Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294316

Campomanesia adamantium O Berg. fruit, native to Brazil, can protect against oxidative stress and promote longevity

Laura Costa Alves de Araújo 1, Natasha Rios Leite 1, Paola dos Santos da Rocha 1, Debora da Silva Baldivia 1, Danielle Araujo Agarrayua 2, Daiana Silva Ávila 2, Denise Brentan da Silva 3, Carlos Alexandre Carollo 3, Jaqueline Ferreira Campos 1, Kely de Picoli Souza 1, Edson Lucas dos Santos 1,*
Editor: Manoj Kumar4
PMCID: PMC10653513  PMID: 37972127

Abstract

Campomanesia adamantium O. Berg. is a fruit tree species native to the Brazilian Cerrado biome whose fruits are consumed raw by the population. The present study determined the chemical composition of the C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA) and investigated its in vitro antioxidant potential and its biological effects in a Caenorhabditis elegans model. The chemical profile obtained by LC-DAD-MS identified 27 compounds, including phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and organic carboxylic acids, in addition to antioxidant lipophilic pigments and ascorbic acid. The in vitro antioxidant activity was analysed by the radical scavenging method. In vivo, FPCA showed no acute reproductive or locomotor toxicity. It promoted protection against thermal and oxidative stress and increased the lifespan of C. elegans. It also upregulated the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase and glutathione S-transferase and activated the transcription factor DAF-16. These results provide unprecedented in vitro and in vivo evidence for the potential functional use of FPCA in the prevention of oxidative stress and promotion of longevity.

Introduction

The Cerrado is a global biodiversity hotspot, being recognized as the richest tropical savanna in the world and housing approximately 12,000 species of native plants that have been catalogued, several of which have a strong cultural and economic impact on local communities [1]. Timber, dyeing, ornamental, medicinal, and food species stand out for their regional relevance. Food plant genera have different species that produce edible fruits, with varied shapes, attractive colours, and characteristic flavours [2, 3].

The fruit species of the Cerrado have many and diverse bioactive compounds, and these compounds can be beneficial to human health, representing a potential source of food with functional properties to be incorporated into the diet or to be used in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries [3, 4]. The fruits are considered excellent sources of natural antioxidant compounds that are important constituents of the human diet. Those compounds are a heterogeneous group of molecules that can donate hydrogen atoms or electrons, and their stable intermediate radicals prevent the oxidation of molecules in the body [5]. The benefits of fruit consumption can be attributed to the presence of specific compounds, such as minerals, fibres, vitamins, phenolic compounds, and flavonoids. All these nutrients are closely correlated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular and chronic diseases [68]. The biological activities of a given food are associated with synergistic or antagonistic biochemical interactions between nutrients, promoting physiological responses capable of modulating metabolism in oxidative stress processes [9]. Thus, foods that act in signalling pathways capable of minimizing oxidative stress can modulate and delay the progression of ageing [1012].

Among these native fruits is Campomanesia adamantium O. Berg (Myrtaceae), a fruit tree species found in various regions, especially the Cerrado. It is popularly known as guavira or gabiroba. The fruits produced by this species are available for a short time during the year, which hinders their production and commercialization.

In folk medicine, the leaves and fruits of C. adamantium are used as antirheumatic, antidiarrhoeal, hypocholesterolaemic and anti-inflammatory agents [13]. Scientifically, different parts of this plant have already been described because they have different pharmacological properties. The leaves and roots have anti-leukaemic activity by activating intracellular calcium and caspase-3 and inducing apoptosis [14]. In addition, the roots have antioxidant activities in vitro and in vivo and cholesterol- and triglyceride-lowering effects [15]. The essential oil of the fruits shows anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activities [13]. Fruit peels have antihyperalgesic, antidepressant, and anti-inflammatory effects [16] and are also able to inhibit cyclooxygenases 1 and 2 and platelet aggregation [17]. Its fruit pulp is described as having antiproliferative action against murine melanoma cells [18] and in vitro antioxidant activity that protects against oxidative stress–inducing agents in a cellular hepatoxicity model [19].

Despite these scientific studies that demonstrate the functional properties of different parts of C. adamantium, there are still few studies on the biological and nutraceutical properties of its fruits, the plant part directly consumed by the population. Thus, the objectives of this study were to determine the chemical composition, characterize antioxidant compounds, and evaluate the in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity of the C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA); and to investigate its toxicological parameters and its effects on lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Material and methods

Materials

The chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich: formic acid, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, 2,2’-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid, Juglone (5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone) 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol-sodium (DCIP), potassium persulfate, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), quercetin, oxalic acid and sodium hypochlorite; Dinâmica: methanol, acetone, hexane, Folin-Ciocalteu, sodium carbonate, aluminum chloride hexahydrate, ascorbic acid and sodium hydroxide; Diversey: Sumaveg®.

Collection and preparation of C. adamantium fruit pulp

The fruits of the species C. adamantium were collected in fragments of the Cerrado Biome, located in the municipality of Dourados (S 21° 59’ 41.8" and W 55° 19’ 24.9"), Mato Grosso do Sul state, Brazil. To obtain the pulp of the C. adamantium fruit (FPCA), the fruits were washed in running water to remove impurities, sanitized by immersion in Sumaveg® solution (3.3 g/L of water) for 15 minutes, rinsed with drinking water, depulped, followed by lyophilization and storage at -80°C. For the experimental assays, 0.005 g of FPCA was resuspended in 5 mL of sterile ultrapure water and homogenized by constant agitation for 5 minutes. Then, it was placed in light-protected tubes and refrigerated at 4°C for 24 hours, aiming to achieve better dissolution of the pulp and its chemical constituents. Only after this period, FPCA was used in the experimental analyses, as shown the following flow chart.

Identification of the constituents by LC-DAD-MS

The sample of FPCA (40 mg) was extracted with methanol and deionized water added 0.1% formic acid (7:3, v/v) (3 mL) for 15 min in the ultrasonic bath. Subsequently, the sample was centrifuged, and the supernatant was filtered on Millex® (PTFE membrane, 0.22 μm) to be injected into the chromatographic system (injection volume 5 μL). The sample was injected on a UFLC Prominence Shimadzu coupled to a diode array detector (DAD) and a mass spectrometer (MicrOTOF-Q III, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA). Kinetex C18 column (2.6 μm, 150 × 2.1 mm, Phenomenex) was used for analyses, applying a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min and oven temperature of 50°C. The mobile phase was composed of deionized water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B), both added 0.1% formic acid (v/v), and the following gradient elution profile was applied: 0–2 min 3% B, 2–25 min 3–25% B, 25–40 min 25–80% B and 40–43 min at 80% B. For the MS analyses, nitrogen was used as nebulizer gas at 4 Bar, dry gas at 9 L/min, and collision gas. The analyses were acquired in negative and positive ion modes.

Determination of total phenolic compounds and flavonoids

To determine the levels of phenolic compounds and flavonoids, the FPCA was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 minutes, and the supernatant was used for the analyses.

Phenolic compounds

The levels of phenolic compounds present in the FPCA were determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method. For this, 2.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (1:10 v/v, diluted in distilled water) was added to 0.5 mL of FPCA (at a concentration of 500 μg/mL). This solution was incubated in the dark for 5 minutes. Subsequently, 2.0 mL of 14% aqueous sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) was added and incubated at room temperature for 120 minutes, protected from light. The absorbance was measured at 760 nm using a T70 UV/Vis spectrophotometer (PG Instruments Limited, Leicestershire, UK). A calibration curve with gallic acid (0.0004–0.0217 mg/mL) was used as a standard. The phenolic compounds in the FPCA were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per gram of pulp. Three independent assays were performed in triplicates.

Total flavonoids

To determine the levels of flavonoids in the FPCA, a 2% ethanolic solution of aluminum chloride hexahydrate (AlCl3·6H2O) (4.5 mL) was added to 0.5 mL of pulp (at a concentration of 500 μg/mL), and this solution was kept in the dark for 30 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, the absorbances were measured at 415 nm (T70 UV/Vis spectrophotometer, PG Instruments Limited, Leicestershire, UK). The calibration curve was prepared using the standard compound quercetin (0.0004–0.0217 mg/mL). The total content of flavonoids in the FPCA was expressed as mg quercetin equivalent (QE) per gram of pulp. Three independent assays were performed in triplicates.

Determination of lipophilic compounds

For the determination of lipophilic antioxidant compounds β-carotene, lycopene, and chlorophyll a and b, 150 mg of FPCA was vigorously agitated in 10 mL of an acetone-hexane mixture (4:6, v/v) for 1 minute, and then filtered using qualitative filter paper Whatman® Grade 4. The absorbances of the filtrate were measured at 453, 505, 645, and 663 nm. The contents of β-carotene, lycopene, and chlorophyll a and b were calculated using mathematical equations:

βcarotene=0.216×Abs6631.220×Abs6450.304×Abs505+0.452×Abs453 (1)
Lycopene=0.0458×Abs663+0.204×Abs645+0.304×Abs5050.0452×Abs453 (2)
Chlorophyllaa=0.999×Abs6630.0989×Abs645 (3)
Chlorophyllab=0.328×Abs663+1.77×Abs645 (4)

The results were expressed in mg/100 g of FPCA. Three independent assays were performed in triplicates.

Determination of ascorbic acid

To determine the concentration of ascorbic acid, 0.5 g of FPCA was vigorously homogenized in 50 mL of oxalic acid. Then, 20 mL of this solution was transferred to a 50 mL volumetric flask and the volume was completed with oxalic acid. The mixture was filtered using qualitative filter paper, Whatman® Grade 4. The filtrate was used to titrate a solution of the indicator (DCIP), 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol-sodium. The titration was completed when a persistent pink color appeared for 15 s. Ascorbic acid was used as a standard control. The results were calculated based on the following equation and expressed in mg of ascorbic acid/100 g of FPCA:

mgAscorbicacid100gFPCA=DCIPFPCADCIPstandard×100MFPCA×(Msolvent+MFPCA)MFPCA×50mL10mL×F
F=MAA50×125×10 (5)

Where, DCIPFPCA and DCIPstandard are the volumes used for titration of the sample and standard, respectively, in mL. Msolvent and MFPCA are the respective masses of the solvent and sample, added for sample titration, and an aliquot of the sample in grams. F is the amount of ascorbic acid required to reduce DCIP (mg), and MAA is the mass of ascorbic acid (mg). Three independent experiments were performed in triplicates.

Antioxidant activity In vitro

DPPH free radical scavenging activity

To evaluate the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) free radical scavenging activity, 0.2 mL of the FPCA (0.1–1000 μg/mL) was mixed with 1.8 mL of a DPPH solution (0.11 mM) diluted in 70% ethanol. The mixture was homogenized and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes, protected from light. The absorbance was measured at 517 nm. Ascorbic acid and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) (0.1–1000 μg/mL) were used as reference antioxidants (positive controls). Three independent assays were performed in triplicates. The inhibition curve was prepared, and the IC50 values (concentration required to inhibit 50% of the free radicals) were calculated. The percentage of DPPH free radical elimination was calculated from the control (0.11 mM DPPH solution) using the following equation:

DPPHfreeradicalscavengingactivity(%)=1AbssampleAbscontrol×100 (6)

ABTS•+ radical decolorization assay

The ABTS•+ (2,2’-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical scavenging capacity was performed by mixing 5 mL of the ABTS solution (7 mM) with 88 μL of potassium persulfate solution (140 mM). The mixture was kept at room temperature, protected from light, for 12–16 hours. Then, the solution was diluted in absolute ethanol to obtain an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.05 at 734 nm. Subsequently, 20 μL of the FPCA (0.1–1500 μg/mL) was mixed with 1980 μL of the ABTS•+ radical solution. The solution was homogenized and incubated for 6 minutes at room temperature, protected from light. The absorbance was measured at 734 nm. Ascorbic acid and BHT were used as reference antioxidants (positive controls). Two independent assays were performed in triplicates. The inhibition curve was prepared, and the IC50 values were calculated. The percentage of ABTS•+ inhibition was determined according to the following equation:

ABTS+radicalinhibition(%)=(AbscontrolAbssampleAbscontrol)×100 (7)

In vivo assays

Strains and maintenance conditions of Caenorhabditis elegans

The nematode culture was synchronized with 2% sodium hypochlorite and 5 M sodium hydroxide. In the sub-chronic toxicity assays, eggs resistant to alkaline lysis were collected and transferred to Petri dishes containing only NGM culture medium and E. coli (OP50) until reaching the L4 stage. After reaching the L4 stage of development, these worms were transferred to microplates containing M9 liquid medium and subjected to different concentrations of FPCA in the absence of E. coli.

For the assays of reproductive toxicity, locomotor toxicity, stress responses, lifespan, and the expression of superoxide dismutase, glutathione S-transferase, and transcription factor DAF-16, the eggs resistant to alkaline lysis were collected and transferred to Petri dishes containing NGM culture medium, E. coli (OP50) and FPCA concentrations (250, 500, or 1000 μg/mL) or water (control) until they reached the L4 stage. When the worms reach the L4 stage of development in the tests of reproductive and locomotor toxicity, thermal stress, and lifespan, they continue to be maintained in plates containing NGM solid medium, E. coli, and different concentrations of FPCA or water (control). However, for oxidative stress tests, SOD-3, GST-4, and DAF-16 expression, when they reach the L4 phase of development, the worms are transferred to an M9 liquid medium in the absence of E. coli, with different concentrations of FPCA.

Sub-chronic toxicity

In this assay, we evaluated the toxic effect of sub-chronic exposure to FPCA on N2 worms. For this, an average of 10 synchronized L4 stage worms were transferred to 96-well microplates containing M9 culture medium (100 μL), in the absence of E. coli and FPCA (100 μL) at different concentrations (10–1000 μg/mL). Subsequently, the worms were incubated at 20°C for 24 and 48 hours. As a negative control, the worms were incubated with an M9 culture medium only (200 μL). After the incubation period, worm viability was assessed by touch sensitivity using a platinum wire. Three independent experiments were performed in triplicates.

Reproductive toxicity

To assess reproductive toxicity, we analyzed the effects of FPCA on the reproductive capacity of worms. For this, the number of viable progeny was quantified during a five-day reproductive period. In this assay, after synchronization, 5 L4 stage worms pre-treated with water (negative control) or FPCA at concentrations of 250, 500, or 1000 μg/mL were transferred daily to new plates containing NGM/E. coli (OP50) medium and water or FPCA at the different experimental concentrations. The number of progeny was evaluated on each plate after reaching the L3 or L4 larval stage. The results are expressed as the average of three independent experiments.

Locomotor toxicity

The effect of FPCA on the locomotor toxicity of N2 nematodes was evaluated in two phases of the nematode life cycle (S1 Fig). The first was the adult phase, corresponding to the period from egg until the second day of L4, and the second was the ageing phase, which went from the L4 stage until the seventh day of life. For this purpose, after synchronization, an average of 10 nematodes in the L4 stage were transferred daily to new Petri dishes containing the treatments with water (negative control) or FPCA (250, 500, or 1000 μg/mL) until they reached the adult and ageing phases. After these periods, the nematodes were transferred to new Petri dishes containing only NGM culture medium, followed by acclimation for 1 min and subsequent evaluation. In the evaluations, the number of sinusoidal bends performed in the 30-s locomotion period was counted. Three independent assays were performed, each in triplicate with 10 nematodes per group.

Protection against heat stress

In the heat stress protection assays, an average of 20 L4 stage worms pre-treated for 30 minutes with water (negative control) or FPCA at concentrations of 250, 500, or 1000 μg/mL were transferred to new plates containing NGM/ inactivated by kanamycin E. coli (OP50) medium and water or FPCA (250, 500, or 1000 μg/mL), respectively. Heat stress was induced by increasing the culturing temperature from 20°C to 37°C, and assessed every hour of exposure during the 6-hour experimental period. The viability of worms exposed to 37°C at different incubation periods was confirmed after a recovery period of 16 hours at 20°C, using touch sensitivity with a platinum wire. Three independent experiments were performed in triplicates.

Protection against oxidative stress

The assay for protection against oxidative stress was performed by exposing the worms to the oxidizing agent Juglone (5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone) at a lethal concentration of 250 μM. After synchronization, an average of 10 L4 stage worms pre-treated for 30 minutes with water (control) or experimental concentrations of FPCA (250, 500, or 1000 μg/mL) were transferred to 96-well microplates containing 100 μL of M9 culture medium, 100 μL of FPCA (250, 500, or 1000 μg/mL), and 50 μL of Juglone. As controls, worms pre-incubated with water were exposed to either 250 μL of M9 culture medium (negative control) or 200 μL of M9 medium plus 50 μL of Juglone (positive control). All microplates were incubated at 20°C, and worm viability was assessed every hour during the 6-hour experimental period. Worm viability was confirmed using touch sensitivity with a platinum wire. Three independent experiments were performed in triplicates.

Lifespan

In the lifespan assays, N2 nematodes in the L4 stage were used. On the first day of the L4 stage (day 1), 20 nematodes per group were transferred to new Petri dishes containing NGM + E. coli OP50 with water (negative control) or FPCA (250, 500, or 1000 μg/mL). During the first 6 days, corresponding to the reproduction period, the nematodes were transferred daily to new NGM dishes containing the respective treatments. From the seventh day (day 7) on, transfers to new Petri dishes occurred every 2 days. The evaluations consisted of classifying the nematodes as dead or alive until the day the last nematodes died. Nematodes were considered dead when they did not move with or without stimulation by a platinum wire. Nematodes with eggs hatched internally or not visualized in the Petri dishes had their data excluded. Two independent assays were performed in triplicate.

Expression of SOD-3 and GST-4

To analyze the expression of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD-3) and glutathione-S-transferase (GST-4), CF1553 and CL2166 strains marked with GFP were used. After synchronization, 5 L4 stage worms pre-treated with water (negative control) or concentrations of FPCA (250, 500, or 1000 μg/mL) for 30 minutes were immediately transferred to microscope slides containing 1 mM levamisole as an anesthetic. Subsequently, individual worm images were captured using an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse 50i) connected to a digital camera (Samsung ST64). Images of 5 worms per group were expressed as the average pixel intensity, and the relative fluorescence of the whole body was determined using ImageJ software. Three independent experiments were performed in triplicates.

DAF-16 translocation

To evaluate the translocation of the transcription factor DAF-16, we used the transgenic strain TJ356 with a fusion of the reporter gene daf-16::GFP, which allows visualization of the cellular localization of DAF-16. In this assay, after synchronization, 30 L4 stage worms pre-treated with water (negative control) or concentrations of FPCA (250, 500, or 1000 μg/mL) for 30 minutes were immediately transferred to microscope slides. To monitor the nuclear translocation of DAF-16-GFP, worm images were captured using an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse 50i) connected to a digital camera (Samsung ST64). The worm images were classified based on the localization of GFP. Thirty animals per group were analyzed, and three independent experiments were performed.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 5.1 software (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to perform the statistical analyses. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences between groups were determined using Student’s t-test for comparison between two groups and analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test for comparison between two or more groups. The lifespan assays are represented by the Kaplan-Meier curve, and the P values were calculated by the log-rank test. The results were considered significant when P <0.05.

Results

Identification of the constituents by LC-DAD-MS

The constituents from C. adamantium fruits pulp (FPCA) were identified by LC-DAD-MS, using UV, accurate mass, and MS/MS data. The spectral data were compared to data reported in the literature and some compounds were confirmed by injection of authentic standards (Fig 1 and Table 1).

Fig 1. Base peak chromatogram of C. adamantium pulp fruit (FPCA).

Fig 1

Table 1. Constituents identified in C. adamantium pulp fruit (FPCA) by LC-DAD-MS.

