Skip to main content
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 1987 Apr;22(1):19–47.

Impact of long-term home care on hospital and nursing home use and cost.

S L Hughes, L M Manheim, P L Edelman, K J Conrad
PMCID: PMC1065421  PMID: 3106268

Abstract

This article reports the long-range impact of a long-term home care program in Chicago on hospital and nursing home use and on overall health care costs over four client-years of observation. The evaluation utilized a quasi-experimental design with a comparison group composed of clients who received home-delivered meals. The health services utilization experience of consecutively accepted treatment (N = 157) and comparison group (N = 156) subjects was monitored for 48 client-months following acceptance to care. Imputed costs were then assigned to each type of care measured. Findings include a significantly lower risk of permanent admission to sheltered and intermediate-level nursing home care in the treatment group but no difference in risk of permanent admission to skilled-level nursing home care. Despite savings in low-intensity nursing home days, preliminary findings indicate that total costs of care were 25 percent higher in the treatment group. However, these costs are accompanied by significant quality-of-life benefits in the treatment group (reported elsewhere).

Full text

PDF
19

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hughes S. L. Apples and oranges? A review of evaluations of community-based long-term care. Health Serv Res. 1985 Oct;20(4):461–488. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Katz S., Downs T. D., Cash H. R., Grotz R. C. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20–30. doi: 10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Keeler E. B., Kane R. L., Solomon D. H. Short- and long-term residents of nursing homes. Med Care. 1981 Mar;19(3):363–370. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198103000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. LaTour S. A., Friedman B., Hughes E. F. Medicare beneficiary decision making about health insurance. Implications for a voucher system. Med Care. 1986 Jul;24(7):601–614. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198607000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lubitz J., Prihoda R. The use and costs of Medicare services in the last 2 years of life. Health Care Financ Rev. 1984 Spring;5(3):117–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Manheim L. M., Hughes S. L. Use of nursing homes by a high-risk long-term care population. Health Serv Res. 1986 Jun;21(2 Pt 1):161–176. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975 Oct;23(10):433–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1975.tb00927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shapiro E. Impending death and the use of hospitals by the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983 Jun;31(6):348–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1983.tb05745.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Skellie F. A., Mobley G. M., Coan R. E. Cost-effectiveness of community-based long-term care: current findings of Georgia's alternative health services project. Am J Public Health. 1982 Apr;72(4):353–358. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.4.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Smits H. L. Medical practice variations revisited. Health Aff (Millwood) 1986 Fall;5(3):91–96. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.5.3.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Weissert W. G. Seven reasons why it is so difficult to make community-based long-term care cost-effective. Health Serv Res. 1985 Oct;20(4):423–433. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES