Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 1987 Aug;22(3):369–395.

Heart disease and hospital deaths: an empirical study.

J V Kelly 1, F J Hellinger 1
PMCID: PMC1065444  PMID: 3500151

Abstract

This study examines the effects of selected characteristics of hospitals and physicians on the mortality rates of heart patients who survive their first day in the hospital. Separate multivariate regression analyses are conducted for three groups: (1) patients who undergo a direct heart revascularization or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operation; (2) patients who undergo a cardiac catheterization and do not undergo a CABG operation; and (3) patients with a principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who do not undergo surgery. The number of patients in each group treated by specific physicians, and the number treated in specific hospitals, measure provider experience with similar patients. Other hypothesized determinants of in-hospital mortality include: (1) patient severity of illness, age, sex, and the presence of comorbidities; (2) hospital ownership, size, location, teaching status, resources expended, and the presence of a coronary care unit; and (3) board certification status of the attending physician or surgeon who operated. Empirical results show that presence of a coronary care unit decreases the chance that CABG patients will die in the hospital but is not significant for other heart patients included in this study. Patients with atherosclerosis who receive a CABG or a cardiac catheterization procedure are more likely to survive in hospitals with high volumes of these procedures. However, hospital volume of AMI admissions was not a factor in survival; AMI patients are more likely to survive when their attending physicians treat high volumes of AMI patients. Also, AMI patients whose physicians are board certified in family practice or in internal medicine are less likely to die compared to AMI patients with physicians not board certified. Similarly, AMI patients hospitalized in teaching facilities are less likely to die compared to AMI patients in hospitals not affiliated with a medical school.

Full text

PDF
369

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams D. F., Abrams H. L. Complications of coronary arteriography: a follow-up report. Cardiovasc Radiol. 1979 Apr 27;2(2):89–96. doi: 10.1007/BF02575368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cannom D. S., Miller D. C., Shumway N. E., Fogarty T. J., Daily P. O., Hu M., Brown B., Jr, Harrison D. C. The long-term follow-up of patients undergoing saphenous vein bypass surgery. Circulation. 1974 Jan;49(1):77–85. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.49.1.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coffey R. M., Goldfarb M. G. DRGs and disease staging for reimbursing Medicare patients. Med Care. 1986 Sep;24(9):814–829. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198609000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cosgrove D. M., Loop F. D., Sheldon W. C. Results of myocardial revascularization: a 12-year experience. Circulation. 1982 Jun;65(7 Pt 2):37–43. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.65.7.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Flood A. B., Scott W. R., Ewy W. Does practice make perfect? Part I: The relation between hospital volume and outcomes for selected diagnostic categories. Med Care. 1984 Feb;22(2):98–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flood A. B., Scott W. R., Ewy W. Does practice make perfect? Part II: The relation between volume and outcomes and other hospital characteristics. Med Care. 1984 Feb;22(2):115–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldman L., Cook E. F. The decline in ischemic heart disease mortality rates. An analysis of the comparative effects of medical interventions and changes in lifestyle. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Dec;101(6):825–836. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-6-825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldman L. Coronary care units. A perspective on their epidemiologic impact. Int J Cardiol. 1982;2(2):284–287. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(82)90046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hill J. D., Hampton J. R., Mitchell J. R. A randomised trial of home-versus-hospital management for patients with suspected myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1978 Apr 22;1(8069):837–841. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90190-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelly J. V., Hellinger F. J. Physician and hospital factors associated with mortality of surgical patients. Med Care. 1986 Sep;24(9):785–800. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198609000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Luft H. S., Bunker J. P., Enthoven A. C. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 20;301(25):1364–1369. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197912203012503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Luft H. S. The relation between surgical volume and mortality: an exploration of causal factors and alternative models. Med Care. 1980 Sep;18(9):940–959. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198009000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shortell S. M., LoGerfo J. P. Hospital medical staff organization and quality of care: results for myocardial infarction and appendectomy. Med Care. 1981 Oct;19(10):1041–1055. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198110000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sloan F. A., Perrin J. M., Valvona J. In-hospital mortality of surgical patients: is there an empiric basis for standard setting? Surgery. 1986 Apr;99(4):446–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stross J. K., Willis P. W., 3rd, Reynolds E. W., Jr, Lewis R. E., Schatz I. J., Bellfy L. C., Copp J. Effectiveness of coronary care units in small community hospitals. Ann Intern Med. 1976 Dec;85(6):709–713. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-85-6-709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES