Correction: Exoskeleton-based training improves walking independence in incomplete spinal cord injury patients: results from a randomized controlled trial

Correction: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (2023) 20:36 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01158-z

In the original version of this article [1], WISCI-II variable values in the “Baseline and Post-intervention” row of Table 3 has been updated and same has been shown below.

Table 3.

Functional outcomes following exoskeleton training or convectional training, and comparison among times and interventions

		Intervention Mean (SD)			Pairwise comparison (p-value, η2)
		Baseline	Post-intervention	Change	Baseline vs. Post-intv.	IG vs. CG
IG	10MWT (m/s)	0.34 (0.16)	0.57 (0.41)	0.19 (0.16)	0.03*, η2 = 0.39	0.69, η2 = 0.04
	TUG (s)	40.50 (19.70)	27.3 (15.57)	− 13.23 (7.71)	0.00*, η2 = 0.63	0.99, η2 = 0.16
	6MWT (m)	114.67 (71.21)	183.56 (133.10)	68.79 (67.55)	0.00*, η2 = 0.43	0.75, η2 = 0.03
	WISCI-II (0–20)	8.36 (3.98)	11.91 (4.25)	3.54 (2.65)	0.00*, η2 = 0.60	0.00*, η2 = 0.32
	SCIM-III (0–100)	73.54 (7.76)	75.72 (10.05)	2.18 (3.37)	0.03*, η2 = 0.23	0.90, η2 = 0.01
CG	10MWT (m/s)	0.41 (0.22)	0.52 (0.36)	0.12 (0.17)	0.04*, η2 = 0.21
	TUG (s)	37.37 (20.38)	30.42 (20.20)	− 6.9 (7.22)	0.01*, η2 = 0.33
	6MWT (m)	110.95 (72.16)	159.05 (125.50)	48.10 (48.58)	0.02*, η2 = 0.27
	WISCI-II (0–20)	11.7 (3.8)	12.40 (4.45)	0,7 (1.49)	0.28, η2 = 0.05
	SCIM-III (0–100)	73.8 (5.49)	76.3 (6.10)	2.4 (2.7)	0.02*, η2 = 0.24

CG: control group; IG: intervention group; *significant differences (p < 0.05). η2: calculated effect size; 10MWT: 10 Meters Walking Test; TUG: Test Up and Go; 6MWT: 6 Minutes Walking Test; WISCI-II: Walking Index Spinal Cord Injury-II; SCIM-III: Spinal Cord Independence Measurement-III

The original article has been corrected.