Peak RT (min) Compound UV (nm) MF MS [M-H]- (m/z) MS/MS (m/z)
1 1.2 Pentonic acid - C5H10O6 165.0415 -
Hexose - C6H12O6 179.0574 -
2 1.6 Citric acid - C6H8O7 191.0212 -
3 9.0 Catechinst 282 C15H14O6 289.0739 245, 203, 179
4 9.2 Procyanidin dimer 281 C30H26O12 577.1389 407, 289, 245, 203
5 12.2 Hydroxy methoxy-phenyl O-hexosyl gallic acid 282 C20H22O12 453.1063 313, 183, 169
6 12.3 NI 280 C18H26O10 401.1471 245, 221, 203, 191, 177, 164
7 12.7 NI 283 C20H18O9 401.0905 301, 289, 245
8 13.5 NI - C20H32O10 431.1948 153
9 14.2 NI 284, 302sh C25H22O12 513.1067 401, 301, 289, 245, 215
10 15.9 NI 282 C17H30O10 393.1798 -
11 17.4 O-pentosyl ellagic acid 255, 358 C19H14O12 433.0438 301, 245, 229
12 17.7 Ellagic acidst 250, 360 C14H6O8 300.9999 283, 245, 229, 201, 173
13 18.1 O-pentosyl ellagic acid 252, 360 C19H14O12 433.0436 301, 229
14 18.3 O-deoxyhexosyl ellagic acid 272, 360 C20H16O12 447.0594 301, 245, 229
15 18.9 O-hexosyl quercetin 265, 348 C21H20O12 463.0900 300, 271, 255, 243
16 19.7 O-pentosyl quercetin 265, 355 C20H18O11 433.0808 300, 271, 255, 243
17 20.3 O-pentosyl quercetin 260, 350 C20H18O11 433.0798 300, 271, 255, 243, 179
18 20.9 O-pentosyl O-methy-ellagic acid 251, 352 C20H16O12 447.0585 315, 300, 271
19 21.1 O-deoxyhexosyl quercetin 251, 352 C21H20O11 447.0938 300, 271, 255, 243, 179
20 22.2 O-deoxyhexosyl O-methy ellagic acid 255, 360 C21H18O12 461.0745 315, 300
21 24.3 Tri-O-methy-ellagic acid derivative 270, 360 C24H24O15 551.1073 343, 328, 313, 298
22 25.5 Quercetinst 265, 357 C15H10O7 301.0355 271, 255, 243, 179, 151
23 30.5 NI - C18H32O5 327.2191 221, 211, 183, 171
24 31.1 O-trimethyl ellagic acid 285, 357 C17H12O8 343.0466 313, 298, 270
25 34.5 5,7-dihydroxy 6-methylflavanone 290, 333sh C16H14O4 269.0821 227, 199, 183, 171, 165
26 34.6 5,7-dihydroxy 8-methylflavanone -294, 336sh C16H14O4 269.0827 227, 199, 165
27 35.8 NI - C14H20O4 251.1288 233, 218, 207, 193, 167

NI: non identified; RT: retention time; MF: molecular formula; sh: shoulder; st: confirmed by injection of authentic standard. All the molecular formulae were determined by accurate mass considering error and mSigma up to 10 and 30, respectively.

The peaks 1 and 2 revealed the deprotonated ions at m/z 165.0415, 179.0574 and 191.0212, which are putatively identified as pentonic acid, hexose, and citric acid. The compounds 3 and 4 showed a band near 280 nm in the UV spectra. Their deprotonated ions (m/z 289.0739 and 577.1389) confirmed the molecular formulae C15H14O6 and C30H26O12, and these data suggested flavan-3-ol compounds and 4 a dimeric [20]. From m/z 577, the product ions m/z 407 and 289 confirmed the linkage of two units of procyanidin (B-type). The fragment m/z 407 is yielded from retro Diels-Alder fission and subsequently loss of a water molecule, confirming two hydroxyl substituents in the B ring of procyanidin (catechin/epicatechin) [14] and thus it was identified as procyanidin dimer. Besides, compound 3 was identified and confirmed by injection of standard catechin. The compounds 3 and 4 have been described from C. adamantium leaves [14].

The compound 5 revealed an intense ion at m/z 453.1063 indicating C20H22O12. The fragment ions m/z 313 are yielded by loss of a hydroxy-methoxy phenyl, while m/z 169 is relative to gallic acid from losses of a hydroxy-methoxy phenyl and a hexose. These data are compatible with hydroxy methoxy-phenyl O-hexosyl gallic acid [21].

The compounds 11–14, 18, 20–21, and 24 showed UV spectra similar to ellagic acid (λmax ≈260 and 360 nm). The fragment ions at m/z 301 are relative to the ellagic acid molecule, which was yielded from losses of 132 and 146 u indicating the substituents pentosyl and deoxyhexosyl [14, 22]. Thus, O-pentosyl ellagic acid (11 and 13) and O-deoxyhexosyl ellagic acid (14) could be identified. These compounds have been identified from C. adamantium roots [14]. In addition, the peaks 18, 20, 21, and 24 revealed fragments ions yielded by losses of 15 u (CH3) from ellagic acid molecule such as the ions m/z 300 [O-methyl ellagic acid- CH3]- (for 18 and 20), 328 [O-trimethyl ellagic- CH3]- (for 21), 313 [O-trimethyl ellagic- 2CH3]- (for 21 and 24), and 298 [O-trimethyl ellagic- 3CH3]- (for 21 and 24). Thus, the compounds 18, 20, 21, and 24 were identified as O-pentosyl O-methyl-ellagic acid, O-deoxyhexosyl O-methyl ellagic acid, a tri-O-methy-ellagic acid derivative and O-trimethyl ellagic acid [14, 22]. The compound 12 revealed spectral data compatible with ellagic acid [22], which was also confirmed by the injection of authentic standard.

The compounds 15–17, 19, and 22 showed UV spectra of flavonols (λmax ≈260 and 350 nm) [23]. These metabolites showed the same aglycone (m/z 300), which is relative to quercetin and they are yielded by radical losses of hexose, pentose, and deoxyhexose (15–17 and 19). Therefore, 15–17 and 19 were identified as O-hexosyl quercetin, O-pentosyl quercetin, O-pentosyl quercetin and O-deoxyhexosyl quercetin, these compounds have been described from C. adamantium leaves [14]. In addition, 25 and 26 revealed absorption bands at ≈ 290 and 335 nm, which indicated flavanones [23]. The deprotonated ions (m/z 269.0821 and 269.0827) characterized the molecular formula C16H14O4, and the product ion m/z 165, yielded by retro Diels-Alder fission, confirmed the presence of methyl substituent in the A-ring. Thus, the data spectral and the elution profile are compatible with the metabolites 5,7-dihydroxy 6-methylflavanone (25) and 5,7-dihydroxy 8-methylflavanone (26) [14, 24].

Yield and identification of bioactive compounds

The yield obtained from the fresh pulp after the lyophilization process was 12.09%. The concentrations of bioactive compounds present in FPCA are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Bioactive compounds quantified in FPCA.
Compounds Results
Phenolic compounds 3972.42 ± 0.93 mg EAG/100 g
Flavonoids 85.13 ± 0.37 mg QE/100 g
β-Carotene 0.062 ± 0.014 mg/g
Lycopene 0.029 ± 0.010 mg/g
Chlorophyll a 0.113 ± 0.02 μg/g
Chlorophyll b 0.077 ± 0.031 μg/g
Ascorbic acid 1454.46 ± 27.17 mg/100 g

Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM.

In vitro antioxidant activity

The evaluation of the in vitro antioxidant activity of FPCA, represented by the concentration capable of inhibiting 50% (IC50) of DPPH and ABTS•+ radicals, are shown in Table 3. The FPCA was more efficient in scavenging the ABTS•+ radical than the DPPH radical, with an IC50 approximately 2.36 times lower.

Table 3. Antioxidant activity of C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA).

Samples DPPH ABTS•+
IC50 (μg/mL) IC50 (μg/mL)
Ascorbic acid 2.65 ± 0.20 1.43 ± 0.09
BHT 14.58 ± 2.15 10.15 ± 0.94
FPCA 210.5 ± 28.0 89.12 ± 0.03

Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM.

In vivo assays

Sub-chronic toxicity

Initially, the sub-chronic toxicity of different FPCA concentrations (0.01–1 mg/mL) was evaluated in vivo. Fig 2A and 2B, respectively, show that at none of the concentrations evaluated did FPCA promote toxicological changes, represented by the viability of the nematodes after 24 and 48 h. From these results, we could safely define the concentrations for the next assays.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Sub-chronic toxicity of the C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA) in C. elegans N2 after: (A) 24 h and (B) 48 h. Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). * P < 0.05, treated group vs. control group (M9).

Reproductive toxicity

The effect of FPCA on the number of viable progenies of N2 nematodes is an indicator of reproductive toxicity. Fig 3A shows that none of the FPCA concentrations evaluated promoted changes in the daily or total number of viable progenies (Fig 3B). These results indicate that different concentrations of FPCA do not promote toxic effects that impair the physiological patterns of nematode reproductive capacity.

Fig 3. Effect of the C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA) on reproductive capacity in C. elegans N2.

Fig 3

(A) Daily number of progeny and (B) total number of progeny in 5 days. Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, treated group vs. control group.

Locomotor toxicity

The effect of FPCA on the locomotor capacity of nematodes up to the young adult and ageing phases is an important toxicity parameter at different stages of the life cycle. The results show that FPCA did not promote a decline or improvement in nematode motility in the young adult phase (Fig 4A). On the other hand, a significant improvement in the motility of the nematodes treated with the different concentrations of FPCA was observed during the ageing phase (Fig 4B). At this stage of the life cycle, the body bending frequency of the nematodes in the control group was 9.95 ± 0.45, whereas in the nematodes treated with FPCA it was 11.30 ± 0.27 (250 μg/mL), 12.05 ± 0.35 (500 μg/mL), and 13.50 ± 0.40 (1000 μg/mL). These are improvements of 13.56%, 21.10%, and 35.67% in the number of body bends compared to the control group value.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Effects of C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA) on the locomotion of C. elegans N2 in the: (A) young adult phase and (B) ageing phase. Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05 and *** P < 0.001, treated group vs. control group.

Protection against heat stress

The thermal stress protection assay showed the protective effect of FPCA on nematode viability during a 6-hour period (Fig 5). In the first hour of exposure to heat stress, the control group had 76.32 ± 3.89% viable nematodes, while the nematodes treated with FPCA at 250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL had viabilities of 93.75 ± 1.83%, 89.46 ± 3.57% and 90.00 ± 5.00%, respectively. At the end of the experimental period (6 h), the control group showed only 2.50 ± 1.33% viable nematodes, while the nematodes treated with FPCA 250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL had viabilities of 13.89 ± 1.62%, 13.42 ± 4.40%, and 23.33 ± 1.66%, respectively.

Fig 5. Protective effect of C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA) on C. elegans N2 exposed to heat stress.

Fig 5

Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001, treated group vs. control group (Juglone).

Protection against oxidative stress

The increase in resistance to oxidative stress demonstrates a beneficial protective effect against the stressor Juglone, a powerful generator of reactive oxygen species. In the oxidative stress protection assay, the nematodes treated with FPCA resisted the action of the chemical oxidizing agent throughout the evaluation period (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Protective effect of the C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA) in C. elegans N2 exposed to oxidative stress induced by Juglone.

Fig 6

Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001, treated group vs. control group.

Lifespan

To demonstrate the ability of FPCA to prolong life, we evaluated its effects on the average and maximum lifespan of wild-type N2 nematodes. The results show that FPCA increased the average and maximum lifespan of the nematodes in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 7 and Table 4). The average lifespan of the nematodes treated with FPCA was extended by 3.5 days (250 μg/mL), 4.5 days (500 μg/mL), and 4.5 days (1000 μg/mL). The effects of FPCA on maximum lifespan were even greater, prolonging the life of the nematodes by 5.5 days (250 μg/mL), 7.5 days (500 μg/mL), and 8.5 days (1000 μg/mL).

Fig 7. Lifespan of C. elegans N2 treated with C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA).

Fig 7

***Statistically significant results (P < 0.0001), treated group vs. control group.

Table 4. Effects of treatments with FPCA on the lifespan of N2 nematodes.
Treatment (μg/mL) Mean lifespan (Days) Mean extension (%) Maximum lifespan (Days) Maximum extension (%) Log–rank Test vs. Control Total number of nematodes
Control 16.00 ± 1.00 - 25.50 ± 0.05 - - 120
FPCA (250) 19.50 ± 1.50 21.87 31.00 ± 0.00 21.56 <0.0001*** 120
FPCA (500) 20.50 ± 1.50 28.12 33.00 ± 1.00 29.41 <0.0001*** 120
FPCA (1000) 20.50 ± 0.50 28.12 34.00 ± 3.00 33.33 <0.0001*** 120

Expression of SOD-3 and GST-4

The ability of FPCA to modulate target genes related to the endogenous antioxidant defence system was observed in the transgenic strains CF1553 (SOD-3:: GFP) and CL2166 (GST- 4:: GFP). The results showed significant increases in SOD-3 fluorescence of 6.33, 49.33, and 54.67% in nematodes treated with FPCA at 250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL, respectively (Fig 8). In addition, FPCA (1000 μg/ml) increased GST-4 expression by 48.66% (Fig 9).

Fig 8. Expression of SOD-3::GFP in nematodes (CF1553 [sod-3p:GFP]) treated with C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA).

Fig 8

Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01, treated group vs. control group.

Fig 9. Expression of GST-4::GFP in nematodes (CL 2166 [gst-4p: GFP]) treated with C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA).

Fig 9

Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, treated group vs. control group.

Subcellular localization of the DAF-16 transcription factor

DAF-16/FOXO is one of the main transcription factors involved in the regulation of genes related to the antioxidant defence system and longevity. In cells under basal stress, DAF-16/FOXO remains inactive in the cytoplasmic region. To demonstrate the involvement of FPCA in the activation of this pathway, we evaluated the subcellular localization of the DAF-16 transcription factor. The results show that all FPCA concentrations induced DAF-16 translocation to the intermediary and nuclear regions of the cells (Fig 10A and 10B). FPCA induced greater translocations to the intermediary region of the cells; thus, the nematodes treated with FPCA (250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL) showed intermediary translocations of 91.67 ± 4.91, 84.50 ± 0.87, and 79.50 ± 2.02%, respectively, while the control group exhibited 55.00 ± 8.66%. However, translocation to the nuclear region occurred only in the nematodes treated with FPCA, corresponding to an increase of 4.67 ± 2.40% (250 μg/mL), 14.17 ± 0.93% (500 μg/mL), and 16.50 ± 3.62% (1000 μg/mL).

Fig 10.

Fig 10

(A) Expression and (B) subcellular localization of DAF-16 in nematodes (TJ356 [daf-16p: daf-16a/b: GFP + role-6 (su1006)]) treated with C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA). Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *** P < 0.001, cytoplasmic localization when compared to the control group. # P < 0.05 and ## P < 0.01, intermediary localization when compared to the control group. ++ P < 0.01, nuclear localization when compared to the control group.

Discussion

The Brazilian Cerrado biome is home to different fruit species with unique organoleptic characteristics, reflecting the diversity of bioactive compounds and their potential for the development of nutraceutical foods. In this context, native fruits stand out because they are considered natural sources of bioactive substances derived from secondary metabolites, such as alkaloids, glycosides, fatty acids, terpenoids, and polyphenols [25] The beneficial properties of different native fruits are associated with their chemical constituents that have relevant biological activities, such as antimicrobial [3, 24, 26], anti-proliferative [27, 28], anti-inflammatory [29, 30], and antioxidant activities [31]. Among the native fruit species, we investigated the chemical constituents and biological properties of the Campomanesia adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA). The presence of phenolic compounds and ascorbic acid has also been verified in another species of the genus Camponamesia, C. rufa, and linked to the antioxidant activity observed by Abreu et al. [32].

In this study, we identified in the FPCA chemical constituents belonging to the class of phenolic compounds, including phenolic acids (gallic acid and ellagic acid) and flavonoids (catechin, epicatechin, quercetin, and methylflavan). Organic carboxylic acids (pentanoic acid and citric acid) and monosaccharide hexose were also identified, along with ascorbic acid and lipophilic pigments, such as β-carotene, lycopene, and chlorophylls a and b. Phenolic compounds are described as the main antioxidant bioactive compounds present in plants, and they can eliminate free radicals and protect cellular constituents against oxidative damage [33]. Among these, flavonoids act through different mechanisms, such as via direct elimination of reactive oxygen species, chelation of metals, and activation of antioxidant enzymes [34]. Intermediate compounds of pentanoic acid are involved in cellular defence mechanisms, inactivating the enzyme neuronal nitric oxide synthase via oxidative demethylation, preventing nitric oxide from reacting with the superoxide anion radical and forming peroxynitrite, which at high levels is associated with the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases [35, 36]. Citric acid, in addition to being an intermediate agent of the tricarboxylic acid cycle in the metabolism of aerobic organisms, is widely used in the food and pharmaceutical industry due to its buffering, anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties [37].

Ascorbic acid, known as vitamin C, is considered an essential micronutrient and is present in vegetables and fruits [38]. This compound performs important functions in numerous physiological processes, acting as a reducing agent in most reactions involving reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and acting as an enzymatic cofactor of the main antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione [39, 40]. The ingestion of ascorbic acid at physiological concentrations is associated with the prevention of heart disease, anti-inflammatory activity, collagen biosynthesis, antioxidant protection against UV rays [39], and increased lifespan in mice [41] and in C. elegans [42]. Other studies have also identified phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and ascorbic acid in the C. adamantium fruit extract and related them to its antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [24, 43].

Carotenoids and chlorophyll pigments are described for their antioxidant properties and are associated with the prevention of chronic diseases [44, 45]. Although humans and other animals cannot synthesize carotenoids, these compounds have important biological activities in reproduction, embryonic development, immune modulation, and ocular tissue maintenance [46]. Chlorophyll, the main pigment of plants, has lipophilic characteristics and antimutagenic and antioxidant properties [47, 48]. Thus, the antioxidant activity of FPCA demonstrated by the direct scavenging of radicals can be attributed to the isolated and/or combined effect of its chemical compounds, since they can act by different antioxidant mechanisms, including promoting the neutralization of free radicals through donation of hydrogen atoms and/or sequestering electrons from unstable molecules.

In recent decades, there has been a growing interest in natural antioxidant compounds that have beneficial effects capable of promoting a better quality of life and healthy ageing [4951]. For this purpose, fruits stand out because they are already part of the human diet. However, to ensure their efficacy and safe consumption, toxicological evaluations and confirmation of their biological properties are necessary. From this perspective, the in vivo experimental model C. elegans is an important tool to investigate the biological properties, toxicological effects, and molecular mechanisms of isolated compounds and/or natural products [52].

The toxicological parameters evaluated show that the nematodes exposed to FPCA did not present any impairment in their physiological or viability parameters. In contrast, a protective effect of FPCA was demonstrated in the parameters of locomotor toxicity in middle-aged adult nematodes. In C. elegans, muscle cells gradually lose vitality, causing a decline in mobility and physiological changes that are closely related to the effects of ageing [53]. Body movements become sporadic from the sixth to the tenth day of life, but adult nematodes with faster locomotor decline are more likely to have a shorter lifespan [54]. In addition, the absence of changes observed in this study corroborates the study by Viscardi et al. [29], which demonstrated that the peels and seeds of the C. adamantium fruit do not have toxic effects in mice.

The beneficial effects of FPCA were demonstrated in vivo in antioxidant assays under heat and oxidative stress. When living organisms are exposed to stressors, such as high temperature, the protein denaturation process begins, which affects numerous biomolecules and consequently their structural and metabolic functions [18]. In this study, FPCA’s protective activity demonstrated against heat stress may have been related to the presence of chemical constituents identified in FPCA, including the flavonoids epicatechin and catechin and their oligomers, procyanidins, which due to their antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties have shown protective effects against heat stress in C. elegans [55].

Oxidative stress is among the main factors that accelerate the ageing process and limit lifespan in both humans and other animals [56]. This study shows that nematodes, when treated with FPCA and exposed to the pro-oxidant agent Juglone, a chemical agent that induces reactive species production [57], were more resistant to oxidative stress, as demonstrated by their greater viability. These data demonstrate the protective effect of FPCA against oxidative stress, which may be related to its antioxidant capacity, involving the activation of direct mechanisms, such as the removal of free radicals, and indirect mechanisms, such as modulation of the endogenous antioxidant system through the expression of antioxidant enzymes that control the levels of reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species [58]. Other signalling pathways may also be involved in this process, given the wide variety of chemical constituents identified in FPCA that can act both in isolation and synergistically.

In C. elegans, resistance to different stresses is related to an increase in the lifespan [59]. This relationship was observed in the present study because, in addition to promoting protective effects against stressors, FPCA increased the average lifespan and prolonged the useful life of C. elegans. Blueberry, another fruit rich in bioactive phytochemicals such as proanthocyanidins, also promotes beneficial effects against oxidative stress, improves locomotion, and increases lifespan in nematodes by modulating DAF-16 and upregulating antioxidant gene expression [60]. Cranberry, a fruit rich in phenolic compounds, increases lifespan and promotes resistance to heat stress by modulating the antioxidant pathways DAF-16/FOXO and SKN-1/Nrf-2 [61].

Among the evaluated mechanisms that may help in understanding the beneficial responses promoted by FPCA is the modulation of the expression of target antioxidant genes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD-3) and glutathione S-transferase (GST-4), and the activation of the transcription factor DAF-16 [62]. According to our results, FPCA activated and induced the translocation of DAF-16 to the nucleus and modulated the expression of SOD-3 and GST-4. The activation of endogenous antioxidant pathways is important for detoxification in C. elegans because these induce mechanisms of protection against damage caused by stress and promote longevity [63]. In humans, the ageing process is associated with functional and morphological changes that lead to the progressive decline of biological functions. Interventions, especially dietary interventions, that promote beneficial effects and positive impacts during the ageing phase can prolong lifespan and promote health.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results show that FPCA has a wide variety of chemical compounds and no toxicity. It has a protective effect against heat and oxidative stress and increases the lifespan of C. elegans by directly scavenging free radicals, increasing the expression of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase and glutathione S-transferase, and activating the transcription factor DAF-16. These findings demonstrate the functional potential of the C. adamantium fruit species native to the Brazilian Cerrado biome for the control of oxidative stress, with a perspective for the development of new products to promote a healthy lifespan and prevent related diseases.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Diagram of the treatments with the C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA) during the different phases of the life cycle of C. elegans.

(DOC)

S2 Fig

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the government agencies that support science in Brazil: Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento da Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa no estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) e Financiador de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.De Castro Peixoto J, Neves BJ, Vasconcelos FG, Napolitano HB, Da Silva Barbalho MG, Silva SD, et al. Flavonoids from Brazilian Cerrado: Biosynthesis, Chemical and Biological Profile. Molecules 2019, Vol 24, Page 2891. 2019. Aug;24(16):2891. doi: 10.3390/MOLECULES24162891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hamacek FR, Della Lucia CM, da Silva BP, Moreira AVB, Pinheiro-Sant’Ana HM. Buriti of the cerrado of Minas Gerais, Brazil: physical and chemical characterization and content of carotenoids and vitamins. Food Science and Technology. 2018. Jul;38:263–9. doi: 10.1590/FST.15417 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arruda HS, Araújo MVL, Marostica Junior MR. Underexploited Brazilian Cerrado fruits as sources of phenolic compounds for diseases management: A review. Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences. 2022. Dec;5:100148. doi: 10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Siqueira EMA, Rosa FR, Fustinoni AM, de Sant’Ana LP, Arruda SF. Brazilian Savanna Fruits Contain Higher Bioactive Compounds Content and Higher Antioxidant Activity Relative to the Conventional Red Delicious Apple. PLoS One. 2013. Aug;8(8):e72826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zou Z, Xi W, Hu Y, Nie C, Zhou Z. Antioxidant activity of Citrus fruits. Food Chem. 2016. Apr;196:885–96. doi: 10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2015.09.072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Heffron SP, Rockman CB, Adelman MA, Gianos E, Guo Y, Xu JF, et al. Greater Frequency of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Is Associated with Lower Prevalence of Peripheral Artery Disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017. Jun;37(6):1234–40. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Perez-Cornago A, Travis RC, Appleby PN, Tsilidis KK, Tjønneland A, Olsen A, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and prostate cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Int J Cancer. 2017. Jul;141(2):287–97. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aguiar LM, Bicas JL, Fuentes E, Alarcón M, Gonzalez IP, Pastore GM, et al. Non-nutrients and nutrients from Latin American fruits for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Food Research International. 2021. Jan;139:109844. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Businaro R, Corsi M, Asprino R, Di Lorenzo C, Laskin D, Corbo RM, et al. Modulation of Inflammation as a Way of Delaying Alzheimer’s Disease Progression: The Diet’s Role. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018. Sep;15(4):363–80. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666170829100100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vauzour D. Dietary polyphenols as modulators of brain functions: Biological actions and molecular mechanisms underpinning their beneficial effects. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2012; doi: 10.1155/2012/914273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Omidifar N, Moghadami M, Mousavi SM, Hashemi SA, Gholami A, Shokripour M, et al. Trends in Natural Nutrients for Oxidative Stress and Cell Senescence. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021. doi: 10.1155/2021/7501424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martemucci G, Portincasa P, Di Ciaula A, Mariano M, Centonze V, D’Alessandro AG. Oxidative stress, aging, antioxidant supplementation and their impact on human health: An overview. Mech Ageing Dev. 2022. Sep;206. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2022.111707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Viscardi DZ, de Oliveira VS, Arrigo J da S, Piccinelli AC, Cardoso CAL, Maldonade IR, et al. Anti-inflammatory, and antinociceptive effects of Campomanesia adamantium microencapsulated pulp. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia. 2017. Mar;27(2):220–7. doi: 10.1016/J.BJP.2016.09.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Campos JF, de Toledo Espindola PP, Torquato HFV, Vital WD, Justo GZ, Silva DB, et al. Leaf and root extracts from Campomanesia adamantium (Myrtaceae) promote apoptotic death of leukemic cells via activation of intracellular calcium and caspase-3. Front Pharmacol. 2017. Aug;8(AUG):466. doi: 10.3389/FPHAR.2017.00466/BIBTEX [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Espindola PPDT Rocha PDS Da, Carollo CA Schmitz WO, Pereira ZV Vieira MDC, et al. Antioxidant and Antihyperlipidemic Effects of Campomanesia adamantium O. Berg Root. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/7910340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.de Souza JC, Piccinelli AC, Aquino DFS, de Souza V V., Schmitz WO, Traesel GK, et al. Toxicological analysis and antihyperalgesic, antidepressant, and anti-inflammatory effects of Campomanesia adamantium fruit barks. Nutr Neurosci. 2017. Jan;20(1):23–31. doi: 10.1179/1476830514Y.0000000145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lescano CH, de Lima FF, Mendes-Silvério CB, Justo AFO, Baldivia D da S, Vieira CP, et al. Effect of Polyphenols From Campomanesia adamantium on Platelet Aggregation and Inhibition of Cyclooxygenases: Molecular Docking and in Vitro Analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2018. Jun;9(JUN). doi: 10.3389/FPHAR.2018.00617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lima E Silva MCB, Bogo D, Alexandrino CAF, Perdomo RT, Figueiredo PDO, Do Prado PR, et al. Antiproliferative Activity of Extracts of Campomanesia adamantium (Cambess.) O. Berg and Isolated Compound Dimethylchalcone Against B16-F10 Murine Melanoma. https://home.liebertpub.com/jmf. 2018. Oct;21(10):1024–34. doi: 10.1089/JMF.2018.0001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Oliveira Fernandes T, de Ávila RI, de Moura SS, de Almeida Ribeiro G, Naves MMV, Valadares MC. Campomanesia adamantium (Myrtaceae) fruits protect HEPG2 cells against carbon tetrachloride-induced toxicity. Toxicol Rep. 2015. Jan;2:184–93. doi: 10.1016/J.TOXREP.2014.11.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nocchi SR, Companhoni MVP, De Mello JCP, Dias Filho BP, Nakamura CV, Carollo CA, et al. Antiviral Activity of Crude Hydroethanolic Extract from Schinus terebinthifolia against Herpes simplex Virus Type 1. Planta Med. 2017. Apr;83(6):509–18. doi: 10.1055/S-0042-117774/BIB [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Santos CC de S, Masullo M, Cerulli A, Mari A, Estevam CDS, Pizza C, et al. Isolation of antioxidant phenolics from Schinopsis brasiliensis based on a preliminary LC-MS profiling. Phytochemistry. 2017. Aug;140:45–51. doi: 10.1016/J.PHYTOCHEM.2017.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reichert CL, Silva DB, Carollo CA, Weffort-Santos AM, Santos CAM. Metabolic profiling and correlation analysis for the determination of killer compounds of proliferating and clonogenic HRT-18 colon cancer cells from Lafoensia pacari. J Ethnopharmacol. 2018. Oct;224:541–52. doi: 10.1016/J.JEP.2018.06.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Markham KR. Techniques of flavonoid identification. 1982; [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cardoso CAL, Salmazzo GR, Honda NK, Prates CB, Vieira MDC, Coelho RG. Antimicrobial activity of the extracts and fractions of hexanic fruits of Campomanesia species (Myrtaceae). J Med Food. 2010;13(5):1273–6. doi: 10.1089/JMF.2009.0047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Biazotto KR, De Souza Mesquita LM, Neves BV, Braga ARC, Tangerina MMP, Vilegas W, et al. Brazilian Biodiversity Fruits: Discovering Bioactive Compounds from Underexplored Sources. J Agric Food Chem. 2019. Feb;67(7):1860–76. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.dos Santos LF, Biduski B, Lopes ST, Bertolin TE, dos Santos LR. Brazilian native fruit pomace as a source of bioactive compounds on starch-based films: Antimicrobial activities and food simulator release. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023. Jul;242:124900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alves CCF, Oliveira JD, Estevam EBB, Xavier MN, Nicolella HD, Furtado RA, et al. Antiproliferative activity of essential oils from three plants of the Brazilian Cerrado: Campomanesia adamantium (Myrtaceae), Protium ovatum (Burseraceae) and Cardiopetalum calophyllum (Annonaceae). Brazilian Journal of Biology. 2019. Apr;80(2):290–4. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.192643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Machado AP da F, Alves M da R, Nascimento R de P do, Reguengo LM, Marostica Junior MR. Antiproliferative effects and main molecular mechanisms of Brazilian native fruits and their by-products on lung cancer. Food Research International. 2022. Dec;162:111953. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Viscardi DZ, Arrigo JDS, De Correia CAC, Kassuya CAL, Cardoso CAL, Maldonade IR, et al. Seed and peel essential oils obtained from Campomanesia adamantium fruit inhibit inflammatory and pain parameters in rodents. PLoS One. 2017. Feb;12(2):e0157107. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0157107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brito TG da S, Silva APSA da, Cunha RX da, Fonseca CSM da, Araújo TF da S, Campos JK de L, et al. Anti-inflammatory, hypoglycemic, hypolipidemic, and analgesic activities of Plinia cauliflora (Mart.) Kausel (Brazilian grape) epicarp. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021. Mar;268. doi: 10.1016/J.JEP.2020.113611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schiassi MCEV, Souza VR de, Lago AMT, Campos LG, Queiroz F. Fruits from the Brazilian Cerrado region: Physico-chemical characterization, bioactive compounds, antioxidant activities, and sensory evaluation. Food Chem. 2018. Apr;245:305–11. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.de Abreu LAF, Paiva R, Mosqueira JGA, Dos Reis MV, Araújo ABS, Boas EV de BV. Antioxidant activity and physico-chemical analysis of Campomanesia rufa (O.Berg) Nied. fruits. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 2020. Nov;44:e016720. doi: 10.1590/1413-7054202044016720 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Qin F, Yao L, Lu C, Li C, Zhou Y, Su C, et al. Phenolic composition, antioxidant and antibacterial properties, and in vitro anti-HepG2 cell activities of wild apricot (Armeniaca Sibirica L. Lam) kernel skins. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2019. Jul;129:354–64. doi: 10.1016/J.FCT.2019.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shen N, Wang T, Gan Q, Liu S, Wang L, Jin B. Plant flavonoids: Classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2022. Jul;383. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tang W, Li H, Doud EH, Chen Y, Choing S, Plaza C, et al. Mechanism of Inactivation of Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase by (S)-2-Amino-5-(2-(methylthio)acetimidamido)pentanoic Acid. J Am Chem Soc. 2015. May;137(18):5980–9. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b01202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jayaraj RL, Beiram R, Azimullah S, Nagoor Meeran MF, Ojha SK, Adem A, et al. Valeric Acid Protects Dopaminergic Neurons by Suppressing Oxidative Stress, Neuroinflammation and Modulating Autophagy Pathways. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, Vol 21, Page 7670. 2020. Oct;21(20):7670. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhao S, Chen Z, Zheng J, Dai J, Ou W, Xu W, et al. Citric acid mitigates soybean meal induced inflammatory response and tight junction disruption by altering TLR signal transduction in the intestine of turbot, Scophthalmus maximus L. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019. Sep;92:181–7. doi: 10.1016/J.FSI.2019.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fang T, Zhen Q, Liao L, Owiti A, Zhao L, Korban SS, et al. Variation of ascorbic acid concentration in fruits of cultivated and wild apples. Food Chem. 2017. Jun;225:132–7. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Carr AC, Maggini S. Vitamin C and Immune Function. Nutrients 2017, Vol 9, Page 1211. 2017. Nov;9(11):1211. doi: 10.3390/nu9111211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mason SA, Parker L, van der Pligt P, Wadley GD. Vitamin C supplementation for diabetes management: A comprehensive narrative review. Free Radic Biol Med. 2023. Jan;194:255–83. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Aumailley L, Dubois MJ, Brennan TA, Garand C, Paquet ER, Pignolo RJ, et al. Serum vitamin C levels modulate the lifespan and endoplasmic reticulum stress response pathways in mice synthesizing a nonfunctional mutant WRN protein. The FASEB Journal. 2018. Jul;32(7):3623. doi: 10.1096/fj.201701176R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dallaire A, Proulx S, Simard MJ, Lebel M. Expression profile of Caenorhabditis elegans mutant for the Werner syndrome gene ortholog reveals the impact of vitamin C on development to increase life span. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Alves AM, Dias T, Hassimotto NMA, Naves MMV. Ascorbic acid and phenolic contents, antioxidant capacity and flavonoids composition of Brazilian Savannah native fruits. Food Science and Technology. 2017. Mar;37(4):564–9. doi: 10.1590/1678-457X.26716 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schröter D, Baldermann S, Schreiner M, Witzel K, Maul R, Rohn S, et al. Natural diversity of hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, flavonoid glycosides, carotenoids and chlorophylls in leaves of six different amaranth species. Food Chem. 2018. Nov;267:376–86. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.11.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.González-Peña MA, Ortega-Regules AE, Anaya de Parrodi C, Lozada-Ramírez JD. Chemistry, Occurrence, Properties, Applications, and Encapsulation of Carotenoids—A Review. Plants. 2023. Jan;12(2):313. doi: 10.3390/plants12020313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Müller-Maatsch J, Sprenger J, Hempel J, Kreiser F, Carle R, Schweiggert RM. Carotenoids from gac fruit aril (Momordica cochinchinensis [Lour.] Spreng.) are more bioaccessible than those from carrot root and tomato fruit. Food Res Int. 2017. Sep;99(Pt 2):928–35. doi: 10.1016/J.FOODRES.2016.10.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Queiroz Zepka L, Jacob-Lopes E, Roca M. Catabolism and bioactive properties of chlorophylls. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2019. Apr;26:94–100. doi: 10.1016/J.COFS.2019.04.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ebrahimi P, Shokramraji Z, Tavakkoli S, Mihaylova D, Lante A. Chlorophylls as Natural Bioactive Compounds Existing in Food By-Products: A Critical Review. Plants 2023, Vol 12, Page 1533. 2023. Apr;12(7):1533. doi: 10.3390/plants12071533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hooper L, Cassidy A. A review of the health care potential of bioactive compounds. J Sci Food Agric. 2006. Sep;86(12):1805–13. doi: 10.1002/JSFA.2599 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shahidi F, Zhong Y. Novel antioxidants in food quality preservation and health promotion. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology. 2010. Sep;112(9):930–40. doi: 10.1002/EJLT.201000044 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gurău F, Baldoni S, Prattichizzo F, Espinosa E, Amenta F, Procopio AD, et al. Anti-senescence compounds: A potential nutraceutical approach to healthy aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2018. Sep;46:14–31. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Guerrero-Rubio MA, Hernández-García S, García-Carmona F, Gandía-Herrero F. Extension of life-span using a RNAi model and in vivo antioxidant effect of Opuntia fruit extracts and pure betalains in Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Chem. 2019. Feb;274:840–7. doi: 10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2018.09.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yang ZZ, Yu YT, Lin HR, Liao DC, Cui XH, Wang HB. Lonicera japonica extends lifespan and healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018. Dec;129:310–22. doi: 10.1016/J.FREERADBIOMED.2018.09.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Herndon LA, Wolkow C, Hall DH. WormAtlas Aging Handbook—Introduction to Aging in C. elegans. WormAtlas. 2018. Dec; doi: 10.3908/WORMATLAS.8.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ayuda-Durán B, González-Manzano S, Miranda-Vizuete A, Dueñas M, Santos-Buelga C, González-Paramás AM. Epicatechin modulates stress-resistance in C. elegans via insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway. PLoS One. 2019. Jan;14(1):e0199483. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0199483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Arantes LP, Machado ML, Zamberlan DC, da Silveira TL, da Silva TC, da Cruz IBM, et al. Mechanisms involved in anti-aging effects of guarana (Paullinia cupana) in Caenorhabditis elegans. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2018. Jul;51(9):e7552. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20187552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang E, Wink M. Chlorophyll enhances oxidative stress tolerance in Caenorhabditis elegans and extends its lifespan. PeerJ. 2016. Apr;2016(4):e1879. doi: 10.7717/PEERJ.1879/SUPP-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Azevedo BC, Roxo M, Borges MC, Peixoto H, Crevelin EJ, Bertoni BW, et al. Antioxidant Activity of an Aqueous Leaf Extract from Uncaria tomentosa and Its Major Alkaloids Mitraphylline and Isomitraphylline in Caenorhabditis elegans. Molecules 2019, Vol 24, Page 3299. 2019. Sep;24(18):3299. doi: 10.3390/MOLECULES24183299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jattujan P, Chalorak P, Siangcham T, Sangpairoj K, Nobsathian S, Poomtong T, et al. Holothuria scabra extracts possess anti-oxidant activity and promote stress resistance and lifespan extension in Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp Gerontol. 2018. Sep;110:158–71. doi: 10.1016/J.EXGER.2018.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wang H, Liu J, Li T, Liu RH. Blueberry extract promotes longevity and stress tolerance via DAF-16 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Funct. 2018. Oct;9(10):5273–82. doi: 10.1039/C8FO01680A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Guha S, Cao M, Kane RM, Savino AM, Zou S, Dong Y. The longevity effect of cranberry extract in Caenorhabditis elegans is modulated by daf-16 and osr-1. Age (Dordr). 2013. Oct;35(5):1559–74. doi: 10.1007/S11357-012-9459-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang Y, Jian F, Wu J, Wang S. Stress-response protein expression and DAF-16 translocation were induced in tributyltin-exposed Caenorhabditis elegans. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012. Oct;89(4):704–11. doi: 10.1007/S00128-012-0760-2/TABLES/1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Salgueiro WG, Goldani BS, Peres T V., Miranda-Vizuete A, Aschner M, da Rocha JBT, et al. Insights into the differential toxicological and antioxidant effects of 4-phenylchalcogenil-7-chloroquinolines in Caenorhabditis elegans. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017. Sep;110:133–41. doi: 10.1016/J.FREERADBIOMED.2017.05.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Manoj Kumar

20 Jun 2023

PONE-D-23-17391Campomanesia adamantium O Berg. fruit, native to Brazil, can protect against oxidative stress and promote longevityPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. dos Santos,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

 Please address the issue and submit revised manuscript. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 04 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Manoj Kumar

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

3. Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, all author-generated code must be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work. Please review our guidelines at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-code and ensure that your code is shared in a way that follows best practice and facilitates reproducibility and reuse.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

    "This work was supported by grants from Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento da Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa no estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) e Financiador de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

   "The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. 

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Author,

Before proceeding further kindly address following issues:

Material and methods:

Material, chemical and other components used are not mentioned in the material methodology. I must be mentioned separately in a section 2.1. Materials (make should be mentioned).

Authors must add a flow diagram showing methodology followed in the experimentation and also show the analysis performed at each stage. This flow diagram will definitely improve the readability of the manuscript.

I am not able to find "conclusion" in manuscript. Please address the issues.

Kind regards

Manoj Kumar

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294316.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


10 Jul 2023

Response to reviewers

We are very grateful for the comments raised during the review process. All suggestions have been analyzed and the manuscript has been modified. We appreciate the suggestions in order to improve the final quality of the manuscript. Below we present our statements, and we hope they are sufficient for the requirements of PLOS ONE.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Answer: The manuscript has been revised in accordance with the observations to meet the stylistic requirements as publication criteria of PLOS ONE.

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

Answer: The in vivo studies described in this manuscript were conducted using the Caenorhabditis elegans experimental model. Ethical authorization or approval from ethics commissions or committees is not required for experimentation with this nematode.

3. Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, all author-generated code must be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work. Please review our guidelines at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-code and ensure that your code is shared in a way that follows best practice and facilitates reproducibility and reuse.

Answer: We have reviewed the provided link and identified an error in completing the form. However, all the research data referenced in the manuscript are readily available.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This work was supported by grants from Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento da Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa no estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) e Financiador de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Answer: The Acknowledgments section was changed in line 617-622 of the revised manuscript, as bellow.

“The authors would like to thank the government agencies that support science in Brazil: Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento da Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa no estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) e Financiador de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP).”

5. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Answer: An error occurred while filling out the submission form, and no information is available to be provided to any repository. However, all the research data pertaining to the study can be found in the manuscript.

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Answer:

The Supplementary Material caption was inserted on lines 852-854 of the revised manuscript, as below.

“Supplementary material

S1 Fig. Diagram of the treatments with the C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA) during the different phases of the life cycle of C. elegans.”

Additional Editor Comments:

Before proceeding further kindly address following issues:

Material and methods:

Material, chemical and other components used are not mentioned in the material methodology. I must be mentioned separately in a section 2.1. Materials (make should be mentioned).

Answer: Materials, chemical components, and other components used in the manuscript's methodology were mentioned separately in the Materials section, lines 80-86 of the revised manuscript, as follows.

“The chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich: formic acid, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid, Juglone (5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone) 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol-sodium (DCIP), potassium persulfate, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), quercetin, oxalic acid and sodium hypochlorite; Dinâmica: methanol, acetone, hexane, Folin-Ciocalteu, sodium carbonate, aluminum chloride hexahydrate, ascorbic acid and sodium hydroxide; Diversey: Sumaveg®.”

Authors must add a flow diagram showing methodology followed in the experimentation and also show the analysis performed at each stage. This flow diagram will definitely improve the readability of the manuscript.

Answer: The flow diagram was attached in the option “others” in the window "Attach Files".

I am not able to find "conclusion" in manuscript. Please address the issues.

Answer: The conclusion is highlighted on lines 605-611 of the revised manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Manoj Kumar

22 Aug 2023

PONE-D-23-17391R1Campomanesia adamantium O Berg. fruit, native to Brazil, can protect against oxidative stress and promote longevityPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. dos Santos,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 06 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Manoj Kumar

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The work presents new results with scientific relevance. However, several points of the methodology should be reviewed and better explained:

1. The main point to be observed is that different solvents are used in the fruit pulp for its characterization: Methanol:water:formic acid for LC-DAD-MS; acetone, oxalic acid... but for in vivo assays the fruit pulp is solubilized in water.

First question: It is already very well described in the literature that different solvents solubilize very different bioactive compounds. Authors should be careful when attributing results to compounds that may not be present in pulp in water, but which have been identified in pulp in methanol, for example.

Second question: Considering that this is a fruit pulp that has many other food components such as fiber in addition to phenolic compounds, was this pulp really soluble in water? I believe it has not solubilized but formed a suspension. This is confirmed when the authors report that they centrifuge the sample to measure total phenolics and flavonoids. And in in vivo assays, is the suspension or the supernatant used?

I suggest making this issue very clear in the materials and methods. When the pulp diluted in another solvent is used, when the pulp suspended in water is used and when the supernatant is used.

pag 5. Identification for LC-DAD-MS. Which standards and concentrations of curves were used to quantify the compounds? Were the others compounds identified using the library and the mass? make it clear

2. In vivo analyzes using C. elegans.

Some points here are confusing and need to be clarified.

Was the pulp suspended in water or the supernatant used in these experiments?

The mode of exposure of the worms to the pulp should be clearer, sometimes it is described that the worms were exposed to different concentrations of pulp in liquid medium, other times in NGM medium.

Also make it clear when the worms were on food restriction (without bacteria) and for how long. This data is very important and can greatly influence the observed results, as well described in the literature.

pag 10 l. 214-215. Here the authors describe that the worms were exposed to fruit pulp or bacteria in NGM medium until the L4 stage. So the worms exposed to fruit pulp were on food restriction without bacteria?

In the other reproduction, locomotion and lifespan experiments, were the worms in the L4 stage of this treatment used?

Acute toxicity.

The authors report that the acute toxicity was evaluated in liquid medium with worms in stage L4 for 24h and 48h.

Have these L4 stage worms been exposed to fruit pulp before on the plates as described in lines 214-215?

Were the worms in liquid medium for 24h and 48h without bacteria?

The worms in stage L4 stayed in the medium for 24h and 48h and, therefore, they were already in their reproductive period. Therefore, they laid eggs and new worms could be born. Has this been taken into account?

The authors consider the 24h and 48h exposure as acute. Considering that C. elegans has a life cycle of about 20-25 days, can we consider this period as acute? I believe it is better suited as a sub-chronic.

Reproduction, locomotion and lifespan trials.

The authors describe that they used worms in the L4 stage. But were worms already exposed to fruit pulp as described in lines 214-215? Or were they worms exposed in liquid media in the acute test?

During the reproduction and locomotion experiments was the fruit pulp kept on the plate? With or without bacteria as a food source?

Heat stress

The authors report that the fruit pulp was kept on the plates during heating at 37°C. Did these plates also have live bacteria?

Heating was performed in NGM plates or liquid medium.

Make these details clearer in the methodology.

In the discussion, the authors attribute the positive results observed to some compounds present in the fruit pulp. I wonder if the authors really believe that a pulp suspended in water will have the same compounds available for absorption and activity as a fruit pulp dissolved in methanol and acidified with formic acid? Can we attribute these effects to these compounds or others that may not have been quantified or even the presence of fibers and other food compounds in the pulp that also have biological effects?

Reviewer #2: Dears researchers. The manuscript are well performed and written. The changes made in the previous round of review increased the quality the paper.

The only thing that I missed was the discussion of other works involving species from the same genus. For instance, there is research showcasing the antioxidant activity of fruits from the Campomanesia rufa species (a native Brazilian species).

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Michele Valquíria Reis

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294316.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


12 Sep 2023

Response to reviewers

We are very grateful for the comments raised during the review process. All suggestions have been analyzed and the manuscript has been modified. We appreciate the suggestions to improve the final quality of the manuscript. Below we present our statements, and we hope they are sufficient for the requirements of PLOS ONE.

Reviewer #1: The work presents new results with scientific relevance. However, several points of the methodology should be reviewed and better explained:

The main point to be observed is that different solvents are used in the fruit pulp for its characterization: Methanol:water:formic acid for LC-DAD-MS; acetone, oxalic acid... but for in vivo assays the fruit pulp is solubilized in water.

1.1 First question: It is already very well described in the literature that different solvents solubilize very different bioactive compounds. Authors should be careful when attributing results to compounds that may not be present in pulp in water, but which have been identified in pulp in methanol, for example.

Answer: The choice of solvents actually directly impacts the compounds extracted and therefore available to the pulp for effective action. Therefore, all studies carried out in this work were based on lyophilized pulp resuspended in water. In this case, all compounds present in the pulp were present in the resuspended aqueous material. The lyophilized pulp was extremely soluble in water.

The attribution of pharmacological activity to specific compounds, occurred only in the discussion section, lines 580-584 of the revised manuscript (“In this study, FPCA’s protective activity demonstrated against heat stress may have been related to the presence of chemical constituents identified in FPCA, including the flavonoids epicatechin and catechin and their oligomers, procyanidins, which due to their antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties have shown protective effects against heat stress in C. elegans [55].”). In the other cases, the pharmacological activity was attributed generically, that is, to classes of compounds.

The compositions specifically cited were flavonoids, epicatechin and catechin and their oligomers, and procyanidins, which are present in FPCA (lyophilized pulp resuspended in water with excellent solubility). The same compounds are also found using the extraction method with water as solvent (Baldivia et al. 2018, investigated the extract from the stems of S. adstringens using water as a protective solvent, stimulating the presence of flavonoids, epicatechin, catechin, and procyanidins).

The preparation of the sample for LC-DAD-MS analysis was described in detail now since deionized water was first added and maintained in the ultrasonic bath. Subsequently, methanol was added up the rate 7:3 v/v, filtered on Millex® (PTFE membrane, 0.22 µm), and injected. Methanol was added to avoid the precipitation in the chromatographic system. Thus, the composition of the sample analyzed by LC-DAD-MS is similar to the samples evaluated in the biological experiments.

Reference: Baldivia DDS, Leite DF, Castro DTH, Campos JF, Santos UPD, Paredes-Gamero EJ, Carollo CA, Silva DB, de Picoli Souza K, Dos Santos EL. Evaluation of In Vitro Antioxidant and Anticancer Properties of the Aqueous Extract from the Stem Bark of Stryphnodendron adstringens. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Aug 17;19(8):2432. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082432. PMID: 30126115; PMCID: PMC6121951.

1.2 Second question: Considering that this is a fruit pulp that has many other food components such as fiber in addition to phenolic compounds, was this pulp really soluble in water? I believe it has not solubilized but formed a suspension. This is confirmed when the authors report that they centrifuge the sample to measure total phenolics and flavonoids. And in vivo assays, is the suspension or the supernatant used? I suggest making this issue very clear in the materials and methods. When the pulp diluted in another solvent is used, when the pulp suspended in water is used, and when the supernatant is used.

Answer: From the fruits of Campomanesia adamantium a lyophilized pulp was prepared which obtained excellent solubilization in water (FPCA). This material was resuspended in water to be used in in vitro and in vivo tests. This has been carefully revised in the text. In all assays, including in vivo assays, the FPCA was resuspended in water, using 0.005 g of FPCA in 5 mL of ultrapure water, as described in section Material and Methods, lines 94-95. Only for the measurement of phenolic compounds and flavonoids, the FPCA was centrifuged to use the supernatant as described in lines 115-116 of the revised manuscript as a necessary methodological adaptation.

1.3 pag 5. Identification for LC-DAD-MS. Which standards and concentrations of curves were used to quantify the compounds? Were the others compounds identified using the library and the mass? make it clear

Answer: The identification of the constituents by LC-DAD-MS was performed based on the spectral data (UV, MS, and MS/MS) and they were compared to data published in different manuscripts. Authentic standards were injected to confirm the annotation of some compounds, and they were not applied to quantify them. The quantification evaluations were performed by methods to determine the total phenolic and flavonoid content, lipophilic compounds, and ascorbic acid.

In vivo analyzes using C. elegans.

Some points here are confusing and need to be clarified.

1.4 Was the pulp suspended in water or the supernatant used in these experiments?

Answer: As explained earlier (question 1.2), in all assays, including in vivo assays with the worms C. elegans, FPCA was resuspended in water. For this, 0.005 g of FPCA in 5 mL of ultrapure water was used, using it in its entirety. As described in the Material and Methods section, lines 94-95 of the revised manuscript.

1.5 The mode of exposure of the worms to the pulp should be clearer, sometimes it is described that the worms were exposed to different concentrations of pulp in liquid medium, other times in NGM medium.

Answer: Worms were exposed to FPCA both in solid NGM medium and in liquid M9 medium, in different experiments. This was revised in the text and new information was included in the lines 209-223 of the revised manuscript.

Initially (lines 209-213), it is described that, for the sub-chronic toxicity assay, eggs resistant to alkaline lysis were collected and transferred to Petri dishes containing only NGM culture medium and E. coli (OP50) until reaching the L4 stage. After reaching the L4 stage of development, these worms were transferred to microplates containing M9 liquid medium and subjected to different concentrations of FPCA in the absence of E. coli.

Next (lines 214-223), the tests in which the animals are exposed to FPCA from the egg stage to the L4 stage of development in a solid NGM medium are described. When the worms reach the L4 stage of development in the tests of reproductive and locomotor toxicity, thermal stress, and lifespan, they continue to be maintained in plates containing NGM solid medium, E. coli, and different concentrations of FPCA or water (control). However, for oxidative stress tests, SOD-3, GST-4, and DAF-16 expression, when they reach the L4 phase of development, the worms are transferred to an M9 liquid medium in the absence of E. coli, with different concentrations of FPCA.

1.6 Also make it clear when the worms were on food restriction (without bacteria) and for how long. This data is very important and can greatly influence the observed results, as well described in the literature.

Answer: Information about food restriction has been added on lines 213 and 223 of the revised manuscript. In summary, worms remained without food for 24 and 48 h for the sub-chronic toxicity assay; 6 h for the oxidative stress test; and 30 min for the SOD-3, GST-4, and DAF-16 expression assay.

1.7 pag 10 l. 214-215. Here the authors describe that the worms were exposed to fruit pulp or bacteria in NGM medium until the L4 stage. So the worms exposed to fruit pulp were on food restriction without bacteria?

Answer: We apologize for the text error. The correct information has been inserted on lines 216-218 of the revised manuscript. The worms were kept in a petri dish containing NGM solid medium and E. coli bacteria, being treated with water (control) or different concentrations of FPCA.

1.8 In the other reproduction, locomotion and lifespan experiments, were the worms in the L4 stage of this treatment used?

Answer: For the reproductive and locomotor toxicity tests, and lifespan, the worms were treated from the egg stage of development. After reaching the L4 stage of development, these worms were transferred to new plates containing NGM, E. coli, and FPCA in different concentrations or water (control). This point was revised in lines 218-221 of the revised manuscript, as previously explained (question 1.5). 

Acute toxicity

The authors report that the acute toxicity was evaluated in liquid medium with worms in stage L4 for 24 h and 48 h.

1.9 Have these L4 stage worms been exposed to fruit pulp before on the plates as described in lines 214-215?

Answer: As previously specified (question 1.5), we confirm that for the “sub-chronic toxicity” assay, the worms were exposed to FPCA only after reaching the L4 phase of development, as described in lines 211-213 of the revised manuscript.

In lines 214-215 indicated, which correspond to lines 216-218 of the revised manuscript, the treatments carried out in other tests are described, namely the tests of reproductive toxicity, locomotor toxicity, response to stress, and longevity.

1.10 Were the worms in liquid medium for 24 h and 48 h without bacteria?

Answer: As previously specified (questions 1.5 and 1.9), for the sub-chronic toxicity test, upon reaching the L4 stage of development, the worms were transferred to microplates containing M9 and different concentrations of FPCA in the absence of E. coli. Thus, the nematodes remained without food for 24 and 48 h. As described in the Material and Methods section, line 228 of the revised manuscript.

1.11 The worms in stage L4 stayed in the medium for 24 h and 48 h and, therefore, they were already in their reproductive period. Therefore, they laid eggs and new worms could be born. Has this been taken into account?

Answer: The posture and hatching of worm eggs during the sub-chronic toxicity test, in the period of 24 and 48 h after the beginning of the treatment did not interfere with the analysis of the data of viable worms. Eggs that do hatch in the M9 medium do not develop beyond the L1 stage due to lack of food. In this way, it is possible to differentiate the evaluated worms from the progeny hatched during the test and this parameter does not interfere with the sub-chronic toxicity test.

1.12 The authors consider the 24 h and 48 h exposure as acute. Considering that C. elegans has a life cycle of about 20-25 days, can we consider this period as acute? I believe it is better suited as a sub-chronic.

Answer: We are grateful for the statement and, although the literature mentions 24 h as acute exposure (Qin et al., 2022), we agree with the observation that 24 and, above all, 48 h would be equivalent to a sub-chronic exposure. Thus, the manuscript was revised and the term “acute toxicity” was changed to “sub-chronic toxicity”, in lines 209, 225, 226, 402, 403, and 408 of the revised manuscript.

Reference: Qin Y, Chen F, Tang Z, Ren H, Wang Q, Shen N, Lin W, Xiao Y, Yuan M, Chen H, Bu T, Li Q, Huang L. Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort as medicinal and edible plant foods: Antioxidant, anti-aging and neuroprotective properties in Caenorhabditis elegans. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Oct 26;13:1049890. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1049890. PMID: 36386171; PMCID: PMC9643709.

Reproduction, locomotion and lifespan trials

1.13 The authors describe that they used worms in the L4 stage. But were worms already exposed to fruit pulp as described in lines 214-215? Or were they worms exposed in liquid media in the acute test?

Answer: As previously specified (question 1.5), we ratify that for the reproductive toxicity, locomotor toxicity, and lifespan tests, the worms were exposed to FPCA from the egg stage to the L4 stage of development in a solid NGM medium. When the worms reach the L4 phase of development in these assays, they continue to be maintained in solid NGM medium with different concentrations of FPCA or water (control). As described in the Material and Methods section, lines 214-223 of the revised manuscript, which corresponded to 214-215.

1.14 During the reproduction and locomotion experiments was the fruit pulp kept on the plate? With or without bacteria as a food source?

Answer: As previously specified (questions 1.5 and 1.13), we ratify that for the reproductive and locomotor toxicity tests, the worms were exposed to FPCA from the egg stage to the L4 stage of development in a solid NGM medium. When the worms reached the L4 phase of development in these assays, they continued to be maintained in plates containing NGM solid medium, E. coli, and different concentrations of FPCA or water (control). As described in the Material and Methods section, lines 214-223 of the revised manuscript, which corresponded to 214-215.

Heat stress

1.15 The authors report that the fruit pulp was kept on the plates during heating at 37°C. Did these plates also have live bacteria? Heating was performed in NGM plates or liquid medium. Make these details clearer in the methodology.

Answer: As previously stated (question 1.5), the worms in the L4 phase of development are kept in plates containing solid NGM medium, E. coli, and different concentrations of FPCA or water (control) which are heated to 37 °C. Although this would be an optimal growth temperature for the bacteria, this is not the case because the bacteria were previously inactivated by kanamycin before being plated onto the NGM medium. Information on the inactivation of bacteria by kanamycin was included in lines 260 of the Materials and Methods section, a revised version of the manuscript.

1.16 In the discussion, the authors attribute the positive results observed to some compounds present in the fruit pulp. I wonder if the authors really believe that a pulp suspended in water will have the same compounds available for absorption and activity as a fruit pulp dissolved in methanol and acidified with formic acid? Can we attribute these effects to these compounds or others that may not have been quantified or even the presence of fibers and other food compounds in the pulp that also have biological effects?

Answer: The mentioned reagents methanol and formic acid were used only for the chemical analysis by LC-DAD-MS. The pharmacological activities observed in this study result from the FPCA, that is, from the constituents present in the FPCA.

Reviewer #2: Dears researchers. The manuscript are well performed and written. The changes made in the previous round of review increased the quality the paper.

The only thing that I missed was the discussion of other works involving species from the same genus. For instance, there is research showcasing the antioxidant activity of fruits from the Campomanesia rufa species (a native Brazilian species).

Answer: We thank you for the observation. The information was included in the discussion section, lines 521-524 of the revised manuscript as described below:

“The presence of phenolic compounds and ascorbic acid has also been verified in another species of the genus Camponamesia, C. rufa, and linked to the antioxidant activity observed by Abreu et al. [32].”

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Manoj Kumar

15 Oct 2023

PONE-D-23-17391R2Campomanesia adamantium O Berg. fruit, native to Brazil, can protect against oxidative stress and promote longevityPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. dos Santos,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR:I have noted the authors' considerable efforts in revising the manuscript. However, the main body of the manuscript is lacking the inclusion of a flow chart. It is essential to incorporate the flow chart into the main body, preferably within the Materials and Methodology section. Additionally, the conclusion requires further elaboration in accordance with the study's findings, and it should outline potential future directions for the research.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 29 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Manoj Kumar

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

I have noted the authors' considerable efforts in revising the manuscript. However, the main body of the manuscript is lacking the inclusion of a flow chart. It is essential to incorporate the flow chart into the main body, preferably within the Materials and Methodology section. Additionally, the conclusion requires further elaboration in accordance with the study's findings, and it should outline potential future directions for the research.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294316.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


18 Oct 2023

Response to academic editor

We are very grateful for the comments raised during the review process. All suggestions made throughout the review process have been analyzed, and the manuscript has been modified. We appreciate the suggestions to improve the manuscript's final quality. Below we present our statements, and we hope they are sufficient for the requirements of PLOS ONE.

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

I have noted the authors' considerable efforts in revising the manuscript.

1. However, the main body of the manuscript is lacking the inclusion of a flow chart. It is essential to incorporate the flow chart into the main body, preferably within the Materials and Methodology section.

Answer: The flow chart was previously submitted as a response to the reviewers, but in the current version, it has been included in the main body within the Materials and Methodology section, line 98, of the revised manuscript.

2. Additionally, the conclusion requires further elaboration in accordance with the study's findings, and it should outline potential future directions for the research.

Answer: Potential future research directions have been included in the conclusion of the revised manuscript, lines 622-624.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 3

Manoj Kumar

31 Oct 2023

Campomanesia adamantium O Berg. fruit, native to Brazil, can protect against oxidative stress and promote longevity

PONE-D-23-17391R3

Dear Dr. Santos,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Manoj Kumar

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Manoj Kumar

8 Nov 2023

PONE-D-23-17391R3

Campomanesia adamantium O Berg. fruit, native to Brazil, can protect against oxidative stress and promote longevity

Dear Dr. dos Santos:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Manoj Kumar

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Diagram of the treatments with the C. adamantium fruit pulp (FPCA) during the different phases of the life cycle of C. elegans.

    (DOC)

    S2 Fig

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES