ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS SEEN IN FAMILY MEDICINE CLINICS IN GHANA AND NIGERIA_reviewed.pdf

PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0285911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285911.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


24 Jul 2023

The manuscript has been revised and a point by point revision attached. Thank you for your comments and hoping for a favourable review of the revised manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Nicholas Aderinto Oluwaseyi

2 Oct 2023

PONE-D-23-13066R1COMMON ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS SEEN IN FAMILY MEDICINE CLINICS IN GHANA AND NIGERIAPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Oseni,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 16 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Nicholas Aderinto Oluwaseyi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Partly

Reviewer #4: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: 1. The method used to determine the 16% burden in this study needs further clarification. It would be beneficial if you could provide a more detailed explanation of how this percentage was calculated.

2. A significant disparity exists between the calculated sample size requirement and the actual distribution of participants between Ghana and Nigeria. Ghana appears to be overrepresented, while Nigeria is notably underrepresented. Moreover, the study's limitation, which attributes this deviation to being an online survey, is a critical concern that could potentially compromise the integrity of the study's conclusions. I strongly suggest further elaboration on this limitation to offer a more comprehensive assessment of its impact on the drawn conclusions.

3. Epilepsy, also known as a seizure disorder, is classified as a neurological disease rather than a mental health illness. While it's acknowledged that epilepsy can predispose individuals to mental health issues, it remains essential to adhere to accurate classification. This raises questions about the criteria used by physicians to diagnose mental health illnesses within the dataset, particularly since it's listed as the third condition with a frequency of 121 (51.93%). Clarification of the diagnostic criteria for mental health illnesses in this context would be valuable.

Reviewer #4: The statement of the problem needs to be included to the background of the abstract. For instance, what problems could be associated with patients not presenting themselves to mental health physicians? The justification for the study should also be highlighted.

Greater clarity is required in the methodology section:

- More detail on how the multistage sampling was conducted should be provided

-How were the clinic records reviewed to give information about the mental health conditions? This information must be provided?

-Even though the authors have indicated that this is part of a larger study, there is still a need for this paper to be able to stand alone and as such there must be at least some information about how the mental disorders examined in this study were assessed e.g. the instruments used to assess each of them and cutoff values. Are these instruments that can be used by any physician or is specialist training required?

Results

-Provide response rate for each country, not only the overall response rate. This would be derived from the proportionate allocation to Ghana and Nigeria respectively.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE COMMON ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS SEEN IN FAMILY_Reviewed.pdf

PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0285911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285911.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


5 Oct 2023

Response to reviewers

Reviewer Number Original comments of the reviewer Reply by the author(s) Changes done on page number and line number

Reviewer 3 1. The method used to determine the 16% burden in this study needs further clarification. It would be beneficial if you could provide a more detailed explanation of how this percentage was calculated. Clarification provided Page 7,

Line 138

2. A significant disparity exists between the calculated sample size requirement and the actual distribution of participants between Ghana and Nigeria. Ghana appears to be overrepresented, while Nigeria is notably underrepresented. Moreover, the study's limitation, which attributes this deviation to being an online survey, is a critical concern that could potentially compromise the integrity of the study's conclusions. I strongly suggest further elaboration on this limitation to offer a more comprehensive assessment of its impact on the drawn conclusions. Reason elaborated more in the limitation Page 11,

Line 221;

Page 12,

Line 223

3. Epilepsy, also known as a seizure disorder, is classified as a neurological disease rather than a mental health illness. While it's acknowledged that epilepsy can predispose individuals to mental health issues, it remains essential to adhere to accurate classification. This raises questions about the criteria used by physicians to diagnose mental health illnesses within the dataset, particularly since it's listed as the third condition with a frequency of 121 (51.93%). Clarification of the diagnostic criteria for mental health illnesses in this context would be valuable. Thank you. Epilepsy removed as it is a neurological disorder as highlighted by the reviewer.

It was initially added based on findings of a study on mental and neurological disorders in Ghana. Page 8,

Line 145, 147

(Table 3);

Page 9,

Line 174;

Page 10,

Line 183

Reviewer 4 - The statement of the problem needs to be included to the background of the abstract. For instance, what problems could be associated with patients not presenting themselves to mental health physicians? Included in the abstract Page 2,

Line 29

The justification for the study should also be highlighted. Justification highlighted. Page 4,

Line 83

Greater clarity is required in the methodology section:

- More detail on how the multistage sampling was conducted should be provided Details of the multistage sampling provided Page 5,

Line 104

-How were the clinic records reviewed to give information about the mental health conditions? This information must be provided? The records were reviewed by the physicians to confirm the no of mental health patients they have attended to. Page 6,

Line 113

-Even though the authors have indicated that this is part of a larger study, there is still a need for this paper to be able to stand alone and as such there must be at least some information about how the mental disorders examined in this study were assessed e.g. the instruments used to assess each of them and cutoff values. Are these instruments that can be used by any physician or is specialist training required? Done Page 5,

Line 104;

Page 6,

Line 113

Results

-Provide response rate for each country, not only the overall response rate. This would be derived from the proportionate allocation to Ghana and Nigeria respectively. Country response rate included Page 6,

Line 126

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewer1.docx

Decision Letter 2

Nicholas Aderinto Oluwaseyi

31 Oct 2023

COMMON ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS SEEN IN FAMILY MEDICINE CLINICS IN GHANA AND NIGERIA

PONE-D-23-13066R2

Dear Dr. Oseni,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Nicholas Aderinto Oluwaseyi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Nicholas Aderinto Oluwaseyi

7 Nov 2023

PONE-D-23-13066R2

Common Adolescent Mental Health Disorders Seen in Family Medicine Clinics in Ghana and Nigeria

Dear Dr. Oseni:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Nicholas Aderinto Oluwaseyi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. STROBE statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Data

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: COMMON ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS SEEN IN FAMILY MEDICINE CLINICS IN GHANA AND NIGERIA_reviewed.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE COMMON ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS SEEN IN FAMILY_Reviewed.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewer1.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES