Skip to main content
PMC home page
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 1988 Jun;23(2):203–235.

A general health policy model: update and applications.

R M Kaplan 1, J P Anderson 1
PMCID: PMC1065501  PMID: 3384669

Abstract

This article describes the development of a General Health Policy Model that can be used for program evaluation, population monitoring, clinical research, and policy analysis. An important component of the model, the Quality of Well-being scale (QWB) combines preference-weighted measures of symptoms and functioning to provide a numerical point-in-time expression of well-being, ranging from 0 for death to 1.0 for asymptomatic optimum functioning. The level of wellness at particular points in time is governed by the prognosis (transition rates or probabilities) generated by the underlying disease or injury under different treatment (control) variables. Well-years result from integrating the level of wellness, or health-related quality of life, over the life expectancy. Several issues relevant to the application of the model are discussed. It is suggested that a quality of life measure need not have separate components for social and mental health. Social health has been difficult to define; social support may be a poor criterion for resource allocation; and some evidence suggests that aspects of mental health are captured by the general measure. Although it has been suggested that measures of child health should differ from those used for adults, we argue that a separate conceptualization of child health creates new problems for policy analysis. After offering several applications of the model for the evaluation of prevention programs, we conclude that many of the advantages of general measures have been overlooked and should be given serious consideration in future studies.

Full text

PDF
203

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amberg J. M., Schneiderman L. J., Berry C. C., Zettner A. The abnormal outpatient chemistry panel serum alkaline phosphatase: analysis of physician response, outcome, cost and health effectiveness. J Chronic Dis. 1982 Feb;35(2):81–88. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(82)90109-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson J. P., Bush J. W., Chen M., Dolenc D. Policy space areas and properties of benefit-cost/utility analysis. JAMA. 1986 Feb 14;255(6):794–795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson J. P., Moser R. J. Parasite screening and treatment among Indochinese refugees. Cost-benefit/utility and the General Health Policy Model. JAMA. 1985 Apr 19;253(15):2229–2235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkins C. J., Kaplan R. M., Timms R. M., Reinsch S., Lofback K. Behavioral exercise programs in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Aug;52(4):591–603. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.52.4.591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Balaban D. J., Sagi P. C., Goldfarb N. I., Nettler S. Weights for scoring the quality of well-being instrument among rheumatoid arthritics. A comparison to general population weights. Med Care. 1986 Nov;24(11):973–980. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198611000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergner M., Bobbitt R. A., Carter W. B., Gilson B. S. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981 Aug;19(8):787–805. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergner M., Bobbitt R. A., Pollard W. E., Martin D. P., Gilson B. S. The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care. 1976 Jan;14(1):57–67. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197601000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen M. M., Bush J. W. Maximizing health system output with political and administrative constraints using mathematical programming. Inquiry. 1976 Sep;13(3):215–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Epstein K. A., Schneiderman L. J., Bush J. W., Zettner A. The "abnormal" screening serum thyroxine (T4): analysis of physician response, outcome, cost and health effectiveness. J Chronic Dis. 1981;34(5):175–190. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(81)90063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fielding J. E. Smoking: health effects and control (1). N Engl J Med. 1985 Aug 22;313(8):491–498. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198508223130807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heitzmann C. A., Kaplan R. M. Interaction between sex and social support in the control of type II diabetes mellitus. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Dec;52(6):1087–1089. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.52.6.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaplan R. M., Atkins C. J., Timms R. Validity of a quality of well-being scale as an outcome measure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(2):85–95. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90050-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaplan R. M., Bush J. W., Berry C. C. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res. 1976 Winter;11(4):478–507. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaplan R. M., Ernst J. A. Do category rating scales produce biased preference weights for a health index? Med Care. 1983 Feb;21(2):193–207. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198302000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lenfant C. Lung research: government and community. The 1982 J. Burns Amberson lecture. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Nov;126(5):753–757. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.5.753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lertzman M. M., Cherniack R. M. Rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976 Dec;114(6):1145–1165. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1976.114.6.1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liang M. H., Cullen K., Larson M. In search of a more perfect mousetrap (health status or quality of life instrument). J Rheumatol. 1982 Sep-Oct;9(5):775–779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meenan R. F. The AIMS approach to health status measurement: conceptual background and measurement properties. J Rheumatol. 1982 Sep-Oct;9(5):785–788. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mosteller F. Innovation and evaluation. Science. 1981 Feb 27;211(4485):881–886. doi: 10.1126/science.6781066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Patrick D. L., Bush J. W., Chen M. M. Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index. Health Serv Res. 1973 Fall;8(3):228–245. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Patrick D. L., Sittampalam Y., Somerville S. M., Carter W. B., Bergner M. A cross-cultural comparison of health status values. Am J Public Health. 1985 Dec;75(12):1402–1407. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.12.1402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Petty T. L., Cherniack R. M. Comprehensive care of COPD. Clin Notes Respir Dis. 1981 Winter;20(3):3–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Toevs C. D., Kaplan R. M., Atkins C. J. The costs and effects of behavioral programs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Care. 1984 Dec;22(12):1088–1100. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198412000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Unger K. M., Moser K. M., Hansen P. Selection of an exercise program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Heart Lung. 1980 Jan-Feb;9(1):68–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ware J. E., Jr, Manning W. G., Jr, Duan N., Wells K. B., Newhouse J. P. Health status and the use of outpatient mental health services. Am Psychol. 1984 Oct;39(10):1090–1100. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.39.10.1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES