Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2023 Oct 6;14(5):e01536-23. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23

PlzD modifies Vibrio vulnificus foraging behavior and virulence in response to elevated c-di-GMP

Tianyi Chen 1,2, Meng Pu 2, Sundharraman Subramanian 3, Dan Kearns 1, Dean Rowe-Magnus 1,4,
Editors: Edward G Ruby5, Christopher M Waters6
PMCID: PMC10653909  PMID: 37800901

ABSTRACT

Some marine bacteria can swim at speeds exceeding 50× their body length per second as they actively seek out fleeting microscale nutrient patches. Yet, even in vast marine environments, most micro-organisms live in surface-associated biofilm communities. Such astonishing speeds can pose a serious challenge to initiating biofilm formation, and our understanding of the mechanisms that regulate deceleration is lacking. Calcium, a major constituent of marine ecosystems, promotes biofilm formation in the marine bacterium and opportunistic human pathogen Vibrio vulnificus by increasing cellular levels of the key secondary signaling molecule bis-(3´-5´)-cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP). Here, we show that elevated c-di-GMP levels inhibit V. vulnificus swimming motility and identify a PilZ domain protein, PlzD, that mediates this effect. PlzD is localized at the flagellar pole in slow-moving, initially adherent, and mature biofilm cells. This positioning was partly dependent on the flagellar stator protein PomA and was regulated by c-di-GMP. Mutating the conserved RXXXR c-di-GMP binding motif of the PilZ domain abrogated PlzD activity. Single-cell tracking of bacterial swimming trajectories revealed that PlzD altered the foraging behavior of cells by slowing swimming speed and by decreasing the number of directional changes, ultimately limiting exploration of the surrounding 3D space. The cumulative effects were increased biofilm formation, aggregation, oyster colonization, and attenuated virulence in mice, phenotypes underpinning the evolution of V. vulnificus as a resilient environmental organism and potent human pathogen.

IMPORTANCE

Many free-swimming bacteria propel themselves through liquid using rotary flagella, and mounting evidence suggests that the inhibition of flagellar rotation initiates biofilm formation, a sessile lifestyle that is a nearly universal surface colonization paradigm in bacteria. In general, motility and biofilm formation are inversely regulated by the intracellular second messenger bis-(3´-5´)-cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP). Here, we identify a protein, PlzD, bearing a conserved c-di-GMP binding PilZ domain that localizes to the flagellar pole in a c-di-GMP-dependent manner and alters the foraging behavior, biofilm, and virulence characteristics of the opportunistic human pathogen, Vibrio vulnificus. Our data suggest that PlzD interacts with components of the flagellar stator to decrease bacterial swimming speed and changes in swimming direction, and these activities are enhanced when cellular c-di-GMP levels are elevated. These results reveal a physical link between a second messenger (c-di-GMP) and an effector (PlzD) that promotes transition from a motile to a sessile state in V. vulnificus.

KEYWORDS: c-di-GMP, biofilms, Vibrio vulnificus, flagellar motility

INTRODUCTION

Biofilm formation, where micro-organisms live in surface-associated communities that are sheathed in a protective matrix of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS), proteins, and DNA (1, 2), is an ancient and universal survival mechanism that increases access to nutritional resources, provides protection from environmental insults and predation, and underscores environmental persistence (3, 4), symbiosis (5), lateral gene transfer (6), and the establishment of chronic infections (4).

The secondary signaling molecule bis-(3´-5´)-cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP) is a key regulator of biofilm formation (7 9). It is synthesized by diguanylate cyclases (DGC) bearing a Gly–Gly–Asp–Glu–Phe (GGDEF) domain and degraded by phosphodiesterases (PDEs) containing Glu–Ala–Leu (EAL) or His–Asp/Gly–Tyr-Pro (HD-GYP) domains (10, 11). Increases in c-di-GMP concentration generally repress flagellar-mediated swimming motility and virulence gene expression, while enhancing EPS production and biofilm formation (10, 12). A variety of effectors that bind c-di-GMP and elicit a physiological response have been identified (13). These include proteins containing degenerate GGDEF and EAL domains (14), the PilZ domain (15), the GGDEF-I-site-like (GIL) domain (16), motifs [e.g., I-site, Walker A, and w[F/L/M][T/S]R (17 22)] and RNA riboswitches (23 25). These binding sites can be found alone (26, 27) or coupled to output domains, the function of which is regulated by signal binding (28 31).

The first class of c-di-GMP protein-binding sites identified was the PilZ domain, which binds c-di-GMP via conserved RxxxR and (D/N)x(S/A)xxG motifs (30, 32). The paradigm for PilZ:c-di-GMP function is the post-translational regulation of swimming motility by YcgR of the enteric bacteria, Escherichia coli (33). E. coli swim through liquid environments by rotating multiple flagella, which have three major segments: the basal body, the hook, and the filament (34). The flagellar motor is part of the basal body and consists of a membrane-embedded stator and the cytoplasmic rotor (35). The stator, formed from the membrane proteins MotA and MotB, conducts protons. The rotor, comprised of FliG, FliM, and FliN, is a complex that exerts clockwise (CW)/counterclockwise (CCW) directional control of motor rotation. As protons travel through the stator, they generate torque at the stator-rotor interface to drive motor rotation (36). Electrostatic interactions between conserved charged residues in MotA and FliG are essential for coupling proton flow to mechanical motion (37, 38). When all the motors rotate CCW simultaneously, the individual flagellar filaments organize into a bundle and the cell is propelled forward in a straight run. Runs are interrupted by tumbles, short episodes of CW flagellar rotation that cause bundle dispersal and random re-orientation of the cell. The switch to CW flagellar rotation is regulated by reversible phosphorylation of the switch protein, CheY; phosphorylated CheY binds to the flagellar motor and increases the probability of CW motor rotation (39 42). Deletion of yhjH, which codes for a PDE, increases cellular c-di-GMP levels and inhibits E. coli swimming motility, whereas deletion of ycgR alone does not. However, loss of ycgR suppresses the motility defect of yhjH deletion, indicating that YcgR inhibits motility under conditions of elevated cellular c-di-GMP (28, 43). It has since been demonstrated that YcgR is an effector that binds c-di-GMP via its PilZ domain (44) and then interacts with the flagellar motor to slow motility and skew motor bias in the CCW direction (33, 44 46).

Marine environments occupy nearly 70% of the earth’s surface (47) and pose very different survival challenges compared to the nutrient-dense habitats of enteric bacteria. Yet, even in these vast ecosystems, most micro-organisms live in biofilms because, sustenance challenges notwithstanding, ambient conditions are highly dynamic and potentially harmful (48, 49). Understanding how marine bacteria decelerate to initiate biofilm formation is critical for understanding processes such as food-chain contamination (50, 51), the generation of microplastics that contaminate drinking water (52, 53), biocorrosion (54), the formation of artificial reefs (55), and genetic exchange (51, 56). The broad strokes of biofilm formation—slowing motility and approaching a surface, loosely associating with it (reversible attachment), and sticking tenaciously (irreversible attachment)—have been largely deciphered. However, many of the finer details, particularly for highly motile marine bacteria, remain largely unknown. What are the primary environmental cues that signal cells to slow down? How are they perceived and converted to secondary signals inside the cell that alter swimming behavior? What encourages cells to linger at a surface long enough to initiate biofilm formation instead of changing direction and moving away?

Some 90% of motile marine bacteria have a single polar flagellum (57) and some species can swim at astonishing speeds of >50× their body length per second (58 60) in search of evanescent microscale nutrient plumes (61, 62). Vibrio species are Gram-negative, halophilic, curved bacteria that are ubiquitous in estuarine and marine environments (63, 64). They have a single polar, sodium-driven flagellum (57) and the stator is composed of the MotA and MotB homologs, PomA and PomB. The flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus can spin at speeds of 1,700 revolutions per second (58), far faster than the 300 revolutions per second observed for the motors of E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium (65, 66). Vibrio species swim using a distinct, three-step pattern that cycles between forward runs, reversals of ~180°, and flicks (run-reverse-flicks) that re-orient the cell (59, 67, 68). CCW rotation of the flagella pushes the cell forward (run), while CW rotation pulls it backward (reverse). Flicks occur during the transition from backward to forward swimming and re-orients the cell head ~90°. This strategy is preferred in marine environments where searching is unproductive and exploitation of an existing, albeit transient, resource takes precedence because bacteria can retrace their steps in the surrounding water and quickly relocate nutrients before they are dissipated by turbulent conditions (62, 69, 70). However, high speeds and acute flicks that may re-orient the cell away from a surface pose serious challenges to initiating biofilm formation.

A dozen Vibrio species including V. vulnificus, V. cholerae, and V. parahaemolyticus are pathogenic to humans (64, 71). They are autochthonous to estuaries and warm coastal waters, and their environmental persistence and transmission are bolstered by their ability to form biofilms on biotic and abiotic marine surfaces (72, 73). c-di-GMP is proposed to be a key regulator of Vibrio physiology, the genomes of which can code for more than 100 proteins predicted to make, break, or bind the signaling molecule (74). The Vibrio effector and YcgR homolog, PlzD, has been studied in some detail but its mechanism of action is unclear. As observed for ycgR, deletion of the plzD had little impact on V. cholerae swimming motility, while its over-expression inhibited motility and decreased intestinal colonization (75). PlzD was shown to tightly bind c-di-GMP with a dissociation constant (KD) of ~300 nM (32, 75). Both the apo (76) and holo structures of PlzD have been solved (32). Although both are dimeric, each monomer in the holo structure binds a single molecule of c-di-GMP, resulting in a major conformational change, whereby the C-terminal PilZ domain is rotated 123° toward the N-terminal YcgR domain with c-di-GMP sandwiched in the junction between them. Yet, inhibition of swimming motility by PlzD was reported to be independent of c-di-GMP binding since a mutant that was unable to bind c-di-GMP still suppressed motility when over-expressed (75). It is difficult to imagine that the activity of PlzD is unphased by such a dramatic structural reconfiguration upon c-di-GMP binding and that its function is indeed c-di-GMP independent. Moreover, the mechanism by which PlzD ultimately inhibits motility (i.e., subcellular localization, potential interacting partners, etc) has not been resolved. Similarly, deletion of plzD did not affect V. alginolyticus swimming motility, while its over-expression reduced motility (77). Again, this activity was reported to be independent of c-di-GMP binding since mutants bearing substitutions in the conserved ligand-binding pocket also inhibited motility when over-expressed. And despite PlzD localizing to the flagellar pole, its interaction with the flagellar motor was deemed too weak to inhibit motility (77), making its mechanism of action even more nebulous.

V. vulnificus naturally colonizes marine foodstuffs such as oysters, fish, and eel (78). Unlike other family members, which typically cause gastroenteritis, V. vulnificus is best known for causing devastating wound and septicemic infections (78, 79). The fatality rate of septicemic patients can exceed 50%, and V. vulnificus carries the highest death rate and per case economic burden (>$3.3 M) of any foodborne disease agent (80). We recently showed that calcium, a major constituent of marine ecosystems, triggers V. vulnificus biofilm formation by increasing cellular levels of c-di-GMP (81). Elevated levels of c-di-GMP induce expression of the biofilm-promoting EPS encoded by the brp locus (82 85) and the matrix protein, CabA (85 87). Here, we investigate the mechanism by which elevated cellular c-di-GMP levels inhibit V. vulnificus swimming motility to encourage biofilm formation. We show that PlzD inhibits swimming motility in response to elevated c-di-GMP levels, and mutation of the RXXXR motif suppressed this phenotype. PlzD localized to the flagellar pole in slow-moving, adherent, and biofilm cells in a c-di-GMP- and PomA-dependent manner. Single-cell tracking of bacterial swimming trajectories revealed that PlzD modified the foraging behavior of cells by slowing swimming speed and decreasing the number of directional changes to limit exploration of the surrounding 3D space. The cumulative effects were increased biofilm formation, aggregation and oyster colonization, and attenuated virulence in mice, phenotypes that bolster the evolution of V. vulnificus as a resilient environmental organism and potent human pathogen.

RESULTS

PlzD mediates inhibition of V. vulnificus swimming motility by elevated cellular c-di-GMP

Elevated cellular c-di-GMP levels promote V. vulnificus biofilm formation by increasing the production of EPS and the CabA matrix protein (82 87). To determine if elevated cellular c-di-GMP levels also impacted V. vulnificus swimming motility, colony spread by the wild-type (WT) strain with unaltered and elevated cellular c-di-GMP levels was assessed. Control cells harboring the empty expression vector were motile when inoculated into semi-solid agar (Fig. 1A), whereas colony spread was strongly inhibited in cells over-expressing dcpA, which codes for a V. vulnificus DGC that synthesizes c-di-GMP (88). A transposon screen revealed that disruption of aot11_00285 partially relieved c-di-GMP-mediated inhibition of swimming motility. The protein encoded by aot11_00285 shared 55% identity with PlzD of V. cholerae, including an N-terminal YcgR domain and a C-terminal PilZ domain bearing the highly conserved RxxxR and D/NxSxxG motifs that coordinate the binding of c-di-GMP (Fig. 1D). Consequently, aot11_00285 was named plzD. The motility of an in-frame plzD deletion mutant expressing dcpA phenocopied that of the transposon mutant (Fig. 1A), and this could be complemented by ectopic expression of the wild-type gene (Fig. S1A). Although deletion of plzD had little effect on swimming motility when c-di-GMP levels were unaltered (Fig. S1B), its constitutive expression strongly inhibited motility (Fig. 1B and C). These results suggested that the inhibition of motility by elevated cellular c-di-GMP levels was linked in part to the activity of PlzD.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Inhibition of V. vulnificus motility by elevated cellular c-di-GMP is PlzD dependent. (A) Motility of WT control cells carrying the empty vector or expressing the DGC, DcpA. Also shown is the motility of the △plzD strain expressing dcpA. (B) Motility of the WT strain constitutively expressing plzD (PcatplzD). (C) A plot of the corresponding motility zones for the strains in A and B. It shows the respective mean values for each strain and error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate assays. Different symbols above each bar indicate statistically significant differences between strains (one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test, P < 0.001). Identical symbols indicate no significant difference between those specific strains. (D) domain structure of PlzD (green arrow), which contains an N-terminal YcgR and C-terminal PilZ domain (purple regions). The conserved RXXXR and D/NxSxxG motifs (blue) that comprise the c-di-GMP binding site are also shown. R140, which is part of the RXXXR motif, is marked with an asterisk.

Mutation of the PilZ domain inhibits PlzD function

V. cholerae PlzD tightly binds c-di-GMP (32, 75) and we sought to determine if V. vulnificus PlzD also bound the signaling molecule. Structural modeling suggested that the predicted c-di-GMP binding site of V. vulnificus PlzD closely aligned with the known c-di-GMP binding site of PlzD from V. cholerae (Fig. S2A). Notably, the respective DXSXXG motifs mirrored one another. R136 and R140 of the RXXXR motif of V. cholerae PlzD engage in H-bonding and stacking interactions, respectively, with a guanine base. These roles were conserved in the RXXXR motif of V. vulnificus PlzD, with R136 base stacking and R140 H-bonding with the guanine base. The conservation of binding site stereochemistry suggested that V. vulnificus PlzD activity might also be dependent on interaction with c-di-GMP. Although wild-type V. cholerae PlzD binds c-di-GMP, a PlzDR140A mutant does not (32, 75). The analogous amino acid change was introduced into V. vulnificus PlzD and the binding of c-di-GMP by the wild-type and mutant proteins was qualitatively measured by micro-equilibrium dialysis, where the concentration of a ligand is varied and binding is measured at equilibrium (89, 90). Both wild-type PlzD and PlzDR140A were stably produced to comparable levels and purified (Fig. S2B). A device with two chambers separated by a membrane (10 kDa cut-off) was loaded with a fixed concentration of c-di-GMP in one chamber and varying concentrations of sample protein in the other (Fig. 2A, inset). The protein, being too large to cross the membrane, remains in its chamber. The ligand, however, can freely pass through the membrane to interact with the protein and, if so, is retained in the adjacent chamber. Hence, the concentration of c-di-GMP in the ligand chamber should remain constant following equilibration if the protein introduced into the adjacent chamber is unable to bind c-di-GMP. However, if the protein can stably bind c-di-GMP, then the concentration of c-di-GMP in the ligand chamber should decrease as the concentration of protein added to the adjacent chamber increases. A plot of the UV absorbance at 253 nm of samples taken from the ligand chamber versus the ligand:protein ratio yields qualitative information of the relative c-di-GMP binding affinity (91). Significant decreases in c-di-GMP concentration in the ligand chamber were observed following equilibration with increasing concentrations of PlzD, whereas the c-di-GMP concentration in the ligand chamber remained unchanged over the same range of PlzDR140A concentrations (Fig. 2A). This suggested that PlzD was able to stably bind c-di-GMP while PlzDR140A could not, and that mutation of R140 prevented ligand binding. Plotting the fraction of free c-di-GMP versus the concentration of protein yielded a KD of 3.9 µM for PlzD (Fig. S2C).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Mutation of the RXXXR motif abrogates c-di-GMP binding and PlzD function. (A) Plot showing the binding of c-di-GMP by purified wild-type PlzD and PlzDR140A. The concentration of unbound c-di-GMP remaining in the ligand chamber following micro-equilibrium dialysis (inset) was determined by measuring the absorbance at 253 nm and plotted versus the amount of protein added to the opposing chamber (the protein:ligand ratio). Points represent the mean of three independent assays and error bars represent the standard deviation. (B) Motility of the ∆plzD mutant expressing the indicated gene(s). Plasmids are as follows: pC2X, the empty vector for expression of plzD or plzDR140 ; pSU, the empty vector for expression of dcpA or cdgJ. The control strain is outlined with a dotted white line. The plot below shows the respective mean values for each strain and error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate assays. Different symbols above each bar indicate statistically significant differences between strains (one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test, P < 0.01). Identical symbols indicate no significant difference between those specific strains.

The effect on motility of plzD and plzDR140A was assessed in a ΔplzD background under decreased [by co-expressing cdgJ of V. cholerae, which codes for a PDE that degrades c-di-GMP (92)], unaltered, and elevated (by co-expressing dcpA) cellular c-di-GMP levels. Control cells were motile (Fig. 2B, middle). Expression of plzD alone inhibited motility twofold, while expression of plzDR140A alone had no effect on motility (top left and right). Expression of plzD together with dcpA inhibited motility 3.5-fold (middle left). However, co-expression of plzDR140A and dcpA resulted in only a 1.6-fold inhibition (middle right), consistent with the inability of PlzDR140A to mitigate the inhibitory effect of elevated c-di-GMP on motility. Motility was not inhibited when either plzD or plzDR140A was co-expressed with cdgJ (bottom left and right). Together, these results suggested that c-di-GMP-regulated inhibition of motility by PlzD was dependent on a functional PilZ domain and binding of c-di-GMP.

PlzD alters the foraging behavior V. vulnificus

To better characterize the effect of plzD expression on the run-reverse-flick swimming pattern of V. vulnificus (Fig. 3A), we tracked single-cell trajectories in 3D using high-speed, time-lapse phase contrast microscopy. Planktonic wild-type cells exhibited classic run-reverse-flick patterns of forward and reverse runs peppered with re-orientations (turns) in the x, y, and z planes that promoted extensive exploration of the surrounding space (Fig. 3B), with an average speed of 55 µm/s (Fig. 3C). An average of 0.5 flicks per second was observed for these cells (Fig. 3D) and although the turn angles (ϴ) ranged from 87° to 179°, they primarily fell into two clusters of ~93° (flicks) and 167° (reversals), respectively (Fig. 3E). Wild-type cells expressing plzD produced curvilinear traces and did not exceed 30 µm/s. Notably, the median turn angle was large (~168°) and the flick frequency was eightfold lower than wild-type cells (0.06 flicks per second). Consequently, cells tended to meander along only two axes with minimal backtracking. These results suggested that PlzD functioned to decrease cell swimming speed, decrease the number of directional changes in rotation, and decrease flick frequency, thereby limiting tri-axial movement and exploration of the surrounding 3D space.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

PlzD alters the swimming behavior of V. vulnificus cells. (A) Representation of a Vibrio cell propelled by a single polar flagella with a left-handed helical twist. The direction of flagellar rotation determines whether the cell is pushed (CCW rotation) or pulled (CW rotation). The forward-reverse-flick motility pattern of Vibrio species is depicted below. Switching from CCW to CW rotation results in near 180° reversals. Flicks result from buckling of the flagellar hook (red) on resuming forward movement. A smaller deflection correlates with a larger flick angle. (B) Reconstructed representative 3D swimming trajectories of WT cells carrying the empty vector or expressing plzD (+plzD). A colored speed scale is also shown. (C–E) Quantifying the swimming speed, number of flicks, and flick angles of swimming cells. Violin plots show the median, first and third quartiles, and data range for at least 100 tracks for each strain. Statistically significant differences between the samples were determined by an unpaired Student’s t-test (two-tailed) in C (**P < 0.001) and an unpaired Mann-Whitney test (two-tailed) in D and E (**P < 0.001).

PlzD localization to the flagellar pole is c-di-GMP dependent

Considering its effect on motility, we sought to determine the subcellular location of PlzD under elevated c-di-GMP levels (i.e., in cells co-expressing dcpA). Under elevated cellular c-di-GMP conditions, a polar fluorescent signal was observed in 94% of ΔplzD cells that expressed a construct coding for a stable and functional PlzD-superfolder green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion (PlzDsfGFP; Fig. 4 and Fig. S3). When cells were also stained with Vybrant DiD (a fluorescent lipophilic dye that labels bacterial membranes), both cell bodies and the sheathed flagella were uniformly labeled by the dye, and PlzDsfGFP clearly localized to the flagellar pole. This suggested that PlzD might interact with the flagellar complex to slow motility. Since mutation of the PilZ domain mitigated its ability to inhibit motility, we determined if c-di-GMP affected its subcellular location. Time-lapse microscopy was used to monitor the subcellular localization of PlzDsfGFP in ΔplzD cells in response to increasing c-di-GMP levels. When cells were seeded into microfluidic chambers in media that lacked arabinose (i.e., unaltered cellular c-di-GMP conditions), the PlzDsfGFP signal was diffuse (Fig. 5A). The media was then exchanged to one that included arabinose to induce dcpA expression and increase the cellular c-di-GMP concentration. Under these conditions, the PlzDsfGFP signal began to coalesce at one pole and was clearly visible 30 min post-induction. Conversely, PlzDR140AsfGFP remained dispersed both before and after c-di-GMP levels were elevated (Fig. 5B). Further support for polar localization by PlzD was obtained by adding Ca2+ to the media, which is known to increase cellular c-di-GMP levels in V. vulnificus (81). The PlzDsfGFP signal was diffuse in cells prior to the addition of Ca2+, but polar in the presence of Ca2+ (Fig. S4).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

PlzD localizes to the flagellar pole. Top, phase/fluorescence overlay image (100× magnification) of ∆plzD cells expressing dcpA and plzDsfgfp . To the right is a plot showing the percentage of cells with a polar (white bar) or cytoplasmic (gray bar) fluorescent signal. Bars indicate the respective mean values (n = 100) for each strain and error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate assays. Statistically significant differences (***P < 0.0001) were determined by an unpaired Mann-Whitney test (two-tailed). Bottom, representative overlay image of ∆plzD cells expressing dcpA and plzDsfgfp that were also stained with the lipophilic membrane stain, Vybrant Red (VR) to show the flagella. The scale bar is 1 µm.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Polar localization of PlzD is c-di-GMP dependent. (A and B) Time-lapse overlay of phase and GFP fluorescence images (100× magnification) showing the subcellular distribution of PlzDsfGFP and PlzDR140AsfGFP, respectively, in ∆plzD cells 0–75 min after cellular c-di-GMP levels were increased by inducing dcpA expression with L-arabinose. White arrows highlight polar localization of PlzDsfGFP. The scale bar in the upper left box is 1 µm. (C) Quantification of the polar PlzDsfGFP (gray) and PlzDR140AsfGFP (white) ratio of cells swimming at the indicated speeds. Violin plots show the median, upper and lower quartiles, and data range for at least 100 tracks for each strain. Different symbols above each bar indicate statistically significant differences between strains (one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test, P < 0.01). Identical symbols indicate no significant difference between those specific strains.

The movement of single cells within 30 µm of the coverslip surface was tracked by high-speed, time-lapse fluorescence microscopy and cells were binned according to speed. The ratio of polar to total PlzDsfGFP signal was determined for each cell and plotted versus speed. A correlation emerged between cell speed and PlzDsfGFP subcellular localization. The PlzDsfGFP signal was completely dispersed in rapidly swimming cells but was almost entirely polar in slow-moving and stationary cells (Fig. 5C). Indeed, the ratio of polar PlzDsfGFP signal increased as cell speed decreased. The greatest variability in PlzDsfGFP location occurred at speeds between 20 µm/s and 30 µm/s. A polar PlzDsfGFP signal was more commonly observed in cells swimming at speeds closer to 20 µm/s rather than those swimming at speeds near the upper end of the bin. Conversely, the signal for PlzDR140AsfGFP remained dispersed at all speeds. Collectively, these results suggested that PlzD localization to the flagellar polar was regulated by c-di-GMP and required a functional RXXXD motif.

Localization of PlzD to the flagellar pole is dependent on PomA

Localization of PlzD to the flagellar pole suggested that it interacted with the flagellar complex to slow motility. To identify potential interacting partners of PlzD at the flagellar pole, ∆plzD strains harboring deletions in genes coding for rotor (fliG and fliM), stator (pomA and pomB), and switch (cheY3) components were generated, and PlzDsfGFP was then localized in each background under elevated cellular c-di-GMP conditions. The fluorescent signal in control cells expressing sfgfp alone was entirely diffuse (Fig. 6). Nearly all (>95%) of the PlzDsfGFP signals were polar in the ∆plzDfliG, ∆plzDfliM, and ∆plzDCheY3 backgrounds. However, the PlzDsfGFP signal was partially diffuse in the ∆plzDpomA and ∆plzDpomAB backgrounds (55% and 45% polar, respectively). These results suggested that the localization of PlzD to the flagellar pole was partly dependent on PomA, but on FliG, FilM, or CheY3.

Fig 6.

Fig 6

PlzD localization to the flagellar pole is dependent on PomA. Localization of GFP (control) or PlzDsfGFP in ∆plzD cells that also carry deletions of the indicated rotor (fliG and fliM), stator (pomA and pomB), and switch (cheY) genes. Images were taken at 100× magnification and the scale bar is 1 µm. On the right is a plot showing the percentage of cytoplasmic (gray bar) and polar (white bar) PlzDsfGFP signal in cells (n = 100) from each background. Bars indicate the respective mean values for each strain and error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate assays. Different symbols above each bar indicate statistically significant differences between strains (one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test, P < 0.001). Identical symbols indicate no significant difference between those specific strains.

PlzD promotes biofilm formation, aggregation, and oyster colonization

Given the overall effect of plzD expression on motility, we sought to determine its impact on surface colonization. Wild-type, ΔplzD, and strains that constitutively express either plzD or plzDR140A (PcatplzD and PcatplzDR140A ) were separately seeded into microfluidic chambers under constant flow and biofilm development was monitored by fluorescence microscopy. The wild-type, ΔplzD, and PcatplzDR140A strains failed to produce a monolayer, and microcolony formation by these strains was scant (Fig. 7). Both monolayer and microcolony formation were superior for the PcatplzD strain and the overall biomass was sixfold higher by comparison. An extensive monolayer and robust microcolony formation were observed for the wild-type strain under elevated c-di-GMP conditions (expressing dcpA), and the biofilm biomass was nearly 11-fold higher than the parental strain. A similar phenotype was observed for the PcatplzD strain expressing dcpA, with a biomass increase of 13-fold relative to the wild-type strain. However, the biomass of the ∆plzD strain expressing dcpA was only twofold higher than wild type and monolayer formation remained poor. Although the biomass of the PcatplzDR140A strain expressing dcpA was only threefold higher than wild type, constitutive plzDR140A expression did encourage sparse monolayer formation, suggesting that PlzDR140A retained some residual activity. These results suggested that PlzD functioned to enhance monolayer formation and subsequent biofilm development, and mutation of the RXXXR motif hinders PlzD function.

Fig 7.

Fig 7

PlzD promotes biofilm formation. Hoechst-stained fluorescent images (40× magnification) of biofilms formed under constant flow by WT, ∆plzD, or constitutive expression strains (PcatplzD and PcatplzDR140A ) under unaltered and elevated (+dcpA) cellular c-di-GMP conditions. A plot of the corresponding biofilm biovolumes is to the right of the panels. The plot shows the mean values for each strain and error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate assays. Different symbols above each bar indicate statistically significant differences between strains (one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test, P < 0.05). Identical symbols indicate no significant difference between those specific strains.

Oysters size-select particles for ingestion. Those less than 5 µm in size are poorly retained (<20% efficiency), while particles greater than 5 µm are captured with nearly 100% efficiency (93). Since planktonic Vibrio cells are just 1 μm × 1 μm × 2 μm, self-association (aggregation) could boost their retention by feeding bivalves. To assess the role of plzD in aggregation, we first used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis to determine the percentage of aggregates in 50 µm filtrates of wild-type, ∆plzD, and PcatplzD strains that were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) (without or with added 15 mM Ca2+) and Instant Ocean (IO) at 20 ppt or 35 ppt. Each strain existed mainly as single cells (<1% aggregates) when grown in LB (Fig. 8A). The addition of Ca2+ to LB increased aggregation by each strain; however, deletion of plzD decreased aggregation by 35% relative to the wild-type and PcatplzD strains. A similar pattern was observed when the strains were grown in IO-20. The difference in aggregation between strains was greatest in IO-35, where aggregation by the ∆plzD strain was only 30% that of the wild-type and PcatplzD strains. To determine if the difference in aggregation translated to a difference in oyster colonization, the strains were inoculated into separate tanks and their ability to colonize oysters was determined by CFU plate count (Fig. 8B). There was a strong correlation between the level of aggregation and the extent of oyster colonization. A low level of oyster colonization (~1.6 × 105 CFU/g body weight) was observed for all three strains when grown in LB. This increased significantly when the strains were grown in LB with Ca2+, but colonization by the ∆plzD strain was decreased by 36% relative to the wild-type and PcatplzD strains. A similar pattern was observed when the strains were grown in IO-20. Again, the difference in colonization was greater when the strains were grown in IO-35, where colonization by the wild-type and PcatplzD strains was 2.5× that of the ∆plzD strain. These results suggested that PlzD functions to promote biofilm formation, aggregation, and oyster colonization in estuarine and marine environments.

Fig 8.

Fig 8

PlzD promotes V. vulnificus aggregation and oyster colonization. (A) Aggregation by WT, ∆plzD, or complemented (PcatplzD) strains grown in LB, LB containing calcium (LB-Ca), Instant Ocean at 20 ppt (IO-20) or 35 ppt (IO-35). Vertical dashed lines separate each media type. (B) Oyster colonization by the same strains in A. Oysters were inoculated and the number of CFU per gram of oyster meat was determined. Plots show the mean values for each strain and error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate assays. Different symbols above each bar indicate statistically significant differences (one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test, P < 0.01) between samples. Identical symbols indicate no significant difference between those specific strains.

Constitutive PlzD production attenuates V. vulnificus virulence

The effect of plzD expression on motility led us to investigate its impact on V. vulnificus virulence. Four strains were tested: wild type, ∆plzD, a ∆wzy mutant that fails to produce the anti-phagocytic capsular polysaccharide, and a strain that constitutively expressed plzD (PcatplzD). There was no difference in growth between the strains (Fig. S5). Groups of five mice were injected i.p. with 107 CFU of each strain and survival was tracked over the course of 5 days. All mice infected with the wild-type strain died within 24 h (Fig. 9A), and tissue necrosis and hemorrhaging were observed in the vicinity of the wound site (Fig. 9B). Results with the ∆plzD strain were indistinguishable from the wild-type strain (Fig. S6). Conversely, all mice infected with the ∆wzy strain survived and the tissue at the wound site appeared healthy. Although two of the mice infected with the strain that constitutively expressed plzD succumbed, the first death did not occur until 84 h post-infection and three subjects survived the full 5 days. Bacteria were re-isolated from the blood of these two mice and the integrated PcatplzD region from 20 random clones (10 from each mouse) was amplified and sequenced. Nonsense mutations (8T > G, 19A > T, 68T > G, 423C > G) within plzD were identified in 19 of the clones and another bore a G > C mutation within the ribosome binding site (RBS) of Pcat that likely inhibited translation initiation. This suggested that these animals succumbed to V. vulnificus infection due to the emergence of suppressor mutants that no longer constitutively expressed plzD. Finally, the wounds of mice that were exposed to the strain that constitutively expressed plzD exhibited signs of necrosis but there was very little bleeding in the surrounding tissue. The PcatplzD strain was also far less motile than the parental and Δwzy strains (9C). Collectively, these results suggested that constitutive plzD expression attenuated V. vulnificus virulence in mice by impeding dissemination from the site of infection.

Fig 9.

Fig 9

PlzD attenuates V. vulnificus virulence. (A) Survival curve for mice injected with the WT strain, a mutant strain that fails to produce capsule (∆wzy), or a strain that constitutively expresses plzD. Five-week-old female CD-1 mice housed under pathogen-free conditions were pretreated with an intraperitoneal injection of iron dextran (250 µg of iron-dextran per gram of body weight) 60 min before inoculation of excisional skin wounds with the bacterial strains. Groups of mice (n = 5) were injected intraperitoneally with 0.1 mL of 107 CFU of each bacterial strain. Mice were observed for up to 120 h post-infection with the recording of deaths or moribund animals. Statistically significant differences between the WT strain and the ∆wzy and plzD strains were determined by the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox, P-value, ****<0.0001) test. (B) Representative images of excisional skin wounds 8 h post-infection with 107 CFU of the same strains. To the right is a plot of the CFU recovered per gram of tissue from each wound site after 24 h. The plot shows the mean values for each strain and error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate assays. Statistically significant differences from WT (one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons post hoc test, P-values, *<0.05 and ***<0.001) are shown. (C) Motility of strains in A.

DISCUSSION

Motile bacteria cannot “coast” in aqueous environments and must keep rotating their flagella to swim (94). The rotational speed of the Na+-driven flagellar motor for some Vibrio species has been reported to be as high as 1,700 revolutions per second (58), making these among the fastest molecular motors in biological systems. Slowing such astonishing motor speeds is essential when switching from a motile to sessile lifestyle. There are several post-translational mechanisms by which rapid deceleration of the Na+-driven flagellar motor could be achieved, such as through a reduction in [Na+] that could occur in estuaries where fresh and saltwater mix (95), by a transient drop in cellular ATP concentrations (96), or by the activity of proteins that function as a brake to halt rotation of the flagellar motor (33) or as a clutch that uncouples rotation of the flagellar motor from the flagellar filament (97).

The paradigm for c-di-GMP-mediated, post-translational control of swimming motility is YcgR (33). In response to elevated c-di-GMP concentrations, YcgR binds c-di-GMP and interacts with the flagellar motor to suppress motility (33, 98). c-di-GMP binding triggers rearrangement of the PilZ domain and the formation of a MotA-binding patch comprised of the RXXXR motif and the C-tail helix α3 of the PilZ domain (44). Monomeric YcgR:c-di-GMP is reported to stably bind at the stator-rotor interface, interacting with MotA via its C-terminal PilZ domain and FliG via its N-teminal YcgR domain, to disrupt rotor-stator interactions (44, 99). These interactions initially alter motor bias and then decrease motor speed (46).

The mechanism of action for YcgR homologs in Vibrio species is not as refined. V. cholerae PlzD tightly binds c-di-GMP and undergoes a large conformational change (32, 75), yet, the activity of PlzD was reported to be c-di-GMP independent since both wild-type and c-di-GMP binding mutants of PlzD inhibited swimming motility when over-expressed to high levels (75). Moreover, PlzD was required for intestinal colonization but not biofilm formation. The function of PlzD in V. alginolyticus is even murkier. As in V. cholerae, both wild-type and c-di-GMP binding mutants of PlzD inhibited V. alginolyticus swimming motility when highly over-expressed, and although PlzD localized to the flagellar pole, its interaction with the flagellar motor was concluded to be too weak to inhibit rotation (77). PlzD aggregation was suggested as the cause of motility inhibition; this was most likely due to high-level plzD expression under low cellular c-di-GMP conditions.

In this study, plzD was recovered from a transposon mutant screen to identify insertions that relieved c-di-GMP-mediated inhibition of motility in V. vulnificus. The function of plzD was then examined under low-level inducing conditions partnered with varied cellular c-di-GMP levels to better define its role and the requirement for c-di-GMP binding for activity. PlzD bears the conserved RXXXR and D/NxSxxG motifs that coordinate c-di-GMP binding, and its predicted structure suggested that PlzD could bind c-di-GMP. Equilibrium dialysis was used to monitor interactions between PlzD and c-di-GMP by measuring changes in the UV absorbance of c-di-GMP (91). Although UV measurements are not as sensitive as radioligand detection (32), this approach still permitted qualitative measurement of relative binding by wild-type and mutant PlzD. Wild-type PlzD was clearly able to bind c-di-GMP, whereas PlzDR140A did not. The KD of 3.9 µM for PlzD was higher than reported for V. cholerae PlzD (32, 75) and YcgR (28) using radioligand; however, it was on par with the KD of other c-di-GMP effectors measured using this technique (91). The expression of wild-type plzD did not impact swimming motility when cellular c-di-GMP levels were depleted, but it mediated motility inhibition when c-di-GMP levels were left unaltered or were elevated. Conversely, the RXXXR mutant had no impact on swimming motility, regardless of the cellular c-di-GMP level. Since mutating the RXXXR motif or decreasing cellular c-di-GMP levels suppressed PlzD-mediated inhibition of motility, we propose that PlzD not only binds c-di-GMP, but that ligand binding regulates its activity.

Our data suggest that PlzD modifies V. vulnificus swimming behavior in two ways. The first is to decrease swimming speed. PlzD localized to the flagellar pole in a c-di-GMP- and PomA-dependent manner, and polar localization was most often observed in slow-moving, adherent, and biofilm cells. Tracking of single-cell trajectories revealed that plzD expression significantly reduced the speed of swimming cells (from more than 60 µm/s to below 30 µm/s). This is notable since flicking by Vibrio species correlates with swimming velocity, with a threshold of ~20–30 µm/s being required to induce a sufficient compressive load for flicking to occur (67, 68). Consequently, the probability of swimming cells to re-orient away from a surface that is being probed for potential colonization decreases as cells decelerate. Interactions between PlzD and PomA at the flagellar pole could perturb rotor-stator contacts and slow swimming speed, as reported for YcgR (44, 99). The second is to decrease switches between the forward and reverse swimming directions. The rapid, exploratory swim tracks of wild-type cells were peppered with reversals, flicks, and backtracks, while cells expressing plzD produced slow-moving, meandering, curvilinear traces with few flicks and backtracks. Although polar PlzD localization was not dependent on rotor proteins, this does not preclude transient interactions between them that could regulate CW/CCW rotational control, as proposed for YcgR, the N-terminus of which interacts with rotor proteins to regulate motor switching (44). It is also conceivable that PlzD instead interacts with known or novel components of the chemotaxis pathway to bias motor switching (100, 101). Additional studies are needed to ascertain if PlzD alters motor speed and bias concurrently or consecutively, if interactions with motor proteins in addition to PomA are required, and if PlzD function is mediated by non-motor (e.g., chemotaxis) proteins.

The phenotypic effects of plzD expression included increased biofilm formation, self-aggregation, and oyster colonization, important survival and colonization phenotypes for V. vulnificus. We propose that the restricted exploratory range of cells expressing PlzD increases linger time in the vicinity of a surface to promote initial attachment (102). PlzD expression also attenuated virulence in mice, most likely by impeding dissemination from the site of infection (103). Unlike YcgR, the loss of PlzD did not entirely prevent c-di-GMP-mediated inhibition of motility (46). Hence, additional mechanisms exist to slow motility in response to elevated c-di-GMP levels. Previous studies of five PilZ domain proteins in V. cholerae demonstrated overlap in their function: PlzB, PlzC, and PlzD regulated intestinal colonization and motility, and PlzB and PlzC were positive regulators of biofilm formation (75). Similar overlap may exist in V. vulnificus. Studies are under way to identify additional c-di-GMP-dependent systems of motility control that co-ordinate with the activity of PlzD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and growth conditions

V. vulnificus strain ATCC27562 was used. E. coli S17.1λπ was used for cloning, plasmid maintenance, and conjugation to V. vulnificus. LB was purchased from BD Difco. The following antibiotics and additives were purchased from Sigma and used at the indicated concentrations: ampicillin (Ap) at 100 µg/mL, colistin (Col) at 12.5 µg/mL, tetracycline (Tc) at 15 µg/mL, chloramphenicol (Cm) at 2 µg/mL for V. vulnificus and 25 µg/mL for E. coli, kanamycin (Kn) at 160 µg/mL for V. vulnificus and 25 µg/mL for E. coli, trimethoprim (Tp) at 10 µg/mL, gentamicin (Gm) at 35 µg/mL, and isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 10 µM or 100 µM. Instant Ocean was used at 20 ppt (IO-20) or 35 ppt (IO-35) and peptone was added to 1% where indicated.

Transposon mutagenesis

A transposon mutagenesis library of wild-type cells expressing dcpA from pSU38GT (83) was generated by conjugation with E. coli S17.1λπ that carried the mini-Tn10 delivery vector pNKTXI-SceI (104). Transconjugants were selected on plates containing LB medium with Col, Kn, and Gm. A total of 12,530 mutants arrayed in 384-well plates and grown with shaking at 30°C overnight before 2 µL of each mutant was inoculated into 245 × 245 mm plates (Corning) containing 200 mL of motility medium (LB with 0.3% agar). The plates were incubated for 12 h at 30°C and mutants exhibiting increased motility relative to wild-type controls were manually picked, grown overnight in 96-well plates containing fresh medium, and rescreened in motility medium to confirm the phenotype. The PbaddcpA promoter region of each motility mutant from this second round of screening was verified as unaltered by sequencing (Eurofins Genomics). Mutants were grown in fresh LB Col Kn Gm medium to an optical density (OD600) of 1.0, and 50 µL aliquots of each were pooled for genomic DNA isolation and whole-genome sequencing at the Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics at Indiana University Bloomington. Geneious (Biomatters) was used to map single-end 150 bp reads to the V. vulnificus reference genome (105) to identify Transposon (Tn) insertion sites.

Construction and complementation of the ΔplzD strain

For markerless deletion of plzD, PCR fragments corresponding to 1 kb upstream (primers DplzD-pRE112-SP-F and DplzD-SP-1) and downstream (primers DplzD-SP-2 and DplzD-pRE112-SP-R) of the gene were amplified, fused by overlapping PCR, and cloned into the multiple cloning site (MCS) of pRE112 (106) by Gibson assembly. Colonies were selected on LB Cm plates, and plasmids containing the correct insert were identified by PCR. Following conjugation to V. vulnificus, cointegrates were selected on LB Col Cm plates and then gridded onto plates that lacked Cm but contained 20% sucrose for sacB-mediated counterselection. The mutants were white on LB X-Gal plates and confirmed by PCR. For complementation, plzD was amplified with primers plzD-pC2X6HIST-SP-F and plzD-pC2X6HIST-SP-R and cloned downstream of the Ptac promoter in pC2X6HT (84). This plasmid was then used to introduce the plzDR140A mutation by inverse PCR with primers 898PlzD-R140A-F and 898plzD-SPM-R. The plasmid was sequenced to confirm nothing else was altered. These plasmids were conjugated to ΔplzD cells and expression was induced with 10 µM IPTG.

An in-frame deletion of the gene encoding the flagellar motor protein FliG was accomplished as follows: PCR fragments that included 1 kb upstream to the first 9 bp of fliG (primers DfliG-1 and DfliG-TpK7-2) and the last 9 bp to 1 kb downstream of fliG (primers DfliG-TpK7-3 and DfliG-4) were amplified and fused to a central trimethoprim antibiotic resistance cassette (primers TmR-F and TmR-R). The primers included complementary 35 bp overhangs so that the PCR products could be fused together using the Gibson assembly kit (New England BioLabs) to replace fliG with a trimethoprim marker. V. vulnificus strains carrying the pMMB-TfoX expression plasmid (107) were induced overnight in LB medium containing Ap and IPTG at 30°C. A 10 µL aliquot of cells was added to 500 µL of IO-20 containing 100 µM IPTG and the Gibson reaction mixture. The transformation mixture was incubated statically overnight at 30°C. The next day, 1 mL of LB medium was added to the tube, and the cells were allowed to outgrow for 3 h before plating on LB Tp plates. Allelic replacement of the target region was confirmed by PCR. This method was also used to delete the fliM (motor), motA and motB (stator), or cheY3 (switch) genes in the ΔplzD background. See Table S1 for primer sequences.

Construction of the PcatplzD strain for infection studies

The 160 bp Pcat promoter of pSW23T (108) (amplified with primers PcatFor and PcatRev) was fused to plzD (amplified with primers PcatplzD-F and PcatplzD-R) by PCR for ectopic integration into the chromosomal β-galactosidase (lacZ) gene. This product was flanked by 1 Kb regions (amplified with VvlacZ-1 and VvlacZ-2 and VvlacZ-3 and VvlacZ-4, respectively) of lacZ using the Gibson ligation kit (NEB). The reaction was transformed into the ΔplzD strain carrying pMMB-TfoX as described above. Transformants were plated on media including Xgal, and colonies that were white on LB X-Gal plates were confirmed by PCR. Since PcatplzD insertion inactivated lacZ, a strain in which the lacZ promoter (PlacZ ) was deleted was used as a control. To delete PlacZ , PCR fragments corresponding to 1 kb upstream (primers DPlacZ-pRE118-SP-F and DPlacZ-SP-1) and downstream (primers DPlacZ-SP-2 and PlacZ-pRE118-SP-R) of the lacZ promoter region were amplified, fused, and cloned into the MCS of pRE118 (106) by Gibson assembly. Colonies were selected on LB Cm plates, and plasmids containing the correct insert were identified by PCR. Following conjugation to V. vulnificus, cointegrates were selected on LB Col Cm plates and then gridded onto plates that lacked Cm but contained 20% sucrose for sacB-mediated counterselection. Promoter deletion mutants were white on LB X-Gal plates and confirmed by PCR.

Protein purification and micro-dialysis assay for c-di-GMP binding

Expression of His-tagged PlzD and PlzDR140A from pC2X6HT was induced in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells (Novagen) with 100 µM IPTG. The proteins were purified by His-Trap Ni-NTA affinity chromatography as previously described (84). To exchange buffer, proteins were applied to a 5 mL HiTrap desalting column and eluted with 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5) containing 100 mM NaCl and 5 mM MgCl2. Proteins were used immediately or stored at 4°C for up to 2 weeks. For longer-term storage, glycerol was added to 50% and the samples were kept at −20°C. The concentration of the purified proteins was determined by Nanodrop A280 nm measurement.

c-di-GMP binding assays were done by micro-equilibrium dialysis (89) using a device with 2 µL × 25 µL chambers separated by a re-generated cellulose membrane with 10 KDa cut-off (Harvard Apparatus). Twenty-five microliters of c-di-GMP (10 µM) and 25 µL of increasing concentrations of His-tagged PlzD or PlzDR140A (2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 µM) were added to opposing chambers of the device. Buffer alone was used for no-protein controls. The assembled device was gently rocked at 4°C overnight to reach equilibrium. The c-di-GMP concentration in the ligand chamber was determined by UV absorbance (253 nm, ε = 28,600 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹) at room temperature (109) using a Synergy H1 microplate reader with Take3 accessory (Biotek). The absorbance of unbound c-di-GMP in the ligand chamber was plotted versus the protein:ligand ratio in Prism 9. Overnight dialysis for the no-protein control showed that the absorption spectra of samples from both chambers were equal, indicating that overnight incubation was sufficient to reach equilibration and that c-di-GMP does not interact with the membrane or chamber walls.

Fluorescence microscopy

The pC2X6HT plasmid expressing the plzD-gfp fusion was conjugated into the indicated V. vulnificus strains and expression was induced with IPTG (10 µM). Images of individual cells were captured after cells were mounted on low melting point agarose pads or using the CellAsic microfluidic perfusion system (ONIX) with integrated temperature controller and B04A bacterial microfluidic plates (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA). The CellAsic ONIX FG software (v 5.0.2.0) was used to control flow rate and deliver fresh medium. The chambers were loaded by perfusion of 50 µL of a 106 cells per milliliter bacterial suspension at 2 lb/in2 for 15 s to prime the system followed by 4 lb/in2 for 15 s to trap the cells. The chamber was then rinsed at 1 lb/in2 for 30 s followed by 2 lb/in2 for the remainder of the assay. Single-cell static, time-lapse images and movies were captured on an Olympus IX83 inverted microscope using a 100×, 1.3 numerical aperture phase contrast objective. Phase contrast and fluorescence images were obtained with a Hamamatsu ORCA-R2 digital charge-coupled device camera, and the light source was the Xcite 120 light-emitting diode (Lumen Dynamics, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Emission filters were purchased from Chroma Technology (Bellows Falls, VT). The specific emission filters were DAPI-5060C-OMF [excitation (EX) filter, 377/50 nm; emission (EM) filter, 447/60 nm; dichroic mirror (DM), 409 nm], GFP-3035D-OMF (EX filter, 473/31 nm; EM filter, 520/35 nm; DM, 495 nm), and mCherry-B-OFF (EX filter, 562/40 nm; EM filter, 641/75 nm; DM, 593 nm). Data from three biological replicates were analyzed for each strain. Images were processed using cellSense software (Olympus) and those presented are from a single representative experiment.

Aggregation and biofilm assays

Strains expressing gfp were grown in LB, LB plus Ca2+ (15 mM), IO-20, or IO-35 media overnight at 30°C. The cells were passed over a 50 µm filter, and flow cytometry of the filtrates was performed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) equipped with a blue laser (λex = 488 nm) and a band pass filter measuring green fluorescence (FL1; 530/30 nm). The sample flow rate was set at “low” (12 ± 3 µL/min) and 70,000 events were recorded within a preset gate defining the viable cell population. Analyses were performed on biological triplicates and the data were analyzed using FlowJo X (Tree Star).

Polydimethylsiloxane glass flow cell devices containing eight 40 × 5 × 1 mm3 chambers were fabricated as previously described (110). The chambers were sterilized by sequential treatment with 50 mL each of 3% H2O2, sterile H2O, and IO-20 prior to inoculation. Mid-log phase cells for each strain (OD600 of 0.1) were seeded into separate flow cell chambers. Control chambers for background fluorescence contained medium only. Initial attachment (no flow) proceeded for 20 min, followed by a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min in IO-20 tryptone for 16 h. The chambers were then exposed to the same medium containing 2.5 µM Hoechst stain (ThermoFisher) for 10 min. Biofilm images and z-stacks (20 × 1 µm slices) were captured with an Olympus IX83 microscope using a UPLSAPO 40× silicon oil immersion objective [numerical aperture (NA), 1.25; working distance (WD), 0.3 mm]. Background fluorescence was subtracted from each sample, and quantitative analysis to determine biomass was performed using cellSense (Olympus) and Comstat (111). Data from three biological replicates were analyzed for each strain. The images presented are from a single representative experiment.

3D motility tracking

V. vulnificus was grown overnight in IO-20 tryptone Col media at 30°C. An aliquot was gently washed once in IO-20 medium (5 min at 4,000 g) and then diluted to an OD600 of 0.1 in fresh IO-20 medium. Tracking chambers were made by layering three parafilm frames between a microscope slide and a 22 mm × 22 mm no. 1.5 coverslip. The chamber was sealed by placing it in a 55°C dry oven for 10 min. A culture of bacteria grown overnight was diluted into IO-20 medium to an OD600 of 0.1 and flowed into the chamber at one edge by capillary action. The edges of the unit were sealed with hot VALAP, and the samples were immediately imaged on the above-mentioned microscope equipped with an Olympus long working distance (LWD) air condenser (NA, 0.55) and an Olympus LUCPLFLN LWD 40× phase contrast objective (Ph2; NA, 0.6). The correction collar was set to 1.2. For each movie recording, frames were acquired at a rate of 15 Hz and an exposure time of 5 ms with a Hamamatsu Orca-R2 camera (1,344 by 1,024 pixels). The objective was positioned so that the focus was 50 µm above the coverslip. The data were saved as a stack of 16-bit tiff files of 300 images each. Image stacks were background corrected and aligned to a 3D position reference library in Matlab using a custom-written tracking program to analyze motility behavior (59, 112). Each re-orientation event (flicks and reversals) identified by the program was manually confirmed based on the angle and swimming speed between the corresponding vectors for at least 100 trajectories prior to statistical analysis. Trajectories with an average speed of less than 10 µm/s or with a duration of less than 50 frames were ignored. Plots were created using data from three stacks of three biological replicates for each strain. Traces from a single representative experiment are shown.

Structural modeling

The crystal structure of PlzD (PDB 2RDE) of Vibrio cholerae was used as a scaffold to build structural models for PlzD using AlphaFold2 (113). Chimera (114) was used for molecular visualization. Five homology models were generated for each protein, and the model with the best overall agreement score was analyzed further.

We elected to internally tag PlzD with superfolder GFP (sfGFP) since soft agar motility assays and Western blotting indicated that amino or carboxy terminal tags were inactive or unstable (data not shown). Because the structure of PlzD is not known, we first compared the known structures of PlzD and the Bacillus subtilis YcgR homolog DgrA, in which a stably tagged functional fusion was made by inserting sfGFP into an exposed N-terminal loop (115). Structural modeling revealed a homologous N-terminal exposed loop (between P50 and V51) and two C-terminal exposed loops (between N152 and D153, and between P174 and M175) in PlzD that were predicted to be conserved in PlzD as potential targets for sfGFP insertion that would minimally interfere with function as a monomer or dimer. The C1 loop fusion (PlzDsfGFP) was stably expressed in V. vulnificus and inhibited motility as well as native PlzD (Fig. S4).

Oyster colonization assay

Overnight, ice-packed shipments of live Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) were acclimated at 20°C for 1 h and thoroughly scrubbed to eliminate epifauna. Sets of five similarly sized oysters were placed in open autoclavable polypropylene cages and transferred to a custom maintenance system consisting of 40-gallon aquaria filled with IO-20. Each tank was equipped with two CNZ Wavemaker 1320-GPH circulators and a HOB-XC protein skimmer (AquaMaxx) with a Cobalt 12–16 skimmer pump. Aquaria were maintained a constant temperature of 20°C with a HAAKE DC10/EK20 immersion cooler system (ThermoFisher Scientific). Oysters were fed Tetraselmis 3600 and Shellfish Diet 1800 (Reed Mariculture) for at least 48 h prior to experimentation and they could be readily maintained for a month. Oysters were rinsed and transferred to 5-gallon aquaria containing 8 L of IO-20 at 20°C for depuration with a combination of Cm and Tc for 16 h to lower endogenous bacterial loads and promote establishment of the test inoculum. Oysters were then transferred to 5-gallon aquaria equipped with an activated charcoal filtration cartridge and 8 L of fresh IO-20 for overnight incubation to eliminate residual antibiotic from oyster tissues. Depurated oysters were then transferred to individual 5-gallon aquaria with 8 L of fresh IO-20 for inoculation with V. vulnificus. Bacteria were grown overnight at 20°C in IO-20 supplemented with 1% tryptone. Inoculums were added to the aquaria at a final concentration of 106 CFU/mL for natural uptake via filter feeding. Control oysters did not receive bacteria. Oysters were shucked 36 h after inoculation under sterile conditions using an oyster knife that was rinsed with 70% ethanol and flamed. Oyster meats from sets of five animals were collected and rinsed with 100 mL of sterile Vibrio-specific phosphate-buffered saline (VPBS) to remove planktonic cells and loosely attached bacteria. Sterile VPBS (200 mL) was added to the rinsed meat and the sample was homogenized using a Magic Bullet Blender (Capbran) in three pulses of 20 s each. The homogenates were serially diluted in VPBS and CFU counts were determined on LB Col plates following overnight incubation at 30°C. No isolates were ever recovered on LB Col plates for homogenates of uninoculated control oysters. Experiments were performed in triplicate for each strain.

Mouse survival and skin wound assays

Strains were inoculated from single colonies into IO-20 tryptone and were cultured overnight at 30°C. The overnight culture was seeded at a 1:100 dilution into fresh media and incubated at 30°C until the bacteria reached an OD600 of 1.0. Bacteria were collected by centrifugation and washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Bacterial cell concentrations were confirmed by plate counts. Five-week-old female CD-1 mice housed under pathogen-free conditions were pretreated with an intraperitoneal injection of iron dextran (250 µg of iron-dextran per gram of body weight) 60 min before inoculation with the bacterial strains. Groups of mice (n = 5) were injected intraperitoneally with 0.1 mL of 107 CFU of each bacterial strain. Mice were observed for up to 120 h post-infection with the recording of deaths or moribund animals.

For excisional skin wounds, mice were anesthetized with 5% isoflurane in 100% O2 and subsequently maintained using 3% isoflurane. The dorsal skin was shaved to remove hair, thoroughly cleaned, and disinfected prior the surgery using betadine scrub and 75% EtOH solution. Preoperative analgesia was applied using a subcutaneous injection of Meloxicam (2 mg/kg) and a full-thickness 10 mm wound (through the panniculus carnosus layer) was created between the shoulder blades of the mice using a scalpel. A silicone ring splint (0.5 mm thick with a 20 mm inner diameter, Life Technologies) centered around the wound was affixed to the skin with immediate‐bonding adhesive (Gluture) and nylon sutures to prevent wound contraction. 107 CFU of the indicated bacterial strain was applied to the wound site and then it was covered with Tegaderm semi-occlusive dressing (3M). Wounds were digitally photographed 8 h post-infection. Experiments were performed in triplicate for each strain. The images presented are from a single representative experiment. Mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. Ankur Dalia (Indiana University) for the pMMB-tfoX plasmid.

Contributor Information

Dean Rowe-Magnus, Email: drowemag@indiana.edu.

Edward G. Ruby, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Christopher M. Waters, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

ETHICS APPROVAL

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Indiana University approved all protocols, and the study adhered to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01536-23.

Figure S1. mbio.01536-23-s0001.tif.

PlzD-mediates inhibition of V. vulnificus motility by elevated cellular c-di-GMP.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF1
Figure S2. mbio.01536-23-s0002.tif.

Structural alignment of the PilZ domains of PlzD from V. cholerae and V. vulnificus.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF2
Figure S3. mbio.01536-23-s0003.tif.

The PlzDsfGFP fusion is stable and functional.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF3
Figure S4. mbio.01536-23-s0004.tif.

Polar localization of PlzD in planktonic and biofilm cells.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF4
Figure S5. mbio.01536-23-s0005.tif.

Growth of V. vulnificus strains in IO20.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF5
Figure S6. mbio.01536-23-s0006.tif.

Virulence of the wild-type and △plzD strains.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF6
Legends. mbio.01536-23-s0007.docx.

Supplemental figure legends.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF7
Table S1. mbio.01536-23-s0008.docx.

Primers used in this study.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF8

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. 2004. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:95–108. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Tolker-Nielsen T. 2015. Biofilm development. Microbiol Spectr 3:MB-0001. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MB-0001-2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lewis K. 2007. Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:48–56. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fisher RA, Gollan B, Helaine S. 2017. Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:453–464. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Raina J-B, Eme L, Pollock FJ, Spang A, Archibald JM, Williams TA. 2018. Symbiosis in the microbial world: from ecology to genome evolution. Biol Open 7:bio032524. doi: 10.1242/bio.032524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Balcázar JL, Subirats J, Borrego CM. 2015. The role of biofilms as environmental reservoirs of antibiotic resistance. Front Microbiol 6:1216. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Römling U, Gomelsky M, Galperin MY. 2005. C-di-GMP: the dawning of a novel bacterial signalling system. Mol Microbiol 57:629–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04697.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Jenal U, Malone J. 2006. Mechanisms of cyclic-di-GMP signaling in bacteria. Annu Rev Genet 40:385–407. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chou S-H, Guiliani N, Lee VT, Römling U. 2020. Microbial cyclic Di-nucleotide signaling, p 577–591. In Microbial cyclic Di-Nuclotide signaling. springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33308-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Jenal U, Reinders A, Lori C.. 2017. Cyclic di-GMP: second messenger extraordinaire. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:271–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Dahlstrom KM, O’Toole GA. 2017. A symphony of cyclases: specificity in diguanylate cyclase signaling. Annu Rev Microbiol 71:179–195. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Römling U, Amikam D. 2006. Cyclic di-GMP as a second messenger. Curr Opin Microbiol 9:218–228. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kunz S, Graumann PL. 2020. Spatial organization enhances versatility and specificity in cyclic di-GMP signaling. Biol Chem 401:1323–1334. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2020-0202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hengge R. 2016. Trigger phosphodiesterases as a novel class of c-di-GMP effector proteins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 371:20150498. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Amikam D, Galperin MY. 2006. Pilz domain is part of the bacterial c-di-GMP binding protein. Bioinformatics 22:3–6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Fang X, Ahmad I, Blanka A, Schottkowski M, Cimdins A, Galperin MY, Römling U, Gomelsky M. 2014. GIL, a new c-di-GMP-binding protein domain involved in regulation of cellulose synthesis in enterobacteria. Mol Microbiol 93:439–452. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Baraquet C, Harwood CS. 2013. Cyclic diguanosine monophosphate represses bacterial flagella synthesis by interacting with the walker A motif of the enhancer-binding protein FleQ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:18478–18483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318972110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hickman JW, Harwood CS. 2008. Identification of FleQ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a c-di-GMP-responsive transcription factor. Mol Microbiol 69:376–389. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06281.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Krasteva PV, Fong JCN, Shikuma NJ, Beyhan S, Navarro M, Yildiz FH, Sondermann H. 2010. Vibrio cholerae VpsT regulates matrix production and motility by directly sensing cyclic di-GMP. Science 327:866–868. doi: 10.1126/science.1181185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Leduc JL, Roberts GP. 2009. Cyclic di-GMP allosterically inhibits the CRP-like protein (Clp) of xanthomonas axonopodis pv. J Bacteriol 191:7121–7122. doi: 10.1128/JB.00845-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lee VT, Matewish JM, Kessler JL, Hyodo M, Hayakawa Y, Lory S. 2007. A cyclic-di-GMP receptor required for bacterial exopolysaccharide production. Mol Microbiol 65:1474–1484. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05879.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tschowri N, Schumacher MA, Schlimpert S, Chinnam NB, Findlay KC, Brennan RG, Buttner MJ. 2014. Tetrameric c-di-GMP mediates effective transcription factor dimerization to control streptomyces development. Cell 158:1136–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Pursley BR, Maiden MM, Hsieh M-L, Fernandez NL, Severin GB, Waters CM. 2018. Cyclic di-GMP regulates TfoY in vibrio cholerae to control motility by both transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms. J Bacteriol 200:e00578-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00578-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kulshina N, Baird NJ, Ferré-D’Amaré AR. 2009. Recognition of the bacterial second messenger cyclic diguanylate by its cognate riboswitch. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:1212–1217. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Pursley BR, Fernandez NL, Severin GB, Waters CM. 2019. The Vc2 cyclic di-GMP-dependent riboswitch of vibrio cholerae regulates expression of an upstream putative small RNA by controlling RNA stability. J Bacteriol 201:e00293-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00293-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Pecina A, Schwan M, Blagotinsek V, Rick T, Klüber P, Leonhard T, Bange G, Thormann KM. 2021. The stand-alone PilZ-domain protein motl specifically regulates the activity of the secondary lateral flagellar system in shewanella putrefaciens. Front Microbiol 12:726192. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.726192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kuzmich S, Skotnicka D, Szadkowski D, Klos P, Pérez-Burgos M, Schander E, Schumacher D, Søgaard-Andersen L. 2021. Three PilZ domain proteins, PlpA, PixA and PixB, have distinct functions in regulation of motility and development in Myxococcus Xanthus. Biorxiv 203:e0012621. doi: 10.1128/JB.00126-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ryjenkov DA, Simm R, Römling U, Gomelsky M. 2006. The PilZ domain is a receptor for the second messenger c-di-GMP: the PilZ domain protein YcgR controls motility in enterobacteria. J Biol Chem 281:30310–30314. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C600179200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Baker AE, Diepold A, Kuchma SL, Scott JE, Ha DG, Orazi G, Armitage JP, O’Toole GA. 2016. PilZ domain protein FlgZ mediates cyclic di-GMP-dependent swarming motility control in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 198:1837–1846. doi: 10.1128/JB.00196-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ko J, Ryu K-S, Kim H, Shin J-S, Lee J-O, Cheong C, Choi B-S. 2010. Structure of PP4397 reveals the molecular basis for different c-di-GMP binding modes by Pilz domain proteins. J Mol Biol 398:97–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Schumacher MA, Zeng W. 2016. Structures of the activator of K. pneumonia biofilm formation, MrkH, indicates PilZ domains involved in c-di-GMP and DNA binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:10067–10072. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607503113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Benach J, Swaminathan SS, Tamayo R, Handelman SK, Folta-Stogniew E, Ramos JE, Forouhar F, Neely H, Seetharaman J, Camilli A, Hunt JF. 2007. The structural basis of cyclic diguanylate signal transduction by PilZ domains. EMBO J 26:5153–5166. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Paul K, Nieto V, Carlquist WC, Blair DF, Harshey RM. 2010. The c-di-GMP binding protein YcgR controls flagellar motor direction and speed to affect chemotaxis by a “backstop brake. Mol Cell 38:128–139. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Terashima H, Kawamoto A, Morimoto YV, Imada K, Minamino T. 2017. Structural differences in the bacterial flagellar motor among bacterial species. Biophys Physicobiol 14:191–198. doi: 10.2142/biophysico.14.0_191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Berg HC. 2008. Bacterial flagellar motor. Curr Biol 18:R689–R691. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kojima S, Blair DF. 2004. The bacterial flagellar motor: structure and function of a complex molecular machine. Int Rev Cytol 233:93–134. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(04)33003-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Zhou J, Lloyd SA, Blair DF. 1998. Electrostatic interactions between rotor and stator in the bacterial flagellar motor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:6436–6441. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Lloyd SA, Blair DF. 1997. Charged residues of the rotor protein FliG essential for torque generation in the flagellar motor of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 266:733–744. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Scharf BE, Fahrner KA, Turner L, Berg HC. 1998. Control of direction of flagellar rotation in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:201–206. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Hess JF, Oosawa K, Kaplan N, Simon MI. 1988. Phosphorylation of three proteins in the signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 53:79–87. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90489-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Bren A, Eisenbach M. 1998. The N terminus of the flagellar switch protein, flim, is the binding domain for the chemotactic response regulator, chey11edited by I. B. Holland. J Mol Biol 278:507–514. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Barak R, Eisenbach M. 1996. Regulation of interaction between signaling protein CheY and flagellar motor during bacterial chemotaxis. Curr Top Cell Regul 34:137–158. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2137(96)80005-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ko M, Park C. 2000. Two novel flagellar components and H-NS are involved in the motor function of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 303:371–382. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Hou Y-J, Yang W-S, Hong Y, Zhang Y, Wang D-C, Li D-F. 2020. Structural insights into the mechanism of c-di-GMP–bound YcgR regulating flagellar motility in Escherichia coli J Biol Chem 295:808–821. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Girgis HS, Liu Y, Ryu WS, Tavazoie S. 2007. A comprehensive genetic characterization of bacterial motility. PLoS Genet 3:1644–1660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Nieto V, Partridge JD, Severin GB, Lai R-Z, Waters CM, Parkinson JS, Harshey RM. 2019. Under elevated c-di-GMP in Escherichia coli, YcgR alters flagellar motor bias and speed sequentially, with additional negative control of the flagellar regulon via the adaptor protein RssB. J Bacteriol 202:e00578-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00578-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Administration TNO and A . 2021. How much water is in the ocean? Available from: https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/about/welcome.html#cite
  • 48. Dang H, Lovell CR. 2016. Microbial surface colonization and biofilm development in marine environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 80:91–138. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00037-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Sushmitha TJ, Rajeev M, Pandian SK. 2023. Understanding microbial biofilms, p 3–21. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37851-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Carrascosa C, Raheem D, Ramos F, Saraiva A, Raposo A. 2021. Microbial biofilms in the food industry—a comprehensive review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:2014. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Qian P-Y, Cheng A, Wang R, Zhang R. 2022. Marine biofilms: diversity, interactions and biofouling. Nat Rev Microbiol 20:671–684. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00744-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Harrison JP, Hoellein TJ, Sapp M, Tagg AS, Ju-Nam Y, Ojeda JJ. 2017. Freshwater microplastics, emerging environmental contaminants?, p 181–201. In The handbook of environmental chemistry. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00675 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Batté M, Appenzeller BMR, Grandjean D, Fass S, Gauthier V, Jorand F, Mathieu L, Boualam M, Saby S, Block JC. 2003. Biofilms in drinking water distribution systems. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2:147–168. doi: 10.1023/B:RESB.0000040456.71537.29 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Procópio L. 2019. The role of biofilms in the corrosion of steel in marine environments. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 35:73. doi: 10.1007/s11274-019-2647-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Mugge RL, Salerno JL, Hamdan LJ. 2021. Microbial functional responses in marine biofilms exposed to deepwater horizon spill contaminants. Front Microbiol 12:636054. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.636054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Sushmitha TJ, Rajeev M, Sriyutha Murthy P, Ganesh S, Toleti SR, Karutha Pandian S, Chiang T-Y. 2021. Bacterial community structure of early-stage biofilms is dictated by temporal succession rather than substrate types in the southern coastal seawater of India. PLoS One 16:e0257961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. McCarter LL. 2001. Polar flagellar motility of the vibrionaceae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 65:445–462. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.3.445-462.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Magariyama Y, Sugiyama S, Muramoto K, Maekawa Y, Kawagishi I, Imae Y, Kudo S. 1994. Very fast flagellar rotation. Nature 371:752–752. doi: 10.1038/371752b0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Taute KM, Gude S, Tans SJ, Shimizu TS. 2015. High-throughput 3D tracking of bacteria on a standard phase contrast microscope. Nat Commun 6:8776. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Bente K, Mohammadinejad S, Charsooghi MA, Bachmann F, Codutti A, Lefèvre CT, Klumpp S, Faivre D. 2020. High-speed motility originates from cooperatively pushing and pulling flagella bundles in bilophotrichous bacteria. Elife 9:e47551. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Raina J-B, Lambert BS, Parks DH, Rinke C, Siboni N, Bramucci A, Ostrowski M, Signal B, Lutz A, Mendis H, Rubino F, Fernandez VI, Stocker R, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW, Seymour JR. 2022. Chemotaxis shapes the microscale organization of the ocean’s microbiome. Nature 605:132–138. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04614-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Stocker R, Seymour JR, Samadani A, Hunt DE, Polz MF. 2008. Rapid chemotactic response enables marine bacteria to exploit ephemeral microscale nutrient patches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:4209–4214. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709765105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Thompson FL, Iida T, Swings J. 2004. Biodiversity of vibrios. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68:403–431, doi: 10.1128/MMBR.68.3.403-431.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Grimes DJ. 2020. The vibrios: scavengers, symbionts, and pathogens from the sea. Microb Ecol 80:501–506. doi: 10.1007/s00248-020-01524-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Lowe G, Meister M, Berg HC. 1987. Rapid rotation of flagellar bundles in swimming bacteria. Nature 325:637–640. doi: 10.1038/325637a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Kudo S, Magariyama Y, Aizawa S-I. 1990. Abrupt changes in flagellar rotation observed by laser dark-field microscopy. Nature 346:677–680. doi: 10.1038/346677a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Xie L, Altindal T, Chattopadhyay S, Wu X-L. 2011. Bacterial flagellum as a propeller and as a rudder for efficient chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:2246–2251. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011953108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Son K, Guasto JS, Stocker R. 2013. Bacteria can exploit a flagellar buckling instability to change direction. Nature Phys 9:494–498. doi: 10.1038/nphys2676 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Son K, Menolascina F, Stocker R. 2016. Speed-dependent chemotactic precision in marine bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:8624–8629. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602307113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Stocker R, Seymour JR. 2012. Ecology and physics of bacterial chemotaxis in the ocean. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:792–812. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00029-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Farmer JJ, Janda JM. 2020. Bergey’s manual of systematics of archaea and bacteria, p 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Yildiz FH, Visick KL. 2009. Vibrio biofilms: so much the same yet so different. Trends Microbiol 17:109–118. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Baker-Austin C, Oliver JD, Alam M, Ali A, Waldor MK, Qadri F, Martinez-Urtaza J. 2018. Vibrio spp. Infections. Nat Rev Dis Primers 4:8. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0005-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Stock AM. 2007. Diguanylate cyclase activation: it takes two. Structure 15:887–888. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2007.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Pratt JT, Tamayo R, Tischler AD, Camilli A. 2007. PilZ domain proteins bind cyclic diguanylate and regulate diverse processes in vibrio cholerae. J Biol Chem 282:12860–12870. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611593200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Zhang R, Zhou M, Moy S, Collart F, Joachimiak A, MCSG) MC for SG . 2005. The crystal structure of the protein of unknown function Vca0042 from Vibrio cholerae O1. doi: 10.2210/pdb1yln/pdb [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Kojima S, Yoneda T, Morimoto W, Homma M. 2019. Effect of PlzD, a YcgR homolog of c-di-GMP binding protein, on polar flagellar motility in vibrio alginolyticus. J Biochem 166:77–88. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvz014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Oliver JD. 2015. The biology of Vibrio vulnificus. Microbiol Spectr 3. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VE-0001-2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Coerdt KM, Khachemoune A. 2021. Vibrio vulnificus: review of mild to life-threatening skin infections. Cutis 107:E12–E17. doi: 10.12788/cutis.0183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Hoffmann S, Maculloch B, Batz M. 2015. Economic burden of major Foodborne illnesses acquired in the United States. 140. U.S. Department of Agriculture, economic research service [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Chodur DM, Coulter P, Isaacs J, Pu M, Fernandez N, Waters CM, Rowe-Magnus DA. 2018. Environmental calcium initiates a feed-forward signaling circuit that regulates biofilm formation and rugosity in Vibrio vulnificus. mBio 9:e01377-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01377-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Guo Y, Rowe-Magnus DA. 2010. Identification of a c-di-GMP-regulated polysaccharide locus governing stress resistance and biofilm and rugose colony formation in Vibrio vulnificus. Infect Immun 78:1390–1402. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01188-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Guo Y, Rowe-Magnus DA. 2011. Overlapping and unique contributions of two conserved polysaccharide loci in governing distinct survival phenotypes in Vibrio vulnificus. Environ Microbiol 13:2888–2990. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02564.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Chodur DM, Guo L, Pu M, Bruger E, Fernandez N, Waters C, Rowe-Magnus DA. 2017. The proline variant of the W[F/L/M][T/S]R cyclic di-gMP binding motif suppresses dependence on signal association for regulator function. J Bacteriol 199:e00344-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00344-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Chodur DM, Rowe-Magnus DA. 2018. Complex control of a genomic island governing biofilm and rugose colony development in Vibrio vulnificus. J Bacteriol 200:e00190-18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00190-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Park JH, Jo Y, Jang SY, Kwon H, Irie Y, Parsek MR, Kim MH, Choi SH, Satchell KJF. 2015. The cabABC operon essential for biofilm and rugose colony development in Vibrio vulnificus. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005192. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Hwang S-H, Park JH, Lee B, Choi SH. 2019. A regulatory network controls cabABC expression leading to biofilm and rugose colony development in Vibrio vulnificus Front Microbiol 10:3063. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Nakhamchik A, Wilde C, Rowe-Magnus DA. 2008. Cyclic-di-gMP regulates extracellular polysaccharide production, biofilm formation, and rugose colony development by Vibrio vulnificus . Appl Environ Microbiol 74:4199–4209. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00176-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Chiou S-H, Kao C-L, Chang Y-L, Ku H-H, Tsai Y-J, Lin H-T, Yen C-J, Peng C-H, Chiu J-H, Tsai T-H. 2007. Evaluation of anti-fas ligand-induced apoptosis and neural differentiation of PC12 cells treated with nerve growth factor using small interfering RNA method and sampling by microdialysis. Anal Biochem 363:46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.01.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Kuznetsova IM, Sulatskaya AI, Povarova OI, Turoverov KK, Subramanyam R. 2012. Reevaluation of ANS binding to human and bovine serum albumins: key role of equilibrium microdialysis in ligand – receptor binding characterization. PLoS ONE 7:e40845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Luo Y, Zhou J, Watt SK, Lee VT, Dayie TK, Sintim HO. 2012. Differential binding of 2′-biotinylated analogs of c-di-GMP with c-di-GMP riboswitches and binding proteins. Mol Biosyst 8:772–778. doi: 10.1039/c2mb05338a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Liu X, Beyhan S, Lim B, Linington RG, Yildiz FH. 2010. Identification and characterization of a phosphodiesterase that inversely regulates motility and biofilm formation in vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol 192:4541–4552. doi: 10.1128/JB.00209-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Ward JE, Kach DJ. 2009. Marine aggregates facilitate ingestion of nanoparticles by suspension-feeding bivalves. Mar Environ Res 68:137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2009.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Brewer PG, Peltzer ET, Lage K. 2022. Life at low reynolds number re-visited: the efficiency of microbial propulsion. Deep Sea Res Part Oceanogr Res Pap 185:103790. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2022.103790 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. McLusky DS, Elliott M. 2004. The Estuarine Ecosystem. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525080.001.0001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Schavemaker PE, Lynch M. 2022. Flagellar energy costs across the tree of life. Elife 11:e77266. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Blair KM, Turner L, Winkelman JT, Berg HC, Kearns DB. 2008. A molecular clutch disables flagella in the Bacillus subtilis biofilm. Science 320:1636–1638. doi: 10.1126/science.1157877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Boehm A, Kaiser M, Li H, Spangler C, Kasper CA, Ackermann M, Kaever V, Sourjik V, Roth V, Jenal U. 2010. Second messenger-mediated adjustment of bacterial swimming velocity. Cell 141:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Han Q, Wang S-F, Qian X-X, Guo L, Shi Y-F, He R, Yuan J-H, Hou Y-J, Li D-F. 2023. Flagellar brake protein YcgR interacts with motor proteins mota and FliG to regulate the flagellar rotation speed and direction. Front Microbiol 14:1159974. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1159974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Boin MA, Austin MJ, Häse CC. 2004. Chemotaxis in Vibrio cholerae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 239:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.08.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. McCarter LL. 2020. The biology of Vibrios, p 77–92 [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Jones CJ, Utada A, Davis KR, Thongsomboon W, Zamorano Sanchez D, Banakar V, Cegelski L, Wong GCL, Yildiz FH, Parsek MR. 2015. C-di-GMP regulates motile to sessile transition by modulating MshA Pili biogenesis and near-surface motility behavior in Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005068. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Yamazaki K, Kashimoto T, Kado T, Akeda Y, Yoshioka K, Kodama T, Yamamoto M, Okamura M, Kakuda T, Ueno S. 2020. Chemotactic invasion in deep soft tissue by Vibrio vulnificus is essential for the progression of necrotic lesions. Virulence 11:840–848. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1782707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Nakhamchik A, Wilde C, Rowe-Magnus DA. 2007. Identification of a wzy polymerase required for group IV capsular polysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis in Vibrio vulnificus. Infect Immun 75:5550–5558. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00932-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Rusch DB, Rowe-Magnus DA. 2017. Complete genome sequence of the pathogenic Vibrio vulnificus type strain ATCC 27562. Genome Announc 5:e00907-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00907-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Shames SR, Bhavsar AP, Croxen MA, Law RJ, Mak SHC, Deng W, Li Y, Bidshari R, de Hoog CL, Foster LJ, Finlay BB. 2011. The pathogenic Escherichia coli type III secreted protease NleC degrades the host acetyltransferase p300. Cell Microbiol 13:1542–1557. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01640.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Dalia AB, McDonough E, Camilli A. 2014. Multiplex genome editing by natural transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:8937–8942. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406478111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Demarre G, Guérout A-M, Matsumoto-Mashimo C, Rowe-Magnus DA, Marlière P, Mazel D. 2005. A new family of mobilizable suicide plasmids based on broad host range R388 plasmid (IncW) and RP4 plasmid (Incpalpha) conjugative machineries and their cognate Escherichia coli host strains. Res Microbiol 156:245–255. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.09.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Gentner M, Allan MG, Zaehringer F, Schirmer T, Grzesiek S. 2012. Oligomer formation of the bacterial second messenger c-di-GMP: reaction rates and equilibrium constants indicate a monomeric state at physiological concentrations. J Am Chem Soc 134:1019–1029. doi: 10.1021/ja207742q [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Williams M, Hoffman MD, Daniel JJ, Madren SM, Dhroso A, Korkin D, Givan SA, Jacobson SC, Brown PJB. 2016. Short-stalked prosthecomicrobium hirschii cells have a caulobacter-like cell cycle. J Bacteriol 198:1149–1159. doi: 10.1128/JB.00896-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Heydorn A, Nielsen AT, Hentzer M, Sternberg C, Givskov M, Ersbøll BK, Molin S. 2000. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology 146:2395–2407. doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-10-2395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Grognot M, Taute KM. 2021. A multiscale 3D chemotaxis assay reveals bacterial navigation mechanisms. Commun Biol 4:669. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02190-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Terwilliger TC, Poon BK, Afonine PV, Schlicksup CJ, Croll TI, Millán C, Richardson JS, Read RJ, Adams PD. 2022. Improved AlphaFold modeling with implicit experimental information. Nat Methods 19:1376–1382. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01645-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Yang Z, Lasker K, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Webb B, Huang CC, Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Meng EC, Sali A, Ferrin TE. 2012. UCSF chimera, MODELLER, and IMP: an integrated modeling system. J Struct Biol 179:269–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Gao X, Dong X, Subramanian S, Matthews PM, Cooper CA, Kearns DB, Dann CE, Liu S-J. 2014. Engineering of Bacillus subtilis strains to allow rapid characterization of heterologous diguanylate cyclases and phosphodiesterases. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:6167–6174. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01638-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. mbio.01536-23-s0001.tif.

PlzD-mediates inhibition of V. vulnificus motility by elevated cellular c-di-GMP.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF1
Figure S2. mbio.01536-23-s0002.tif.

Structural alignment of the PilZ domains of PlzD from V. cholerae and V. vulnificus.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF2
Figure S3. mbio.01536-23-s0003.tif.

The PlzDsfGFP fusion is stable and functional.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF3
Figure S4. mbio.01536-23-s0004.tif.

Polar localization of PlzD in planktonic and biofilm cells.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF4
Figure S5. mbio.01536-23-s0005.tif.

Growth of V. vulnificus strains in IO20.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF5
Figure S6. mbio.01536-23-s0006.tif.

Virulence of the wild-type and △plzD strains.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF6
Legends. mbio.01536-23-s0007.docx.

Supplemental figure legends.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF7
Table S1. mbio.01536-23-s0008.docx.

Primers used in this study.

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01536-23.SuF8

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES