In the published article, there was an error in Table 4 as published. The incorrect version of Table 4 was published. The corrected Table 4 and its caption appear below.
Table 4.
Goodness-of-fit indices for confirmatory factor analysis of the 18-item Swedish version of Ryff's psychological wellbeing scales.
| Model | NNFI | AGFA | GFI | ECVI | CAIC | RMSEA | CFI | S-B χ2(df) | χ2/df | ΔS-B χ2(Δdf) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 1.63 | 1,538.64 | 0.106 (0.10–0.11) | 0.78 | 1,148.81 (120) | 9.57 | |
| M1 | 0.79 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.42 | 1,293.36 | 0.092 (0.087–0.097) | 0.81 | 1,018.18 (135) | 7.54 | 130.63 (15)** |
| M2 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.35 | 1,249.72 | 0.090 (0.084–0.095) | 0.83 | 966.90 (134) | 7.21 | 181.91 (14)** |
| M3 | 0.39 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 3.98 | 3,256.63 | 0.16 (0.15–0.16) | 0.40 | 2,684.58 (135) | 19.88 | 1,535.77 (15)** |
| M4 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1,056.59 | 0.077 (0.071–0.083) | 0.89 | 666.76 (120) | 5.55 | 482.05** |
| M5 | 0.52 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 879.86 | 0.067 (0.062–0.073) | 0.58 | 597.04 (129) | 4.62 | 551.77 (9)** |
| M6 | 0.23 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 1.24 | 1,150.13 | 0.085 (0.079–0.090) | 0.32 | 882.60 (136) | 6.48 | 266.21 (16)** |
| M7 | 0.90 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.559 | 654.51 | 0.066 (0.059–0.073) | 0.92 | 348.76 (80) | 4.35 | 800.05 (40)** |
M0, model with random item-factor associations; M1, general one-factor for 18 items; M2, two-factor orthogonal model; M3, six-factor orthogonal model; M4, six-factor oblique model; M5, six-factor first-order and second order model; M6, a six-factor first-order model and four-factor second-order that loaded by a four-factor model based on the four most highly correlated dimensions: environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life and self-acceptance; M7, five-factor first-order oblique model after removing the purpose in life subscale. ** < 0.001.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.